Delayed graft function is not associated with an increased incidence of renal allograft rejection

Delayed graft function (DGF) is considered as a risk factor for renal allograft rejection, but this association might be confounded by diagnostic biases (e.g., higher biopsy frequency in patients with DGF, inclusion of clinically diagnosed rejection episodes, and limited details on the rejection phenotype). This retrospective study including 329 deceased donor transplantations aimed to clarify a causal relationship between DGF and rejection. DGF occurred in 93/329 recipients (28%), whereas immediate graft function (IGF) in 236/329 recipients (72%). The percentage of patients with ≥1 allograft biopsy within the first year post‐transplant was similar between the DGF and IGF group (96% vs. 94%; p = 0.60). The cumulative one‐yr incidence of biopsy‐proven clinical (35% vs. 34%; p = 0.62) and combined (sub)clinical rejection (58% vs. 60%; p = 0.79) was not different between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no differences regarding rejection phenotypes/severities and time frame of occurrence. By multivariable Cox regression analysis, donor‐specific HLA antibodies, younger recipient age, and immunosuppressive regimens were independent predictors for clinical rejection, while DGF was not. These results in an intermediate sized, but thoroughly investigated patient population challenge the concept that DGF is a risk factor for rejection and highlights the need for additional studies in this regard.     

Clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients

IntroductionRejection is the most important problem for renal graft function and survival. Complement system plays a key role in immune responses from host to graft. It was demonstrated that complement system activation is related with renal fibrosis. We evaluate clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients.MethodDemographics of the patients, graft functions, acute rejection episodes and graft loss were recorded from data files of 165 pediatric renal transplant patients. Findings of 98 renal biopsies were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsThirty three patients with kidney transplant had 44 acute rejection episodes (32 pure cellular acute rejection episodes / 1 pure humoral acute rejection episode / 11 combined acute cellular and acute humoral rejection episodes) proven by biopsy. C1q staining was positive in 7 biopsies, C3 staining in 15 biopsies and, C4d staining in 15 biopsies. 26 patients had graft fibrosis. All patients with a rejection history had a significant decrease in GFR value during follow-up. Patients who did not have fibrotic changes in first biopsy had same level of deterioration of GFR when compared with patients who had fibrotic changes in first biopsy.ConclusionWe could not demonstrate a significant relation between complement deposition and renal fibrosis, and between complement deposition and GFR values. Our data demonstrated that graft outcomes and graft loss after acute rejection episodes cannot be predicted only with complement deposition on graft or only with graft fibrosis.     

Delayed graft function requiring more than one‐time dialysis treatment is associated with inferior clinical outcomes

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation with negative impact on clinical outcomes. In a single‐center retrospective analysis, we compared patient and kidney survival, early renal function, and the incidence of acute rejection during the first year among all adult deceased donor kidney transplant patients without DGF, with DGF requiring one‐time and/or more than one‐time dialysis treatment between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Of 831 adult kidney transplant patients, 74 (8.9%) required one‐time and 134 (16.1%) more than one‐time dialysis treatment post‐transplantation, respectively. While DGF patients with one‐time dialysis treatment had comparable clinical outcomes to that of patients without DGF, patients with DGF requiring more than one‐time dialysis treatment had a 45% increased risk for death (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.05, p = 0.04) after adjustment for the differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Furthermore, DGF patients with more than one‐time dialysis requirement displayed significantly lower renal function after recovery (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.21, 0.49, p < 0.001, for eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min) and higher incidence of acute rejection during the first year (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11, 2.49, p = 0.015). Additional studies of therapeutic approaches to manage patients with prolonged DGF are needed.     

Decreasing plasma soluble IL‐1 receptor antagonist and increasing monocyte activation early post‐transplant may be involved in pathogenesis of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients

Sadeghi M, Daniel V, Naujokat C, Schmidt J, Mehrabi A, Zeier M, Opelz G. Decreasing plasma soluble IL‐1 receptor antagonist and increasing monocyte activation early post‐transplant may be involved in pathogenesis of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 415–423. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Delayed graft function (DGF) increases the risk of acute allograft rejection and may affect long‐term graft survival. We compared pre‐transplant, early post‐transplant, and late post‐transplant serum creatinine (Cr) and plasma levels of neopterin, cytokines, and cytokine receptors/antagonists in patients with DGF (n = 39), slow graft function (SGF) (n = 43), or immediate graft function (IGF) (n = 30). Three and eight days post‐transplant, plasma neopterin (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), Soluble Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) receptor (R) (p = 0.002; p = 0.001), and IL‐10 (p = 0.003; p = 0.001) were higher in DGF than IGF patients. One month post‐transplant, plasma neopterin (p < 0.001) and IL‐10 (p < 0.001) were higher in DGF than IGF patients. Three days post‐transplant, the results indicated reduced sIL‐1 receptor antognist (RA) production in DGF patients (p = 0.001). Simultaneously, plasma sIL‐6R and IL‐10 increased in DGF (p < 0.001; p = 0.003) and SGF (p = 0.007; p = 0.030) patients, indicating increased production of sIL‐6R and IL‐10. Lower sIL‐1 production in DGF than IGF patients early post‐transplant might promote the increased production of monocyte‐derived neopterin, sIL‐6R, and IL‐10. This monocyte/macrophage activation might induce inflammation in the graft and subsequently cause an impairment of graft function. Blocking of monocyte activity after renal transplantation may be considered a potential approach for improving graft outcome.     

Early post‐transplant conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept for prolonged delayed graft function improves renal function in kidney transplant recipients

Prolonged delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients imparts a risk of poor allograft function; tacrolimus may be detrimental in this setting. We conducted a retrospective single center analysis of the first 20 patients converted to belatacept for prolonged DGF as part of a clinical protocol as a novel treatment strategy to treat prolonged DGF. Prior to conversion, patients underwent an allograft biopsy to rule out rejection and confirm tubular injury. The primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months post‐transplant; secondary outcome was the change in eGFR 30 days post‐belatacept conversion. At 1 year post‐transplant, the mean eGFR was 54.2 (SD 19.2) mL/min/1.73 m². The mean eGFR on the day of belatacept conversion was 16 (SD 12.7) mL/min/1.73 m² and rose to 43.1 (SD 15.8) mL/min/1.73 m² 30 days post‐conversion (P<.0001). The acute rejection rate was 20% with 100% patient survival at 12 months post‐transplant. There was one graft loss in the setting of an invasive Aspergillus infection that resulted in withdrawal of immunosuppression and transplant nephrectomy. Belatacept conversion for prolonged DGF is a novel treatment strategy that resulted in an improvement in eGFR. Additional follow‐up is warranted to confirm the long‐term benefits of this strategy.     

Kidney Allograft Survival After Acute Rejection,the Value of Follow‐Up Biopsies

Kidney allografts are frequently lost due to alloimmunity. Still, the impact of early acute rejection (AR) on long‐term graft survival is debated. We examined this relationship focusing on graft histology post‐AR and assessing specific causes of graft loss. Included are 797 recipients without anti‐donor antibodies (DSA) at transplant who had 1 year protocol biopsies. 15.2% of recipients had AR diagnosed by protocol or clinical biopsies. Compared to no‐AR, all histologic types of AR led to abnormal histology in 1 and 2 years protocol biopsies, including more fibrosis + inflammation (6.3% vs. 21.9%), moderate/severe fibrosis (7.7% vs. 13.5%) and transplant glomerulopathy (1.4% vs. 8.3%, all p < 0.0001). AR were associated with reduced graft survival (HR = 3.07 (1.92–4.94), p < 0.0001). However, only those AR episodes followed by abnormal histology led to reduced graft survival. Early AR related to more late alloimmune‐mediated graft losses, particularly transplant glomerulopathy (31% of losses). Related to this outcome, recipients with AR were more likely to have new DSA class II 1 year posttransplant (no‐AR, 11.1%; AR, 21.2%, p = 0.039). In DSA negative recipients, early AR often leads to persistent graft inflammation and increases the risk of new DSA II production. Both of these post‐AR events are associated with increased risk of graft loss.     

Clinical significance of C4d deposition in stable renal allografts in the early post‐transplantation period

Abstract: The clinical significance of C4d positivity in patients with stable graft function is undetermined. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of protocol biopsy‐proven C4d‐positive renal transplants with stable graft function in the early post‐transplantation period. Protocol biopsies (n = 79) were performed on stable allografts on the 14th post‐transplant day, and indication biopsies (n = 74) were performed on dysfunctioning allografts within one yr after transplantation. Clinical and histological findings, graft function and graft survival rates were compared between C4d‐positive and C4d‐negative grafts in each group. The incidence of C4d positivity was 5.1% in protocol biopsies and 9.5% in indication biopsies. In protocol biopsies, C4d‐positive allografts showed minimal tubulointerstitial inflammation, and the graft function and graft survival rate did not differ from C4d‐negative allografts. All C4d‐positive allografts maintained stable graft function without anti‐rejection therapy, and follow‐up biopsies of two patients showed no C4d deposition or evidence of rejection. On the other hand, C4d‐positive allografts in indication biopsies showed severe tissue injury, and the graft survival rate was significantly lower than C4d‐negative allografts. In conclusion, C4d‐positive allografts with stable graft function in the early post‐transplantation period take an indolent course.     

Efficacy of early biopsy in kidney allograft recipients with delayed graft function

It is accepted that kidney transplants that display delayed graft function (DGF) show poorer survival and function, particularly when an acute rejection episode (ARE) occurs. A diagnostic biopsy to establish the reason for DGF, or acknowledge an ARE, even if borderline, can improve short- and long-term graft survivals. From January 2002 to September 2006 we retrospectively evaluated 358 kidney transplant recipients. We performed a biopsy to evaluate the cause of DGF in all patients who required dialysis, or had serum creatinine levels that increased, remained unchanged, or decreased less than 10% per day on three consecutive days during the first week after transplantation. An ARE was found in 18.8% (n = 19) of the biopsies. Early biopsy for patients with DGF is a safe method that allows uncovering of an ARE that would otherwise be undetected. The immediate recognition and treatment of rejection episodes can certainly increase long-term survival and function of renal transplants.     

Impact of mesangial IgA deposits in 14th‐post operative‐day routine renal allograft biopsies

SUMMARY: Three hundred fourteen 14th‐postoperative‐day routine renal allograft biopsies were evaluated together with clinical data. Out of 314 biopsies, mesangial IgA deposits were positive in 122 biopsies (39%). According to Banff classification, the rate of acute rejection was significantly lower in mesangial IgA deposit‐positive (IgA(+)) patients (7.4%) than in mesangial IgA deposit‐negative (IgA(‐)) patients (19.7%) on the 14th postoperative day. Thereafter, rate of biopsy‐proven and clinical acute rejection was continuously lower for up to 12 months in IgA(+) patients than in IgA(‐) patients. The detection rate of mesangial IgA deposits was significantly higher in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐well‐matched (HLA mismatch number was <3) patients than in HLA‐poorly matched (HLA mismatch number was ≥3) patients. In HLA‐well‐matched patients, the serum creatinine levels were significantly lower in IgA(+) patients than in IgA(‐) patients after 3 post‐transplant months and up to 1 post‐transplant year. Follow‐up (mean interval: 13 months) allograft biopsies were performed in 34 patients out of 122 IgA(+) patients. In the follow‐up biopsies, initially detected mesangial IgA deposits had disappeared in 22 patients (65%) out of 34 patients. Twelve patients (35%) still had mesangial IgA deposits, and all of them had clinical and pathological findings consistent with IgA nephropathy. Patients with continuous mesangial IgA deposits in the follow‐up biopsies had a better renal function at 1 year and a higher 5‐year graft survival rate compared with patients who lost the initially deposited IgA. The present study demonstrates that long‐lasting mesangial IgA deposits in renal transplants prevent allografts from acute rejection, which leads to better graft outcome.     

Similar impact of slow and delayed graft function on renal allograft outcome and function

Kidney transplant patients can be divided into three groups, according to the initial graft function. First-week dialyzed patients form the delayed graft function (DGF) group. Nondialyzed patients are divided into slow graft function (SGF) or immediate graft function (IGF) according to whether the day 5 serum creatinine was higher versus lower than 3 mg/dL, respectively. SGF patients showed worse graft survival, above higher incidence of acute rejection and lower renal function than IGF patients, although few reports have analyzed outcomes in these groups. We analyzed the impact of SGF on graft survival, first-year renal function, and incidence of acute rejection in 291 renal transplant patients. Creatinine was significantly worse at 12 months for SGF and DGF than for IGF patients (1.9 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, 1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, respectively; P < .05). There was no difference in first-year renal function between SGF and DGF. The acute rejection rate was higher among the SGF than the IGF group (45% vs 21%, P < .05), but not different from DGF patients (42%, P < .05). Graft survival was better among IGF than SGF or DGF patients, with no significant difference between the last two groups (3-year graft survival, 82%, 71%, 70%, respectively; log-rank test, P < .05). Kidney transplant recipients who develop SGF have a worse outcome than patients with IGF, similar to DGF patients. SGF patients show worse graft survival, worse renal function, and higher acute rejection rates than IGF patients, despite not needing dialysis.     

Successful steroid withdrawal guided by surveillance biopsies—A single‐center experience

Steroid withdrawal following renal transplantation is challenging and widely debated. This retrospective study aimed at investigating the frequency and determinants of successful steroid withdrawal guided by surveillance biopsies. We analyzed 156 pretransplant DSA‐negative renal transplants receiving basiliximab induction and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus‐mycophenolate‐steroids. The absence of rejection in surveillance biopsies at 3 or 6 months post‐transplant initiated steroid withdrawal, which was monitored by subsequent indication and/or surveillance biopsies. The primary outcome was the frequency of successful (i.e., rejection‐free) steroid withdrawal at 1 year post‐transplant. In the whole study population, successful steroid withdrawal was achieved in 73 of 156 patients (47%). Steroid withdrawal was initiated in 98 of 156 patients (63%) and successful in 73 of 98 patients (74%). Subsequent clinical rejection occurred in only one of 98 patients (1%), whereas 24 of 98 patients (24%) experienced subclinical rejection. Steroid withdrawal was not initiated in 58 of 156 patients (37%) mainly due to current or prior severe (Banff TCMR ≥IA) subclinical rejection. Prediction of successful steroid withdrawal by pretransplant or early post‐transplant parameters was poor. In conclusion, (sub)clinical rejection‐free steroid withdrawal can be expected in about half of pretransplant DSA‐negative patients. As successful steroid withdrawal cannot be well predicted by pre‐ and early post‐transplant parameters, guidance by surveillance biopsies is an attractive strategy.     

Clinical Implications of Initial Renal Function After Deceased Donor Transplant

The aim of this study was to investigate whether slow graft function (SGF) after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys affected the prevalence of anemia or the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We retrospectively evaluated the records of 534 kidney transplant patients who were classified based on their initial renal function, namely, immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), or delayed graft function (DGF). Among the 534 kidney transplant patients studied, the occurrences of each condition were IGF 104, SGF 133, and DGF 297. Six months after transplantation, a greater percentage of DGF patients were anemic compared with the others (P = .028). However, at 12 months after transplantation, SGF patients showed more anemia than the IGF group. DGF and SGF patients displayed similar GFR values at 18 and 24 months after transplantation. However, IGF patients displayed higher GFRs, even when subjects who experienced acute rejection episodes were censored (P = .004). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was similar among SGF and DGF patients. Patients displaying SGF after deceased-donor transplantation showed a greater tendency to be anemic than those displaying IGF. This study also suggested that SGF patients were at risk for acute rejection episodes and/or significantly reduced kidney function as measured by GFR.     

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.     

The relative influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on renal transplant survival

Three hundred and eight cadaveric renal transplants were analysed to establish the effects of acute rejection in the first 90 days and delayed graft function (DGF) on graft outcome. There were 120 patients (39%) with no DGF and no rejection (group 1), 101 patients (33%) with rejection but no DGF (group 2), 41 patients (13%) with DGF but no rejection (group 3) and 46 patients (15%) with both rejection and DGF (group 4). The actuarial 4-year graft survival rates for groups 1,2,3 and 40.4%, respectively. The acute rejection rate was 101/221 (46%) in patients with initial graft function compared with 46/87 (53%) for those with DGF (²=1.02, P=0.31). Cox stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that DGF was a more powerful predictive factor for poor graft survival (P=0.001) than acute rejection occurring in the first 90 days post-transplant (P=0.034). Further efforts at improving graft outcome should concentrate on reducing the incidence of DGF.     

An analysis of early renal transplant protocol biopsies--the high incidence of subclinical tubulitis.

To investigate the possibility that we have been underestimating the true incidence of acute rejection, we began to perform protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation. This analysis looks at the one-week biopsies. Between March 1 and October 1, 1999, 100 adult patients undergoing cadaveric kidney or kidney/pancreas transplantation, or living donor kidney transplantation, underwent 277 biopsies. We focused on the subset of biopsies in patients without delayed graft function (DGF) and with stable or improving renal function, who underwent a biopsy 8.2+/-2.6 d (range 3-18 d) after transplantation (n = 28). Six (21%) patients with no DGF and with stable or improving renal function had borderline histopathology, and 7 (25%) had acute tubulitis on the one-week biopsy. Of the 277 kidney biopsies, there was one (0.4%) serious hemorrhagic complication, in a patient receiving low molecular weight heparin; she ultimately recovered and has normal renal function. Her biopsy showed Banff 1B tubulitis. In patients with stable or improving renal allograft function early after transplantation, subclinical tubulitis may be present in a substantial number of patients. This suggests that the true incidence of rejection may be higher than is clinically appreciated.     

Effects of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Early and Long-Term Outcomes in a Single Center

Introduction

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) causes a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF), the most frequent complication in the immediate postoperative period after cadaveric donor kidney transplantation. Herein we evaluated the impact of donor and recipient characteristics on DGF development in terms of the incidence of acute rejection episodes, hospital stay, renal function, and long-term graft and patient survivals.

Materials and Methods

Between February 1998 and July 2011, 761 patients underwent cadaveric donor kidney transplantations. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis in the first week. Patients were subdivided according to initial graft function as immediate graft function (IGF) or DGF.

Results

DGF observed in 241 patients (31.6%) was associated independently with expanded criteria donors, extended cold ischemia time, Karpinsky histological score, and prior dialysis duration both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was 18.1% among the DGF group versus 1.3% in the IGF group (P < .01). DGF significantly reduced both graft and patient survivals at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months.

Conclusion

DGF was responsible for a longer hospital stay, worse early and long-term renal function, a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as reduced graft and patient survivals.     

Influence of dialysis on post-transplant events

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effect of haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) on acute rejection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival after cadaveric renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 325 patients (cyclosporin [CyA]-based therapy) who had their first cadaver renal transplant between January 1991 and December 1996 and followed up for a mean of 61 +/- 26 months. They were divided into three groups: HD, PD and CD (where both PD and HD was used for at least 3 months). Delayed graft function was diagnosed if the patient needed dialysis in the first week post-transplant while primary non-function (PNF) was diagnosed if the kidney never achieved function. Graft rejection was confirmed by biopsy; early acute rejection (EAR) was defined as acute rejection occurring before 90 days and late acute rejection (LAR) as one after 90 d. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients had PD, 117 HD and 25 CD. The mean time period in which the patients were on dialysis for PD was 24 months, HD 34.5 months and CD 50.6 months (p < 0.01). The recipients were matched for age and gender. The donor variables (age, gender and cold ischaemia time) did not differ between the groups. The mean time for the development of first acute rejection following renal transplant in each group was as follows: PD group: 68.8 d, HD group: 81.3 d and CD group: 105 d (p = 0.08). The number of patients who developed EAR was 90 (49.2%) in PD group, 51 (43.6%) in HD group and 11 (56%) in CD group (p = 0.6); the number who developed LAR was nine in PD group (4.9%), six in HD group (5.1%) and one in CD group (4%) (p = 0.9). Fifty-six patients with PD had DGF compared with 58 with HD (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the number and severity of rejection episodes or DGF based on the duration of dialysis. The 5-yr survival of patients was 79% for PD, 81% HD and 78% CD groups (p = n.s), while the graft survival for PD group was 61%, HD group 63% and CD group 74% (p = n.s). SUMMARY: We could find no difference in the patient or graft survival between patients who had pre-transplant HD, PD or CD. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes between the three groups of patients as well. However, we found a significantly higher rate of DGF in the HD versus PD patients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil, with cyclosporine and prednisone, reduces early rejection while allowing the use of less antilymphocytic agent induction and cyclosporine in renal recipients with delayed graft function

Antilymphocytic agent induction (ALAI), with antithymocyte globulin or monoclonal antibody, is generally used in renal transplantation (TX) to spare renal allografts with poor initial function from the toxic effects of cyclosporine (CsA) and/or to augment immunosuppression (IS) in the patient at a high risk for early rejection. ALAI, unfortunately, increases the cost of TX and the risk to the patient, having been associated with many adverse side effects. An IS protocol, which results in a low incidence of early rejection while using less CsA and ALAI, is a worthwhile goal.
We compare our experience with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CsA, and prednisone (MMFCP; n=62) to our azathioprine (AZA), CsA, and prednisone (AZACP; n=50) triple‐drug IS, with and without ALAI. The patient characteristics for age, race, first TX, cadaveric donor, pediatric recipient, and dialysis in the first post‐op week (DGF) were not different for the MMFCP versus AZACP groups. There were more females in the MMFCP group (51.6% versus 30.0%, p=0.022).
We report that rejection‐free survival at 6 months (RF6) was better in the MMFCP versus AZACP group (83.9% versus 60.0%, p=0.005). Less ALAI and CsA were used in the MMFCP patients. At 1 year, actuarial graft survival was 91.9% in the MMFCP group and 81.9% in the AZACP group (p=0.116). Actuarial 1‐year patient survivals were not different in the two patient groups. In the sub‐population of patients with DGF, the RF6 in the MMFCP (n=13) group was 92.3% versus 57.1% in the AZACP (n=14) group (p=0.041). The reduction in early rejection episodes in the patients on MMFCP with DGF was accomplished while using half as much ALAI and lower CsA doses and levels. The African‐American recipient sub‐population on MMFCP also demonstrated an improvement in RF6 while using less ALAI and CsA (78.6% versus 48.0%, p=0.022).
We conclude that the use of MMF‐based triple‐drug IS results in fewer rejection episodes while allowing for lower CsA levels and less ALAI, even in patients with delayed graft function.     

Daclizumab (humanized anti-IL2Ralpha mAb) prophylaxis for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the benefits of daclizumab, (Zenapax, Roche Pharmaceuticals) a humanized anti-interleukin-2Ralpha (IL-2Ralpha) monoclonal antibody, for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function (DGF). METHODS: Data from two multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trials were pooled. DGF was defined by urine output <30 cc/hour, decline in serum creatinine of <0.5 mg/dl, or the need for dialysis within the first 24 hours after transplantation. RESULTS: At one year posttransplantation, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in patients with DGF was reduced from 44% in the placebo group to 28% in the daclizumab group. (P=0.03) Prophylaxis with daclizumab also delayed the onset of the first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode in patients with DGF from 29+/-43 days in the placebo group to 73+/-70 days in the daclizumab group. (P=0.004) The graft survival rates in patients with DGF at 1 year posttransplantation were 78% in the placebo group and 82% in the daclizumab treated group. (P=ns) Three patients in the placebo-treated group with DGF experienced graft loss due to acute rejection, whereas no patients in the daclizumab-treated group with DGF had graft loss due to acute rejection. The 1-year patient survival rate in those with DGF in the placebo and daclizumab groups were 93% and 98%, respectively. (P=ns) CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab effectively reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of biopsy-proven acute rejection in this high-risk subgroup of patients with DGF after renal transplantation. Graft and patient survival rates were similar between placebo- and daclizumab-treated patients with DGF.     

Calcium levels as a risk factor for delayed graft function

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in up to 50% of renal transplants. Hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism are associated with impaired renal function. Little is known on the effects of serum calcium levels on DGF. This issue was addressed in the current study. METHODS: Patients receiving a cadaveric renal transplant between 1986 and 1996 were studied. Data on calcium metabolism and histologic characteristics of nephrocalcinosis, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and acute rejection in biopsies taken within the first week were related to the occurrence of DGF. RESULTS: The incidence of DGF in a cohort of 585 cadaveric transplants was 31%. DGF correlated independently with serum calcium levels (odds ratio [OR] 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.26] per 0.1 mmol/L). The use of calcium channel blockers before transplantation protected against DGF (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.29- 0.87]). In this selected group, we found an association with histologic signs of ATN and DGF. However, most of the biopsies also had features of acute rejection or nephrocalcinosis. Nephrocalcinosis was found in 12 of 71 biopsies and was not associated with serum calcium levels or the occurrence of DGF. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, serum calcium levels were independently associated with DGF. This could not be explained by the presence of microscopic nephrocalcinosis. Therefore, DGF is attributed to high intracellular calcium levels. Because calcium supplementation and vitamin D analogues are commonly used in dialysis practice, hypercalcemia influences long-term graft outcome by its effect on DGF. The pretransplant use of calcium channel blockers has a protective effect on the occurrence of DGF.