A prospective observational study of anaemia management in cancer patients - results from the German Cancer Anaemia Registry

The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in cancer patients is still under debate. However, little is known about rationales, strategies, objectives, and effectiveness of anaemia treatments in common practice. The Cancer Anaemia Registry prospectively surveyed about 2000 cancer patients with anaemia throughout Germany. The main objectives of anaemia treatment regardless of modality were to improve quality of life (QOL) and to correct haemoglobin (Hb) levels. The Hb threshold for any anaemia treatment (means ± SD: 9.4 ± 1.2 g/dL) but not for blood transfusions (8.7 ± 1.0 g/dL) depended on cancer type and treatment strategy. Physicians preferred ESA as first-line treatment to prevent transfusions in patients with solid tumours, if they thought that chemotherapy caused the anaemia. If they suspected other causes or patients had lymphoproliferative malignancies, physicians preferred transfusions or attempted to correct underlying disorders; both mainly to improve QOL or prognosis. Effectiveness of all strategies was comparable. However, ESA most effectively prevented transfusions; primary transfusions appeared less suitable for correcting Hb or improving QOL. Using supportive treatments for QOL improvement was common whereas diagnostic measures and intravenous iron therapy were underused. Prospective clinical trials using QOL as end point and evaluating diagnostics in cancer-associated anaemia are warranted.     

Impact of erythropoietin on the reduction of blood transfusions and on survival of lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is a common problem in patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy and is normally associated with a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QOL), poor cancer control and diminished survival. In clinical trials, recombinant human erythropoietin has been shown to correct and prevent anaemia, decrease the need for blood transfusions and improve cancer patients' QOL. METHODS: A retrospective study followed lung cancer patients who received first-line chemotherapy in our hospital in 1998 and in 2005. The incidence of anaemia was analysed, as was the impact of incorporating erythropoietin into the treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of anaemia was 68% (69% of which reported asthenia) in 1998 vs. 54% (60% with asthenia) in 2005. The comparison of anaemia rates (1998 vs. 2005) were grade 1 (16% vs. 32%), grade 2 (36% vs. 16%), grade 3 (16% vs. 5%) and grade 4 (none). Treatment for anaemia included transfusion 52%, intravenous iron 5% and epoetin 4% in 1998. In 2005 anaemia was treated with transfusion 9%, intravenous iron 41%, and epoetin 49%. Median survival (1998 vs. 2005) was 242 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 217-329) vs. 356 days (95% CI 322-382). CONCLUSIONS: Erythropoietin is a valid alternative for cancer patients with anaemia undergoing chemotherapy. It can possibly avoid the need for transfusions without negatively impacting survival.     

The anaemia of cancer: death by a thousand cuts

Cancer has a negative systemic impact on its host in addition to its local or metastatic effects, and no cancer complication is more ubiquitous than anaemia, a condition for which there is now a specific remedy, the recombinant growth factor erythropoietin. This is not a trivial therapeutic consideration, because cancer-associated anaemia has an adverse influence on survival regardless of tumour type. However, the pharmacological correction of anaemia with recombinant erythropoietin could promote tumour growth, whereas the use of tumour-necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand as antitumour agents could exacerbate anaemia, thereby perpetuating tissue hypoxia and tumour progression.     

EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer

Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, yet it is difficult to identify a single cause due to its multifactorial aetiology. We conducted a systematic literature review (1996-2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer (see ). Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, in patients undergoing cancer surgery and following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The Hb level at which erythropoietic protein therapy should be initiated is difficult to determine as it varied between studies; a large number of Level I studies in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease enrolled patients with a Hb concentration /=90 g/L) impact upon the response to erythropoietic proteins when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. Evidence indicates that endogenous EPO concentration impacts on response in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, but is not a valid parameter in patients with solid tumours. There is Level I evidence that fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used at the start of therapy to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, but maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) occurs following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used prophylactically in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Level I evidence supports the effectiveness of erythropoietic proteins to prevenroteins to prevent anaemia in non-anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or in those undergoing cancer surgery. However, these are non-licensed indications and we do not currently recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients who have normal Hb values at the start of treatment. Additional trials are warranted, especially on the issues of iron replacement and cost-effectiveness of erythropoietic protein therapy, as well as on tumour response/progression and survival.     

Standard of care for cancer-related anemia: improving hemoglobin levels and quality of life

The introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has proven to be a major advance in the therapeutic options available for managing anemia in cancer patients. The results of placebo-controlled clinical trials and large, community-based, open-label studies have confirmed that epoetin alfa, a recombinant human erythropoietin, significantly reduces transfusion requirements, and reliably increases hemoglobin (Hb) levels in anemic (Hb level <12 g/dl) cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Increased Hb improves patients' energy level and their ability to perform the activities of daily living, as well as their overall quality of life (QOL). These findings are independent of tumor type and disease status and are comparable in patients receiving nonplatinum- and platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens. Furthermore, more than a decade of use in clinical trials and by physicians in routine clinical practice has demonstrated that epoetin alfa is safe and well tolerated when used to treat cancer patients with anemia. The availability of epoetin alfa as an alternative to transfusion has changed practices in anemia management; physicians can now treat anemia with the goal of achieving adequate Hb levels to relieve anemia-related fatigue, a major symptom contributing to decreased QOL in cancer patients. Incremental benefit analysis has shown that increasing Hb level from 11 g/dl to 12 g/dl yields the greatest improvement in QOL per 1 g/dl increase in Hb. The demonstrated efficacy of epoetin alfa for increasing Hb levels and improving patient QOL have made this agent a rationale choice for management of cancer-related anemia. Ongoing research will continue to provide new insights into best management of anemia with epoetin alfa in cancer patients.     

Management of anaemia in patients with breast cancer: role of epoetin

Many patients with breast cancer suffer from anaemia, as a consequenceof the disease itself or its treatment. Anaemia has a negativeimpact on treatment outcome and overall survival, and affectsthe quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer. Previously,cancer-related anaemia was treated with blood transfusion, butthis is inconvenient, offers only temporary improvement in haemoglobin(Hb) level and is associated with several risks. Consequently,blood transfusion is usually reserved for patients with severeanaemia (Hb levels <8 g/dl). Recombinant human erythropoietin(epoetin) is an effective and convenient treatment for cancer-relatedanaemia without the risks associated with red blood cell transfusion.Epoetin therapy effectively increases Hb levels, thereby reducingthe need for emergency blood transfusion and improving the QoLof patients with anaemia and breast cancer. Epoetin beta isalso effective for the prevention of anaemia and reduction oftransfusion requirements in patients with a high risk of developinganaemia during chemotherapy. With the increased use of dose-intensifiedchemotherapy in an attempt to improve response rates, administrationof epoetin to prevent anaemia could potentially benefit manypatients with breast cancer. Key words: anaemia, anaemia prevention, breast cancer, dose-dense chemotherapy, erythropoietin     

Mechanisms of anaemia in patients with malignancy: implications for the clinical use of recombinant human erythropoietin

Anaemia is a frequent finding in cancer and may be due to different causes. In untreated subjects, the most common type is the so-called anaemia of chronic disease, a condition characterised by excessive release of cytokines such as interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor. These peptides both inhibit erythroid marrow proliferation and blunt the normal exponential relationship between haematocrit and serum erythropoietin. Chemotherapy may cause or worsen anaemia in cancer patients. Cisplatin appears to be peculiar in that this drug can blunt erythropoietin production and cause prolonged anaemia. Controlled studies have demonstrated that recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) can ameliorate anaemia in patients with malignancy and prevent chemotherapy-induced anaemia. However, improvement of anaemia following rHuEPO treatment is seen in only a portion of cancer patients, and significant improvements of quality of life cannot be demonstrated in all responsive patients. Therefore, an important issue remains whom to treat.     

Anaemia management with epoetin alfa in lung cancer patients in The Netherlands

Anaemia seriously threatens the quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. In this article results are presented on the lung cancer population from a Dutch observational study. This study addressed the real-life situation of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-Hu-EPO or epoetin alfa) treatment in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, with a focus on efficacy. In total 781 patients were enrolled in the observational study, including 382 patients with lung cancer. At enrolment patients were receiving epoetin alfa treatment and/or patients had a haemoglobin (Hb) level 11.3g/dl) was especially effective for NSCLC patients where it resulted in a stabilization of Hb at baseline level. For SCLC patients this strategy was less effective. Furthermore, early intervention seemed to diminish the need for a blood transfusion, i.e., the higher the Hb at epoetin initiation the more patients did not receive any blood transfusion. Results from this observational study demonstrate that epoetin alfa treatment corrects chemotherapy-related anaemia in both NSCLC as well as SCLC patients. Early epoetin alfa intervention seems advantageous for lung cancer patients both in terms of maintaining adequate Hb levels during chemotherapy as well as reducing transfusions.     

European guidelines for the management of chemotherapy-induced anaemia and health economic aspects of treatment

Patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy frequently develop anaemia; platinum-based chemotherapy, in particular, leads to reduced production of the bone marrow-stimulating hormone erythropoietin. The European Cancer Anaemia Survey showed that many patients do not receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy and highlighted the need for clear guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. In response to a fast-moving therapeutic environment and guidelines produced in the USA, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer established an independent task force to develop evidence-based guidelines for the use of ESAs in European anaemic cancer patients that were first published in 2004. The guidelines recommend that, in patients receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy, ESA therapy should be initiated at haemoglobin levels of 9-11 g/dL based on the severity of symptoms (target haemoglobin concentration: 12-13 g/dL) to improve quality of life and prevent the need for red blood cell transfusions. Treatment should be maintained as long as Hb levels remain <12-13 g/dL and patients continue to show symptomatic improvement, and should be discontinued, due to marginally elevated risks of thromboembolic events, when haemoglobin levels exceed 14 g/dL. Treatment of anaemia with ESAs is cost-effective and is associated with long-term gains in quality-adjusted life years.     

Predicting cancer-associated anaemia in patients receiving non-platinum chemotherapy: results of a retrospective survey

A 2-year retrospective chart survey of 1064 patients with colorectal, breast, lung or ovarian cancer, Hodgkin's disease, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was conducted at 24 centres in France to determine the prevalence of anaemia (haemoglobin (Hb) levels < or = 120 g/l) and need for transfusion in patients who received non-platinum-based chemotherapy for more than three cycles or 3 months. Baseline Hb levels documented anaemia in 37.1% of patients (all tumour types). By cycle 3, the prevalence of anemia increased to 54.1% of patients and remained over 50% at cycle 4. At some time during chemotherapy 14.5% of patients were transfused. Predictive risk factors for anaemia requiring transfusion included low baseline Hb, decrease in Hb during the first month of chemotherapy, primary tumour site, prior blood transfusions and duration of chemotherapy. By early identification of patients at the highest risk of developing anaemia, interventions such as epoetin alfa can be employed to reduce or eliminate the need for transfusions.     

The impact of weekly dosing of epoetin alfa on the haematological parameters and on the quality of life of anaemic cancer patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the impact of once-weekly administration of epoetin alfa (Ea) on the management of anaemia and on the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eighty cancer patients with life expectancy > or = 24 weeks and haemoglobin (Hb) levels < 10.5 g/dL were studied. After an initial screening of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, Ea 40000 U once a week was administered over a period of 4 months. In case of patients with Hb level exceeding > 14 g/dL or in case of non-response, the dosage was reconsidered. Every month, data regarding Hb levels, clinical variations, changes in the chemotherapy regimen and transfusion use since the last study visit, were evaluated. The Linear Analogue Scale Assessment scale was used for the evaluation of the QOL. The readmissions to hospital rates (P < 0.002) and the transfusion use rates (P < 0.003) were significantly decreased comparatively with baseline. A mean increase from baseline to the final Hb level (P < 0.001) was established, as well as a significant improvement in the functional ability, energy and in the overall QOL (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the treatment of cancer patients with Ea once-weekly is effective and safe, improving their haematological parameters and QOL.     

Prognostic impact of haemoglobin levels in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Many patients with solid tumours suffer from anaemia, as a consequence of the disease itself or its treatment. Anaemia affects the quality of life and can have a negative impact on overall survival. The aim of the current study was to analyse the impact of haemoglobin levels on the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data from 249 women treated for operable breast tumours were included in our study. Haemoglobin (Hb) levels independently of anticancer therapy were compared for the prognostic influence on disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: A significant correlation between higher minimum Hb level during chemotherapy and the disease-free and overall survival was found. Pre-treatment haemoglobin levels had no prognostic influence on the disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The present data showed that anaemia during adjuvant chemotherapy to be a negative prognostic indicator for survival of patients with breast cancer.     

Anemia in patients with midgut carcinoid, treated with alpha interferon: effects by erythropoietin treatment on the perceived quality of life

One important side effect from alpha interferon is depression of bone marrow function and studies have shown that patients with carcinoid tumours treated with alpha interferon suffers from fatigue and impaired physical functions. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate if treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) could have a positive effect on self-rated quality of life (QoL). Eighteen patients with midgut carcinoid treated with alpha interferon were included in the study. There were statistical significant increases in haemoglobin (Hb) levels between baseline and 4 months, between baseline and 8 months as well as between baseline and 2-year follow-up. No EPO related side effects were reported. There were improvements of more than 10 points in self-rated QoL-issues related to anaemia. Even though the analysis did not reveal any statistically significant relation between the observed increase in Hb levels and self-rated QoL, this pilot study has increased the knowledge about benefits, doses and frequency of EPO treatment in patients with midgut carcinoid suffering from interferon related anaemia.     

The European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS): a large, multinational, prospective survey defining the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients

The European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS) was conducted to prospectively evaluate the prevalence, incidence and treatment of anaemia (haemoglobin <12.0 g/dL) in European cancer patients, including the relationship of mild, moderate and severe anaemia to performance status. Patients were evaluated for up to 6 months. Data (N=15367) included demographics, tumour type, performance status, haemoglobin levels, cancer treatments and anaemia treatments. Prevalence of anaemia at enrollment was 39.3% (haemoglobin <10.0 g/dL, 10%), and 67.0% during the survey (haemoglobin <10.0 g/dL, 39.3%). Low haemoglobin levels correlated significantly with poor performance status. Incidence of anaemia was 53.7% (haemoglobin <10.0 g/dL, 15.2%). Anaemia was treated in 38.9% of patients (epoetin, 17.4%; transfusion, 14.9%; and iron, 6.5%). Mean haemoglobin to initiate anaemia treatment was 9.7 g/dL. Anaemia prevalence and incidence in cancer patients are high. Anaemia significantly correlates with poor performance status and many anaemic patients are not treated.     

Recombinant human erythropoietin in oncology: current status and further developments.

Anaemia effects up to 90% of cancer patients, with more than 60% requiring blood transfusion during or after treatment. With the advent of recombinant human erythropoietins (rHuEPO), an alternative to red blood cell transfusion has become available. So far, three drugs have been approved for the treatment of anaemia in patients with malignancies (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa). New concepts for the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients include 3- and 4-weekly dosing, as well as loading-dose concepts. Important factors helping to judge the impact of erythropoietin in cancer treatment include pharmacoeconomics and better predictive factors. Lately, the influence of erythropoietin therapy on survival in cancer patients has been discussed very intensively, because conflicting data have emerged. Studies aimed at correcting anaemia in cancer patients had indicated a possible survival advantage of those patients receiving erythropoietin. In contrast, two recent trials aimed at correction of haemoglobin levels beyond anaemia reported a poorer survival of patients receiving erythropoietin. This might grossly be attributed to a higher risk of thrombosis in these patients. The largest systematic review on the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients undergoing treatment indicates a suggestive but not significant survival advantage of erythropoietin-treated patients. In addition, very recent results of a Food and Drug Administration meeting on safety and survival of patients treated with erythropoietin are presented.     

Impact of haemoglobin levels during adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with primary breast cancer

Tumour anaemia is a common symptom in cancer patients, particularly in those receiving chemotherapy. The aim of the current study was to analyse the impact of haemoglobin levels on the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 129 patients were available for analysis. The estimated median five-year overall survival rate was 76.6%. Mean Hb prior to primary surgery was 13.8 g/dl (SD 1.09), pre-chemotherapy Hb 12.8 g/dl (SD 1.2), and nadir Hb during chemotherapy 11.0 g/dl (SD1.1), respectively. Hb values were analysed as continuous variables in the Cox model. Survival analyses did not show a correlation between preoperative and pre-chemotherapy Hb levels with patient outcome. However, univariate analysis identified low nadir Hb (p=0.008), larger tumours (p=0.042), and hormone-receptor-negative tumours (p=0.022) to be significantly associated with poor patient survival. This result was persistent when analysis was adjusted for relevant prognostic factors in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Nadir Hb, 1.54-fold increased risk for death (95% CI 1.03-2.32), and tumour size, 3.2-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.17-8.77) remained as independent variables, whereas hormone-receptor status failed to retain significance. The present data showed anaemia during adjuvant chemotherapy to be associated with poor survival in patients with primary breast cancer. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to examine the value of correcting anaemia with regard to improve disease control and survival.     

Cancer-related anemia

Anemia has a high prevalence in patients with cancer. Its frequency and severity depend on tumor type, tumor stage, duration of disease, and treatment status. The etiology of cancer-related anemia is multifactorial and includes myelotoxicity of treatment, bone marrow infiltration, impaired erythropoietin production, blood loss, and the anemia of chronic disease. Anemia affects health-related quality of life (QOL) and may impact on tolerance or even outcome of anticancer therapy. Despite its high prevalence and impact on QOL, anemia is often under-recognized and under-treated. Treatment should correct etiologic factors, whenever possible. Symptomatic treatments are red blood cell transfusions and administration of erythropoietic growth factors. Transfusions result in rapid improvement of anemia-related symptoms but are usually only given to patients with moderate to severe anemia. Administration of epoetins (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta) or darbepoetin alfa increases hemoglobin levels, reduces the need for blood transfusions, and improves QOL in patients with cancer-related anemia. Trials determining the exact association of anemia with both response to chemo(radio)therapy and survival are ongoing. Physicians should be aware of the clinical relevance of and treatment options for anemia in cancer patients.     

Incidence of anaemia in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

Anaemia is frequent in breast cancer patients but often remains undiagnosed and untreated. To determine the incidence of anaemia a prospective survey of primary non-metastatic breast cancer patients who received at least four cycles of adjuvant, non-platinum multi-agent chemotherapy was conducted at 47 centres in Austria. Two hundred and forty seven patients were prospectively included between October 1999 and December 1999. Haemoglobin (Hb) levels were determined after surgery and prior to each cycle of chemotherapy. Treatment of anaemia (blood transfusion or epoetin alfa) during the observation period was at the physician's discretion. For the purpose of this study, patients were considered to be anaemic if their Hb was below 12 g/dl. At baseline (after surgery and before the first cycle of chemotherapy), 28.7% of all patients were anaemic. The only significant differentiating factor was the type of surgery. 37.9% of patients who underwent mastectomy were anaemic, whereas only 22.8% of patients who underwent breast conserving surgery were anaemic. Forty two percent of 176 patients with a Hb level of 12 g/dl at baseline developed anaemia during adjuvant chemotherapy. The only factor that significantly influenced the development of anaemia during chemotherapy was the Hb level at baseline. The total incidence of anaemia in patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy was 58.7%. Forty nine patients (20.2%), 48 patients (19.2%) and 48 patients (19.2%) showed a decrease in Hb levels by 1 g/dl, 1–2 g/dl and >2 g/dl, respectively. Only 18.6% of the patients who were found to be anaemic received anaemia treatment. The two most important factors for developing anaemia are the kind of surgery and the Hb level prior to chemotherapy.     

The impact and management of anaemia in haematological malignancies

Anaemia is a common disorder in patients with cancer, occurring in 10-40% of cases, depending upon the tumour type and chemotherapy used. It is present in nearly all patients with leukaemia at some time in the disease and in 50% of patients with lymphoma after chemotherapy. Cancer-related anaemia appears to result from a range of factors including chronic inflammation, blood loss, nutritional deficiencies, haemolysis, bone marrow infiltration by malignant cells, low serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels, and a decrease of bone marrow responsiveness to EPO. The consequences of anaemia, namely fatigue and cardiovascular symptoms, can adversely affect patients' quality of life and may even alter their response to cancer treatment. Moreover, anaemia is often associated with the presence of several adverse prognostic parameters and is also itself a predictor of poor prognosis. Furthermore, anaemia and its symptoms can be exacerbated by cancer treatment. Until recently, blood transfusions have been the mainstay of treatment for cancer-related anaemia, despite the associated risks of transfusion-related reactions and transmission of infection. By increasing haemoglobin levels and haematocrit, treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been shown to reduce the need for blood transfusion in patients with haematological malignancies. It is recommended that rHuEPO be administered when a patient's haemoglobin level is at risk of falling below 8g/dL, and that treatment is maintained until levels rise above 13g/dL. Consideration of the detrimental effects of anaemia on cancer patients' physical and emotional well-being and therapeutic outcome suggests that rHuEPO therapy has the potential to provide substantial clinical benefits.     

Clinical benefits of epoetin alfa therapy in patients with lung cancer

A retrospective subset analysis of anemic lung cancer patients who participated in three large, multicenter, community-based studies of 3-times-weekly (TIW) or once-weekly (QW) recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO, epoetin alfa) as an adjunct to chemotherapy was conducted. Patients were treated with epoetin alfa 150 U/kg in the first TIW study and with 10,000 U subcutaneously in the other study, with doubling of the dose if hemoglobin (Hb) response was inadequate. Patients in the QW study received epoetin alfa 40,000 U subcutaneously, which could be increased to 60,000 U. The maximum treatment duration for all three studies was 16 weeks. A total of 1748 lung cancer patients were evaluable for hematopoietic response; 1298 were evaluable for analyses of energy and 1300 were evaluable for analyses of activity and overall quality of life (QOL), as measured by the linear analogue scale assessment (LASA). Within 2 months of therapy, TIW and QW epoetin alfa therapy resulted in significant increases in Hb levels, decreases in transfusion requirements, and improvements in self-reported LASA scores. Increased Hb levels and reduced transfusion rates were demonstrated in the individual studies and in the analysis of data pooled from all three studies. Improvements in QOL parameters were significantly correlated with increased Hb levels. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated in all studies. The clinical benefits and safety profiles of the TIW and the QW schedules appear to be similar. In addition, the QW schedule provides greater convenience to patients and physicians alike. Given the high incidence of anemia and transfusion utilization in patients presenting with lung cancer, epoetin alfa is an effective strategy for correcting anemia in these patients, thereby improving their energy levels, activity levels, and overall QOL.