The comparison of ketamine with tramadol for postoperative pain relief on children following adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The comparison of ketamine with tramadol for pain control remains controversial in pediatric adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of ketamine vs tramadol for pain relief in children following adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy.Methods:We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of ketamine vs tramadol for pediatric adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effects model.Results:Six RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared to ketamine group for pediatric adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy, tramadol is associated with substantially lower CHEOPS at 1 h (SMD = 1.56; 95% CI = 0.20–2.92; P = .02; low quality) and longer first time of additional pain medication (SMD = −0.47; 95% CI = −0.74 to −0.19; P = .0008; low quality), but demonstrates no obvious effect on CHEOPS at 6 h (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI = −1.17 to 2.19; P = .55; low quality), sedation scale at 1 h (SMD = −0.80; 95% CI = −3.07 to 1.48; P = .49; low quality) or additional pain medication (RR = 1.31; 95% CI = 0.85–2.02; P = .23; moderate quality).Conclusions:Tramadol may be better to alleviate the postoperative pain after pediatric adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy.     

Analgesic comparison of dezocine plus propofol versus fentanyl plus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis

Introduction:As the adjunctive anesthesia to propofol, both dezocine and fentanyl showed some potential for gastrointestinal endoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to compare their efficacy and safety.Methods:PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dezocine versus fentanyl for the anesthesia of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were included.Results:Five RCTs involving 677 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with fentanyl plus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy, dezocine plus propofol resulted in the reduction in propofol dose(mean difference [MD] = −11.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −22.83 to −0.61; P = .04), awakening time (std. MD = −1.79; 95% CI = −3.31 to −0.27; P = .02) and hypopnea (risk ratio [RR] = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.06–0.41; P = .0002), but had no remarkable effect on induction time (MD = 1.20; 95% CI = −0.98 to 3.39; P = .28), postoperative pain score (MD = −0.38; 95% CI = −1.00 to 0.24; P = .24), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.10–1.98; P = .29).Conclusion:Dezocine plus propofol may be better for the anesthesia of gastrointestinal endoscopy than fentanyl plus propofol.     

The analgesic efficacy of pregabalin for shoulder arthroscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The efficacy of pregabalin for pain management of shoulder arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to explore the influence of pregabalin versus placebo on the postoperative pain intensity of shoulder arthroscopy.Methods:We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through November 2019 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of pregabalin versus placebo on pain control of shoulder arthroscopy. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.Results:Three randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for shoulder arthroscopy, pregabalin remarkably decreased pain scores at 0 to 1 hour (Std. MD = −0.57; 95% CI = −1.04 to −0.09; P = .02) and 12 hours (Std. MD = −0.37; 95% CI = −0.72 to −0.02; P = .04), as well as analgesic consumption (Std. MD = −1.84; 95% CI = −2.24 to −1.44; P < .00001), but showed no notable influence on pain scores at 24 hours (Std. MD = −0.54; 95% CI = −1.47 to 0.38; P = .25), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.53–1.33; P = .45), dizziness (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.89–1.47; P = .30).Conclusions:Pregabalin may benefit to pain control after shoulder arthroscopy.     

Is rifaximin better than nonabsorbable disaccharides in hepatic encephalopathy?: A meta-analysis

Background:The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of rifaximin and nonabsorbable disaccharides (NADs) in hepatic encephalopathy (HE).Methods:After the registration of the present meta-analysis on INPLASY, all procedures were performed according to PRISMA 2020. Relevant literature was retrieved on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 5, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the enrolled studies, and Review Manager software (version 5.3) was used to analyze the clinical efficacy, blood ammonia and adverse effects.Results:Six studies with 559 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the basic characteristics of the included studies. Analysis of the complete resolution of HE showed that rifaximin was better than NADs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–3.39, P = .04). However, there were no significant differences in mental status (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.92–1.18, P = .53), blood ammonia level (standard mean difference = −0.02, 95% CI = −0.40–0.02, P = .08), or drug adverse drug effects (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.10–1.77, I² = 56%, P = .24) between the rifaximin and NADs treatment groups.Conclusion:Rifaximin is not superior to NADs in the treatment of HE.     

The analgesic evaluation of gabapentin for arthroscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The efficacy of gabapentin for pain management of arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of gabapentin versus placebo on the postoperative pain intensity of arthroscopy.Methods:We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through April 2020 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gabapentin versus placebo on pain control of arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.Results:Five randomized controlled trials are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for arthroscopy, gabapentin remarkably decreases pain scores at 24 hour (standard mean difference [SMD]=-0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.15 to -0.02; P = .21), analgesic consumption (SMD = -18.24; 95% CI=-24.61 to -11.88; P < .00001), nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.84; P = .01), but has no obvious influence on pain scores at 6 h (SMD = −1.30; 95% CI = −2.92 to 0.31; P = .11) or dizziness (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.24; P = .75).Conclusions:Gabapentin is effective for pain control after arthroscopy.     

The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:The effective therapy to reduce postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) remained unknown.Objective:We attempted to manage the systematic review and a meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in potential prevention on CRBD.Methods:We performed the meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and searched the databases from Web of Sciences, Embase and referred Cochrane Library published from October 2016 to September 2020. Data extraction was carefully conducted by 2 authors, respectively. Meta-analysis that was applied synthetically concerns the incidence and severity of CRBD and the treatment effect of DEX on CRBD.Results:We acquired 5 RCTs with interventions of DEX on CRBD. Meta-analysis showed DEX has significantly reduced the incidence and severity of CRBD compared with control at 0 hour (risk ratios [RR] = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.53–0.29, P < .01), 1 hour (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.34–0.57, P < .01), and 2 hours (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.32–0.58, P < .01) and 6 hours (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.29–0.63, P < .01). DEX was also associated with lower incidence of moderate to severe CRBD at 0, 1, and 6 hours after surgery. There were no significant differences in adverse events other than bradycardia, hypotension, and hypertension.Conclusion:The 5 RCTs showed great effectiveness in reducing the incidence and severity of the early and later postoperative CRBD. Meta-analysis showed that DEX interventions were useful in preventing the early and later postoperative CRBD without significant side effects.     

Efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A protocol for meta-analysis

Background:The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following either total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty.Methods:A comprehensive literature search of several electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) was conducted to identify relevant studies. Outcomes of interest included VTE rate, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate, pulmonary embolism rate, major bleeding events, mortality rate, blood transfusion, and wound complication. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.Results:A total of 8 studies with 97,677 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with rivaroxaban, aspirin had a significantly higher incidence of DVT (RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.27, 1.72; P < .001), and decreased risk of blood transfusion (RR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.93, 0.94; P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 drugs in terms of total VTE rate (RR = 1.39%, 95%CI: 0.94, 2.05; P = .101), pulmonary embolism rate (RR = 1.64, 95%CI: 0.92, 2.92; P = .094), mortality rate (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.15, 8.27; P = .907), major bleeding (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.44, 2.27; P = .995), and wound complication rate (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.07, 1.87; P = .229).Conclusion:Our results suggested that aspirin and rivaroxaban offered similar effect in the prevention of VTE after total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. However, rivaroxaban seemed to have better effect than aspirin in reducing the risk of DVT, and aspirin was safer than rivaroxaban in decreasing the blood transfusion rate.     

Perioperative omega-3 fatty acids for liver surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The effect of perioperative omega-3 fatty acids for liver surgery remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo in patients undergoing liver surgery.Methods:We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2020, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo for liver surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.Results:Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for liver surgery, omega-3 fatty acids were associated with substantially reduced incidence of infection (odd ratio [OR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.34–0.91; P = .02), but revealed no remarkable influence on complications (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.29–1.24; P = .17), mortality (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.06–9.37; P = .83), liver failure (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.10 to 5.00; P = 0.74), biliary leakage (OR=1.24; 95% CI = 0.41 to 3.76; P = .70), bleeding (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 0.63–4.95; P = .28), or ileus (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.07–2.05; P = .27).Conclusion:Perioperative omega-3 fatty acids may be beneficial to reduce the incidence of infection after liver surgery.     

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant nimotuzumab for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Introduction:The efficacy of neoadjuvant nimotuzumab for gastric cancer remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of neoadjuvant nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for gastric cancer.Methods:We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2019, and included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for gastric cancer. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.Results:Four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. There were 128 patients included in intervention group and 131 patients included in control group. Overall, compared with chemotherapy for gastric cancer, neoadjuvant nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy showed no substantial influence on response rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.78–1.89; P = .38), disease control rate (RR = 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32–15.40; P = .42), rash (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.96–1.66; P = .10), neutropenia (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.96–1.66; P = .10), anemia (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.62–1.89; P = .78), or nausea (RR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.96–1.48; P = .12), but might improve the incidence of vomiting (RR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.03–2.50; P = .04).Conclusions:Neoadjuvant nimotuzumab might provide no additional benefits to the treatment of gastric cancer.     

Dexmedetomidine effect on delirium in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Delirium is a common postoperative complication. Many studies have found that dexmedetomidine is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effects of dexmedetomidine on POD incidence among elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia.Methods:We searched 4 electronic databases (i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to November 30, 2020, for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine in preventing the occurrence of POD in elderly patients (aged ≥60 years). The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020192114).Results:14 studies with 4173 patients showed that dexmedetomidine was significantly associated with a decreased POD incidence among elderly patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44–0.76). The incidence of POD was significantly reduced in the noncardiac surgery group (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37–0.72), when dexmedetomidine was applied during the postoperative period (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.40–0.70), and in patients received low-doses (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.34–0.87) and normal-doses (RR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.42–0.83). There were no significant differences in POD incidence in the cardiac surgery group (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.45–1.11), and when dexmedetomidine was applied during the intra- (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.29–1.01) or perioperative period (RR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.64–1.40).Conclusions:Our meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine may significantly reduce POD incidence in elderly noncardiac surgery patients and when applied during the postoperative period, in addition, both low- and normal-doses of dexmedetomidine may reduce POD incidence. However, its use in cardiac surgery patients and during the intra- or perioperative period may have no significant effects on POD incidence.     

Does polydeoxyribonucleotide has an effect on patients with tendon or ligament pain?: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

Background:Pain in the tendons or ligaments is extremely common, accounting for 30% of the causes of visiting general practitioners. Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is emerging as a new treatment for musculoskeletal pain. However, the effects of PDRN in patients with tendon or ligament pain are unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the impact of PDRN in patients with tendon or ligament pain through a meta-analysis.Methods:Electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases of all articles on PDRN treatment for patients with tendon or ligament pain published in the English language from inception until January 31, 2020. The search identified 262 citations.Results:One randomized controlled trial and 3 retrospective observational studies were included. Pain due to tendon or ligament disorders showed significant improvement after PDRN injection (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.80 to −1.06, P < .00001). In the subanalysis of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy, rotator cuff tendinopathy-induced pain significantly improved (SMD = −2.34, 95% CI = −3.61 to −1.07, P = .0003) after PDRN injection. However, there was no difference in shoulder pain and disability index score and strength of shoulder abduction in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy (shoulder pain and disability index score, SMD = 1.16, 95% CI = −1.20 to 3.52, P = .34; strength of shoulder abduction, SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = −0.03 to 0.88, P = .07).Conclusion:Effective pain relief was achieved in patients with tendon or ligament disorders after PDRN injection. To more precisely determine this effect, a meta-analysis with a larger number of clinical trials is warranted.     

Effectiveness of tocilizumab in the treatment of hospitalized adults COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Since December 2019, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread worldwide, leading to a global health threat. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients.Methods:We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to March 10, 2021 for randomized controlled trials in which patients were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab plus usual care or usual care alone in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to pool studies. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4.Results:Eleven studies with 6579 patients were included in our meta-analysis, of which 3406 and 3173 were assigned to tocilizumab and control groups, respectively. Tocilizumab significantly reduced the 28 to 30-day mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = .04), incidence of mechanical ventilation (MV) (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, P < .001), composite outcome of MV or death (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.90, P < .001), time-to-hospital discharge (hazard ratio = 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.45, P < .001), intensive care unit admission (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88, P = .006), serious infection (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.94, P = .02), and number of serious adverse events (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86, P = .004).Conclusion:Tocilizumab reduced short-term mortality, incidence of MV, composite outcome of death or MV, intensive care unit admission, serious infection, serious adverse events, and time-to-hospital discharge in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dose.     

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

Background:Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is correlated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Over the past decade, there has been an increasing interest in the relationship between OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and progression or recurrence of AF.Methods:This investigation was an analysis of studies searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, OVID, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 2020 to evaluate the recurrence or progression of AF in CPAP users, CPAP nonusers, and patients without OSA.Results:Nine studies with 14,812 patients were recruited. CPAP therapy reduced the risk of AF recurrence or progression by 63% in a random-effects model (24.8% vs 40.5%, risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57–0.85, P = .035). Compared with non-OSA patients, AF recurrence or progression was much higher in CPAP nonusers (40.6% vs 21.1%, RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.19–2.43, P = .000). However, AF recurrence or progression in the CPAP group was similar to that in the non-OSA group (24.0% vs 21.1%, RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.87–1.47, P = .001). Begg correlation test and Egger regression test revealed no publication bias in this analysis.Conclusions:OSA is a salient factor in the progression or recurrence of AF. CPAP therapy for OSA may contribute to reduction of AF in patients for whom radiofrequency ablation or direct current cardioversion is not performed.Trial Registration:The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO with a registration No. CRD42019135229.     

Single-stage intraoperative ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus preoperative ERCP Followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

ObjectivesThe optimal treatment strategy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis is still controversial. We conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the intra- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + LC procedure with the traditional pre-ERCP +  laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) procedure in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to September 2020. Published randomized controlled trials comparing intra-ERCP + LC and pre-ERCP + LC were considered. This meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager Version 5.3, and outcomes were documented by pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsEight studies with a total of 977 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding CBD stone clearance (RR = 1.03, P = .27), postoperative papilla bleeding (RR = 0.41, P = .13), postoperative cholangitis (RR = 0.87, P = .79), and operation conversion rate (RR = 0.71, P = .26). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the intra-ERCP + LC group (MD = −2.75, P < .05), and intra-ERCP + LC was associated with lower overall morbidity (RR = 0.54, P < .05), postoperative pancreatitis (RR = 0.29, P < .05) and cannulation failure rate (RR = 0.22, P < .05).ConclusionsIntra-ERCP + LC was a safer approach for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. It could facilitate intubation, shorten hospital stay, and lower postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatitis, and reduce stone residue and reduce the possibility of reoperation for stone removal.     

Association of the VEGFR2 single nucleotide polymorphism rs2305948 with glioma risk

Background:Many studies have reported a relationship between the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2305948 and glioma, but their conclusions have been controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between rs2305948 and glioma susceptibility.Methods:Inclusion criteria and a strategy for screening of original literature were created. Eligible articles on the correlation between the SNP rs2305948 and glioma were identified in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases. After extracting the data, Stata 12. 0 software was used to perform statistical analysis under 5 genetic models and to calculate the combined odds ratio (OR) value and its 95% confidence interval (CI).Results:Four case-control studies including 1595 cases and 1657 controls were entered into the study. The overall analysis showed that no obvious association existed between rs2305948 and glioma risk (allele: OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.93–1.54, P = .162; dominant: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.93–1.46, P = .174; recessive: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.94–3.15, P = .076; heterozygous: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.94–1.30, P = .226; homozygous: OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 0.92–3.29, P = .088). The subgroup analysis suggested that the SNP rs2305948 was related to glioma susceptibility under allele, dominant, recessive and homozygote models in the Asian population (allele: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.16–1.55, P < .001; recessive: OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.49–3.36, P < .001; homozygous: OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.54–3.50, P < .001).Conclusion:The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 rs2305948 gene polymorphism may be related to glioma susceptibility in the Asian population. However, the association is not clear in non-Asian populations, for which there has been less research.     

Monotherapy with mirabegron had a better tolerance than the anticholinergic agents on overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the tolerance of monotherapy with mirabegron (50 mg) on an overactive bladder, compared with a common dosage of anticholinergic agents.Materials and methods:A comprehensive search for all randomized controlled trials that evaluated the safety of mirabegron and anticholinergic agents on overactive bladder was performed, and we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials databases, Pubmed, Embase, and relevant trials from 2013.02 to 2019.10.Results:Eight studies included 5500 patients with treatment of monotherapy on overactive bladder were identified. The total number of treatment-emergent adverse events had no significantly difference between two monotherapies (RR = 0.88 95%CI: 0.76–1.01; P = .08); however, patients would have a better tolerance with mirabegron (50 mg) in adverse events of dry mouth (RR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.33–0.53; P < .01) and tachycardia (RR = 0.52; 95%CI: 0.29–0.94; P = .03); and there were no significant differences between two groups in hypertension (RR = 1.02; 95%CI: 0.80–1.30; P = .90), constipation (RR = 0.91; 95%CI: 0.65–1.26; P = 0.57), blurred vision (RR = 1.03; 95%CI: 0.60–1.77; P = 0.92), and urinary tract infection (RR = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.70–1.16; P = .41).Conclusions:Treatment-emergent adverse events in patients with overactive bladder who underwent monotherapy of mirabegron (50 mg) or the anticholinergic agents had no significant differences, but mirabegron has a better tolerance in the aspect of dry mouth and tachycardia.     

High pretreatment D-dimer level is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:High pretreatment level of D-dimer in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is commonly encountered, but the impact of high pretreatment D-dimer level on the prognosis of SCLC patients remains undetermined. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis focusing specifically on the prognostic value of high pretreatment D-dimer level in SCLC patients comprehensively.Methods:We searched systematically in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies published before January 28, 2019. Outcomes including 1-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) rates, and hazard ratios (HRs) of OS and PFS from multivariate analysis were extracted and analyzed.Results:A total of 5 cohort studies consisting of 813 SCLC patients (473 patients with high pretreatment level of D-dimer and 340 with normal level of D-dimer) were finally included for meta-analysis. We found that patients with high pretreatment level of D-dimer had significantly shorter 1-year OS (47.6% vs 79.9%; fixed effects: risk ratio [RR] = 2.506; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.948, 3.224]; P < .001) and PFS (15.8% vs 34.0%; random effects: RR = 1.294; 95% CI = [1.060, 1.579]; P = .011) rates than those with normal level of D-dimer. Moreover, high pretreatment D-dimer level was further proved to remain as an unfavorable predictor of OS (fixed effects: HR = 1.865; 95% CI = [1.469, 2.367]; P < .001; I² = 7.6%) and PFS (fixed effects: HR = 1.513; 95% CI = [1.183, 1.936]; P = .001; I² = 0.0%) in patients with SCLC.Conclusion:High pretreatment level of D-dimer was found to be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in SCLC patients. However, more studies with sufficient adjustment for confounding factors are encouraged to confirm our conclusions.     

Effects of regular breakfast habits on metabolic and cardiovascular diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Breakfast, which is considered as an important meal of the day, is being ignored by an increasing number of people as the pace of modern life accelerates. Although a large number of previous studies have reported the relationship between skipping breakfast and type 2 diabetes mellitus, most of them were cross-sectional studies. It remains unclear how skipping breakfast affects such specific cardio-metabolic diseases as hypertension, strokes and hypercholesterolemia.Methods:The protocols and reports of this meta-analysis are based on a meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiological guidelines (MOOSE). Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, and were restricted to English from the inception to May 10, 2019. All the results were obtained by RRs, and outcomes of interests should include the occurrence of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.Results:Fourteen cohort studies in total were eventually included. Compared with people having breakfast frequency_{≦3times/week}, those with a frequency_{>3 times/week} have reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, Cardiovascular Diseases, cardiovascular Mortality, hypertension and strokes, with (RR = 0.8 [95% CI: 0.7–0.91], P = .142, I² = 37.6%), (RR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.59–0.94], P < .001, I² = 89%), (RR = 0.86 [95% CI:0.75–0.99], P = .512, I² = 0%), (RR = 0.75 [95% CI:0.61–0.93], P = .643, I² = 0%), (RR = 0.87 [95% CI:0.81–0.93], P = .479, I² = 0%), (RR = 0.63 [95% CI:0.51–0.78], P = .396, I² = 0%), (RR = 0.92 [95% CI:0.86–0.98], P = .419, I² = 0.7%), and (RR = 0.89 [95% CI:0.79–0.99], P = .238, I² = 29%), respectively.Conclusions:A regular daily breakfast habit benefits the cardio-metabolism to a great extent, reducing the risk of Cardiovascular Diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, strokes, Metabolic Syndrome, cardiovascular Mortality, Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, and Abdominal obesity, while it is not significantly related to hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease regardless of gender. Nevertheless, skipping breakfast once a week may greatly reduce the benefits of cardio-metabolism. Therefore, public institutions should promote and encourage citizens to cultivate regular daily breakfast habits.     

The Efficacy and Toxicity of Paclitaxel Plus S-1 Compared With Paclitaxel Plus 5-Fu for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still a matter of debate. The chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 has been used to treat AGC or metastatic gastric cancer.We conducted a meta-analysis to compare oral S-1 and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to determine which agent was more efficacious and less toxic in combination with PTX. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PTX plus S-1 and PTX plus 5-FU in patients with AGC.Three RCTs were eligible and 352 patients were analyzed. PTX plus S-1 increased the disease control rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.30, P = 0.04) and reduced the progressive disease rate (RR = 0.62, 95% CI] = 0.39–0.98, P = 0.04) compared with PTX plus 5-FU. There was a significant decrease in nausea (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43–0.82, P = 0.001) and vomiting (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33–0.91, P = 0.02) in patients treated with PTX plus S-1.PTX plus S-1 was associated with almost equivalent safety and a lower progressive disease rate compared with PTX plus 5-FU. PTX plus S-1 is a good alternative strategy for patients who cannot tolerate a continuous intravenous infusion.     

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: A PRISMA-compliant article

Background:To investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were analyzed.Methods:We used Cochrane Library, PubMed web of science, CNKI, VIP, Medline, ISI Web of Science, CBMdisc, and Wanfang database to conduct a systematic literature research. A fixed-effects model was used to evaluate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. We conducted sensitivity analysis and analyzed publication bias to comprehensively estimate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.Results:Among 132 retrieved studies, 5 relevant RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The result showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was improved after sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, with an SMD (95% CI of 1.1 [1.01, 1.19] and P < .00001 fixed-effects model). Combined outcome indicators showed that, combined outcome indicators showed that, compared with control group, the left ventricular volume index (LAVI) (WMD = −2.18, 95% CI [−3.63, −0.74], P = .003), the E/e’ (WMD = −1.01, 95% CI [−1.89, −0.12], P = .03), the cardiovascular death (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.83, 0.96], P = .003], and the rehospitalization rate of heart failure (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.78, 0.88], P < .01) decreased more significantly, but it had no effect on renal function (WMD = 0.74, 95% CI [0.54, 1.01], P = .06).Conclusions:The present meta-analysis suggested that sacubitril-valsartan may improve the cardiac function of heart failure. Given the limited number of included studies, additional large sample-size RCTs are required to determine the long-term effect of cardiac function of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.