Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive surgical candidates (20 men, 13 women; 39-81 years old) were included. MR imaging comprised fast spin-echo (TR/TE 4000/91), fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo (500/15), and T1-weighted breath-hold gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (100/4; flip angle, 80 degrees) images before and after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Helical CT used 5-mm collimation with a pitch of 1:1.5-1.7; images were obtained 20 and 65-70 sec after injection of 150 ml of contrast material. Two pairs of interpreters who were unaware of the results of the other imaging method independently scored each examination for the presence of a lesion and for surgical resectability using a five-point scale. Results were correlated with surgery (n = 25) or consensus review (n = 8). Receiver operating characteristic methodology was used to analyze the results for resectability, and positive predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: Both MR imaging and helical CT revealed 29 of 31 lesions. In determining lesion resectability, the mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.96 and 0.81 (p = .01) and the positive predictive values were 86.5% and 76% (p = .02) for MR imaging and helical CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and helical CT performed equally well in lesion detection. MR imaging was significantly better in the assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumors.     

Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and dual-phase computed tomography (CT) in the depiction of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one hepatic resection candidates with known colorectal metastases were examined. MR imaging comprised fast spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted imaging, T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) fast low-angle shot imaging before SPIO enhancement, dual-echo SE imaging, T2-weighted fast low-angle shot imaging, and T1-weighted GRE imaging after SPIO enhancement. CT was performed with 8-mm collimation and 1:1 pitch; imaging commenced 20 seconds and 65-70 seconds after injection of 150 mL of contrast medium. All images were reviewed independently by four blinded observers. The alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to analyze the results, which were correlated with findings from surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography, and histopathologic studies in 31 patients and with consensus review together with all other imaging and clinical follow-up in 20 patients. Sensitivities were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity of MR was significantly higher than that of CT (p < .02): 79.8% for MR and 75.3% for CT for all lesions, and 80.6% for MR and 73.5% for CT for malignant lesions. The mean areas under the alternative-free response ROC curves were 0.83 for MR and 0.78 for CT (difference not significant). CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than dual-phase CT in the depiction of colorectal metastases.     

MRI与多层螺旋CT动态增强检测小肝细胞癌:受试者特性曲线分析

目的比较多层螺旋CT(MDCT)与MRI动态增强扫描对患有慢性肝病及肝硬化患者中对小肝细胞癌(SHCC)检出的敏感性,评价不同影像技术的临床价值。方法37例纳入研究组,其中24例明确诊断SHCC,共43个病灶;MDCT快流率注射对比剂碘海醇后行多期扫描;MRI采用SE序列加快速扰相梯度回波序列(FMPSPGR),行钆喷替酸葡甲胺(Gd-DTPA)增强后动态扫描。对结果行受试者特性(ROC)曲线分析并统计检出敏感性。结果分析ROC曲线,MDCT快速注射对比剂后多期扫描对SHCC的诊断效率高于MR动态扫描,但曲线下面积Az值,两种方法间差异无统计学意义(P>0·05)。对瘤径≤1cm的微小肝癌(MHCC)检出敏感性,MDCT和MRI分别为90·0%、95·0%和70·0%、85·0%;对SHCC的阳性预测值MDCT增强后多期扫描略高于MR动态增强扫描,分别为97·5%、97·6%和90·7%、94·7%。结论对于慢性肝病及肝硬化病人的随访,建议采用MDCT增强后多期扫描,为及早发现SHCC或MHCC及早期治疗提供帮助。     

Detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for surgery: comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of phased array MR imaging of the liver at 1.5 T with and without ferumoxides with dual-phase helical CT for the detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for hepatic surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with known or suspected hepatic lesions who were eligible for surgery underwent dual-phase helical CT at 20 and 70 sec after the start of contrast material injection and phased array MR imaging using fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging before and after ferumoxides infusion of 0.56 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight. Three observers who were unaware of the surgical findings separately reviewed the CT scans and unenhanced and enhanced MR images of 24 patients who completed the protocol. The observers' findings were compared with results obtained at surgery using intraoperative sonography and having histopathologic confirmation. Statistical analysis was performed using a segment-by-segment analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two lesions were found at surgery. The sensitivity of CT, unenhanced MR imaging, and enhanced MR imaging for blinded observers was 60.4%, 62.0%, and 68.2%, respectively. The specificity was 89.2%, 81.9%, and 81.6%, respectively. Five lesions in three patients were not detected preoperatively using any of the techniques. MR imaging found additional lesions not detected on CT in four patients; CT detected one additional lesion not seen on MR imaging. CONCLUSION: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging of the liver shows a trend toward increased sensitivity compared with dual-phase helical CT. Specificity of helical CT was superior to that of enhanced MR imaging for most observers.     

Surgically staged focal liver lesions: accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical CT for detection and characterization

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical computed tomography (CT) in enabling preoperative detection and characterization of surgically staged focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgically and histopathologically proven liver lesions were evaluated by three experienced CT readers. These lesions were present in 77 patients who underwent dual-phase helical CT. Images were interpreted separately by the three blinded reviewers. Each lesion was graded on a nine-point scale of confidence, with 1 being definitely benign, 9 being definitely malignant, and 5 being indeterminate. The chi2 test was used to determine if the distribution of lesion classifications was different between readers. RESULTS: There was a total of 237 lesions: 73 were benign and 164 were malignant. Sensitivity for lesion detection was 69%, 70%, and 71% for the three reviewers, respectively. Specificity was 91%, 86%, and 90%, and the area under the curve for the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively. The difference in the distributions of lesion classification between the three reviewers was not statistically significant (P =.67) as determined by chi2 analysis. CONCLUSION: Dual-phase CT has sensitivity of 69%-71% and high specificity (86%-91%) in enabling the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Interpretation is highly reproducible, as there is minimal variation between experienced reviewers.     

Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P greater than or equal to .01), however, was found between these two techniques.     

An anthropomorphic phantom for receiver operating characteristic studies in CT imaging of liver lesions.

The purpose of the study was to develop a methodology that allowed quantitative assessment of image quality in CT and its relationship to dose. An anthropomorphic phantom was designed for use in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies of the detectability of liver lesions with CT. The lesions were simulated by different mixtures of glycerol and water that were filled into holes of different diameters in a liver tissue substitute. A pilot study was carried out on five different scanners that were operated at various exposure settings. A positive correlation was demonstrated for each of the scanners between the weighted CT dose index (CTDIW) and the area under the ROC curve. For the exposure settings used in the clinical routine in the five laboratories, the CTDIW ranged from 15 to 31 mGy. Three observers who read the corresponding set of five phantom images agreed, as judged from the areas under the ROC curves, that there was a marked difference in quality between the three best images and the other two. The two newest scanners in the study had the lowest CTDIW, and at the same time the best ROC results. The phantom and the ROC methodology may, with a set of suggested improvements, be used for comparison of the performance in different CT laboratories, and to establish the dose needed to ensure adequate image quality for a particular scanner.     

Value of contrast-enhanced sonography for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease: receiver operating characteristic analysis

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced agent detection sonographic imaging to characterize focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease in comparison with baseline sonographic images and to determine whether agent detection imaging can reduce the necessity of further diagnostic workup for lesion characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced sonography using 4 g of Levovist at a concentration of 300 mg/mL was performed on 75 focal hepatic lesions in 75 patients with diffuse liver disease. Interval reviews for both baseline without and with contrast-enhanced sonography were performed independently by two radiologists. They were requested to determine the malignity of focal hepatic lesions using a 5-point confidence level and to record the specific diagnoses and the necessity for further imaging for lesion characterization. Radiologists' performances for lesion differentiation using baseline and contrast-enhanced sonography were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Interobserver agreement was also analyzed. RESULTS: When contrast-enhanced sonography was used, ROC analysis revealed a significant improvement for both reviewers (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)] = 0.753 and 0.830 and 0.971 and 0.974 at baseline sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography, respectively; p < 0.002) for differentiating malignant and benign focal liver lesions. Contrast-enhanced sonography also improved specificity from 12% to 91% for reviewer 1 and from 26% to 85% for reviewer 2 compared with baseline sonography. Furthermore, excellent interobserver agreement was achieved for contrast-enhanced sonography (weighted kappa = 0.919), whereas only good agreement was achieved for baseline sonography (weighted kappa = 0.656). A better result for specific diagnosis was obtained by contrast-enhanced sonography (79% and 75%) than by baseline sonography (37% and 48%, p < 0.05). Contrast-enhanced sonography (72% and 63%) outperformed baseline sonography (35% and 28%, p < 0.05) as a confirmatory imaging technique. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced agent detection sonography can be used to characterize focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease reliably and with a higher diagnostic confidence than baseline sonography. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the need for further diagnostic workups for focal hepatic lesion characterization.     

Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement

The purpose of this study was to compare dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using dynamic gadolinium enhancement for liver lesion detection and characterization. Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent dual-phase spiral CT and MRI for the evaluation of focal liver disease within a 1-month period. Spiral CT and MR images were interpreted prospectively, in a blinded fashion by separate, individual, experienced investigators, to determine lesion detection and characterization. Liver lesions were confirmed by surgery and pathology in 6 patients, and by clinical and imaging follow-up in the other 16 patients. Pathological correlation of a primary extrahepatic malignancy was available in 5 of the 16 patients who had metastatic liver disease. Spiral CT and MRI detected 53 and 63 lesions, and characterized 39 and 62 true positive lesions, respectively. A kappa statistic test was applied to assess agreement between MR and CT results. MR versus CT for lesion detection resulted in a kappa statistic of 0.54 (95% confidence interval), indicating moderate agreement, and 0.32 (95% confidence interval) for lesion characterization, indicating only slight agreement. More lesions were detected on MR images than CT images in 6 (27%) patients, with lesions detected only on MR images in 4 (18%) patients. More lesions were characterized on MR images in 9 (41%) patients. In 9 patients with a discrepancy between MR and CT findings, the MR images added information considered significant to patient management in all 9 cases. MRI was moderately superior to dual-phase spiral CT for lesion detection, and was markedly superior for lesion characterization, with these differences having clinical significance.     

Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Several statistical methods have been developed for analyzing multireader, multicase (MRMC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies. The objective of this article is to increase awareness of these methods and determine if their results are concordant for published datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from three previously published studies were reanalyzed using five MRMC methods. For each method the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean of the readers' ROC areas for each diagnostic test, the P value for the comparison of the diagnostic tests' mean accuracies, and the 95% CIs for the mean difference in ROC areas of the diagnostic tests were reported. RESULTS: Important differences in P values and CIs were seen when using parametric versus nonparametric estimates of accuracy, and there were the expected differences for random-reader versus fixed-reader models. Controlling for these differences, the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM), Obuchowski-Rockette, Beiden-Wagner-Campbell, and Song's multivariate Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) methods gave almost identical results for the fixed-reader model. For the random-reader model, the DBM, Obuchowski-Rockette, and Beiden-Wagner-Campbell methods yielded approximately the same inferences, but the CIs for the Beiden-Wagner-Campbell method tend to be broader. Ishwaran's hierarchical ROC sometimes yielded significance not found with other methods. Song's modification of DBM's jack-knifing algorithm sometimes led to different conclusions than the original DBM algorithm. CONCLUSION: In choosing and applying MRMC methods, it is important to recognize: (1) the distinction between random-reader and fixed-reader models, the uncertainties accounted for by each, and thus the level of generalizeability expected from each; (2) assumptions made by the various MRMC methods; and (3) limitations of a five- or six-reader study when the reader variability is great.     

Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare accuracy of dynamic contrast material-enhanced thin-section multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional (3D) dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging with optimized gradient-echo (GRE) sequence for depiction of hepatic lesions; surgery and histologic analysis were the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval was granted, and written informed consent was obtained. Fifty-eight patients (45 men, 13 women; age range, 47-82 years) with hepatic metastases were imaged with multi-detector row CT (3.2-mm section thickness), 3D dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (2.5-mm effective section thickness), and SPIO-enhanced MR by using an optimized T2-weighted GRE sequence. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who identified and localized lesions with a four-point confidence scale. Accuracy of each technique was measured with alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results were correlated with findings at surgery with intraoperative ultrasonography or histopathologic examination. Statistical differences among techniques for each observer were measured. RESULTS: Accuracy values for each observer for all metastases (n = 215) and 1.0-cm or smaller metastases (n = 80), respectively, follow: For CT, those for reader 1 were 0.82 and 0.65; for reader 2, 0.81 and 0.68. For gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.79; for reader 2, 0.90 and 0.76. For SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.83; for reader 2, 0.92 and 0.81. For all metastases for both observers, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were significantly more accurate than CT (P < .01). For metastases 1.0 cm or smaller and one observer, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were more accurate than CT (P < .01); for the other observer, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was more accurate than gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (P < .05) and CT (P < .02), but there was no significant difference between gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and CT (P = .2). CONCLUSION: Accuracy for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was similar. Both techniques were significantly more accurate than CT.     

Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging surpasses dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) in differentiating focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-five patients who had or were suspected of having focal liver lesions were included in a multicenter study and underwent dual-phase spiral CT and enhanced MR imaging. Image interpretations performed by independent experienced radiologists were compared with the final diagnosis that was based on all available clinical information (including histopathologic findings in 77 patients) and that was determined with consensus. Differences in classifications by using either enhanced MR imaging or dual-phase spiral CT were analyzed with the McNemar test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic performance of enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase spiral CT. RESULTS: Lesion classification was correct in 108 (74%) patients with enhanced MR imaging and in 83 (57%) with dual-phase spiral CT (P =.001). Lesions were correctly classified as either malignant or benign in 123 (85%) patients with enhanced MR imaging and in 98 (68%) with dual-phase spiral CT (P =.001). Classification of lesions as either hepatocellular or nonhepatocellular was correct in 130 (90%) patients with enhanced MR imaging and in 93 (64%) with dual-phase spiral CT (P =.001). These differences remained when analyses were restricted to histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. Comparison of the ROC curves illustrated that enhanced MR imaging performance surpassed that of dual-phase spiral CT. CONCLUSION: Mn-DPDP-enhanced MR imaging is superior to dual-phase spiral CT in classification of focal liver lesions.     

Parathyroid lesions: characterization with dual-phase arterial and venous enhanced CT of the neck

This clinical report describes the enhancement characteristics of hypersecreting parathyroid lesions on dual-phase neck CT. We retrospectively analyzed the enhancement characteristics of 5 pathologically confirmed PTH-secreting lesions on dual-phase CT examinations. Attenuation values were measured for PTH-secreting lesions, vascular structures (CCA and IJV), and soft tissue structures (thyroid gland, jugulodigastric lymph node, and submandibular gland). From the attenuation values, "relative enhancement washout percentage" and "tissue-vascular ratio" were calculated and compared. All lesions decreased in attenuation from arterial to venous phase, while the mean attenuation values of other soft tissue structures increased. A high relative enhancement washout percentage was correlated with parathyroid lesions (P < .006). The tissue-CCA ratio and tissue-IJV ratio for PTH-secreting lesions in the arterial phase were statistically significantly higher compared with soft tissue structures (P < .05). If these results are validated in future larger studies, noncontrast and delayed venous phases of 4D-CT could be eliminated to markedly reduce radiation exposure.