What is the value of axillary dissection or sentinel node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND: Some surgeons have advocated sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The value of the information obtained is not clear. METHODS: From 1972 to 2005, 564 selected patients with pure DCIS had axillary staging with either SNB or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Data were collected in a prospective database. RESULTS: Only 2 of 564 patients had positive nodes by hematoxylin and eosin, and they were both in the ALND group. Both patients had mastectomies, were upstaged, received chemotherapy, and survived for more than 10 years without local or distant recurrence. Among 171 patients who had SNB, 10 had isolated tumor cells found by immunohistochemistry. Two patients who underwent SNB had local recurrence, neither developed distant or regional recurrence. Six of 564 patients in the ALND group developed local invasive recurrence and died of metastatic breast cancer, but none of them had positive nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Information from lymph node examination in DCIS patients failed to predict poor outcome. SNB is useful for DCIS in mastectomy, especially with immediate reconstruction. It may be indicated for DCIS at high risk for upgrading to invasive cancer on final excision, but reliable criteria for identifying these tumors are not yet available.     

美国临床肿瘤学会《早期乳腺癌病人前哨淋巴结活检指南》更新介绍与解读

2014年4月,临床肿瘤学杂志（Journal of Clinical Oncology,JCO）上发表了美国临床肿瘤学会（American Society of Clinical Oncology,ASCO）关于早期乳腺癌病人应用前哨淋巴结活检（sentinel node biopsy,SNB）的若干新推荐。这是继2005年该学会首次推荐《早期乳腺癌病人前哨淋巴结活检指南》后的第一次更新。基于随机临床试验（RCT）证据,该项指南提出3条推荐：（1）无前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node,SLN）转移的女性病人不必接受腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection, ALND）;（2）大多数伴有1~2个SLN转移,且计划接受保乳术及术后全乳放疗者无需行ALND;（3）有SLN转移并行全乳切除术者应接受ALND。基于队列研究和（或）非正式共识,更新两组推荐：（1）可手术的多中心肿瘤的乳腺癌病人、将行乳房切除术的导管原位癌（ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS）病人、之前接受过乳腺和（或）腋窝手术的以及接受术前或新辅助系统治疗的病人,可以行SNB;（2）对瘤体较大或局部晚期浸润性乳腺癌（肿瘤大小T3/T4）、炎性乳腺癌、拟接受保乳治疗的DCIS以及孕期妇女,不适于行SNB。     

�����ٴ�����ѧ�ᡶ�������ٰ�����ǰ���ܰͽ���ָ�ϡ����½�������

??Express and interpretation on American society of clinical oncology guideline update for Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer WU Ke-jin.
Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract 2014 April, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) issued new clinical practice guideline on sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer in Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). This guideline update reflects some changes since the 2005 guideline. Based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), there are three recommendations: (1) Women without sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases should not accept axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). (2) In most cases, Women with 1-2 metastatic SLNs going to undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with whole-breast radiotherapy should not adopt ALND. (3) Women with SLN metastases planning to receive mastectomy should be provided ALND. Based on cohort studies and/or informal consensus, there are two prime recommendations. (1) Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be offered to those women with operable breast cancer and multicentric tumors, with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) planning to undergo mastectomy, who previously got breast and/or axillary surgery or who accepted preoperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy. (2) SNB should not be offered to those women with large or locally advanced invasive breast cancer (tumor size T3/T4), inflammatory breast cancer, or DCIS will undergo BCS, or are pregnant.     

Are the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Findings Being Applied to Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

In 2010, the ACOSOG Z0011 trial showed equivalent survival and recurrence between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for those with a tumor positive sentinel node (SN). We examined national trends in axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for clinically node positive disease in the years prior to and after the Z0011 trial publication. 12,063 women with cT1‐4N1M0 invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC from 2006 to 2013 and had 1‐3 positive nodes on pathology were selected from the National Cancer Data Base. We defined SLNB as 1–4 nodes and ALND as ≥10 nodes examined. 2,704 women (22.4%) underwent SLNB alone and 9,359 (77.6%) underwent ALND. The rate of SLNB increased from 25.6% in 2006 to 33.3% in 2012 in patients that underwent lumpectomy (p < 0.01) and increased from 20.6% to 22.8% in patients that underwent mastectomy (p = 0.25). Patients treated at Community centers (30.4% versus 19.2% at Academic centers) and those with less positive nodes (32.2% for 1 positive node versus 10.1% for 3 positive nodes, p < 0.01) were more likely to have SLNB alone compared to ALND. On multivariate analysis, treatment with lumpectomy (OR 1.46, CI 1.28–1.67), lower number of positive nodes (OR 3.98, CI 3.29–4.82) and lobular subtype (OR 1.82, CI 1.42–2.34) were independent predictors of receiving SLNB alone after NAC. Approximately 22% of patients with cN1 breast cancer underwent SLNB alone for pN1 disease after NAC. Ongoing clinical trials will determine if recurrence and survival rates are equivalent between SLNB and ALND groups.     

Lymphatic mapping improves staging and reduces morbidity in women undergoing total mastectomy for breast carcinoma

Lymphatic mapping (LM) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have become widely accepted in the setting of breast conservation surgery. We hypothesized that LM can be extended to women undergoing total mastectomy, being technically feasible, yielding highly accurate and sensitive results, improving axillary staging, and reducing postoperative morbidity. Between 1995 and 2003, 99 women (mean age 59 years, range 34-87) underwent 100 mastectomies with LM using blue dye alone. Fifty-nine operations (60%) were followed by a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Ninety per cent of patients had invasive carcinoma; 10 per cent had in situ carcinoma. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range 0.3-8 cm). One hundred fifty-nine sentinel nodes (SNs) (mean 1.65, range 1-5) were successfully identified in 96 (96%) axillae. Twenty-five (25%) sentinel nodes revealed nodal metastases. Five of 25 (20%) SNs had micrometasteses. Three patients had a false-negative SN, yielding a sensitivity of 91 per cent. The accuracy of LM was 97 per cent. No patient who underwent SLNB alone developed lymphedema, axillary seroma formation, infection, or restricted arm movement. This was contrasted with patients undergoing ALND, where 10 (16%) developed lymphedema and 2 (3%) developed an infection. Ten (25%) patients developed axillary paresthesias after SNB compared with 47 (78%) patients after ALND (P < 0.0001). LM in the setting of mastectomy is accurate and sensitive. This technique improves axillary staging and decreases morbidity. Patients who are not candidates for breast conservation should be offered LM and SLNB at the time of mastectomy.     

Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast ductal carcinoma in situ upstaged to invasive carcinoma

Abstract:  The role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still a dilemma. Different studies are trying to define predicting factors of invasive cancer in DCIS. The aim of this study was to confirm the value of SLN biopsy in DCIS because of the invasive upstaging risk on final histology. Patients with initial diagnosis of DCIS and with axillary SLN biopsy were selected. All diagnoses were confirmed by biopsy of mammographic lesions. Surgical treatment was lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with SLN biopsy. Imprint stains were performed, and then serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and with immunohistochemistry (IHC). A complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed during the same surgery when a node metastasis was found. Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. Of the 61 patients who were initially diagnosed with DCIS, 12 (20%) were upstaged to microinvasive or invasive carcinoma and 9 (15%) had a metastatic SLN. Patients upstaged to invasive carcinoma had macrometastatic SLN immediately fed by a complete ALND. SLN micrometastases and isolated cells were detected by IHC and secondary complete ALND found an additional metastatic lymph node in one patient. Tumor size larger than 30 mm and mastectomy were the only significative predicting factors of upstaged disease (p < 0.0001) in our study. In patients with initial diagnosis of large DCIS programmed for mastectomy, SLN biopsy should be discussed in order to detect underlying invasive disease and to spare patients a second operating time.     

Outcome of Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Sentinel Node Biopsy

Background

In sentinel node biopsy (SNB), tumor-positive findings, mainly micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITC) have been found in up to 8%?C16% of patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or microinvasive DCIS (DCISM). The prognostic significance of such findings is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the outcome of DCIS and DCISM patients with SNB.

Methods

A total of 280 breast cancer patients with pure or microinvasive DCIS underwent SNB between April 2001 and December 2010 at the Breast Surgery Unit of Helsinki University Central Hospital. Patient, tumor, SNB procedure, and follow-up data were gathered. The median follow-up was 50?months (range 7?C123?months).

Results

Altogether, 21 patients had tumor-positive sentinel node findings. Of these, 14 were in pure DCIS patients (1 macrometastasis, 1 micrometastasis, 12 ITC) and 7 in DCISM patients (1 macrometastasis, 2 micrometastases, 4 ITC). Also, 16 patients, 10 with pure DCIS and 6 with DCISM, underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Only 1 of them, a patient with DCISM, had additional tumor positive finding in the ALND. During a median follow-up of 50?months (range 7?C123?months) there were 5 local recurrences. One patient with pure DCIS and tumor-negative SNB developed overt axillary metastases and later also distant metastases.

Conclusions

DCIS and DCISM patients do have tumor positive findings, but a majority of these are ITC or micrometastases. In light of this study, these findings do not affect the outcome of DCIS or DCISM patients.     

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ Treated by Mastectomy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer. Its role in ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with the subsequent diagnosis of invasive disease and to determine the role of SLNB when performing a mastectomy for DCIS. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of all mastectomies performed on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2005 at a single tertiary-care institution. Results Ninety mastectomies for DCIS were included, 54 (60%) of which were performed with concurrent SLNB. Of 44 patients diagnosed preoperatively with DCIS by core biopsy only, 34 patients (63%) had a concurrent SLNB, while 10 patients (28%) were treated with mastectomy alone (P < .01). Overall, 30 patients (33%) had invasive disease, 22 of whom received concurrent SLNB. Seven SLNB patients (13%) had positive SLNs. On univariate analysis, multifocality (P = .03), multicentricity (P = .01), comedonecrosis (P = .01), and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .001) were associated with invasive disease on pathology. On multivariate analysis, comedonecrosis (P = .04) and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .01) were independent predictors for invasion. There was no statistically significant predictor for sentinel lymph node metastasis. Conclusions Approximately one-third of patients with DCIS treated with mastectomy at our institution later had invasive disease, and factors associated with invasion have been identified. On the basis of our results, routine SLNB is recommended in this patient population.     

Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB): Results of a Nationwide Registration Study

Background

Knowledge of regional lymph node involvement is important in patients with recurrent breast cancer for obtaining better locoregional control and predicting prognosis. To determine technical feasibility, validity, aberrant drainage rates, and clinical consequences of performing repeat sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer we conducted the “Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB)” study.

Methods

A total of 150 patients with locally recurrent breast cancer underwent lymphatic mapping and SNB. In case of an intact axillary lymph node basin, ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed subsequently.

Results

A total of 41 patients previously underwent breast conserving therapy (BCT) with SNB, 82 patients BCT with ALND, and 21 patients a mastectomy, of which 9 with SNB and 12 with ALND. In 95 patients (63.3 %) a sentinel node was identified and in 78 patients (52 %) the sentinel node was successfully removed. In 18 patients (22.8 %) a (micro)metastasis was found on pathologic examination. Confirmation ALND in 18 patients showed no axillary lymph node metastases. Aberrant drainage pathways were visualized in 58.9 % of the patients, significantly more frequently after a previous ALND (79.3 %) than after a previous SNB (25.0 %) (P < .0001). Overall, the result of this repeat SNB led to a change in the adjuvant treatment plan in 16.5 % of the patients with a successful repeat SNB.

Conclusions

Repeat SNB is technically feasible and provides reliable results in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer, leading to change in management in 1 of 6 patients.     

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Necessary in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Mastectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

The gain by performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) during prophylactic mastectomy (PM) is debatable, and we performed a meta‐analysis of existing literature to evaluate that the role of SLNB in subjects undergoing PM. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The search identified 11 relevant articles reporting on patients who underwent SLNB at the time of PM. Data were abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We included 14 studies comprising of 2,708 prophylactic mastectomies. Among 2,708 prophylactic mastectomies, the frequency of occult invasive cancer (51 cases) was 1.8% and the rate of positive SLNs (33 cases) was 1.2%. In 25 invasive cancers at the time of PM were found to have negative SLNs which avoided axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In seven cases with positive SLNBs were found not to have invasive cancer at the time of PM and needed a subsequent ALND. Most of the patients with positive SLNs had locally advanced disease in the contralateral breast. SLNB may be suitable for patients with ipsilateral, locally advanced breast cancer and is not recommend for all patients undergoing PM.     

Sentinel node procedure is warranted in ductal carcinoma in situ with high risk of occult invasive carcinoma and microinvasive carcinoma treated by mastectomy

Abstract:  Axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not warranted because DCIS has no metastatic potential. However, the risk of microinvasive carcinoma (MIC) exists in large DCIS treated by mastectomy. The aim of this series is to evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastases in DCIS and DCIS-MIC. We analyzed retrospectively patients treated in six French cancer centers for pure DCIS or DCIS-MIC. Surgical procedures were lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with an axillary sentinel node (SN) procedure. We included 161 patients suffering from pure DCIS (116/161, 72%) or DCIS-MIC (45/161, 28%). Mean age was 56 years (32–78). We observed underestimation between core biopsy and histological result in 43/142 cases (30%). These data show an association between lesion size, solid subtype, high-grade DCIS, and underestimation. Forty-eight breast conservative procedures were performed and 113 mastectomies (70%). SN procedure was performed using blue dye, technetium, or both. In our series, we selected patients with a high risk of occult invasive carcinoma: high grade (55%), mean size (27 mm), and mastectomy (112). Six SN were found positive (3.7%). In the five patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SN was the only positive node. SN in DCIS is an interesting procedure but not necessary for all patients. We need to focus on the subgroup with or a high risk of occult MIC: extensive calcifications or palpable mass, DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy and underestimation, multifocality, high grade, large tumor size, MIC, and mastectomy.     

The learning curve for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: practical considerations.

HYPOTHESIS: Performance of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) instead of full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) by inexperienced surgeons will lead to understaging of some women with breast cancer and increased costs. DESIGN: A decision analysis model was used to investigate the implications of SNB vs. full ALND during the learning phase (60-80 procedures). This model simulates a randomized trial of 10000 women in each arm. Data regarding the learning curve were obtained from published series. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of women with inaccurate staging of their breast cancer, overall survival, quality-adjusted survival, and potential costs of SNB vs ALND. RESULTS: Performance of SNB instead of ALND results in inability to locate a sentinel node in 38% of attempts during the learning phase (compared with 10% in later cases) and understaging in 12% of patients during the learning phase (compared with 0% in later cases). This understaging is associated with a small decrement in survival (1%-2%) and an increased risk of axillary recurrence. Sentinel node biopsy is cost-effective only when the ability to detect sentinel nodes exceeds 80%; and the cost of SNB is less than 50% of the cost of ALND. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure accurate staging of patients with breast cancer, all surgeons should perform full ALND while learning SNB techniques. Only after documentation of accuracy of SNB (sensitivity >90%) should full ALND be omitted for women with negative sentinel nodes.     

Re-evaluating the role of axillary lymph node dissection in screen-detected breast cancer patients

IntroductionThe American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG), Z0011 trial, demonstrated that there was no therapeutic benefit from completion lymphadenectomy in early stage breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node (SLN) biopsy. Patients with asymptomatic screen-detected tumors may represent a subgroup where completion axillary dissection with its attendant morbidities is unacceptable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ALND in an asymptomatic screen-detected breast cancer cohort.MethodsPatients were recruited from the national screening program which offers women (aged 50 to 65) biannual digital mammography. Over a 1 year period 519 screen-detected breast cancer patients were recruited of which 110 had a positive SLN.ResultsOf 519 patients in a national screening program that were clinically/radiologically identified as axillary node negative, 110 (21.2%) had a positive SLN. All 110 (T1 = 68, T2 = 42) patients proceeded to have an axillary clearance. 68 (59%) had T1 tumors and of these 40 (60%), despite a positive SLN, had no metastatic nodes on final pathological analysis of their axilla. In addition, 21 (50%) patients with T2 tumors had no metastatic nodes except for a positive SNB. Furthermore, only 6 (8.8%) of T1 tumors with a positive SLN had 4 or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes.Conclusion55.45% of patients with a screen-detected T1/T2 tumor had negative completion lymphadectomy. These findings compel us to re-evaluate the role of axillary dissection in the screen-detected asymptomatic breast cancer population to avoid unnecessary ALND with its attendant morbidities.     

Predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Accurate intraoperative diagnosis of axillary malignancy facilitates completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of initial surgery. The capability to address both the primary tumor and axillary disease in a single procedure offers several advantages. This study was designed to define the predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer and to evaluate the ability of the technique to facilitate accurate synchronous ALND. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients with breast cancer at an Army medical center underwent intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes concordant with initial excision. Those found to have sentinel nodes positive by touch preparation analysis underwent ALND at the initial procedure. Patients with negative sentinel nodes by touch preparation analysis, but positive by final pathology, underwent subsequent ALND. Results of the touch preparation analysis were compared with the final pathology. RESULTS: Over a 16-month period, 71 consecutive patients with breast cancer underwent initial excision and touch preparation analysis of 162 sentinel lymph nodes. Final pathology confirmed axillary metastasis in 32% (23 of 71) of patients. Of these, intraoperative touch preparation analysis identified 48% (11 of 23). There were no false positives or unnecessary axillary dissections based upon touch preparation results. Per sentinel node, the positive predictive value was 100%, the sensitivity was 47%, and the specificity was 100%. On a per patient basis, the positive predictive value was 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 48% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative touch preparation analysis is an effective adjunct to sentinel lymph node biopsy. In our series, it facilitated a definitive cancer operation at the time of initial surgery in nearly 50% of patients, and ensured that no patient underwent an unnecessary axillary dissection.     

Outcomes for Women With Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ and a Positive Sentinel Node: A Multi-Institutional Audit

Background A positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) has been reported in 6% to 13% of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although it is well established that nodal status for invasive disease is prognostically important, the clinical relevance of a positive SLN in patients with DCIS remains undetermined. Methods SLN biopsy was performed on 470 high-risk patients with DCIS (22% of all patients with DCIS) at 3 institutions. Of these, 43 (9%) had SLN metastases. Pathology findings of positive cases were reviewed, and follow-up was obtained. At 2 of the 3 institutions, data were also collected on DCIS patients who had negative findings on SLN biopsy. For these 414 patients, univariate analyses of tumor characteristics were performed to identify factors associated with node positivity. Results Extensive disease requiring mastectomy (p = 0.02) and the presence of necrosis (p = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of nodal positivity. Three (7%) of the 43 SLN-positive patients had macrometastases (pN1), 4 (9%) had micrometastases (pN1mi), and 36 (84%) had single tumor cells or small clusters (pN0(i+)). Of the 25 women that underwent completion axillary dissection, one was found to have a macrometastasis. On pathological review of the primary lesion, 2 (5%) of 43 patints were found to have microinvasion, and 2 (5%) lymphovascular invasion. Nine of 43 (21%) high-risk DCIS patients with a positive SLN and 9/470 (2%) of all high-risk DCIS patients were upstaged to AJCC stage I or II as a result of the SLN biopsy. At a median (range) follow-up of 27 (3–88) months, 1 patient had developed hepatic metastases. This patient had immunohistochemistry detected isolated tumor cells in her SLN (N0(i+)), and upon pathologic review, was found to have high-grade DCIS with microinvasion. Conclusion SLN biopsy for high-risk DCIS patients is a mean of detecting those who may have unrecognized invasive disease and therefore are at risk for distant disease.     

Is Routine Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Indicated in Women Undergoing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy? Magee-Womens Hospital Experience

INTRODUCTION: The routine use of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) at the time of prophylactic mastectomy remains controversial. This retrospective study was undertaken to determine if SLNB is justified in patients undergoing CPM. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 155 patients underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Eighty patients (51.6%) had SLNB performed at the time of CPM. The therapeutic mastectomy and the CPM specimens were evaluated for histopathology. Goldflam's classification was used to determine the risk of malignancy in the CPM specimens. RESULTS: Pathology in the therapeutic mastectomy specimens included 105 (68%) invasive carcinomas and 50 (32%) in-situ carcinomas. Multicentricity and/or multifocality were reported in 49.7%, and 70% were estrogen receptor positive. Two invasive breast cancers and three cases of DCIS were diagnosed in 155 CPM specimens (n = 5, 3.2%). The median number of SLN identified was 2 (range 1-6) from the CPM axilla. Two patients had positive SLNB for metastatic carcinoma (n = 2/80, 2.5%) with no primary tumor identified in the prophylactic mastectomy specimen. In both patients the therapeutic mastectomy was for recurrent invasive carcinoma in patients with a prior history of axillary node dissection. Occult carcinoma was found in five prophylactic mastectomy specimens: two invasive and three DCIS. Only 1 out of the 75 patients not undergoing SLNB at the time of their initial surgery would have required axillary staging for a previously undiagnosed invasive cancer in the CPM specimen on final pathology. Of all 155 patients undergoing CPM, only 4 (2.5%) had identified final pathologic findings where axillary staging with SLNB was beneficial. There was no evidence of arm lymphedema in any patient who had undergone CPM and SLNB at a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSION: Although SLNB is a minimally invasive method of axillary staging, this retrospective study does not support its routine use in patients undergoing CPM.     

Positive sentinel lymph node biopsy predicts the number of metastatic axillary nodes of breast cancer

It remains to be clarified whether a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes. This study examined a consecutive series of women with unilateral invasive breast cancer who underwent axillary lymph node dissection after an intra-operative positive SLNB. The numbers of positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were analyzed for a likelihood of pN1a, pN2a, and pN3a diseases as per the UICC TNM classification. Of the 368 study patients, 165 (45%) had one positive SLN and one or more negative SLNs. This result represented the most common combination of positive and negative SLNs. It was also the most predictive indicator (93%) of pN1a disease and the least predictive indicator (7% or 0%) of pN2a or pN3a disease, respectively. The numbers of positive and negative SLNs can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes in breast cancer patients.     

Is Sentinel Node Biopsy Necessary in Conservatively Treated DCIS?

Background We sought to identify the risk of axillary node involvement in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to determine whether axillary node assessment is necessary in these patients. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is replacing standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for surgical staging of invasive breast cancer. Its use in patients with DCIS versus local excision (LE), observation, and/or breast irradiation remains in question. Methods We examined the records of 813 patients with localized DCIS and disease-negative margins after LE who were randomly assigned to no further therapy or to breast irradiation in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B-17 and 1799 patients randomized to receive placebo or tamoxifen after LE + radiotherapy in NSABP trial B-24. An ALND was performed in 253 patients in NSABP B-17 and in 162 in NSABP B-24. Results We found that in NSABP trial B-17, seven patients developed ipsilateral nodal recurrence (INR). Overall INR rate was 0.83/1000 patient-years. In NSABP B-24, overall INR rate was 0.36/1000 patient-years. INR can be considered a surrogate for axillary involvement at the time of DCIS diagnosis. Conclusions INR in patients with DCIS treated conservatively is extremely rare. Our findings do not support the routine use of SNB in patients with conservatively treated, localized DCIS. Presented in part at the Society of Surgical Oncology meeting, March 2006.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer generally is accepted for its staging and prognostic value, but the extent of dissection remains controversial. Blind lymph node sampling or level I dissection may miss some nodal metastases, but ALND may result in lymphedema. In melanoma, intraoperative lymph node mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to ALND for identifying nodes containing metastases. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four mapping procedures were performed using a vital dye injected at the primary breast cancer site. Axillary lymphatics were identified and followed to the first ("sentinel") node, which was selectively excised before ALND. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 114 of 174 (65.5%) procedures and accurately predicted axillary nodal status in 109 of 114 (95.6%) cases. There was a definite learning curve, and all false-negative sentinel nodes occurred in the first part of the study; sentinel nodes identified in the last 87 procedures were 100% predictive. In 16 of 42 (38.0%) clinically negative/pathologically positive axillae, the sentinel node was the only tumor-involved lymph node identified. The anatomic location of the sentinel node was examined in the 54 most recent procedures; ten cases had only level II nodal metastases that could have been missed by sampling or low (level I) axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This experience indicates that intraoperative lymphatic mapping can accurately identify the sentinel node--i.e., the axillary lymph node most likely to contain breast cancer metastases--in some patients. The technique could enhance staging accuracy and, with further refinements and experience, might alter the role of ALND.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Window to Management of the Axilla

In patients with primary breast cancer, several large, randomized prospective trials have shown that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) substantially reduces the morbidity associated with axillary surgery compared with formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Moreover, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial has demonstrated that when the sentinel node reveals no evidence of metastatic disease, then no further ALND is required. Recently, the results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial have challenged the notion that all patients with metastases to the sentinel node require ALND. The results of this trial suggest that in selected sentinel node-positive patients, ALND can be potentially avoided. Yet, some concerns about the ACOSOG Z0011 trial have been raised, and these concerns may have implications in the widespread implementation of the results of this trial. Since the advent of the SNB technology, occult metastases within the sentinel node are frequently observed, and the significance of these findings remains controversial. Finally, this review considers special situations, such as pregnancy and the neoadjuvant setting, where the use of SNB should be applied judiciously. The SNB technology has dramatically improved the quality of life for women with breast cancer, and further modifications of its role in breast cancer treatment should be based on evidence obtained from randomized, controlled trials.