Developing a CNS role to meet the mental health needs of the underserved

The purpose of this article is to describe a clinical nurse specialist program that prepares psychiatric-mental health nurses for positions in today's mental health care system. Recently, there has been a national increase in psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner programs and a decrease in psychiatric-mental health-clinical nurse specialist programs. We faced the dilemma that many psychiatric-mental health nurse faculties face in this climate of mental health care delivery changes: how to best prepare psychiatric-mental health nurses for advanced practice. Because of our long history of preparing clinical nurse specialists, we believed the role was a viable one. The clinical nurse specialist role also fit with our university's mission and our beliefs regarding the importance of providing care for underserved populations. The role of the community mental health-clinical nurse specialist is described, and the economic, demographic, and mental health system changes that influenced the development of the community mental health-clinical nurse specialist role are explored. The curriculum and the impact of the program are described and evaluated. Finally, implications regarding the need and the viability of this new role in both psychiatric-mental health nursing and in other specialties as we care for clients in the community are presented.     

Advanced practice nursing role: clinical nurse specialist

The public continues to demand quality health care that focuses on the achievement of quality patient outcomes. The clinical nurse specialist is an advanced practice role that originated in the early 1900s as a result of similar public demand, and continues to evolve to meet quality health care needs. Advanced practice nurses have many opportunities to create expanded nursing roles. Orthopaedic nurses also continue to refine their practice roles, and the clinical nurse specialist is one such example.     

Mental health nursing in New Zealand primary health care

International literature and New Zealand health policy is giving increased emphasis to the role of the primary health care sector in responding to mental health issues. These issues include the need for health promotion, improved detection and treatment of mild to moderate mental illness, and provision of mental health care to some of those with severe mental illness who traditionally receive care in secondary services. These developments challenge specialist mental health nurses to develop new roles which extend their practice into primary health care. In some parts of New Zealand this process has been under way for some time in the form of shared care projects. However developments currently are ad hoc. There is room for considerable development of specialist mental health nursing roles, including roles for nurse practitioners in primary mental health care.     

Advanced practice nursing and the role of the pediatric critical care nurse practitioner

Advanced practice nursing, since its inception in the early 1960s, has constantly changed in an effort to establish standardized core graduate education, specialization of practice, and autonomy, now common in the 1990s. Nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, and certified registered nurse anesthetists have followed in the footsteps of the clinical nurse specialist by enhancing their practice through advanced education. Nurses in these advanced areas are graduating from established programs with a master's of science in nursing and a specialty in their chosen field. The pediatric critical care nurse practitioner is one such specialty. This article highlights the results of a national survey that described pediatric critical care nurse practitioner practice over a broad geographic area. With change as a constant, nurses will look to the future of advanced practice roles, which are ever changing, and continue to provide safe, quality care to patients.     

Shaping the advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nursing role: a futuristic model

As advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nursing has transitioned from earlier models of practice, elements of clinical specialist and psychiatric nurse practitioner roles are being blended to produce a new type of practitioner. The challenge of preserving mental health expertise while expanding advanced practice primary and primary mental health care competencies is addressed in several nursing education models. At New York University's Division of Nursing, faculty have designed a program around elements identified as essential to the autonomy demanded of the evolving role, knowledge, and skills basic to broad based health care and mental health care delivery with quality patient care outcomes and the competencies necessary for accountability as care providers in a changing health care delivery system. Essential elements, resources to identify them, and strategies to attain them are discussed. Approaches that promote student, clinician, and faculty development and maximize education affirm the specialty's capacity for innovation and the profession's capacity for new direction and futuristic change.     

SHAPING THE ADVANCED PRACTICE PSYCHIATRIC-MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ROLE: A FUTURISTIC MODEL

As advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nursing has transitioned from earlier models of practice, elements of clinical specialist and psychiatric nurse practitioner roles are being blended to produce a new type of practitioner. The challenge of preserving mental health expertise while expanding advanced practice primary and primary mental health care competencies is addressed in several nursing education models. At New York University's Division of Nursing, faculty have designed a program around elements identified as essential to the autonomy demanded of the evolving role, knowledge, and skills basic to broad based health care and mental health care delivery with quality patient care outcomes and the competencies necessary for accountability as care providers in a changing health care delivery system. Essential elements, resources to identify them, and strategies to attain them are discussed. Approaches that promote student, clinician, and faculty development and maximize education affirm the specialty's capacity for innovation and the profession's capacity for new direction and futuristic change.     

Psychiatric nurse practitioner versus clinical nurse specialist: moving from debate to action on the future of advanced psychiatric nursing.

The psychiatric nursing literature recently has included a proliferation of discussions regarding the nature and direction of change impacting the future of advanced practice psychiatric nursing. The debate has focused most commonly on the role of the clinical nurse specialist versus the role of the nurse practitioner. The debate has produced little in the way of outcomes other than an entrenchment of positions. The stalemate in psychiatric nursing is producing a slow but steady surrender of the boundaries of psychiatric nursing to other fields of nursing. Although advanced practice psychiatric nurses disagree on what to become and what to be called, people with conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, and other psychiatric disorders are being treated increasingly by family nurse practitioners. The time for debate has ended. Unless consensus regarding what constitutes the domain of psychiatric nursing is reached soon, the discussions will be moot because few clients will remain to be treated. This article began as a discussion between colleagues. The two authors teach at a regional state university, but they share diverse opinions regarding the substance and nature of advanced practice psychiatric nursing. These diverse views led to discussions that have implications not only for faculty practice, but for curricular design, and for decisions regarding how to best educate future nurses. The discussion developed into a presentation at the 20th Southeast Conference of Clinical Nurse Specialists. It was presented as a point-counterpoint discussion regarding this debate; one author advocated the perspective of traditional clinical nurse specialist and one advocated the perspective of a psychiatric nurse practitioner role. We conclude with a projected model of a merged role, with delineation of traditional clinical nurse specialist and nurse practitioner that must be blended for the new role.     

Delineating advanced practice nursing in New Zealand: a national survey

Background

A variety of advanced practice nursing roles and titles have proliferated in response to the changing demands of a population characterized by increasing age and chronic illness. Whilst similarly identified as advanced practice roles, they do not share a common practice profile, educational requirements or legislative direction. The lack of clarity limits comparative research that can inform policy and health service planning.

Aims

To identify advanced practice roles within nursing titles employed in New Zealand and practice differences between advanced practice and other roles.

Method

Replicating recent Australian research, 3255 registered nurses/nurse practitioners in New Zealand completed the amended Advanced Practice Delineation survey tool. The mean domain scores of the predominant advanced practice position were compared with those of other positions. Differences between groups were explored using one‐way ANOVA and post hoc between group comparisons.

Results

Four nursing position bands were identified: nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, domain‐specific and registered nurse. Significant differences between the bands were found on many domain scores. The nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist bands had the most similar practice profiles, nurse practitioners being more involved in direct care and professional leadership.

Conclusions

Similar to the position of clinical nurse consultant in Australia, those practicing as clinical nurse specialists were deemed to reflect the threshold for advanced practice nursing. The results identified different practice patterns for the identified bands and distinguish the advanced practice nursing roles.

Implications for nursing policy

By replicating the Australian study of Gardener et al. (2016), this NZ paper extends the international data available to support more evidence‐based nursing workforce planning and policy development.     

The clinical nurse specialist and nurse practitioner roles: room for both or take your pick?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to contribute to pertinent discussions regarding advanced practice nursing roles. In particular discussion will focus on the potential implications for the developing nurse ractitioner (NP) role on the existing clinical nurse specialist (CNS) roles. SETTING: The literature presented originates primarily from the United States of America (USA), United Kingdom and Australia. Specific emphasis is placed on the psychiatric/mental health nursing context. PRIMARY ARGUMENT: Amidst the confusion in terminology to describe and explain advanced, expanded or extended nursing roles, and to distinguish between the clinical nurse specialist and the nurse practitioner, there is a need to establish clarity. The need for both clinical nurse specialist and nurse practitioner roles has been hotly debated in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: The roles of clinical nurse specialist and nurse practitioner may be complementary but fulfil different functions. It is therefore important that both roles be maintained and implemented in response to consumer and health service needs.     

Clinical Specialist in Community Health Nursing: Advanced Practice Fit or Misfit?

The purpose of this paper is to address several questions and issues about the clinical specialist role in community health nursing. A brief history of the development of the clinical specialist role sets the background for a discussion of how the community health nurse specialist fits within advanced practice nursing. The rationale for including the community health nurse clinical specialist role with other specialist roles is presented. The purpose and importance of certification at the advanced practice level in community health nursing are presented. Continued discussion about these and other issues of importance for the specialty is encouraged.     

Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta-synthesis

AIMS: This paper reports a study whose aim was to identify and synthesize qualitative research studies reporting barriers or facilitators to role development and/or effective practice in specialist and advanced nursing roles in acute hospital settings. BACKGROUND: The number of clinical nurse specialist, nurse practitioner, advanced nurse practitioner and consultant nurse roles has grown substantially in recent years. Research has shown that nurses working in innovative roles encounter a range of barriers and facilitators to effective practice. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were undertaken, and relevant studies identified using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies were appraised, and their findings synthesized using Ritchie and Spencer's 'Framework' approach. RESULTS: Fourteen relevant studies were identified, mostly from the UK. They described a range of barriers and facilitators affecting specialist and advanced nursing practice. These related to the practitioner's personal characteristics and previous experience, professional and educational issues, managerial and organizational issues, relationships with other health care professionals, and resources. The factors most widely identified as important were relationships with other key personnel, and role definitions and expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Relationships with other staff groups and role ambiguity are the most important factors which hinder or facilitate the implementation of specialist and advanced nursing roles. These factors seem interlinked, and the associated problems do not appear to resolve spontaneously when staff become familiar with the new roles. In order to reduce role ambiguity and the consequent likelihood of negative responses we recommend that, when specialist and advanced nursing roles are introduced, clear role definitions and objectives are developed and communicated to relevant staff groups; these definitions and objectives should be updated as necessary.     

Economic evaluation of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles: A methodological review

BackgroundAdvanced practice nurses (e.g., nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists) have been introduced internationally to increase access to high quality care and to tackle increasing health care expenditures. While randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles, their cost-effectiveness has been challenged. The poor quality of economic evaluations of these roles to date raises the question of whether current economic evaluation guidelines are adequate when examining their cost-effectiveness.ObjectiveTo examine whether current guidelines for economic evaluation are appropriate for economic evaluations of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles.MethodsOur methodological review was informed by a qualitative synthesis of four sources of information: 1) narrative review of literature reviews and discussion papers on economic evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles; 2) quality assessment of economic evaluations of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles alongside randomised controlled trials; 3) review of guidelines for economic evaluation; and, 4) input from an expert panel.ResultsThe narrative literature review revealed several challenges in economic evaluations of advanced practice nursing roles (e.g., complexity of the roles, variability in models and practice settings where the roles are implemented, and impact on outcomes that are difficult to measure). The quality assessment of economic evaluations of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles alongside randomised controlled trials identified methodological limitations of these studies. When we applied the Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada to the identified challenges and limitations, discussed those with experts and qualitatively synthesized all findings, we concluded that standard guidelines for economic evaluation are appropriate for economic evaluations of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles and should be routinely followed. However, seven out of 15 current guideline sections (describing a decision problem, choosing type of economic evaluation, selecting comparators, determining the study perspective, estimating effectiveness, measuring and valuing health, and assessing resource use and costs) may require additional role-specific considerations to capture costs and effects of these roles.ConclusionCurrent guidelines for economic evaluation should form the foundation for economic evaluations of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles. The proposed role-specific considerations, which clarify application of standard guidelines sections to economic evaluation of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles, may strengthen the quality and comprehensiveness of future economic evaluations of these roles.     

Illuminating the clinical nurse specialist role of advanced practice nursing: a qualitative study

As the advanced practice nursing initiative in Canada gains momentum, effort is being directed towards clarifying and defining advanced practice roles. A qualitative study was undertaken to increase understanding of the clinical nurse specialist role of advanced practice. Sixteen nurses who worked in advanced practice roles, organizing and providing healthcare for children with complex health needs and their families across the continuum of care, participated in in-depth conversations about the nature of their practice, the knowledge that informs it and the factors that influence it. Findings suggest that clinical nurse specialists have a unique role in the organization and delivery of healthcare for specialized populations with complex health needs in their dual focus on the system level of healthcare and on population health needs. Initiatives directed to children and families within the study participants' specialties included program development, consultation and educational outreach and the development of clinical guidelines and policies. Although the nurses described their practice as focusing both on individual children and families and on the population of children and families within their specialty, it is at the population level that they see their greatest potential for contributing to the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective healthcare.     

A literature review of advanced clinical nursing practice in the United States of America

Advanced nursing practice in the United States of America has evolved over the past decades in two related but distinct directions:- the nurse practitioner (NP) and the clinical nurse specialist (CNS). This two-role evolution was in response to social demands for increased access to affordable, quality primary health care, and at the same time to the specialised nursing care requirements of increasingly complex patients. Thus, nurse practitioners became synonymous with primary and clinical nurse specialists with specialised, acute care. There is evidence that there is an advanced practice role for both the CNS and the NP and that much of the knowledge, skills and competencies are shared depending on the clinical situation. There have been successes and failures in the development of the two roles. The clinical nurse specialists have a more respectable image among the powerful nursing education elite, but nurse practitioners are widely recognised by consumers and other health care professionals and are valued by cost-conscious managers as a viable, cheaper alternative to physicians. The literature suggests it may well be time to take the best attributes of the two roles and merge them under the term 'advanced nurse practitioner'.     

Development of nurse specialists/advanced practitioners in Ireland

An Bord Altranais (Irish Nursing Board) published "Report of the Commission on Nursing: A Blueprint for the Future" in 1998. This report was the result of collaborative work among those involved in nursing in Ireland. It recommended the establishment of clinical career pathways, which would allow a nurse with extensive experience and advanced expertise, as well as an appropriate course, to be recognized as a clinical nurse specialist. Further advancement along this pathway could possibly enable the nurse to progress to an advanced practitioner grade. The report acknowledged that there are "various and differing interpretations" of the title "practitioner". This article explores the growth and development of the roles of the clinical nurse specialist and advanced nurse practitioners in Ireland over the past number of years. The literature reflects elements of confusion that exist in some areas about the role of a clinical nurse specialist and an advanced nurse practitioner. The "Review of the Scope of Nursing and Midwifery Practice" (An Board Altranais, 2000) recognized a lack of clear differentiation between the role of the clinical nurse specialist and the advanced nurse practitioner. Overall, some clear roles are identified for the nurse who advances or wishes to advance along clinical career pathways in nursing. However, there still appears to be a certain degree of confusion about the use of titles such as "nurse specialist" and/or "nurse practitioner". The guidelines about the level of practice and education/training required for the nurse moving along the pathways of clinical nurse specialism and/or advanced nursing practice is somewhat obscure and is interpreted in different ways in the literature.     

New Zealand general practice nurses' roles in mental health care

MCKINLAY E., GARRETT S., MCBAIN L., DOWELL T., COLLINGS S., & STANLEY J. (2011) New Zealand general practice nurses' roles in mental health care. International Nursing Review 58 , 225–233 Aim: To examine the roles of nurses in general practice interdisciplinary teams caring for people with mild to moderate mental health conditions. Background: Supporting mental health and well‐being is an important aspect of primary care. Until now nurses in general practice settings have had variable roles in providing mental health care. The New Zealand Primary Mental Health Initiatives are 26 government‐funded, time‐limited projects using different service delivery models. Methods: An analysis was undertaken of a qualitative data set of interviews, which included commentary about nurses mental health work collected from the different project stakeholders throughout a 29‐month external evaluation. Findings: Two main groups of roles for nurses within the general practice interdisciplinary team were identified: specialist mental health nurses working in newly created roles and practice nurses working in existing roles. Barriers exist to the development of the latter roles. Conclusions: Mental health care is a key role in general practice as this is where people frequently present. Internationally, nurses represent a large workforce with the potential to provide effective mental health care. This study found that attitudinal, structural and professional barriers are restricting New Zealand practice nurse role development in the care of those with mild to moderate mental health conditions. There is potential to develop their role within a structured pathway by workforce development and recognition of the value of interdisciplinary care. Given the shortage of mental health professionals this will be an important aspect of the improvement of primary mental health care.     

Definition of an advanced nursing practice role in the NICU: the clinical nurse specialist/neonatal practitioner.

We surveyed 655 health professionals affiliated with tertiary level neonatal intensive care units in Canada and the United States to define an expanded role for nurses in neonatology and to determine the educational requirements for the role. The role, comprising advanced clinical practice, educational, research, and administrative responsibilities, is a blend of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist activities. Based on survey findings, a neonatal stream within the existing Master of Health Sciences program at McMaster University was developed. To date, 15 clinical nurse specialists/neonatal practitioners (CNS/NPs) are employed in five neonatal intensive care units in Ontario and other related institutions. A randomized trial to evaluate these individuals is in progress.