Cemented collarless (exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components: A 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation

The purpose of this study was to compare the intermediate results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, collarless, femoral prosthesis design (Exeter, Howmedica, Middlesex, UK and CPT, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) with those of a cementless, collarless, porous-coated femoral component (PCA, Howmedica). A total of 151 hips in 128 patients were reviewed. In the cemented group, 85 Exeter-CPT prostheses were used in 71 patients with an average follow-up period of 6.5 years. In the uncemented group, 66 PCA prostheses were placed in 57 patients with an average follow-up period of 7 years. Harrington hip scores improved from 50.1 to 80.7 for the PGA group and from 49.5 to 87.3 for the Exeter-CPT group. The patient satisfaction rates were 89 and 96%, respectively. Sixty-eight patients with Exeter or CPT prostheses had excellent function and no significant thigh pain after 2 years. One Exeter stem was revised 10 years after the primary surgery because of localized osteolysis due to cement defect. Two Exeter sockets were revised because of aseptic loosening. In the PCA group, the incidence of thigh pain that persisted beyond 2 years was 39.4%, and there were high incidences of distal cortical hypertrophy (66.6%) and bead loosening (45.5%). Sixteen hips were revised for aseptic stem loosening, uncontrollable thight pain, or stem fracture (1 hip), and seven were revised because of migration and aseptic loosening of the socket. The cementless ingrowth stems failed earlier (around 5 years), whereas the cemented stems continued to perform well past 14 years. In this study, the cemented, collarless, collarless, porous-coated anatomic design at an average follow-up period of 7 years (range, 2–14 years).     

Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Improved Cementing Technique

A consecutive, non-selective cohort of 83 (77 patients) cemented total hip arthroplasty revisions using contemporary cementing techniques was analyzed at a minimum of 20 years following the index procedure. No patients were lost to follow-up. The average age at revision was 62.4 years (23 to 89). Twenty-two hips (26.5%) had had a reoperation, eighteen (21.7%) for aseptic loosening, 3 (3.6%) for femoral prosthesis fracture and 1 (1.2%) for dislocation. The incidence of re-revision for aseptic femoral loosening was 7.5% and for aseptic acetabular loosening was 21.7%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision using improved cementing techniques is a durable option in revision hip surgery. In contrast to this, THA revisions using a cemented acetabular component have been less durable at this length of follow-up.     

Long-Term Survival of the Cemented Exeter Universal Stem in Patients 50 Years and Younger: An Update on 130 Hips

BackgroundThere is variable evidence regarding survivorship beyond 20 years of total hip arthroplasties in young patients. We report the long-term results of the Exeter cemented hip system in patients ≤50 years at minimum of 20 years.MethodsClinical and radiological outcomes of 130 consecutive total hip arthroplasties in 107 patients aged 50 years or younger at primary operation were reviewed; 77% had a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis. All patients were followed at 5-year intervals, no patients were lost to follow-up, and the status of every implant is known.ResultsMean age at surgery was 41.8 (17-50) years. Mean follow-up was 22.0 (20.0-26.1) years. There were 79 hips surviving, 14 hips (11 patients) deceased, and 37 hips revised. Reasons for revision: 29 hips for aseptic cup loosening (26 stems revised using cement-in-cement, three left in-situ); three stems for femoral osteolysis, two related to acetabular polyethylene wear (14.1 and 17.0 years), one with Gaucher’s disease (21.1 years); one broken stem (12.9 years); one cup for instability (4.3 years–stem revised using cement-in-cement); and two hips with infection (8.5 and 23.8 years). There were no cases of aseptic loosening of the Exeter stem. There were no radiologically loose stems although eight patients had radiological evidence of loosening of the cemented cup. Survivorship at 22 years was 74.9% for revision for all causes and 96.3% for revision of the stem for aseptic loosening or lysis.ConclusionThe Exeter cemented stem has excellent survivorship at minimum 20 years in young patients. Acetabular component survivorship was less favorable, but the advent of highly cross-linked polyethylene may improve this in the long term.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening of the cemented stem is the most common cause of revision of total hip arthroplasties. The loosening is often associated with substantial lysis of the surrounding bone. The surface finish of femoral components is suspected as a contributing factor to this bone lysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the results associated with a rough surface and those associated with a polished surface in a consecutive series of cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. METHODS: The study included 244 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with a cemented femoral component performed by one surgeon. There was no difference in patient selection criteria or surgical techniques between the group treated with a polished stem and that treated with a grit-blasted stem. All arthroplasties were hybrid, with an uncemented acetabular component. Generally, patients were over the age of sixty years (mean age, 70.6 years). The stems inserted in the initial 122 hips had a grit-blasted surface with a roughness of 2.1 microm. The stem surface in the second 122 hips was polished (roughness, 0.1 microm). The results of clinical and radiographic assessments performed immediately after surgery were compared with those performed at the most recent visit. The average duration of clinical follow-up for the patients treated with the grit-blasted and polished stems was 5.98 years and 5.32 years, respectively. RESULTS: Four hips treated with the grit-blasted stem had aseptic loosening with substantial surrounding lysis and required revision. An additional two hips in this group had radiographic evidence of substantial lysis and were judged to have an impending need for revision. In contrast, no hip treated with the polished stem required revision, and only one had minimal lysis. This difference regarding failures and impending failures was significant (p = 0.05). The clinical results were comparable, with an Iowa hip rating of 98 points at the time of follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference between grit-blasted and polished stems with respect to the prevalence of revisions and impending revisions, all of which were identified in a relatively short follow-up period. The results in this series favor the use of a polished stem when cement is employed for fixation of the femoral component.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented femoral component

We reviewed retrospectively the results of 28 hips (25 patients) after revision of the femoral component with use of a cemented stem, because of aseptic loosening. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.43 years (range 2–12 years). Over the course of the study period, repeat revision was done in 4 hips after an average of 4.45 years. Three hips had a repeat revision of the femoral component because of aseptic loosening and one for a deep infection. The rate of loosening of the femoral component was 32.4% (9 hips) at an average of 5.22 years. The 5-year survival rate was 76.9% with mechanical failure as end point; and 90% with re-revision of femoral component because of aseptic loosening as end point. The cement mantle was the principal factor, which was significantly associated with a better survival rate of femur fixation (P < 0.05). No correlation was noted between quality of bone loss at the time of revision, bone graft or the use of long stems, and the survival rate of femoral component. By improving the cementing technique and in selected patients, the use of cemented femoral stem could be a good alternative for aseptic loosening THA.     

Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The Exeter cemented femoral stem has demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as long-term survivorship free from aseptic loosening. A shorter revision stem (125 mm) with a 44 offset became available for the purpose of cement-in-cement revision situations. In certain cases, this shorter revision stem may be used for various primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) where the standard length stem would require distally reaming the femoral canal. We sought to report on the early to midterm results of this specific stem when used for primary THA regarding (1) clinical and radiographic outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) survivorship.

The Long-Term Results of the Original Exeter Polished Cemented Femoral Component : A Follow-up Report

We present a long-term follow-up report of the results of the original Exeter polished cemented stems inserted between November 1970 and the end of 1975 at our institution by surgeons of widely differing experience using crude cementing techniques. The results of this series were reported in 1988 (Fowler et al. Orthopaedic Clinics of North America. 1988;19:477) and again in 1993 (Timperley et al. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993;75-B:33). There have been no failures from aseptic femoral component loosening since the 1993 report. From the original series of 433 hips, there were, at the end of 2003, 26 living patients with 33 hips. Of the latter, there were 25 hips in 20 patients with their original femoral components still in situ. Twenty-eight (6.46%) hips from the original series have been lost to follow-up, although none since 1992. With the end point reoperation for aseptic stem loosening, the survivorship is 93.5% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-97.0%). The reoperation rate for aseptic femoral component loosening is 3.23% into the 33rd year of follow-up.     

Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old: A multicenter evaluation of second-generation cementing technique

The results of all cemented first-time revisions in Sweden performed in patients younger than 55 years of age, during the period 1984–1986, are reported. The revisions were performed by the average orthopaedic surgeon in 25 hospitals distributed throughout Sweden. Second-generation femoral cementing technique was used. One third of the acetabular revisions were performed with pressurized cement. The reason for revision was aseptic loosening. Seventy hips in 68 patients were reviewed at an average follow-up period of 7 years (range, 4–10 years). The average age of the patients at the time of revision surgery was 47 years. Forty-eight cups and 57 stems were revised using cement. Survival analysis, with rerevision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, suggests an overall 76% survival rate after 8 years. The survival rate for the cup was 80%, and for the stem, 85%. The radiographic evaluation revealed that the cement mantle was inadequate in many revisions. Localized osteolysis was rare. Clinical data were reported for 55 (53 patients) non-rerevised hips. Thirty-five hips were without pain or slightly painful. Forty patients limped when walking. Forty-three patients were satisfied with the revised hip. These results using second-generation femoral cementing technique are better than those reported with first-generation technique, but the failure rate in this young patient population is too high. The search for a more durable fixation in revision total hip athroplasty for young patients with long life expectancy is ongoing. These results emphasize that there is a need for centralization to gain experience in extended clinical research and to further improve surgical and cementing techniques.     

Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips

Revision of a well-fixed cemented femoral stem is technically challenging. The Exeter Short Revision Stem (SRS) was developed to facilitate cement-in-cement revision mitigating some of these challenges. We present the short to mid-term results of 50 cement-in-cement revisions performed with this implant.A retrospective review of all cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter SRS, at our institution, over a seven-year period between 2007 and 2014 was conducted. Records were assessed for radiological and clinical component loosening at greater than 12 months follow-up and for revision and complications at all time points. An Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for groin and thigh pain at rest and initial mobilisation were obtained.50 implants in 46 patients were identified. Radiographic and clinical follow-up was available for 42 and 38 implants respectively at greater than 12 months. Mean radiographic follow-up was 5.1 years and clinical 4.9 years. There was no radiographic or clinical evidence of loosening. 3 revisions were performed, one for each of recurrent dislocation, infection and stem breakage. Median OHS was 39 (IQR 12) and mean NRS for groin pain at rest and initial mobilisation was 1.7 and 1.7 respectively and NRS for thigh pain at rest and initial mobilisation was 1.3 and 1.6 respectively with mean follow-up of 6.9 years.The Exeter SRS provides a viable option for cement-in-cement stem revision, with low revision, complication and loosening rates and good patient reported outcomes at short to mid-term follow up.     

The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre

We reviewed 142 consecutive primary total hip replacements implanted into 123 patients between 1988 and 1993 using the Exeter Universal femoral stem. A total of 74 patients (88 hips) had survived for ten years or more and were reviewed at a mean of 12.7 years (10 to 17). There was no loss to follow-up. The rate of revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening and osteolysis was 1.1% (1 stem), that for revision for any cause was 2.2% (2 stems), and for re-operation for any cause was 21.6% (19 hips). Re-operation was because of failure of the acetabular component in all but two hips. All but one femoral component subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.52 mm (0 to 8.3) at the final follow-up. One further stem had subsided excessively (8 mm) and had lucent lines at the cement-stem and cement-bone interfaces. This was classified as a radiological failure and is awaiting revision. One stem was revised for deep infection and one for excessive peri-articular osteolysis. Defects of the cement mantle (Barrack grade C and D) were found in 28% of stems (25 hips), associated with increased subsidence (p = 0.01), but were not associated with endosteal lysis or failure. Peri-articular osteolysis was significantly related to the degree of polyethylene wear (p < 0.001), which was in turn associated with a younger age (p = 0.01) and male gender (p < 0.001). The use of the Exeter metal-backed acetabular component was a notable failure with 12 of 32 hips (37.5%) revised for loosening. The Harris-Galante components failed with excessive wear, osteolysis and dislocation with 15% revised (5 of 33 hips). Only one of 23 hips with a cemented Elite component (4%) was revised for loosening and osteolysis. Our findings show that the Exeter Universal stem implanted outside the originating centre has excellent medium-term results.     

Total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 40 years old with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. A 5 to 19-year follow-up study

We evaluated 34 total hip arthroplasties (THA) for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 26 patients who were younger than 40 years at the time of the index operation. The average age at the time of THA was 283 (17-38) years. The mean follow-up was 10.9 (5-19) years. We used 6 cemented and 28 cementless acetabular components and a cemented polished tapered stem in all hips. The mean Charnley modified Merle d' Aubigné Postel score was 8.9 points preoperatively and 16.6 points at final follow-up. Two cemented metal-backed cups were revised because of aseptic loosening at 10 years, one cemented polyethylene cup failed at 12 years and 2 more all polyethylene cups had pending failure. The metal-backed cemented cups and the all polyethylene cups had a longer follow-up than the uncemented cups. Therefore and because of the proven unfavourable long-term outcome of the cemented metal-backed Exeter cup we are not able to draw any firm conclusions regarding the preferred choice between cemented and uncemented cups in this particular group of patients. On the femoral site none of the stems had to be revised. Our results show that a cemented polished tapered femoral component has an excellent survival in primary total hip replacement in young patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.     

Results of hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement

The Exeter stem and impacted, morselized allograft bone and cement were used in the revisions of 18 consecutive femoral components (17 patients). The primary arthroplasty had been done because of osteoarthritis. All of the femoral components were revised for the first time because of aseptic loosening. The migration pattern of the Exeter stem after revision was studied using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. At 2 years after surgery, all 18 femoral stems had migrated in the distal direction (average, 2.5 mm). In addition, seven of the stems had migrated in the medial direction (average, 1.3 mm), and two stems had migrated in the lateral direction (0.5 mm and 1 mm, respectively). Sixteen of the femoral stems also had migrated in the posterior direction (average, 2.9 mm), but none migrated in the anterior direction. The migration rate decreased gradually with time during the followup. Six femoral stems continued to migrate between 1.5 and 2 years after surgery. In patients with major femoral bone deficiency at the time of hip revision, the use of impacted morselized allograft bone and cement yielded an initial fixation similar to that obtained in conventionally cemented revisions. Pain had improved in all patients at the 2-year followup.     

Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty

The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9-15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.     

Gute langfristige Nachuntersuchungsergebnisse einer zementierten Titan-Geradschaftprothese

A higher-than-average rate of aseptic loosening has been postulated to be associated with the combination of a titanium stem and bone cement. In this prospective follow-up study we therefore investigated our first consecutive series of 250 implantations of a cemented femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium alloy (BiCONTACT((R)), Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany).Average time of follow-up evaluation was 9.7 years (range 8.7-10.3 years). At follow-up, mean patient age was 81 years; 89 patients with 93 hips have deceased and two could not be located. Follow-up rate was 98.7% for the patients still alive at time of follow-up evaluation. Five patients have been revised, two for infection and one for aseptic loosening of a varus-malaligned stem; two radiologically well-fixed stems had been revised during acetabular revision. Survival estimate showed a calculated cumulative survival rate of 97.5% after 11 years [confidence limits: 99.0% (upper) and 94.1% (lower)]. The average Harris hip score at time of follow-up was 82.25 points.Radiologically, signs of loosening could be detected in 3 stems: in one case varus malalignement deteriorated with time and in 2 cases osteolyses developed together with significant polyethylene wear. All 3 patients experienced only mild pain and revision had not been indicated so far. In conclusion, the long-term follow-up results with this cemented titanium femoral component are encouraging and are comparable to other successful cemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. No increased risk for aseptical loosening was associated to the combination of titanium and cement in this specific stem. Design parameters seem to play an important role in the development of aseptic loosening in cemented titanium stems.     

Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy

Introduction Inferior survival of cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported after previous femoral osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of uncemented stems after femoral osteotomy.Materials and methods Forty-eight hips in 45 patients had undergone conversion THA for a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip after a mean of 12 years (2–33 years). Mean time of follow-up was 11 years (5–15 years).Results At follow-up, two patients (three hips) had died, and one patient (one hip) was not located. Three patients (three hips) underwent femoral revision—one for infection and two for aseptic loosening of the stem. Survival of the stem was 94% at 10 years, and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 96%. The median Harris Hip Score at follow-up was 80 points. Radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 14 and 18% of hips, respectively. Radiolucencies in other zones were not detected. There was no radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis, stress-shielding or loosening.Conclusion The results with this type of uncemented tapered titanium femoral component after proximal femoral osteotomy are encouraging and compare to those achieved in patients with regular femoral anatomy.     

初次混合式全髋关节置换术骨水泥柄的生存率分析

目的 探讨骨水泥柄全髋关节置换术后中期临床疗效.方法 接受骨水泥柄髋关节置换患者148例167髋,男95例106髋,女53例61髋;年龄28~87岁,平均62.8岁;体重45.2~87.4 kg,平均57.2 kg;身高146~184cm,平均161.5cm;平均体重指数21.4.临床疗效以Harris评分为标准,根据影像学资料评估股骨柄假体位置、骨水泥壳、假体周围骨重塑和骨溶解发生情况.以股骨假体无菌性松动和任何原因所致的假体翻修为终点,对假体生存率采用Kaplan-Meier分析.结果 106例114髋获得随访,随访时间6.5~9.5年,平均8.1年.术前Harris评分8~54分,平均42分;末次随访时76~100分,平均94分.无一例发生无菌性松动及假体翻修.6髋假体柄平均下沉1.83mm.16髋(14%)股骨侧出现<1mm的影像学透亮线,9髋(8%)Gruen Ⅰ区和Ⅶ区出现局灶性骨溶解所致斑点样影像学透亮区.106髋(93%)股骨侧有不同程度的皮质变薄或皮质松质骨化,均位于Ⅶ区.假体生存率为100%(95%可信区间.0.95-1.00).结论 采用第三代骨水泥技术固定股骨柄,可取得较好中期临床效果,但仍存在骨溶解、股骨近端皮质骨吸收重塑等潜在问题.     

Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results

BACKGROUND: Use of modern cementing techniques for fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty has had excellent clinical and radiographic results in most patients. However, several authors have described early loosening of femoral components with roughened and precoated finishes. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the precoated Iowa stem, which has increased offset, and to compare the results with those of another cemented precoated femoral component with standard offset used at our institution. METHODS: We carried out a prospective analysis of 102 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) performed with use of the Iowa femoral component in ninety-five patients at our institution. The Iowa stem was used in hips that required greater offset than is available with standard stems as determined by preoperative templating. The average age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was sixty-nine years. Sixteen patients (seventeen hips) died before the forty-eight-month minimum follow-up period had elapsed. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and radiographic follow-up was incomplete for one. The mean duration of clinical and radiographic follow-up of the remaining eighty-two hips in the seventy-six surviving patients was sixty-five months (range, forty-eight to 104 months). RESULTS: The average preoperative Harris hip score of 47 points (range, 16 to 69 points) improved to an average of 87 points (range, 24 to 100 points) at the time of the review. Two hips underwent femoral component revision. Four femoral stems were radiographically loose at an average of thirty-four months. Femoral osteolysis was seen in five hips (6 percent) at an average of fifty-four months postoperatively. No acetabular component was revised because of aseptic loosening. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the seven-year survival rate, with an end point of femoral revision, osteolysis, or stem debonding, was 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of revision, osteolysis, and loosening after total hip arthroplasty with the Iowa femoral component at our institution was higher than that seen in our series of Harris Precoat stems, which had a survival rate of 98.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00) at ten years with the same end points. The design of the Iowa stem may make it difficult to achieve a good cement mantle, and, in combination with the geometry and increased offset of the stem, may compromise the long-term survival of this cemented femoral component.     

Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The long-term results of revision of failed primary cemented femoral components with use of cement have been reported, but there is little information about the results of revision of failed uncemented femoral components with use of cement. The purpose of the present study was to examine the minimum five-year results for patients in whom a failed uncemented primary femoral component was revised with use of modern cementing techniques. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive hips (forty-seven patients) in which a failed primary uncemented femoral component was revised with use of cement at one institution from 1985 to 1992 were followed prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision was sixty-seven years. Only seven revisions were performed with a long-stem femoral component. The postoperative cement mantle was classified, according to the system of Mulroy and Harris, as grade A in four hips, grade B in twenty-five, grade C1 in seven, grade C2 in twelve, and grade D in none. RESULTS: Eleven femoral components were removed or revised because of aseptic loosening (ten) or deep infection (one). An additional four unrevised femoral components had evidence of probable or definite loosening at the time of the final radiographic follow-up. Thus, fourteen (29%) of the forty-eight femoral implants demonstrated aseptic loosening during the study period. Five of the twenty-nine hips in which the postoperative cement mantle was classified as grade A or B had mechanical failure at the time of the final follow-up, compared with nine of the nineteen hips in which the postoperative cement mantle was classified as grade C1 or C2 (p < 0.05). Among the hips with surviving prostheses, 79% had had moderate or severe pain preoperatively whereas 25% had moderate or severe pain at the time of the final follow-up. The six-year rate of survival of the femoral component was 72% with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point and 67% with mechanical failure (revision for aseptic loosening or radiographic loosening) as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: While revision of a failed uncemented femoral implant with use of cement provided pain relief and improved function for most patients, the rate of loosening at the time of intermediate-term follow-up was higher than that commonly reported after revision of failed cemented implants with use of cement and also was higher than that commonly reported after revision with use of uncemented extensively porous-coated implants. Bone removal at the time of the initial implantation of the stem and bone loss due to subsequent failure of the uncemented implant often left little intramedullary cancellous bone, which may explain the high rate of loosening observed in the first decade after revision in this series.     

Clinical and Radiological Long-Term Results After Charnley-müller Total Hip Replacement: A 5 to 10 Year Follow-up Study with Special Reference to Aseptic Loosening

Ninety-nine per cent of the arthroplasties available for follow-up after a minimum of 5 years were assessed clinically and radiologically. Of the original 151 hips, 14 had been reoperated on with exchange of the femoral components because of aseptic loosening. Thirty-one of the 115 re-examined hips showed radiological evidence of femoral component loosening and in 15 hips loosening was suspected. One acetabular component was loose. No deep infection was detected. In 10 of the 31 hips with femoral stem loosening, no complication was suspected after clinical examination only. Varus position of the prosthesis and insufficient cement support at the proximal and distal parts of the stem were associated with increased loosening rates. In patients with a body-weight over 80 kg and in patients younger than 60 years at the operation, loosening had occurred in over 50 per cent of the hips. The clinical overall results were satisfactory, with 79 per cent of the hips being free from significant pain.     

Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that cemented femoral components with a polished surface may provide superior long-term fixation when compared with femoral components with a roughened surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component with a polished surface finish and compare them with the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with a similar design of cemented femoral component with a rougher surface finish. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of 132 patients (149 hips) in whom primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed by one surgeon using a cemented collared femoral component with a polished (0.1-microm Ra) surface finish and a cementless acetabular component. Ninety-eight patients (115 hips) were followed for a minimum of ten years. We compared the survivorship of this prosthesis with that of a femoral component of similar design but with rougher surfaces (matte or grit-blasted). RESULTS: No polished stems were revised because of aseptic loosening or demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening; however, eight hips (5.4%) with a polished stem demonstrated osteolysis distal to the greater or lesser tro-chanter. In contrast, six stems (2.0%) with a matte surface finish of 0.8-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional five stems were seen to be loose radiographically. Eleven stems (9.2%) with a grit-blasted surface finish of 2.1-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional four stems were seen to be loose radiographically. The difference in the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.1-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface was significant (p = 0.001), as was the difference between the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.8-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface (p = 0.001). No cups were revised because of aseptic loosening, and one hip had radiographic signs of acetabular loosening. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated excellent durability of a prosthesis consisting of a cemented, collared, polished femoral component and a cementless acetabular component. While no hips were revised because of aseptic loosening, distal femoral osteolysis was observed in eight hips (5.4%), a higher prevalence than has been reported by others after similar durations of follow-up of tapered, collarless, polished femoral components.