Paediatric use of intensive care

OBJECTIVES--To determine the number of children from a defined population who use intensive care facilities, to analyse bed occupancy data for those children, and to estimate the number of intensive care beds required to satisfy this demand throughout the year. DESIGN--Examination of admission data books from intensive care units within the four Birmingham health authorities and the neighbouring health authorities. RESULTS--Two hundred and ninety seven children resident within the four Birmingham health authorities used intensive care facilities in a calendar year. One hundred and forty one (47%) of these were admitted for specialist paediatric services. Of the remaining 156, 106 (68%) were cared for in adult intensive care units, 46 (29%) in a paediatric intensive care unit and four (3%) in a special care baby unit. Use of intensive care varied from none to 11 patients each day, and was lowest in the summer and highest during the winter months. During periods of peak demand, one in 19,000 (5.3/100,000) children were using intensive care facilities. CONCLUSIONS--These data provide a population based minimum need for paediatric intensive care beds. They are higher than previous estimates and do not include provision for children from outside Birmingham, or for those denied intensive care due to bed shortages. These factors and the marked seasonal variation in demand need to be considered when planning intensive care services for children if bed shortages are to be avoided.     

The burden of paediatric intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand perspective

Most seriously ill children in Australia and New Zealand are cared for in specialised intensive care units associated with tertiary children's hospitals. Highly regionalised models of care are in operation. Children from remote areas are transported to intensive care by paediatric emergency transport services. Indigenous children have disease and injury patterns similar to parts of the developing world and are over-represented in the intensive care population. The outcome for children admitted to intensive care compares favourably with international benchmarks. There is also evidence of uniformity of outcomes across paediatric intensive care units in the region and that outcomes have been improving. Although there are some downward pressures on intensive care workloads (preventative strategies such as immunisation, safety campaigns), these are counterbalanced by new surgical initiatives and increasing expectations of extended high tech support for children with life shortening diseases and disabilities. This expanding group of technology-dependent children will be one of the major challenges facing health authorities and intensive care physicians in this region in the coming decade.     

Characteristics of neonatal intensive care unit patients in North Carolina: a cross-sectional survey

A shortage of neonatal intensive care facilities has been encountered in some areas of the country including North Carolina. To examine possible solutions to this health care delivery problem, a cross-sectional survey of all the neonatal intensive care units in North Carolina was performed to examine characteristics of patients occupying the beds in these facilities. It was found that a substantial amount of chronic care is now occurring in neonatal intensive care beds, with 38% of occupants of neonatal intensive care beds being 31 days of age or older and 3% being mechanically ventilated at 91 days of age or older. In addition, according to criteria established for this study, a substantial number of "convalescent" patients (32%) were occupying beds in neonatal intensive care units. It is concluded that an increase in both intermediate/convalescent care beds and establishment of chronic care facilities in North Carolina, rather than an increase in intensive care beds in these units, would alleviate the shortage of neonatal intensive care facilities. Further, the characteristics of the population occupying neonatal intensive care unit beds should be considered by health planners in addition to occupancy rate, when new facilities are being established.     

Calculation of the need for paediatric intensive care beds.

A study of paediatric intensive care usage and need was undertaken in the former English Northern region to define appropriate local provision in the light of apparently conflicting published evidence. It was hypothesised that daily bed need would follow a Poisson distribution. All admissions of children aged less than 15 years who required intensive care in the region were recorded retrospectively for the financial year 1993/4. The mean number of beds occupied was 11.7 per day, which is equivalent to 20.7 beds per million children per day. The distribution of numbers of beds used mirrored a Poisson distribution closely, and the predicted bed requirement to cover 95% of days in the year was in agreement with that observed. Review of recommendations for paediatric intensive care provision from other studies suggests that apparent differences arise largely from the effect of different sizes of population served, and that, when allowance is made for this, underlying rates of bed requirement are strikingly similar, with a mean of around 20 per million children per day. A formula is given for the application of this model to local populations.     

Quantifying high dependency care: a prospective cohort study in Yorkshire (UK)

High dependency care (HDC) is a level of care situated between intensive care and usual ward care with its delivery being independent of location. Inadequate definition makes it problematic to determine the number of children receiving HDC, to identify their care setting and therefore to undertake service planning. We aimed to estimate the volume of hospital inpatient HDC in a geographically defined population using a customised measurement tool in four types of paediatric hospital services (1) tertiary specialist wards, (2) tertiary paediatric intensive care units, (3) district general hospitals (DGHs) general wards and (4) wards at a major acute general hospital. A region-wide prospective cohort study during 2005 collected data to develop a 36-item HDC measurement tool, which then identified children receiving HDC by day and night. The cohort identified 1,763 children as receiving HDC during an admission to 1 of 36 hospital wards in 14 hospitals. HDC was delivered during 9,077 shift periods of 12 h or 4,538 bed days. The volume of care and patient profiles varied by hospital type, within hospital by ward type and by age and season. Tertiary specialist wards and ICUs provided 72% of HDC, with the remainder delivered at the DGHs and the major acute general hospital. The volume of admissions to tertiary specialist wards showed little seasonality and children tended to be older (26% were aged 10–15 years). By comparison, admissions to DGHs were younger with an excess during the winter months. This is the first UK study to quantify HDC from empirical data encompassing all hospital and ward types within a large clinical network. A lack of HDC-designated beds across the region resulted in HDC delivery on all types of hospital wards. The study size and representativeness makes the estimated number of HDC bed days per head of population likely to reflect the wider UK population.     

The burden of paediatric intensive care: a South American perspective

Paediatric intensive care is a relatively new medical specialty that has shown a marked growing up around the world over the last three decades. The limits and the development of this new specialty are not uniform from country to country. Original articles relating to paediatric intensive care and some South American data bases of health care were evaluated and relevant results were selected. Using these data, we describe the main characteristics of paediatric intensive care in South America and discuss some associated factors (e.g. economic aspects, health systems, ethical aspects) that could interfere with the quality and extent of care. A strong relationship between the financial stability of each region and the complexity and quality of paediatric intensive care was seen. A better coverage and more sophisticated paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are concentrated in the more developed countries (Brazil, Chile and Argentina). Compared to the northern hemisphere, children admitted to the South American PICUs have higher mortality and higher rates of intervention (mechanical ventilation and indwelling catheters). Medical paternalism has a strong influence in the decision-making process offered to terminally ill patients. This phenomenon increases the length of stay, reduces the number of available beds and increases costs. In conclusion, during the last 20 years PICUs have developed and increased their coverage in South America. However, the most sophisticated and well equipped PICUs are preferentially located in the more developed areas whereas those areas with higher infant mortality rates have few PICU beds. Improvements in the economical stability, regional health organisation as well as the rationale for PICU localisation are some of the important goals to be reached in the near future.     

Parent experiences of paediatric care (PEPC) questionnaire: reliability and validity following a national survey

AIM: To describe the development and evaluation of a parent completed questionnaire to measure parent experiences of inpatient paediatric care, the parent experiences of paediatric care (PEPC). METHODS: Literature review, parent interviews, pre-testing and a national survey of 6144 parents of children who were inpatients at one of the 20 paediatric departments within Norway in 2005. RESULTS: Three thousand three hundred and eight (53.8%) parents responded to the questionnaire. Low levels of missing data suggest that the PEPC is acceptable. The questionnaire includes six scales as supported by the results of factor analysis: nursing services (seven items), doctor services (five items), organisation (four items), information--examinations and tests (two items), information--discharge (three items) and hospital facilities (four items). Cronbach's alpha and test-retest correlations ranged from 0.7 to 0.9. Comparisons of scale scores with several variables including overall satisfaction with care and pain control, supported validity. CONCLUSION: The PEPC questionnaire includes important aspects of hospital care from the perspective of the parent. It has good evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and validity and is recommended in surveys of parent experiences of paediatric inpatient care.     

Short stay facilities: the future of efficient paediatric emergency services.

Many children admitted to hospital can stay for 24 hours or less. Short stay facilities offer such children rapid stabilisation and early discharge with considerable financial saving. A 12 month study was completed in which data were collected from the children''s emergency annex (CEA) at Westmead Hospital in Sydney''s western suburbs. This university based teaching hospital provides care for a large paediatric population as well as three other district hospitals with limited children''s bed capacity. From April 1994 to April 1995, 1300 children were admitted and entered into a database of general and hospital-specific information. Critical incident monitoring was undertaken and follow up with review within 24-72 hours for all children. The CEA increased hospital efficiency significantly by reducing bed days, with a saving of over $500,000 to the department. The average length of stay was 17.5 hours, and 58% of users were children of 2 years and under. Only 3% remained beyond 24 hours, and another 4% were admitted to inpatient beds for continued management of the primarily diagnosed condition. No critical incident was reported during this 12 month period. Short stay facilities are efficient and cost-effective for children with acute illness who can be rapidly stabilised with early discharge without critical incident. Children 12 months and under are particularly suited to this type of facility. Short stay facilities should be used to augment efficiency within children''s emergency services which have high turnover and limited bed capacity.     

Ability of hospitals to care for pediatric emergency patients.

CONTEXT: The needs of children in emergency situations differ from those of adults and require special attention, yet there has been no study of the ability of U.S. hospitals to care for emergently or critically ill children. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the distribution of pediatric services available at U.S. hospitals with emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN: Self-report survey of 101 hospital EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified probability sample of all U.S. hospitals operating EDs. RESULTS: The majority of hospitals that usually admit pediatric patients do not have separate pediatric facilities. Hospitals without a pediatric department, ward, or trauma service usually transfer critically injured pediatric trauma patients; however, nearly 10% of hospitals without pediatric intensive care facilities admit critically injured children to their own facilities. Likewise, 7% of hospitals routinely admit pediatric patients known to require intensive care to their adult intensive care units rather than transferring the patient to a facility with pediatric intensive care facilities. Few hospitals have protocols for obtaining pediatric consultation on pediatric emergencies. Appropriately sized equipment for successful care of infants and children in an emergency situation was more likely to be missing than adult-sized equipment, and significant numbers of hospitals did not have adequate equipment to care for newborn emergencies. CONCLUSION: Emergent and critical care of infants and children may not be well integrated and regionalized within our health care system, suggesting that there is room for improvement in the quality of care for children encountering emergent illness and trauma.     

Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study

AIMS—To determine the extent of futile care provided to critically ill children admitted to a paediatric intensive care setting.METHODS—Prospective evaluation of consecutive admissions to a 20 bedded multidisciplinary paediatric intensive care unit of a North London teaching hospital over a nine month period. Three previously defined criteria for futility were used: (1) imminent demise futility (those with a mortality risk greater than 90% using the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM II) score); (2) lethal condition futility (those with conditions incompatible with long term survival); and (3) qualitative futility (those with unacceptable quality of life and high morbidity).RESULTS—A total of 662 children accounting for 3409 patient bed days were studied. Thirty four patients fulfilled at least one of the criteria for futility, and used a total of 104 bed days (3%). Only 33 (0.9%) bed days were used by patients with mortality risk greater than 90%, 60 (1.8%) by patients with poor long term prognosis, and 16 (0.5%) by those with poor quality of life. Nineteen of 34 patients died; withdrawal of treatment was the mode of death in 15 (79%).CONCLUSIONS—Cost containment initiatives focusing on futility in the paediatric intensive care unit setting are unlikely to be successful as only relatively small amounts of resources were used in providing futile care. Paediatricians are recognising futility early and may have taken ethically appropriate measures to limit care that is futile.     

Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study.

AIMS: To determine the extent of futile care provided to critically ill children admitted to a paediatric intensive care setting. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of consecutive admissions to a 20 bedded multidisciplinary paediatric intensive care unit of a North London teaching hospital over a nine month period. Three previously defined criteria for futility were used: (1) imminent demise futility (those with a mortality risk greater than 90% using the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM II) score); (2) lethal condition futility (those with conditions incompatible with long term survival); and (3) qualitative futility (those with unacceptable quality of life and high morbidity). RESULTS: A total of 662 children accounting for 3409 patient bed days were studied. Thirty four patients fulfilled at least one of the criteria for futility, and used a total of 104 bed days (3%). Only 33 (0.9%) bed days were used by patients with mortality risk greater than 90%, 60 (1.8%) by patients with poor long term prognosis, and 16 (0.5%) by those with poor quality of life. Nineteen of 34 patients died; withdrawal of treatment was the mode of death in 15 (79%). CONCLUSIONS: Cost containment initiatives focusing on futility in the paediatric intensive care unit setting are unlikely to be successful as only relatively small amounts of resources were used in providing futile care. Paediatricians are recognising futility early and may have taken ethically appropriate measures to limit care that is futile.     

Guias de ingreso,alta y triage para las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos en España

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition.     

Recent trends in hospital use by children in England.

BACKGROUND: Routine hospital statistics for England appear to overestimate use of children's wards and include numbers of well newborn babies staying with their mothers after delivery ("well babies"). AIM: To review trends in use of children's wards excluding data on newborn babies. METHODS: We reviewed routine, published, and age stratified data requested from the Department of Health to identify separately "well babies" and babies receiving neonatal specialist care from admissions (surgical and paediatric) to children's wards. RESULTS: Routine reports for paediatric activity contain large numbers of "well babies", (almost half the total) as well as babies receiving specialist neonatal care. After excluding these, paediatric admissions represent 9.9% of the child population aged under 5 years each year (an additional 2.5% are admitted for surgical care). Between 1989 and 1997 paediatric admissions rose by 19% and surgical admissions fell by 25% with a plateau reached in overall child admissions. There are now fewer beds in which children stay for a shorter time and there is more day case surgery. Neonatal specialist care work has risen despite a fall in births. CONCLUSION: Categories should be established for reporting paediatric episodes on children's wards separately from those on neonatal units, with better identification of "well babies". When monitoring use of children's inpatient facilities or planning new units, care must be taken to separate paediatric data on neonatal units from work on children's wards. Children's surgical episodes should also be taken into account.     

Risk adjusted mortality of critical illness in a defined geographical region.

AIMS: To evaluate the performance of the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score in a population of UK children and to use this score to examine severity of illness adjusted mortality of critically ill children <16 years old in a defined geographical region. METHODS: Observational study of a defined population of critically ill children (<16 years old) admitted to hospitals in the South West Region between 1 December 1996 and 30 November 1998. RESULTS: Data were collected from 1148 eligible admissions. PRISM was found to perform acceptably in this population. There was no significant difference between the overall number of observed deaths and those predicted by PRISM. Admissions with mortality risk 30% or greater had significantly greater odds ratio for death in general intensive care units compared with the tertiary paediatric intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a high initial risk of mortality based on PRISM score were significantly more likely to survive in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit than in general intensive care units in this region. However, there was no evidence from this study that admissions with lower mortality risk than 30% had significantly worse mortality in non-tertiary general units than in tertiary paediatric intensive care units.     

Risk adjusted mortality of critical illness in a defined geographical region

Aims: To evaluate the performance of the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score in a population of UK children and to use this score to examine severity of illness adjusted mortality of critically ill children <16 years old in a defined geographical region. Methods: Observational study of a defined population of critically ill children (<16 years old) admitted to hospitals in the South West Region between 1 December 1996 and 30 November 1998. Results: Data were collected from 1148 eligible admissions. PRISM was found to perform acceptably in this population. There was no significant difference between the overall number of observed deaths and those predicted by PRISM. Admissions with mortality risk 30% or greater had significantly greater odds ratio for death in general intensive care units compared with the tertiary paediatric intensive care unit. Conclusions: Children with a high initial risk of mortality based on PRISM score were significantly more likely to survive in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit than in general intensive care units in this region. However, there was no evidence from this study that admissions with lower mortality risk than 30% had significantly worse mortality in non-tertiary general units than in tertiary paediatric intensive care units.     

A survey of pediatric intensive care services in Turkey

The aim of this study was to describe and assess the structure, organization, and staffing of pediatric intensive care services in Turkey. A survey was sent to major university and government hospitals. Out of the 40 hospitals stating to provide pediatric intensive care, 34 responded to the survey (85% response rate). In the majority (81.2%) of hospitals, pediatric intensive care was provided in single room units or within the pediatric ward. Unit size ranged from 1-16 beds with an average of 6.8 +/- 4.2 operational beds per unit. Much of the equipment and a sufficient number of specialists for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care were present in the surveyed hospitals. However, only 12 units had a pediatric intensivist on staff and few had special PICU nurses. Many hospitals in Turkey already have various equipment and specialists needed to support pediatric intensive care. Expansion of services and improved care could be achieved if more pediatric intensivists and nurses could be provided and services concentrated in fully equipped tertiary centers.     

No resuscitation orders and withdrawal of therapy in French paediatric intensive care units

Objective: To determine the incidence of different modes of death in French paediatric intensive care units and to compare patients' characteristics, including a severity of illness score (Paediatric Risk of Mortality: PRISM score) and prior health status (Paediatric Overall Performance Category scale), according to the mode of death. Design: A 4-month prospective cohort study. Setting: Nine French multidisciplinary paediatric intensive care units. Patients: All patients who died in PICUs, except premature babies. Main results: Among 712 admissions, 13% patients died. Brain death was declared in 20%, failure of cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurred in 26%, do-not-resuscitate status was identified in 27%, and withdrawal of supportive therapy was noted in 27%. The PRISM score and the baseline Paediatric Overall Performance Category were not different between the four groups. Brain-dead patients were older than those in whom a do-not-resuscitate order and withdrawal of therapy were made (median age 81 vs 7 and 4 months). Conclusions: Decisions to limit or to withdraw supportive care were made for a majority of patients dying in French paediatric intensive care units. Chronic health evaluation and severity of illness index are not sufficient to describe dead-patient populations.     

Interhospital transport to paediatric intensive care by specialised staff: experience of the South Thames combined transport service, 1998-2000

The South London Combined Transport Service retrieved 1536 children aged 1 month to 16 years to paediatric intensive care (PIC) units usually in south London, over a 2.5 year period. Eighty one per cent of cases were for general PIC, the specialist cases being mainly cardiac and neurosurgical. The service commenced as part of a national framework for improved PIC and offers children with complex needs a safe specialist transfer. Clinician and parental satisfaction with the service appears high, although there are considerable service pressures. Intensive care beds were successfully located, helping to reduce fragmentation of PIC for this population.     

Interhospital transport to paediatric intensive care by specialised staff: experience of the South Thames combined transport service, 1998-2000.

The South London Combined Transport Service retrieved 1536 children aged 1 month to 16 years to paediatric intensive care (PIC) units usually in south London, over a 2.5 year period. Eighty one per cent of cases were for general PIC, the specialist cases being mainly cardiac and neurosurgical. The service commenced as part of a national framework for improved PIC and offers children with complex needs a safe specialist transfer. Clinician and parental satisfaction with the service appears high, although there are considerable service pressures. Intensive care beds were successfully located, helping to reduce fragmentation of PIC for this population.     

Treated prevalence of and mental health services received by children and adolescents in 42 low-and-middle-income countries

Background: Little is known about the treated prevalence and services received by children and adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LAMICs). The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics and capacity of mental health services for children and adolescents in 42 LAMICs. Methods: The World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO‐AIMS), a 155‐indicator instrument developed to assess key components of mental health service systems, was used to describe mental health services in 13 low, 24 lower‐middle, and 5 upper‐middle‐income countries. Child and adolescent service indicators used in the analysis were drawn from Domains 2 (mental health services), 4 (human resources), and 5 (links with other sectors) of the WHO‐AIMS instrument. Results: The median one‐year treated prevalence for children and adolescents is 159 per 100,000 population compared to a treated prevalence of 664 per 100,000 for the adult population. Children and adolescents make up 12% of the patient population in mental health outpatient facilities and less than 6% in all other types of mental health facilities. Less than 1% of beds in inpatient facilities are reserved for children and adolescents. Training provided for mental health professionals on child and adolescent mental health is minimal, with less than 1% receiving refresher training. Most countries (76%) organize educational campaigns on child and adolescent mental health. Conclusions: Mental health services for children and adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries are extremely scarce and greatly limit access to appropriate care. Scaling up of services resources will be necessary in order to meet the objectives of the WHO Mental Health Gap Action (mhGAP) program which identifies increased services for the treatment of child mental disorders as a priority.