Transperitoneal approach and right retroperitoneal dissection for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Most abdominal aortic aneurysms can be resected through a standard transperitoneal approach. In patients with large aneurysms, supra-renal extension of the aneurysm, those requiring renal reconstructive procedures and in patients who have had previous extensive intra-abdominal operations, alternative approaches have been recommended. We exposed the abdominal aorta in ten of these difficult patients using a midline transperitoneal incision and right retroperitoneal dissection that provided excellent exposure of the suprarenal aorta. We recommend this technique for performance of complicated abdominal aortic aneurysm resections.     

Total laparoscopic repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Surgical resection and grafting have long been the standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm and provide an excellent long-term outcome. However, there is tremendous impact on patients due to the surgical invasiveness. Endovascular aortic repair using stent graft was introduced in 1991. After refinement of the techniques and technology, endovascular aortic repair was approved by most health authorities and is associated with less periprocedural morbidities. In between these two extremes, some surgeons endeavored to create an alternative and perform less invasive surgeries. Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortic surgery and laparoscopic-assisted aortic surgery were introduced in 1996. In 2001, total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm resection with tube graft interposition was first performed in Canada. Till now, only a few vascular units in North America and Europe perform these delicate techniques. We report our first case of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Laparoscopic aortic surgery provides better visualization of the aneurysm neck, less bowel manipulation and avoidance of hypothermia. The minimal invasiveness could translate to better perioperative outcome. To our knowledge, this is also the first case report in Asia. The detailed techniques are described.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

There is a trend toward the use of minimally invasive surgery and limited incision for the surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Conventional AAA repair is performed with a large laparotomy wound and uses either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. Due to the older age of this patient population, they often suffer more from the surgical wound, require prolonged hospital stay and have a slower recovery. We describe the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for grafting of a 5.5-cm infrarenal AAA identified by computed tomography scan. The operator inserted the left hand with a Pneumo Sleeve device in the abdomen through a 7-cm midline supraumbilical incision for laparoscopic surgery. Using the left hand and laparoscopic instruments to do the surgery provided control over the operation and sensation of touch. At the completion of the laparoscopic dissection, the first Clawford clamp was applied above the aortic bifurcation through the laparoscopic incision. The second Clawford clamp was applied below the renal arteries through the midline laparotomy incision. After cross-clamping the AAA, the aneurysm was incised, the clot removed, and lumbar bleeding points were oversewn with 3-O prolene suture. Then, the aneurysmal segment was grafted with a Dacron prosthesis using conventional suturing technique. The patient was extubated 3 hours after the operation, stayed in the intensive care unit for 1 night and was discharged 7 days later. He resumed oral intake on the postoperative day 1. There were no complications. This case illustrates that hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for AAA can allow quick recovery of bowel function, quick progression to regular diet, short length of hospital stay, and probably a reduction in the total cost of care.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm and the pseudorupture syndrome

A consistently high mortality for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has given rise to an aggressive approach in the management of these patients. However, there is a group of patients who present with signs and symptoms suggesting a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm but instead have other life threatening conditions. These patients and their management are presented herein.     

Acute renal failure following operation for aortic aneurysm.

Thirty-eight patients with acute renal failure following operation for aortic aneurysm were analyzed retrospectively in search of predictors of survival. Of 14 potential predictor variablesonsidered, none taken singly were significant; however, the combination of age, operative interruption of renal blood flow and prior renal dysfunction served as a significant predictor, p less than 0.05. Low survival rates occurred if the patient was over 70 years of age, if renal blood flow required interruption or if preoperative renal impairment was present. High survival rates occured in patients less than 70 years of age who had no interruption of renal blood flow and who had normal preoperative renal function. Although the total mortality rate of these patients with acute renal failure was 61 per cent, only one of 12 patients with favorable prognostic indicators died. Acute renal failure following aortic aneurysm repair has no worse prognosis that that stated in the literature for acute renal failure following other surgical procedures. A virorous therapeutic approach should be maintained despite the advent of complications.     

Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies

OBJECTIVE: Lymphadenectomy is an integral part of staging and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. We evaluated the feasibility and oncologic value of laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in correlation to complication rate and body mass index. METHODS: Between August 1994 and September 2003, pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was performed in 650 patients at the Department of Gynecology of the Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena. Retrospective and prospective data collection and evaluation of videotapes were possible in 606 patients. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was part of the following surgical procedures: staging laparoscopy in patients with advanced cervical cancer (n = 133) or early ovarian cancer (n = 44), trachelectomy in patients with early cervical cancer (n = 42), laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer (n = 221), laparoscopy before exenteration in patients with pelvic recurrence (n = 20), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer (n = 112), and operative procedures for other indications (n = 34). RESULTS: After a learning period of approximately 20 procedures, a constant number of pelvic lymph nodes (16.9-21.9) was removed over the years. Pelvic lymphadenectomy took 28 min, and parametric lymphadenectomy took 18 min for each side. The number of removed paraaortic lymph nodes increased continuously over the years from 5.5 to 18.5. Right-sided paraaortic, left-sided inframesenteric and left-sided infrarenal lymphadenectomy took an average of 36, 28, and 62 min, respectively. The number of removed lymph nodes was independent from the body mass index of the patient. Duration of pelvic lymphadenectomy was independent of body mass index, but right-sided paraaortic lymphadenectomy lasted significantly longer in obese women (35 vs. 41 min, P = 0,011). The overall complication rate was 8.7% with 2.9% intraoperative (vessel or bowel injury) and 5.8% postoperative complications. No major intraoperative complication was encountered during the last 5 years of the study. CONCLUSION: By transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy, an adequate number of lymph nodes can be removed in an adequate time and independent from body mass index. The complication rate is low and can be minimized by standardization of the procedure.     

Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo determine whether the extraperitoneal approach for paraaortic staging lymphadenectomy results in a lower rate of surgical complications compared to the transperitoneal approach, without compromising oncological outcomes.MethodsProspective randomized multicenter study of patients with early endometrial or ovarian cancer undergoing paraaortic lymphadenectomy in 2010–2019. Patients were randomized to minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopy or robotic-assisted) using an extraperitoneal or a transperitoneal approach. The primary end point measure was a composite outcome that included developing one or more of the following surgical complications: bleeding during paraaortic lymphadenectomy ≥500 mL, any intraoperative complication related to paraaortic lymphadenectomy, severe postoperative complication (Dindo ≥ IIIA), impossibility to complete the procedure, or conversion to laparotomy.ResultsThere were 103 patients in the extraperitoneal group and 100 in the transperitoneal group. Differences in the composite outcome (transperitoneal 26.0% vs, extraperitoneal 18.4%; P = 0.195) were not found. Differences in the operative time, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative bleeding, or survival were not observed. A higher number of lymph nodes were retrieved through the extraperitoneal approached (median, interquartile range [IQR] 12 [7–17] vs, 14 [10–19]: P = 0.026). Older age and greater body mass index (BMI) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) increased the risk for surgical complications independently of the laparoscopic approach.ConclusionsThe extraperitoneal approach did not show differences regarding surgical and oncological parameters compared with the transperitoneal approach, although the number of aortic nodes retrieved was higher. The decision to use one or another laparoscopic route is a matter of the surgeon preference.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov.identifier: NCT02676726     

Two year prospective analysis of the Oxford experience with surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

During the two years from 1 November 1985 to 31 October 1987, 177 patients were admitted to a hospital in Oxford with the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aneurysm had ruptured in 88 patients, of whom 75 underwent emergent surgical treatment, yielding an operative mortality rate of 36 per cent. Of the 13 patients who did not have surgical treatment, two died before transfer to the operating room; in the other 11 patients, a deliberate decision was made not to undertake surgical treatment--in ten patients, the reason was an age of 85 years or more and in one patient, severe debilitating Parkinson's disease. Emergent operations were done upon another 15 patients--11 who had acute aneurysm and four in whom symptoms were not caused by an aneurysm. Emergent operations for ruptured or acute aneurysms represented 55 per cent of all operations for AAA. This high proportion and large number of emergent operations is in marked contrast with the experience of comparable specialist vascular surgical units in the United States. The 24-fold difference in mortality rates between surgical procedures performed electively and for ruptured aneurysm suggests that a considerable impact on over-all mortality could be achieved by a substantial increase in referral of patients     

Pregnancy after removal of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

A case of pregnancy complicated by an abdominal aortic aneurysm was treated by abdominal hysterotomy and resection of the aneurysm. The patient had a subsequent pregnancy without complication. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pregnancy following abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy.     

Immediate preoperative phlebotomy with autologous blood donation for aortic replacement

The preferential use of autologous blood provided by phlebotomy can reduce the need for homologous blood transfusion in patients undergoing extensive elective operations. This blood is usually provided either by intraoperative isovolemic hemodilution or phlebotomy one to two weeks preoperatively. To minimize the intraoperative time delay or preoperative period between phlebotomy and operation required in these patients, we performed preoperative isovolemic hemodilution in 69 patients one to two days prior to elective aortic replacement for infrarenal aneurysmal disease. Patients underwent phlebotomy a mean of 0.57 +/- 0.01 liter of whole blood; volume was replaced with lactated Ringer's solution. Hematocrit levels decreased from a mean value of 42.9 +/- 0.4 per cent to 33.7 +/- 0.3 per cent. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 1.2 +/- 0.05 liters. Hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, central venous pressure, oxygen delivery and systemic vascular resistance) remained stable throughout the perioperative and intraoperative time periods. In addition, we evaluated the technical modification of exclusion aneurysmorrhaphy (n = 50) versus open aneurysmorraphy (n = 19) on reduction of intraoperative homologous blood transfusion in these patients. Seventy-two per cent (36 of 50) of patients whose aneurysms were excluded received no homologous blood intraoperatively. Blood loss was decreased in the excluded versus open aneurysmorraphy group, 920 +/- 90 milliliters versus 2,030 +/- 250 milliliters, as were homologous blood transfusion requirements, 175 +/- 35 milliliters versus 570 +/- 119 milliliters. Two patients died (2.9 per cent mortality rate), and there was no increase in morbidity. Surgical treatment of large aortic aneurysms is frequently performed on an urgent basis; thus, provision of autologous blood for this operation in a short period of time may be beneficial. Isovolemic hemodilution performed during the immediate preoperative period can reduce homologous blood requirements and be safely performed without adverse effects on mortality, morbidity and myocardial performance. Exclusion aneurysmorrhaphy may further reduce dependence on homologous blood.