Influence of Reuse and of Reuse Sterilants on the First-Use Syndrome

Over a 4 year period, five of 98 patients at our dialysis unit developed signs and symptoms consistent with first-use syndrome (FUS). Marked improvement was noted after subjecting new dialyzers to automated processing using either formaldehyde or peracetic acid. No episodes of FUS occurred in patients being treated with reused dialyzers. Use of formaldehyde sterilization was associated with development of anti-N-like antibodies in the blood of four (8%) of 50 patients over a follow-up period of 14 months. In two patients on the reuse program, itching during dialysis resolved after changing from formaldehyde-sterilization to a method using peracetic acid. Our results confirm the beneficial effects of reuse with regard to first-use syndrome. However, our data also suggest that use of formaldehyde, the most common reuse sterilant, continues to be associated with undesirable clinical and laboratory side effects.     

Impact of bleach cleaning on the performance of dialyzers with polysulfone membranes processed for reuse using peracetic Acid

Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.     

In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and bleach cleaning of polysulfone hemodialysis membranes

Dialyzer reuse has been employed throughout the history of hemodialysis, but the practice remains controversial. Many studies have found changes in the beta(2)-microglobulin clearance for reused dialyzers, but it is difficult to draw quantitative conclusions from the clinical data. The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare the effects of bleach and peracetic acid cleaning on the clearance and surface charge characteristics of Fresenius F80B polysulfone dialyzers (Fresenius Medical Care, Lexington, MA, USA). Clearance experiments were performed using urea, vitamin B(12), and polydisperse dextrans, with data obtained before and after exposure to human plasma in an in vitro dialysis circuit. Dialyzers cleaned with peracetic acid had significantly lower clearance of the larger dextrans due to the presence of residual protein on or within the membrane. Bleach was able to remove this protein deposit, restoring the clearance characteristics, but there was a significant increase in the net negative charge of the membrane due to chemical reaction with the bleach. In addition, longer time exposure to bleach altered the membrane transport characteristics, increasing the solute clearance. These results provide important insights into the effects of bleach and peracetic acid on the properties of the F80B dialyzers.     

Association of dialyzer reuse and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the US

OBJECTIVES: To determine if reuse of hemodialyzers is associated with higher rates of hospitalization and their resulting costs among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. METHODS: Noncurrent cohort study of hospitalization rates among 27,264 ESRD patients beginning hemodialysis in the United States in 1986 and 1987. RESULTS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers was associated with a greater rate of hospitalization than in facilities not reprocessing (relative rate (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.14). This higher rate of hospitalization was observed with dialyzer reuse using peracetic/acetic acids (RR = 1.11, CI 1. 04-1.18) and formaldehyde (RR = 1.07, CI 1.00-1.14), but not glutaraldehyde (p = 0.97). There was no difference among hospitalization rates in hospital-based facilities reprocessing dialyzers with any sterilant and those not reprocessing. Hospitalization for causes other than vascular access morbidity in free-standing facilities reusing dialyzers with formaldehyde was not different from hospitalization in facilities not reusing. However, reuse with peracetic/acetic acids was associated with higher rates of hospitalization than formaldehyde (RR = 1.08, CI 1.03-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers with peracetic/acetic acids or formaldehyde was associated with greater hospitalization than dialysis without dialyzer reprocessing. This greater hospitalization accounts for a large increment in inpatient stays in the USA. These findings raise important concerns about potentially avoidable morbidity among hemodialysis patients. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Plate, Coil, and Hollow-Fiber Cuprammonium Cellulose Dialyzers: Discrepancy Between Incidence of Anaphylactic Reactions and Degree of Complement Activation

During the past 10 years, the incidence of severe anaphylactic reactions during dialysis [type A first-use syndrome (FUS)] at our center has been much lower when using cuprammonium cellulose plate (CC-P) dialyzers (0/37, 750 dialyses) or coil (CC-C) dialyzers (0/32, 500) than when using cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber (CC-F) dialyzers (8/21,022 dialyses, p less than 0.005 by Chi-square). To determine if the difference in type A FUS incidence between the three dialyzer types could be explained by differences in complement activation, we compared plasma concentrations of C3a des-arginine (des arg) in patients undergoing dialysis with these three varieties of dialyzers. Plasma C3a des arg values increased markedly in the dialyzer outflow blood with the three dialyzer configurations. The levels were similar with the dialyzer types when results were corrected for membrane surface area. Also, the degree of leukopenia was not markedly different with the three dialyzer types. Our findings suggest that complement activation per unit surface area is similar during dialysis with plate, coil, and hollow-fiber cuprammonium cellulose dialyzers. The lack of correlation between the degree of complement activation and the incidence of type A FUS suggests that membrane-induced complement activation is not of primary importance to type A dialyzer hypersensitivity reactions.     

不同种类透析膜对血浆补体终末复合物浓度的影响

目的：了解不同种类透析膜对补体系统激活的影响。方法：用酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA）测定维持性血液透析患者用不同种类透析膜透析膜透析过程中不同时间血浆SC5b-9（补体终末复合物）浓度,并进行比较。结果：用CU膜（cuprophane membrane,铜仿膜）透析,透析过程中血浆SC5b-9浓度变化最大;其次是用PMMA膜（polymethyl methacrylate,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯膜）、HE膜（hemophane membrane,血仿膜）、PSN膜（polysynthane hemodialyser,仿生膜）透析;HE膜用过氧乙酸和福尔马林消毒第4次复用,血浆SC5b-9浓度变化幅度较首次使用明显降低（P＜0.05）。结论：不同种类透析膜激活补体的能力不同,依次为：CU＞PMMA＞HE＞PSN;HE膜用过氧乙酸和福尔马林消毒复用可在一定程度降低其激活补体的能力。     

Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics in maintenance hemodialysis: a comparison of conventional and high-flux dialyzers and the effects of dialyzer reuse

beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2M) forms synovial and bony amyloid deposits in long-term hemodialysis patients. To define the kinetics of beta 2M during hemodialysis and the effects of dialyzer reprocessing, we measured serum beta 2M, plasma C3a, and neutrophil counts immediately predialysis; 15, 90, and 180 minutes after beginning dialysis; and 15 minutes postdialysis in ten chronic hemodialysis patients. The studies were performed during first and third uses of cuprammonium rayon and polysulfone dialyzers processed by rinsing with water, then bleach, in an automated system (Seratronics DRS 4) and then packed in 1.5% formaldehyde. Mean serum beta 2M (corrected for ultrafiltration) decreased by 16.6% +/- 18.1% with new cuprammonium dialyzers and 57.1% +/- 12.8% with new polysulfone dialyzers. Dialyzer reprocessing had no significant effect on this decline. Predialysis serum beta 2M decreased by 30.4% +/- 15.5% 1 month after switching from cuprammonium to polysulfone dialyzers; these levels remained stable after 3 months of dialysis with polysulfone. Complement activation and neutropenia during dialysis were significantly more marked with cuprammonium, but were not affected by reprocessing of either dialyzer. In vitro adsorption of 124I-beta 2M to polysulfone fibers was greater than to cuprammonium; adsorption was not influenced by dialyzer reprocessing.     

Dialyzer reuse-Part I: Historical perspective

The first apparatus for hemodialysis in animals, made painstakingly by Abel et al. in their laboratory at the beginning of 20th century, was cleaned with acid-pepsin to digest blood, disinfected with thymol, and reused for up to 30 experiments for as long as 8 months. The obvious incentive was saving time. In the early years of hemodialysis in patients, dialyzers and lines were assembled and sterilized immediately before dialysis. Various methods of dry and moist heat sterilization and miscellaneous chemical agents were employed for disinfection. Significant time was required to assemble the dialyzers, so there was an incentive to reuse previously assembled dialyzers to save time, especially for home hemodialysis. Bleach to clean and formaldehyde to disinfect the membranes and lines was used for this purpose. Preassembled dialyzers, commercially introduced in the 1950s, were the most expensive components of hemodialysis systems, therefore reprocessing of these dialyzers was the most effective way to save money. Refrigeration of coil dialyzers with blood, introduced in the mid-1960s, was associated with frequent febrile reactions and was soon abandoned. Preassembled coil and plate dialyzers permitted almost complete return of blood after dialysis and led to the introduction of chemical disinfection for dialyzer reprocessing. A variety of disinfectants have been used. Formaldehyde was the most common disinfectant until the end of the 1970s. Sodium hypochlorite was used to clean the majority of dialyzers and to sterilize dialyzers with polyacrylonitrile membranes. In the early 1980s, peracetic acid and glutaraldehyde started to compete with formaldehyde. By the 1990s, formaldehyde had become less popular than peracetic acid. In the mid-1990s, disinfection and membrane cleaning with acetic acid and heat was introduced. Manual reprocessing was replaced by early reuse machines in the mid-1970s and a more sophisticated second generation of automated hemodialyzer reprocessing machines followed in the late 1970s. Recently disinfection of dialyzers with moist heat has resumed. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations for designing a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and moist-heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, the reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines has become less popular and is almost extinct.     

Complement Activation During Hemodialysis: Clinical Observations, Proposed Mechanisms, and Theoretical Implications

Abstract: Human C3a radioimmunoassay techniques were employed to define both the temporal profile and the amount of complement activation taking place in the extracorporeal circuit during maintenance hemodialysis. Prospective studies demonstrated that C3a formation, like hemodialysis-associated leukopenia, was a transient phenomenon that occurred predominantly during the first 30 min of dialysis. Quantitative comparisons revealed that new Cuprophan hemodialyzers displayed somewhat greater complement-activating potential than cellulose acetate dialyzers. By contrast to new Cuprophan membranes, both reused Cuprophan and polyacrylonitrile dialyzers exhibited only a modest ability to activate human complement. These findings are compatible with the known mechanisms of complement activation and suggest that certain chemical and biochemical methods might be exploited to enhance the biocompatibility of cellulose dialysis membranes.     

Residual Formaldehyde in Dialyzers: Quantity, Location, and the Effect of Different Methods of Rinsing

When formalin-sterilized dialyzers were rinsed by our standard technique (similar to that used in many other dialysis centres) undesirable concentrations of formaldehyde were found in the dialyzers at the start of dialysis. When the technique was modified by passing part of the saline through the blood compartment immediately before connection and discarding the saline left in the dialyzer at the time of connection, the concentration of formaldehyde infused into the patient fell below 2 μg/ml. However, the dialyzers still contained up to 13 mg of formaldehyde which leached slowly from the dialyzer during simulated dialysis. Some residual formaldehyde was found in several components of the dialyzer but the great majority was contained in the cellulose membrane.     

A new synthetic dialyzer with advanced permselectivity for enhanced low-molecular weight protein removal

Optimizing solute removal at minimized albumin loss is a major goal of dialyzer engineering. In a prospective, randomized, crossover study on eight patients (age 63 +/- 14 years) on maintenance hemodialysis, the new Baxter Xenium 170 high-flux dialyzer (BX), which contains a 1.7-m(2) PUREMA H dialysis membrane, was compared with two widely used reference high-flux dialyzers currently available for hemodialysis in North America, the Fresenius Optiflux 180 NR (FO) and the Gambro Polyflux 170 H (GP). Solute removal and biocompatibility were assessed in hemodialysis for 240 min at blood and dialysate flow rates of 300 and 500 mL/min, respectively. Additional ex vivo experiments detecting the interleukin-1beta (IL-1b) generation in recirculated donor blood were performed to demonstrate the pyrogen retention properties of the dialyzers. The instantaneous plasma clearances were similar for the three dialyzers except for cystatin c (cysc), for which a lower clearance was measured with FO as compared with BX and GP after 30 and 180 min of hemodialysis. The reduction ratios (RRs) corrected for the hemoconcentration of beta(2)-microglobulin and cysc were lower in FO (44 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 9%, respectively) versus BX (62 +/- 6 and 59 +/- 7%, respectively) and GP (61 +/- 7 and 56 +/- 8%, respectively). The RRs of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 were not different between the dialyzers. The albumin loss was <300 mg for all filters. No differences between the dialyzers were found in the biocompatibility parameters showing very low leukocyte and complement activation. The ex vivo recirculation experiments revealed a significantly higher IL-1b generation for GP (710 +/- 585 pg/mL) versus BX (317 +/- 211 pg/mL) and FO (151 +/- 38 pg/mL). BX is characterized by a steep solute sieving profile with high low-molecular weight protein removal at virtually no albumin loss and an excellent biocompatibility. This improved performance may be regarded as a contribution to optimal dialysis therapy.     

Compartmental distribution of complement activation products in artificial kidneys

The compartmental distribution of the human anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a has been defined during simulated hemodialysis performed with various types of hemodialyzers. New cuprophan hollow fiber dialyzers were found to activate human complement very readily in vitro, while re-used cuprophan dialyzers displayed only modest complement activating potential. The C3a and C5a antigens, formed as a result of complement activation in these dialyzers, accumulated predominantly in the blood path and were not adsorbed extensively on the membrane surface or transported into the dialysate compartment. Cellulose acetate membranes also produced complement activation in vitro, but to a lesser degree than new cuprophan hollow fibers. However, these membranes exhibited a significant capacity to bind the anaphylatoxins to their surface. Polyacrylonitrile membranes appeared to be unique in that they not only failed to activate complement significantly, but they rapidly adsorbed large quantities of C3a and C5a. These findings demonstrate that hemodialysis membranes may differ with regard to their complement activating potential as well as their ability to remove circulating anaphylatoxins from the blood path. Clinical measurements of anaphylatoxin production during hemodialysis reflect these dynamic events.     

Dialyzer-dependent changes in solute and water permeability with bleach reprocessing

The effects of bleach reprocessing on the performance of high-flux dialyzers have not been comprehensively characterized. We compared the effects of automated bleach/formaldehyde reprocessing on solute and hydraulic permeability for cellulose triacetate (CT190) and polysulfone (F80B) dialyzers using an in vitro model. Dialyzers were studied after initial blood exposure (R0) and after 1 (R1), 5 (R5), 10 (R10), and 15 (R15) reuse cycles. Ultrafiltration coefficient (K(uf)), serial clearances, and/or sieving coefficients (SCs) of urea, creatinine, vancomycin, inulin, myoglobin, and albumin were determined. Urea, creatinine, and vancomycin clearances and SCs did not significantly differ from R0 to R15 with either dialyzer. Inulin clearances and SC also did not significantly change from R0 to R15 for the CT190. However, these same values for the F80B significantly increased (P < 0.05). The inulin clearance and SC values for the CT190 dialyzer were significantly higher than those for the F80B at all stages except R15. Myoglobin clearances significantly increased over 15 reuses for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). However, CT190 myoglobin clearances were significantly higher at all stages (R0 = 37.7 +/- 9.7; R15 = 52.5 +/- 8.8 mL/min) than the F80B (R0 = negligible; R15 = 41.3 +/- 16.5 mL/min; P < 0.01). Albumin pre- and postdialysis SCs significantly increased for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). K(uf) for R0 and R15 were 52.3 +/- 3.3 and 52.6 +/- 7.6 mL/h/mm Hg for CT190 (P = not significant) and 48.8 +/- 4.4 and 87.3 +/- 7.0 mL/h/mm Hg for F80B (P < 0.0001). We conclude that bleach reprocessing significantly increases larger solute and hydraulic permeability of high-flux cellulosic and polysulfone dialyzers. This effect is more pronounced for the polysulfone membrane. Until 10 reuses or greater, the removal of solutes greater than 1,500 d is significantly compromised with the polysulfone dialyzer used in this study.     

Acute Symptoms During and Between Hemodialysis: The Relative Role of Speed, Duration, and Biocompatibility of Dialysis

Abstract: The relationship between hemodialysis (HD) symptoms and dialyzer membrane composition and area, blood–flow, treatment duration, urea removal, ultrafiltration volume, leukocyte activation, and complement generation (C3a) was studied in 20 patients undergoing 234 HD treatments by 12 different modes in random order using Cuprophan, hemophane, or polyamide membranes with small or large membrane areas with high Qb (400 ml/min) and short duration (2 h) or low Qb (200 ml/min) and long duration (4 h). Fewer symptoms occurred during the 2–h HD at high Qb than during the 4–h HD with low Qb (19% vs. 32%, p = 0. 0351). No differences were observed between different dialyzer membranes or areas. More intradialytic symptoms occurred when urea elimination was high than it was low (p = 0. 0044). Leukocyte activation (leukocyte drop) after 15 min of dialysis and complement generation did not influence symptom incidence. Blood pressure changes were mainly influenced by ultrafiltration volume (p < 0. 001). Symptoms between dialyses were determined by urea removal and ultrafiltration. Membrane, area, or Qb were of no importance. Thus, duration of dialysis, urea removal, and demand for ultrafiltration, but not membrane composition, area, or biocompatability, are important for the development of HD–related symptoms.     

Effect of dialyzer geometry on granulocyte and complement activation

During hemodialysis with cuprophan membranes, the complement system as well as leukocytes become activated. In order to clarify the role of dialyzer geometry, the effect of hollow-fiber versus flat-sheet dialyzers and of different surface areas on C3a generation and leukocyte degranulation was investigated. Plasma levels of leukocyte elastase in complex with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor were significantly increased after 1 h (+55%) and 3 h (+62%) of hemodialysis with flat-sheet dialyzers as compared to hollow-fiber devices. In addition, plasma levels of lactoferrin, released from the specific granules of leukocytes during activation, were significantly higher (+42%) 3 h after the onset of dialysis treatment with flat-sheet than with hollow-fiber dialyzers. With respect to surface area, larger dialyzers tended to cause more release of leukocyte elastase as compared to dialyzers with smaller surface areas, irrespectively of the configuration of the dialyzer used. On the other hand, activation of the complement system, as measured by the generation of C3a-desarg, did not differ with both types of configurations. The same held true for leukopenia, which was almost identical for hollow-fiber and flat-sheet dialyzers. From these findings two lines of evidence emerge: First, not only the type of membrane material used in a dialyzer may influence its biocompatibility, but the geometry of the extracorporeal device also determines the degree of compatibility. Hence, the extent of leukocyte activation correlated with both configuration of the dialyzer and surface area of the membrane.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dialyzer reuse--part II: advantages and disadvantages

Although single dialyzer use and reuse by chemical reprocessing are both associated with some complications, there is no definitive advantage to either in this respect. Some complications occur mainly at the first use of a dialyzer: a new cellophane or cuprophane membrane may activate the complement system, or a noxious agent may be introduced to the dialyzer during production or generated during storage. These agents may not be completely removed during the routine rinsing procedure. The reuse of dialyzers is associated with environmental contamination, allergic reactions, residual chemical infusion (rebound release), inadequate concentration of disinfectants, and pyrogen reactions. Bleach used during reprocessing causes a progressive increase in dialyzer permeability to larger molecules, including albumin. Reprocessing methods without the use of bleach are associated with progressive decreases in membrane permeability, particularly to larger molecules. Most comparative studies have not shown differences in mortality between centers reusing and those not reusing dialyzers, however, the largest cluster of dialysis-related deaths occurred with single-use dialyzers due to the presence of perfluorohydrocarbon introduced during the manufacturing process and not completely removed during preparation of the dialyzers before the dialysis procedure. The cost savings associated with reuse is substantial, especially with more expensive, high-flux synthetic membrane dialyzers. With reuse, some dialysis centers can afford to utilize more efficient dialyzers that are more expensive; consequently they provide a higher dose of dialysis and reduce mortality. Some studies have shown minimally higher morbidity with chemical reuse, depending on the method. Waste disposal is definitely decreased with the reuse of dialyzers, thus environmental impacts are lessened, particularly if reprocessing is done by heat disinfection. It is safe to predict that dialyzer reuse in dialysis centers will continue because it also saves money for the providers. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations to design a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines is becoming less popular and is almost extinct.     

Cuprophan reuse and intradialytic changes of lung diffusion capacity and blood gases

The changes in arterial blood gas, pulmonary function tests, leukocyte counts and complement activation were evaluated during first use and subsequent reuse of cuprophan dialyzers. The dialysate buffer was bicarbonate. Reuse of cuprophan dialyzers significantly attenuated the fall in leukocyte counts and the rise in C3a des Arg seen during first use dialysis. First use dialysis also caused a drop in arterial paO2 from 93.0 +/- 12.4 mm Hg to a nadir of 82.8 +/- 12.6 mm Hg at 60 minutes (P less than 0.01). PaO2 levels did not change when reused dialyzers were employed (93.7 +/- 12.2 before dialysis and 96.4 +/- 15.2 mm Hg at 60 minutes, P greater than 0.05). Intradialytic paO2 curves obtained during first use and reuse were significantly different by variance analysis (P less than 0.001). There was also a significant decline in lung diffusion capacity (DLCO, from 30.70 +/- 8.89 to 23.77 +/- 7.76 ml/min X mm Hg, P less than 0.01) and transfer factor (KCO, from 6.07 +/- 1.97 to 5.65 +/- 2.13 ml/min X mm Hg, P less than 0.01), during first use at one hour after initiation of dialysis. This decrease was entirely prevented during reuse, (P less than 0.001 vs. first use by variance analysis). Percentual changes in leukocyte counts and C3a des Arg concentration on one hand, and in paO2, DLCO and KCO on the other were significantly correlated to each other. Other factors with a possible influence on intradialytic pulmonary function such as ultrafiltration volume, dialysate buffer composition, evolution of intradialytic blood pH and cardiac output, were all identical under both experimental conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A prospective study on intradialytic symptoms associated with reuse of hemodialyzers.

The benefits and disadvantages of hemodialyzer reuse is controversial. While biochemical data have suggested potential benefits from reuse, there is dispute over the clinical impact on the patient. Limited data show that reuse is associated with less intradialytic symptoms compared to first use. We conducted a prospective study of acute symptoms during clinical dialysis using new and reused cellulose acetate membrane hollow-fiber dialyzers. A total of 106 sessions using new dialyzers and 871 sessions employing reused dialyzers were monitored. Dialyzers were processed with an automated machine using hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid as sterilants. We found that, compared to new ones, reused dialyzers were associated with a similar frequency of overall and specific symptoms. In addition, there was no difference in the magnitude of changes in blood pressure during and after the treatments between the two groups. We conclude that maintenance hemodialysis with reused cellulose acetate membrane dialyzers processed with hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid was not associated with more or fewer subjective symptoms than dialysis with new dialyzers.     

Effect of RenNew-D as a sterilant on the performance of reused dialyzers

RenNew-D (Alcide), a novel demand-release sporocidal agent, was employed instead of formaldehyde in the reprocessing for reuse of cuprophan hollow fiber dialyzers (Gambro) and the performance of these dialyzers was evaluated over 40 consecutive dialyses in six patients on maintenance hemodialysis. When RenNew-D was part of automated reprocessing performed with 4.3% bleach as specified by the manufacturer (Lixivitron), dialyzer survival was prolonged (16.7 +/- 7.2 uses) and hemodialysis neutropenia was unchanged with reuse. When RenNew-D was part of manual reprocessing conducted in the absence of bleach, marked improvement in dialyzer biocompatibility was observed but with a decreased survival (4.8 +/- 3.0). The majority of dialyzer failures were due to a fall in fiber bundle volume below a 85% set limit. Small solute clearances were maintained with both types of reprocessing. Dialyses were well tolerated throughout. Our data suggest that RenNew-D is a safe and efficacious product which can serve as a valuable alternative to formaldehyde for the purpose of dialyzer reuse.     

Does Treatment Modality Have an Impact on Anemia in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure? Effect of Low‐ and High‐Flux Biocompatible Dialysis

Renal anemia significantly affects the morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients. The aim of the present study was to establish whether the severity of anemia and success of its treatment differs when using high-flux (HF) or low-flux (LF) hemodialysis. Twenty-five patients on long-term hemodialysis with a mean hematocrit (Hct) of 33%, S alb of 36 g/L, and Kt/V urea of 1.5 were divided into Groups X (n = 13) and Y (n = 12) in a prospective randomized crossover study. Group X was initially treated with LF hemodialysis to be followed by HF hemodialysis for 8 weeks each time. Group Y started with 8 week HF hemodialysis and continued, after crossover, with 8 weeks of LF hemodialysis. HF and LF hemodialysis were performed with polysulfone dialyzers F 7HPS and F60S (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Hct values, examined at 2 week intervals, did not differ significantly between Groups X and Y during 16 weeks of the study at any measuring interval. In another analysis, all results of HF hemodialysis (first 8 weeks of Y + second 8 weeks of X) were pooled as were all data of LF hemodialysis (first 8 weeks of X + second 8 weeks of Y). No significant relationships were noted between duration of treatment with HF hemodialysis and Hct (n = 72, rS = 0.11, p = 0.36) and between duration of LF hemodialysis and Hct (n = 74, rS = 0.02, p = 0.87) in the newly formed groups. The Hct measured during HF hemodialysis and LF hemodialysis did not differ significantly. Analysis of variance did not reveal a relationship between Hct and the HF or LF membrane. As HF and LF hemodialysis differed significantly in Kt/V urea, the variables were adjusted to identical Kt/V urea using analysis of covariance. No relationship between Hct and dialysis membrane permeability was demonstrated even in this case. Use of biocompatible LF and HF membranes in standard hemodialysis modes under conditions of adequate dose of dialysis and the time period studied did not result in different effects on anemia.