肿瘤细胞减灭术后行腹腔热灌注5-FU+卡铂化疗联合静脉化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的效果观察

目的 观察肿瘤细胞减灭术后行腹腔热灌注5-FU+卡铂化疗联合静脉化疗对晚期卵巢癌的效果。方法 选取河南省平煤神马医疗集团总医院98例晚期卵巢癌患者,随机分为两组。比较两组患者的临床疗效差异。结果 相比对照组,研究组客观缓解率显著升高、（P <0.05）。两组患者术后发热及肛门排气时间、心血管系统毒性及肾功能损伤的情况差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。研究组术后腹胀时间持续6～7 d的患者、骨髓抑制、肝功能损伤及胃肠道反应的情况明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。结论 肿瘤细胞减灭术后行腹腔热灌注5-FU+卡铂化疗联合静脉化疗可有效改善晚期卵巢癌的临床疗效,明显减少机体不良反应的发生,提高患者的生存质量,具有较高的有效性和良好的安全性,值得临床应用。     

腹腔灌注与静脉化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效对比研究

目的：比较单纯静脉给药化疗与腹腔灌注化疗2种给药途径治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的临床疗效。方法：选取天津市第五中心医院62例晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者,将患者随机分为静脉滴注组和腹腔灌注组。静脉滴注组方案：紫杉醇135 mg/m2静脉滴注,24 h 后顺铂75 mg/m2静脉滴注;腹腔灌注组方案：紫杉醇135 mg/m2静脉滴注,24 h 后顺铂100 mg/m2腹腔灌注,第8天给予紫杉醇60 mg/m2腹腔灌注。所有患者进行随访,分别对2组患者的近期疗效、远期疗效和不良反应等进行比较。结果：腹腔灌注组肿瘤缓解率较静脉滴注组有增高趋势,但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;腹腔灌注组的疾病无进展生存期（progression-free survival,PFS）和2年生存率均显著高于静脉滴注组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。腹腔灌注组的不良反应发生率高于静脉滴注组,2组贫血、肝功能损害及神经毒性发生率差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：腹腔灌注化疗可有效提高晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的PFS和2年生存率,改善患者预后。     

腹腔热灌注联合多西他赛、奥沙利铂静脉化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌疗效观察

目的:探讨肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)后腹腔热灌注联合多西他赛、奥沙利铂静脉化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床疗效。方法:取2011年1月至2014年12月在河北医科大学第二医院就诊的晚期卵巢癌患者42例,其中观察组21例(CRS后+腹腔热灌注+多西他赛、奥沙利铂静脉化疗)、紫杉醇+卡铂组21例(CRS后+紫杉醇、卡铂静脉化疗)。比较两组的疗效、肿瘤控制、腹水控制、生活质量、治疗过程中的不良反应及并发症、无进展生存期(PFS)等。结果:观察组与对照组肿瘤控制差异无统计学意义(P0.05);腹水控制、生活质量、PFS均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。不良反应及并发症无明显差异(P0.05)。结论:在临床上对于晚期卵巢癌患者采取CRS术后腹腔热灌注联合多西他赛、奥沙利铂静脉化疗,对于患者的疗效、肿瘤控制、腹水控制、生活质量、PFS有提高,且不明显增加不良反应及并发症。     

术前髂内动脉灌注化疗治疗卵巢癌并腹水23例疗效分析

目的探讨术前髂内动脉灌注化疗治疗卵巢癌并腹水的效果.方法采用术前髂内动脉灌注化疗治疗卵巢癌并腹水23例.结果总有效率为66.6%,手术中吸出腹水量明显少于未治疗组(P＜0.05),经髂内动脉灌注化疗后行肿瘤减灭术者亦高于未治疗组(P＜0.05),而术中失血量无明显增加.结论对晚期卵巢癌并腹水患者术前髂内动脉灌注化疗可减少腹水形成,提高手术效果.     

顺铂腹腔热灌注联合紫杉醇对晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者血清肿瘤标志物、免疫指标水平和预后的影响分析

目的 观察顺铂精准持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗(IPHC)联合紫杉醇治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的疗效及对患者血清中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、可溶性B7H4蛋白表达和预后的影响。方法 选取2019年1月至2021年12月湖南中医药大学第一附属医院收治的104例晚期EOC患者作为观察对象,以随机余数法分为观察组与对照组各52例,对照组行常规静脉化疗,观察组行精准持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗(IPHC)联合静脉化疗。对比两组治疗6个周期后(126 d)的临床效果,比较治疗前、治疗126 d后两组肿瘤标志物【糖类抗原125(CA125)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、人附睾上皮分泌蛋白4(HE4)】、血清学指标【碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)、VEGF、可溶性B7H4蛋白】、T淋巴细胞亚群指标的变化情况,统计两组治疗期间并发症的发生率。结果 治疗126 d后,观察组治疗OR率高于对照组(P <0.05);治疗后,两组各肿瘤标志物(CA125、CEA、AFP、HE4)、血清相关因子(bFGF、VEGF、B7H4)及CD8⁺水平均降低,且观察组低于对照组(P ...     

研究腹腔灌注结合静脉化疗方案治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效

目的研究晚期卵巢癌患者采用腹腔灌注联合静脉化疗的疗效。方法随机选取我院晚期卵巢癌患者68例作为研究对象,随机分为对照组34例患者采用紫杉醇+顺铂联合静脉注射化疗与实验组34例患者则将顺铂采用腹腔灌注与紫杉醇静脉化疗结合作为治疗方案。疗程6个月,对比两组患者的相关指标。结果实验组患者的疗效比对照组显著,不良反应发生率比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论采用腹腔灌注与静脉化疗结合的方式对晚期卵巢癌的患者进行化疗能够提高疗效,减轻患者痛苦。     

新型热灌注机及装置在21例卵巢癌术中腹腔热灌注化疗的应用

目的:总结新型热灌注机及装置在卵巢癌术中行腹腔热灌注化疗的临床应用情况及安全性.方法:21例卵巢癌患者均在全身麻醉下行开腹卵巢癌减灭术,术中采用新型热灌注机及装置行腹腔热灌注化疗.灌注液为3500 ml 0.9％氯化钠液加顺铂,流量2000～ 2800 ml/min,灌注时间60 ～ 90分钟.结果:所有患者均成功接受了腹腔热灌注化疗.17例有腹水患者,热灌注化疗前腹水肿瘤脱落细胞检查阳性,热灌注化疗后未见肿瘤细胞.入腹腔水温(42.30±0.25℃)与出腹腔水温(41.91±0.24℃)比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).热灌注化疗后患者心率平均增快8/min左右,鼻温增高1.5℃左右(P＜0.05);血压无明显变化(P＞0.05).无与热灌注相关的并发症发生,化疗药物毒副反应轻微.结论:应用新型热灌注机及装置在卵巢癌术中行腹腔热灌注化疗,可以满足热灌注化疗的基本要求,有利于保证热灌注化疗效果,对患者影响较小.     

主动循环热灌注化疗对卵巢癌腹水疗效及HE4、CA125、VEGF和B7-H4水平的影响

目的 探讨卵巢癌腹水患者采用主动循环腹腔热灌注化疗治疗的效果及对血清肿瘤相关标记物水平的影响.方法 选取84例卵巢癌伴腹水患者,根据腹腔热灌注化疗方法分为主动循环组和常规组各42例,两组患者采用紫杉醇+顺铂实施不同的腹腔热灌注治疗.结果 主动循环组与常规组进入腹腔时的灌注液体温度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),抽出腹...     

妇科恶性肿瘤术毕即刻腹腔化疗及术中髂内动脉灌注化疗对患者术后恢复的影响

目的：探讨在妇科恶性肿瘤治疗中,术毕即刻腹腔化疗和术中动脉灌注化疗的可行性。方法：对１９９４年５月至１９９６年４月,１０２例卵巢恶性肿瘤术毕即刻腹腔化疗和１８例妇科其他癌瘤术中盆腔动脉灌注化疗患者（化疗组）术后恢复情况,进行回顾性分析,并与同期９７例未接受化疗的患者（对照组）比较。结果：化疗组术后呕吐率为５７．５０％,高于对照组（Ｐ＜０．０５）;术后第二天自行排气率为５５．８３％,低于对照组（Ｐ＜０．０５）;对体温影响两组无明显差异;两组患者近期观察术后伤口浅表裂开分别为４例（３．３３％）和３例（３．０９％）,伤口炎症反应分别为１１例（９．１７％）和８例（８．２５％）无明显差异,远期随访均未发现伤口裂开及腹壁疝形成。结论：妇科恶性肿瘤患者,需要时可以实施术毕即刻腹腔灌注和术中动脉灌注化疗。     

腹腔热灌注化疗联合静脉化疗用于晚期卵巢癌的meta分析

目的系统评价腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitioneal chemotherapy, HIPEC)联合静脉化疗(Intravenous chemotherapy, IC)治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和安全性。方法检索PUBMED、VLP、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库中比较HIPEC联合IC(研究组)与单纯IC治疗晚期卵巢癌的随机对照研究(RCT),检索时限从建库至2018年6月。按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价质量后,使用RevMan 5.2软件进行meta分析。结果共纳入12个RCT,798例患者。meta分析结果显示:研究组临床有效率(RR=1.53,95%CI:1.34～1.75,P 0.05)、腹水控制率(RR=1.55,95%CI:1.27～1.88,P 0.05)均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义。在安全性方面,研究组骨髓抑制发生率(RR=0.7,95%CI:0.65～0.96)明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组1年生存率、肝肾功能损害和恶心呕吐发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔热灌注化疗联合静脉化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌可提高患者的临床有效率、腹水控制率,安全性较好,但1年生存率无明显差异。     

Effects of intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effect of intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) in ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 117 stages Ic-III ovarian cancer patients, who were diagnosed at the Gynecology Department of Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital between January 1994 and January 2000. Of these, 57 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery (conventional treatment) with IPHC and 60 patients (control group) underwent conventional treatment only. IPHC consisted of administering a mixture of 350 mg/m(2) of carboplatin and 5,000,000 IU/m(2) of interferon-alpha, and maintaining the intraperitoneal temperature at 43-44 degrees C during surgery. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 58.6%; that of the IPHC group was 63.4% vs. 52.8% in the control group, with significantly higher survival in the IPHC group (P = 0.0078). Considering stage III ovarian cancer patients only (n = 74), the survival rate was 53.8% in the IPHC group (n = 35) and 33.3% in the control group (n = 39) and was significantly higher in the IPHC group (P = 0.0015). For stage III ovarian cancer patients whose tumor was reduced to less than 1 cm during a second procedure (n = 53), the 5-year survival rate was 65.6% in patients who underwent IPHC (n = 26) and 40.7% in the control patients (n = 27) (P = 0.0046). IPHC was an independent prognostic factor that was not affected by surgical staging, tumor size after second surgery, or patient age, according to a multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio = 0.496, P = 0.0176). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that IPHC is a promising new treatment modality in ovarian cancer.     

剂量密集化疗治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌疗效观察

目的：探讨剂量密集化疗和标准化疗方案治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的临床疗效。方法：选取天津市第五中心医院院内化疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者共89例,将患者随机分为剂量密集组45例和标准方案组44例,2组患者的年龄、病理分型和肿瘤临床分期差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。标准方案组：紫杉醇180 mg/m2（静脉滴注维持3 h）,随后使用卡铂AUC 6（静脉滴注维持1 h,第1天）,间隔3周,共6个疗程。剂量密集组：紫杉醇80 mg/m2第1,8,15天+卡铂AUC 6（静脉滴注维持1 h,第1天）,每周期间隔3周,共6个疗程。2组进行治疗并随访3年,分别对2组患者的近期疗效、远期疗效和不良反应等进行比较。结果：剂量密集组总体缓解率高于标准方案组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;疾病无进展生存期（PFS）和3年生存率指标的比较,剂量密集组显著高于标准方案组（P＜0.01）;虽然其不良反应发生率亦高于标准方案组,但仅Ⅲ～Ⅳ级贫血发生率2组相比差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,其余发生率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：剂量密集化疗可有效提高晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的3年生存率,延缓肿瘤复发。     

Treatment of ovarian cancer with paclitaxel- or carboplatin-based intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy during secondary surgery

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of treating advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel or carboplatin in intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) during secondary surgery. METHODS: We reviewed clinical data of 96 eligible patients with stage Ic-IIIc epithelial ovarian cancer. After primary staging operation and 6-12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, 22 patients were treated with IPHC-paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and 45 patients were treated with IPHC-carboplatin (350 mg/m(2)) during secondary surgery. Survival rates were compared with those of 29 patients treated with only conventional therapy (control group). RESULTS: In stage III diseases, 5-year survival rates were 84.6% in IPHC-paclitaxel, 63.0% in IPHC-carboplatin (P=0.4098) and 32.8% in control group (vs. IPHC, P=0.0003). Three-year progression-free survival rates in stage III diseases were both 56.3% in IPHC-paclitaxel and IPHC-carboplatin (P=0.8911) and 16.7% in control group (vs. IPHC, P=0.0028). For the relative risk of disease progression yielded from multivariate analyses, hazard ratio of IPHC-paclitaxel was 0.281 (P=0.0039) and that of IPHC-carboplatin was 0.443 (P=0.0083). Like carboplatin (hazard ratio: 0.396, P=0.0004), IPHC-paclitaxel considerably decreased the risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.197, P=0.0253). CONCLUSION: In advanced ovarian cancer, IPHC using paclitaxel or carboplatin during secondary surgery could be a candidate for regional consolidation therapy to prolong survival and hinder disease progression.     

Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy using carboplatin: a phase I analysis in ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Cyclic platinum-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy has proven to be effective after optimal surgical cytoreduction in ovarian carcinoma. Hyperthermia is directly cytotoxic and enhances chemotherapy tumoricidal effects. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carboplatin used intraoperatively as intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC), the effect on postoperative systemic chemotherapy administration, and the potential for repeat IPHC at second look surgery. METHODS: Using the ThermoChem HT System, escalating doses of carboplatin (400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 mg/m(2)) were administered intraoperatively as IPHC with a perfusion time of 90 min. A subgroup of eight patients that received initial IPHC and subsequent systemic chemotherapy underwent second look reassessment surgery with IPHC. RESULTS: The first 4 dose levels were well tolerated without dose-defining toxicity. The initial two patients treated at 1200 mg/m(2) developed grade 4 myelosuppression thus defining the MTD at 1000 mg/m(2). Newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients receiving the initial IPHC at the MTD defined above completed standard systemic chemotherapy with six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Eight patients having initial IPHC and systemic chemotherapy subsequently had repeat IPHC performed at second look laparotomy without grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Four patients were found to have extensive adhesions at the time of second look reassessment surgery yet completed IPHC. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for intraperitoneal carboplatin administered as IPHC was established at 1000 mg/m(2). IPHC at the initial cytoreductive procedure did not preclude subsequent systemic chemotherapy. In addition, repetitive IPHC was feasible at second look reassessment surgery.     

Treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with secondary cytoreduction and continuous intraoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (CIIPHCP)

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the combined effect of secondary cytoreduction and continuous intraoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (CIIPHCP), in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, in a phase II clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive, heavily pre-treated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, were treated with a combination of cytoreductive surgery and CIIPHCP. All patients had extended peritoneal carcinomatosis. In 14 out of the 20 pts (70 %) the recurrence occurred during chemotherapy or within 6 months after the end of the chemotherapy. Thirteen pts (65 %) had preoperatively malignant ascites, whereas the remaining seven pts (35 %) had positive peritoneal cytology washings. RESULTS: No complications emerged during operation and CIIPHCP. Median ascites-free period after CIIPHCP was 21 months (range 3-109). Median survival time for patients with residual disease less than 1.5 cm was 29.0 months, whereas for patients with residual disease equal or greater than 1.5 cm, the median survival time was 7.0 months. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The survival data of our patients and the disappearance of the malignant ascites postoperatively suggest that continuous intraoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion is an effective treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.     

腹腔温热化疗在晚期卵巢癌中的临床应用

多数卵巢癌患者确诊时已属临床晚期,虽然经过理想的肿瘤细胞减灭术及以顺铂为基础的联合化疗,仍有部分患者出现复发、耐药。因此,晚期卵巢癌仍是当前女性生殖系统恶性肿瘤中引起死亡的主要原因。腹腔温热化疗（IPHC）是一项很有希望的治疗措施,为提高晚期、复发和耐药患者的生活质量,改善患者预后提供了一种方法。对IPHC的药物代谢动力学及其在晚期及复发与耐药卵巢癌中的可行性、有效性、安全性进行综述。     

血小板增多与上皮性卵巢癌临床病理及生存预后的相关性研究

目的:研究术前血小板(PLT)与卵巢癌临床病理和预后的相关性。方法:回顾分析2009年1月至2013年3月于同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院行手术治疗的171例卵巢癌、218例卵巢良性上皮性肿瘤和59例交界性肿瘤患者的临床资料,分析PLT计数与患者年龄、病理类型、临床分期、细胞分级、CA125水平等临床病理因素之间的关系,同时分析比较卵巢癌伴或不伴PLT增多以及化疗后PLT变化对患者生存的影响。结果:卵巢癌患者术前PLT计数平均值为248.0×109/L,显著高于良性及交界性肿瘤(188.3×109/L和206.9×109/L,P0.0001)。171例卵巢癌患者中20例(11.7%)合并血小板增多(PLT≥350×109/L),卵巢癌合并PLT增多的患者中晚期比例高(P=0.030),更易发生大网膜(P=0.006)、腹膜(P=0.016)、膈下腹膜(P=0.018)转移,达到满意肿瘤减灭术比例较低(P=0.010)。卵巢癌患者的术前PLT与CA125值呈正相关(P=0.049)。患者术前PLT计数分别为≥232.2×109/L、208.5×109/L和327.5×109/L时,可依次最大程度预测卵巢癌减灭手术不满意、疾病处于晚期及总体预后不良。卵巢癌合并PLT增多及术前PLT与3周期化疗后PLT比值大于2的患者的生存时间明显缩短(P0.0001,P=0.006)。结论:卵巢癌患者术前PLT计数显著高于良性及交界性卵巢肿瘤。合并PLT增多的患者晚期肿瘤及多脏器转移比例显著增高,满意肿瘤减灭术比例低。PLT增多及化疗后PLT较术前显著下降是卵巢癌的不良预后指标。