The role of ambulatory 24‐hour esophageal manometry in clinical practice

High‐resolution manometry revolutionized the assessment of esophageal motility disorders and upgraded the classification through the Chicago Classification. A known disadvantage of standard HRM, however, is the inability to record esophageal motility function for an extended time interval; therefore, it represents only a more snapshot view of esophageal motor function. In contrast, ambulatory esophageal manometry measures esophageal motility over a prolonged period and detects motor activity during the entire circadian cycle. Furthermore, ambulatory manometry has the ability to measure temporal correlations between symptoms and motor events. This article aimed to review the clinical implications of ambulatory esophageal manometry for various symptoms, covering literature on the manometry catheter, interpretation of findings, and relevance in clinical practice specific to the evaluation of non‐cardiac chest pain, chronic cough, and rumination syndrome.     

Ileal manometry in children following ileostomies and pull-through operations

Our aim was to analyse the patterns of ileal contractions in children. We reviewed the charts of 23 children who had ileal manometry studies (16 males), mean age 7 years (range 2 months to 17 years). We positioned the manometry catheters with 4-8 recording sites, 5 or 15 cm apart, through ileostomies fashioned for clinically indicated reasons. We studied six additional children with persistent faecal soiling following endorectal pull through for Hirschsprung's disease; the catheters were positioned through the anus and colon into the ileum. We recorded phasic and tonic intermittent contractions in all the subjects, clustered contractions (rate 5-9 min-1, duration 20-120 s) in 19 subjects with ileostomies and four with endorectal pull throughs. In 13 children there were prolonged propagated contractions, > 60 mmHg in amplitude, > 15 s in duration, propagating at rates of 2-6 cm s-1 over at least 20 cm. The migrating motor complex was rare; in 55 h of fasting recording there were two phase III sequences. There are four distinctive features of ileal manometry recordings in children: random intermittent contractions, clustered contractions, prolonged propagated contractions and tonic contractions. The features of ileal motility differ from motility in the proximal small bowel.     

Motility of the left colon in children and adolescents with functional constpation; a retrospective comparison between solid‐state and water‐perfused colonic manometry

Background

Using water‐perfused (WP) high‐resolution manometry, we recently demonstrated that children with functional constipation (FC) lacked the postprandial increase in distal colonic cyclic motor patterns that was observed in healthy adults. Our aim was to determine if similar results could be detected using a solid‐state (SS) manometry catheter.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 19 children with FC (median age 11.1 years, 58% male) who underwent colonic manometry with a SS catheter (36 sensors, 3 cm apart). Data were compared with previously published data using a WP catheter (36 sensors, 1.5 cm apart) recorded from 18 children with FC (median age 15 years; 28% male).

Key Results

The cyclic motor patterns recorded by the SS catheter did not differ from those previously recorded by the WP catheter. There was no detected increase in this activity in response to the meal in either group. Long‐single motor patterns were recorded in most patients (n = 16, 84%) with the SS catheter. The number of these events did not differ from the WP recordings. In the SS data, HAPCs were observed in 4 children prior to the meal, in 5 after the meal. This did not differ significantly from the WP data.

Conclusions & Inferences

These data recorded by SS manometry did not differ from WP manometry data. Regardless of the catheter used, both studies revealed an abnormal colonic response to a meal, indicating a pathology which is not related to the catheter used to record these data.     

Esophageal provocation tests: Are they useful to improve diagnostic yield of high resolution manometry?

High resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard to diagnose esophageal motility disorders but has some limitations. The inclusion of provocative tests might enhance the diagnostic yield of HRM. These tests are easy to perform and to add to the regular manometry protocol. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS; 5 2‐mL swallows) is useful to assess the contractile reserve and deglutitive inhibition. The optimal number of MRS to perform might be 3 as suggested by Mauro et al. in this issue of Neurogastroenterology & Motility. The absence of contractile reserve might be associated with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease and with an increased risk of post fundoplication dysphagia. Single viscous and solid swallows might enhance the detection of esophageal motility disorders but are not significantly associated with symptom occurrence. Test meal has the advantage to represent a real‐life scenario and is promising to depict significant motility findings responsible for esophageal symptoms. Post‐prandial recording might also be of interest to diagnose rumination and belching disorders. The best indication of rapid drink challenge test (free drinking of 200 mL) is currently the diagnosis of esophago‐gastric junction obstruction. Finally, abdominal compression might be an option to evaluate response of esophageal peristalsis in a context of outflow resistance as proposed by Brink et al. in this issue. These provocative maneuvers appear to provide a complementary role in the evaluation of esophageal motility but require prospective studies to determine the validity of the findings and whether they will lead to changes in clinical practice.     

Solid-state vs water-perfused catheters to measure colonic high-amplitude propagating contractions

Background Solid‐state (SS) manometry catheters with portable data loggers offer many potential advantages over traditional water‐perfused (WP) systems, such as prolonged recordings in a more physiologic ambulatory setting and the lack of risk for water overload. The use of SS catheters has not been evaluated in comparison with perfused catheters in children. This study aims to compare data provided by SS and WP catheters in children undergoing colonic manometry studies. Methods A SS catheter and a WP catheter were taped together such that their corresponding sensors were at the same location. Simultaneous recordings were obtained using the SS and WP catheters (both 8 channels, 10 cm apart) in 15 children with severe defecation disorders referred for colonic manometry. Signals were recorded for a minimum of 1 h during fasting, 1 h after ingestion of a meal, and 1 h after the administration of bisacodyl. Solid‐state signals from the data logger were analyzed against the perfused signals. All high‐amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs), the most recognizable and interpreted colonic motor event, were evaluated for spatial and temporal features including their durations, amplitudes, and propagation velocities. Key Results A total of 107 HAPCs were detected with SS and 91 with WP catheters. All WP‐HAPC were also observed with SS. Linear regression analysis showed that SS catheters tended to give higher readings in the presence of amplitudes <102 mmHg and lower reading with amplitudes >102 mmHg. An opposite trend was found for the duration of contractions. No significant difference was found for HAPC velocity. Conclusions & Inferences SS catheters are more sensitive in recording HAPCs in children with defecation disorders compared with the more traditional WP assembly. There is a difference in measurements of amplitude between the two systems. Solid‐state catheters offer potential advantages over WP catheters in children, being portable, safer to use, and may provide data over a more prolonged period.     

Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high‐resolution manometry and impedance monitoring

Background Esophageal impedance monitoring has made it possible to distinguish two types of belches, designated gastric and supragastric. We aimed to compare the esophageal pressure characteristics during supragastric belches and gastric belches using combined high‐resolution manometry and impedance monitoring. Methods We included 10 patients with severe and frequent belching. Combined high‐resolution manometry and impedance monitoring was performed. Key Results Whereas gastric belching was relatively rare in all patients (median incidence 2 per 90‐min period), nine of the 10 patients exhibited excessive supragastric belching (36 in 90 min). Supragastric belches were characterized by: (i) movement of the diaphragm in aboral direction and increased esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure, (ii) decrease in esophageal pressure, (iii) upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation, (iv) antegrade airflow into the esophagus, and (v) increase in esophageal and gastric pressure leading to expulsion of air out of the esophagus in retrograde direction. In contrast, gastric belches were characterized by: (i) decreased or unchanged EGJ pressure, which was significantly lower than during supragastric belches, (ii) absence of decreased esophageal pressure preceding entrance of air into the esophagus (iii) retrograde airflow into the esophagus, (iv) common cavity phenomenon, and (v) upper esophageal sphincter relaxation after the onset of the retrograde airflow. Conclusions & Inferences In gastric belching UES relaxation is a late event, allowing efflux of air that entered the esophagus from the stomach. In most patients with supragastric belching air is brought into the esophagus by movement of the diaphragm in aboral direction, creation of negative esophageal pressure, and UES relaxation.     

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease

Background Non‐specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio‐mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined. Methods Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n = 20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n = 20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n = 20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3 cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour). Key Results Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P < 0.023 vs controls, P = 0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P = 0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P = 0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P = 0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P < 0.017 vs controls and P < 0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r = 0.52 vs 0.27). Conclusions & Inferences Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.     

Day‐to‐day reproducibility of prolonged ambulatory colonic manometry in healthy subjects

Background Although colonic manometry provides useful information regarding colonic physiology, considerable variability has been reported both for regional motility and manometric patterns. Whether colonic manometry is reproducible is not known. Methods Seven healthy volunteers (three men, four women, mean age = 34 years) underwent two studies of 24‐h ambulatory colonic manometry, each 2 weeks apart. Manometry was performed by placing a six‐sensor solid‐state probe, up to the hepatic flexure and anchored to colonic mucosa. Colonic motility was assessed by the number and area‐under‐curve (AUC) of pressure waves and motility patterns such as high‐amplitude propagating contractions (HAPC). Waking and meal‐induced gastrocolonic responses were also assessed. Paired t‐test was used to examine the reproducibility and intra and interindividual variability. Key Results The number of pressure waves and propagating pressure waves and HAPC, and AUC were similar between the two studies. Diurnal variation, waking and meal‐induced gastrocolonic responses were also reproducible. There was some variability in the incidence of individual colonic motor patterns. Conclusions & Inferences Colonic manometry findings were generally reproducible, particularly for the assessment of key physiologic changes, such as meal‐induced gastrocolonic, HAPC, and waking responses.     

3D‐high resolution manometry of the esophagogastric junction

Background The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is a complex structure that challenges accurate manometric recording. This study aimed to define EGJ pressure morphology relative to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) during respiration with 3D‐high resolution manometry (3D‐HRM). Methods A 7.5‐cm long 3D‐HRM array with 96 independent solid‐state pressure sensors (axial spacing 0.75 cm, radial spacing 45°) was used to record EGJ pressure in 15 normal subjects. Concurrent videofluoroscopy was used to localize the SCJ marked with an endoclip. Ex vivo experiments were done on the effect of bending the probe to match that seen fluoroscopically. Key Results 3D‐high resolution manometry EGJ pressure recordings were dominated by an asymmetric pressure peak superimposed on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) attributable to the crural diaphragm (CD). Median peak CD pressure at expiration and inspiration (51 and 119 mmHg, respectively) was much greater in 3D‐HRM than evident in HRM with circumferential pressure averaging. Esophagogastric junction length, defined as the zone of circumferential pressure exceeding that of adjacent esophagus or stomach was also substantially shorter (2.4 cm) than evident in conventional HRM. No consistent circumferential EGJ pressure was evident distal to the SCJ in 3D‐HRM recordings and ex vivo experiments suggested that the intra‐gastric pressure peak seen contralateral to the CD related to bending the assembly rather than the sphincter per se. Conclusions & Inferences 3D‐high resolution manometry demonstrated a profoundly asymmetric and vigorous CD component to EGJ pressure superimposed on the LES. Esophagogastric junction length was shorter than evident with conventional HRM and the distal margin of the EGJ sphincteric zone closely correlated with the SCJ.     

Prognostic yield of esophageal manometry in chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction: a retrospective cohort of 116 adult patients

Background Chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (CIPO) refers to a wide and heterogeneous group of neuromuscular disorders, which classically involve the small intestine. However, further investigation is required to determine if motility disturbances involve all parts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods Medical records and follow‐up examinations of 116 adult CIPO patients [70F, median age 28 (0–79) years] were reviewed and performed at our institution since 1980. Manometry (esophageal, small bowel and anorectal) and gastric emptying scintigraphy reports were retrieved and analyzed. Survival, home parenteral nutrition requirement, and the inability to maintain sufficient oral feeding was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Key Results The median follow‐up time was 6 (0.1–30) years. In all, 90% of patients who underwent at least one motility test, with the exception of small bowel manometry, exhibited at least one abnormal pattern. Esophageal manometry was abnormal in 73% of the cases, including 51% with severe ineffective esophageal motility. Anorectal manometry was abnormal in 59% of the cases, including only 17% with severe abnormalities. Gastric emptying was abnormal in 61% of the cases. Only esophageal motor disorders had significant predicting values for survival, home parenteral nutrition requirement, and an inability to maintain sufficient oral feeding. Conclusions & Inferences Our study showed that CIPO was associated with a diffuse involvement of all parts of the GI tract and was not restricted to the small intestine in 90% of the cases studied. Esophageal manometry had a significant prognostic yield and should be systematically performed in CIPO patients.     

Perception of dysphagia: lack of correlation with objective measurements of esophageal function

Background The mechanism underlying increased perception of food bolus passage in the absence of esophageal mechanical obstruction has not been completely elucidated. A correlation between the intensity of the symptom and the severity of esophageal dysfunction, either motility (manometry) or bolus transit (impedance) has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between objective esophageal function assessment (with manometry and impedance) and perception of bolus passage in healthy volunteers (HV) with normal and pharmacologically‐induced esophageal hypocontractility, and in patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with and without ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Methods Combined manometry‐impedance was performed in 10 HV, 19 GERD patients without IEM and nine patients with IEM. Additionally, nine HV were studied after 50 mg sildenafil, which induced esophageal peristaltic failure. Perception of each 5 mL viscous swallow was evaluated using a 5‐point scale. Manometry identified hypocontractility (contractions lower than 30 mmHg) and impedance identified incomplete bolus clearance. Key Results In HV and in GERD patients with and without IEM, there was no association between either manometry or impedance and perception on per swallow analysis (OR: 0.842 and OR: 2.017, respectively), as well as on per subject analysis (P = 0.44 and P = 0.16, respectively). Lack of correlation was also found in HV with esophageal hypocontractility induced by sildenafil. Conclusions & Inferences There is no agreement between objective measurements of esophageal function and subjective perception of bolus passage. These results suggest that increased bolus passage perception in patients without mechanical obstruction might be due to esophageal hypersensitivity.     

The effect of luminal content and rate of occlusion on the interpretation of colonic manometry

Background Manometry is commonly used for diagnosis of esophageal and anorectal motility disorders. In the colon, manometry is a useful tool, but clinical application remains uncertain. This uncertainty is partly based on the belief that manometry cannot reliably detect non‐occluding colonic contractions and, therefore, cannot identify reliable markers of dysmotility. This study tests the ability of manometry to record pressure signals in response to non‐lumen‐occluding changes in diameter, at different rates of wall movement and with content of different viscosities. Methods A numerical model was built to investigate pressure changes caused by localized, non‐lumen‐occluding reductions in diameter, similar to those caused by contraction of the gut wall. A mechanical model, consisting of a sealed pressure vessel which could produce localized reductions in luminal diameter, was used to validate the model using luminal segments formed from; (i) natural latex; and (ii) sections of rabbit proximal colon. Fluids with viscosities ranging from 1 to 6800 mPa s^?1 and luminal contraction rates over the range 5–20 mmHg s^?1 were studied. Key Results Manometry recorded non‐occluding reductions in diameter, provided that they occurred with sufficiently viscous content. The measured signal was linearly dependent on the rate of reduction in luminal diameter and also increased with increasing viscosity of content (R² = 0.62 and 0.96 for 880 and 1760 mPa s^?1, respectively). Conclusions & Inferences Manometry reliably registers non‐occluding contractions in the presence of viscous content, and is therefore a viable tool for measuring colonic motility. Interpretation of colonic manometric data, and definitions based on manometric results, must consider the viscosity of luminal content.     

High amplitude propagated contractions

While most colonic motor activity is segmental and non‐propulsive, colonic high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPC) can transfer colonic contents over long distances and often precede defecation. High amplitude propagated contractions occur spontaneously, in response to pharmacological agents or colonic distention. A subset of patients with slow transit constipation have fewer HAPC. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Rodriguez et al. report that anal relaxation during spontaneous and bisacodyl‐induced HAPC exceeds anal relaxation during rectal distention in constipated children undergoing colonic manometry. Moreover, and consistent with a neural mechanism, anal relaxation often precedes arrival of HAPC in the left colon. High amplitude propagated contractions are also used to evaluate the motor response to a meal and pharmacological stimuli (e.g., bisacodyl, neostigmine) and to identify colonic inertia during colonic motility testing in chronic constipation. This editorial comprehensively reviews the characteristics, physiology and pharmacology of HAPC, their assessment by manometry, and relevance to constipation and diarrhea.     

Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography

Background The contractile deceleration point (CDP) is an important landmark for interpreting esophageal pressure topography (EPT) plots. Previous analysis in normal subjects confirmed that the CDP could be localized using an algorithm that found the time during peristalsis at which a maximal length of the distal esophagus was contracting concurrently (tML method). This study aimed to test the tML method for localizing CDP in patients with abnormal motility. Methods High‐resolution manometry studies of 75 patients with normal and disordered peristalsis were analyzed. Two experts, JEP and YX, used the original tangent‐intersection method to score CDP coordinates for the first two swallows of each study. Alternative computerized algorithms tested against the expert were: (i) the tML method, (ii & iii) the intercept between the leading edge of the 30‐mmHg isobaric contour and a line 2.0 cm (or 10% of esophageal length) proximal to the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) at rest, or (iv) the ‘tML‐3 cm’ method, which added the stipulation that the CDP be within 3 cm of the EGJ. Key Results All tested algorithms were highly correlated with the expert. However, the tMl‐3 cm method was better in the sense that it eliminated outliers (>1 s discrepancy with the expert) that occurred with the other methods usually attributable to weak distal peristalsis. Conclusions & Inferences Optimal automated CDP localization was achieved in both normal and a spectrum of abnormal motility using the tML method with the added stipulation that the CDP be restricted to within the distal 3 cm of the EGJ at rest.     

Reproducibility of antroduodenal motility during prolonged ambulatory recording

Ambulatory recording of antroduodenal manometry is a novel technique with several advantages over standard stationary manometry recording. Although the feasibility of this technique in clinical practice has been demonstrated, reproducibility of antroduodenal motility recorded by means of ambulatory manometry has not been investigated. To test whether antroduodenal motility recorded by ambulatory manometry is reproducible, we performed two 24-h ambulatory antroduodenal manometry recordings in 18 healthy subjects according to an identical protocol with a 1-week interval. Motility was recorded with a five-channel solid-state catheter. Postprandial motility was recorded after consumption of two test meals and interdigestive motility was recorded nocturnally. Postprandial antroduodenal motor characteristics were identical between the separate recordings. The number and duration of nocturnal cycles of the interdigestive migrating motor complex were also in the same range. Phase III characteristics in general were not different between the two recordings. Only minor alterations were observed in the duration of phase III motor fronts with duodenal onset and in the number of interdigestive cycles concluded by duodenal onset phase III. Parameters obtained by qualitative analysis were comparable between the two recordings. The antroduodenal motility pattern, when measured by ambulatory recording with solid state catheters under standardized conditions, is very reproducible.     

Impact of opioids on esophageal motility

Opioids are well known to cause adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Data regarding how opioids affect the esophagus are more limited. Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) is a clinical syndrome defined by chronic opioid use (≥3 months), esophageal symptoms (mainly dysphagia), and esophageal motility abnormalities diagnosed by manometry including achalasia type III, hypercontractile esophagus, distal esophageal spasm, and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Up until now, the effect of opioids on esophageal motility assessed by the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) had not been described. In this issue of NGM, Patel et al. report that FLIP assessment in patients with esophageal symptoms showed that chronic opioid users have a significant increase in repetitive retrograde contractions, but no significant reduction in distensibility at the esophagogastric junction compared to non-users. Additionally, perceptive symptoms were higher, and quality of life metrics were lower in the chronic opioid users. This review article will discuss our current understanding of OIED and provide context for this latest study in chronic opioid users. Further investigation with larger prospective studies is needed to understand the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of OIED.     

High‐resolution esophageal pressure topography is superior to conventional sleeve manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations associated with a reflux event

Background Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the main mechanism underlying gastro‐esophageal reflux and are detected during manometric studies using well defined criteria. Recently, high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) has been introduced and is now considered as the new standard to study esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. In this study we performed a head‐to‐head comparison between HREPT and conventional sleeve manometry for the detection of TLESRs. Methods A setup with two synchronized MMS‐solar systems was used. A solid state HREPT catheter, a water‐perfused sleeve catheter, and a multi intraluminal impedance pH (MII‐pH) catheter were introduced in 10 healthy volunteers (M6F4, age 19–56). Subjects were studied 0.5 h before and 3 h after ingestion of a standardized meal. Tracings were blinded and analyzed by the three authors according to the TLESR criteria. Key Results In the HREPT mode 156 TLESRs were scored, vs 143 during sleeve manometry (P = 0.10). Hundred and twenty‐three TLESRs were scored by both techniques. Of all TLESRs (177), 138 were associated with reflux (78%). High‐resolution esophageal pressure topography detected significantly more TLESRs associated with a reflux event (132 vs 119, P = 0.015) resulting in a sensitivity for detection of TLESRs with reflux of 96% compared to 86% respectively. Analysis of the discordant TLESRs associated with reflux showed that TLESRs were missed by sleeve manometry due to low basal LES pressure (N = 5), unstable pharyngeal signal (N = 4), and residual sleeve pressure >2 mmHg (N = 10). Conclusions & Inferences The HREPT is superior to sleeve manometry for the detection of TLESRs associated with reflux. However, rigid HREPT criteria are awaited.     

The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements

Background Guidelines recommend instruction and motivation during anorectal manometry; however, its impact on findings has not been reported. This study assessed the effects of standard versus enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on the results of anorectal manometry. Methods High‐resolution manometry was performed by a solid‐state catheter with 10 circumferential sensors at 6 mm separation across the anal canal and two rectal sensors. Measurements were acquired first with standard instruction and then with enhanced instruction and verbal feedback. On both occasions, squeeze pressure and duration during three voluntary contractions and intra‐rectal pressure and recto‐anal pressure gradient (RAPG) during three attempts at simulated defecation were assessed. Key Results A total of 70 consecutive patients (54 female; age 25–82 years) referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (n = 31), constipation, and related disorders of defecation (n = 39) were studied. Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback increased maximum squeeze pressure (Δ10 ± 28.5 mmHg; P < 0.0038) and duration of contraction (Δ3 ± 4 s; P < 0.0001). During simulated defecation, it increased intra‐rectal pressure (Δ12 ± 14 mmHg; P < 0.003) and RAPG (Δ11 ± 20 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Using standard diagnostic criteria, the intervention changed manometric findings from locally validated ‘pathologic’ to ‘normal’ values in 14/31 patients with incontinence and 12/39 with disorders of defecation. Conclusions & Inferences Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback significantly improved voluntary anorectal functions and resulted in a clinically relevant change of manometric diagnosis in some patients. Effective explanation of procedures and motivation during manometry is required to ensure consistent results and to provide an accurate representation of patient ability to retain continence and evacuate stool.     

Serotonin and colonic motility

The role of serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine [5‐HT]) in gastrointestinal motility has been studied for over 50 years. Most of the 5‐HT in the body resides in the gut wall, where it is located in subsets of mucosal cells (enterochromaffin cells) and neurons (descending interneurons). Many studies suggest that 5‐HT is important to normal and dysfunctional gut motility and drugs affecting 5‐HT receptors, especially 5‐HT₃ and 5‐HT₄ receptors, have been used clinically to treat motility disorders; however, cardiovascular side effects have limited the use of these drugs. Recently studies have questioned the importance and necessity of 5‐HT in general and mucosal 5‐HT in particular for colonic motility. Recent evidence suggests the importance of 5‐HT₃ and 5‐HT₄ receptors for initiation and generation of one of the key colonic motility patterns, the colonic migrating motor complex (CMMC), in rat. The findings suggest that 5‐HT₃ and 5‐HT₄ receptors are differentially involved in two different types of rat CMMCs: the long distance contraction (LDC) and the rhythmic propulsive motor complex (RPMC). The understanding of the role of serotonin in colonic motility has been influenced by the specific motility pattern(s) studied, the stimulus used to initiate the motility (spontaneous vs induced), and the route of administration of drugs. All of these considerations contribute to the understanding and the controversy that continues to surround the role of serotonin in the gut.     

High‐resolution anorectal manometry: An expensive hobby or worth every penny?

Introduced approximately 10 years ago, high‐resolution manometry catheters have fostered interest in anorectal manometry. This review, which accompanies two articles in this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, reviews the methods, clinical indications, utility, and pitfalls of anorectal manometry and revisits the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Medical Position Statement on Anorectal Testing Techniques, which was last published in 1999. High‐resolution manometry provides a refined assessment of the anorectal pressure profile, obviates the need for station pull‐through maneuvers, and minimizes movement artifacts. In selected cases, this refined assessment may be useful for identifying structural abnormalities or anal weakness. However, many manometry patterns that were previously regarded as abnormal are also observed in a majority of healthy patients, which substantially limits the utility of manometry for identifying defecatory disorders. It is our impression that most conclusions of the AGA medical position statement from 1999 remain valid today. High‐resolution techniques have not substantially affected the number of publications on or management of anorectal disorders. The ongoing efforts of an international working group to standardize techniques for anorectal manometry are welcome. Although high‐resolution manometry is more than an expensive hobby, improvements in catheter design and further research to rigorously define and evaluate these techniques are necessary to determine if they are worth every penny.