Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dynamics during HCV treatment in HCV/HIV coinfection

We studied hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dynamics in 10 coinfected subjects in a trial of pegylated interferon-alpha2a (PEG-IFN) alone or combined with ribavirin (RBV), compared with IFN plus RBV for the treatment of HCV. Five subjects, 4 of whom were treated with PEG-IFN, achieved a sustained virological response, although it was delayed by >/=1 week in 3 subjects. The median treatment efficacy in blocking virion production was 99.7% in the PEG-IFN group and 60% with standard IFN. In 2 patients with detectable HIV loads before starting HCV study drugs, we observed a 1-log decrease in HIV RNA load. The estimated HCV virion half-life was longer in the HIV-coinfected subjects, which suggests that coinfection may contribute to a slower clearance of HCV. Although the early viral kinetics of coinfected subjects treated with PEG-IFN or IFN differ from those of singly infected subjects, the treatment response seems unaffected.     

Could anti-HCV treatment prevent recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients? Two case reports

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has proven long-term efficacy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin has become the standard of care in patients with both hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic hepatitis and HIV/HCV co-infection. Data on the safety and efficacy of combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is scarce and even more so in HIV/HCV co-infected subjects. We report the successful administration of both HAART and anti-HCV therapies in two HIV/HCV co-infected patients after HCC eradication. These encouraging results might argue for the feasibility of an aggressive approach in the management of co-infected patients with HCC.     

Treatment of hepatitis C in hemophiliacs

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hemophiliacs who received nonvirucidally treated large-pool clotting factor concentrates before 1986. In fact, although many hemophiliacs infected with HCV have a slow progression of liver disease, in a minority of them hepatitis evolves toward end-stage liver disease and hepatocarcinoma. Moreover, a significant percentage of HCV-infected hemophiliacs were also coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which can accelerate the progression of liver disease. Thus, the aim of anti-HCV therapy is to interrupt the chronic infection in order to prevent the progression of hepatitis to cirrhosis, liver decompensation, cancer and, ultimately, death. In this review we present the literature data on anti-HCV treatment in hemophiliacs. Combination therapy with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin has improved the poor results obtained with IFN monotherapy and has become the standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Given the positive results obtained with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in nonhemophiliacs, ongoing trials are evaluating this promising therapy in HCV-chronically infected hemophilic patients; preliminary results show a sustained response rate similar to that in patients without coagulopathy. Finally, based on the encouraging results in coinfected nonhemophiliacs, anti-HCV treatment should also be considered for those HIV-positive hemophiliacs in whom anti-retroviral treatment has stabilized the HIV infection.     

Role of weight-based ribavirin dosing and extended duration of therapy in chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PRESCO trial

The response to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) as treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is lower in HIV-coinfected than in HCV-monoinfected patients and could be due to suboptimal RBV dosing and/or insufficient duration of therapy in prior trials. In a prospective, multicenter, open, comparative trial, HCV/HIV-coinfected patients received pegIFN plus weight-based RBV for 48 or 72 weeks (HCV genotypes 1 and 4) and 24 or 48 weeks (HCV genotypes 2 and 3). Use of didanosine was not allowed. Out of 389 patients included in the trial, 61% were infected by HCV-1/4 and 67% had serum HCV-RNA >500,000 IU/ml. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved by 49.6%, significantly higher in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4 (72.4% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001). A high drop-out rate in the longer treatment arms precluded obtaining definitive conclusions about the efficacy of prolonging therapy. Premature treatment discontinuations due to serious adverse events occurred in 8.2%. Infection with HCV-2/3, lower baseline HCV-RNA, and negative HCV-RNA at week 12 were all independent predictors of SVR in the multivariate analysis. The use of RBV 1000-1200 mg/day plus pegIFN is relatively safe and provides SVR in nearly half of coinfected patients, twice as high in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients in the era of pegylated interferon and ribavirin

A significant percentage of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) -infected individuals are also infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). With the much-improved survival of HIV-infected patients through the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, liver disease caused by coinfection with HCV has emerged as a significant threat to the health and survival of persons with HIV disease. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with ongoing HIV viremia have a faster rate of HCV-related liver fibrosis progression and a more rapid progression to liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma than HCV-monoinfected persons. In contrast to the deleterious effect of HIV on HCV-related liver disease, most studies have shown that HCV does not influence progression of HIV infection to AIDS or death. HCV therapy with peginterferon alfa (2a or 2b) plus ribavirin can achieve a sustained viral response in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients of up to 38% in HCV genotype 1 and up to 73% in genotypes 2 and 3. The safety profile is largely similar to therapy in HIV-monoinfected patients, but there is a higher incidence of mitochondrial toxicity in patients taking didanosine or stavudine and of anemia in patients taking zidovudine. There is no proven anti-HCV therapy for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Liver transplantation is being investigated as a potential therapeutic option for HIV-infected individuals with ESLD, and initial reports are encouraging. Given that pegylated interferon and ribavirin have been shown to be safe and effective for HIV/HCV coinfection as well as HCV monoinfection, all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients should be evaluated for therapy.     

Epigenetic analysis of the IFNλ3 gene identifies a novel marker for response to therapy in HCV‐infected subjects

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is characterized by high interindividual variability in response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin. A genetic polymorphism on chromosome 19 (rs12979860) upstream of interferon‐λ3 (IFNλ3) is associated with a twofold change in sustained virologic response rate after 48 weeks of treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin in HCV genotype 1 (GT1) treatment‐naïve patients. We conducted epigenetic analysis on the IFNλ3 promoter to investigate whether DNA methylation is associated with response to HCV therapy. DNA samples from HCV GT1‐infected subjects receiving an interferon‐free paritaprevir‐containing combination regimen (N=540) and from HCV‐uninfected, healthy controls (N=124) were analysed for IFNλ3 methylation levels. Methylation was strongly associated with rs12979860 allele status whether adjusting for HCV status (r=65.0%, 95% CI: [60.2%, 69.5%]), or not (r=64.4%), both with P<2.2×10^?16. In HCV GT1‐infected subjects, C/C genotypes had significantly lower methylation levels relative to C/T or T/T genotypes (P<1×10^?14), with each T allele resulting in a nine‐unit increase in mean methylation level. Methylation levels did not correlate with response in subjects treated for 12 or 24 weeks. However, non‐C/C subjects with higher methylation levels were more likely to relapse when treatment duration was 8 weeks. This analysis suggests that methylation status of the IFNλ3 promoter region may be a useful parameter that identifies patients more likely to relapse following HCV therapy; however, continuing therapy for a sufficient duration can overcome this difference. These findings may provide mechanistic insight into the role of IFNλ3 genetic variants in HCV treatment response.     

Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND: Current therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV co-infected patients have a low success rate and are poorly tolerated. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) + ribavirin (RBV) versus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-INF) + RBV. METHODS: Randomized, single-centre, open-label clinical trial including patients with: detectable HCV-RNA, alanine aminotransferase > 1.5-fold upper limit of normal, abnormal liver histology, CD4 cell count > 250 x 10/l and HIV RNA < 10 000 copies/ml. Patients were assigned to INF (3 x 10 units three times/week) or PEG-IFN (100-150 microg/week) plus RBV (800-1200 mg/day). Duration of treatment was 48 weeks (only 24 weeks for HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and baseline HCV RNA < 800 000 IU/ml). The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were randomized (43 INF + RBV, 52 PEG-INF + RBV), 68% males, 82% injecting drug users; 63% genotypes 1 or 4 and 36% genotypes 2 or 3; 62% fibrosis index grade >/=2 and 30% bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis. SVR was significantly higher in the PEG-INF + RBV arm, 44% versus 21% (intent to treat; P = 0.017). Among patients with genotypes 1 or 4, SVR were 38% versus 7% (P = 0.007) and 53% versus 47% (P = 0.730) for genotypes 2 or 3. CD4 cell count but not its percentage dropped in both arms and HIV RNA viral load did not change from baseline. Side effects were very frequent in both arms leading to treatment discontinuation in 14 patients without statistical differences between arms (P = 0.565). CONCLUSION: PEG-INF + RBV was significantly more effective than INF + RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients, mainly of genotype 1 or 4.     

Current concepts in the management and treatment of hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very common among HIV-positive patients who were infected through intravenous drugs use or contaminated blood products (e.g., hemophiliacs). An increase in liver-related deaths among HIV-positive subjects co-infected with HCV has been acknowledged over the last years. HIV infection has a negative impact on the natural history of chronic hepatitis C, accelerating the progression of liver fibrosis. Moreover, interactions between anti-HIV and anti-HCV drugs are of concern, and a lower response to anti-HCV therapy limits its benefit in the HIV/HCV-coinfected population. Regarding treatment monitoring, the stopping rule at week 12 recommended for HCV-monoinfected individuals, seems to be equally valid in HIV-infected patients. This finding is of great value, since it allows to offer treatment in the absence of contraindication (e.g., low CD4 counts, alcohol abuse, etc), discontinuing it as soon as at 12 weeks after initiation when no chances of cure are anticipated, saving costs and deleterious side effects. There are important barriers to HCV treatment in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, which are necessary to be addressed in order to increase the eligibility and applicability of HCV therapy in this population. In addition, strategies aimed to improve tolerance of the HCV medication with adequate support as well as to enhance the response to current available therapies, including individualized tailoring of drug dosages and length of treatment, should be pursuit to enhance the rate of treatment success. Finally, new anti-HCV drugs currently under development are eagerly awaited for the growing number of HCV/HIV-coinfected patients non-responders or relapsers to the current therapy.     

Current therapy for hepatitis C or D or immunodeficiency virus concurrent infection with chronic hepatitis B

Concurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis delta virus (HDV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) appears to increase the risk of progressive liver disease including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There is a 10% prevalence of HCV infection in chronic HBV or HDV infection. Serological evidence of previous exposure to HBV is found in more than 80% of HIV-positive patients in the high risk group. Notably, the most recently acquired virus tends to suppress the pre-existing virus. In chronic HBV infection acquired perinatally or in early childhood, usually HCV is dominant and may suppress or even displace HBV and HDV. Less frequently, HBV or HDV suppresses HCV. It is generally agreed that the dominant virus should be identified in order to make appropriate treatment decisions. Studies with standard interferon (IFN) to treat patients with HCV dominantly dual HBV/HCV infection have showed only limited virological response. But high dose of IFN has been demonstrated with better response rate. Combined ribavirin with standard or pegylated IFN therapy could achieve a sustained HCV clearance rate comparable with those infected with HCV alone. On the contrary, patients with HBV dominantly dual viral infection might indicate more appropriate addition of lamivudine to IFN than ribavirin. Additionally, patients with concurrent infection of HBV and HDV, IFN seems to be the only effective agent. However, the efficacy of IFN is related to the dose. High dose of IFN [9 MU tiw (thrice per week)] and longer treatment duration (at least 2 years) have been shown to achieve adequate virological response. In patients with concurrently infected HBV and HIV, anti-HBV therapy should be considered for all patients with evidence of liver disease, irrespective of the CD4 cell count. In patients not requiring antiretroviral therapy, HBV therapy should be preferentially based on IFN, adefovir, or telbivudine. In contrast, in patients with CD4 cell counts <350 cells/μl or those already on antiretroviral therapy, agents with double anti-HBV and anti-HIV activity are preferred. At present, the evidence of therapeutic efficacy is not sufficient to make a recommendation in treating patients with dual HBV/HCV or HBV/HDV or HBV/HIV infection. Further studies of the well-designed, larger scale are needed to elucidate the role of different regimens or combination in the treatment of dual viral infection.     

HIV coinfection shortens the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus-related decompensated cirrhosis

The impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is unknown. Because HIV infection is no longer considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation in some countries, it has become a priority to address this topic. The objective of this study was to compare the survival of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HCV. In a retrospective cohort study, the survival of 1,037 HCV monoinfected and 180 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis after the first hepatic decompensation was analyzed. Of the group, 386 (37%) HCV-monoinfected and 100 (56%) HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects died during the follow-up. The median survival time of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients was 16 and 48 months, respectively (P < .001). The relative risk (95% CI) of death for HIV-infected patients was 2.26 (1.51-3.38). Other independent predictors of survival were age older than 63 years (2.25 [1.53-3.31]); Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B versus class A (1.95 [1.41-2.68]) and class C versus class A (2.78 [1.66-4.70]); hepatitis D virus infection (1.56 [1.12-4.77]); model for end-stage liver disease score, (1.05 [1.01-1-11]); more than one simultaneous decompensation (1.23 [1.12-3.33]); and the type of the first hepatic decompensation, with a poorer prognosis associated with encephalopathy compared with portal hypertensive gastrointestinal bleeding (2.03 [1.26-3.10]). In conclusion, HIV coinfection reduces considerably the survival of patients with HCV-related ESLD independently of other markers of poor prognosis. This fact must be taken into account to establish the adequate timing of liver transplantation in HIV-coinfected subjects.     

Advanced liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on antiretroviral therapy

HIV infection is believed to adversely affect the progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. However, information regarding HIV and HCV coinfection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is scarce. A cross-sectional study in 75 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients (most of them on HAART) and 75 HCV-monoinfected patients paired by age, sex, and date of liver biopsy analyzed the association of HIV infection with advanced liver fibrosis (Knodell fibrosis stages 3 + 4). The median CD4 cell count in HIV-coinfected patients was 546 cells/microl; 78.7% had an HIV-1 viral load <1000 copies/ml and 88% were on antiretroviral therapy. The percentage of patients harboring genotype 4 and with a higher HCV viral load was greater in the HIV-coinfected group. HCV/HIV-coinfected patients had more advanced liver fibrosis (Knodell fibrosis stages 3 + 4) than HCV-monoinfected patients (46.7% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001). In the univariate analysis, the factors associated with advanced liver disease were male sex (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.05-7.1), history of injecting drug use (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 2.0-10.2), HIV infection (OR: 6.4, 95% CI: 2.7-14.7), and previous exposure to therapy with protease inhibitors (OR: 3.0, 95% CI:1.4-6.3). In the multivariate analysis; only male sex (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.152-8.773) and HIV infection (OR: 6.85, 95% CI: 2.93-16.005) were associated with advanced liver fibrosis. HIV infection is associated with advanced liver fibrosis. HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals on HAART are at risk of developing end-stage liver disease despite virological success and immunological reconstitution.     

Relationships between cellular immune responses and treatment outcomes with interferon and ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infection

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific interferon (IFN)gamma immune responses are correlated with HCV virological response following treatment in subjects with HIV-1 and HCV co-infection. DESIGN: Immune responses were studied in a treatment trial comparing standard interferon alfa (IFN) to pegylated interferon alfa (PEG-IFN), each with ribavirin (R). METHODS: Using HCV antigens core, NS3 and NS5, and Candida, enzyme-linked immunosorbent spots on peripheral blood mononuclear cells measured IFNgamma and interleukin (IL)-10 production. Immunologic, virologic and clinical variables were modeled using recursive partitioning (CART) to identify factors associated with HCV virological response at week 24 (VR) and week 72 (SVR) in 108 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline IFNgamma immune responses and higher IL-10 to NS3 in subjects with VR versus non-responders. Subjects who had significant decreases in IL-10 responses at week 24 compared to baseline for NS3, NS5, or summed HCV responses were more likely to be VR. Using baseline immunological responses and clinical data in CART models, patients who were randomized to PEG-IFN/R and had high IL-10 responses to summed HCV proteins were more likely to be VR (73%), whereas those on IFN/R who had low IFNgamma responses to Candida were less likely to be VR (5%). The main correlate of SVR for genotype-1 subjects was maintenance of HCV-specific IFNgamma responses from baseline to week 72. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of subjects with HIV and HCV, a decrease in HCV-specific IL-10 responses and maintenance of IFNgamma responses during treatment with IFN were associated with week 24 or 72 virological response.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients

We recently reported an increased incidence of cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. Here, we describe our experience in the treatment of these patients, which has been, to date, poorly reported in the literature. Among 99 HCV-infected HCT recipients, 36 had HCV-related liver lesions on biopsy requiring therapy. Owing to HCV treatment contraindications, only 61% of patients (22/36) could be treated. In all, 12 patients received more than one course of anti-HCV treatment if they had HCV RNA still detectable after the first course of treatment and no treatment contraindications. Combined therapy (pegylated interferon (IFN): n=9, or standard IFN: n=9, in combination with ribavirin) led to sustained virological response in 4/18 (20%) patients as compared to 2/20 (10%) in patients who received IFN alone. Hematological toxicity was more frequent with combined therapy. While anemia responded to erythropoietin and/or dose modification, thrombocytopenia usually led to treatment interruption (n=3). This study thus highlights the efficacy of combined therapy and emphasizes the fact that the undue safety concerns are not a problem when treating this particular population.     

Clinical trial results of peginterferons in combination with ribavirin

Of the large number of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), only about one third have progressive liver disease, and will eventually develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These are the patients for whom effective antiviral treatment is most needed. Therapy is currently recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C who have abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, detectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in the blood, and significant necroinflammatory changes and/or fibrosis on liver biopsy. The current gold standard in terms of treatment efficacy is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin. The overall sustained virological response rate (SVR) with these regimens is 54 to 61% following 48 weeks of therapy. Patients with genotype 1 infection have a 42 to 51% likelihood of response to 48 weeks of therapy. Those with genotypes 2 or 3 infection will respond to 24 weeks of therapy in 78 to 82% of cases. These SVR rates are 5 to 10 percentage points higher in all patient groups than in those obtained with standard doses of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin. Retreatment of nonresponders to standard IFN monotherapy using PEG-IFN and ribavirin has achieved SVR rates of 34 to 40%. Retreatment of patients who relapsed after IFN monotherapy has resulted in an SVR rate of about 60%. A SVR after retreatment of relapsers and nonresponders with PEG-IFN and ribavirin is more likely in patients previously treated with IFN monotherapy, those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, patients with low viral load (<2 million copies/mL), and individuals who had a significant decrease in HCV RNA levels during the initial treatment. The potential benefits of long-term anti-HCV suppressive therapy in nonresponders are currently under investigation.     

Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in patients with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV coinfection of index cases increases intrafamilial transmission (sexual and nonsexual contacts) of HCV. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 347 subjects, including 87 family members of 53 HCV/HIV-coinfected index cases and 134 family members of 73 HCV-monoinfected index cases, which served as a control group. All index cases and family members were interviewed, and a screening for HCV and HIV using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays was performed. Positive samples were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and tested for genotype and HCV RNA viral load. A meta-analysis designed to assess the pooled risk of sexual transmission of HCV among HCV/HIV-coinfected patients was performed. RESULTS: Anti-HCV was detected in 2.2% of family members of HCV-monoinfected index cases and 2.3% of family members of HCV/HIV-coinfected index cases. Viral load was higher in coinfected index cases (7.2 x 10(6) mEq/ml) compared with HCV alone (1.9 x 10(6) mEq/ml), p = 0.01. HCV genotype concordance was observed in three family members of HCV-monoinfected index cases and in two family members of HCV/HIV-coinfected index cases. The pooled OR of the meta-analysis evaluating HIV as a cofactor of sexual transmission of HCV was 1.54 (95% CI = 0.76-3.12). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a low prevalence of intrafamilial transmission of HCV, independent of the presence of HCV/HIV coinfection. This finding is supported by meta-analysis, which failed to identify HIV as an important cofactor of sexual transmission in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients.     

Pilot study of low-dose interleukin-2, pegylated interferon-alpha 2b, and ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with HIV infection

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus have a diminished HCV virologic response to standard interferon (IFN)-based therapies. We explored the strategy of initial immunostimulatory therapy with interleukin (IL)-2, followed by the addition of specific anti-HCV therapy, as a possible synergistic approach to treatment. METHODS: Coinfected subjects (n=23) with CD4 cell counts >300 cells/ micro L received low-dose IL-2 daily for 12 weeks, followed by pegylated IFN- alpha 2b and ribavirin for an additional 48 weeks. The primary end point was permanent discontinuation of treatment before week 24 due to toxicity or intolerance. RESULTS: Six subjects (26.1%) discontinued treatment before week 24, and 11 (47.8%) discontinued treatment before week 60. Overall, 4 subjects discontinued because of adverse events. Four of 23 (17%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-39%) had sustained virologic responses. Of 17 subjects with increased levels of alanine aminotransferase at baseline, 13 had follow-up measurements at week 60, of which 6 (46%) were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose IL-2 plus PEG-IFN and ribavirin was associated with a high discontinuation rate. Although the study was not powered for efficacy, CIs surrounding the treatment response rate suggest that this strategy should not be pursued in larger trials.     

Profile of patients triply infected with HIV and the hepatitis B and C viruses in the HAART era

HIV-HCV-HBV-coinfected patients were assessed to characterize the viral interactions in the setting of HIV coinfection and in the HAART era. All positive anti-HCV antibody and HBs antigen-positive HIV-infected patients were identified at five HIV clinics. Antihepatitis delta (HDV) antibody, serum HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA quantification and genotype determinations were performed. Out of 67 patients identified 47 (70%) were receiving anti-HBV therapy. HCV RNA and HBV DNA were detectable in 52.5% and 37% of patients, respectively. All possible patterns were found, regardless of anti-HBV therapy. HDV coinfection was associated with undetectable HCV RNA [RR 9.52 (95% CI 1.85-49.01); p = 0.007]. Independent factors predicting undetectable HBV DNA lacked HBeAg [RR 13.94 (95% CI 3.05-63.72); p = 0.001] and use of anti-HBV therapy [RR 11.42 (95% CI 2.43-53.54); p = 0.002]. Replication and genotypes of HCV or HBV had no impact on the replication of the other virus. In conclusion, in this cohort of triple infection (HBV/HCV/HIV) various viral patterns were identified. Spontaneous HCV clearance was frequent, and it was independently associated with HDV coinfection. In the absence of HBV therapy, HBV most often actively replicates. HBV/HCV replication or genotypes were not related to the replication of the other virus.     

Preservation of intrahepatic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific CD4+ T cell responses despite global loss of CD4+ T cells in HCV/HIV coinfection

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and low peripheral blood CD4(+) T cell counts are associated with increased hepatitis C liver disease. METHODS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were assessed using interferon (IFN)- gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assays on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and expanded liver lymphocytes from HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects. Cell frequencies were determined using flow cytometry. RESULTS: HIV coinfection was associated with decreased CD4(+) T cell percentages in both peripheral blood (21% vs. 48%; P<.0001) and liver (15% vs. 36%; P<.0001) and with reduced responsiveness of peripheral CD4(+) T cells to HCV antigens compared with HCV monoinfection (22% vs. 45%; P=.021). However, intrahepatic HCV-specific responses were maintained in HCV/HIV coinfection, compared with HCV monoinfection (38% vs. 32%; P=.7). Notably, the presence of HCV-specific responses was not related to the frequency of liver CD4(+) T cells (P=.4). Circulating and liver CD4(+) T cell percentages were correlated (r=0.58; P<.0001). Circulating percentages were also inversely associated with liver fibrosis stage among HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects (P=.029). Neither hepatic CD4(+) T cell percentages nor HCV-specific IFN- gamma responses in the liver or periphery predicted stage. CONCLUSIONS: Despite decreases in peripheral blood HCV-specific CD4(+) T cell responses and intrahepatic CD4(+) T cell percentages, intrahepatic HCV-specific CD4(+) IFN- gamma responses were preserved in HCV/HIV coinfection.     

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: sustained virologic response is related to genotype 2/3 and response at week 12

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is a major cause of transplant failure in HCV-positive patients. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy and determined the factors influencing sustained virologic response (SVR) in LT recipients. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2007, we treated 36 LT recipients for hepatitis C cirrhosis and subsequent HCV recurrence (27 genotype 1 and 9 genotypes 2/3) with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (180 microg/week), pegylated interferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg per week), or standard interferon alpha-2b (3 MIU 3X/week) plus ribavirin (600-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: SVR was achieved in seven of 27 (26%) of genotype 1 patients versus nine of nine (100%) genotype 2/3 patients (P=0.0001). Early virologic response at week 12 was associated with permanent viral clearance. Side effects included cytopenia and acute hearing loss, but rate of therapy withdrawal and dose reduction was low. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy in patients with HCV reinfection after LT yields an excellent SVR rate in genotype 2/3 patients, but remains unsatisfactory in genotype 1 patients. Virologic response at week 12 (early virologic response) can determine whether therapy should be continued or not.