Naloxone does not attenuate the locomotor effects of ethanol in FAST,SLOW, or two heterogeneous stocks of mice

Rationale Previous studies suggest that some behavioral effects of ethanol and morphine are genetically correlated. For example, mice bred for sensitivity (FAST) or insensitivity (SLOW) to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol differ in their locomotor response to morphine. Objective To evaluate a possible common mechanism for these traits, we examined the effect of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, on ethanol- and morphine-induced locomotion in FAST and SLOW mice, as well as on ethanol-induced locomotion in two heterogeneous stocks of mice. Method In experiments 1 and 2, naloxone was given to FAST and SLOW mice 30 min prior to 2 g/kg ethanol or 32 mg/kg morphine, and locomotor activity was measured for 15 min (ethanol) or 30 min (morphine). In experiments 3 and 4, naloxone was administered 30 min prior to 1.25 g/kg ethanol, and locomotor activity was assessed in FAST mice and in a heterogeneous line of mice [Withdrawal Seizure Control (WSC)]. Experiment 5 assessed the effect of naloxone on ethanol-induced stimulation in outbred National Institutes of Health (NIH) Swiss mice. Results There was no effect of naloxone on the locomotor response to ethanol in FAST, SLOW, WSC, or NIH Swiss mice. However, naloxone did significantly attenuate the locomotor effects of morphine in FAST and SLOW mice. Conclusions These results suggest that a common opioidergic mechanism is not responsible for the correlated locomotor responses to ethanol and morphine in FAST and SLOW mice, and that activation of the endogenous opioid system is not critical for the induction of ethanol-induced alterations in activity.     

Accentuating effects of nicotine on ethanol response in mice with high genetic predisposition to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation

BackgroundCo-morbid use of nicotine-containing tobacco products and alcohol is prevalent in alcohol dependent individuals. Common genetic factors could influence initial sensitivity to the independent or interactive effects of these drugs and play a role in their co-abuse.MethodsLocomotor sensitivity to nicotine and ethanol, alone and in combination, was assessed in mice bred for high (FAST) and low (SLOW) sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol and in an inbred strain of mouse (DBA/2J) that has been shown to have extreme sensitivity to ethanol-induced stimulation in comparison to other strains.ResultsThe effects of nicotine and ethanol, alone and in combination, were dependent on genotype. In FAST and DBA/2J mice that show high sensitivity to ethanol-induced stimulation, nicotine accentuated the locomotor stimulant response to ethanol. This effect was not found in SLOW mice that are not stimulated by ethanol alone.ConclusionsThese data indicate that genes underlying differential sensitivity to the stimulant effects of ethanol alone also influence sensitivity to nicotine in combination with ethanol. Sensitivity to the stimulant effects of nicotine alone does not appear to predict the response to the drug combination, as FAST mice are sensitive to nicotine-induced stimulation, whereas SLOW and DBA/2J mice are not. The combination of nicotine and ethanol may have genotype-dependent effects that could impact co-abuse liability.     

Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1–12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2–8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8–2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.     

Psychosocial stress alters ethanol's effect on open field behaviors

Psychosocial stress, including social rank status, has been shown to alter spontaneously occurring behaviors in rodents as well as the behavioral effects of drugs of abuse. In this study, rats were repeatedly evaluated in a modified open field following: their initial exposure, and after intraperitoneal injections of saline and 0.75 g/kg ethanol (EtOH). All subjects were first tested while under single housing conditions, then again following 35 days of differential housing (singly or 3 rats/cage) with social status determined by scoring agonistic behavior at triad formation. The data suggest that (1) future subordinate rats differed with respect to specific aspects of behavior displayed in a 'novel' open field arena, (2) future subordinate rats were more emotional since they showed greater "anxiety-like" behavior and less exploratory behavior, (3) subordinate rats were more impaired by the saline injection stress, (4) subordinate rats were more sensitive to the depressant effects of EtOH, (5) grooming behavior did not show habituation, in contrast to the other behaviors, but showed sensitization on the second test. Overall, subordinate rats may have differed from their cage mates in innate anxiety, and this may underlie their distinct response to both stressors and EtOH. Furthermore, while EtOH had mostly stimulant effects in naive rats, psychosocial stress and/or repeated testing resulted in enhancement of EtOH's depressant effects.     

Environmental variables differentially affect ethanol-stimulated activity in selectively bred mouse lines

Low doses of ethanol (EtOH) stimulate activity in an open field in many strains of laboratory mice. We are selectively breeding two lines of mice to exhibit a large (FAST) response on this test, and two other lines to exhibit a small (SLOW) response (Crabbe et al. 1987). The lines initially diverged in response to EtOH, but despite continued selection pressure, the difference between each pair of FAST and SLOW lines has not increased over generations as much as expected. Our practice has been to test animals on the 1st day after saline injection, and repeat the test after EtOH injection 24 h later. Lister (1987) recently demonstrated that the order in which an animal was exposed to EtOH and saline influenced the magnitude of the response to EtOH, with animals tested initially after EtOH having greater stimulation. Middaugh et al. (1987) recently demonstrated that the magnitude of EtOH stimulation was greater under conditions of relatively bright light than under dim light. Using non-selected Swiss mice, the current experiments essentially confirmed Lister's findings. Using FAST and SLOW mice, the predictions of both groups were tested. Both hypotheses were confirmed. Additionally, these experiments demonstrated that the magnitude of the difference between FAST and SLOW mice was greater under bright light than under dim light. The line difference was also greater when tested in the EtOH-Saline order. In experiments with Swiss mice, the possible role of peritoneal irritation in the EtOH effect was eliminated, and the optimal dose and time for demonstrating the effect was determined. These experiments confirm the importance of lighting condition, order of testing, dose, and route of administration in eliciting EtOH-stimulated open field activity in mice. They demonstrate a genotype-environment interaction, since the magnitude of difference between genetically selected lines varied as a function of the testing parameters chosen. Finally, they indicate that the differences between FAST and SLOW lines in sensitivity to EtOH generalizes to several environmental conditions. We interpret this to mean that the various EtOH-induced activation traits represented by these different environmental and testing conditions are genetically correlated.     

GABAB receptor stimulation accentuates the locomotor effects of morphine in mice bred for extreme sensitivity to the stimulant effects of ethanol

Mice selectively bred for divergent sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol (FAST and SLOW) also differ in their locomotor response to morphine. The GABA(B) receptor has been implicated in the mediation of locomotor stimulation to both ethanol and morphine, and a reduction in ethanol-induced stimulation has been found with the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen in FAST mice. We hypothesized that GABA(B) receptor activation would also attenuate the locomotor stimulant responses to morphine in these mice. In order to test this hypothesis, baclofen was administered to FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice 15 min prior to morphine, and activity was recorded for 30 min. Baclofen attenuated stimulation to 32 mg/kg morphine in FAST-1 mice, but only at a dose that also reduced saline activity. There was no stimulant response to 32 mg/kg morphine in FAST-2 mice, or to 16 mg/kg or 48 mg/kg morphine in FAST-1 mice, but the combination of baclofen with these morphine doses accentuated locomotor activity. Therefore, it appears that GABA(B) receptor activation is not a common mechanism for the locomotor stimulant responses to ethanol and morphine in FAST mice; however, these data suggest that GABA(B) receptor activation may instead enhance some of the behavioral effects of morphine.     

Response to selection for ethanol-induced locomotor activation: genetic analyses and selection response characterization

Selectively bred FAST mice are highly susceptible, while SLOW mice are less susceptible, to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. Heritability estimates indicate that approximately 15% of the variance in the FAST lines is of additive genetic origin, while low susceptibility is ostensibly nonheritable. Inbreeding has increased at the rate of 2% per generation, but fertility has been unaffected. Measurement reliability for sensitivity to this ethanol effect was high when measured in both circular (r=0.6) and square (r=0.7) open-fields. In addition, our results indicate that we have selected for differences in sensitivity to ethanol rather than for differences in habituation to the test environment. The difference in response to ethanol between FAST and SLOW mice extended to tests varying in duration, and to a range of ethanol doses. We conclude that the divergence between FAST and SLOW mice generalizes to related test parameters, and speculate that the genetic architecture underlying the locomotor stimulant response may be simpler than previously proposed.Supported by a grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and by PHS-NIAAA Research Grants AA05828, AA06243, and AA06498, and PHS-NIDA Contract No. 217-87-8120     

Sensitivity to ethanol-induced motor incoordination in FAST and SLOW selectively bred mice

Earlier studies using the grid test have indicated a negative genetic correlation between sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation and ethanol-induced motor incoordination in FAST and SLOW mice, lines selectively bred for differential sensitivity to ethanol's stimulant effects. Because different tests of motor coordination may not measure the same behavioral competencies or physiological substrates, the present experiments tested adult ethanol- or saline-exposed FAST and SLOW mice of two replicates (FAST-1, FAST-2, SLOW-1, and SLOW-2) using three additional tests of coordination: a stationary dowel, fixed-speed rotarod, and accelerating rotarod. After ethanol treatment, FAST-1 mice fell from the stationary dowel at shorter latencies than SLOW-1 mice, suggesting that they had relatively greater sensitivity to ethanol. However, brain ethanol concentrations (BrECs) were similar at time of fall, and no differences were found between replicate-2 lines. SLOW-1 mice fell from the fixed-speed rotarod at lower BrECs than FAST-1 mice, suggesting possibly greater sensitivity of the SLOW-1 line. Again, no replicate-2 line differences were found. No significant differences were detected for the accelerating rotarod. These results provide little support for a negative genetic relationship between sensitivity to the stimulant and ataxic effects of ethanol using these measures of motor coordination.     

GABAB receptor stimulation accentuates the locomotor effects of morphine in mice bred for extreme sensitivity to the stimulant effects of ethanol

Mice selectively bred for divergent sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol (FAST and SLOW) also differ in their locomotor response to morphine. The GABA_B receptor has been implicated in the mediation of locomotor stimulation to both ethanol and morphine, and a reduction in ethanol-induced stimulation has been found with the GABA_B receptor agonist baclofen in FAST mice. We hypothesized that GABA_B receptor activation would also attenuate the locomotor stimulant responses to morphine in these mice. In order to test this hypothesis, baclofen was administered to FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice 15 min prior to morphine, and activity was recorded for 30 min. Baclofen attenuated stimulation to 32 mg/kg morphine in FAST-1 mice, but only at a dose that also reduced saline activity. There was no stimulant response to 32 mg/kg morphine in FAST-2 mice, or to 16 mg/kg or 48 mg/kg morphine in FAST-1 mice, but the combination of baclofen with these morphine doses accentuated locomotor activity. Therefore, it appears that GABA_B receptor activation is not a common mechanism for the locomotor stimulant responses to ethanol and morphine in FAST mice; however, these data suggest that GABA_B receptor activation may instead enhance some of the behavioral effects of morphine.     

Dopamine antagonist effects on locomotor activity in naive and ethanol-treated FAST and SLOW selected lines of mice

The FAST and SLOW lines of mice are being selectively bred in replicate for differential sensitivities to the locomotor activating effects of ethanol. Whereas FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice are stimulated by 2.0 g/kg ethanol, SLOW-1 and SLOW-2 mice are not stimulated, and are often depressed, by this dose. The dopamine antagonists, SCH-23390 (D₁) and raclopride (D₂), produced dose-dependent decreases in the locomotor activity of EtOH-naive mice of both lines and replicates; however, FAST and SLOW mice were not differentially sensitive to these effects. The absence of a line difference in activity response to the dopamine antagonists suggests that dopamine receptor function has not been altered by selective breeding for differences in sensitivity to the stimulant effects of ethanol. The ethanol-stimulated activity of FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice was decreased by administration of the dopamine antagonists, haloperidol and raclopride, at doses that had no effect on basal locomotor activity. SCH-23390 decreased ethanol-stimulated activity of FAST-1, but not FAST-2 mice. The ethanol-induced activity changes of SLOW mice were generally unaffected by antagonist administration. These results suggest a role for dopaminergic systems in mediating ethanol-stimulated activity in selectively bred FAST mice. Coadministration of SCH-23390 and raclopride decreased ethanol-induced activation to a greater degree than either drug alone, further suggesting that both D₁ and D₂ receptor systems contribute to the full expression of the ethanol stimulant response.This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, by NIAAA grants AA06498 and AA08621 (J.C.C. and T.J.P.), and by an N. L. Tartar Research Fellowship from the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon (E.H.S.). A portion of this work was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Master of Science degree, Department of Medical Psychology, Oregon Health Sciences University (E.H.S.).     

Within-subject comparison of the psychopharmacological profiles of oral oxycodone and oral morphine in non-drug-abusing volunteers

RATIONALE: The opioid peptide beta-endorphin (beta-E) is synthesized by the pro-opiomelanocortin gene in response to environmental stressors and alcohol administration and is implicated in the behavioral sequelae associated with these stimuli. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the influence of beta-E on the stress response by evaluating basal measures of anxiety as well as on EtOH-induced anxiolytic behavior using transgenic mice that differ with respect to beta-E. METHODS: Anxious behavior was evaluated for male and female heterozygous, wild-type, and beta-E knockout mice using the Light-Dark Box and Plus Maze assays. Subsequent tests evaluated behavior 20 min after administration of intraperitoneal saline or EtOH (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 g/kg). RESULTS: We observed a direct relationship between beta-E levels and the percentage of entries into open arms of the Plus Maze as well as the time spent in either the open arms or the light compartment of the Light-Dark box during basal conditions, suggesting that this peptide normally inhibits anxious behavior. However, mice lacking beta-E demonstrated an exaggerated anxiolytic response to EtOH in these assays. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that beta-E moderates the response to stressful stimuli and supports the hypothesis that this peptide influences the behavioral effects of EtOH.     

Indomethacin does not antagonize the anxiolytic action of ethanol in the elevated plus-maze

The present study was designed to examine whether the prostaglandin (PG) synthesis inhibitor indomethacin (INDO) could antagonize the anxiolytic effects of ethanol (EtOH) in the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. EtOH (1.6 g/kg) significantly increased the percentage of open arm entries and time spent on the open arms in both inbred C57BL/6J and outbred CD-1 mouse strains. However, this anxiolytic effect of EtOH was not significantly antagonized by pretreatment with INDO (5 and 10 mg/kg) in either strain. EtOH also significantly increased total arm entries in CD-1 mice, but not in the C57BL/6J strain. These data from C57BL/6J mice indicate that the low-dose stimulant properties of EtOH can be dissociated from the anxiolytic action of the drug in the plus-maze task. Finally, although INDO did not antagonize the stimulant effect of EtOH in the plus-maze task (in CD-1 mice), it did attenuate EtOH-induced stimulation of locomotor activity in an open-field arena. Taken together, these results suggest some specificity with regard to the role of PGs in mediating (or modulating) the neurobehavioral actions of EtOH, and further support the notion that the anxiolytic and stimulant effects of EtOH may be mediated by different mechanisms.     

Influence of fluoxetine and paroxetine in behavioral sensitization induced by ethanol in mice

The serotonergic system is involved in depression, anxiety and alcoholism. The rewarding properties of ethanol, mainly its anxiolytic and stimulant effects, as well as the development of dependence on ethanol have been related to the serotonergic system. Consequently, the use of selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) has been proposed in the treatment of alcoholism. In this study we investigated whether acute administration of the SSRIs fluoxetine or paroxetine is able to (i) reverse the behavioral effects induced by chronic ethanol consumption, and conversely, (ii) to determine whether acute ethanol is able to substitute for the chronically induced behavioral effects of fluoxetine or paroxetine. Four groups of male Swiss mice (n=60/group) received daily i.p. saline, ethanol (2 g/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) or paroxetine (5 mg/kg) for 27 days. On the 28th day, each group was challenged with saline, ethanol, fluoxetine or paroxetine. The 14 groups (SS, SE, SP, SF, EE, ES, EP, EF, PP, PE, PS, FF, FE, and FS) were then tested in open field, activity cage and plus-maze. EP and EF groups were able to reverse the behavioral sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of chronic ethanol administration. In contrast, a sensitized stimulatory effect was observed in chronically fluoxetine- or paroxetine treated mice challenged with ethanol (PE and FE). An anxiolytic effect was observed whether ethanol was substituted for SSRI or, conversely, SSRI was substituted for ethanol. SSRIs facilitated ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization, although SSRIs by themselves are unable to produce the locomotor stimulation similar to that induced by ethanol. Finally, SSRIs are unable to interfere in the ethanol anxiolytic effect.     

Voluntary wheel running reduced the effects of acute ethanol on activity and avoidance in C57BL/6J mice.

C57BL/6J mice were given five weeks of voluntary wheel running and then studied for behavioral impairment after an intoxicating dose of ethanol. Forty-four mice, 22 males and 22 females, were assigned to Wheel (free access to a running wheel in the home cage) or No Wheel conditions. At the end of the training period, animals were removed from the exercise cages and tested for noise avoidance after 2.4 g/kg ethanol (EtOH) or physiological saline (Sal). Mice could avoid 87.5-dB noise by entering and remaining in a randomly designated "safe corner." In unexercised animals, EtOH caused a strong suppression of locomotor activity and avoidance behavior: No Wheel EtOH mice differed significantly from No Wheel Sal mice on both measures. In exercised animals, EtOH failed to cause significant suppression: Wheel EtOH animals did not differ significantly from Wheel Sal animals on either measure. The present results suggest that prior exercise training may be effective in offsetting the effects of acute ethanol intoxication.     

Effects of isolation-rearing on locomotion, anxiety and responses to ethanol in Fawn Hooded and Wistar rats

Voluntary ethanol (EtOH) consumption is increased by isolation-rearing in several rat strains. The following experiments examined the effects of isolation-rearing on basal and ethanol-stimulated behavior in Fawn Hooded rats, an alcohol-preferring rat strain, compared to Wistar rats. Locomotor activity and anxiety were examined under both conditions. Basal locomotor activity was higher in isolated subjects of both strains in low light conditions, but under bright light conditions, this difference was only observed in Wistar rats. Locomotor stimulant effects of EtOH were only observed in isolation-reared rats. In the elevated plus maze, Fawn Hooded rats were more anxious than Wistar rats under low light conditions, but under bright light conditions, Wistar socials were less anxious than all of the other groups. Administration of 1.5 mg/kg EtOH produced an anxiolytic response in the elevated plus maze under bright light conditions in Fawn Hooded rats, but to a lesser degree Wistar rats, particularly Wistar isolates. In conclusion, although both strain and isolation-rearing had effects on locomotion and anxiety as well as the stimulatory and anxiolytic effects of EtOH, these effects appeared to be independent. Received: 16 July 1997 / Final version: 15 December 1997     

Voluntary ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice before and after sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol

RATIONALE: Drug-induced sensitization has been associated with enhanced drug self-administration and may contribute to drug addiction. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the possible association between sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol (EtOH) and voluntary EtOH consumption. METHODS: Mice of the EtOH-avoiding DBA/2J (D2) and EtOH-preferring C57BL/6J (B6) inbred strains were offered the choice of an EtOH solution versus tap water (EtOH-experienced) or just water (Na), and voluntary consumption was measured. Mice from each condition then received repeated EtOH or saline injections, and locomotor responses were measured. Subsequently, all mice were offered the choice of EtOH versus water, and voluntary consumption was again measured. A subsequent study examined relative susceptibility of D2 and B6 mice to EtOH-induced locomotor sensitization. RESULTS: Voluntary EtOH consumption induced locomotor sensitization to an EtOH challenge in B6 mice. D2 mice consumed little EtOH, but developed sensitization with repeated EtOH treatments as expected. EtOH consumption was not altered in EtOH-sensitized D2 mice. Unexpectedly, B6 mice developed significant sensitization, and following sensitization, the EtOH-experienced EtOH-sensitized group consumed more EtOH than their EtOH-experienced salinetreated (non-sensitized) counterparts. In an independent study, B6 mice required between three and five EtOH injections to express sensitization, whereas for D2 mice, between one and three EtOH exposures were sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Development of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of EtOH may be associated with increased EtOH consumption in mice with high initial avidity for EtOH. In the same mice, voluntary EtOH consumption can also produce behavioral sensitization to the effects of EtOH.     

Increases in anxiety-like behavior induced by acute stress are reversed by ethanol in adolescent but not adult rats

Repeated exposure to stressors has been found to increase anxiety-like behavior in laboratory rodents, with the social anxiety induced by repeated restraint being extremely sensitive to anxiolytic effects of ethanol in both adolescent and adult rats. No studies, however, have compared social anxiogenic effects of acute stress or the capacity of ethanol to reverse this anxiety in adolescent and adult animals. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate whether adolescent [postnatal day (P35)] Sprague-Dawley rats differ from their adult counterparts (P70) in the impact of acute restraint stress on social anxiety and in their sensitivity to the social anxiolytic effects of ethanol. Animals were restrained for 90 min, followed by examination of stress- and ethanol-induced (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 g/kg) alterations in social behavior using a modified social interaction test in a familiar environment. Acute restraint stress increased anxiety, as indexed by reduced levels of social investigation at both ages, and decreased social preference among adolescents. These increases in anxiety were dramatically reversed among adolescents by acute ethanol. No anxiolytic-like effects of ethanol emerged following restraint stress in adults. The social suppression seen in response to higher doses of ethanol was reversed by restraint stress in animals of both ages. To the extent that these data are applicable to humans, the results of the present study provide some experimental evidence that stressful life events may increase the attractiveness of alcohol as an anxiolytic agent for adolescents.     

Exercise-Associated Changes in the Corticosterone Response to Acute Restraint Stress: Evidence for Increased Adrenal Sensitivity and Reduced Corticosterone Response Duration

Exercise promotes stress resistance and is associated with reduced anxiety and reduced depression in both humans and in animal models. Despite the fact that dysfunction within the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis is strongly linked to both anxiety and depressive disorders, the evidence is mixed as to how exercise alters the function of the HPA axis. Here we demonstrate that 4 weeks of voluntary wheel running was anxiolytic in C57BL/6J mice and resulted in a shorter time to peak corticosterone (CORT) and a more rapid decay of CORT following restraint stress. Wheel running was also associated with increased adrenal size and elevated CORT following systemic administration of adrenocorticotropic hormone. Finally, the HPA-axis response to peripheral or intracerebroventricular administration of dexamethasone did not suggest that wheel running increases HPA-axis negative feedback through GR-mediated mechanisms. Together these findings suggest that exercise may promote stress resilience in part by insuring a more rapid and shortened HPA response to a stressor thus affecting overall exposure to the potentially negative effects of more sustained HPA-axis activation.     

Tolerance to the effects of ethanol on the speed and success of reaction time responding in the rat: effects of age and intoxicated practice

An animal model of human reaction time (RT) was used to investigate the effects of age and intoxicated practice on the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of ethanol (EtOH). Young (8–9 month) and old (24–26 month) Fischer 344 rats were trained to release a lever in response to an auditory and visual stimulus in order to avoid mild footshock. The animals were divided into groups to receive either intoxicated (EtOH-before) or unintoxicated (EtOH-after) RT testing. Successful avoidance and response latencies were impaired in young and old rats after the initial exposure to EtOH (EtOH-before group). Tolerance developed to EtOH's effects on successful avoidance and on response latencies whether or not the rats received intoxicated RT practice; however, intoxicated practice facilitated tolerance development to EtOH's effects on successful avoidance but not on response latencies. While the initial sensitivity and the level of tolerance that developed to EtOH's effects were similar in young and old rats, the old rats were generally more sensitive to EtOH and developed tolerance at a slower rate. These results suggest that tolerance develops to the effects of EtOH on RT and that intoxicated practice can have different effects on the parameters of the behavioral response.     

FAST and SLOW ipsilateral and contralateral spinal reflexes in the neonate rat are modulated by 5-HT.

1. Three ipsilateral (MSR, PSR, IPSI SLOW) and two contralateral segmental reflexes (CON FAST, CON SLOW) were recorded from L4 or L5 ventral roots of the neonate rat spinal cord in vitro. MSR, PSR and CON FAST were evoked from lower threshold afferents; more intense stimulation evoked IPSI SLOW and CON SLOW. 2. Kainate/AMPA receptors were involved in mediation of MSR, PSR, CON FAST, IPSI SLOW and CON SLOW and NMDA receptors in mediation of CON FAST, IPSI SLOW and CON SLOW. 3. All five reflexes were depressed by 5-HT (IC50 1.2-7.9 microM; order of sensitivity, CON SLOW > CON FAST = IPSI SLOW > MSR = PSR); and by 5-CT (IC50 1.9-8.8 nM; order of sensitivity, MSR > IPSI SLOW = CON FAST = CON SLOW > PSR). alpha-Me-5-HT also depressed all five reflexes. 4. Dipropyl-5-CT selectively depressed MSR and CON SLOW (IC50 90-170 nM) but was less potent than 5-CT. 8-OH-DPAT selectively depressed MSR (IC50 1.1 microM), IPSI SLOW and CON SLOW (IC50 5.7-7.6 microM), while methylsergide depressed only MSR (IC50 26 nM). 5. Phenyl biguanide and m-chlorophenyl biguanide (5-HT3 receptor agonists) had no significant effects on any reflex. 6. It is concluded that a 5-HT1-like receptor mediates depression of the MSR. A different receptor or a mixed population of receptors, but not 5-HT3 receptors, mediate inhibition of PSR, CON FAST, IPSI SLOW and CON SLOW.