Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil for rectal cancer: a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the acute toxicity, pathologic response, relapse rates, and survival in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and either concurrent capecitabine or concurrent protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Between June 2001 and February 2004, 89 patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma were treated with preoperative RT and concurrent capecitabine, followed by mesorectal excision. These patients were individually matched by clinical T and N stage (as determined by endoscopic ultrasound and CT scans) with 89 control patients treated with preoperative RT and concurrent protracted infusion 5-FU between September 1997 and August 2002. RESULTS: In each group, 5 patients (6%) had Grade 3-4 toxicity during chemoradiotherapy. The pathologic complete response rate was 21% with capecitabine and 12% with protracted infusion 5-FU (p = 0.19). Of the 89 patients in the capecitabine group and 89 in the 5-FU group, 46 (52%) and 55 (62%), respectively, had downstaging of the T stage after chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.20). The estimated 3-year local control (p = 0.15), distant control (p = 0.86), and overall survival (p = 0.12) rate was 94.4%, 86.3%, and 89.8% for patients treated with capecitabine and 98.6%, 86.6%, and 96.4% for patients treated with protracted infusion 5-FU, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative concurrent capecitabine and concurrent protracted infusion 5-FU were both well tolerated, with similar, low rates of Grade 3-4 acute toxicity. No significant differences were seen in the pathologic response, local and distant recurrence, or overall survival among patients treated with preoperative RT and concurrent capecitabine compared with those treated with RT and concurrent protracted infusion 5-FU.     

Phase I-II trial of concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin with preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To identify the maximal tolerated dose level of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and to evaluate the efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal T3-T4 and/or N0-N+ rectal cancer received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday through Friday and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was increased in 5.0-Gy steps in cohorts of 3 patients starting from 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (dose level [DL] 1). DL2 and DL3 were designed to reach 42.5 Gy in 17 fractions and 47.5 Gy in 19 fractions, respectively. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at DL1 or DL2. Of the 3 patients treated at DL3, 1 presented with Grade 3 diarrhea, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, and 3 additional patients were added. Of the 6 patients treated at DL3, no new dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and DL3 was identified as the recommended dose in this study. Eight additional patients were treated at 47.5 Gy. Grade 2 proctitis was the most frequent adverse event (40%); Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients (10%). All patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients (85%) underwent R0 resection. Four patients (20%) presented with a histologic response of Grade 4, 11 (55%) with Grade 3+, 2 (15%) with Grade 3, and 2 patients (10%) with Grade 2. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose in this study was 47.5 Gy. The high rates of pathologic response of Grade 3+ and 4 must be confirmed through the accrual of new patients in the Phase II study.     

Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with irinotecan plus S-1 in locally advanced rectal cancer

Background and purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative radiation therapy combined with S-1 and irinotecan (SI) in LARC.

Materials and methods

Patients were considered LARC if they had a T3/T4 lesion or node positive. Weekly doses of 40 mg/m² irinotecan were intravenously administered once per week during weeks 1-5 of radiotherapy. S-1 (70 mg/m²) was given from Monday to Friday in all weeks of radiotherapy. 3-D conformal radiotherapy was given at daily fractions of 1.8 Gy for 5 days for a total dose of 50.4 (45 + 5.4) Gy. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks following the completion of chemoradiation.

Results

Between June 2006 and November 2007, 43 pts were enrolled. The stage was: cT3 24 patients, cT4 6 patients; 28 patients were cN+. Forty-one patients completed the chemoradiation and 42 patients underwent operation: a low anterior resection was performed in 36 patients, a total colectomy in 1 patient, and an abdominal perineal resection in 5 patients. T downstaging was observed in 50%; 23 N+ patients became N− (55%). The complete pathological response was observed in 9 patients (21%). The 3-year locoregional failure rate, distant failure rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 9.5%, 18.6%, 72.1%, and 94.3%, respectively. Only three patients experienced G3 diarrhea; one had G3 sepsis and two had septic shock. Hematological toxicity (G3-G4) was observed in five patients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative CRT with S-1 and irinotecan with 21% of complete response. However, prompt recognition and management of infection is needed to use it in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Optimal time interval between capecitabine intake and radiotherapy in preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and its metabolites reach peak plasma concentrations 1 to 2 hours after a single oral administration, and concentrations rapidly decrease thereafter. We performed a retrospective analysis to find the optimal time interval between capecitabine administration and radiotherapy for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The time interval between capecitabine intake and radiotherapy was measured in patients who were treated with preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine for rectal cancer. Patients were classified into the following groups. Group A1 included patients who took capecitabine 1 hour before radiotherapy, and Group B1 included all other patients. Group B1 was then subdivided into Group A2 (patients who took capecitabine 2 hours before radiotherapy) and Group B2. Group B2 was further divided into Group A3 and Group B3 with the same method. Total mesorectal excision was performed 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation and the pathologic response was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study. Pathologic examination showed that Group A1 had higher rates of complete regression of primary tumors in the rectum (23.5% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.01), good response (44.7% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.006), and lower T stages (p = 0.021) compared with Group B1; however, Groups A2 and A3 did not show any improvement compared with Groups B2 and B3. Multivariate analysis showed that increases in primary tumors in the rectum and good response were only significant when capecitabine was administered 1 hour before radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, the pathologic response could be improved by administering capecitabine 1 hour before radiotherapy.     

Prognostic impact of peritonealisation in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy: Extraperitoneal versus intraperitoneal rectal cancer

Background and purpose

The oncologic outcomes of extraperitoneal (EP) rectal cancer are known to differ from those of intraperitoneal (IP) rectal cancer; however, these differences have not been studied in rectal patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of peritonealisation in rectal patients treated by preoperative CRT.

Materials and methods

This study analyzed the data of 362 patients who received preoperative CRT and underwent curative surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer at 3-9 cm above the anal verge. Patients were categorised into EP and IP groups based on whether peritonealisation was present, according to pathology reports. The oncologic outcomes between the two groups were compared.

Results

Peritonealisation was absent in 330 patients and present in 32 patients. In univariate analysis, disease-free survival was significantly worse in the EP group than in the IP group (73.0% versus 93.5%, p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for recurrence: the absence of peritonealisation (p = 0.023), ypT stage (p = 0.015) and ypN stage (p < .0001).

Conclusions

Peritonealisation of rectal cancer may be a prognostic factor of disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative CRT and surgery.     

局部晚期直肠癌术前含草酸铂同步放化疗Ⅱ期临床研究

目的评价术前同步放疗与草酸铂和氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)或甲酰四氢叶酸钙(CF)联合化疗治疗局部晚期直肠癌的耐受性和有效性。方法58例初诊局部晚期直肠癌(T3～T4期)患者进入该研究,疗前获病理类型,腺癌54例,印戒细胞癌4例。放疗为3个野等中心技术,盆腔照射46 Gy分23次4.5周完成。在放疗第1周和第4周同步给予2个周期化疗,草酸铂130 mg/m~2第1天,5-FU 500 mg/m~2第1～3天和CF 200 mg/m~2第1～3天。放疗结束后4～6周进行手术。结果完成术前计划并行手术者55例,手术标本总有效率为58%,其中肿瘤全消(pCR)11例,仅检出少量残存肿瘤细胞21例。3级毒副反应包括中性粒细胞减少1例,腹泻3例,放射性直肠炎4例,肝功能异常1例。结论含草酸铂方案的术前联合放化疗耐受性良好,有效率高,应进一步随访并开展Ⅲ期临床试验,以明确对局部控制率和生存率的影响。     

Epidermal growth factor receptor as a predictor of tumor downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE: To examine retrospectively whether levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression can predict tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 183 patients with rectal cancer (cT3-T4 or N+) were enrolled in this study. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisted of 50.4 Gy of pelvic radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin bolus intravenous chemotherapy in 94 patients or oral capecitabine and leucovorin in 89 patients. EGFR expression in pretreatment paraffin-embedded tumor biopsy specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry. EGFR expression was determined from the intensity and extent of staining. Tumor downstaging was defined as a reduction of at least one T-stage level. RESULTS: Tumor downstaging occurred in 97 patients (53%), and the tumors showed a pathologic complete response in 27 patients (15%). Positive EGFR expression was observed in 140 (76%) of 183 patients. EGFR expression levels were low in 113 patients (62%) and high in 70 patients (38%). On logistic regression analysis, the significant predictive factor for increased tumor downstaging was a low level of EGFR expression and preoperative chemotherapy using oral capecitabine (odds ratio, 0.437; p = 0.012 vs. odds ratio, 3.235; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A high level of EGFR expression may be a significant predictive molecular marker for decreased tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND:

Although many trials have shown the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or postoperative CRT compared with surgery alone, the optimal sequence of radiotherapy and surgery is unclear. The authors reported the final results of this single institution prospective randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative CRT with postoperative CRT using capecitabine in survival, local control, sphincter preservation, and toxicity for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS:

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3, potentially resectable cT4 or N+) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative or postoperative CRT. CRT consisted of 50 Gy/25 fractions and concurrent capecitabine (1,650 mg/m²/day). Total mesorectal excision was performed.

RESULTS:

From March 2004 to April 2006, 240 patients were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between both arms, except for more low‐lying (<5 cm from anal verge) tumors in the preoperative CRT arm (60% vs 46%, P = .041). After a median follow‐up time of 52 months, the 3‐ and 5‐year disease‐free survival, overall survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were similar between both arms. However, for the patients with low‐lying tumors, the preoperative CRT arm had a higher rate of sphincter preservation (68% vs 42%, P = .008). Acute and late complication rates were similar between both arms.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although significant benefit of preoperative CRT in local control and survival was not demonstrated, the data showed that increased rate of sphincter preservation was possible in low‐lying tumors without jeopardizing local control and surgical complication by preoperative CRT. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Medium-term results of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil,and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, which was a powerful ploychemotherapy in those days in Japan.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2004, 26 patients with T3 or T4 and N0-2 non-metastatic resectable rectal cancer were selectively enrolled in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of irinotecan (80 mg/m²), 5-FU (500 mg/m²), and LV (250 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 for 4 weeks. Surgical resection was performed in all the patients 2–4 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy.

Results

Overall down-staging was observed in 15 patients. T level and N level down-staging were observed in 12 and 13 patients, respectively. A pathological complete response was observed in one patients. The median follow-up period was 75 months (range, 8–97 months). Recurrences occurred in 5 patients including pelvic relapses in 3 and distant metastases in 2. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 74% and 84%, respectively.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy comprised of a combination of multi-drugs as irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV may be beneficial to the prognoses of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: randomized trial comparing oral uracil and tegafur and oral leucovorin vs. intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

PURPOSE: To compare, in a randomized trial, 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) (FU+LV) vs. oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus LV (UFT+LV) given concomitantly with preoperative irradiation in patients with cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 155 patients were entered onto the trial. Patients received pelvic radiotherapy (4500-5,040 cGy in 5 to 6 weeks) and chemotherapy consisting of two 5-day courses of 20 mg/m(2)/d LV and 350 mg/m(2)/d FU in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (77 patients) or one course of 25 mg/d oral LV and 300 mg/m(2)/d UFT for 4 weeks beginning in the second week of radiotherapy (78 patients). The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and resectability rate. Secondary endpoints included downstaging rate, toxicity, and survival. RESULTS: Grade 3-5 acute hematologic toxicity occurred only with FU+LV (leukopenia 9%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in resectability rates (92.1% vs. 93.4%; p = 0.82). The pCR rate was 13.2% in both arms. Tumor downstaging was more frequent with UFT+LV (59.2% vs. 43.3%; p = 0.04). Three-year overall survival was 87% with FU+LV and 74% with UFT+LV (p = 0.37). The 3-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 7.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.619; relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.32-6.55). CONCLUSION: Although this study lacked statistical power to exclude clinically significant differences between both groups, the outcome of patients treated with UFT+LV did not differ significantly from that of patients treated with FU+LV, and hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the experimental arm.     

A phase II study of cetuximab,capecitabine and radiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) reduces local tumor recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase II study assessed neoadjuvant cetuximab with capecitabine-based CRT in LARC.

Methods

Patients with stage II/III LARC received capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks followed by intravenous cetuximab 400 mg/m² at week 3, then weekly intravenous 250 mg/m² cetuximab plus CRT including capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (including weekends during radiotherapy) with radiotherapy of 45 Gy (25 × 1.8 Gy), 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Total mesorectal excision was scheduled 4–6 weeks following completion of CRT. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR).

Results

Thirty-seven patients were eligible for safety and efficacy. TMN staging at baseline was: T4N2, 11%; T3N2, 40%; T2N2, 3%; T3N1, 35%; T2N1, 3% and T3N0 8%. The most common adverse events included, grade 1/2 acneiform skin rash (86%), and grade 3 radiodermatitis, (16%), diarrhea (11%) and hypersensitivity (5%). pCR was achieved in 3 patients (8%). Overall-, T- and N-downstaging rates were 73%, 57% and 81% respectively. Total sphincter preservation rate was 76%, and 53% in 17 patients whose tumors were located within 5 cm from the anal verge. Non-fatal perioperative complications occurred in 13 patients (35%) with delayed wound healing occurring in 6 patients (16%). One death was recorded due to sepsis following colonic necrosis.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant cetuximab with capecitabine-based CRT is tolerable in patients with resectable LARC. Whilst the pCR rate was similar to recent reports, a high pathological downstaging rate was achieved.     

Clinical parameters predicting pathologic tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To identify pretreatment clinical parameters that could predict pathologic tumor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study involved 351 patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery between October 2001 and July 2006. Tumor responses to preoperative CRT were assessed in terms of tumor downstaging and tumor regression. Statistical analyses were performed to identify clinical factors associated with pathologic tumor response. RESULTS: Tumor downstaging (defined as ypT2 or less) was observed in 167 patients (47.6%), whereas tumor regression (defined as Dworak's Regression Grades 3 or 4) was observed in 103 patients (29.3%) and complete regression in 51 patients (14.5%). Multivariate analysis found that predictors of downstaging were pretreatment hemoglobin level (p = 0.045), cN0 classification (p < 0.001), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p < 0.001), that predictors of tumor regression were cN0 classification (p = 0.044) and CEA level (p < 0.001), and that the predictor of complete regression was CEA level (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that pretreatment CEA level is the most important clinical predictor of pathologic tumor response. It may be of benefit in the selection of treatment options as well as the assessment of individual prognosis.     

局部进展期直肠癌术前新辅助治疗疗效分析

目的 观察术前同期放化疗或术前单纯放疗在T3、T4期或影像学淋巴结阳性直肠癌患者治疗中的疗效和安全性.方法 回顾分析2000 -2009年收治的141例局部进展期或影像学淋巴结阳性的直肠癌患者资料,其中术前同期放化疗97例,术前单纯放疗44例.放疗采用二维或三维技术,化疗采用4种方案.结果 随访率为91.5％,随访满3、5年者分别为106、68例.降期率达59.0％ (82/139),保肛手术率达65.5％ (91/139).3、5年总生存率分别为85.8％、65.7％,局部复发率分别为9.2％、14.1％,转移率分别为33.8％、45.8％.术前同期放化疗患者中位无瘤生存期优于术前单纯放疗(51:31个月,x2=12.88,P=0.000).肿瘤降期患者在远处转移时间上迟于未降期患者(60:29个月,x2=14.65,P=0.000).急性不良反应多为1、2级,伤口愈合延迟及吻合口瘘发生率低.结论 术前同期放化疗或术前单纯放疗能明显降低肿瘤分期、提高手术保肛率,不良反应小且绝大多数患者可耐受.     

KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Background and purpose

KRAS and BRAF are mutated in 35% and 10% of colorectal cancers, respectively. However, data specifically for locally advanced rectal cancers are scarce, and the frequency of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 remains to be established.

Materials and methods

DNA was isolated from pre-therapeutic biopsies of 94 patients who were treated within two phase-III clinical trials receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Mutation status of KRAS exons 1-3 and BRAF exon 15 was established using the ABI PRISM Big Dye Sequencing Kit and subsequently correlated with clinical parameters.

Results

Overall, KRAS was mutated in 45 patients (48%). Twenty-nine mutations (64%) were located in codon 12, 10 mutations (22%) in codon 13, and 3 mutations (7%) in codons 61 and 146. No V600E BRAF mutation was detected. The presence of KRAS mutations was correlated neither with tumor response or lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy nor with overall survival or disease-free survival. When KRAS exon 1 mutations were separated based on the amino-acid exchange, we again failed to detect significant correlations (p = 0.052). However, G12V mutations appeared to be associated with higher rates of tumor regression than G13D mutations (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

We are the first to report the mutation status of KRAS and BRAF in pre-therapeutic biopsies from locally advanced rectal cancers. The high number of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 emphasizes the importance to expand current mutation analyses, whereas BRAF mutations are not relevant for rectal carcinogenesis. Although the KRAS mutation status was not correlated with response, the subtle difference between G12V and G13D mutations warrants analysis of a larger patient population.     

Phase I trial of preoperative hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with incorporated boost and oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and an incorporated boost with concurrent capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The eligibility criteria included adenocarcinoma of the rectum, T3-T4 and/or N1-N2 disease, performance status 0 or 1, and age > or =18 years. Photon IMRT and an incorporated boost were used to treat the whole pelvis to 45 Gy and the gross tumor volume plus 2 cm to 55 Gy in 25 treatments within 5 weeks. The study was designed to escalate the dose to the gross tumor volume in 5-Gy increments in 3-patient cohorts. Capecitabine was given orally 825 mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days each week during RT. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated radiation dose, and the secondary endpoints were the pathologic response and quality of life. RESULTS: Eight patients completed RT at the initial dose level of 55 Gy. The study was discontinued because of toxicity-six Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 3 (38%) of 8 patients. All patients went on to definitive surgical resection, and no patient had a pathologically complete response. CONCLUSION: This regimen, using hypofractionated RT with an incorporated boost, had unacceptable toxicity despite using standard doses of capecitabine and IMRT. Additional research is needed to determine whether IMRT is able to reduce the side effects during and after pelvic RT with conventional dose fractionation.     

局部晚期低位直肠癌术前同步放化疗的疗效观察

目的 探讨术前同步放化疗治疗局部晚期低位直肠癌的安全性和有效性.方法 对临床分期属T3/T4低位直肠癌患者分为A组和B组.A组28例患者,给予术前放疗,同步口服卡培他滨.B组26例患者直接给予手术.结果 A组和B组根治术率分别为82.1％和50.0％ (P ＜0.01),保肛率分别为64.3％和26.9％ (P＜0.0...