Comparison of survival outcomes between Expanded Criteria Donor and Standard Criteria Donor kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

In 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing proposed increasing the pool of donor kidneys to include Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD). Outside the USA, the ECD definition remains the one used without questioning whether such a graft allocation criterion is valid worldwide. We performed a meta‐analysis to quantify the differences between ECD and Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) transplants. We paid particular attention to select studies in which the methodology was appropriate and we took into consideration the geographical area. Thirty‐two publications were included. Only five studies, all from the USA, reported confounder‐adjusted hazard ratios comparing the survival outcomes between ECD and SCD kidney transplant recipients. These five studies confirmed that ECD recipients seemed to have poorer prognosis. From 29 studies reporting appropriate survival curves, we estimated the 5‐year pooled nonadjusted survivals for ECD and SCD recipients. The relative differences between the two groups were lower in Europe than in North America, particularly for death‐censored graft failure. It is of primary importance to propose appropriate studies for external validation of the ECD criteria in non‐US kidney transplant recipients.     

Bisphosphonates for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

An estimated 60% of kidney transplant recipients have mineral bone disease and about 0.5% break their hip within the first year after transplantation. We conducted a systematic review of benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in kidney transplant recipients. We searched CENTRAL (Issue 5, 2015) for randomized controlled trials in all languages and screened the reference list of an earlier Cochrane review. One reviewer identified the trials, extracted all data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta‐analysis used a random effects model, with results expressed as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Bisphosphonates have uncertain effects on death (RR 0.45, CI 0.04–4.69) and vertebral fractures (RR 0.58, CI 0.24–1.43, I² 0%). Bisphosphonates moderately to importantly reduce the loss of vertebral bone mineral density (MD 5.98%, CI 3.77–8.18% change from baseline in g calcium/cm² at 12 months, I² 91%) and femoral bone mineral density (MD 5.57%, 3.12–8.01% change from baseline in g calcium/cm² at 12 months, I² 69%). At this stage, insufficient evidence exists to support routine use of bisphosphonates to reduce fracture risk after kidney transplantation. Data on important health outcomes are lacking, surrogate outcomes poorly reflect bone quality in kidney transplant recipients, and serious adverse events are not studied and reported systematically.     

Clinical outcomes of polyvalent immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Polyvalent immunoglobulin is commonly used for desensitization and treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection in kidney transplantation but its impact on other outcomes is not known. This systematic review investigated the impact of immunoglobulin prophylaxis on infection, rejection, graft loss, and death following kidney transplantation. A comprehensive literature search located 18 studies (n = 8 randomized controlled trials). None examined the effect of immunoglobulin prophylaxis in transplant recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia. Quality of included studies was variable with high to very high risk of bias. In the randomized trials, immunoglobulin use did not reduce cytomegalovirus infection (OR 0.68 [0.39, 1.21]; 6 studies, n = 295), rejection (OR 0.96 [0.50, 1.82]; 4 studies, n = 187), or graft loss (OR 1.03 [0.46, 2.30]; 6 studies, n = 265). In non‐randomized studies, immunoglobulin did not reduce cytomegalovirus infection (OR 0.63 [0.20, 1.94]; 6 studies, n = 361) or death (OR 1.32 [0.05, 38.79]; 3 studies, n = 222) but reduce rejection (OR 0.47 [0.24, 0.94]; 4 studies, n = 268) and graft loss (OR 0.15 [0.05, 0.43]; 2 studies, n = 118). Data were scarce and sample size of current evidence was small. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to determine if immunoglobulin is an effective intervention to reduce infection, rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation with and without hypogammaglobulinemia.     

Effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in liver transplant patients: a meta‐analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Bone mineral density (BMD) loss after liver transplantation (LT) results in considerable morbidity with the increased risk of fractures. Data on the efficacy of bisphosphonate use in post LT patients is scarce. This meta‐analysis aims to summarize the results from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the topic of interest. Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant publications. A total of 157 articles were identified and reviewed. Individual authors were contacted from relevant RCTs to obtain individual patient data where necessary to uniformly quantify BMD values post LT pre‐ and post LT. A total of six RCTs were used for final data extraction. (i) Lumbar Spine: In 364 patients (six studies, 182 in intervention and control groups each), bisphosphonate therapy improved BMD by 0.03 g/cm² (95% C.I. 0.01–0.05 g/cm²; P = 0.02) at 12 months post LT. (ii) Femoral neck: In 268 patients (four studies, 130 bisphosphonate, 138 control), bisphosphonate use did not result in a statistically significant change in BMD at the end of 1 year. None of the studies noted serious adverse effects related to bisphosphonate administration. Data on incident fractures could not be pooled because of heterogeneity. Bisphosphonate therapy during the first year in LT recipients appears to reduce accelerated bone loss and improve bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.     

Effects of metabolic syndrome on kidney transplantation outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Metabolic syndrome (MS) has been associated with proteinuria and reduced glomerular filtration rate. Immunosuppressive agents increase the incidence of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and have known effects on MS components after kidney transplantation. The purpose of this meta‐analysis was to evaluate the impact of MS on relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to November 7, 2015. Papers that compared patients with and without MS and assessed one of the following outcomes, graft loss, death by cardiovascular disease, and all‐cause mortality, were included. Of 585 studies identified, five studies including 1269 patients were evaluated. MS was identified as a risk factor for graft loss [relative risk, 3.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.17, 4.32; I² = 0%; P heterogeneity = 0.72] and death by CVD (relative risk, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.27, 9.85; I² = 0%; P heterogeneity = 0.40). Results on the association between MS and all‐cause mortality were inconclusive (relative risk, 2.61; 95% CI, 0.70, 9.81; I² = 58%; P heterogeneity = 0.09). Graft loss and death by CVD were associated with the presence of MS after transplantation. Randomized clinical trials should be conducted to define whether interventions on each MS component would result in better outcomes after transplantation.     

Bone loss after kidney transplantation: a longitudinal study in 115 graft recipients

BACKGROUND.: Bone loss is an important problem in renal transplant recipientsimmediately after surgery. No data are available about the boneloss beyond the first post-transplantation year. METHODS.: In a longitudinal, uncontrolled observational study bone mineraldensity (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry in 115renal graft recipients starting at different times after transplantation(0–20 years after transplantation) with a follow-up timeof 12 months. RESULTS.: A total of 56 patients showed a reduction of BMD during theobservation period. Bone loss depended on the time after transplantation.Mean reduction of BMD at lumbar spine was 7±10%, 1±9%during the first and second postoperative year. Beyond the thirdyear bone mineral density did not change or even increased slightly(0±4% during 3–5th year, 1±6% during 6–10thyear and 2±4% during 11–20th year after transplantation).Decrease of BMD correlated with a higher mean daily prednisonedosage (P<0.001), a higher cumulative prednisone dose (P<0.01),a more frequent and more steroid-resistant rejection (P<0.001)and a higher initial parathyroid hormone level (P<0.001).Patients with 25-OH-cholecalciferol therapy (P<0.05) or morephysical activity (P<0.05) had a smaller bone loss. CONCLUSIONS.: Reduction of BMD after transplantation is highest within thefirst post-transplant year. The effects of acute graft rejection,prednisone dosage and initial parathyroid hormone level arepredominant among the multiple factors associated with pronouncedbone loss.     

The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto-iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto-iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for meta-analysis were patient survival, (death-censored) graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Twenty-one studies were identified, eight provided data for meta-analysis. KTR with VC had a significantly increased mortality risk [1-year: risk ratio (RR) 2.19 (1.39–3.44), 5-year: RR 2.28 (1.86–2.79)]. The risk of 1-year graft loss was three times higher in recipients with VC [RR 3.15 (1.30–7.64)]. The risk of graft loss censored for death [1-year: RR 2.26 (0.58–2.73), 3-year: RR 2.19 (0.49–9.82)] and the risk of DGF (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.58) were not statistically different. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low. To conclude, the presence of VC was associated with an increased mortality risk and risk of graft loss. In this small sample size, no statistical significant association between VC and DGF or risk of death-censored graft loss could be demonstrated. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration.     

Clinical outcomes of polyvalent immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis – Part II: Non‐kidney transplant

Immunoglobulin (IG) is commonly used to desensitize and treat antibody‐mediated rejection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The impact of IG on other outcomes such as infection, all‐cause mortality, graft rejection, and graft loss is not clear. We conducted a similar systematic review and meta‐analysis to our previously reported Part I excluding kidney transplant. A comprehensive literature review found 16 studies involving the following organ types: heart (6), lung (4), liver (4), and multiple organs (2). Meta‐analysis could only be performed on mortality outcome in heart and lung studies due to inadequate data on other outcomes. There was a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.34 [0.17‐0.69]; 4 studies, n = 455) in heart transplant with hypogammaglobulinemia receiving IVIG vs no IVIG. Mortality in lung transplant recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia receiving IVIG was comparable to those of no hypogammaglobulinemia (OR 1.05 [0.49, 2.26]; 2 studies, n = 887). In summary, IVIG targeted prophylaxis may decrease mortality in heart transplant recipients as compared to those with hypogammaglobulinemia not receiving IVIG, or improve mortality to the equivalent level with those without hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients, but there is a lack of data to support physicians in making decisions around using immunoglobulins in all SOT recipients for infection prophylaxis.     

Long‐term outcome of belatacept therapy in de novo kidney transplant recipients – a case‐match analysis

While belatacept has shown favorable short‐ and midterm results in kidney transplant recipients, only projections exist regarding its potential impact on long‐term outcome. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case‐match analysis of the 14 belatacept patients originally enrolled in the phase II multicenter trial at our center. Fifty six cyclosporine (CyA)‐treated patients were matched according to age at transplantation, first/retransplant, and donor type. Ten years after kidney transplantation, kidney function remained superior in belatacept‐treated patients compared with the CyA control group. Moreover, none of the belatacept‐treated patients had donor‐specific antibodies ≥10 years post‐transplantation compared with 38.5% of tested CyA‐treated subject (0/10 vs. 5/13; P = 0.045). Notably, however, patient and graft survival was virtually identical in both groups (71.4% vs. 71.3%; P = 0.976). In the present single‐center study population, patients treated with belatacept demonstrated a patient and graft survival at 10 years post‐transplant which was comparable to that of similarly selected CNI‐treated patients. Larger studies with sufficient statistical power are necessary to definitively determine long‐term graft survival with belatacept.     

Cinacalcet versus standard treatment for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD) have been associated with poor health outcomes, including diminished quality and length of life. Standard management for CKD-MBD includes phosphate restricted diet, vitamin D and phosphate binders. Persistently elevated parathyroid hormone levels may require the addition of cinacalcet hydrochloride (cinacalcet), which sensitizes calcium receptors in the parathyroid gland.

Purpose: The objective of this systematic review is to compare, in patients with CKD-MBD the effect of cinacalcet versus standard treatment on patient-important outcomes, including parathyroidectomy, fractures, hospitalizations due to cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and intermediate outcomes, in particular Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative targets.

Methods: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from 1996 to June 2015. Teams of two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened titles and abstracts and potentially eligible full text reports to determine eligibility, and subsequently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias in eligible trials. We calculated the effect estimates (risk ratios or mean differences) and 95% confidence intervals, as well as statistical measures of variability in results across studies using random effect models. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to rate quality of evidence about estimates of effect on an outcome-by-outcome basis for all outcomes. We presented our results with a GRADE summary table.

Results: Twenty-four trials including 8311 CKD patients proved eligible. The results left considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of cinacalcet on reducing fractures (relative risk [RR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–2.60; heterogeneity: p?=?0.03, I²=?78%; very low quality evidence), and indicated that cinacalcet did not reduce hospitalizations due to cardiovascular events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85–1.02, moderate quality of evidence), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.07; heterogeneity p=?0.61, high quality evidence) or all-cause mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89–1.04; heterogeneity: p=?0.98, I²=?0%; moderate quality evidence). Cinacalcet reduced the need for parathyroidectomy (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.22–0.42; heterogeneity: p=?0.70, I²=?0%; absolute effect 55 fewer per 1000 [95% CI 61 fewer to 45 fewer], high quality of evidence). The most common adverse event associated with cinacalcet therapy was gastrointestinal side effects. Cinacalcet increased nausea (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.46–3.21, absolute effect 158 more per 1000 [95% CI 82 more to 302 more]) and vomiting (RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.66–2.80, absolute effect 63 more per 1000 [95% CI 109 more to 171 more]). Cinacalcet treatment increased the rate of hypocalcemia (RR 6.0, 95% CI 3.65–9.87; heterogeneity: p=?0.71, I²=?0%, absolute effect 20 more per 1000 [95% CI 11 more to 36 more], high quality of evidence).

Conclusions: In the hands of clinicians participating in these studies, cinacalcet decreased the rate of parathyroidectomy but had no influence on mortality. Patients and clinicians can trade of the benefit of fewer parathyroidectomies against the adverse effects.     

Outcomes at 7 years post‐transplant in black vs nonblack kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept or cyclosporine in BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

Clinical outcomes are generally worse for black vs nonblack renal allograft recipients. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, recipients were randomized to belatacept more intense‐based, belatacept less intense‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. At year 7, belatacept was associated with superior graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT (recipients of living or standard criteria deceased donor kidneys); belatacept was associated with similar graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT‐EXT (recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys). In both studies, renal function was superior for belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients. Seven‐year outcomes were examined by race post hoc in each study. The effect of race and treatment on time to death or graft loss was compared using Cox regression. The interaction between treatment and race was also considered. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated from months 1 to 84 using a repeated‐measures model. In total, 8.3% (55/666) and 13.1% (71/543) of patients in BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, respectively, were black. Time to death or graft loss was similar in blacks and nonblacks. For both subgroups, estimated mean GFR increased over 7 years for belatacept, but declined for cyclosporine. Outcomes were similar in belatacept‐treated black and nonblack patients. Due to the small number of black patients, these results must be interpreted with caution.     

Inverse association of serum long-acting natriuretic peptide and bone mineral density in renal transplant recipients

Hsu B‐G, Ho G‐J, Lee C‐J, Yang Y‐C, Chen Y‐C, Shih M‐H, Lee M‐C. Inverse association of serum long‐acting natriuretic peptide and bone mineral density in renal transplant recipients.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01575.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fasting serum long‐acting natriuretic peptide (LANP) concentration in renal transplant recipients. Patients and methods: Fasting blood samples were obtained from 65 renal transplant recipients. BMD was measured using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry in lumbar vertebrae (L2–L4). Serum LANP levels were measured using a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit. Results: Six patients (9.2%) had osteoporosis and 28 patients (43.1%) had osteopenia in renal transplant recipients. Increased serum LANP (p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with low lumbar T‐score cut‐off points between groups (normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) in renal transplant recipients. Female patients had lower lumbar BMD than male renal transplant recipients (p = 0.027). Univariate linear regression analysis indicated that lumbar BMD were positively correlated with height (p = 0.038), body weight (p = 0.003), and body mass index (BMI; p = 0.019), whereas negatively correlated with LANP (p = 0.004) among the renal transplant recipients. Multivariate forward stepwise linear regression analysis of the significant variables revealed that body weight (R² change = 0.132; p = 0.006) and LANP (R² change = 0.093; p = 0.008) were the independent predictors of lumbar BMD values in the renal transplant recipients. Conclusion: Serum LANP concentration correlates negatively with lumbar BMD values in renal transplant recipients.     

COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients

There is minimal information on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in immunocompromised individuals. We have studied 10 patients treated at 12 adult care hospitals. Ten kidney transplant recipients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) by polymerase chain reaction, and 9 were admitted. The median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 47‐67), 60% were male, 40% Caucasian, and 30% Black/African American. Median time from transplant to COVID‐19 testing was 2822 days (IQR 1272‐4592). The most common symptom was fever, followed by cough, myalgia, chills, and fatigue. The most common chest X‐ray and computed tomography abnormality was multifocal patchy opacities. Three patients had no abnormal findings. Leukopenia was seen in 20% of patients, and allograft function was stable in 50% of patients. Nine patients were on tacrolimus and a mycophenolic antimetabolite, and 70% were on prednisone. Hospitalized patients had their antimetabolite agent stopped. All hospitalized patients received hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Three patients died (30%), and 5 (50%) developed acute kidney injury. Kidney transplant recipients infected with COVID‐19 should be monitored closely in the setting of lowered immunosuppression. Most individuals required hospitalization and presenting symptoms were similar to those of nontransplant individuals.     

Outcomes of kidney retransplantation in recipients with prior post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is an uncommon but serious complication of solid organ transplantation. Reduction in immunosuppression is the mainstay of PTLD treatment, but it may precipitate graft loss. Retransplantation remains controversial, as immunosuppression resumption may trigger PTLD relapse. Herein, we describe the experience of eight patients who underwent kidney retransplantation after successful PTLD treatment. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) serology was not known before the first transplantation. PTLD was diagnosed 62.5 months (range 5–323 months) after transplantation and was confined to the renal allograft (n = 1), lymph nodes (n = 2), gastrointestinal tract (n = 4), or central nervous system (n = 1). Immunosuppression tapering (8/8), chemotherapy (6/8), oral cavity lymphoma excision (1/8), and allograft nephrectomy (1/8) led to hematological remission in all patients. Retransplantation was performed at a median of 55.5 months (range 29–95   months) after PTLD diagnosis. After a median follow‐up of 62.5 months (range 2–125 months) allograft survival was 87.5% (seven functioning grafts, one failed graft from chronic rejection), with no recurrence of PTLD. In all, five patients remain alive; the other three died from causes other than PTLD. In conclusion, kidney retransplantation appears to be safe in patients with prior PTLD and without major risk of hematological recurrence provided that PTLD has remitted.     

Unexpected low incidence of vertebral fractures in heart transplant recipients: analysis of bone turnover.

Heart transplantation (HTX) is associated with a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). Different markers of bone metabolism have been used, and the applied immunosuppressive regimens have also changed over time. This study was performed to re-investigate bone metabolism in HTX recipients. Twenty-five HTX recipients were compared with 25 HTX candidates in respect of biochemical parameters of bone metabolism, BMD, and the frequency of fractures for 1 year. Osteopenia or osteoporosis was observed in approximately two-thirds of the HTX recipients. Nevertheless, only three (12%) HTX recipients developed a vertebral fracture within 1 year after transplantation; no peripheral fractures occurred. Compared with HTX candidates, HTX recipients had lower serum levels of osteocalcin, and higher serum levels of cross-linked-N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX). In HTX recipients, osteocalcin initially reached a nadir, increased during the first 3 months, and decreased thereafter. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase initially increased and then decreased. Serum levels of NTX and parathyroid hormone remained high throughout the year. Despite a high bone turnover, an unexpectedly low rate of vertebral fractures was registered. Nevertheless, each fragility fracture is a serious complication and we need to take steps to prevent this complication.     

Ureterovesical anastomotic techniques for kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

No consensus exists about which ureterovesical anastomosis technique to use for kidney transplantation. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the existing techniques in relation to the risk of urological complications. All studies that compared ureterovesical anastomotic techniques in kidney transplantation were included. Study endpoints were urinary leakage, ureteral stricture, vesicoureteral reflux and hematuria. Subanalyses of stented and nonstented techniques were performed. Two randomized clinical trials and 24 observational studies were included. Meta‐analyses were performed on the Lich‐Gregoir (LG) versus Politano‐Leadbetter (PL) techniques and LG versus U‐stitch (U) techniques. Compared with the PL technique, the LG technique had a significantly lower prevalence of urinary leakage (risk ratio (RR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30 to 0.75) and a significantly lower prevalence of hematuria when compared with both PL and U techniques (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.49 and RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.50, respectively), regardless of ureteral stenting. There was no difference in the prevalence of ureteral strictures or vesicoureteral reflux between the various techniques. Of the three most frequently used ureterovesical anastomotic techniques, the LG technique results in fewer urological complications than the PL and U techniques.     

Delivery of transplant care among Hmong kidney transplant recipients: Outcomes from a single institution

Kidney transplantation entails well‐coordinated complex care delivery. Patient‐provider cultural and linguistic discordance can lead to healthcare disparities. We analyzed kidney transplantation outcomes among our institution's Hmong recipients using a retrospective cohort study. From 1995 to 2015, 2164 adult (age ≥18) recipients underwent kidney transplantation at our institution; 78 self‐identified as Hmong. Survival rates were analyzed and compared to Caucasian recipients (n = 2086). Fifty (64.1%) Hmong recipients consistently requested interpreters. Mean follow‐up was 9.8 years for both groups. Hmong recipients (N = 78) were on average younger at transplant (45.7 vs 49.7 years; P = 0.02), more likely to be female (56% vs 38%; P = 0.001), and had higher gravidity (5.0 vs 1.9 births; P < 0.001). There were 13 (16.7%) Hmong living donor recipients, who were younger (32.8 vs 42.9 years; P = 0.006) at transplant compared to Caucasians (1429, 68.5%). Hmong 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival was 100%; Caucasians, 97.1% and 88% (P < 0.001). Hmong 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival was 98.7% and 84.9%; Caucasians 94.8% and 80.9% (P = 0.013). One‐ and 5‐year rejection‐free survival showed no difference (88.9% vs 82.4%; 86.7% vs 83.4%, P = 0.996). Despite cultural and linguistic differences between Hmong recipients and providers, we found no evidence of inferiority in KT outcomes in the Hmong population.     

Hypertension in kidney transplant recipients

Arterial hypertension is frequently observed in renal transplant recipients. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial in most cases. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can increase peripheral vascular resistance by inducing arteriolar vasoconstriction and can cause extracellular fluid expansion by reducing the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), activating the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), and by inactivating the atrial natriuretic peptide. Glucocorticoids can impair urinary water and salt excretion. Poor graft function can lead to increased extracellular volume and inappropriate production of renin. Native kidneys, older age of the donor and transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) may also contribute to the development of hypertension. Arterial hypertension not only can increases the risk for cardiovascular events but can also deteriorate renal allograft function. A number of studies have shown that the higher the levels of blood pressure are, the higher is the risk of graft failure. On the other hand, a good control of blood pressure may prevent many cardiovascular and renal complications. Appropriate lifestyle modification is the first step for treating hypertension. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are the most frequently used antihypertensive agents, but in many cases, a combination of these and other drugs is required to obtain good control of hypertension.     

Review article: Managing bone complications after kidney transplantation

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) describes the laboratory, bone and vascular abnormalities that exist in patients with CKD stages 3–5D and that may persist after transplantation. Persisting abnormalities of bone turnover and abnormal mineralization, together with bone mineral density (BMD) loss from glucocorticoids, may all predispose to a loss of structural integrity and increased fracture risk in kidney and kidney pancreas recipients. Vitamin D, calcitriol, calcitonin and bisphosphonates have all been used to preserve BMD following transplantation, despite a lack of safety data and the potential for some of these drugs to cause harm. A limited number of post-transplant studies utilizing these drugs have not yet documented improved fracture prevention or fracture-related mortality and have not considered allocation based on risk factors for fracture or markers of bone turnover. Targeted allocation of the available therapies based on a stratification of risk appears warranted. This might be achieved using an algorithm incorporating BMD, X-ray evaluation, laboratory investigations including bone turnover markers and the assessment of standard fracture risk factors at the time of and soon after transplantation. This approach, which is similar to protocols used in the general population, may result in more effective management of patients and fewer adverse effects such as adynamic bone disease. Although BMD is a surrogate for fracture risk in the general population it is not validated in this transplant population. Consequently, such an approach should be confirmed by studies that include bone biopsy data and an evaluation of patient level outcomes.