Rate of inhibitor development in previously untreated hemophilia A patients treated with plasma‐derived or recombinant factor VIII concentrates: a systematic review

Summary. Background: Different rates of inhibitor development after either plasma‐derived (pdFVIII) or recombinant (rFVIII) FVIII have been suggested. However, conflicting results are reported in the literature. Objectives: To systematically review the incidence rates of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A treated with either pdFVIII or rFVIII and to explore the influence of both study and patient characteristics. Methods: Summary incidence rates (95% confidence interval) from all included studies for both pdFVIII and rFVIII results were recalculated and pooled. Sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the effect of study design, severity of disease and inhibitor characteristics. Meta‐regression and analysis‐of‐variance were used to investigate the effect of covariates (testing frequency, follow‐up duration and intensity of treatment). Results: Two thousand and ninety‐four patients (1167 treated with pdFVIII, 927 with rFVIII; median age, 9.6 months) from 24 studies were investigated and 420 patients were observed to develop inhibitors. Pooled incidence rate was 14.3% (10.4–19.4) for pdFVIII and 27.4% (23.6–31.5) for rFVIII; high responding inhibitor incidence rate was 9.3% (6.2–13.7) for pdFVIII and 17.4% (14.2–21.2) for rFVIII. In the multi‐way anova study design, study period, testing frequency and median follow‐up explained most of the variability, while the source of concentrate lost statistical significance. It was not possible to analyse the effect of intensity of treatment or trigger events such as surgery, and to completely exclude multiple reports of the same patient or changes of concentrate. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to address whether or not the risk of inhibitor in PUPs with hemophilia A differs between rFVIII and pdFVIII.     

Surgery and inhibitor development in hemophilia A: a systematic review

Summary. Background: Although the association between intensive treatment and the formation of inhibiting antibodies towards factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A has been demonstrated, the contributing effect of surgery is presently unclear. The release of immunological danger signals resulting from tissue damage during surgery in the presence of a high FVIII antigen load may elicit the formation of FVIII antibodies. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the role of surgery in the inhibitor risk associated with intensive treatment as compared with treatment for bleeding and prophylactic administration of FVIII. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed that identified four cohort studies and three case control studies, comprising 342 inhibitor patients among a total of 957 hemophilia A patients. Results: Intensive treatment increased the inhibitor risk, most pronounced with intensive treatment of ≥ 5 exposure days (EDs) compared with < 3 EDs (OR, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6–6.5). Pooled odds ratio for inhibitor development in severe hemophilia patients that received intensive treatment for surgery at first exposure was 4.1 (95% confidence interval, 2.0–8.4) compared with treatment for bleeding or prophylaxis. Information on continuous infusion, previously treated patients and non‐severe hemophilia A was insufficient for valid meta‐analyses. Conclusions: Intensive FVIII treatment for surgery at first exposure leads to a higher inhibitor risk in hemophilia A patients compared with intensive treatment for bleeding.     

Treatment characteristics and the risk of inhibitor development: a multicenter cohort study among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A

CONTEXT: The development of inhibitory antibodies against infused factor (F) VIII is a major complication of treatment of patients with severe hemophilia A. OBJECTIVE: This study was set up to examine the effects of treatment-related factors on inhibitor development among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: In this multicenter cohort study, we combined individual patient data obtained from four recombinant FVIII product registration studies (Kogenate, Kogenate Bayer, Recombinate, ReFacto) that were performed between 1989 and 2001. From the databases we selected all 236 previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who were subsequently treated with FVIII on at least 50 days.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least two positive inhibitor titers and a decreased recovery. RESULTS: 67 patients (28%) developed clinically relevant inhibitors (44 high-titer) at a median of ten exposure days. Age at first exposure was not associated with inhibitor development. Peak treatment moments and surgical procedures were related to an increased inhibitor risk [adjusted relative risk 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6) and 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.3-5.7), respectively]. A shorter duration between exposure days was associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development. There was a possible association between dosing of FVIII and inhibitor development, which largely disappeared after adjustment for confounding factors. INTERPRETATION: These findings show that intensive treatment periods are associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. Our results do not support the notion that age at first exposure is associated with the risk of developing inhibitors.     

Harmonization of clinical trial guidelines for assessing the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A treatment

Summary. At the present time, the most significant complication of hemophilia therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to factor (F) VIII, which adds greatly to the difficulty and expense of preventing and treating bleeding episodes. Both patient‐related and therapy‐related variables contribute to the development of inhibitors. The multifactorial nature of inhibitor development and the relatively small numbers of patients that participate in clinical trials make it difficult to accurately assess the risk of inhibitor development. Adding to that challenge is the lack of a uniform standard of design for conducting clinical trials to evaluate the safety of FVIII products. This hinders the comparison of products and is an obstacle to the meta‐analysis necessary to make statistically valid assessments of inhibitor risk. This article reviews similarities and differences in clinical trial guidelines of European and US regulatory agencies and discusses the need for their harmonization to facilitate the assessment of FVIII products.     

Factor VIII products and inhibitor development in previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia A: a systematic review

Essentials

• Data on product‐related immunogenicity in previously treated haemophilia A patients is scarce.
• A systematic review and meta‐analysis of all currently available evidence was conducted.
• The overall incidence rate was 2.06 per 1000 person‐years (95% confidence interval: 1.06‐4.01).
• Some recombinant factor VIII products were associated with increased immunogenicity.

Summary

Background

Patients with severe hemophilia A who have been treated extensively with factor VIII products have a low but potentially serious risk of inhibitor development. It is unknown why these patients develop inhibitors, and data on product‐related immunogenicity are scarce.

Aims

To summarize the currently available evidence on the relationship between inhibitor development and recombinant FVIII product type in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A.

Methods

Longitudinal studies were included that reported on de novo inhibitor formation in patients with baseline FVIII activity levels of < 0.02 IU mL^?1 who had been treated with FVIII for at least 50 days. Pooled incidence rates of inhibitor development according to product types were calculated with a random intercept Poisson regression model.

Results

Forty‐one independent cohorts were included; 39 patients developed de novo inhibitors during 19 157 person‐years of observation. The overall incidence rate was 2.06 per 1000 person‐years, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.06–4.01. According to product type, the pooled incidence rates were 0.99 (95% CI 0.37–2.70) per 1000 person‐years for patients treated with Advate, 5.86 (95% CI 0.25–134.92) per 1000 person‐years for those treated with Kogenate/Helixate, 1.35 (95% CI 0.66–2.77) per 1000 person‐years for those treated with Kogenate FS/Helixate NexGen, 12.05 (95% CI 1.53–94.78) per 1000 person‐years for those treated with Refacto, and 4.64 (95% CI 0.82–26.43) per 1000 person‐years for those treated with Refacto AF.

Conclusion

These results suggest that some products may be associated with increased immunogenicity. However, the low incidence of inhibitors in PTPs and the differences in study design may cause significant variation in estimates of risk.

     

Mortality in congenital hemophilia A – a systematic literature review

Against a background of a rapidly evolving treatment landscape, a contemporary, evidence‐based consolidated understanding of mortality in people with congenital hemophilia A (PwcHA) is lacking. This systematic literature review examines the available data on mortality and causes of death in PwcHA to enable a better understanding of fatalities in PwcHA and evaluate the impact of new treatment paradigms on mortality. A systematic literature review of observational studies was conducted by searching Medline, Embase, and clinical trials registries for articles published from January 2010 to March 2020, using the search terms: hemophilia A (HA), mortality, cause of death. Interventional studies, studies not reporting fatalities, and those reporting only on hemophilia B, acquired HA, or mixed other coagulopathies were excluded. Overall, 7818 unique records were identified and 17 were analyzed. Of these, six reported mortality rates and five reported mortality ratios. Mortality generally decreased over time, despite a spike associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the 1980s and 1990s. Mortality was strongly correlated with age and hemophilia severity. People with hemophilia had a raised mortality risk compared with the general population, particularly in severe hemophilia, and when infected with HIV or HCV. Causes of death varied across populations, countries, and time in 15 identified studies; however, incomplete and heterogeneous reporting limits evidence. Hemorrhage, HIV, HCV, and hepatic disease were the leading causes of death. A unified approach to reporting mortality and cause of death is needed to understand mortality in PwcHA as treatments continue to advance.     

Intensive exposure to factor VIII is a risk factor for inhibitor development in mild hemophilia A

Summary.  Background : Inhibitors are rare in boys with mild hemophilia A (MHA; factor (F)VIII:C > 5%) but may arise following intense FVIII exposure, e.g. continuous infusion (CI). Objectives : To determine the impact of intense FVIII exposure in inhibitor formation in MHA at our institution and to compare this with previous reports. Patients and methods : We reviewed FVIII exposure and inhibitor development in boys (ages 0–18 years) with MHA followed at our institution from 1996 to 2001 and conducted a Medline search (1966–2002) on the experience of inhibitor development following intensive/CI exposure to FVIII. Results : We identified 54 boys with MHA. Twenty-nine (54%) had been exposed to FVIII. Seven had received FVIII by CI. Four developed inhibitors; three high titer (at ages 10 years, 16 years and 17 years) and one low titer (at 1 month old). All four had received a CI of recombinant (r) FVIII of at least 6 days within 6 weeks of developing inhibitors. Baseline FVIII levels fell to < 1% in all cases and the three with high-titer inhibitors developed severe bleeding. Immune tolerance therapy (ITT) was attempted in two boys and was successful in one. Our literature search identified 35 cases (only four children) with MHA developing inhibitors following intense FVIII exposure often in the context of surgery. Conclusions : The incidence of inhibitors in our MHA population was 7.4%. If expressed according to exposure the incidence was significantly higher: 14% (4/29) for any exposure to FVIII and 57% (4/7) for exposure by CI. A prospective study to address whether CI is associated with an increased incidence of inhibitor development in MHA is warranted.     

Human recombinant DNA-derived antihemophilic factor in the treatment of previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: final report on a hallmark clinical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Development of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement therapy represents a milestone in the treatment of hemophilia A. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this long-term, multicenter study was to assess the safety, efficacy and rate of inhibitor formation of rFVIII (Kogenate) in the treatment of hemophilia A in a group of previously untreated patients (PUPs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1989 and October 1997, 102 evaluable patients (mean age 3.9 years) were treated with rFVIII as sole therapy for prophylaxis against bleeding or for hemorrhage. Patients with mild hemophilia were treated for > or =2 years, while those with moderate or severe hemophilia were treated for > or =5 years or 100 exposure days. RESULTS: All patients responded well to therapy, so that 82% of bleeding episodes required a single infusion for treatment. Only four mild drug-related adverse events were recorded during the study for an overall rate of 0.03% (4/13 464 infusions). No viral seroconversions were observed. The inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia was 29% (19/65). Overall, inhibitory antibodies developed in 21 patients (20.6%). Inhibitor titers were low (<10 Bethesda Units) in nine of the 21 patients despite continued episodic treatment with rFVIII and transient in eight patients receiving episodic treatment (seven low titer, one high titer). Eight high-titer inhibitor patients were treated with immune-tolerance induction therapy; five had successful outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The observed incidence of inhibitor formation is similar to studies of PUPs receiving plasma-derived FVIII. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of rFVIII in long-term treatment of hemophilia A.     

Laboratory testing in hemophilia: Impact of factor and non‐factor replacement therapy on coagulation assays

The advent of extended half‐life (EHL) recombinant clotting factors and innovative non‐factor replacement therapeutics, such as emicizumab, offers several advantages over existing products for the prophylactic treatment of people living with hemophilia (PwH). These include low annual bleeding rates with less frequent dosing, higher trough plasma concentrations, and a more convenient route of administration. However, increasing use of these therapies poses challenges to clinicians and coagulation laboratories due to the lack of standardized assays for monitoring of hemostatic parameters, and the potential for misinterpretation of test results, which may jeopardize patient safety. Definitive diagnosis of hemophilia and treatment monitoring is reliant on demonstrating factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; hemophilia B) deficiency using a functional coagulation assay. The most frequently used assays are based on activated partial thromboplastin time, using a one‐stage or two‐stage process. While one‐stage and chromogenic assays have performed well with human‐derived FVIII and FIX and full‐length recombinant products, EHL recombinant factors are heterogeneous in structure and mode of action and therefore show wide variation in activity levels between different one‐stage assays, and between one‐stage and chromogenic assays. In the context of the recommended stepwise approach for laboratory diagnosis of hemophilia, we examine the diagnostic challenges associated with the use of EHL factors and novel non‐factor therapeutics and consider the optimal diagnostic approach in PwH who are receiving these treatments. Ultimately, accurate diagnostic solutions are a prerequisite for personalized therapy to minimize treatment burden and improve quality of life in PwH.     

Comparative immunogenicity of recombinant B domain‐deleted porcine factor VIII and Hyate:C in hemophilia A mice presensitized to human factor VIII

Summary. Hyate is a commercial plasma‐derived porcine factor (F)VIII concentrate that is used in the treatment of patients with inhibitory antibodies to FVIII. OBI‐1 is a recombinant B domain‐deleted form of porcine FVIII that is in clinical development for the same indication. Hemophilia A mice were presensitized with human FVIII to simulate clinical inhibitory antibody formation and then were randomized to receive OBI‐1 or Hyate:C in a comparative immunogenicity trial. OBI‐1 or Hyate:C were given in a series of four intravenous injections at weekly intervals at doses of 1, 10, or 100 U kg^?1. Inhibitory antibodies to porcine FVIII were not detected by Bethesda assay in most of the mice given OBI‐1 or Hyate:C at doses of 1 or 10 U kg^?1, but were identified in 81% and 94% of mice given 100 U kg^?1 of OBI‐1 or Hyate:C, respectively. There was no significant difference between OBI‐1 and Hyate:C in inhibitory antibody formation at any dose, although there was a trend toward a lower Bethesda titer in OBI‐1‐treated mice at 10 U kg^?1 (P = 0.09). Total anti‐FVIII antibodies to Hyate:C and OBI‐1 were also measured by ELISA using immobilized purified plasma‐derived porcine FVIII and OBI‐1, respectively, as antigens. At the 10 and 100 U kg^?1 doses, the mean anti‐FVIII response was higher in Hyate:C‐treated‐mice than in OBI‐1‐treated mice (P = 0.02 and P = 0.004, respectively). The results using this model suggest that OBI‐1 may be less immunogenic and safer than Hyate:C in FVIII inhibitor patients.     

Tailoring hemostatic therapies to lower inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A

Summary

After technological progress provided safer therapeutic products for patients with hemophilia A, the development of alloantibodies (inhibitors) neutralizing the coagulant activity of infused factor VIII (FVIII) remains the most serious complication of replacement therapy, predisposing patients to greater morbidity and causing higher treatment costs. The pathogenesis of inhibitors, which develop at a high rate in previously untreated children with severe hemophilia A, is multifactorial, resulting from complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Among non‐genetic determinants, a key role is played by treatment‐related factors, including the source of FVIII product (i.e., plasma derived or recombinant) and the mode of replacement therapy delivery (i.e., intensity, prophylaxis vs. on demand). We review the potential interventions on these modifiable factors that may help to lower the rate of inhibitor development. In addition, interest is currently directed toward the potential for lesser immunogenicity of novel hemostatic agents designed to decrease the dosing frequency or avoid/delay the need of FVIII replacement therapy.