Treatment of sequelae of radial head fractures with a bipolar radial head prosthesis: Good outcome after 1–4 years follow-up in 11 patients

Background?In the presence of additional disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments, the interosseous membrane, or the lateral- and/or medial collateral ligament, radial head fractures treated by resection will result in valgus elbow instability, proximal radial migration and/or posterolateral rotatory instability. Radial head replacement has been used to treat or prevent this. We report our experience with the Judet CRF II radial head prosthesis.

Patients and methods?We treated 11 patients with a bipolar radial head prosthesis because of elbow instability after previous treatment for Mason-Johnston type III or IV radial head fractures. The outcome was assessed clinically using two standardized elbow function assessment scales, and radiographically after a mean follow-up of 2 years.

Results?Clinical outcome was either good or excellent in all patients; all elbows were stable. Radiographically, there were no signs of loosening, fracture or heterotopic ossification. 2 patients required reoperation for subluxation of the prosthesis; both were treated by reducing the size of the modular head of the prosthesis. There was erosion of the capitellum in 1 patient.

Interpretation?Bipolar radial head replacement can be used successfully for treatment of the sequelae of radial head fractures. The long-term outcome is, however, unknown.

?     

Comminuted fractures of the radial head and neck: is fixation to the shaft necessary?

Mason type III fractures of the radial head are treated by open reduction and internal fixation, resection or prosthetic joint replacement. When internal fixation is performed, fixation of the radial head to the shaft is difficult and implant-related complications are common. Furthermore, problems of devascularisation of the radial head can result from fixation of the plate to the radial neck. In a small retrospective study, the treatment of Mason type III fractures with fixation of the radial neck in 13 cases (group 2) was compared with 12 cases where no fixation was performed (group 1). The mean clinical and radiological follow-up was four years (1 to 9). The Broberg-Morrey index showed excellent results in both groups. Degenerative radiological changes were seen more frequently in group 2, and removal of the implant was necessary in seven of 13 cases. Post-operative evaluation of these two different techniques revealed similar ranges of movement and functional scores. We propose that anatomical reconstruction of the radial head without metalwork fixation to the neck is preferable, and the outcome is the same as that achieved with the conventional technique. In addition degenerative changes of the elbow joint may develop less frequently, and implant removal is not necessary.     

Screw fixation of the radial head: radiological assessment of the proximal radio-ulnar joint and average radial head diameter—an anatomic study

Introduction  

Anatomical study of 11 radii heads was done.     

Unreconstructible radial head fracture: resection, implant of Swanson or prosthesis? Retrospective comparative study

Treatment of unreconstructible comminuted fractures of the radial head remains a therapeutic challenge. Thirty two patients sustained unreconstructible radial head fracture between 1969 and 1999 and have been treated by resection (16 patients), by Swanson implant (8 patients), or by Judet prosthesis (8 patients). The three groups of patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically by two surgeons not involved in their treatment. Functional outcomes of the elbow (Morrey scoring-SOO scoring system, instability, cubitus valgus) and involvement of the wrist (pain, grasp, RUD instability) were evaluated with a mean follow up of 15 years (6-27.7). Elbow or wrist arthritis, ulnar variance, and evolution of Swanson implants were evaluated on standard radiographs. The Judet prosthesis group was evaluated with DASH scoring. Half of the patients were male and 1/3 had a work-related injury. Regarding the following criteria, there was no significant difference between the resection and the Swanson group: Morrey scoring 77/100, SOO scoring 7.4/11, mean flexion was 130 degrees, mean deficient extension was 18 degrees, mean pronation 60 degrees, mean supination 67 degrees, grasp reached 90% of the controlateral side. Arthritis was noted with the same frequency at the elbow (87%), and wrist levels (66%) in each group. Ninety four percent (94%) of patients in the resection group and 89% in the Swanson group were satisfied. Excellent and good results were reported more frequently in the Swanson group (37% resection group, 51% Swanson group). In the resection group the following complications were significantly more frequent: ulnar nerve irritation (2 x), ulnar head dislocation (2 x), ulnar head instability (3 x), para articular ossification (5 x), ulnar variance positive in all cases (mean value 3.20 mm). In the Swanson group only two implants were found to be destroyed at follow-up. In the prosthesis group function and satisfaction were higher than the two other groups but with a shorter follow up. Excellent and good results were reported in 62.5% cases with a DASH scoring between 0 and 16.7. Comminuted fractures of the radial head treated by resection or Swanson implant are both followed by fair results (same functional scoring). Only the level of complications differs between groups: at elbow level for Swanson group, at wrist level for the resection group. Patients in the Swanson group were most frequently satisfied. Metal radial head implant is an attractive solution yielding good functional outcomes in recent reported limited series and in our personal experience, but with a very short follow-up.