Common peroneal nerve injuries

The authors report their experience in the treatment of common peroneal nerve (CPN) injuries using a one-stage procedure of nerve repair and tibialis posterior tendon transfer. A series of 45 patients with traumatic injury and graft repair of the CPN is presented. From 1988 to 1991, the six patients elected for surgery had only nerve repair: five ultimately did not recover, while muscle contraction in the remaining patient was graded M1-2. Since 1991, nerve surgery in our clinic was associated with tendon transfer procedures (39 cases) which were followed by a satisfactory reinnervation rate. Nerve transection and iatrogenic injuries, torsion/dislocation of the knee, complex biosseous fractures of the leg, and gunshot wounds showed excellent to fair results in decreasing order: in nerve sections, muscle recovery scored M3 or M4+ in all the patients, and in nerve ruptures due to severe dislocation of the knee, it was M3 or M4+ in 85% of cases. The association of microsurgical nerve repair and tendon transfer has changed the course of CPN injuries.     

Common peroneal nerve injuries in knee dislocations: results with one-stage nerve repair and tibialis posterior tendon transfer

We report our experience in the treatment of common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy following knee dislocations: a twelve-year surgical series of 26 patients presenting with a traumatic injury of the lateral sciatic nerve and no spontaneous recovery is reviewed. From 1988 to 1991, we performed nerve surgery alone on 3 patients. Their results were highly disappointing and in none did we observe muscle recovery. Since 1991 nerve surgery was associated with a palliative procedure for 23 patients. Although at surgical exploration, severe nerve damage was found in 87% of these patients (thereby indicating the need for graft repair), the overall outcome was good, with a score of M3 on the BMRC scale in about 75% of the cases. These results suggest that the one-stage association of microsurgical nerve repair and tibialis posterior tendon transfer changed the destiny of these injuries. Received: 10 December 2001/Accepted: 14 February 2002     

Surgical treatment of common peroneal nerve injuries: indications and results. A series of 62 cases

AIM: Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injuries represent the most common nerve lesions of the lower limb and can be due to several causative mechanisms. Although in most cases they recover spontaneously, an irreversible damage of the nerve is also likely to occur. Nerve regeneration following CPN repair is poorer if compared to other peripheral nerves and this can explain the reluctant attitude of many physicians towards the surgical treatment of these patients. Among the several factors advocated to explain the poor outcome following surgery, it has been suggested that reinnervation might be obstacled by the force imbalance between the functioning flexors and the paralysed extensors that eventually results in the fixed equinism of the foot, due to the excessive contracture of the active muscles and the shortening of the heel cord. Therefore the early correction of these forces might favour nerve regeneration. Following such hypothesis, the authors treat irreversible CPN injuries performing a one-stage procedure of nerve repair and tibialis tendon transfer. We report our experience, describing the indications to surgical treatment, the operative technique and the postoperative clinical outcome correlated with the causative mechanisms of the injuries. METHODS: A 62-patient series controlled over a period of 15 years with a post-traumatic palsy of the CPN is reported. All the patients underwent surgery. In open wounds, when a nerve transection was suspected, surgery was performed at emergency (2 cases). In closed injuries, operative treatment was advised when no spontaneous regeneration occurred 3-4 months after the injury. From 1988 till 1991, 9 patients were elected for surgery : in 6 cases treatment consisted of neuroma resection and nerve repair by means of a graft. In 3 patients it was performed only a CPN decompression at the fibular neck. Since 1991, surgical treatment has always consisted of nerve repair associated with a tendon transfer during the same procedure. Fifty-three patients were elected for surgery. Nerve repair was achieved by direct suture in 1 case and by means of a graft in 46 patients. Decompression of the CPN at the fibular neck was performed in 6 patients where nerve continuity was demonstrated. RESULTS: In the first group of patients, nerve repair outcome was highly disapponting: no recovery in 5 cases, reinnervation occurred in 1 patient only (M1-2). CPN decompression was followed by complete recovery in 2 cases, no improvement was observed in 1 case. Nerve repair associated with tibialis tendon transfer dramatically improved the postoperative outcome: at 2 year follow-up, neural regeneration was demonstrated in 90% of the patients. Surgical outcome depends on the causative mechanisms of the lesion: sharp injuries and severe dislocations of the knee had an excellent recovery, while in crush injuries and gunshot wounds good recovery was less common. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of CPN injuries can nowadays be highly rewarding. CPN palsies in open wounds should undergo surgical exploration at emergency. In close injuries with no spontaneous recovery within 4 months after the injury, patients should be advised to seek surgical treatment regardless the causative mechanism of the lesion. According to our experience, the association of a transfer procedure to nerve repair enhances neural regeneration, dramatically improving the surgical outcome of these injuries.     

Contralateral motor rootlets and ipsilateral nerve transfers in brachial plexus reconstruction

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with brachial plexus avulsion injuries who underwent contralateral motor rootlet and ipsilateral nerve transfers to reconstruct shoulder abduction/external rotation and elbow flexion. METHODS: Within 6 months after the injury, 24 patients with a mean age of 21 years underwent surgery in which the contralateral C-7 motor rootlet was transferred to the suprascapular nerve by using sural nerve grafts. The biceps motor branch or the musculocutaneous nerve was repaired either by an ulnar nerve fascicular transfer or by transfer of the 11th cranial nerve or the phrenic nerve. The mean recovery in abduction was 90 degrees and 92 degrees in external rotation. In cases of total palsy, only two patients recovered external rotation and in those cases mean external rotation was 70 degrees. Elbow flexion was achieved in all cases. In cases of ulnar nerve transfer, the muscle scores were M5 in one patient, M4 in six patients, and M3+ in five patients. Elbow flexion repair involving the use of the 11th cranial nerve resulted in a score of M3+ in five patients and M4 in two patients. After surgery involving the phrenic nerve, two patients received a score of M3 + and two a score of M4. Results were clearly better in patients with partial lesions and in those who were shorter than 170 cm (p < 0.01). The length of the graft used in motor rootlet transfers affected only the recovery of external rotation. There was no permanent injury at the donor sites. CONCLUSIONS: Motor rootlet transfer represents a reliable and potent neurotizer that allows the reconstruction of abduction and external rotation in partial injuries.     

Functional results after posterior interosseous nerve microsurgical repair

Background

The posterior interosseous nerve is one of the terminal branches of the radial nerve, and its motor function is very important for finger extension. Its repair success can be ascertained by the recovery of this motor function. Early surgical exploration is advocated in open injuries, and there is still some controversy regarding the appropriate approach in closed injuries. Tendon transfer is only performed in neglected cases and in cases with poor functional outcome after nerve repair.

Patients and methods

Consent was taken from 23 patients suffering from posterior interosseous nerve injury from January 2005 to December 2012. Eighteen patients had undergone end-to-end repair of the posterior interosseous nerve by epineurial repair, and five patients were treated by sural nerve graft using an operating microscope.

Results

There were 19 males and 4 females. The mean age was 25 years old with a range of 16–45 years; there were 16 injuries on the right side and 7 on the left side. The mean follow-up period was 12 months with range from 10 to 36 months. All patients had satisfactory results except for two cases that necessitated tendon transfer surgery. In 21 of the 23 patients, the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) extension power was measured at M4–M5. The thumb opening angle was measured between 55° and 70° in 19 patients. According to the modified Verga classification scores, there were 19 excellent cases, 2 good and 2 poor results. The primarily repaired posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injuries had better muscle recovery than the grafted nerves.

Conclusions

The posterior interosseous nerve repairs, if done using end-to-end anastomosis or a nerve graft and with the appropriate technique, may result to nearly full recovery in young patients. Nerve repair is suggested until the 6th month after the injury using end-to-end anastomosis or grafting methods.

Level of clinical evidence

Level 4, case series study     

Surgical outcomes following nerve transfers in upper brachial plexus injuries

Background:

Brachial plexus injuries represent devastating injuries with a poor prognosis. Neurolysis, nerve repair, nerve grafts, nerve transfer, functioning free-muscle transfer and pedicle muscle transfer are the main surgical procedures for treating these injuries. Among these, nerve transfer or neurotization is mainly indicated in root avulsion injury.

Materials and Methods:

We analysed the results of various neurotization techniques in 20 patients (age group 20-41 years, mean 25.7 years) in terms of denervation time, recovery time and functional results. The inclusion criteria for the study included irreparable injuries to the upper roots of brachial plexus (C5, C6 and C7 roots in various combinations), surgery within 10 months of injury and a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. The average denervation period was 4.2 months. Shoulder functions were restored by transfer of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve (19 patients), and phrenic nerve to suprascapular nerve (1 patient). In 11 patients, axillary nerve was also neurotized using different donors - radial nerve branch to the long head triceps (7 patients), intercostal nerves (2 patients), and phrenic nerve with nerve graft (2 patients). Elbow flexion was restored by transfer of ulnar nerve motor fascicle to the motor branch of biceps (4 patients), both ulnar and median nerve motor fascicles to the biceps and brachialis motor nerves (10 patients), spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening sural nerve graft (1 patient), intercostal nerves (3rd, 4th and 5th) to musculocutaneous nerve (4 patients) and phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening graft (1 patient).

Results:

Motor and sensory recovery was assessed according to Medical Research Council (MRC) Scoring system. In shoulder abduction, five patients scored M4 and three patients M3+. Fair results were obtained in remaining 12 patients. The achieved abduction averaged 95 degrees (range, 50 - 170 degrees). Eight patients scored M4 power in elbow flexion and assessed as excellent results. Good results (M3+) were obtained in seven patients. Five patients had fair results (M2+ to M3).     

儿童桡神经损伤78例分析

目的讨论儿童桡神经损伤的临床特点和治疗方法。方法对７８例儿童桡神经损伤的临床资料进行总结和分析。伤因：６６例为上肢骨折或脱位时合并神经损伤，其中肱骨下段骨折７例，肱骨髁上骨折３７例，孟氏骨折或单纯桡骨头脱位１８例，尺骨和／或桡骨骨折４例。１２例为单纯神经损伤。采用手法复位、石膏固定或牵引１８例，神经松解术３８例，神经吻合术２０例，肌腱转移功能重建术２例。结果４２例随访２个月～２６年，平均４年２个月。用Ｈｉｇｈｅｔ运动评定法评定，疗效为优者３４例，优良率达８１％。伤后３个月内治疗者优良率占９６．５％，明显优于伤后６个月处理者的５０％。结论儿童上肢骨折脱位易合并桡神经损伤，对开放性骨折合并桡神经损伤者应尽快手术治疗。闭合性损伤在保守治疗１～３个月后功能无恢复时应考虑手术治疗     

Transfer of the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve in brachial plexus reconstruction

PURPOSE: Transfer of the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve is a common procedure, performed to reestablish shoulder motion in patients with brachial plexus palsy. We propose dissecting both nerves via a distal oblique supraclavicular incision, which can be prolonged up to the scapular notch. The results of the transfer to the suprascapular nerve are compared with those of the combined repair of the suprascapular and axillary nerves. METHODS: Thirty men between the ages of 18 and 37 years with brachial plexus trauma had reparative surgery within 3 to 10 months of their injuries. In partial injuries with a normal triceps, a triceps motor branch transfer to the axillary nerve was performed. The suprascapular and accessory nerves were dissected via an oblique incision, extending from the point at which the plexus crosses the clavicle to the anterior border of the trapezius muscle. In 10 patients with fractures or dislocations of the clavicle, the trapezius muscle was partially elevated to expose the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. RESULTS: In all cases, transfer of the accessory to the suprascapular nerve was performed without the need for nerve grafts. A double lesion of the suprascapular nerve was identified in 1 patient with clavicular dislocation. In those with total palsy, the average improvement in range of abduction was 45 degrees , but none of the patients with total palsy recovered any active external rotation. Patients with upper-type injury recovered an average of 105 degrees of abduction and external rotation. If only patients with C5-C6 injuries were considered, the range of abduction and external rotation increased to 122 degrees and 118 degrees , respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the accessory nerve for transfer to the suprascapular nerve ensured adequate return of shoulder function, especially when combined with a triceps motor branch transfer to the axillary nerve. The supraclavicular exposure proposed here for the suprascapular and accessory nerves is advantageous and can be extended easily to explore the suprascapular nerve at the scapular notch.     

Axillary nerve repair by triceps motor branch transfer through an axillary access: anatomical basis and clinical results

OBJECT: Grafting or nerve transfers to the axillary nerve have been performed using a deltopectoral approach and/or a posterior arm approach. In this report, the surgical anatomy of the axillary nerve was studied with the goal of repairing the nerve through an axillary access. METHODS: The axillary nerve was bilaterally dissected in 10 embalmed cadavers to study its variations. Three patients with axillary nerve injuries then underwent surgical repair through an axillary access; the axillary nerve was repaired by transfer of the triceps long head motor branch. RESULTS: At the lateral margin of the subscapularis muscle, the axillary nerve was found in the center of a triangle bounded medially by the subscapular artery, laterally by the latissimus dorsi tendon, and cephalad by the posterior circumflex humeral artery. At the entrance of the quadrangular space, the axillary nerve divisions were loosely connected to each other, and could be clearly separated and correctly identified. Surgery for the axillary nerve repair through the axillary access was straightforward. Eighteen months after surgery, all three patients had recovered deltoid strength to a score of M4 on the Medical Research Council scale and had improved abduction strength by 50%. No deficit was evident in elbow extension. CONCLUSIONS: The axillary nerve and its branches can be safely dissected and repaired by triceps motor nerve transfer through an axillary access.     

Sural nerve autografts for high radial nerve injury with nine centimeter or greater defects

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present the outcome of sural nerve grafting that focuses on motor fascicles in 6 patients with high radial nerve injuries with defects of more than 9 cm. METHODS: Six patients with a high radial nerve complete injury were treated with a sural nerve autograft during a 6-year interval from June 1994 to June 2000. The gap of the radial nerve, which was measured in the surgical field, was 9 cm in 1 patient, 10 cm in 4 patients, and 11 cm in 1 patient. There were 4 men and 2 women with an average age of 32 years (range, 14-49 years). The causes of the injuries were a fracture of the humerus in 4 patients and surgery-related complications in 2 patients. Two or 3 multiple interfascicular nerve autografts of the sural nerve were sutured to the areas that have motor fascicles dominantly. The average delay from the injury to surgery was 6 months (range, 0.5-12 months), and the average duration of the follow-up after surgery was 48 months. RESULTS: The overall motor recovery was M5 in 2 patients, M4 in 3 patients, and M2 in 1 patient. The overall sensory recovery was S3+ in 2 patients, S3 in 3 patients, and S1 in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, good to excellent motor recovery can be expected in 83% of patients who have a large gap of the radial nerve when sural nerve autografts are sutured to the areas that have motor fascicles dominantly. Even for large gaps, within 8 months, an attempt at nerve reconstruction before proceeding to tendon transfers appears to be indicated. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.     

Successful management of foot drop by nerve transfers to the deep peroneal nerve

Traumatic damage to the common peroneal nerve due to sharp injury, gunshot wound, sciatic nerve tumor, radiculopathy, or hip replacement surgery may result in foot drop. We present an alternative strategy for reanimation of foot drop following deep peroneal nerve palsy, successfully restoring voluntary movement. Fourteen consecutive patients with deep peroneal nerve injuries resulting in foot drop underwent nerve transfer of functional fascicles of either the superficial peroneal nerve or of the tibial nerve as donor for deep peroneal-innervated muscle groups. Eleven cases had successful restoration of British motor grade 3+ to 4+/5 ankle dorsiflexion, one case had restoration of grade 3 ankle dorsiflexion, and two cases had no restoration of dorsiflexion. Nerve transfer to the deep peroneal nerve is a feasible and effective method of treating deep peroneal nerve injuries of less than 1-year duration.     

Repair of the femoral nerve by two motor branches of the obturator nerve: A case report

Complete femoral nerve palsies are uncommon but devastating injuries when they are caused by large nerve defects. Direct repair is usually not possible and nerve grafting renders uncertain outcomes. Recent studies proposed different peripheral nerve transfers as treatment strategies for large femoral nerve defects. We report a clinical application of a nerve transfer to reinnervate the quadriceps muscle with two motor branches of the obturator nerve in a 48 years-old man that was diagnosed with a femoral nerve palsy after resection of a retroperitoneal schwannoma. The branches supplying the gracilis and adductor longus muscles were transferred to the motor branch of the femoral nerve to the quadriceps muscle at 6 months postinjury. At 34 months of follow-up, knee extension was quoted M4. The presented nerve transfer may be feasible, technically simple, and renders good functional outcomes.     

Distal anterior interosseous nerve transfer to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries

Proximal ulnar nerve injuries can result in loss of intrinsic muscle function of the hand, and distal nerve transfers provide nerve coaptation close to the target muscle. This retrospective chart review evaluated patient outcome following a distal nerve transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve. There were eight patient charts reviewed, three women, and five men. The mean patient age was 38 years (standard deviation: 22 years). The mean time from injury to surgery was 3 months (standard deviation: 3 months), and mean postoperative follow-up time was 18 months (standard deviation: 11 months). All patients had reinnervation of the ulnar nerve intrinsic hand muscles with improved postoperative lateral pinch and grip strength. One patient had a secondary tendon transfer. No functional deficit in performing tasks in pronation was reported. The distal nerve transfer of the AIN to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve provides good reinnervation of the ulnar-nerve-innervated intrinsic muscles of the hand.     

手术治疗创伤致神经源性单纯肩外展功能障碍

 目的 探讨手术治疗肩部创伤致肩胛上神经与腋神经同时损伤的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2003年7月至2011年9月,手术治疗13例男性肩部创伤后诊断为肩胛上神经与腋神经同时损伤的患者资料,年龄8~59岁,平均28 岁;受伤至手术时间为2~7个月,平均3.7个月。其中肩胛颈和锁骨同时骨折2例,浮肩损伤3例,肱骨颈及关节盂骨折1例,锁骨骨折3例,肩峰骨折1例,肩胛骨骨折2例,寰枢椎骨折1例。13例临床检查均示单纯肩外展、外旋功能完全丧失,三角肌及冈上、下肌肌力均为0级。电生理检查示腋神经、肩胛上神经完全失神经支配。肩胛上神经断裂10例,其中6例通过1股腓肠神经移植修复,1例通过1股颈丛浅支移植修复,3例因远端撕脱而放弃神经修复;另3例肩胛上神经仅进行松解。腋神经断裂12例,其中10例采用2~3股腓肠神经移植修复,2例采用正中神经束支移位修复;另1例腋神经于四边孔处进行松解。13例患者中,10例患者的肩胛上神经及腋神经同时断裂。结果 13例患者随访时间36~134个月,平均85个月;7例肩关节上举恢复正常达180°,该7例的三角肌力均为4级,肩外旋40°~70°,平均56°;5例肩外展达30°~50°,平均38°;该5例肩外旋为-40°~30°,平均10°,三角肌肌力4级1例,3级2例,2级2例;另1例无恢复。结论 对于肩部创伤后出现的单纯肩关节外展、外旋功能完全丧失,应考虑肩胛上神经与腋神经同时损伤的可能。此种类型的神经损伤修复后的效果满意,应尽早进行神经移植修复。     

Median nerve as free tendon graft

Four patients are described, all of whom had tendon injuries in which the median nerve was used as a free tendon graft. Three cases involved the repair of a flexor tendon injury, and one the repair of an extensor tendon. In all cases, reconstruction of the median nerve was performed with a free sural nerve graft. The difficulty was that the palmaris longus tendon was missing in all cases. The importance of preoperative clinical testing for the presence of the palmaris longus tendon is emphasized.     

Reconstruction of C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury by multiple nerve transfers: spinal accessory to suprascapular, ulnar fascicles to biceps branch, and triceps long or lateral head branch to axillary nerve

PURPOSE: In C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion lesions, elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation are the functions that need to be restored. Because the proximal stumps are not available for grafting, surgical repair is based on nerve transfers. The purpose of this study was to describe and report the results of the use of multiple nerve transfers in the reconstruction of these avulsion injuries. METHODS: Ten patients had multiple nerve transfers: cranial nerve XI to the suprascapular nerve, ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps motor branch, and triceps long or lateral head motor branch to the axillary nerve. Triceps branch transfer was performed through a posterior arm incision. RESULTS: Two years after surgery, all the patients had recovered full elbow flexion; 7 scored M4 and 3 scored M3+ according to Medical Research Council scoring. All the patients had recovered active abduction and external rotation. Abduction recovery averaged 92 degrees (range, 65 degrees-120 degrees) and external rotation, measured from full internal rotation, averaged 93 degrees (range, 80 degrees-120 degrees). Shoulder abduction strength was graded M4 in 3 patients and M3 in the remaining 7 patients. Shoulder external rotation strength was graded M4 in 2 patients, M3 in 5 patients, and M2 in 3 patients. No donor site deficits were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nerve transfers constitute a valid strategy in C5-C6 avulsion injury reconstruction.     

儿童习惯性髌骨脱位的手术治疗

目的 探讨治疗儿童习惯性髌骨脱位的手术方法。方法 习惯性髌骨脱位患者３６例,平均年龄９．１岁;采用复合性软组织手术的方法对其中４５个髌骨脱位进行治疗;手术方法包括膝外侧软组织广泛松解,股外侧肌止点上移,膝内仙软组织紧缩,股内侧肌移位和半侧髌腱内移术;平均随访时间４年４个月。结果 ２８例患者获得满意的功能和稳定的膝关节。运动能力明显提高;７例随访时间４年４个月。结果 ２８例患者获得满意的功能和稳定的膝关节。运动能力明显提高;７例患者虽然对膝关节功能很满意,但在进行剧烈体育运动时手术侧膝关节有力弱感,与术前相比改善不明显;１例患者术后发生再脱位,所有患者均无伤口感染和膝关节活动受限。结论 采用复合性软组织手术的方法治疗儿童习惯性髌骨脱位患者,不损伤骨骺,易于操作,可取得明显疗效。     

Microsurgical management of old injuries of the peripheral nerve and brachial plexus

A prospective study was carried out in patients suffering from old peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries to attempt to validate that functional improvement was possible after microsurgical management. Fifty patients underwent operative procedures, of whom 35 were peripheral-nerve injury cases, from 1.2 to 50 years after injury, and 15 were brachial-plexus injury cases, from 1.2 to 12 years after injury. The patients were treated by external and interfascicular neurolysis and/or autogenous nerve grafts. In cases of preganglionic nerve injury, neurotization from C3, C4 roots was done for reinnervation of trunks or cords. During external and interfascicular neurolysis in 19 of the 35 peripheral-nerve injuries, significant improvement was found in amplitude (p = 0.0001) and latency (p = 0.01) of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) at the end of the surgery, compared to the onset of surgery. Twenty (57 percent) of the 35 showed functional motor improvement up to M4-or M4. Electrophysiologic analysis of amplitude of CMAPs 1 year after surgery showed statistically significant improvement (p = 0.0003). Five (33 percent) of the 15 patients with upper brachial-plexus injuries showed functional motor improvement up to M4-(active movements against gravity and slight resistance) or M4 (active movements against gravity and moderate resistance) after surgery and of these, 11 also had lower brachial-plexus injuries, with four (36 percent) showing antigravity function M3 (active movement against gravity). Statistical analysis of recruitment 1 year after surgery demonstrated the appearance of or significant voluntary muscle activity in 45 percent of the muscles. Intraoperative electrophysiologic findings after external and interfascicular neurolysis confirmed that the viability of nerve tissue is of longer duration than previously considered. This study suggests that the use of microsurgical techniques results in the functional improvement of patients suffering from old injuries of the peripheral nerve and brachial plexus.     

Missile injuries of the sciatic nerve.

Missile injuries of the sciatic nerve are not common in civil practice. We analysed a war series of 55 cases operated on in a period from 1991 to 1995. Nerve continuity was preserved at least partially in 76.4% of cases, but only 13.3% of cases had preserved some nerve function. Surgical results were analysed in 45 cases followed for more than two years. The rates of useful functional recovery were 86.7% for tibial division, 53.3% for peroneal division and 86.7% for the sciatic nerve complex. On the basis of the obtained results we were able to make the following conclusions: (1) missile injuries to the sciatic nerve are characterised by partially preserved nerve continuity and complete functional loss in the majority of cases, (2) surgery should be performed 3 to 6 months after injury, (3) reconstruction of tibial division is the major goal of surgical repair, (4) the extent and severity of nerve damage and the type of surgical procedure are the main prognostic factors and (5) failures of surgical repair are usually related to nerve grafting at gluteal level.     

Surgical treatment and outcomes in 15 patients with anterior interosseous nerve entrapments and injuries

OBJECT: The authors present data obtained in 15 surgically treated patients with anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) entrapments and injuries. METHODS: Fifteen patients with AIN entrapments and injuries underwent surgery between 1967 and 1997 at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC) or Stanford University Medical Center. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. The LSUHSC grading system was used to evaluate the function of muscles supplied by the AIN. Nontraumatic injuries included seven AIN compressions by bone or soft tissue. Traumatic injury mechanisms consisted of stretch or contusion (six patients), injection (one patient), and burn scar (one patient). Presentations included weakness in the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) muscle to the index finger, FDP muscle to the middle finger, pronator quadratus muscle, and flexion of the distal phalanx of the thumb. Preoperative evaluations included electromyography and nerve conduction studies as well as elbow and forearm plain radiographs. On surgery, lesions in continuity involved seven compressions, four stretch or contusion injuries, and one injection injury, all of which demonstrated nerve action potentials (NAPs) and were treated with neurolysis. Among the seven compression and four stretch or contusion injury cases, six and three patients, respectively, had LSUHSC Grade 3 or better functional recoveries postoperatively. Two stretch or contusion injuries involved lesions in continuity but demonstrated negative NAPs at surgery. Thus, each was treated using a graft repair after resection of a neuroma. There was one burn scar injury, which was treated via an end-to-end suture anastomosis, leading to a functional recovery better than Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen AIN entrapments or injuries responded favorably to nerve release and/or repair.