Adult ABO-incompatible liver transplantation, using A and B donors

BACKGROUND: The longer waiting time for a liver graft in patients with blood group O makes it necessary to expand the donor pool for these patients. This applies in both urgent situations and for elective patients. We report on our experience with ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using A2 and B non-secretor donors here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2005, 12 adult blood group O recipients (seven male/five female) received ABO-incompatible cadaveric liver grafts (10 A2 donors, two B non-secretor donors). The indications were either rapid deterioration of liver function or hepatocellular cancer, in blood group O recipients, where an ABO-identical/compatible graft was not available. Mean recipient age was 54+/-8 (mean+/-SD) yr. All pre-operative CDC crossmatches were negative. The initial immunosuppression was induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (n = 3), interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (n = 3) or anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) (n = 1), followed by a tacrolimus-based protocol. Three patients underwent plasmapheresis post-transplantation. Baseline biopsies were taken before or immediately after reperfusion of the graft and after grafting when clinically indicated. No pre-operative plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption or splenectomies were performed. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival was 10/12 (83%) and 8/12 (67%), respectively, with a 6.5-month median follow-up (range 10 days to 109 months). Two patients (B non-secretor grafts) died of multiorgan failure probably because of a poor condition before transplantation. Three patients were retransplanted. Causes of graft loss were bacterial arteritis (n = 1), death with a functioning graft (n = 1) and portal vein thrombosis (n = 2). In one of the patients with portal vein thrombosis, an anti-A titer increase occurred concomitantly, and ABO incompatibility as the cause of the thrombosis cannot be excluded. Seven acute rejections occurred in five patients and all were reversed by steroids or increased tacrolimus dosage. The pre-transplant anti-A titers tested against A1 red blood cells were 1 to 128 (NaCl technique) and 4 to 1024 (indirect antiglobulin technique, IAT); the maximum postoperative titers were 16 to 2048 (NaCl) and 256 to 32,000 (IAT). CONCLUSION: The favorable outcome of A2 to O grafting, with a patient survival of 10/10 and a graft survival of 8/10, makes it possible to also consider this blood group combination in non-urgent situations. The use of non-secretor donor grafts is interesting but has to be further documented. There was no hyperacute rejection or increased rate of rejection. Anti-A/B titer changes seem not to play a significant role in the monitoring of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation.     

Safe transplantation of blood type A2 livers to blood type O recipients

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of blood type A subgroup 2 (A2) livers into non-A recipients has not been reported previously. A2 to O renal transplantation has been reported, with early results including some accelerated rejections and graft losses. This has led some to selectively offer A2 renal transplantation only for patients with low anti-A titers. Given the different clinical behavior of liver allografts to preformed antibody, we felt that such restriction was unnecessary. METHODS: We performed six cases of A2 to O liver transplantation with no augmented immunomodulation or restriction with regard to antibody titers. Clinical courses, anti-A titers, rejection rates, and graft and patient survival were evaluated. RESULTS: All six patients had high pretransplant anti-A titers (>1:8), and all six grafts functioned normally. There were nine rejections in the six patients, of which three were severe (steroid-resistant) and five were late (>90 days). No rejection was vascular, and no grafts were lost, with mean follow-up of 665 days. In one patient who had anti-A antibody measured at the time of rejection IGM titers increased from baseline. Currently all patients are home with normal function. CONCLUSIONS: We found that transplantation of blood group A2 livers into blood group O recipients is safe and can be performed without graft loss and without regard to anti-A titer level. The rate of acute cellular rejection is high in this small series, and a significant proportion of these events were late or required OKT-3. We did not rely on plasmapheresis or anti-A titer determinations. However, the potential for late rejection prompts us to consider the addition of a third immunosuppressive agent. The transplantation of A2 livers into O recipients can partially compensate for the more frequent use of O livers in recipients from other blood groups.     

ABO-incompatible live donor renal transplantation using blood group A/B carbohydrate antigen immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 antibody treatment

BACKGROUND: Blood group ABO-incompatible live donor (LD) renal transplantation may provide a significant source of organs. We report the results of our first 14 cases of ABO-incompatible LD renal transplantation using specific anti-A/B antibody (Ab) immunoadsorption (IA) and anti-CD20 monoclonal Ab (mAb) treatment. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL: Recipients were blood group O (n = 12), A (n = 1) and B (n = 1). Donors were A1 (n = 2), A2 (n = 3), A2B (n = 1) and B (n = 8), and all were secretor positive. Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Ab panel reactivity was negative in all recipients except one. All recipients were pre-treated with 3 to 6 IA sessions, using A or B carbohydrate antigen columns, until their anti-A1/B RBC panel indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) titers were < or =8. CDC crossmatch was negative in all cases. Recipients received preoperative mycophenolic acid, and steroids/tacrolimus were started at transplantation. No splenectomy was performed. Eight recipients received one dose of anti-CD20 mAb (rituximab, 375 mg/m2) pre-operatively and 11 recipients had postoperative protocol IA. RESULTS: In the initial protocol, anti-CD20 mAbs were used only for recipients receiving A1 grafts. One B graft (HLA-identical donor, 84% panel reactivity) was lost in a severe anti-B Ab-mediated acute rejection. Subsequently, the protocol included anti-CD20 for recipients of both A1 and B grafts and postoperative protocol IA to all recipients. The subsequent 10 grafts had excellent function, giving a total graft survival of 13/14 (observation range 2 to 41 months). At 1 yr, mean serum creatinine was 113 micromol/l (n = 8) and mean glomerular filtration rate was 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 24 to 77). In the remaining five cases, with less than 1 yr follow up, mean serum creatinine was 145 micromol/l at 2 to 9 months follow up. Pre-IA anti-A/B titers were in the range of 2 to 32 (NaCl technique) and 16 to 512 (IAT). More than 90 IA sessions were performed in 14 recipients without any significant side effects. Recipient anti-A/B titers returned after transplantation to pre-IA levels or slightly lower. Postoperative renal biopsies were performed in 10 patients. In the 13 patients with long-term function, one patient experienced cellular rejection (Banff IIB) at 3 months without anti-B titer rise. This rejection was concomitant with low tacrolimus plasma levels and was easily reversed by steroids. In 8 of 10 cases, C4d staining was positive in peritubular capillaries. CONCLUSION: Blood group ABO-incompatible LD renal transplantation using A and B carbohydrate-specific IA and anti-CD20 mAbs has excellent graft survival and function.     

Current experience with renal transplantation across the ABO barrier.

Solid organ transplantation has traditionally been governed by the rules of blood group compatibility. Thus, it has been demonstrated that crossing the ABO blood group barrier generally results in hyperacute rejection. However, the A2 subtype of the blood group A is a weaker antigen. Under certain circumstances, organs from donors with blood group A2 can be transplanted across the ABO blood group barrier into recipients of O or B blood type. Since 1986, 33 patients including 24 blood group O and 9 blood group B patients received A2 (30) or A2B (3) donor kidneys. Both cadaver donor (31) and living-related grafts (2) have been undertaken. The mean follow-up since transplantation for the 21 patients with functioning grafts is 36 months, with a 67.2% current graft survival. Immunosuppression for these transplants consisted of azathioprine, prednisone, and cyclosporine, often in combination with prophylactic OKT3 or antilymphocyte globulin as protocol dictated. Special immunosuppressive protocols such as splenectomy or plasmapheresis were not used. The serum of the potential recipient was analyzed for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) forms of antibody against A1 and A2 red blood cells. There is a strong correlation between a low (less than or equal to 1:8) anti-A1 IgG titer and both early and long-term graft function. Recipients with an IgG titer greater than 1:8 in the pretransplant serum had a much higher incidence of early graft failure. We no longer recommend transplantation of A2 kidneys into O or B recipients with a pretransplant titer of greater than 1:8 but found that recipients with low titers have graft function rates essentially equal to those of ABO-compatible patients. Patients with blood group B have, over time, lower anti-A IgG titers than do blood group O patients. In addition, the graft survival among blood group B patients is 89% compared with 58% among group O recipients. This may be due to the generally low titers found in blood group B recipients. Since instituting a policy in 1988 of not transplanting the kidney when the anti-A IgG titer is greater than 1:8, the survival in O patients is 88%. We recommend the screening of all organ donors with blood group A for the A2 subgroup and believe that transplantation can be safely and successfully performed in certain patients with blood group O or B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Lack of correlation between results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation and anti-ABO blood type antibody titers under our current immunosuppression

In this study, we examined the impact of preoperative anti-A/B antibody titers on the results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation (LKT). In all, 167 recipients underwent ABO-incompatible LKT at our institution between 1989 and 2002. These patients were subdivided into those transplanted under cyclosporine with azathioprine or mizoribine (Group 1, n=78) and those transplanted under tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (Group 2, n=89). Overall patient survival at 5 and 10 years was 93.8% and 88.0%, respectively. Overall graft survival at 5 and 10 years was 76.9% and 55.9%, respectively. Graft survival in the patients with anti-A/B IgG titers over 1:128 was significantly lower in group 1, whereas no significant correlation between the anti-A/B IgG titers and graft survival was found in group 2. In conclusion, no correlation between anti-A/B antibody titers and the results of ABO-incompatible LKT was seen after tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil application.     

Safety of Blood Group A2-to-O Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible organ transplantation typically induces hyperacute rejection. A2-to-O liver transplantations have been successful. This study compared overall and graft survival in O recipients of A2 and O grafts based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were used. The first A2-to-O liver transplantation was entered on March 11, 1990; all previous transplantations were excluded. Between March 11, 1990, and September 3, 2010, 43,335 O recipients underwent transplanation, of whom 358 received A2 grafts. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, and race between the groups. Recipients of A2 grafts versus O grafts were significantly more likely to be hospitalized at transplantation (45% vs. 38%, P≤0.05) and to have a higher mean (SD) model for end-stage liver disease score (24 [11] vs. 22 [10], P≤0.05). 10% of A2 recipients and 9% of O recipients underwent retransplantation. No significant differences existed in rejection during the transplantation admission and at 12 months: 7% versus 6% and 20% versus 22% for A2 recipients and O recipients, respectively; and there were no significant differences in contributing factors to graft failure or cause of death. At 5 years, overall survival of A2 and O graft recipients was 77% and 74%, respectively (log rank=0.71). At 5 years, graft survival was 66% in both groups (log rank=0.52). Donor blood group was insignificant on Cox regression for overall and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we present the largest series of A2-to-O liver transplantations and conclude this mismatch option to be safe with similar overall and graft survival. This opens possibilities to further meet the demands of a shrinking organ supply, especially with regard to expanding living-donor options.     

Rejection episodes and 3-year graft survival under sirolimus and tacrolimus treatment after adult intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been recently introduced in clinical practice after intestinal transplantation. We focused on Sirolimus (Rapamycin) to examine effects on rejection and graft survival following intestinal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty isolated intestinal recipients and 5 multivisceral patients (2 with liver) in our series were divided into 3 groups: patients started on Sirolimus (because of nephrotoxicity or biopsy-proven rejection), who continued therapy longer than 3 months (n = 11); patients started on Sirolimus (because of nephrotoxicity or biopsy-proven rejection), who received therapy less than 3 months because of side effects (n = 4); and a control group, who never received rapamycin (n = 10). RESULTS: During prolonged treatment combined with Tacrolimus (Prograf), both Sirolimus groups showed a decreased number of acute cellular rejections (P < .01). Cumulative 3-year graft and patient survival rates were 81% in the Sirolimus greater than 3 months group, 100% in the Sirolimus less than 3 months group, and 80% and 90% in the control group, respectively (P = .63 and P = .62). CONCLUSION: In our experience, the use of mTOR-inhibitors in combination with calcineurin-inhibitors seemed to be more effective than monotherapy to reduce the number of rejections. Side effects can limit its use as maintenance therapy.     

One year results of preoperative single bolus ATG-Fresenius induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients

Sensitization in kidney transplantation is associated with more acute rejections, inferior graft survival, and an increase in delayed graft function. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative single bolus antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifty-six cadaveric donor kidney transplant recipients were divided into two groups: Group I (nonsensitized group, n = 30) and group II (sensitized group, PRA>10%, n = 26). ATG was given as a single preoperative bolus induction therapy to group II (ATG IV; 9 mg/kg). The group I patients were treated with mycophenolate mofetil preoperatively as induction therapy. The basic immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus (FK-506) or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. After hospital discharge, patients were followed on a routine outpatient basis for 12 months. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) occurred in 20% (6/30) of group I and 15.38% (4/26) of group II patients (P = NS). Infections occurred in eight patients (26.7%) as 11 episodes (36.7%), averaging 1.4 episodes per infected patient in group 1, and 6 patients (23.1%) for a total of 10 episodes (38.5%), averaging 1.7 episodes per infected patient, in group II (P = NS). Occurrence of side effects and hospital stay were almost comparable in the two groups. No delayed graft function was observed in either group. The 12-month actuarial patient and graft survival were 100% in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: A preoperative single bolus ATG induction therapy was an effective and safe therapeutic measure, yielding an acceptable acute rejection rate in presensitized renal transplant recipients.     

Improving access to kidney transplantation without decreasing graft survival: long-term outcomes of blood group A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys in B recipients

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of blood group A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys into B recipients could improve access to transplantation for blood group B recipients. However, this practice is controversial, and long-term data are lacking. This study analyzed the long-term outcomes of A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys transplanted into selected B recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the outcomes (graft survival, transplant rates, and acute rejection) of deceased-donor kidneys using an allocation system that transplanted A2/A2B donors into B recipients with low anti-A blood group antibody titers between 1994 and 2003. Patients received conventional immunosuppression without any specific antibody reduction procedures. We further assessed the impact this system had on access to transplantation by blood group. RESULTS: Of 1,400 kidney transplants, 56 (4.0%) were A2/A2B to B recipients. The system reduced waiting time for all B recipients, even shorter than for blood group A recipients (median waiting times of A2/A2B to B transplants=182 days vs. B to B transplants=297 days; and A to A=307 days). Although there was a trend toward increased acute rejection in A2/A2B to B transplants, the actuarial 7-year death censored graft survival was 72% for B recipients regardless of donor type. CONCLUSIONS: Transplanting A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys into B recipients leads to an equalization of waiting time between blood groups with similar patient and graft survival using conventional immunosuppression. This protocol could lead to more equal access to kidney transplantation in blood group B recipients.     

HLA-identical sibling renal transplantation--a 21-yr single-center experience

Human lymphocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling organs offer the best long-term outcomes for recipients of a renal transplant apart from an identical twin. Unlike cadaveric transplants, however, factors that affect long-term survival of these immunologically privileged grafts are not well described. We reviewed 108 HLA-identical transplants performed at our institution between January 1977 and February 1993. Variables chosen for graft survival analysis were: gender, age and ABO blood type of donors and recipients, panel reactivity antibodies (PRA), blood transfusions prior to transplant, pregnancies, and the underlying renal disease. Additionally, incidence of acute rejection (AR), timing of AR, serum creatinine levels at 1 wk and at 1 yr, and presence of hypertension were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 130.9 +/- 58.2 months (range 38-250 months). Actual 5-yr patient and graft survivals were 92 and 88%, respectively. Thirty-eight grafts were lost, and 22 recipients died during the observation period. Death was the main cause of graft failure. Cardiac events accounted for the majority of deaths. AR occurred in 46% and repeated rejections in 11% of recipients. Actuarial graft survival at 10 yr was poorer for patients with any AR (69%), and significantly worse with repeated AR (33%), compared to patients without AR (86%), p = 0.001). Sixty percent of all rejections and 88% of the first rejections occurred in the first 60 d post-transplantation. The first AR that occurred after 60 d was associated with poor graft survival (49 vs. 70%, p = 0.04). Recipients with renal diseases with potential to recur (membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), focal and segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGN), polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), rapid progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), Henoch-Schoenlein purpura (HSP), diabetes mellitus (DM), interstitial nephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN)) faired worse as a group than recipients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis (HTN), autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Alport's, reflux or congenital dysplasia (68 vs. 96% at 10 yr, p = 0.0009). Poor patient survival was seen in diabetics (71 vs. 88% at 10 yr, p = 0.01). There was a trend to poorer graft survival in diabetic recipients when compared to non-diabetics (65 vs. 81% at 10 yr, p = 0.054). Elevated creatinine at 1 yr was associated with worse graft survival. Likewise, the magnitude of creatinine increase during the first year directly correlated with the risk of graft loss. Hypertensive patients were more likely to lose their grafts than normotensive recipients (72 vs. 86%, p = 0.04). Pre-transplant blood transfusion, pregnancy, and PRA level were not associated with increased graft failure or AR. Graft survival was not affected by gender, age, or ABO blood type of donors or recipients. In conclusion, better prevention and treatment of AR, hypertension, and cardiac disease should improve graft and patient survival. Close attention to recurrence of disease and subtle changes in the creatinine level during the first year might dictate early diagnostic and, hopefully, therapeutic interventions.     

The use of an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody and mycophenolate mofetil enables the use of a low-dose tacrolimus and early withdrawal of steroids in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reducing calcineurin-inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity and simultaneously avoiding long-term steroid related side-effects is a desirable goal in renal transplantation. We examined the hypothesis that using anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would allow the lowering of target pre-dose blood concentrations of tacrolimus immediately after transplantation and subsequently stopping steroids at 5 months. METHODS: Eighty-two kidney recipients were enrolled in a single-center study comparing two tacrolimus-based protocols. Group I (n = 41) patients received a standard-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 10-15 ng/mL) with MMF and a standard dose corticosteroid. Group II (n = 41) patients were treated with a low-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 5-10 ng/mL) and MMF, a low-dose corticosteroid (stopped after 5 months) and induction with daclizumab. RESULTS: Patient (95.1 versus 100%) and graft survival (92.6 versus 97.5%) at 1 yr were not different between groups. Patients of group II experienced significantly less acute rejections than group I (17.1 versus 41.4% p = 0.03). Delayed graft function occurred less often in group II (5 versus 12% p = 0.43). Graft function at 1 yr was significantly better in group II (serum creatinine 1.49 versus 1.69 mg/dL and creatinine clearance 59.6 versus 49 mL/min; p < 0.05). Corticosteroids could be stopped after 5 months in 82.9% of group II patients. CONCLUSION: A regimen consisting of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and MMF allows the safe and efficient use of low-target pre-dose trough concentrations of tacrolimus and enables the early discontinuation of steroids. Preliminary results indicate a better 1-yr graft function compared to a normal-dose tacrolimus regimen.     

Renal transplantation across the ABO barrier using A2 kidneys.

BACKGROUND: The waiting list for cadaveric kidney transplantation has continued to grow, and with the relative scarcity of cadaver donors, the median waiting time for patients in the United States increased to 824 days in 1994. The median waiting times for patients with blood groups B or O were 1329 and 1007 days, respectively. Allocation of blood group A2 kidneys (20% of group A) to blood group O and B patients expands their potential donor pool and shortens their waiting time for a kidney transplantation. METHODS: Between May 1991 and June 1998, we transplanted 15 A2 kidneys into 6 blood group O and 9 blood group B patients. Anti-A isoagglutinins were measured before transplantation, and patients with anti-A1 titers > or = 1:8 underwent plasmapheresis (PP). RESULTS: One patient with high titer anti-A antibodies, who did not receive PP, lost her allograft because of hyperacute rejection. Allograft function was excellent in the remaining 14 patients, with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.7 (+/-0.89) mg/dl at 1 month and 1.3 (+/-0.34) mg/dl at 1 year. The actuarial 1-year graft survival rate was 93.3+/-6.4% and the patient survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the allocation of blood group A2 kidneys for blood group O and B recipients is a practical way to expand the donor pool for these transplant candidates. PP may be important for reducing the levels of anti-A1 and anti-A2 antibodies and for reducing the risk of hyperacute rejection. Splenectomy seems to be unnecessary.     

ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation in children

BACKGROUND: Due to a severe shortage of suitable cadaveric allografts for children awaiting kidney transplants, we have performed a series of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantations (LKT) at our institution. METHODS: Between July 1989 and March 2000, 16 pediatric patients (3 female, 13 male) underwent ABO-incompatible LKT. The mean age at transplantation was 10.9+/-4.3 years (range 5.1-15.0 years). The donor to recipient ABO blood antigen incompatibility was as follows: A1-->O, 5 patients; B-->O, 6 patients; A1B-->B, 2 patients; and A1B -->B, A1-->B, or B-->A1, 1 patient each. The median pretransplantation anti-A1 titers of eight A-incompatible recipients were 1:128 (IgM, range 1:16 to 1:512) and 1:32 (IgG, range 1:2 to 1:128). Median anti-B titers of seven B-incompatible recipients were 1:32 (IgM, range 1:4 to 1:128) and 1:8 (IgG, range 1:2 to 1:64). All patients received three or four sessions of plasmapheresis (PP) and/or immunoadsorption (IA) to remove the anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies before transplantation. Immunosuppression initially consisted of cyclosporine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and antilymphocyte globulin. Splenectomy was performed on all recipients at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The patients were followed for 6 to 122 months with a mean follow-up of 63 months. All 16 recipients who underwent ABO-incompatible LKT achieved a pretransplant isoagglutinin titer less than 1:8 with 3-4 sessions of PP/IA treatment. Of 16 patients, 10 patients had rebound increase in their IgM and/or IgG anti-A/B titers to greater than 1:64 or predepletion levels within 10 days posttransplantation. In addition, nine patients developed renal dysfunction in association with the rebound increase in their anti-A/B. One patient lost his graft because of uncontrolled delayed hyperacute rejection, whereas eight other recipients recovered completely with pulse steroids and PP/IA therapy. After the third week posttransplant, there was no correlation between the occurrence of AR and their isoagglutinin titers. Moreover, no antibody-mediated rejection was observed, even in recipients with continued high titer anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies. Patient survival is 100% to date. The actuarial 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates are 87% and 85%, respectively. No fatal infectious complications occurred despite the combination of splenectomy and immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that with adequate pre- and posttransplant management, successful kidney transplantation across the ABO barrier is possible in the pediatric population. "Accommodation" of the allografts occurred within 2 weeks of transplantation. Subsequently, the long-term graft outcome of ABO-incompatible LKT was comparable to that of ABO-compatible LKT.     

Thymoglobulin induction decreases rejection in solitary pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Solitary pancreas transplants, both pancreas transplant alone (PTA) and pancreas after kidney (PAK), have higher rejection rates and lower graft survivals than simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK). The aim of this study is to compare three different antibody induction regimens in solitary pancreas transplant recipients and to assess the role of surveillance pancreas biopsies in the management of these patients. METHODS: Solitary pancreas transplant recipients between 01/98 to 02/00 (n=29) received induction with either daclizumab (1 mg/kg on day 0, 7, 14), OKT 3 (5 mg/day x0-7), or thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/day x0-10). Maintenance immunosuppression was similar for the three groups. All rejections were biopsy-proven either by surveillance/protocol or when clinically indicated. RESULTS: The 1-year graft survival was 89.3% overall and 91.7% in the thymoglobulin group. Thymoglobulin significantly decreased rejection in the first 6 months when compared with OKT3 or daclizumab (7.7 vs. 60 vs. 50%). Acute rejections were seen on surveillance biopsies in the absence of biochemical abnormalities in 40% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoglobulin induction regimen led to a low incidence of acute rejection and a high rate of graft survival in solitary pancreas transplants. In addition, surveillance biopsies were useful in the detection of early acute rejection in the absence of biochemical abnormalities.     

Role of anti-A/B antibody titers in results of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies showed that the incidence of humoral rejection was extremely high in ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. This result suggests that anti-A/B antibody titers directly influence the graft survival of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. In this study, we examined the impact of preoperative anti-A/B antibody titers on the results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients underwent ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation at our institution between January 1989 and December 1995. The mean age was 34.9 years with 38 males and 29 females. Sixty-one of the 67 recipients were included in an analysis of the impact of anti-A/B antibody titer in long-term graft survival. The remaining six patients were excluded because of death with a functioning graft (three patients) and withdrawal of immunosuppression due to nonimmunological reasons (three patients) within 1 year after renal transplantation. RESULTS: The graft survival rate for the level of less than 1:16 in maximum IgG antibody before transplantation (n=21) at 1, 5, and 8 years was 81.0, 66.8, and 66.8%, respectively. The corresponding values for the level of 1:32-1:64 (n=33) and higher than 1:128 (n=7) were 93.9, 90.5, and 79.7%, and 42.9, 28.6, and 28.6%, respectively (log-rank test, P=0.0007). There was no significant association between maximum anti-A/B IgM titers, minimum anti-A/B IgM titers, minimum anti-A/B IgG titers, and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative maximum anti-A/B IgG titers correlated with the long-term graft survival in ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. Thus, preoperative maximum levels of anti-A/B IgG titers are one of the good predictors of the results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation.     

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation with no immunological graft losses using total plasma exchange,splenectomy, and quadruple immunosuppression: Evidence for accommodation

ABO-incompatible liver transplants (LTX) have been associated with a high risk of antibody-mediated rejection, poor patient and graft survival, and a high risk of vascular thrombosis and ischemic bile duct complications. We used pretransplantation and posttransplantation double-volume total plasma exchange (TPE), splenectomy, and quadruple immunosuppression (cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, cyclosporine or tacrolimus, and OKT3 induction) in 14 patients receiving ABO-incompatible LTX between June 1992 and February 2001: A₁ to O (seven), B to O (two), B to A (two), A to B (one), AB to A (one), and AB to O (one). Actuarial 1- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates are 71.4% and 61.2 % and 71.4% and 61.2%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 62.9 ± 39.4 months. Ten acute cellular rejections occurred, and the mean time to the first episode was 62 ± 33 days. All were steroid sensitive. No antibody-mediated rejection or vascular thromboses occurred. Pretransplantation pre-TPE immunoglobulin (Ig) G mean isohemagglutinin titers were 262 ± 326, compared with pretransplantation post-TPE titers of 65 ± 103 (P = .04). Eight of nine patients with measurable titers before and after TPE achieved a reduction in titers. The mean number of posttransplantation TPE was 5.5 ± 4.1 (range, 0 to 12), and the last TPE was on postoperative day 9.4 ± 5.3. IgG isohemagglutinin titers 2 weeks posttransplantation had increased to 153 ± 309 (P = .03 compared with pretransplantation pre-TPE IgG). ABO-incompatible liver transplantations can be performed with acceptable patient and graft survival rates with a low risk of antibody-mediated rejection with a combination of TPE, splenectomy, and quadruple immunosuppression. Recovery of isohemagglutinin antibody levels without humoral rejection suggests that accommodation may be the protective mechanism preventing late antibody-mediated rejection. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:22-30.)     

Hyperacute rejection in porcine liver transplantation. I. Clinical characteristics, histopathology, and disappearance of donor-specific lymphocytotoxic antibody from serum

Hyperacute rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation remains an extremely unusual occurrence. In this study, we examined a porcine model of liver transplantation in which recipient animals were sensitized prior to transplantation with three serial full-thickness skin grafts. Three experimental groups were studied. Group I recipients (n = 6) were specifically sensitized against their liver donors with biweekly skin grafts followed by hepatic grafting. Group II recipients (n = 6) underwent third-party skin graft sensitization prior to liver transplantation. Group III recipients (n = 6) underwent liver grafting without sensitization. Mixed lymphocyte cultures were done before each skin graft and prior to transplantation. Lymphocytotoxic antibody (LCTA) titers were measured before the first skin graft, at weekly intervals thereafter, intraoperatively, and daily postoperatively until death. Intraoperative and postmortem liver biopsies were obtained in all recipients. Five of six recipients in Group I died within 4 hr of hepatic revascularization. The remaining animal survived for four days. Mean survival time in group I was 0 +/- 0.7 days. In contrast, MST in groups II and III were 4.0 +/- 1.2 and 6.2 +/- 1.3 days, respectively. The MST in group I was significantly shorter than in groups II and III (P less than 0.026 and P less than 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference in survival between groups II and III. MLC reactivity between recipients and skin donors increased progressively following each skin graft, reaching a peak just prior to liver transplantation. LCTA titers also increased following each skin graft, reaching peak levels immediately prior to hepatic grafting. Intraoperative LCTA titers decreased within 2 min of graft revascularization and were undetectable within 4 hr. In group III (unsensitized recipients), MLC reactivity was low and at no time was LCTA detectable. Histologic examination of the livers from group I recipients showed parenchymal hemorrhage, endophlebitis, and neutrophil infiltration. Histologic examination of postmortem liver biopsies from animals in groups II and III revealed acute cellular rejection. In conclusion, hyperacute rejection resulting in graft failure and recipient death can be consistently produced in a porcine model of hepatic transplantation by donor-specific sensitization of the recipient. It is postulated that high titers of donor-specific antibody are required to exceed the liver's capacity for antibody absorption and elimination and produce the clinical picture of hyperacute rejection.     

低龄婴儿双供肾移植给成人22例报道

目的总结单中心低龄婴儿双供肾移植给成人的临床效果。方法回顾性纳入2013年7月至2017年10月华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院实施的所有儿童双供肾移植给成人受者共22例临床资料和随访数据。22例供者年龄(2.9±1.7)个月,体重(4.9±1.4)kg,其中15例小于3月龄。受者多为低体重女性成人,体重(46.3±5.6)kg。总结早期移植失败及随访期间移植肾失功或受者死亡原因。根据是否发生单侧移植肾血栓,移植肾功能恢复者又进一步分为双肾存活组和单肾存活组,比较移植肾中-长期功能。结果4例受者在术后早期出现移植失败,包括双肾血栓2例、移植肾破裂切除1例和受者多器官功能衰竭死亡1例。18例受者移植肾功能恢复出院,随访期间因移植肾新生肿瘤切除双肾1例、因复杂全身原因死亡1例、因间质性肺炎死亡1例,余15例受者双肾均存活者10例(中位随访59个月),单肾存活者5例(中位随访48个月)。移植1年时双肾存活组估算肾小球滤过率为(95±27)ml/(min·1.73 m2),显著高于单肾存活组(61±24)ml/(min·1.73 m2)(P<0.05),但3年时分别为(95±21)ml/(min·1.73 m2)和(69±31)ml/(min·1.73 m2),差异缩小,差异无显著统计学意义(P=0.12)。结论低龄婴儿双供肾移植虽然可以扩大供肾来源,但发生早期移植失败和单肾栓塞的风险较高。在单肾存活的情况下,受者仍具有相对满意的中-长期移植效果。     

Immunosuppression in renal transplantation: Long-term clinical trial of a double versus triple therapy regimen

Summary: Sixty-nine renal allograft recipients were randomized to two immunosuppressive regimens: 35 patients received cyclosporine A and prednisolone (PC) while 34 patients received low dose cyclosporine A, prednisolone and short term azathioprine (PCA). the data of 66 patients (34 in PC and 32 in PCA groups) were analysed. the median follow-up periods were 62 months for the PC group and 60 months for the PCA group. There was no difference in graft survival between the two groups but five patients died in the PC group compared to none in the PCA group (graft survival: 88 vs 90% at 1 year and 82 vs 82% at 5 years, P = not significant at any time point; patient survival: 90 vs 100% at 1 year and 88 vs 100% at 5 years, P = 0.05 at 5 years). There was a trend for patients in the PCA group to develop earlier and more frequent rejections (not significant; P = 0.106 and P = 0.062, respectively). There were also more episodes of acute cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the PC group. the mean serum creatinine at 5 years was significantly higher in the PCA group when compared to the PC group (179.8 ± 76.5 μmol/L vs 154.7 ± 41.0 μmol/L; P =0.05). We found that both therapeutic regimens were effective in preventing renal allograft rejections. However, double therapy was associated with higher patient mortality secondary to infection. Patients on triple therapy, on the other hand, were more prone to develop rejections in the early post-transplant period and were associated with less favourable renal function in the long run.     

Clinical trial of Tripterygium Wilfordii Hook F. in human kidney transplantation in China

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the effects of Triptergium Wilfordii Hook F.(T II) were assessed on human kidney allograft rejection and long-term survival. METHODS: This study compared treatment with T II(T II group, n=121) to that without T II(control group, n=102) among adult first cadaveric renal transplant recipients. The T II cohort of 121 recipients were divided into a regular dosage group (n=82) and a double dosage group (n=39). No antibody induction was administered to any patient. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven early acute allograft rejection occurred in 4.1% of patients in the T II group versus 24.5% of patients in the control group. No rejection or repeated rejections occurred in the double dosage group at 3 months after transplantation. Acute rejection episodes were milder in the T II than the control group. The incidence of CD25+ cells>10/ mm3 in the allografts at 3 months after transplantation was lower in the T II group than the control group, 15% and 50%, respectively. All patients tolerated T II well over the 5 years of this study. The 5-year graft survival censored for death with function was 96.7% in the T II group and 80.4% in the control group. CONCLUSION: T II was effective to prevent renal allograft rejection and increase long-term renal allograft survival among adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients.