A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH, Focalin) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to test an a priori hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of action than d,l-threo-methylphenidate (d,l-MPH). METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind study conducted at 12 U.S. centers. One hundred thirty-two subjects received d-MPH (n=44), d,l-MPH (n=46), or placebo (n=42) twice daily for 4 weeks, with titration of the dose based on weekly clinic visits. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to last study visit on teacher-completed Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale (Teacher SNAP). Secondary efficacy measures included the change on parent-completed SNAP (Parent SNAP), Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) score, and Math Test performance. Assessments at home in late afternoon were included to test the hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of efficacy than d,l-MPH. Safety was assessed through monitoring occurrence and severity of adverse events and discontinuations related to them. RESULTS: Treatment with either d-MPH (p=.0004) or d,l-MPH (p=.0042) significantly improved Teacher SNAP ratings compared with placebo. The d-MPH group showed significant improvements compared with placebo on the afternoon Parent SNAP ratings (p=.0003) and scores on the Math Test (p=.0236) obtained late in the afternoon at 6:00 p.m. Sixty-seven percent of patients showed improvement on d-MPH and 49% on d,l-MPH based on CGI-I scores. Both d-MPH and d,l-MPH were well tolerated, no patient in the d-MPH group and only two patients each in the d,l-MPH and placebo groups discontinued the study. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of ADHD, an average titrated dose of 18.25 mg/day of d-MPH is as efficacious and safe as an average titrated dose of 32.14 mg/day of d,l-MPH. Both active treatments have large effect sizes. Thus, d-MPH and d,l-MPH appear to provide similar efficacy, and d-MPH may have longer duration of action after twice-daily dosing, but additional studies are needed to determine the statistical and clinical significance of this possibility.     

Bupropion XL in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Data remain limited on treatment strategies for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an extended-release, once-daily formulation of bupropion (XL) in the treatment of adults with ADHD. METHODS: This multisite, placebo-controlled, 8-week prospective trial evaluated 162 adult patients diagnosed with ADHD (combined and inattentive types). Subjects were treated with up to 450 mg/day of bupropion XL. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of ADHD responders (defined as at least a 30% reduction in the investigator-rated ADHD Rating Scale score) at week 8 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]). RESULTS: Bupropion XL responders (53%) exceeded placebo responders (31%) (p =.004 at week 8) with a significantly greater proportion of bupropion XL responders as early as week 2 (p = .01). Treatment effect size calculated for the ADHD Rating Scale total score was .6. Bupropion XL appeared to provide sustained benefit throughout the day compared with placebo (morning p =.033, afternoon p =.004, evening p = .024). Bupropion XL was safe and well tolerated, with no serious or unexpected adverse events and a low rate of drug-related study discontinuation (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this multisite study indicate that bupropion XL is an effective and well-tolerated nonstimulant treatment for adult ADHD.     

Modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study followed by abrupt discontinuation

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this fixed-dose study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of modafinil (modafinil film-coated tablets) in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In addition, the effect of abrupt discontinuation of modafinil was evaluated in a 2-week observation period. METHOD: Patients aged 6 to 17 years with DSM-IV-TR-defined ADHD were randomly assigned to 7 weeks of double-blind treatment with modafinil or placebo in a 2:1 ratio, followed by abrupt discontinuation of modafinil and a 2-week, double-blind observation period in which 46% of patients receiving modafinil were switched to placebo without tapering and half continued to receive modafinil. Study drug was administered once daily and titrated over the first 7 to 9 days to daily doses of 340 mg for patients < 30 kg or 425 mg for patients > or = 30 kg. Assessment instruments included the Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) School and Home Versions and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I). The study was conducted from November 2003 to June 2004. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were randomly assigned to receive modafinil (340 mg, N = 44; 425 mg, N = 82) or placebo (N = 64). 189 patients were evaluated for safety. Modafinil significantly improved symptoms of ADHD as shown by reductions in ADHD-RS-IV School Version total scores compared with placebo at all visits (p < or = .009), including the final visit of the double-blind phase (p < .0001). With modafinil, ADHD-RS-IV School Version mean total scores changed from 37.8 at baseline to 29.3 at week 1 and 20.7 at final visit; corresponding placebo values were 36.6, 32.8, and 28.4, respectively; effect size at final visit was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.88). Total scores on the ADHD-RS-IV Home Version were also significantly reduced at all visits (p < or = .022) and final visit (p = .001) in patients receiving modafinil compared with those receiving placebo. Significantly higher proportions of patients receiving modafinil were rated "much improved" or "very much improved" in overall clinical condition (CGI-I) at all visits compared with patients receiving placebo (p < .001). No withdrawal symptoms were observed when modafinil was abruptly discontinued at the beginning of the final 2-week observation period. Modafinil was generally well tolerated. Insomnia, headache, and decreased appetite were the most commonly reported adverse events. Sixty-three percent of patients who received modafinil completed the study; 13% discontinued because of lack of efficacy; 10%, because of adverse events; and 13%, for other reasons (e.g., consent withdrawn, lost to follow-up). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved symptoms of ADHD both at school and at home and was well tolerated by children and adolescents. Abrupt discontinuation of modafinil was not associated with symptoms of withdrawal or with rebound of symptoms of ADHD.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of modafinil in children and adolescents, ages 7 to 17, with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: In this 9-week, double-blind, flexible-dose study, patients were randomized to once-daily modafinil (170-425 mg) or placebo. Assessments included ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) School and Home Versions and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were randomized. Modafinil produced significant reductions in ADHD-RS-IV total scores at school (n = 128; mean change +/- SD: -17.5 +/- 13.1 points) compared with placebo (n = 66; -9.7 +/- 10.3 points; p < .0001). Similarly, modafinil reduced ADHD-RS-IV total scores at home compared with placebo (-17.6 +/- 13.3 versus -7.5 +/- 11.8 points; p < .0001). Fifty-two percent of patients randomized to modafinil and 18% of those randomized to placebo met prestudy criteria for responder on the CGI-I (p < .0001). Randomization to modafinil was associated with significantly more insomnia, headache, decreased appetite, and weight loss than randomization to placebo, but discontinuation attributed to adverse events did not differ statistically between treatment groups (modafinil, 5%; placebo, 6%). CONCLUSION: Modafinil was well tolerated and reduced ADHD symptoms at school and home compared with placebo.     

Open-label study of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

BACKGROUND: This pilot study examined the efficacy and duration of the effect of dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) given once-daily in subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Subjects aged 6-18 years (inclusive) with ADHD were enrolled in this 8-week, openlabel study. Outcome measures included the Conners'Teacher and Parent Rating Scales, the Attention Deficit Disorder Rating Scale (ADDRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, and teacher and parent visual analog scales to estimate the duration of efficacy. d-MPH was initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg/day. The dose was flexible, based on response and tolerability, and could be increased in increments of 2.5 mg/day to a maximum daily dose of 30 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (mean age, 8.7 +/- 0.4 years) were treated. Significant improvements (p <0.0001) from baseline occurred in the Conners' Teacher and Parent Rating Scales after 8 weeks. Of the evaluated subjects, 85.7% (18 of 21) showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale, and 86.4% (19 of 22) of subjects showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale. Most subjects demonstrated an improvement on the ADDRS and the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Median duration of effect was estimated at 6.2 hours (teachers) and at 7.5 hours (parents). On average, patients gained 2.4 pounds over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single daily dose of d-MPH was effective in controlling ADHD in children and was well tolerated. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate chronic dosing with d-MPH.     

Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, randomized, fixed-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated efficacy of extended-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH-ER) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Randomized adults with ADHD (n=221) received once-daily d-MPH-ER 20 mg, 30 mg, or 40 mg or placebo for 5 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to final visit in DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) total score. Secondary efficacy parameters included the proportion of patients with improvement>or=30% in ADHD-RS total score and final scores on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. RESULTS: Of 218 evaluable patients, 184 completed the study. All d-MPH-ER doses were significantly superior to placebo in improving ADHD-RS total scores. Placebo scores improved by 7.9; d-MPH-ER, 20 mg, improved by 13.7 (p=.006); d-MPH-ER, 30 mg, improved by 13.4 (p=.012); and d-MPH-ER, 40 mg, improved by 16.9 (p<.001). Overall distribution of CGI-I ratings at final visit was significantly better with each d-MPH-ER dosage than with placebo. There were no unexpected safety or tolerability concerns, based on experience with racemic methylphenidate (MPH) in adults and dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) in children. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily d-MPH-ER at 20 mg, 30 mg, or 40 mg is a safe and effective treatment for adults with ADHD.     

Comparative pharmacodynamics and plasma concentrations of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride after single doses of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover laboratory school study in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE: Methylphenidate has four optical isomers due to two asymmetries (erythro-threo and dextro-levo). The initial commercial formulation eliminated the erythro isomer, but the dextro-levo asymmetry was racemic, with equal amounts of d and l-threo isomers (d,l-MPH). Previous work has suggested that the d-threo isomer methylphenidate (d-MPH) rather than the l-threo isomer (l-MPH) is responsible for the clinical effects in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study compared the efficacy of acute equimolar doses of d-MPH and dl-MPH in reducing ADHD symptoms over an 8-hour period in a laboratory school setting and investigated the relationship of efficacy to plasma levels of MPH. METHOD: Thirty-two children with ADHD enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, and 31 completed the study. On seven separate occasions separated by at least 6 days, the children received a single morning dose of d-MPH (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), d,l-MPH (5, 10, or 20 mg), or placebo and then were observed in a laboratory classroom setting for 8 hours. At specified intervals, blinded observers rated behavior, and the children performed a computerized math test. The plasma levels of MPH were related to the response to study medication. The safety profiles of the two formulations were compared. RESULTS: For both formulations, the responses to both MPH preparations were dose related, the plasma concentrations of l-MPH were negligible and of d-MPH were indistinguishable, and clinical efficacy was highly correlated with plasma concentrations of d-MPH. The efficacy of the d-isomer was equivalent to the racemic preparation in reducing ADHD symptoms and increasing academic productivity. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of MPH resides in the d-isomer. The elimination of the l-isomer does not diminish the efficacy of an acute dose of methylphenidate.     

A post hoc analysis of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (focalin) versus d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (ritalin)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical measures of the benefit/risk ratio in a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH) and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d,l-MPH). METHOD: Data from a phase III clinical trial was used to compare equimolar doses of d-MPH and d,l-MPH treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on clinician ratings of improvement/deterioration, teacher ratings of remission, and duration of action. RESULTS: d-MPH was clinically and statistically significantly superior to d,l-MPH on clinician's dimensional ratings of global improvement, teacher ratings of remission of ADHD symptoms and parent 6:00 p.m. ADHD symptom ratings. No treatment differences were observed for symptom ratings at 3:00 p.m. and for 6:00 p.m. math test performance. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the two drugs may have distinct profiles on the measures analyzed. Because d-MPH may have be more than twice the potency of d,l-MPH, the differences reported here are only applicable to the doses of the study drugs involved in the clinical trial. The results are limited by the exploratory nature of our analysis, small samples, and multiple analyses. The findings are suggestive that further study is warranted to look at these differences prospectively but cannot be used to draw clinical conclusions at this time.     

A controlled study of nortriptyline in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy and tolerability of nortriptyline (NT) in the treatment of pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODOLOGY: Subjects were outpatient children and adolescents with ADHD ascertained from clinical referrals. Subjects were enrolled in a 6-week open study in which NT was titrated to 2 mg/kg/day as tolerated over 2 weeks. Using either a 30 % reduction in the ADHD rating scale or a score of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for ADHD improvement, responders to treatment were then randomized into a 3-week, controlled discontinuation phase. During this phase, subjects either continued on their current dose of NT or were tapered to placebo under double-blind conditions. Subjects were monitored for symptoms of ADHD, oppositionality, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: Of the 35 subjects enrolled in the study, 32 completed the open phase and 23 completed the discontinuation phase. The mean dose of NT was 80 mg (1.8 mg/kg/day), resulting in a serum level of 81 ng/ml. At the conclusion of the open 6-week study, NT was related to a significant reduction in ADHD (p < 0.001) and oppositional symptoms (p < 0.001). At the conclusion of the discontinuation phase, the 12 subjects randomized to NT had significantly lower scores on the DSM-IV ADHD symptom checklist than those 11 subjects randomized to placebo (31 versus 21; t = 2.2; p < 0.04). No significant adverse events were observed, and children were noted to have weight gain during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that NT is effective in reducing symptoms not only of ADHD but also of oppositionality. This group of children and adolescents tolerated robust dosing of NT well, with few clinical or cardiovascular adverse events.     

A comparison of once-daily and divided doses of modafinil in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of several modafinil dosing regimens in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to determine whether modafinil can be given once daily in pediatric ADHD. METHOD: Children and adolescents (age range, 6-13 years) (N = 248) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD were enrolled in a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted February-May 2002. The group was assigned to receive oral (100-mg tablets) modafinil 300 mg once daily (300 mg in the morning followed by placebo at midday), modafinil 300 mg as a divided dose (100/200 mg or 200/100 mg), or matching placebo. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, a higher dose of 400 mg (200/200 mg) was evaluated. Efficacy measures included the teacher-rated School Version and clinician-rated Home Version of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and the parent-completed Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales. RESULTS: 223 children completed the study. Those who received modafinil 300 mg once daily showed a significantly greater improvement (change from baseline) than those who received placebo in symptoms of ADHD across all rating scales and subscales (all p < .05). Divided 300-mg doses of modafinil provided some significant but inconsistent improvements in ADHD symptoms. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, modafinil 400 mg (200/200 mg) was significantly superior to placebo on clinician- and parent-completed scales (all p < .05). Insomnia was the only adverse event to occur with significantly greater frequency in a modafinil group (200/100) than in the placebo group (14% vs. 2%) (p = .03). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved ADHD symptoms in children. Once-daily dosing (300 mg) provided the most consistent improvement in symptoms. All dosing regimens of modafinil were well tolerated.     

Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended release (d-MPH-ER) was compared to placebo in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-phase study included 97 patients (ages 6-17 years) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD. The study was carried out between 2001 and 2003. After a 2-week evaluation phase, patients were randomized to d-MPH-ER or placebo for 7 weeks. Flexible d-MPH-ER dosing (30 mg/day) was permitted for 5 weeks, then patients remained on their optimal dose during the last 2 study weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to final rating in Conners ADHD/DSM-IV Scale-Teacher version (CADS-T) total subscale score. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline to final visit in CADS-T Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive subscale scores, CADS-P DSM-IV total subscale score and Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive subscale scores, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) and CGI-Severity (CGI-S) scale scores, and Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 scores. RESULTS: d-MPH-ER improved CADS-T total scores significantly compared with placebo (p <.001), and 67.3% of d-MPH-ER patients were rated much improved or very much improved on CGI-I at final visit versus 13.3% of placebo patients (p <.001). More patients taking d-MPH-ER (49.1%) than placebo (25.5%) spontaneously reported adverse events suspected as drug related. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily d-MPH-ER was more effective than placebo in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.     

Mirtazapine for obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open trial followed by double-blind discontinuation

BACKGROUND: Many patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) experience little response to standard treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Mirtazapine enhances serotonergic function by a mechanism distinct from reuptake inhibition. Because a pilot study suggested effectiveness of mirtazapine in OCD, we conducted a controlled trial. METHOD: We recruited 30 subjects, 15 treatmentnaive and 15 treatment-experienced, with DSM-IV OCD of > or =1 year's duration and a Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of > or =20. In the 12-week, open-label phase, subjects received mirtazapine starting at 30 mg/day and titrated over 2 weeks as tolerated to 60 mg/day. At week 12, responders (YBOCS score decrease > 25%) were randomly assigned, double-blind, to continue mirtazapine or switch to placebo for 8 weeks, including a 1-week, double-blind taper week for placebo subjects. RESULTS: In the open-label phase, the mean +/-SD YBOCS score fell from 28.3 +/-3.7 to 20.3 +/-8.5 (paired samples t = 4.81, p < .0001). Four subjects (13.3%) discontinued for side effects. Sixteen subjects (53.3%) (8 treatmentnaive, 8 treatment-experienced) were responders and 15 agreed to randomization. Response was independent of comorbid mood disorders. In the 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation phase, the mirtazapine group's mean YBOCS score fell a mean +/-SD of 2.6 +/-8.7 points while the placebo group's mean score rose a mean +/-SD of 9.1 +/-7.5 points (Mann Whitney U = 6.5, p = .005, 1-tailed). All other outcome measures were consistent with mirtazapine's superiority versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine may be an effective pharmacotherapy for OCD. If our results are replicated, larger double-blind studies would be indicated.     

Safety and tolerability of oral paliperidone extended-release tablets in elderly patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with six-month open-label extension.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this multicenter, international study was to evaluate safety and tolerability of paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in elderly (age > or =65 years) patients with schizophrenia. The authors conducted a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, optional 24-week open-label extension study. Interventions consisted of flexible, once-daily doses of paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day; 6-mg starting dose, adjusted in 3-mg dose increments) or placebo (2:1) during double-blind treatment and paliperidone ER only during open-label treatment. Measurements included adverse events, laboratory tests, physical examinations, 12-lead electrocardiograms, movement disorder rating scales, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression scale. The study was not powered to show statistical differences. RESULTS: Patients (N = 114) were predominantly female (73%); mean age was 70 years (double-blind phase). Concomitant disease presence was consistent with that of an older population. During the double-blind phase, discontinuation rates resulting from adverse events were similar between groups (paliperidone ER: 7%, placebo: 8%) as were incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (paliperidone ER: 67%, placebo: 71%). Serious adverse events occurred in 3% of the paliperidone ER- and 8% of the placebo-treated patients. Elevated prolactin levels occurred in approximately one half of patients. No prolactin- or glucose treatment-related adverse events or noteworthy mean changes in body weight (0 kg [standard deviation: 2.1] and 0 kg [standard deviation: 2.3] for paliperidone ER and placebo, respectively) were observed. Safety and tolerability results in the extension were consistent with the shorter-term results. Efficacy measures did not show consistent statistical improvement between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day) treatment over a 30-week period was generally well-tolerated and may improve symptom severity in elderly patients with schizophrenia.     

A double-blind comparison of risperidone, quetiapine and placebo in patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of atypical antipsychotics (risperidone or quetiapine) with placebo and with each other in recently exacerbated patients with schizophrenia requiring hospitalization. METHODS: This international, randomized, double-blind study included a 2-week monotherapy phase followed by a 4-week additive therapy phase. Recently exacerbated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV) were randomized (2:2:1) to risperidone (n = 153), quetiapine (n = 156), or placebo (n = 73). Target doses were 4 or 6 mg/day of risperidone and 400 or 600 mg/day of quetiapine by day 5, with the ability to increase to 600 or 800 mg/day of quetiapine on day 8. The main outcome measures were the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and need for additional psychotropic medications. RESULTS: Monotherapy Phase: The combined atypical antipsychotic group (n = 308) reached borderline superiority to placebo (n = 71) at the 2-week endpoint on mean change in total PANSS score (-24.1 +/- 1.2 and -20.2 +/- 2.0, respectively; p = 0.067). The change in the atypical group was driven by the improvement with risperidone (-27.7 +/- 1.5 vs. -20.2 +/- 2.0 with placebo, p < 0.01; and vs. -20.5 +/- 1.5 with quetiapine, p < 0.01); the improvement with quetiapine was similar to placebo, p = 0.879. Results were similar on other efficacy endpoints. Additive Therapy Phase: Additional psychotropics were prescribed to fewer (p < 0.01) risperidone (36%) than quetiapine (53%) or placebo patients (59%). The overall discontinuation rate was 18%, 26%, and 38%, respectively. Risperidone, compared with placebo, was associated with more parkinsonism, akathisia, plasma prolactin changes, and weight gain; while quetiapine was associated with more somnolence, sedation, dizziness, constipation, tachycardia, thyroid dysregulation, and weight gain. CONCLUSION: While the combined atypical antipsychotic group did not experience greater improvements than the placebo group, risperidone, but not quetiapine, was significantly superior in all measured domains to placebo in the management of recently exacerbated hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with no unexpected tolerability findings.     

Methylphenidate blood levels and therapeutic response in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: I. Effects of different dosing regimens

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Methylphenidate (MPH) is a drug of choice for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), although its use has been complicated by its short duration of action. The development of ideal long-acting preparations requires detailed understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of complex dosing regimens. The purpose of this study was to ascertain if administration paradigms that produce stable or rising MPH levels alter the rate with which MPH is absorbed, and to determine how effectively long-acting administration paradigms compare with thrice daily administration of immediate-release MPH. METHOD: Forty-eight boys diagnosed with ADHD (mean age 10.6 +/- 1.1 year) participated in this double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and efficacy and of 1 mg/kg/day MPH administered in five different paradigms and placebo. Objective measures of activity and attention (McLean Motion Attention Test; M-MAT) and plasma measures of d- and l-MPH were obtained hourly during the course of a 12-hour laboratory session. RESULTS: The rate of absorption and elimination of d-MPH was dependent on the pattern of administration, particularly on the initial bolus concentration. This suggests that d-MPH may act on the gastrointestinal system to slow absorption of additional d-MPH. There were significant differences among regimens on time course and degree of therapeutic response. Pulsatile administration produced greater improvement than escalating levels.     

Bupropion sustained release in adolescents with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and depression

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupropion sustained release (SR) is effective and well-tolerated in adolescents with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression. METHOD: Subjects were 24 adolescents (aged 11-16 years old) with ADHD and either major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder. After a 2-week, single-blind placebo lead-in, subjects were treated for 8+ weeks with bupropion SR at doses flexibly titrated up to 3 mg/kg b.i.d. (mean final doses: 2.2 mg/kg q A.M. and 1.7 mg/kg q P.M.). Outcomes were global improvement in ADHD and depression (clinician-rated), along with changes in depressive symptomatology (parent- and child-rated), ADHD symptomatology (parent- and teacher-rated), and functional impairment (parent-rated). RESULTS: Clinicians rated 14 subjects (58%) responders in both depression and ADHD, 7 (29%) responders in depression only, and 1 (4%) a responder in ADHD only. Compared with post-placebo ratings, final parents' (p < .0005) and children's (p = .016) ratings of depressive symptomatology improved significantly, as did parents' (p < .0005) but not teachers' (p = .080) ratings of ADHD symptomatology. Final ratings of functional impairment improved significantly from enrollment (p < .0005). No subject discontinued medication because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion SR may be effective and well-tolerated in adolescents with comorbid ADHD and depressive disorders. However, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 26-week trial of aripiprazole in recently manic patients with bipolar I disorder

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of aripiprazole in preventing relapse of a mood episode in recently manic- or mixed-episode patients with bipolar I disorder stabilized on aripiprazole. METHOD: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study enrolled patients from 76 centers in 3 countries (Argentina, Mexico, United States) from March 2000 to June 2003. Bipolar I disorder (DSM-IV) patients who had recently been hospitalized and treated for a manic or mixed episode entered an open-label stabilization phase (aripiprazole monotherapy: 15 or 30 mg/day, 6-18 weeks). After meeting stabilization criteria (Young Mania Rating Scale score of < or = 10 and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of < or = 13 for 6 consecutive weeks), 161 patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole or placebo for the 26-week, double-blind phase. The primary endpoint was time to relapse for a manic, mixed, or depressive episode (defined by discontinuation caused by lack of efficacy). RESULTS: Aripiprazole was superior to placebo in delaying the time to relapse (p = .020). Aripiprazole-treated patients had significantly fewer relapses (25%) than placebo patients (43%; p = .013). Aripiprazole was superior to placebo in delaying the time to manic relapse (p = .01); however, no significant differences were observed in time to depressive relapse (p = .68). Weight gain (> or = 7% increase) occurred in 7 (13%) aripiprazole-treated and 0 placebo-treated patients. Adverse events (> or = 5% incidence and twice that of placebo) reported by aripiprazole-treated patients were akathisia, pain in the extremities, tremor, and vaginitis. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole, 15 or 30 mg/day, was superior to placebo in maintaining efficacy in patients with bipolar I disorder with a recent manic or mixed episode who were stabilized and maintained on aripiprazole treatment for 6 weeks, as shown by a longer time to relapse.     

Atomoxetine for hyperactivity in autism spectrum disorders: placebo-controlled crossover pilot trial

OBJECTIVE: To explore placebo-controlled efficacy and safety of atomoxetine (ATX) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). METHOD: Children ages 5 to 15 with ASD and prominent ADHD symptoms were randomly assigned to order in a crossover of clinically titrated ATX and placebo, 6 weeks each, separated by 1-week washout. Slopes for each condition were compared by paired t test. RESULTS: In 2004-2005, 12 boys and 4 girls (7 with autistic disorder, 1 Asperger's, 8 pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified) all completed at least 3 weeks of each condition. On the primary outcome, the Hyperactivity subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, ATX was superior to placebo (p =.043, effect size d = 0.90). It was also superior on a 0 to 3 rating of nine DSM-IV ADHD hyperactive/impulsive symptoms (p =.005, d = 1.27), but missed significance on nine inattentive symptoms (p =.053, d= 0.89). Nine subjects responded to ATX, four to placebo (25% improvement on the Hyperactivity subscale plus Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement of 1-2. One was rehospitalized for recurrent violence on ATX. Adverse events were otherwise tolerable, with no tendency to stereotypy. CONCLUSIONS: ATX appears safe and effective for treating hyperactivity in some children with autism spectrum disorders. The effect appears as large as in a multisite methylphenidate trial in the same population, with fewer intolerable side effects. Further study in autism spectrum disorders is indicated.     

Cognitive and behavioral effects of multilayer-release methylphenidate in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacodynamics of a new multilayer-release (MLR) formulation methylphenidate (MPH; Biphentin) with immediate-release (IR) MPH (Ritalin) in a double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Patients were randomized to equivalent doses of MPH as MLR (once per day), IR (twice per day) or placebo. Each treatment was taken for 1 week prior to repeated behavioral and cognitive laboratory evaluations on a single day in each phase of the crossover. RESULTS: Two girls and 15 boys 6.8-15.3 years old (mean age 11.3 +/- 2.2 years) participated. Both MLR and IR MPH significantly reduced the Stop Signal Reaction Time (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0005), the Errors of Omission on the Continuous Performance Task (p = 0.0039, p = 0.0001), the IOWA-Conners Inattention/Overactivity Index (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001), and increased the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Efficacy Index (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0017) and reduced the CGI Global Improvement Index (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0006) compared to placebo. Mild adverse events were experienced by 4, 6, and 3 patients on placebo, IR, and MLR MPH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MLR MPH given once daily produces equivalent improvements in behavioral and cognitive measures, and has a duration of effect at least as long as that of IR MPH given twice daily.     

Topiramate for the treatment of binge eating disorder associated with obesity: a placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: In a single-center, placebo-controlled study, topiramate reduced binge eating and weight in patients with binge eating disorder (BED) and obesity. The current investigation evaluated the safety and efficacy of topiramate in a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Eligible patients between 18 and 65 years with >or= 3 binge eating days/week and a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 50 kg/m2 were randomized. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients enrolled; 13 failed to meet inclusion criteria, resulting in 195 topiramate and 199 placebo patients. Topiramate reduced binge eating days/week (-3.5 +/- 1.9 vs. -2.5 +/- 2.1), binge episodes/week (-5.0 +/- 4.3 vs. -3.4 +/- 3.8), weight (-4.5 +/- 5.1 kg vs. .2 +/- 3.2 kg), and BMI (-1.6 +/- 1.8 kg/m2 vs. .1 +/- 1.2 kg/m2) compared with placebo (p < .001). Topiramate induced binge eating remission in 58% of patients (placebo, 29%; p < .001). Discontinuation rates were 30% in each group; adverse events (AEs) were the most common reason for topiramate discontinuation (16%; placebo, 8%). Paresthesia, upper respiratory tract infection, somnolence, and nausea were the most common AEs with topiramate. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study in patients with BED associated with obesity demonstrated that topiramate was well tolerated and efficacious in improving the features of BED and in reducing obesity.