Silent period in the mentalis muscle induced by facial nerve and cutaneous stimulation.

The aim of this study was to demonstrate that silent periods of the mentalis muscle are induced after facial nerve stimulation and cutaneous stimulation in normal subjects. When the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve and the cutaneous nerve in areas adjacent to the lower lip were stimulated during slight voluntary contraction of the mentalis muscle, silent periods were elicited with surface electrodes on the mentalis muscle. The early phase and the late phase of the silent period were elicited by marginal mandibular branch stimulation. The early phase of the silent period was recognized following the F waves and it disappeared at 36.3 msec. The average duration of the late phase of the silent period was 59.2 msec, with an average latency of 62.5 msec. Only the late phase of the silent period after cutaneous stimulation could be elicited, with a duration and latency of 55.9 msec and 54.0 msec respectively. The authors conclude that the silent period is able to be elicited in the mentalis muscle by peripheral nerve stimulation, and is one of the late responses in facial muscles.     

Blink reflex in patients with hemifacial spasm. Observations during microvascular decompression operations

The blink reflex cannot normally be elicited during surgical anesthesia using inhalation anesthetics. However, in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) the early component of the reflex response (R1) can be elicited on the affected side but not on the unaffected side during such anesthesia. The electromyographic (EMG) response from the mentalis muscle to stimulation of the supraorbital nerve was recorded during microvascular decompression (MVD) of the facial nerve to relieve HFS and compared to the response from the same muscle to stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve in four patients. During the operation before the facial nerve was decompressed, contractions in both the orbicularis oculi and the mentalis muscles could be elicited by stimulation of the supraorbital nerve (mean latencies 12.2 +/- 1.9 and 12.9 +/- 2.0 ms, respectively). When the facial nerve had been decompressed the blink reflex could no longer be elicited, and there was no response from the mentalis muscle to stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve. Compound action potentials (CAP) recorded from the 7th cranial nerve in response to stimulation of the supraorbital nerve had latencies of 7.5 ms +/- 1.4 ms to the negative peak.     

Trigemino-facial reflex inhibitory responses in some lower facial muscles

The effects of electrical trigeminal stimulation on activated facial muscles were studied in 20 normal subjects in order to evaluate whether excitatory or inhibitory responses are present and to investigate whether the reflex organization is similar in all the facial muscles. No inhibition was observed in frontalis, orbicularis oculi, orbicularis oris, and mentalis muscles. By contrast, a clear suppression of electromyographic (EMG) activity (late silent period or SP2) was present in the levator labii superioris, depressor anguli oris, and depressor labii inferioris muscles, with a mean latency ranging from 41.8 to 50.2 ms, and a mean duration ranging from 27.5 to 40.9 ms. An early suppression of EMG activity (early silent period or SP1) was observed, with a latency of 16 to 20 ms and a duration of 10 ms, mainly in inferior perioral muscles. Our findings show a selective trigeminal inhibitory influence upon some specific lower facial muscles.     

Motor potentials of inferior orbicularis oculi muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Comparison with responses to electrical peripheral stimulation of facial nerve.

Magnetic stimulation at the vertex evoked a motor potential (MP) in the inferior orbicularis oculi muscle of 10 healthy subjects with an onset latency of 8-13 msec. Its amplitude increased and its latency decreased when the muscle was contracted: the latency measured 9.5 +/- 1.3 msec with an intensity of stimulation 10-15% above threshold in the contracted muscle. This MP is secondary to excitation of the motor cortex. With the coil placed over the occipital scalp and the same stimulation intensity, an MP was recorded with an onset latency at 4.5 +/- 0.6 msec. This response reflects the activation of the facial nerve root. The peripheral electrical stimulation of the facial nerve at the mandible angle elicited an MP with an onset latency at 3.5 +/- 0.4 msec. Most records showed the presence of late components at about 30 msec for all types of stimulation.     

Cortical control of voluntary blinking: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cortical regions related to voluntary blinking. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the facial motor cortex (M1) and the midline frontal region (Fz) in 10 healthy subjects with eyes opened and closed. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the orbicularis oculi (OOC), orbicularis oris (OOR), abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior using surface and needle electromyography electrodes. Facial M waves and blink reflex were measured using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the facial and supraorbital nerves. RESULTS: TMS at Fz elicited 3 waves in OOC with no response in other tested muscles except for the early wave in OOR. Facial M1 stimulation produced only early and late waves. Because of their latencies, shapes, and relationship to coil position and stimulation intensity, early and late waves appeared to be analogous to the facial M wave and R1 component of the blink reflex. The intermediate wave at 6-8 ms latency was elicited in OOC by Fz stimulation with eyes closed. CONCLUSIONS: Since its latency matches the central conduction time of other cranial muscles and it has characteristic of muscle activation-related facilitation, the intermediate wave is presumably related to cortical stimulation. This result provides evidence that the cortical center for the upper facial movements, including blinking, is not principally located in the facial M1, but rather in the mesial frontal region.     

Intracranial stimulation of facial nerve in humans with the magnetic coil

Using ourselves as subjects, maximal compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) were evoked in ipsilateral nasal and orbicularis oculi muscles (onset latency 4.9-5.4 msec) by a magnetic coil (MC) tangentially oriented over parieto-occipital scalp. The facial nerve was also electrically stimulated sequentially at the posterior tragus near the stylomastoid foramen, anterior tragus and 3 cm more distally. Onset latency of the CMAP elicited at posterior tragus ranged from 1.0 to 1.3 msec less than that elicited by the MC over scalp. Because the measured distal facial nerve motor conduction velocity was 50-60 m/sec, the locus of impulse generation induced by magnetic coil stimulation was estimated to be approximately 6.5 cm proximal to the site of electrical stimulation at the posterior tragus, i.e., closer to the exit of the facial nerve from the brain-stem than to its entrance into the internal auditory meatus. This non-invasive technique should be useful in evaluating patients with peripheral facial nerve disorders including Bell's palsy.     

The relations between long-latency reflexes in hand muscles, somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial stimulation of motor tracts

In 15 normal subjects the latency of electrically elicited long-latency reflexes (LLRs) of thenar muscles was compared with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after median nerve stimulation and with the latencies of thenar muscle potentials after transcranial stimulation (TCS) of the motor cortex. Assuming a transcortical reflex pathway the intracortical relay time for the LLR was calculated to be 10.4 +/- 1.9 msec (mean +/- S.D.) or 8.1 +/- 1.6 msec depending on the experimental conditions. The duration of the cortical relay time is not correlated with the peripheral or central conduction times, with body size or arm length. If the LLRs of hand muscles are conducted transcortically the long duration of the cortical relay time suggests a polysynaptic pathway.     

Neurophysiologic markers in laryngeal muscles indicate functional anatomy of laryngeal primary motor cortex and premotor cortex in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify neurophysiologic markers generated by primary motor and premotor cortex for laryngeal muscles, recorded from laryngeal muscle.MethodsTen right-handed healthy subjects underwent navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and 18 patients underwent direct cortical stimulation (DCS) over the left hemisphere, while recording neurophysiologic markers, short latency response (SLR) and long latency response (LLR) from cricothyroid muscle. Both healthy subjects and patients were engaged in the visual object-naming task. In healthy subjects, the stimulation was time-locked at 10–300 ms after picture presentation while in the patients it was at zero time.ResultsThe latency of SLR in healthy subjects was 12.66 ± 1.09 ms and in patients 12.67 ± 1.23 ms. The latency of LLR in healthy subjects was 58.5 ± 5.9 ms, while in patients 54.25 ± 3.69 ms. SLR elicited by the stimulation of M1 for laryngeal muscles corresponded to induced dysarthria, while LLR elicited by stimulation of the premotor cortex in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus, recorded from laryngeal muscle, corresponded to speech arrest in patients and speech arrest and/or language disturbances in healthy subjects.ConclusionIn both groups, SLR indicated location of M1 for laryngeal muscles, and LLR location of premotor cortex in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus, recorded from laryngeal muscle, while stimulation of these areas in the dominant hemisphere induced transient speech disruptions.SignificanceDescribed methodology can be used in preoperative mapping, and it is expected to facilitate surgical planning and intraoperative mapping, preserving these areas from injuries.     

Lateral spread response elicited by double stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm

In patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS), a lateral spread response (or abnormal muscle response) is recorded from facial muscles after facial nerve stimulation. The origin of this response is not completely understood. We studied the lateral spread responses elicited by double stimulation in 12 patients with HFS during microvascular decompression. The response was recorded from the mentalis muscle by electrical stimulation of the temporal branch of the facial nerve or from the orbicularis oculi muscles by stimulation of the marginal mandibular branch. The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of double stimulation ranged from 0.5 to 7.0 ms. R1 was defined as the response elicited by the first stimulus, and R2 as the response elicited by the second stimulus. R1 had a constant latency and amplitude regardless of the ISI, whereas R2 appeared after a fixed refractory period without facilitation or depression in a recovery curve of latency and amplitude. From these findings, we consider that the lateral spread response is due to cross-transmission of facial nerve fibers at the site of vascular compression rather than arising from facial nerve motor neurons.     

Cortical mechanisms mediating the inhibitory period after magnetic stimulation of the facial motor area

We studied the silent period (SP) that interrupts voluntary electromyographic activity (EMG) in facial muscles, after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in normal subjects. High-intensity magnetic stimulation with a 12-cm round coil centered at the vertex induced a long-lasting SP (215 ms), whereas supramaximal stimulation of the facial nerve only induced a short (< 20 ms) and incomplete EMG suppression, and cutaneous stimuli had no inhibitory effect at all. Cutaneous trigeminal stimulation delivered after TMS evoked blink-like reflexes, showing that facial motoneurons were not inhibited during the SP. Simultaneous recordings from perioral muscles (large cortical representation) and from orbicularis oculi and masseter muscles (small cortical representation) showed SPs of identical duration. Focal stimuli with a figure-of-eight coil showed that positioning of the coil was critical and that the optimal scalp sites for evoking the largest motor potentials and longest SPs coincided. Low-intensity stimulation occasionally elicited short SPs without a preceding motor potential. We conclude that the SP induced in facial muscles by TMS results from the excitation of cortical inhibitory interneurons surrounding the upper motoneurons. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve, 20, 418–424, 1997.     

Evaluation of proximal facial nerve conduction by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

A magnetic stimulator was used for direct transcutaneous stimulation of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve in 15 normal subjects and in patients with Bell's palsy, demyelinating neuropathy, traumatic facial palsy and pontine glioma. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) thus elicited in the orbicularis oris muscle of controls were of similar amplitude but longer latency (1.3 SD 0.15 ms) compared with CMAPs produced by conventional electrical stimulation at the stylomastoid foramen. No response to magnetic stimulation could be recorded from the affected side in 15 of 16 patients with Bell's palsy. Serial studies in two patients demonstrated that the facial nerve remained inexcitable by magnetic stimulation despite marked improvement in clinical function. In the patient with a pontine glioma, the CMAP elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation was of low amplitude but normal latency. In six of seven patients with demyelinating neuropathy, the response to intracranial magnetic stimulation was significantly delayed. Magnetic stimulation produced no response in either patient with traumatic facial palsy. Although the precise site of facial nerve stimulation is uncertain, evidence points to the labyrinthine segment of the facial canal as the most likely location.     

Trigeminal sensory input elicited by electric or magnetic stimulation interferes with the central motor drive to the intrinsic hand muscles.

In 6 normal subjects, unilateral supraorbital magnetic or electric stimulation resulted in a consistent symmetrical inhibition of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the relaxed and preactivated first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle. A supraorbital stimulus caused a significant reduction in amplitude when the trigeminal CS was given 30 to 65 ms before transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In addition, supraorbital magnetic stimulation induced a bilateral EMG suppression of the isometrically contracting FDI muscles, starting about 40 to 50 ms after the magnetic stimulus. In 4 subjects, MEPs evoked by transcranial electric stimulation or by TMS during slight muscle contraction showed a comparable trigeminomotor inhibition. These findings demonstrate that electromagnetic stimulation of trigeminal afferents interferes with the motor output to the intrinsic hand muscles inducing a bilateral inhibition which is probably mediated by a multisynaptic subcortical network. In all 6 subjects, TMS over the motor hand area or the cerebellum elicited a reproducible blink reflex. Since the blink reflex is a sensitive indicator of trigeminal excitation, one has to assume that TMS is associated with a significant excitation of trigeminal afferents. Therefore, trigeminomotor inhibition has to be considered in all TMS studies that use a conditioning-test design.     

Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: In transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, the optimal orientation of the coil on the scalp is dependent on the muscle under investigation, but not yet known for facial muscles. METHODS: Using a figure-of-eight coil, we compared TMS induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from eight different coil orientations when recording from ipsi- and contralateral nasalis muscle. RESULTS: The MEPs from nasalis muscle revealed three components: The major ipsi- and contra-lateral middle latency responses of approximately 10 ms onset latency proved entirely dependent on voluntary pre-innervation. They were most easily obtained from a coil orientation with posterior inducing current direction, and in this respect resembled the intrinsic hand rather than the masseter muscles. Early short duration responses of around 6 ms onset latency were best elicited with an antero-lateral current direction and not pre-innervation dependent, and therefore most probably due to stimulation of the nerve roots. Late responses (>18 ms) could inconsistently be elicited with posterior coil orientations in pre-innervated condition. CONCLUSIONS: By using the appropriate coil orientation and both conditions relaxed and pre-innervated, cortically evoked MEP responses from nasalis muscle can reliably be separated from peripheral and reflex components and also from cross talk of masseter muscle activation.     

Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in normal human subjects

It has been shown that in patients in whom the central stump of the hypoglossal nerve has been anastomosed to the peripheral stump of a lesioned facial nerve, supraorbital nerve stimulation can elicit a short-latency reflex (12.5±0.6 ms; mean±S.D.) in facial muscles similar to the R1 disynaptic blink reflex response, but not followed by an R2 blink reflex component⁴⁶. Thus in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, these hypoglossal nerves contribute to a trigemino-hypoglossal reflex. The aim of this work was to study the type of reflex activities which can be elicited in both facial and tongue muscles by electrical stimulation of cutaneous (supraorbital nerve) or mucosal (lingual nerve) trigeminal (V) afferents in normal subjects. The results show that although stimulation of cutaneous V1 afferents elicits the well-known double component (R1–R2) blink reflex response in the orbicularis oculi muscles, it does not produce any detectable reflex response in the genioglossus muscle, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. Conversely, stimulation of mucosal V3 afferents can elicit a single reflex response of the R1 type in the genioglossus muscle but not in the orbicularis oculi muscles, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. These data are discussed in terms of two similar but separate circuits for the R1 responses of cutaneous (blink reflex) and mucosal (tongue reflex) origins. They suggest that in patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII–VII) nerve anastomosis, the short-latency trigemino-‘hypoglossal-facial' reflex of the R1 blink reflex type observed in facial muscles following supraorbital nerve stimulation could be due to changes in synaptic effectiveness of the central connectivity within the principal trigeminal nucleus where both cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents project.     

Investigation of facial motor pathways by electrical and magnetic stimulation: sites and mechanisms of excitation.

A refined technique is described for non invasive examination of the facial motor pathways by stimulation of the extra- and intracranial segment of the facial nerve and the facial motor cortex. Surface recordings from the nasalis muscle rather than from the orbicularis oris muscle were used, since the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from this muscle showed a more clearly defined onset. Electrical extracranial stimulation of the facial nerve at the stylomastoid fossa in 14 healthy subjects yielded a mean distal motor latency of 3.7 ms (SD 0.46), comparable with reported latencies to the orbicularis oris muscle. Using a magnetic stimulator, transcranial stimulation of the facial nerve was performed. The mechanism of transcranial magnetic facial nerve stimulation was studied using recordings on 12 patients who had facial nerve lesions at different locations, and with intraoperative direct measurements in four patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery. The actual site of stimulation could be localised to the proximal part of the facial canal, and a mean "transosseal conduction time" of 1.2 ms (SD 0.18) was calculated. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) played an important role in mediating the magnetically induced stimulating currents. Finally, with transcranial magnetic stimulation of the facial motor cortex, clearly discernible CMAPs could be produced when voluntary activation of several facial muscles was used to facilitate the responses. From this, a central motor conduction time of 5.1 ms was calculated (SD 0.60, 6 subjects).     

Abnormal muscle responses in hemifacial spasm: F waves or trigeminal reflexes?

OBJECTIVE: In patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS), abnormal muscle responses (AMR) are frequently present. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the afferent input of AMR is mediated by antidromic facial nerve stimulation or orthodromic trigeminal nerve stimulation. METHODS: AMR in the orbicularis oris muscle were recorded in 28 patients with HFS. When AMR were present, they were recorded after subthreshold stimulation of the facial nerve and weak stimulation delivered to the skin. RESULTS: AMR were recordable in 24 (86%) of the patients, and usually consisted of the early constant component (mean onset latency, 10.0 ms) and late variable component (35.3 ms), similar to R1 and R2 of the blink reflex. The early or late components of AMR, or both, were frequently elicited after subthreshold stimulation of the facial nerve (43%) and skin stimulation (88%). CONCLUSIONS: AMR are likely to be mediated by trigeminal afferent inputs, rather than antidromic activation of the facial nerve, and are a type of trigeminal reflex.     

The silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in muscles supplied by cranial nerves: normal data and changes in patients.

The silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the sensorimotor cortex (Magstim 200, figure of eight coil, loop diameter 7 cm) in active muscles supplied by cranial nerves (mentalis, sternocleidomastoid, and genioglossus) was studied in 14 control subjects and nine patients with localised lesions of the sensorimotor cortex. In the patients, measurements of the silent period were also made in the first dorsal interosseus and tibialis anterior muscles. In the controls, there was a silent period in contralateral as well as ipsilateral cranial muscle and the duration of the silent period increased with increasing stimulus intensities. The mean duration of the silent period was around 140 ms in contralateral mentalis muscle and around 90 ms in contralateral sternocleidomastoid muscle at 1.2 x threshold stimulation strengths. Whereas the duration of the silent period in ipsilateral mentalis muscle was shorter than on the contralateral side it was similar on both sides in sternocleidomastoid muscle. In patients with focal lesions of the face associated primary motor cortex and corresponding central facial paresis, the silent period in mentalis muscle was shortened whereas it was unchanged or prolonged in limb muscles (first dorsal interosseus, tibialis anterior) with stimulation over the affected hemisphere. By contrast, in a patient with a lesion within the parietal cortex, the silent period in mentalis muscle was prolonged with stimulation of the affected side.     

Mentalis muscle related reflexes

The mentalis muscle (MM) arises from the incisive fossa of the mandible, raises and protrudes the lower lip. Here, we aim to characterize responses obtained from MM by supraorbital and median electrical as well as auditory stimuli in a group of 16 healthy volunteers who did not have clinical palmomental reflex. Reflex activities were recorded from the MM and orbicularis oculi (O.oc) after supraorbital and median electrical as well as auditory stimuli. Response rates over MM were consistent after each stimulus, however, mean latencies of MM response were longer than O.oc responses by all stimulation modalities. Shapes and amplitudes of responses from O.oc and MM were similar. Based on our findings, we may say that MM motoneurons have connections with trigeminal, vestibulocochlear and lemniscal pathways similar to other facial muscles and electrophysiological recording of MM responses after electrical and auditory stimulation is possible in healthy subjects.     

The origin of the soleus late response evoked by magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex elicits a primary motor evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle at a latency of ∼ 30 msec, which may be followed by a late potential with a variable latency of 80–120 msec (soleus late response, SLR). While the MEP is thought to arise from stimulation of the corticospinal tract, the origin of the SLR is uncertain. In the present study we have investigated the properties of the SLR in order to elucidate its origin. An SLR was evoked at a latency of 100–120 msec in 5 out of 10 normal subjects in the relaxed state and at a latency of ∼ 100 msec in all subjects when tibialis anterior (TA) was slightly facilitated. The SLR was largest with 5–10% TA contraction, decreased in size with increasing levels of TA contraction and was negligible in all subjects when the foot was immobilised. The latency of the SLR fell by 23 msec when the foot was passively dorsiflexed 20°. A similar response to the SLR, at a latency of 77 msec, was present in all subjects following electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve. Our findings suggest that the SLR is a soleus stretch reflex resulting from dorsiflexion of the foot due to preferential activation of TA following cortical stimulation.     

F-waves and facilitated late responses of the mentalis muscle in patients with a cerebrovascular accident

F-waves in the extremities result from the backfiring of antidromically activated anterior horn cells and F-waves of the mentalis muscle can be also elicited after stimulation of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. In order to investigate the influence of the descending pathway of the excitability of the facial motonucleus, the F-wave of the mentalis muscle and the facilitated late response, which follows F-waves and which seems to be the snout reflex due to their similar latency and habituation, were studied in 11 conscious patients with a hemispheric cerebrovascular accident (CVA) presenting with hemiparesis, and in 10 unconscious patients with CVA or head injury. The duration and the persistence of the F-waves increased significantly statistically on the normal side in the CVA patients compared with those of the palsy side and the normal subjects. In comatose patients the F-waves and the facilitated late response were not elicited. The latency (46.1 +/- 13.3 msec) of the facilitated late responses in the unconscious patients tended to increase compared with the latency (36.6 +/- 4.3 msec) in the conscious patients. These findings suggest that the hyperexcitability of the facial motoneuron is ipsilateral to any hemispheric lesion; the hemispheric lesion exerts a bilateral excitatory influence on the interneuron of the facilitated late response: and that the reticular formation may influence the facial motoneuron and any interneurons concerned in the facilitated late response. F-waves and facilitated late responses should be further examined as neurophysiologically useful diagnostic methods.