Torasemide (LUPRAC): a review of its pharmacological and clinical profile

Loop diuretics potently excrete water and electrolytes and therefore have been widely prescribed for the treatment of various kinds of edema for a long time. The potent diuretic action of loop diuretics, however, often causes hypokalemia, and therefore potassium sparing diuretics have also been supplied as a concomitant drug. Torasemide (LUPRAC), a novel diuretics, shows not only an effective loop diuretic action but also a potassium sparing action due to its anti-aldosteronergic effect. Torasemide also has a high bioavailability and is only slightly influenced by meals in humans. In addition, its pharmacodynamic features contribute to its stable diuretic action without any individual differences. In animal experiments, torasemide showed about a tenfold more potent diuretic action in comparison with furosemide, an authentic loop diuretic. On the one hand, the increase in the urinary potassium excretion by torasemide was relatively slight compared to the increase in urinary sodium excretion and, as a result, the urinary sodium to potassium (Na+/K+) ratio increased. The diuretic profile of torasemide was equal to that of the concomitant use of furosemide and an anti-aldosteronergic drug, spironolactone. Torasemide showed a significant efficacy and safety in comparison with furosemide in the patients with edema in both domestic and foreign clinical studies. Moreover, torasemide also showed a decreased rate of cardiac death in comparison to furosemide in patients with chronic heart failure in a large-scale clinical study (TORIC Study). The difference in cardiac death between these two diuretics has been suggested to depend on the anti-aldosteronergic effect of torasemide. In Japan, no new loop diuretics have been developed in over 10 years. Torasemide is therefore expected to be useful as an effective diuretic for diseases with edema.     

Torasemide for the treatment of heart failure

Diuretics play an essential role in modern cardiovascular therapy, and are currently recommended for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Torasemide has been developed as a newer type of loop diuretic with a longer half-life, longer duration of action, and higher bioavailability compared to the most commonly used loop diuretic, furosemide. Torasemide also appears to have additional actions beyond the pure diuretic effect, such as anti-aldosterone effect and vasorelaxation effect. Studies have also investigated whether the superior pharmacokinetics and pharmacological activity of torasemide result in a favorable clinical outcome. Their results have indicated that, in comparison with furosemide, torasemide improves left ventricular function, reduces mortality as well as the frequency and duration of heart failure-related hospitalization, and improves quality of life, exercise tolerance and NYHA functional class in patients with congestive heart failure. Thus, torasemide appears to be a promising loop diuretic that contributes to a better management of patients with heart failure. Definitive clinical trials in a double-blind fashion are warranted.     

EFFECTS OF TORASEMIDE ON RENAL HAEMODYNAMICS AND FUNCTION IN ANAESTHETIZED DOGS

1. We examined the effects of torasemide (0.3 and 1 mg/kg i.v.) on renal haemodynamics and function employing renal clearance and stop-flow techniques in anaesthetized dogs and compared these with furosemide (1 and 3 mg/kg i.v.). 2. Torasemide and furosemide did not influence renal haemodynamics, in the renal clearance study, but caused a dose-related and significant increase in urine flow and urinary excretion of sodium and potassium. Torasemide and furosemide increased fractional excretion of sodium in the distal tubules with a relatively small increase in the fractional excretion of lithium (index of sodium excretion at the proximal tubules, FELi). The diuretic profile of torasemide was of long duration, compared with that of furosemide. 3. Torasemide and furosemide inhibited sodium reabsorption at the distal portion of the tubules in the stop-flow study. 4. It is suggested from these results, that the main diuretic site of action of torasemide is the ascending limb of the loop of Henlé.     

Piretanide. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy

Piretanide is a potent 'loop' diuretic whose principal site of action is in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. When administered orally or intravenously to healthy volunteers it rapidly increases diuresis and electrolyte excretion, and the effects are short-lived. In comparative studies, piretanide has generally been found to be 5 to 7 times more potent than frusemide (furosemide) but only one-tenth as potent as bumetanide, on a weight-for-weight basis. Piretanide 6 to 12 mg/day, in conventional or sustained release formulations, has been shown to significantly lower elevated blood pressure in a large proportion of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Comparative trials of up to 3 months duration indicate that at this dosage piretanide is of comparable antihypertensive efficacy as hydrochlorothiazide 50 to 100 mg/day, but has significantly less effect on serum potassium levels. Short term studies in patients with oedema caused by renal, hepatic or cardiac failure demonstrated that piretanide 6 to 9 mg is of similar diuretic potency as frusemide 40 mg and bumetanide 1 mg. In medium term trials in patients with congestive heart failure piretanide 6 mg/day produced equivalent symptomatic improvement as frusemide 40 mg/day. When used to treat oedema caused by liver disease, piretanide 12 to 24 mg/day was successful in only about 50% of patients, but spironolactone added to the treatment regimen greatly increased the response rate. Generally, piretanide has been well-tolerated in clinical trials, although the conventional tablet formulation has caused a relatively high incidence of acute adverse effects--these were greatly reduced with the introduction of the sustained release formulation. Serum concentrations of most electrolytes have not shown any consistent adverse trends and hyperuricaemia and hypokalaemia have been encountered infrequently. Thus, piretanide appears to offer an effective alternative to other 'loop' diuretics for the treatment of oedematous diseases and to hydrochlorothiazide for the management of mild to moderate hypertension. However, its relative place in therapy remains to be clarified with wider clinical experience.     

新型袢利尿剂托拉塞米

综述托拉塞米的药理作用、药动学、临床应用、药物不良反应和药物经济学。托拉塞米属吡啶磺酰脲类袢利尿剂，作用于髓袢升支粗段，抑制Cl^ 和Na^ 的重吸收，产生利尿、利钠和其他作用。其生物利用度高，半衰期相对较长，血浆蛋白结合率较高。临床试验表明，托拉塞米治疗高血压和慢性肾功能衰竭、肝功能不全或心力衰竭患者的水肿和其他症状有效，不良反应较轻。药物经济学分析表明，托拉塞米通过降低住院率和再住院率而降低总花费。     

Xipamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Xipamide is a diuretic derived from salicylic acid and has a structural resemblance to chlorthalidone. Its pharmacodynamic profile shows a diuretic efficacy is similar to that of frusemide (furosemide) at doses up to 40 mg, but the onset and duration of action are comparable to those of hydrochlorothiazide. Xipamide has been studied mostly in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, with few controlled studies of its use in oedematous states. The efficacy of xipamide 20 to 40 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension is comparable to that of bendrofluazide 5 mg, bumetanide 1 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg when used alone in newly treated or previously treated patients. The addition of xipamide 20 to 40 mg daily to regimens containing beta-blockers, adrenergic neuron-blocking drugs and/or methyldopa has resulted in a further reduction in blood pressure. A few studies in oedematous states suggest that xipamide 40 to 80 mg is comparable in efficacy to equal doses of frusemide, and that the side effects of hypokalaemia, hyperuricaemia and increased blood glucose in diabetics or latent diabetics are similar to those of other diuretics. Thus, xipamide is a suitable alternative to other diuretics in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and combines the efficacy of frusemide with a less abrupt action in the treatment of oedema.     

Torasemide: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure.

Torasemide is a loop diuretic used for the treatment of hypertension and for oedema in chronic heart failure (CHF), renal failure and cirrhosis. The efficacy of torasemide in reducing salt and water retention in CHF has been established in double-blind comparative studies against furosemide. Torasemide has been shown to be at least as effective as furosemide in terms of total volume of urine excreted and also has a longer duration of action. The efficacy of torasemide (in terms of improved CHF symptoms and reduced pulmonary congestion, oedema and bodyweight) has been shown in randomised controlled trials and confirmed in large postmarketing studies. In addition, data from postmarketing studies have shown that patients receiving torasemide had significantly reduced hospital admission rates compared with patients receiving furosemide. Pharmacoeconomic assessments of torasemide have focused on its effect in reducing hospitalisation. Hospitalisation costs due to CHF decreased by 86% during the 11.2-month period of torasemide treatment, compared with the 6-month period prior to treatment, in a US retrospective study assessing medical and pharmacy claims data. Overall, average monthly costs for patients decreased by 56.6% after 5.1 months (from $US1,897.28 to $US823.70 per patient per month; PPPM), and by 76% after 11.2 months (from $US1,944.76 to $US470.76 PPPM) of torasemide treatment. In the furosemide group, average monthly costs for patients increased moderately from $US227.28 to $US261.18 PPPM after 12 months. Direct comparison of the torasemide and furosemide study groups was not possible because the group receiving torasemide had much higher healthcare resource use at baseline. Compared with furosemide, torasemide was associated with reduced rates of hospital admissions for CHF and/or cardiovascular causes in 3 studies, a retrospective analysis conducted in Germany, a prospective US study of patients enrolled from hospital admissions and a decision-analysis model. As a result, the direct costs of treatment for CHF or cardiovascular diseases for patients treated with torasemide were less than those with furosemide. However, in the US study, there was no statistically significant difference in hospital admissions for all causes and/or in overall direct medical costs, although the study was not powered to show this. In another US study of managed care patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF, no difference in clinical or economic outcomes was observed between patients taking torasemide or furosemide; despite the higher acquisition costs for torasemide, total costs were similar for both groups. Torasemide was found to be more cost effective than furosemide in terms of cost per patient with improved functional (NYHA) class of CHF severity in a retrospective German analysis, although this measure is not ideal. This study also evaluated indirect costs (for loss of productivity of employed patients) and resultssuggest torasemide has a favourable effect in reducing days off work compared with furosemide, although the population of employed patients in the study was very small. Torasemide has been shown to improve some measures of quality of life in 2 studies. It was associated with higher quality-of-life scores than furosemide in a 6-month study, but the differences were only significant at month 4. In another study, torasemide significantly improved fatigue, but full study details are yet to be published. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher acquisition cost of torasemide over furosemide, pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown that torasemide is likely to reduce overall treatment costs of CHF by reducing hospital admissions and readmissions. Torasemide has generally shown clinical and economic advantages over furosemide, although more long term data are needed to confirm these results and to further investigate effects on quality of life. There are limitations to the currently available pharmacoeconomic data, but present data support the use of torasemide as a first-line option for diuretic therapy in patients with CHF presenting with oedema and especially in those patients not achieving relief of symptoms with furosemide.     

Anti-aldosteronergic effect of torasemide.

The diuretic actions of torasemide and furosemide were studied in normotensive rats and in deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-saline-loaded hypertensive rats. Torasemide (0.3-3 mg/kg) and furosemide (3-30 mg/kg) had a dose-dependent and significant diuretic action in normotensive rats. Potassium retention was only observed in the case of torasemide. Torasemide also had a dose-dependent and significant diuretic action in DOCA-saline-loaded hypertensive rats, whereas furosemide did not. Higher doses of torasemide (10 mg/kg) and furosemide (100 mg/kg) increased both plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration in normotensive rats in a similar manner. In vivo aldosterone receptor binding was determined to test the possible anti-aldosteronergic effect of torasemide. Torasemide inhibited the binding of aldosterone to its receptor in the cytoplasmic fraction of rat kidney in a dose-dependent manner, while furosemide produced no effect. These results suggest strongly that an anti-aldosteronergic action of torasemide contributes to producing less kaliuresis.     

Diuretic and hypotensive actions of torasemide in hypertensive models of rat

The diuretic and the antihypertensive actions of torasemide were examined in renal and genetic hypertensive rats and compared to the effects of furosemide. Oral administration of torasemide (1 and 3 mg/kg) elicited a dose-dependent increase in the excretion of urine and electrolytes and elevated the urinary Na/K ratio in both renal and genetic hypertensive rats. Torasemide and furosemide had a similar maximum diuretic effect in the normotensive Wistar rat and the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). However, the diuretic activity of furosemide was weaker in the renal hypertensive rat (RHR). Torasemide showed approximately 30 times greater diuretic potency than furosemide. Torasemide and furosemide demonstrated hypotensive action in hypertensive rat models, but not in the normotensive Wistar rat. Especially in the RHR, torasemide exhibited a more potent hypotensive action than furosemide. These results show that the diuretic and antihypertensive activities of torasemide are effective in various rat models of hypertension, while the diuretic activity of furosemide is weak in certain hypertensive rat models. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Diuretic profile of a novel loop diuretic torasemide in rats and dogs.

In the present study, the authors have examined the diuretic action of a novel loop diuretic torasemide and compared it to those of other diuretics, employing normal rats and dogs. Oral administration of torasemide elicited a dose-dependent increase in urine volume and electrolyte excretion, and elevated the urinary Na/K ratio in rats. These effects were more potent than those of the other diuretics furosemide, trichlormethiazide, indapamide and spironolactone. Moreover, torasemide exhibited a similar or higher urinary Na/K ratio than the combination of these diuretics and spironolactone. In a study employing anaesthetized dogs, i.v. injection of torasemide resulted in a higher urinary Na/K ratio in comparison to furosemide, in addition to potent and long-lasting diuretic activity.     

Pharmacological properties of the new potent diuretic torasemide in rats and dogs

Torasemide, a pyridine-3-sulfonylurea derivative, has potent diuretic activity in rats and dogs. In both species urinary volume and electrolyte excretion increased linearly with the logarithm of the dose, thus resembling the profile of a high ceiling diuretic. The minimum effective dose by oral route was 0.2 mg/kg in the rat and less that 0.1 mg/kg in the dog. Maximal effect was obtained with about 10 mg/kg. Experiments by oral and i.v. routes in the rat indicated that torasemide was equally potent by both oral and parenteral administration. In both rats and dogs, urinary excretions induced by torasemide were similar to those obtained with furosemide. However, for the same natriuretic effect, potassium losses with torasemide were significantly less than with furosemide. On a weight basis, torasemide was 9-40 times more potent than furosemide in the rat and about 10 times in the dog. After oral administration the diuretic effects of torasemide started within 20 min and lasted approximately 2 h in the rat and more than 8 h in the dog. The activity of torasemide was not decreased after a repeated daily oral dose of 10 mg/kg for 15 days in the rat. Torasemide at a daily oral dose of 5 mg/kg for 12 days effectively reduced the arterial blood pressure in desoxycortone induced hypertension in the rat. Besides the diuretic and antihypertensive effects no other significant pharmacological effects were observed with torasemide in the different in vitro and in vivo experiments. Torasemide was practically fully absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, its bioavailability by oral route ranged from 80 to 100%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Vasodilatory action of loop diuretics: a plethysmography study of endothelial function in forearm arteries and dorsal hand veins in hypertensive patients and controls

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous administration of loop diuretics induces venodilation before the diuretic response. We investigated whether furosemide and torasemide exert a dilatory effect on arteries and veins mediated by endothelial release of nitric oxide. METHODS: We performed intermittent venous occlusion plethysmography to study forearm blood flow and dorsal hand-vein distension in response to furosemide and torasemide infusion in hypertensive patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Furosemide increased venodilation from 0.56 +/- 0.09 to 0.88 +/- 0.06 (P=0.000) in control subjects and from 0.49 +/- 0.10 to 0.75 +/- 0.12 (P=0.000) in hypertensive patients. Torasemide increased venodilation from 0.46 +/- 0.06 to 0.70 +/- 0.11 (P=0.007) in control subjects and from 0.48 +/- 0.09 to 0.67 +/- 0.12 (P = 0.03) in hypertensive patients. Co-infusion of the Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor (L-NMMA)-blocked this venodilation, and the action was reversed with L-arginine. There were no significant changes in the arterial bed. CONCLUSIONS: Furosemide and torasemide induce a similar dose-response curve venodilation, but they have no effect on the arterial bed. Hypertensive patients show a smaller venous endothelium-dependent response than healthy controls. The venodilation induced by both diuretics requires release of nitric oxide.     

Comparative effects of torasemide and furosemide in rats with heart failure

It has been reported that torasemide but not furosemide, may block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and therefore it might attenuate myocardial remodeling accompanied by left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We therefore compared the therapeutic effects of torasemide, a long-acting loop diuretic, and furosemide, a short-acting one, on the progression of LV remodeling in a rat model of chronic heart failure (CHF) after experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM). CHF was elicited in Lewis rats by immunization with porcine cardiac myosin. Twenty-eight days after immunization, rats were treated for 28 days with torasemide, furosemide, or vehicle. We investigated the effects on metabolic and neurohumoral parameters, cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in EAM rats. Diuresis was increased dose dependently by both torasemide and furosemide, showed an equipotent natriuretic effect. The urinary potassium excretion was significantly increased with furosemide in comparison to torasemide. Myocardial functional parameters were significantly improved by torasemide. Conversely, these parameters did not change in rats receiving furosemide. Torasemide suppressed LV fibrosis, myocardial protein levels of transforming growth factor-beta1, collagen III, and aldosterone synthase and improved survival rate to the control level, but furosemide did not. Moreover, both pharmacological interventions significantly elevated plasma angiotensin II and decreased atrial natriuretic peptide in a dose-dependent manner. Our results demonstrate that compared with furosemide, torasemide treatment significantly improved survival rate, LV function and ameliorated the progression of cardiac remodeling in rats with CHF after EAM.     

新型袢利尿剂托拉塞米治疗心衰进展

组织水肿是心衰发生、发展过程中的重要环节,袢利尿剂的应用是心衰治疗的重要组成部分.托拉塞米是一种新型的吡啶磺酰脲类袢利尿剂.近十余年的研究证实,托拉塞米在心衰的治疗方面有良好的作用:利尿作用更强、生物利用度更高、半衰期更长、作用更持久;对电解质、血糖、血脂代谢均无影响;主要在肝脏代谢.因此,对肾脏功能不全者不会产生蓄积,可以长期使用.本文就新型袢利尿剂托拉塞米治疗心衰的研究作一综述.     

An orally active adenosine A1 receptor antagonist,FK838, increases renal excretion and maintains glomerular filtration rate in furosemide-resistant rats

1. Loop and thiazide diuretics are common therapeutic agents for the treatment of sodium retention and oedema. However, resistance to diuretics and decreases in renal function can develop during diuretic therapy. Adenosine causes renal vasoconstriction, sodium reabsorption, and participates in the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism for the regulation of glomerular filtration rate. 2. We tested the hypothesis that the selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist FK838 is orally active and causes diuresis and natriuresis, but maintains glomerular filtration rate in normal rats or in rats with furosemide resistance. 3. In normal male Sprague - Dawley rats, FK838 dose-dependently increased urine flow and sodium and chloride excretion while sparing potassium. In combination with furosemide, FK838 enhanced the diuretic and natriuretic actions of furosemide to the same extent as hydrochlorothiazide and did not increase the potassium loss in normal rats. In furosemide-resistant rats, FK838 increased urine flow and electrolyte excretion to a greater extent than hydrochlorothiazide. In addition, hydrochlorothiazide significantly decreased glomerular filtration rate, whereas FK838 maintained glomerular filtration rate in furosemide-resistant rats. 4. This study shows that the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist FK838 is orally active and causes potent diuresis and natriuresis and maintains glomerular filtration rate in normal or furosemide-resistant rats. Adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists may be novel therapeutics for the treatment of oedema in normal or otherwise diuretic-resistant patients.     

A new diuretic that does not reduce renal handling of uric acid in rats, S-8666

The uric acid-retaining effects of diuretics were studied using sodium-restricted spontaneously hypertensive rats. Test agents were administered orally once a day for two weeks. Diuretic thiazides such as trichlormethiazide and hydrochlorothiazide and loop diuretics such as furosemide and indacrinone clearly reduced the renal function for uric acid excretion in treatment which produced major effects such as diuresis, saluresis and hypotension. However, a new diuretic with uricosuric activity, S-8666, developed in our laboratories, had no effect on the renal handling of uric acid at doses which showed major effects similar to those of other diuretics. The results should aid the understanding of the utility of S-8666 as a new diuretic antihypertensive which does not cause hyperuricemia during therapy.     

Renal effects of torasemide in the rat. Clearance and micropuncture studies

The effects of torasemide on renal glomerular and tubular functions were studied in rats using clearance and micropuncture techniques. A dose-response relationship of torasemide in the range of 0.2-20 mg/kg b.w. on the increase of urine volume, urinary sodium and potassium excretion was established. The effect of a dose of 0.2 mg/kg b.w. torasemide was completely abolished by preinjection of 10 mg/kg probenecid, whereas the effects of higher doses remained unchanged. Torasemide had no significant effect on glomerular filtration rate. Proximal fractional reabsorption was not influenced. A remarkable depression of fluid and electrolyte reabsorption, however, occurred in the loop of Henle after torasemide under free flow conditions, as well as in functionally isolated microperfused loops of Henle. No further inhibition of fluid and electrolyte reabsorption between the early distal convoluted tubules and the final urine could be detected. In contrast, a compensatory increase of reabsorption was observed in this part of the nephron. The activity of the tubuloglomerular feedback system was completely and reversibly blocked by torasemide. Torasemide did not differ from other typical loop diuretics with respect to the different renal actions studied here.     

Torasemide, a long-acting loop diuretic, reduces the progression of myocarditis to dilated cardiomyopathy

Torasemide is a long-acting loop diuretic that combines the effects of both furosemide and spironolactone. It has been reported that torasemide may block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and therefore it might attenuate myocardial remodeling accompanied by left ventricular dysfunction. However, nothing is known about the effect of torasemide on myocardial remodeling in a rat model in which myosin-induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis might develop into dilated cardiomyopathy. Experimental autoimmune myocarditis was elicited in Lewis rats by immunization with porcine cardiac myosin. Twenty-eight days after immunization, we investigated the effects of torasemide on metabolic and neurohumoral parameters, cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in experimental autoimmune myocarditis rats. Diuresis was increased dose-dependently by torasemide; the urinary potassium and sodium excretion was significantly decreased and increased, respectively. Myocardial functional parameters measured by hemodynamic and echocardiographic studies were significantly improved by torasemide treatment in a dose-dependent manner. The area of fibrosis, myocyte size and the myocardial protein levels of transforming growth factor-beta1, collagen III, and aldosterone synthase were significantly decreased, and the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase2 protein level was significantly increased by torasemide treatment. Moreover, the plasma levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone were increased and atrial natriuretic peptide was decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Our results indicate that torasemide treatment significantly improved left ventricular function and ameliorated the progression of cardiac remodeling beyond its renal effects in rats with chronic heart failure after experimental autoimmune myocarditis.     

Interaction of the diuretics torasemide and U-37883A with the KATP channel in rat isolated aorta

In this study we have investigated the interaction of the loop diuretics torasemide and furosemide and of the eukalemic diuretic U-37883A (4-morpholinocarboximidine-N–1-adamantyl-N’-cyclohexylhydrochloride) with the ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel (K_ATP channel) in rat aortic rings. Torasemide contains a sulphonylurea group which might enable the compound to interfere with K_ATP channels; this group is lacking in furosemide. U-37883A blocks several types of K_ATP channels. The interaction with the vascular K_ATP channel was probed in binding studies, ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux experiments and vasorelaxation assays. Torasemide inhibited the binding of the K_ATP channel inhibitor [³H]glibenclamide and of the opener [³H]P1075 with IC₅₀ values of 19 and 45 μM, respectively; furosemide and U-37883A were inactive or interfered with binding in a nonspecific way. In ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux experiments, the loop diuretics, at μM concentrations, inhibited basal tracer efflux to 50% whereas U-37883A had no effect. P1075-stimulated ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux, a qualitative measure of K_ATP channel opening, was inhibited by U-37883A and torasemide with IC₅₀ values of 0.06 and 130 μM, respectively; furosemide induced only a small (23%) inhibition. In experiments measuring isometric force, torasemide and furosemide partially relaxed endothelium-denuded aortic rings precontracted with noradrenaline or KCl with EC₅₀ values between 6 and 10 μM. The vasorelaxant effect of P1075 was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner by torasemide (300 μM) but unaffected by furosemide. U-37883A increased noradrenaline-induced force and inhibited the vasorelaxant effect of P1075 in an apparently competitive manner with an inhibition constant of 0.4 μM. The data show that torasemide interferes specifically with the binding of the K_ATP channel modulators [³H]glibenclamide and [³H]P1075 and with the K_ATP channel opening and vasorelaxant effects of P1075 whereas furosemide is inactive. This suggests that the interaction of torasemide with the vascular K_ATP channel is due to the sulphonylurea group present in torasemide. U-37883A, which does not inhibit P1075 binding, is one of the most potent blockers of P1075-induced ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux yet described but is relatively weak as an inhibitor of P1075-mediated vasorelaxation. The opposite vascular actions of torasemide and U-37883A are expected to contribute to the renal effects of these drugs. Received: 28 January 1998 / Accepted: 20 April 1998     

An examination of the site and mechanism of action of torasemide in man

Acute clearance studies were performed in normal subjects to determine the site and mechanism of action of torasemide (isopropyl-1-methyl-3 phenylamino-4 pyridil-3 sulphonyl-3-urea), a new diuretic agent, in the human kidney. The drug caused no change in glomerular filtration rate or effective renal plasma flow. Sodium excretion rose to 16% of filtered load, whereas there was a chloriuresis of 23%. During maximal water diuresis, the drug caused an increase in urine flow rate and a decrease in solute-free water clearance. Administration of the drug during hypertonic saline infusion into hydropenic subjects resulted in a marked decrease in water reabsorption from the collecting duct. Torasemide caused no change in phosphate excretion or in the percentage of filtered bicarbonate excreted, nor was urinary pH or net hydrogen ion excretion affected by the drug. The data suggest that the primary site of action of torasemide is the medullary portion of the ascending limb of the loop of Henle.