Use of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis to validate the benefit of iodine-125 implants in the primary treatment of malignant gliomas.

PURPOSE: To date, numerous retrospective studies have suggested that the addition of brachytherapy to the conventional treatment of malignant gliomas (MG) (surgical resection followed by radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy) leads to improvements in survival. Two randomized trials have suggested either a positive or no survival benefit with implants. Critics of retrospective reports have suggested that the improvement in patient survival is due to selection bias. A recursive analysis by the RTOG of MG trials has stratified MG patients into 6 prognostically significant classes. We used the RTOG criteria to analyze the implant data at Wayne State University to determine the impact of selection bias. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1991 and January 1998, 75 patients were treated with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and stereotactic I-125 implant as primary MG management. Forty-one (54.7%) were male; 34 (45.3%) female. Median age was 52 years (range 4-79). Twenty-two (29.3%) had anaplastic astrocytoma (AA); 53 (70.7%), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Seventy-two patients had data making them eligible for stratification into the 6 RTOG prognostic classes (I-VI). Median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range 50-100). There were 14, 0, 14, 31, 12, and 1 patients in Classes I to VI, respectively. Median follow-up time for AA, GBM, and any surviving patient was 29, 12.5, and 35 months, respectively. RESULTS: At analysis, 29 (40.3%) patients were alive; 43 (59.7%), dead. For AA and GBM patients, 2-year and median survivals were: 58% and 40%; 38 and 17 months, respectively. For analysis purposes, Classes I and II, V and VI were merged. By class, the 2-year survival for implanted patients compared to the RTOG data base was: III--68% vs. I--76%; III--74% vs. 35%; IV--34% vs. 15%; V/VI--29% vs. V--6%. For implant patients, median survival by class was (in months): I/II--37; III--31; IV--16; V/VI--11. CONCLUSION: When applied to MG patients receiving permanent I-125 implant, the criteria of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis are a valid tool to define prognostically distinct survival groups. As reflected in the RTOG study, a downward survival trend for the implant patients is seen from "best to worse" class patients. Compared to the RTOG database, median survival achieved by the addition of implant is improved most demonstrably for the poorer prognostic classes. This would suggest that selection bias alone does not account for the survival benefit seen with I-125 implant and would contradict the notion that the patients most eligible for implant are those gaining the most benefit from the treatment. In light of the contradictory results from two randomized studies and given the present results, further randomized studies with effective stratification are required since the evidence for a survival benefit with brachytherapy (as seen in retrospective studies) is substantial.     

Single-arm, open-label phase II study of intravenously administered tirapazamine and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine (Sanofi Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA), a bioreductive agent, in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The patients were staged according to a model constructed by a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of glioma patients in prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials and compared with a matched standard population, as predicted by the model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients diagnosed with a GBM were treated with radiation therapy and intravenous tirapazamine between January 27,1995, and April 25,1997. All patients received 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Tirapazamine was delivered three times a week for 12 treatments during radiotherapy. Fifty-five patients received tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2). A second dose level, 260 mg/m(2), was opened, and 69 patients were entered. RESULTS: There was no significant survival advantage to the drug in any RPA class at either dose level. The median survival time was 10.8 months for the patient population treated with the 159-mg/m(2) dose of tirapazamine and 9.5 months for the group treated with the 260-mg/m (2) dose of tirapazamine. Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2) were 27.4 months (class III), 10.8 months (class IV), 7.9 months (class V), and 3.8 months (class VI). Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 260 mg/m(2) were 16.2 months (class III), 10.3 months (class IV), 5. 1 months (class V), and 1.3 months (class VI). Patients in RPA class III treated in the 159 mg/m(2) dose arm had a notably longer survival than patients in the RTOG database RPA class III, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no fatal toxicities. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent at the higher dose level. CONCLUSION: Survival in the population treated with radiation and tirapazamine was equivalent to the control population. Patients in RPA class III treated with radiation and tirapazamine at the 159-mg/m(2) dose had a longer survival when compared with the historical controls. The improvement in survival did not reach statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable in both treatment arms, but grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the higher dose regimen.     

Radiotherapy is effective in patients with glioblastoma multiforme with a limited prognosis and in patients above 70 years of age: a retrospective single institution analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with a limited prognosis and in patients older than 70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 202 patients with GBM treated between 1990 and 2000 in a single institution. Patients (including patients >or=70 years) were assigned to RPA groups and their survival was compared with RTOG data. RESULTS: Median survival was 8.0 months for the total group and 13.9, 10.6, 3.8, 2.1 months for RPA group III (n=17), IV (n=87), V (n=60) and VI (n=38), respectively. Median survival for patients >or=70 years was 3.6 vs. 8.1 months for 50--70 years and 11.0 months for <50. In each separate RPA group, patients >or=70 years had a similar survival compared to patients of 50--70 years. Irradiated patients (66%) survived significantly longer than non-irradiated patients: 10.6 vs. 1.9 months (P<0.0001). In RPA group V the median survival for irradiated patients was 9.4 vs. 2.1 months for non-irradiated patients. In a multivariate analysis, RT remained the only prognostic factor for survival (HR 8.9, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis for patients above 70 years of age is not different from younger patients, when analyzed for separate RPA groups. For patients with a poor prognosis (i.e. RPA group V), radiotherapy improves survival significantly.     

Radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis, stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis method

PURPOSE: To estimate the potential improvement in survival for patients with brain metastases, stratified by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class and treated with radiosurgery (RS) plus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis of the RS databases of 10 institutions identified patients with brain metastates treated with RS and WBRT. Patients were stratified into 1 of 3 RPA classes. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and proportional hazard regression analysis. A comparison of survival by class was carried out with the RTOG results in similar patients receiving WBRT alone. RESULTS: Five hundred two patients were eligible (261 men and 241 women, median age 59 years, range 26-83). The overall median survival was 10.7 months. A higher Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.0001), a controlled primary (median survival = 11.6 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.0023), absence of extracranial metastases (median survival 13.4 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.0001), and lower RPA class (median survival 16.1 months for class I vs. 10.3 months for class II vs. 8.7 months for class III, p = 0.000007) predicted for improved survival. Gender, age, primary site, radiosurgery technique, and institution were not prognostic. The addition of RS boosted results in median survival (16.1, 10.3, and 8.7 months for classes I, II, and III, respectively) compared with the median survival (7.1, 4.2, and 2.3 months, p <0.05) observed in the RTOG RPA analysis for patients treated with WBRT alone. CONCLUSION: In the absence of randomized data, these results suggest that RS may improve survival in patients with BM. The improvement in survival does not appear to be restricted by class for well-selected patients.     

Age as an independent prognostic factor in patients with glioblastoma: a radiation therapy oncology group and American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base comparison

Glioblastoma (GBM) is rare in early adulthood and little information is available on this subgroup. We investigated whether young age (18-30 years) had an independent effect on survival. We retrospectively reviewed patients from two large databases: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). In the RTOG evaluation, we analyzed all eligible GBM cases from 17 RTOG studies from 1974 to 2002. All patients with GBM during 1985-1998 in the NCDB were examined for comparison. Patients were divided into three cohorts: ages 18-30, 31-49, and ≥50. Overall survival, as a function of age (discreet and continuous), was assessed. The RTOG review included 3,136 patients: 112 (3.6%) were 18-30, 780 (24.9%) were 31-49, and 2,244 (71.6%) were ≥50. The median survival times of the three groups were 21.0, 13.5, and 9.1 months (P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in survival for younger patients was demonstrated with adjustment for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. Of the 37,260 patients analyzed in the NCDB, 796 (2.1%) were 18-30, 5,711 (15.3%) were 31-49, and 30,753 (82.5%) were ≥50. The median survival times of the three groups were 18.0, 12.8, and 6.3 months (P < 0.0001). Data were not available for RPA class from this series. GBM is rare in young adulthood, comprising 2.1-3.6% of our patients. They have superior survival, even when adjusted for RPA class. More investigations on the unique biologic and clinical characteristics of tumors in this population are needed.     

Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients

The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is unclear, and selection bias in past series has been observed. The 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) study investigated the influence of fluorescence-guided resections on outcome and generated an extensive database of GBM patients with optimized resections. We evaluated whether the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) would predict survival of these patients and whether there was any benefit from extensive resections depending on RPA class. A total of 243 per-protocol patients with newly diagnosed GBM were operated on with or without ALA and treated by radiotherapy. Postoperative MRI was obtained in all patients. Patients were allocated into RTOG-RPA classes III-V based on age, KPS, neurological condition, and mental status (as derived from the NIH Stroke Scale). Median overall survival among RPA classes III, IV, and V was 17.8, 14.7, and 10.7 months, respectively, with 2-year survival rates of 26%, 12%, and 7% (p = 0.0007). Stratified for degree of resection, survival of patients with complete resections was clearly longer in RPA classes IV and V (17.7 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.0015, and 13.7 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.0398; 2-year rates: 21.0% vs. 4.4% and 11.1% vs. 2.6%, respectively), but was not in the small subgroup of RPA class III patients (19.3 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.14). Survival of patients from the ALA study is correctly predicted by the RTOG-RPA classes. Differences in survival depending on resection status, especially in RPA classes IV and V, support a causal influence of resection on survival.     

Validation and Predictive Power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Recursive Partitioning Analysis Classes for Malignant Glioma Patients: A Report Using RTOG 90-06

Purpose: The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes for malignant glioma patients were previously established using data on over 1500 patients entered on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials. The purpose of the current analysis was to validate the RPA classes with a new dataset (RTOG 90-06), determine the predictive power of the RPA classes, and establish the usefulness of the database norms for the RPA classes.Patients and Methods: There are six RPA classes for malignant glioma patients that comprise distinct groups of patients with significantly different survival outcome. RTOG 90-06 is a randomized Phase III study of 712 patients accrued from 1990 to 1994. The minimum potential follow-up is 18 months. The treatment arms were combined for the purpose of this analysis. There were 84, 13, 105, 240, 150, and 23 patients in the RPA Classes I–VI from RTOG 90-06, respectively.Results: The median survival times (MST) and 2-year survival rates for the six RPA classes in RTOG 90-06 are compared to those previously published. The MST and 2-year survival rates for the RTOG RPA classes were within 95% confidence intervals of the 90-06 estimates for Classes I, III, IV, and V. The RPA classes explained 43% of the variation (squared error loss). By comparison, a Cox model explains 30% of the variation. The RPA classes within RTOG 90-06 are statistically distinct with all comparisons exceeding 0.0001, except those involving Class II. A survival analysis from a prior RTOG study indicated that 72.0 Gy had superior outcome to literature controls; analysis of this data by RPA classes indicates the survival results were not superior to the RTOG database norms.Conclusion: The validity of the model is verified by the reliability of the RPA classes to define distinct groups with respect to survival. Further evidence is given by prediction of MST and 2-year survival for all classes except Class II. The RPA classes explained a good portion of the variation in survival outcome in the data. Lack of correlation in RPA Class II between datasets may be an artifact of the small sample size or an indication that this class is not distinct. The validation of the RPA classes attests to their usefulness as historical controls for the comparison of future Phase II results.     

Results of whole brain radiotherapy and recursive partitioning analysis in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

PURPOSE: To determine the benefit of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and the use of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 46 consecutive patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma who were treated with WBRT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1983 and 2000. We reviewed their charts for patient and tumor characteristics and categorized them according to the RTOG RPA classes. RESULTS: The median follow-up and survival time for all 46 patients (15 women and 31 men) was 3.0 months. The median radiation dose was 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. Patients who received higher radiation doses (>3000 cGy) survived longer than those who received 3000 cGy or less than 3000 cGy (8.5 months vs. 2.7 months vs. 0.4 months, p = 0.0289). However, the Karnofsky performance status and RPA class were confounding factors in these data. The median survival for patients by RTOG RPA class was 8.5 months for Class I (n = 2), 3 months for Class II (n = 37), and 0.6 months for Class III (n = 7, p = 0.0834). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients who receive WBRT alone, it appears that they benefit from this palliative treatment. The RTOG RPA classification system may be a useful tool in assessing prognosis in this patient population.     

Phase II radiation therapy oncology group trial of weekly paclitaxel and conventional external beam radiation therapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE: Fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) +/- carmustine (BCNU) is the standard of care for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but survival results remain poor. Preclinical studies indicate synergy between RT and paclitaxel (TAX) in astrocytoma cell lines. Phase I studies in GBM have demonstrated a maximum tolerated dose for TAX of 225 mg/m(2)/3 h/week x 6, during EBRT, with no exacerbation of typical RT-induced toxicities. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) therefore mounted a Phase II study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of conventional EBRT and concurrent weekly TAX at its MTD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with histologic diagnosis of GBM were enrolled from 8/16/96 through 3/21/97 in a multi-institutional Phase II trial of EBRT and TAX 225 mg/m(2)/3 h (1-3 h before EBRT), administered the first treatment day of each RT week. Total EBRT dose was 60 Gy (200 cGy/fraction), 5 days per week. A smaller treatment field, to include gross disease plus a margin only, was used after 46 Gy. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (98%) were evaluable. Median age was 55 years (range, 28-78). Seventy-four percent were > or = 50 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes III, IV, V, VI included 10 (17%), 21 (34%), 25 (41%), and 5 (8%) patients, respectively. Gross total resection was performed in only 16%. There was no Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Hypersensitivity reactions precluding further use of TAX occurred in 4 patients. There were 2 instances of late neurotoxicity (4% Grade 3 or 4). Ninety-one percent of patients received treatment per protocol. Seventy-seven percent completed prescribed treatment (6 weeks). Of 35 patients with measurable disease, CR/PR was observed in 23%, MR in 17%, and SD in 43%. Seventeen percent demonstrated progression at first follow-up. Median potential follow-up time is 20 months. Median survival is 9.7 months, with median survivals for RPA classes III, IV, V, and VI of 16.3, 10.2, 9.5, 2.5 months, respectively. Ten patients remain alive. CONCLUSION: Concurrent full-dose EBRT and weekly high-dose TAX is feasible in the majority of GBM patients. Acute toxicity is acceptable; myelosuppression and peripheral sensory neuropathy are surprisingly modest, despite considerably higher overall dose intensity, compared to that achievable in other disease sites. Median survival by RPA class without prolonged adjuvant therapy is comparable to RTOG controls treated with standard EBRT and BCNU (1 year of BCNU).     

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy boost (SRB) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) by comparing two different regimens, single dose or fractionated treatment. Between December 1994 and January 2000, 24 patients with GBM were treated with SRB in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Fourteen patients (58%) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 10 patients (42%) with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Median interval between EBRT and SRS or FSRT was 1.4 months (range -0.4-3.9 months). Actuarial survival rates of the entire 24 patients at one and two years following SRB were 63% and 34% respectively, with median survival time of 16 months. Variables predicting survival were age, extent of surgery, re-operation and the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) classes based on recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). In comparison to historical controls, improved survival benefit after SRB was observed. The median survival times for the RTOG classes 4, 5, and 6 were 28.3, 10.3, and 6.0 months following EBRT+SRB, respectively. Expected values for these classes after EBRT are 11.1, 8.9, and 4.6 months, respectively. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the RTOG class 4. There was no difference in survival between SRS and FSRT treated groups. Late complications developed in 4 patients in the SRS group and 1 patients in the FSRT group. Our retrospective data suggest that SRB in conjunction with EBRT may improve survival in patients with GBM with median survival time of 16 months, when compared to historical controls of the RTOG data following EBRT. The addition of SRB appeared to improve the median survival most demonstrably in RTOG RPA class 4 patients. SRS and FSRT are equally effective with similar median survival, but potentially less late complications associated with FSRT. Since this is a nonrandomized study, further investigation is needed to confirm this and to determine an optimal dose/fractionation scheme.     

Prognostic factors in brain metastases: should patients be selected for aggressive treatment according to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes?

PURPOSE: To determine whether or not Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) derived prognostic classes for patients with brain metastases are generally applicable and can be recommended as rational strategy for patient selection for future clinical trials. Inclusion of time to non-CNS death as additional endpoint besides death from any cause might result in further valuable information, as survival limitation due to uncontrolled extracranial disease can be explored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors for survival and time to non-CNS death in 528 patients treated at a single institution with radiotherapy or surgery plus radiotherapy for brain metastases. For this purpose, patients were divided into groups with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <70% and KPS > or =70%, as proposed by the RTOG. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 2.9 months (2.0 months for patients with KPS <70% and 3.6 months for patients with KPS > or =70%, p < 0.001). We did not find other variables splitting patients with KPS <70% in different prognostic groups. However, advanced age, multiple brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastases, and uncontrolled primary tumor each predicted shorter survival in patients with KPS > or =70%. When grouped into the original RTOG RPA classes, our data set split into three subgroups with different prognosis and median survival times of 10.5, 3.5, and 2 months, respectively (p < 0.05). Only 3% of patients fell into the most favorable group. Median time to non-CNS death was 4.1 months (12.9 months in RPA class I, 4.9 months in RPA class II, and 3.8 months in RPA class III, respectively, p > 0.05 for RPA class II versus III). However, it was 8.5 months in RPA class II patients with controlled primary tumor, which was found to be the only prognostic factor for time to non-CNS death in patients with KPS > or =70%. In patients with KPS <70%, no statistically significant prognostic factors were identified for this endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some differences, this analysis essentially confirmed the value of RPA-derived prognostic classes, as published by the RTOG, when survival was chosen as endpoint. RPA class I patients seem to be most likely to profit from aggressive treatment strategies and should be included in appropriate clinical trials. However, their number appears to be very limited. Considering time to non-CNS death, our results suggest that certain patients in RPA class II also might benefit from increased local control of brain metastases.     

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) previously developed three prognostic classes for brain metastases using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of a large database. These classes were based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status, presence of extracranial system metastases, and age. An analysis of RTOG 91-04, a randomized study comparing two dose-fractionation schemes with a comparison to the established RTOG database, was considered important to validate the RPA classes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 445 patients were randomized on RTOG 91-04, a Phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus accelerated fractionation. No difference was observed between the two treatment arms with respect to survival. Four hundred thirty-two patients were included in this analysis. The majority of the patients were under age 65, had KPS 70-80, primary tumor controlled, and brain-only metastases. The initial RPA had three classes, but only patients in RPA Classes I and II were eligible for RTOG 91-04. RESULTS: For RPA Class I, the median survival time was 6. 2 months and 7.1 months for 91-04 and the database, respectively. The 1-year survival was 29% for 91-04 versus 32% for the database. There was no significant difference in the two survival distributions (p = 0.72). For RPA Class II, the median survival time was 3.8 months for 91-04 versus 4.2 months for the database. The 1-year survival was 12% and 16% for 91-04 and the database, respectively (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that the RPA classes are valid and reliable for historical comparisons. Both the RTOG and other clinical trial organizers should currently utilize this RPA classification as a stratification factor for clinical trials.     

Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for patients with four or more intracranial metastases treated with radiosurgery

The purpose of this study was to devise a new recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patients with four or more intracranial metastases treated with a single radiosurgery procedure to identify a class of patients with extended survival. 205 patients underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases (median = 5, range 4-18) during one session. The median total treatment volume was 6.8 cc (range 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with WB-RT (46%), or after failure of WB-RT (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range 12-20 Gy). RPA assessed the effects of age, Karnofsky >70, extracranial disease, visceral metastases, number of metastases, total treatment volume, history of breast and melanoma primaries on survival. The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. RPA identified a favorable subgroup of 78 patients (43% of the series) with a total treatment volume <7 cc and < 7 brain metastases (Class 1), with a median survival of 13 months. This subgroup's survival was significantly better (p <0.00005) than the remaining patients (Class 2) (n=111) with a median survival of 6 months. In conclusion, RPA of multiple brain metastasis patients identified 2 distinct cohorts of patients. Class 1 patients have a total treatment volume <7 cc and < 7 metastases (4-6) with favorable survival after Radiosurgery and Class 2 patients have a total treatment volume > or = 7 cc and/or > or = 7 metastases and have a significantly poorer survival.     

Survival Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme

Introduction: To evaluate the survival of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Material and Methods: Patients witha pathological diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) between 1 January 1994 and 30 November 2013, wereretrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with confirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients were treatedby multimodality therapy. Exclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with unconfirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients with spinalinvolvement, 3) GBM patients with incomplete data records. Seventy-seven patients were treated by multimodalitytherapy such as surgery plus post-operative radiotherapy (PORT), post-operative Temozolomide (TMZ) concurrent withradiotherapy (CCRT), post-operative CCRT with adjuvant TMZ. The overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meiermethod and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to bestatistically significant. Results: Seventy-seven patients with a median age of 53 years (range 4-76 years) showeda median survival time (MST) of 12 months. In subgroup analyses, the PORT patients revealed a MST of 11 monthsand 2 year overall survival (OS) rates were 17.2%, the patients with post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvantTMZ revealed a MST of 23 months and 2 year OS rates were 38.2%. The MST of patients by Recursive PartitioningAnalysis (RPA), classifications III, IV, V, VI were 26.8 months, 14.2 months, 9.9 months, and 4.0 months, (p <0.001).Conclusions: The MST of the patients who had post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvant TMZ was better thanthe PORT group. The RPA classification can be used to predict survival. Multimodality therapy demonstrated the mosteffective treatment outcome. Temozolomide might be beneficial for GBM patients in order to increase survival time.     

Results of the whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer: the RTOG RPA intra-classes analysis

We evaluated the overall survival with respect to prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer in order to assess the RTOG RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification value and to perform intra-classes analyses including pretreatment and treatment-related variables. Between 1986 and 1997, 322 consecutive patients with BM from lung cancer were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Patients' distribution according to the RTOG RPA classes was: Class 1--13%, Class 2--67% and Class 3--20%. Prognostic value of the following variables was tested: RTOG RPA classes, performance status, age, extracranial metastases, control of the primary tumour, gender, histology, number of BM and interval from diagnosis to the development of BM. Intra-classes analyses were performed including radiation dose and surgery of BM. Median survival was 4.0 months. Median survival for RTOG RPA classes 1, 2 and 3 were 5.2, 4.0 and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Extracranial metastases, performance status, control of the primary and RTOG RPA classes were prognostic for survival. Within class 2 higher radiation dose, female, no extracranial metastases and surgery of BM were related to the improved survival. RTOG RPA classes maintain their prognostic significance for patients with BM from lung cancer not participating in clinical trials.     

Phase II, two-arm RTOG trial (94-11) of bischloroethyl-nitrosourea plus accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (64.0 or 70.4 Gy) based on tumor volume (> 20 or ≤ 20 cm, respectively) in the treatment of newly-diagnosed radiosurgery-ineligible glioblastoma multiforme patients

Purpose: To compare survivorship, and acute and delayed toxicities following radiation therapy (RT) of radiosurgery-ineligible glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with tumor volume-influenced, high-dose accelerated, hyperfractionated RT plus bischloroethyl-nitrosourea (BCNU), using prior RTOG malignant glioblastoma patients as historical controls.

Methods and Materials: One hundred four of 108 patients accrued from June 1994 through May 1995 from 26 institutions were analyzable. Patients were histologically confirmed with GBM, and previously untreated. Treatment assignment (52 patients/arm) was based on tumor mass (TM), defined as the product of the maximum diameter and greatest perpendicular dimension of the titanium-gadolinium-enhanced postoperative MRI: Arm A, 64 Gy, TM > 20 cm²; or Arm B, 70.4 Gy, TM ≤ 20 cm². Both Arms A and B received BCNU (80 mg/m², under hyperhydration) days 1–3, 56–58, then 4 cycles, each 8 weeks, for a total of 6 treatment series.

Results: During the 24 months immediately post-treatment, the overall median survival was 9.1 months in Arm A (64 Gy) and 11.0 months in Arm B (70.4 Gy). Median survival in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class III/IV was 10.4 months in Arm A and 12.2 months in Arm B, while RPA Class V/VI was 7.6 months in Arm A and 6.1 months in Arm B. There were no grade 4 neurological toxicities in Arm A; 2 grade 4 neurological toxicities were observed in Arm B (1 motor deficit, 1 necrosis at 157 days post-treatment).

Conclusion: This strategy of high-dose, accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy shortens overall RT treatment times while allowing dose escalation, and it provides the potential for combination with currently available, as well as newer, chemotherapy agents. Survival is comparable with previously published RTOG data, and toxicities are within acceptable limits.     

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for small-cell lung cancer-only brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) developed a prognostic classification based on a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patient pretreatment characteristics from three completed brain metastases randomized trials. Clinical trials for patients with brain metastases generally exclude small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases. We hypothesize that the RPA classes are valid in the setting of SCLC brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 154 SCLC patients with brain metastases treated between April 1983 and May 2005 was performed. RPA criteria used for class assignment were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status (PT), presence of extracranial metastases (ED), and age. RESULTS: Median survival was 4.9 months, with 4 patients (2.6%) alive at analysis. Median follow-up was 4.7 months (range, 0.3-40.3 months). Median age was 65 (range, 42-85 years). Median KPS was 70 (range, 40-100). Number of patients with controlled PT and no ED was 20 (13%) and with ED, 27 (18%); without controlled PT and ED, 34 (22%) and with ED, 73 (47%). RPA class distribution was: Class I: 8 (5%); Class II: 96 (62%); Class III: 51 (33%). Median survivals (in months) by RPA class were: Class I: 8.6; Class II: 4.2; Class III: 2.3 (p = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Survivals for SCLC-only brain metastases replicate the results from the RTOG RPA classification. These classes are therefore valid for brain metastases from SCLC, support the inclusion of SCLC patients in future brain metastases trials, and may also serve as a basis for historical comparisons.     

Acute urinary toxicity following transperineal prostate brachytherapy using a modified Quimby loading method.

PURPOSE: To examine the acute urinary toxicity following transperineal prostate implant using a modified Quimby loading method with regard to time course, severity, and factors that may be associated with a higher incidence of morbidity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with prostate adenocarcinoma treated with brachytherapy from 1997 through 1999 had follow-up records available for review. Patients considered for definitive brachytherapy alone included those with prostate specific antigen (PSA) < or = 6, Gleason score (GS) < or = 6, clinical stage < T2b, and prostate volumes generally less than 40 cc. Patients with larger prostate volumes were given neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. Those with GS > 6, PSA > 6, or Stage > T2a were treated with external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy boost. Sources were loaded according to a modified Quimby method. At each follow-up, toxicity was graded based on a modified RTOG urinary toxicity scale. RESULTS: Acute urinary toxicity occurred in 88%. Grade I toxicity was reported in 23%, grade II in 45%, and grade III in 20%, with 14% requiring prolonged (greater than 1 week) intermittent or indwelling catheterization. Overall median duration of symptoms was 12 months. There was no difference in duration of symptoms between patients treated with I-125 or Pd-103 sources (p = 0.71). After adjusting for GS and PSA, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed higher incidence of grade 3 toxicity in patients with larger prostate volumes (p = 0.002), and those with more seeds implanted (p < 0.001). Higher incidence of prolonged catheterization was found in patients receiving brachytherapy alone (p = 0.01), with larger prostate volumes (p = 0.01), and those with more seeds implanted (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer leads to a high incidence of acute urinary toxicity, most of which is mild to moderate in severity. A prolonged need for catheterization can occur in some patients. Patients receiving brachytherapy alone, those with prostate volumes greater than 30 cc, and those implanted with a greater number of seeds have the highest incidence of significant toxicity.     

Prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score for glioblastoma multiforme patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide

Introduction

To evaluate the prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), the combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin, in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (GPS).

Methods

Data of newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with partial brain RT and concurrent and adjuvant TMZ were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were grouped into three according to the GPS criteria: GPS-0: CRP?<?10 mg/L and albumin?>?35 g/L; GPS-1: CRP?<?10 mg/L and albumin?<?35 g/L or CRP?>?10 mg/L and albumin?>?35 g/L; and GPS-2: CRP?>?10 mg/L and albumin?<?35 g/L. Primary end-point was the association between the GPS groups and the overall survival (OS) outcomes.

Results

A total of 142 patients were analyzed (median age: 58 years, 66.2% male). There were 64 (45.1%), 40 (28.2%), and 38 (26.7%) patients in GPS-0, GPS-1, and GPS-2 groups, respectively. At median 15.7 months follow-up, the respective median and 5-year OS rates for the whole cohort were 16.2 months (95% CI 12.7–19.7) and 9.5%. In multivariate analyses GPS grouping emerged independently associated with the median OS (P?<?0.001) in addition to the extent of surgery (P?=?0.032), Karnofsky performance status (P?=?0.009), and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG RPA) classification (P?<?0.001). The GPS grouping and the RTOG RPA classification were found to be strongly correlated in prognostic stratification of GBM patients (correlation coefficient: 0.42; P?<?0.001).

Conclusions

The GPS appeared to be useful in prognostic stratification of GBM patients into three groups with significantly different survival durations resembling the RTOG RPA classification.

     

Does stereotactic eligibility for the treatment of glioblastoma cause selection bias in randomized studies?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential selection bias using stereotactic eligibility as a criteria for participation in studies of glioblastoma multiforme. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-06 comparing 60 Gy in 30 fractions with BCNU and 72 Gy in 60 fractions with BCNU was analyzed based on eligibility criteria used to enter patients on RTOG 93-05 using a stereotactic boost for patients with glioblastoma. Five hundred nine patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma multiforme were analyzed; of these, 137 met criteria for 93-05 and 372 did not. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to evaluate for differences. The RPA distribution in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-eligible and -ineligible patients was similar. The median survival for RPA class 3 SRS-eligible patients was 1.4 years and -ineligible patients 1.4 years. For RPA class 4, the median survival was 1.0 years for eligible patients and 0.9 years for ineligible patients (P = 0.0421). For class 5 patients, the median survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months (P = 0.09). RPA class 6 patients had a median survival of 1.7 months versus 2.7 months for ineligible patients (P = 0.199). By analyzing previously randomized patients in a study not using a stereotactic boost, there does not appear to be a survival benefit for those patients who fit the criteria for consideration of a stereotactic boost in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.