Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States

PURPOSE: We determined the methods and patterns of the evaluation of and treatment for adult anterior urethral stricture disease by practicing urologists in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nationwide survey of practicing members of the American Urological Association was performed by a mailed questionnaire. A total of 1,262 urologists were randomly selected from all 50 states, of whom 431 (34%) completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Most urologists (63%) treat 6 to 20 urethral strictures yearly. The most common procedures used by those surveyed for urethral strictures were dilation (92.8%), optical internal urethrotomy (85.6%) and endourethral stent (23.4%). Minimally invasive procedures are used more frequently that any open urethroplasty technique. Furthermore, most urologists (57.8%) do not perform urethroplasty surgery. When used, the most common urethroplasty surgeries performed were end-to-end anastomotic urethroplasty, perineal urethrostomy and ventral skin graft urethroplasty. Few urologists (4.2%) performed buccal mucosa grafts. For a long bulbar urethral stricture or short bulbar urethral stricture refractory to internal urethrotomy 20% to 29% of respondents would refer to another urologist, while 31% to 33% would continue to manage the stricture by minimally invasive means despite predictable failure. Of the urologists 74% believed that the literature supports a reconstructive surgical ladder, in which urethroplasty is only performed after repeat failure of endoscopic methods. CONCLUSIONS: Most urologists in the United States have little experience with urethroplasty surgery. Most urologists erroneously believe that the literature supports a reconstructive surgical ladder for urethral stricture management. Unfamiliarity with the literature and inexperience with urethroplasty surgery have made the use of endoscopic methods inappropriately common.     

Anterior urethral stricture review

Male anterior urethral stricture disease is a commonly encountered condition that presents to many urologists. According to a National Practice Survey of Board Certified Urologist in the United States most urologists treat on average 6-20 urethral strictures yearly. Many of those same urologists surveyed treat with repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy, despite continual recurrence of the urethral stricture. In point of fact, the urethroplasty despite its high success rate, is underutilized by many practicing urologists. Roughly half of practicing urologist do not perform urethroplasty in the United States. Clearly, the reconstructive ladder for urethral stricture management that was previously described in the literature may no longer apply in the modern era. The following article reviews the etiology, diagnosis, management and comparisons of treatment options for anterior urethral strictures.     

Reconstructive Management with Buccal Urethroplasty

We present the historical evolution of the use of buccal mucosa in reconstructive surgery, from the first application in ophthalmology to paediatric surgery and, finally, urethral surgery. This process spanned 99 yr, from 1894 to 1993. The harvesting of buccal mucosa from the cheek requires careful preoperative patient evaluation and selection. To avoid postoperative complications related to the harvesting site, we provide some suggestions based on a large series of patients. The use of a one- or two-stage repair procedure in penile urethroplasty is discussed, and some step-by-step surgical techniques are suggested. The reconstruction of the bulbar urethra using buccal mucosa in traumatic and nontraumatic strictures is also discussed, and different techniques are presented. Finally, appraisal and discussion of some challenging topics (eg, evidence for efficacy, complications, implications, worldwide use) concerning the use of buccal mucosa for urethral stricture reconstruction are presented based on the current literature.Patient summaryWe looked at the history and evolution of the use of buccal mucosa for reconstructive urethral surgery and found that harvesting the buccal mucosa from the cheek is a safe procedure. The use of buccal urethroplasty represents the gold standard in the management of patients with anterior urethral strictures.     

Narrative review of penile distal urethroplasties and suggestions for optimizing outcomes

Distal urethral strictures can be a challenging entity for urologists. Endoscopic maneuvers such as optical internal urethrotomies or dilations are even less successful than in other urethral locations and the repeated trauma will increase the scarring which advocates for a urethroplasty as primary option for patient management. Success rates of distal urethroplasties have been lower than those for other urethral strictures due to the anatomy of the distal urethra with a very thin corpus spongiosum associated with decreased mucosal blood supply. Also, the high prevalence of lichen sclerosus in this population with circumferential scarring is often a complicating factor. However, in the past two decades several surgical techniques have been described and further developed which has led to significant improvement in stricture recurrence rates. Meatoplasties are indicated for strictures limited to the meatus and involve opening of the stenotic meatus with subsequent reconstruction of it to minimize spraying of urine. Often, however, distal urethral strictures involve the fossa navicularis and may even extend further proximally. These strictures can be addressed with dorsal or ventral inlay procedures using buccal mucosa graft. In addition or alternatively, skin flaps can be mobilized to increase the urethral diameter. Lastly, multi-stage urethroplasty with buccal mucosa are a very successful approach yet given the high success rates of above mentioned procedures are usually reserved for revision surgery or most severe distal urethral strictures. In the following report, we are describing a variety of surgical techniques and their indication which should allow the practicing urologist to successfully address all encountered distal urethral strictures.     

Urethral reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present an up-to-date review on the main surgical techniques used to treat urethral strictures. RECENT FINDINGS: Anterior urethroplasty can be treated in outpatient surgical settings, thus decreasing the impact of urethroplasty. To improve outcome in adult patients, reconstructive surgeons have learned to apply the principles of hypospadias surgery, such as delicate tissue handling, avoidance of overlapping suture lines, tissue and the development of preputial skin flaps, to adult urethral surgery. Penile skin has been used as a free graft or harvested as a flap for some time, thanks to its location, hairless skin and durability. Since the early 1990s the use of buccal mucosa was introduced in genital reconstructive surgery and has become popular for complex urethral reconstructions. The use of fibrin glue was recently suggested to fix the buccal mucosal graft in a better way and to cover the anastomosis between the graft and urethral plate. SUMMARY: Urethral reconstructive surgery is changing rapidly and this change has posed problems for surgeons who see the principles that previously defined their profession becoming obsolete or unworkable. New techniques, new tools, such as fibrin glue, and new engineered material are a part of our future.     

Controversies in urethral reconstruction

Urethral strictures are a frequent source of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Open urethroplasty is regarded as the gold-standard treatment for urethral stricture disease. The treatment for urethral strictures is a continually evolving process and there is renewed controversy over the best approach to take in reconstructing the urethra, since the superiority of one approach over another has not yet been clearly defined. Anterior urethroplasty can be treated, with low morbidity, in an outpatient surgical setting, thus decreasing the impact of urethroplasty. In order to improve outcome in adult patients when the penile shaft is involved, reconstructive urethral surgeons have learned to apply the principles of delicate tissue handling, and the development of minimally invasive techniques. Genital or extra-genital skin has been used as a free graft or harvested as a flap for some time, thanks to its location, hairless skin and durability. Since the early 1990s, the use of oral mucosa was introduced in genital reconstructive surgery and has become popular for urethral reconstructions. Urethral reconstructive surgery is changing rapidly and this change has posed problems for surgeons who see the principles that previously defined their profession becoming obsolete or unworkable. New techniques and new engineered material are a part of our future.     

Management of anterior urethral strictures with buccal mucosa: Our pioneering experience

Urethral stricture management is a challenging surgery. Multiplicity of techniques means that none of them is ideal. No single technique is appropriate for all situations and the successful surgeon should have a store of operations to choose from according to each specific case. This review aims to provide an update on the different uses of buccal mucosal graft as a reconstructive and replacement tool for anterior urethral strictures management.     

Rational and selective management of patients with anterior urethral stricture disease

Introductionthe management of anterior urethral stricture is controversial. A review article was written, which updates the current situation of the surgical treatment of anterior urethral stricture.Materials and methodsthe experience of the Hospital del Trabajador in Santiago de Chile regarding its different surgical approaches, as well as scientific literature on the topic, were reviewed.Resultstraditionally, anterior urethral stricture has been treated using minimally invasive techniques (dilatation and internal urethrotomy), which are unable to cure more than 30-35% of patients. On the other hand, urethral reconstruction surgery (urethroplasty) is more complex and requires training, however it can cure a wide majority of patients in a single surgical procedure. Due to a lack of experience and training in reconstructive surgery, non-invasive methods are overused and abused, to the detriment of the patients’ quality of life. There is substantial evidence that internal urethrotomy is an excellent method for treating stricture of up to 1 cm in length, however its efficacy decreases drastically above 1.5 cm. Notwithstanding, urethroplasty is directly indicated for larger strictures, especially if prior urethrotomy failed.Conclusionthis procedure must be managed selectively, applying the appropriate treatment aimed at curing and not only palliating the disease. Urologists must be better trained in urethroplasty and/or centres of excellence must be established to be able to offer the best treatment in each case.     

口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄10年经验总结

目的 探讨口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的长期效果. 方法 2001年1月至2010年12月,应用口腔内黏膜(颊黏膜和舌黏膜)尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄255例.尿道狭窄段长度3 ～18 cm,平均6 cm.尿道成形采用保留原尿道板的扩大尿道成形术或埋藏黏膜条背侧替代尿道成形术.对49例尿道狭窄段≥8 cm者采取双侧颊黏膜拼接、颊粘膜与舌黏膜拼接或双侧连续长条舌黏膜尿道成形. 结果 术后随访8 ～120个月,平均37个月.230例患者排尿通畅,尿线粗,最大尿流率为16～51 ml/s,平均26 ml/s.尿道造影显示重建段尿道管腔通畅.总成功率90.2％.25例患者于术后1年内发生并发症,其中尿道再次狭窄17例,尿道皮肤瘘8例.17例尿道再狭窄患者中15例再次行口腔内黏膜尿道成形,2例吻合口狭窄行尿道内切开,术后排尿通畅;8例尿道皮肤瘘均接受尿瘘修补术后治愈. 结论 口腔颊黏膜和舌黏膜均是良好的尿道替代物,舌黏膜取材较颊黏膜更为便利;口腔内多种黏膜的组合移植重建尿道是治疗长段前尿道狭窄( ≥8 cm)的有效方法.     

Anterior urethral strictures

Aim

The aim of the present study was to determine the practice patterns in the management of anterior urethral strictures among urologists in Hong Kong.

Patients and Methods

A 14‐item questionnaire was delivered either directly or by mail to all 126 registered urologists in Hong Kong. Information including demographic data, number of anterior urethral strictures treated, diagnostic methods, treatment options and follow‐up strategy were collected. The questionnaire also asked for the personal opinion about the treatment plan of two stricture case scenarios.

Results

The response rate was 48 per cent. The majority (87 per cent) of urologists treated <10 anterior urethral strictures per year. Minimal invasive procedures, including urethral dilatation using metal sounds (77 per cent) or cystoscopy‐guided (74 per cent) and direct visual internal urethrotomy (57 per cent), were more commonly performed by urologists to treat urethral strictures. The majority of urologists (82.6 per cent) performed less than five urethroplasties per year. In the two case scenarios of long bulbous urethral stricture and recurrent short urethral stricture, approximately 10 per cent of respondents would refer the cases to other urologists and approximately 75 per cent would choose to perform reconstructive surgeries. The remaining 15 per cent of respondents would choose minimally‐invasive procedures for these strictures. Nearly two‐thirds (62.3 per cent) of urologists believed that urethroplasty should be proposed only after failed endoscopic treatment. Workups for urethral stricture disease were consistent, while the modalities to access the outcome were highly heterogeneous.

Conclusion

In Hong Kong, the majority of urologists choose to perform urethroplasty for long bulbous urethral strictures and recurrent short bulbous urethral strictures in a case scenario situation. However, in actual practice, most perform less than five urethroplasties per year. A small caseload, lack of experience and understanding of urethral reconstructive surgery means that most urologists in Hong Kong would hesitate to carry out primary urethroplasty in correctly‐selected patients for whom primary reconstruction would have been the treatment of choice.     

New frontiers in urethral reconstruction: injectables and alternative grafts

Contemporary management of anterior urethral strictures requires both endoscopic as well as complex substitution urethroplasty, depending on the nature of the urethral stricture. Recent clinical and experimental studies have explored the possibility of augmenting traditional endoscopic urethral stricture management with anti-fibrotic injectable medications. Additionally, although buccal mucosa remains the gold standard graft for substitution urethroplasty, alternative grafts are necessary for reconstructing particularly complex urethral strictures in which there is insufficient buccal mucosa or in cases where it may be contraindicated. This review summarizes the data of the most promising injectable adjuncts to endoscopic stricture management and explores the alternative grafts available for reconstructing the most challenging urethral strictures. Further research is needed to define which injectable medications and alternative grafts may be best suited for urethral reconstruction in the future.     

前尿道狭窄的病因和治疗

前尿道狭窄的发生率有增高趋势,如治疗不当,会进一步加重尿道损伤而造成复杂性前尿道狭窄,难于处理。近年来在其治疗上取得了很大进步,但多数泌尿外科医师对此病认识不足,治疗上存在差异,可能导致并发症的发生。     

口颊黏膜在尿道重建中的应用

随着尿道重建技术的不断改进,口颊黏膜替代尿道成形术逐渐成为前尿道缺损修复的最佳选择。本文主要对口颊黏膜的优势特点作一介绍,并阐述口颊黏膜替代尿道成形术在前尿道狭窄和尿道下裂中的临床应用和进展。     

Erectile function after urethral reconstruction

Advances in urogenital plastic surgical tissue transfer techniques have enabled urethral reconstruction surgery to become the new gold-standard for treatment of refractory urethral stricture disease. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term implications on sexual function after major genital reconstructive surgery. In this article, we review the pathologic features of urethral stricture disease and urologic trauma that may affect erectile function （EF） and assess the impact of various specific contemporary urethroplasty surgical techniques on male sexual function.     

Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures

Purpose of Review

Due to the proximity of the rhabdosphincter and cavernous nerves to the membranous urethra, reconstruction of membranous urethral stricture implies a risk of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. To avoid these complications, endoscopic management of membranous urethral strictures is traditionally favored, and bulboprostatic anastomosis is reserved as the main classical approach for open reconstruction of recalcitrant membranous urethral stricture. The preference for the anastomotic urethroplasty among reconstructive urologists is likely influenced by the familiarity and experience with trauma-related injuries. We review the literature focusing on the anatomy of membranous urethra and on the evolution of treatments for membranous urethral strictures.

Recent Findings

Non-traumatic strictures affecting bulbomembranous urethra are typically sequelae of instrumentation, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate cancer treatment, and pelvic irradiation. Being a different entity from trauma-related injuries where urethra is not in continuity, a new understanding of membranous urethral anatomy is necessary for the development of novel reconstruction techniques. Although efficacious and durable to achieve urethral patency, classical bulboprostatic anastomosis carries a risk of de-novo incontinence and impotence. Newer and relatively less invasive reconstructive alternatives include bulbar vessel-sparing intra-sphincteric bulboprostatic anastomosis and buccal mucosa graft augmented membranous urethroplasty techniques. The accumulated experience with these techniques is relatively scarce, but several published series present promising results. These approaches are especially indicated in patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate in which sparing of rhabdosphincter and the cavernous nerves is important in attempt to preserve continence and potency. Additionally, introduction of buccal mucosa onlay grafts could be especially beneficial in radiation-induced strictures to avoid transection of the sphincter in continent patients, and to preserve the blood supply to the urethra for incontinent patients who will require artificial urinary sphincter placement. The evidence regarding erectile functional outcomes is less solid and this item should be furtherly investigated.

     

Mundschleimhaut in der rekonstruktiven Harnröhrenchirurgie

The use of oral mucosa for urethral stricture repair has become the standard approach in reconstructive urethral surgery. Compared to other tissues oral mucosa shows several advantages, such as simple harvesting, good urine tolerance and low harvesting morbidity. For defects of the male bulbar urethra measuring 2 cm or longer, urethral reconstruction with oral mucosa is the procedure of choice. The oral mucosa graft can be used as an inlay or as an onlay graft. Most repairs can be completed in one stage but for complex strictures two stages are needed.     

手术治疗复杂尿道狭窄的技术探讨(附光盘)

尿道狭窄的疗效近年显著提高。对于前尿道狭窄,目前临床上应用口腔黏膜尿道成形术疗效满意,被公认为治疗前尿道狭窄的金标准。但对于长段前尿道狭窄,口腔黏膜移植物选取较长,手术颇为复杂。对于后尿道狭窄(或闭锁)的治疗,狭窄段切除端端吻合术是标准术式,但对于复杂的后尿道狭窄,由于狭窄段长、局部瘢痕较多、术野位置深、局部解剖层次不清而增加手术难度。本文重点阐述相关技术的注意事项和技术要点。