Advancing community health through community health partnerships

Improving a community's health is a key goal of health services organizations. Effectively pursuing that goal requires health services organizations to create partnerships with other organizations to help identify community health needs and to create and carry out programs that bring together community members and needed health services. Drawing on community systems concepts and a recent study of community health partnership efforts in three cities, this article provides a framework for such partnerships. Types of partnerships described include: Community action partnerships, in which the partnership forms to address a specific problem or pursue a specific opportunity. Community organization partnerships, in which a set of organizations in a similar service sector agree to collaborate for mutually agreed upon goals; and Community development partnerships, in which a partnership attempts to increase participation by people and organizations in collaborative activities that advance the community on multiple fronts or that contribute to community assets and services in multiple areas. The article also describes how the pressures to create large integrated delivery systems can affect creation of partnerships to improve community health. Increasingly, healthcare leaders are being held accountable for the health of communities they serve. When creating partnerships for community health and carrying out health-improvement activities, leaders should be aware of and respond to four key dimensions of accountability: political accountability, commercial accountability, clinical/patient accountability, and community accountability.     

Community perspectives on roles and responsibilities for strengthening primary health care in rural Ethiopia

Abstract Government-community partnerships are central to developing effective, sustainable models of primary health care in low-income countries; however, evidence about the nature of partnerships lacks the perspective of community members. Our objective was to characterise community perspectives regarding the respective roles and responsibilities of government and the community in efforts to strengthen primary health care in low-income settings. We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups (n=14 groups in each of seven primary health care units in Amhara and Oromia, Ethiopia, with a total of 140 participants) in the context of the Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative. Results indicated that community members defined important roles and responsibilities for both communities and governments. Community roles included promoting recommended health behaviours; influencing social norms regarding health; and contributing resources as feasible. Government roles included implementing oversight of health centres; providing human resources, infrastructure, equipment, medication and supplies; and demonstrating support for community health workers, who are seen as central to the rural health system. Renewed efforts in health system strengthening highlight the importance of community participation in initiatives to improve primary health care in rural settings. Community perspectives provide critical insights to defining, implementing and sustaining partnerships in these settings.     

Community perspectives on roles and responsibilities for strengthening primary health care in rural Ethiopia

Abstract

Government–community partnerships are central to developing effective, sustainable models of primary health care in low-income countries; however, evidence about the nature of partnerships lacks the perspective of community members. Our objective was to characterise community perspectives regarding the respective roles and responsibilities of government and the community in efforts to strengthen primary health care in low-income settings. We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups (n=14 groups in each of seven primary health care units in Amhara and Oromia, Ethiopia, with a total of 140 participants) in the context of the Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative. Results indicated that community members defined important roles and responsibilities for both communities and governments. Community roles included promoting recommended health behaviours; influencing social norms regarding health; and contributing resources as feasible. Government roles included implementing oversight of health centres; providing human resources, infrastructure, equipment, medication and supplies; and demonstrating support for community health workers, who are seen as central to the rural health system. Renewed efforts in health system strengthening highlight the importance of community participation in initiatives to improve primary health care in rural settings. Community perspectives provide critical insights to defining, implementing and sustaining partnerships in these settings.     

Terrorism and emergent challenges in public health

The authors explore the complexity of challenges facing the public health community in an era increasingly defined by terrorism. The public health and associated political structure in this country has much to do to better coordinate its' efforts in an effective way. Solutions will ultimately come from partnerships between government agencies, community organizations, the business community, and international interests.     

Public–Private Collaboration in Health and Human Service Delivery: Evidence from Community Partnerships

The collaboration among public–private partnerships that applied to the Community Care Network (CCN) demonstration program of the Hospital Research and Educational Trust is examined. These partnerships link broad-based community coalitions with health and human service providers in efforts to improve community health and local service delivery. Although they willingly collaborated in identifying community health needs, coordinating services, and reporting to the community, partnership participants showed less alacrity in joining forces to reduce redundancy and increase efficiency. Such patterns suggest that organizations might best profit from working together on activities that maintain existing power relations and that have the potential to add prestige and attract new clients. Collaboration in these areas may be essential to building a foundation of trust that leads to future cooperation in more sensitive areas.     

Multisectoral lessons from healthy communities

The healthy communities movement can provide insight into population health efforts in the United States, particularly in the context of recent health care reform. The movement has evolved from multisector partnerships that focused on improving the health, well-being, and quality of life for people and the social determinants of health to partnerships that focus more on chronic disease prevention, health equity, and environmental change. Evaluating the effects of community programs on population health has been challenging for a number of reasons. More metrics need to be developed for population health that will address inequities and focus policies on long-term health effects.     

Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?

BACKGROUND: Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zone of the North West Public Health Observatory to assess the needs of local users and producers of public health information. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with 42 representatives of three major groups in Merseyside and Cheshire: community groups, public-health-related professionals in the local statutory and academic sectors, and information specialists within the National Health Service. RESULTS: Different groups of users and producers encountered different problems in accessing health information. Community groups had significant problems accessing and interpreting health information and were concerned about tokenism and the failure of professionals to recognize lay knowledge. Professionals experienced difficulties in accessing local information from outside their agency and had concerns over partnerships failing to work together to share information. The health information specialists stressed the danger of providing information without supporting intelligence, the difficulty of keeping track of the many local sources, and the importance of having access to local authority data sources. All three groups relied on their own networks in their search for information, and these should not be overlooked in any dissemination strategy. CONCLUSION: Information requires skilled interpretation to become policy-relevant public health intelligence. This research identified major problems in the communication of lay health knowledge and in the accessibility of public health intelligence.     

It's not just who you are but where you live: an exploration of community influences on individual HIV status in rural Malawi

Approximately 1 million people are infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Malawi. Despite efforts aimed at changing individual risk behaviors, HIV prevalence continues to rise among rural populations. Both previous research and the Political Economy of Health framework suggest that community-based socio-economic factors and accessibility may influence HIV transmission; however, these community factors have received little empirical investigation. To fill this gap, this research uses data from a nationally representative probability sample of rural Malawians combined with small area estimates of community socio-economic and accessibility data in logistic regression models to: 1) reveal relationships between community factors and individual HIV status; 2) determine whether these relationships operate through individual HIV risk behaviors; and 3) explore whether these associations vary by gender. Community socio-economic factors include relative and absolute poverty; community accessibility factors include distance to roads, cities, and public health facilities. Individual HIV risk behaviors include reported condom use, sexually transmitted infections, multiple partnerships, and paid sex. Results show that higher community income inequality, community proximity to a major road, and community proximity to a public health clinic are associated with increased odds of HIV for women. For men, community proximity to a major road and community proximity to a public health clinic are associated with increased odds of HIV infection. These direct relationships between community factors and individual HIV status are not mediated by individual HIV risk behaviors. The Political Economy of Health frames the discussion. This study provides evidence for expanding HIV prevention efforts beyond individual risk behaviors to consideration of community factors that may drive the HIV epidemic in rural Malawi.     

Establishing and sustaining community–university partnerships: A case study of quality of life research

Community is a key construct in population health research and a major locus of health determinants study. In recent years in Canada, a new emphasis on such research has emerged in the form of community–university partnerships, supported by several of the major research granting agencies. The authors regard such partnerships as a special case of participatory action research (PAR), albeit one where greater emphasis is placed on the institutional nature of the university research partner. Drawing from the first three years’ experience of a local quality of life study, and the extant North American literature on community–university partnerships, this article explores how such partnerships are established and sustained. These processes are illustrated with critical reflections on some of the methods, actions and relational issues that arose during the authors’ quality of life project. The article concludes with a brief reflection on the potential benefits and costs of the growing Canadian trend to require such partnerships as a condition for research grants.     

Communities of solution: the Folsom Report revisited

Efforts to address the current fragmented US health care structure, including controversial federal reform, cannot succeed without a reinvigoration of community-centered health systems. A blueprint for systematic implementation of community services exists in the 1967 Folsom Report--calling for "communities of solution." We propose an updated vision of the Folsom Report for integrated and effective services, incorporating the principles of community-oriented primary care. The 21st century primary care physician must be a true public health professional, forming partnerships and assisting data sharing with community organizations to facilitate healthy changes. Current policy reform efforts should build upon Folsom Report's goal of transforming personal and population health.     

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Current Status of Partnerships between the Food Banking and Healthcare Systems to Address Food Insecurity in the U.S.

One in eight people in the U.S. experience food insecurity (FI). To date, the food banking sector has been at the forefront of efforts to address FI, but the healthcare sector is becoming increasingly involved in such efforts. The extent of collaboration between the two sectors remains unclear. We explored food banking stakeholders’ views on the current state of partnerships between the two sectors. We used purposive sampling to recruit ten key informants for semi-structured interviews. We also conducted a national online survey to gather data from food bank directors (n = 137). Thematic analysis generated two major themes: (1) Healthcare and food banking stakeholders are coordinating to achieve collective impact, and (2) Food banking-healthcare partnerships are leveraging various resources and vested interests within the medical community. We found evidence of ongoing partnerships between the two sectors and opportunities to strengthen these partnerships through the support of backbone organizations.     

Building community capacity in public health: the role of action-oriented partnerships.

Public health practice increasingly is concerned with the capacity and performance of communities to identify, implement, strengthen, and sustain collective efforts to improve health. The authors developed ways to assist local Turning Point partnerships to improve their community public health system as a secondary outcome of their work on the expressed needs of the community. Using focus groups, meeting minutes, attendance records, and meeting observation, the authors fed information back to the partnerships on systems change. A public health systems improvement plan supportive of local partnerships' work on specific health issues was funded and the collaborative research agenda was further refined.     

Meeting the needs of rural populations through interdisciplinary partnerships

This article describes the organization and outcomes of a Rural Health Outreach Initiative (RHOI) designed to increase collaboration between the medical education and health care delivery sectors to improve the quality of health care delivery and health outcomes in rural communities. Two inter-related partnership strategies were utilized in rural communities to address the health and social service needs of rural populations. The partnerships were created through the efforts of a rural health professions education program located in a community-based medical school. The two partnership models were implemented at the same time and target the same rural populations. Both strategies relied upon interdisciplinary collaborations to achieve their goals and outcomes. One strategy involved the creation of partnerships among rural medical students and the projects they initiate, using the model of community oriented primary care (COPC). The second strategy involved the establishment of partnerships by a variety of rural, community-based entities that resulted from a three-year Health Resources and Services Administration Rural Health Outreach grant that supported a "mini-grant" program. This article summarizes the process and results of these innovative collaborations that occurred at two levels: (1) between health and service institutions representing multiple disciplines and (2) between academic institutions and local communities. Specific attention is given to projects that resulted from the work of the partnerships that address the needs of older adults residing in the rural communities. The two strategies are compared and implications for the success of similar efforts are discussed.     

The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice

Community health partnerships (CHPs) are voluntary collaborations of diverse community organizations that have joined forces in order to pursue a shared interest in improving community health. Although these cross-sectoral collaborations represent a way to address social determinants of health and disease in society, they suffer from governance and management problems associated with interorganizational relationships in general and health care challenges specifically. A typology of effective governance and management characteristics provides a systematic, theoretically based way of addressing dimensions of governance and management and serves as a guide in constructing, maintaining, and measuring successful partnerships. It offers a multidisciplinary perspective for classifying important organizational issues, identifying barriers to successful development and sustainability, and facilitating the attainment of goals.     

Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research: the role of community and partnership capacity.

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) increasingly is being used to study and address environmental justice. This article presents the results of a cross-site case study of four CBPR partnerships in the United States that researched environmental health problems and worked to educate legislators and promote relevant public policy. The authors focus on community and partnership capacity within and across sites, using as a theoretical framework Goodman and his colleagues' dimensions of community capacity, as these were tailored to environmental health by Freudenberg, and as further modified to include partnership capacity within a systems perspective. The four CBPR partnerships examined were situated in NewYork, California, Oklahoma, and North Carolina and were part of a larger national study. Case study contexts and characteristics, policy-related outcomes, and findings related to community and partnership capacity are presented, with implications drawn for other CBPR partnerships with a policy focus.     

Public health and business: a partnership that makes cents

Historically, public health agencies have had relatively few formal partnerships with private business. However, both groups share an interest in ensuring a healthy population. Businesses have a financial interest in supporting organized public health efforts; in turn, business partnerships can increase the reach and effectiveness of public health. This paper makes the case for the business sector's participation in the broad public health system and its support of governmental public health agencies. Examples of past and current partnerships exemplify how public health efforts benefit business and suggest opportunities for future collaboration to improve the public's health.     

MAPP in Chicago: a model for public health systems development and community building.

The Chicago Department of Public Health's (CDPH's) community planning efforts came from a city-wide strategic plan that called for the establishment of a city-wide network of community partnerships that focus on community needs and resource assessment and program development. Using Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships as a framework for planning at the community level, the CDPH supports five community coalitions through the Chicago Center for Community Partnerships. The overall goal of the Center is to increase community capacity, build new partnerships, provide coalitions with access to decision makers, and inform the role of local public health agencies in supporting this type of work. Bringing together a wide spectrum of stakeholders, coalition members work to conduct assessments and develop and implement strategies. While coalitions demonstrate outcomes related to specific strategies, they also exhibit infrastructure-level results, with increased levels of community organizing, leveraging of existing resources, and new systems for information dissemination. Simultaneously, the CDPH has gained new partners in public health, increased collaboration, and more information about communities. These outcomes are contingent on certain elements of success: (1) committed leadership; (2) commitment to a new way of doing business; (3) prepared public health workforces; and (4) community readiness.     

Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research

Over the past several decades there has been growing evidence of the increase in incidence rates, morbidity, and mortality for a number of health problems experienced by children. The causation and aggravation of these problems are complex and multifactorial. The burden of these health problems and environmental exposures is borne disproportionately by children from low-income communities and communities of color. Researchers and funding institutions have called for increased attention to the complex issues that affect the health of children living in marginalized communities--and communities more broadly--and have suggested greater community involvement in processes that shape research and intervention approaches, for example, through community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships among academic, health services, public health, and community-based organizations. Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research (Children's Centers) funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were required to include a CBPR project. The purpose of this article is to provide a definition and set of CBPR principles, to describe the rationale for and major benefits of using this approach, to draw on the experiences of six of the Children's Centers in using CBPR, and to provide lessons learned and recommendations for how to successfully establish and maintain CBPR partnerships aimed at enhancing our understanding and addressing the multiple determinants of children's health.     

A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community health partnerships: Collaboration-versus issue-oriented approaches

Broad-based community partnerships are seen as an effective way of addressing many community, health issues, but the partnership approach has had relatively limited success in producing measurable improvements in long-term health outcomes. One potential reason, among many, for this lack of success is a mismatch between the goals of the partnership, and its structure/membership. This article reports on an exploratory, empirical analysis relating the structure of partnerships to the types of issues they address. A qualitative analysis of 34 “successful” community health partnerships, produced two relatively clear patterns relating partnership goals to structurel membership: (1) “collaboration-oriented” partnerships that included substantial resident involvement and focused on broader determinants of health with interventions aimed at producing immediate, concrete community improvements; and (2) “issueoriented” partnerships that focused on a single, typically health-related issue with multilevel interventions that included a focus on higher-level systems and policy change. Issue-oriented partnerships tended to have larger organizations governing the partnership with resident input obtained in other ways. The implication of these results, if confirmed by further research, is that funders and organizers of community health partnerships may need to pay closer attention to the alignment between, the membership/structure of a community partnership and its goals particularly with respect to the involvement of community residents.