Discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia by dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators: importance of the atrial sensing function

Although the addition of atrial sensing in dual chamber ICDs may improve the ability of the device to discriminate between supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), atrial sensing errors may also negatively affect tachycardia classification. This prospective study evaluated the incidence of atrial sensing errors in a dual chamber ICD and their impact on VT/SVT discrimination. In 145 patients, a dual chamber ICD (Defender) was implanted. Analysis of 1,241 tachycardia episodes stored during a mean follow-up of 14+/-8 months revealed atrial sensing errors in 817 (66%) episodes. Upon expert review, device-based classification was confirmed in 509 (98%) of 522 SVT episodes. No false device-based SVT classification was related to atrial sensing errors. Of 719 episodes classified as VT by the device, 645 (90%) were confirmed. There were 74 episodes of false-positive VT detection. Of these, 63 were related to atrial sensing errors: atrial undersensing in 58 (92%) and atrial oversensing in 5 (8%) episodes. Atrial sensing errors led to incorrect VT/SVT discrimination in 51 (4%) of 1,241 episodes. Only the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and abdominal site of device implantation showed a significant influence on false VT/SVT discrimination. Atrial sensing errors are frequently encountered in dual chamber ICDs. Due to the VT/SVT discrimination algorithm, atrial sensing errors only led to misclassification in 4 % of all episodes, mainly due to atrial undersensing. No VT underdetection due to atrial oversensing occurred.     

Safety and efficacy of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator capable of slow ventricular tachycardia discrimination: a randomized study

New developments in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have increased the specificity of therapy delivery. This study was performed to examine the performance of an algorithm, focusing on its ability to distinguish slow ventricular tachycardia (VT) from sinus rhythm or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The patient population included 77 men and 13 women, 63 +/- 11 years old, treated with ICDs after episodes of spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias. They were randomized to programming of the ICD to a lower limit of VT detection at 128 beats/min (group I, n = 44), versus 153 beats/min II (group II, n = 46). The primary endpoint of the study consisted of comparing the specificity and sensitivity of the algorithm between the two groups of patients. Over a 10.1 +/- 3.5 months follow-up, 325 episodes were detected in the Tachy zone in group I, versus 106 in group II. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm in group I were 98.8% and 94.4%, respectively, versus 100% and 89% in group II (NS). A single episode of VT at a rate of 132 beats/min was diagnosed as SVT in group I. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm for tachycardias <153 beats/min were 97.4% and 94.5%, respectively. Overall VT therapy efficacy was 100% in both groups. The performance of this algorithm in the slow VT zone supports the programming of a long Tachy detection interval to document slow events, and allows to treat slow VT, if necessary, without significant risk of inappropriate interventions for sinus tachycardia.     

Experience with a dual chamber implantable defibrillator

An implantable defibrillator with dual chamber pacing may have advantages for pacing, sensing, and detection of brady- and tachyarrhythmias. This study evaluates the safety and performance of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator that incorporates an algorithm to discriminate supraventricular from ventricular arrhythmias. The 300 patients in this study had the device implanted for the following indications: ventricular tachycardia (47%), sudden cardiac death survivorship (51%), and prophylactic implants (2%). Patients received dual chamber pacing for accepted bradyarrhythmic (51.7%) or investigational indications. During a mean follow-up period of 1.7 months a total of 1,092 arrhythmia episodes in 96 patients were fully documented in the device memory: 66 patients experienced a total of 796 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes and 42 experienced a total of 296 supraventricular episodes. The device appropriately detected 100% of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias while reducing the inappropriate detection of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias by 72% compared to single chamber rate only detection. The positive predictive value was 90.5% for ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection in episodes that exceeded the tachycardia detection rate. Adverse events observed in at least 2% of the patients were incisional pain (22%), inappropriate ventricular detection (7%), atrial lead dislodgement (4%), atrial oversensing/undersensing (3%), hematoma (3%), incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmia (2%), and pneumothorax (2%). There were 13 deaths, none of which were attributed to device failure. The Gem DR is safe and effective for the detection and treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The dual chamber detection algorithm appropriately recognized supraventricular tachycardia with rapid ventricular rates 72% of the time while maintaining 100% detection of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Delayed detection of ventricular tachycardia in a dual chamber rate adaptive pacing implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a case of intradevice interaction

Ventricular tachycardia detection is delayed due to concomitant programming of rate adaptive dual chamber pacing. Underlying timing cycle constraints as well as programming precautions and pitfalls are reviewed.     

The differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia

Wide complex tachycardia is defined as a cardiac rhythm with a rate greater than 100 beats/min (bpm) and a QRS complex duration greater than 0.10 to 0.12 seconds (s) in the adult patient; wide complex tachycardia (WCT) in children is defined according to age-related metrics. The differential diagnosis of the WCT includes ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant intraventricular conduction, including both relatively benign and life-threatening dysrhythmias. This review focuses on the differential diagnosis of WCT with a discussion of strategies useful in making the appropriate diagnosis, when possible.     

Broad QRS tachycardia: Electrocardiographic diagnosis and management

The diagnostic difficulties between supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with intraventricular conduction delay and ventricular tachycardia have challenged the physician since the first recording of a ventricular tachycardia by Lewis in 1909. The examples selected emphasize some of the diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of "broad QRS tachycardias" and their major differential features from abberrancy. Multiple simultaneous surface ECG leads are valuable in showing the direction of the initial activation forces of the QRS complexes, the frontal QRS axis and the configuration of the QRS in lead V1. Vagal maneuvers and intra-atrial or esophageal leads are very useful in demonstrating the underlying atrial rhythm and atrioventricular dissociation when present. In life-threatening situations, urgent therapy or D.C. cardioversion may be required before a definitive diagnosis has been established. In recent years electrode catheter techniques for the diagnosis, for arrhythmia induction and for the selection and assessment of the effectiveness of the antiarrhythmic drug therapy have been carried out in the management of recurrent broad QRS tachycardia. In view of the inherent risks with the use of this invasive technique, it should be restricted to a carefully selected number of patients with recurrent life-threatening dysrhythmias as suggested by Scheinman.     

Inappropriate tachycardia detection by a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator

This case describes "double counting" of intrinsic conduction due to the combination of intraventricular conduction delay and the merging of the electrograms from the right and left ventricle (coronary sinus) leads in a biventricular cardioverter defibrillator. This situation prompted asymptomatic antitachycardia pacing. Lengthening of AV conduction by betablocker solved the problem.     

The first year experience with the dual chamber ICD

In July 1997, a dual chamber pacemaker combined with a tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) first became available in the United States. We report the first-year experience of one center in the United States with this dual chamber ICD. Of a total of 174 ICDs, 95 (55%) were dual chamber devices and 79 (45%) were single chamber. New dual chamber ICD insertions averaged 57.4 +/- 8.9 minutes, though there was a learning curve as the last 30 implants averaged 45.1 +/- 6.1 minutes with a negative slope to the regression line of procedure duration (-0.52, P < 0.05). New single chamber ICD implants were 18.5 minutes quicker (38.9 +/- 7.2 minutes). The most challenging implants were dual chamber upgrades (mean procedure duration 64.9 +/- 15.8 minutes), especially if there was a previously implanted pacemaker and ICD at separate sites. Indications for a new dual chamber device were grouped into classic pacemaker indications (52.5%), which comprised the Class I ACC/AHA guidelines, ICD-specific indications (24.6%), and other (23.0%). In the 34 patients undergoing dual chamber upgrade, the classic and ICD-specific groups were equal (47.0% each). Complications were rare (2.8%), though 3 (8.8%) of 34 undergoing a dual chamber upgrade developed late infections requiring explantation. In its first year, the dual chamber ICD has become a common device at our institution comprising 55% of new implants. As experience grows, we anticipate similar usage at most institutions.     

Reinitiation of ventricular macroreentry within the His-Purkinje system by back-up ventricular pacing - a mechanism of ventricular tachycardia storm

BACKGROUND: We describe immediate reinitiation of macroreentry ventricular tachycardia (VT) involving the His-Purkinje system by ventricular pacing from the electrode of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as a mechanism of VT storm refractory to ICD therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Repetitive reinitiation of bundle branch reentry tachycardia (BBRT), interfascicular tachycardia, or both VTs by ventricular pacing was identified in four ICD patients presenting with VT storm or incessant VT. All patients had a pre-existing prolonged HV interval (75 +/- 9 ms) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) or bifascicular block during sinus rhythm. The VTs included BBRT with LBBB in three patients and interfascicular tachycardia with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left anterior or left posterior fascicular block in two patients. The paced beats from the ICD electrode exhibited a LBBB pattern of depolarization in two patients and a RBBB contour in V1 and V2 with left axis deviation in two patients. The QRS complex during pacing from the ICD electrode closely resembled that of the recurrent VT in all four patients suggesting that the pacing site of the ICD electrode was in proximity to the myocardial exit site of the bundle fascicle used for antegrade conduction during the reinitiated VT. Ventricular pacing from the ICD electrode after termination of the VT apparently encountered the retrograde refractoriness of this bundle fascicle and allowed immediate re-propagation of the wavefront orthodromically along the VT circuit. BBRT was eliminated by ablation of the right bundle branch. Successful ablation of the interfascicular tachycardias was achieved by targeting (1) an abnormal potential of the distal left posterior Purkinje network or (2) a diastolic potential during VT in the midinferior left ventricular (LV) septum. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive reinitiation of BBRT and interfascicular tachycardia by ventricular pacing from the ICD electrode should be considered as a mechanism of VT storm refractory to ICD therapy in patients with a pre-existing conduction delay within the His-Purkinje system.     

Termination of ventricular tachycardia by far-field stimulation in humans: a feasibility study

Background: Although a low‐energy cardioversion (LEC) shock from an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) can terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT), it frequently triggers ventricular fibrillation (VF) and is therefore not used in clinical practice. We tested whether a modified LEC shock with a very short duration (0.12–0.36 ms), termed “field stimulus,” can terminate VT without triggering VF. Methods: In 13 sedated patients with implanted ICDs, we attempted to induce VT and to terminate the arrhythmias by field stimuli during hospital predischarge tests. Results: In eight patients, 27 VT episodes were induced and treated with a total of 46 high‐voltage (25–200 V) field stimuli, which terminated 11 VT episodes (41% efficacy) and never accelerated VT into VF. VT episodes slower than 230 beats per minute (bpm) (median rate) were terminated more successfully than faster arrhythmia episodes (69% vs 15%, P < 0.01). The strength of the field stimulus had no major influence on the effectiveness. We therefore postulate that suboptimal timing of field stimuli (delivered simultaneously with a sensed event in the right ventricular apex) was the main reason for failed VT terminations. Conclusion: A short (0.12–0.36 ms), high‐voltage (50–100 V) field stimulus delivered from the shock coil of an implanted ICD system can safely terminate VT, especially for VT rates below 230 bpm. We believe that it would be reasonable to test the effectiveness of automatic field‐stimulus therapy from implanted ICDs in VT episodes up to 230 bpm that are not susceptible to termination by antitachycardia pacing. (PACE 2010; 33:1540–1547)     

Inactivation of a ventricular tachycardia preventive algorithm during automatic mode switching for atrial tachyarrhythmia

A patient with a dual chamber implantable defibrillator and pause dependent VT in whom a rate smoothing algorithm failed to operate during automatic mode switching due to device idiosyncrasy is reported. Preventive measures are discussed.     

宽QRS波心动过速鉴别诊断的临床分析

目的分析和对比宽QRS波心动过速(WCT)的鉴别诊断流程图的应用价值。方法对就诊于我院急诊科及心内科并经食管心房调搏、心内电生理检查或射频消融治疗而明确诊断的WCT患者,回顾性分析其病史、心电图、食管调搏或电生理检查及射频消融治疗的结果,研究Brugada四步法、无人区电轴联合aVR导联四步法对WCT诊断的准确率。结果82例WCT患者中,63例为室性心动过速,15例为室上性心动过速伴差异传导,3例为室上性心动过速伴预激前传,1例为双旁道间折返性心动过速。应用Brugada四步法正确诊断71例,正确诊断率86.6%;联合应用无人区电轴及aVR导联四步法,正确诊断75例患者,正确诊断率91.5%。结论联合应用无人区电轴及aVR导联四步法,可使大部分WCT得以正确诊断,提高WCT鉴别诊断的准确率。     

Implantation of an epicardial dual chamber ICD following unsuccessful percutaneous extraction of a failed ventricular shocking electrode

This report describes the case of a 22-year-old patient presenting with ICD electrode failure where attempted percutaneous electrode extraction was unsuccessful. In view of the patient's young age, an operative approach was considered most appropriate. The failed electrode was surgically extracted and a new epicardial pacing/defibrillator system inserted.     

Automatic discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia using a multilayer perceptron in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

The morphological analysis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) stored electrograms (EGM) using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) has been proposed for discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. However, a reliable estimation of the accuracy of MLP methods is lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the morphology and spectrum-based MLP with more conventional morphology-based algorithms in a large series of ICD-stored episodes of arrhythmia. One set of ICD-stored electrograms was used for control and training purposes and a second one, consisting of spontaneous episodes in patients with dual chamber ICDs, for validation of the MLP performance. The correlation waveform analysis (CWA) and the EGM width criterion were compared with MLP methods. Bootstrap resampling techniques were used to extract the relevant information in the MLP training. The morphology-based MLP achieved better discrimination than any other method, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (tolerance intervals): 0.96 (0.81, 0.96) for MLP, 0.91 (0.77, 0.94) for CWA, and 0.68 (0.49, 0.78) for EGM width in the validation set. A specificity of 73.0% was obtained at 95% sensitivity, compared with 38.1% and 55.1% using CWA and EGM width criteria, respectively. In contrast, the generalization capabilities of spectral-based MLP methods are poor, showing a lower area under the ROC curve in the validation set. Time-domain MLP techniques may be useful for the morphological analysis of the intracardiac EGM signal stored by ICD devices. When properly trained and validated, these methods perform better than other commonly used morphological criteria for discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.     

Seasonal variations of ventricular arrhythmia clusters in defibrillator recipients

BACKGROUND: Clustering ventricular arrhythmias are the consequence of acute ventricular electrical instability and represent a challenge in the management of the growing number of patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Triggering factors can rarely be identified. OBJECTIVES: Several studies have revealed seasonal variations in the frequency of cardiovascular events and life-threatening arrhythmias, and we sought to establish whether seasonal factors may exacerbate ventricular electrical instability leading to arrhythmia clusters and electrical storm. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive defibrillator recipients were followed-up during 3.3 +/- 2.2 years. Arrhythmia cluster was defined as the occurrence of three or more arrhythmic events triggering appropriate defibrillator therapies within 2 weeks. Time intervals between two clusters were calculated for each month and each season, and were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 698 patient years, 98 arrhythmia clusters were observed in 51 patients; clustering ventricular arrhythmias were associated with temporal variables; they occurred more frequently in the winter and spring months than during the summer and fall. Accordingly, the time intervals between two clusters were significantly shorter during winter and spring (median and 95% CI): winter 16 (5-19), spring 11.5 (7-25), summer 34.5 (15-55), fall 50.5 (19-65), P = 0.0041. CONCLUSION: There are important seasonal variations in the incidence of arrhythmia clusters in ICD recipients. Whether these variations are related to environmental factors, change in physical activity, or psychological factors requires further study.     

Long-term arrhythmia variability after monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Background: Arrhythmia burden in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) after monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (mVT) is higher than in patients with other indications. We investigated the long‐term arrhythmia profile in this subset of patients. Methods: Fifty‐two patients with an ICD implanted after mVT were followed up for at least 3 months. The cycle lengths (CLs) of the tachycardias recovered from the device memory were compared with the CL of the index arrhythmia. Morphological analysis of the intracardiac electrograms was performed and the response to antitachycardia pacing (ATP) was also assessed. Results: A total of 833 mVT episodes with intracardiac electrograms occurred during the follow‐up (3–58 months; mean: 30.3 months) in 41 of the 52 patients analyzed. mVTs with different CLs as compared with the index mVT were found in 26 (50.0%), and at least two different mVT morphologies were observed in 28 (53.8%) patients. Multiple mVT morphologies were predictive of lower ATP efficacy (95.6%, 85.0%, and 70.3% in the patients with 1, 2, and 3 or more mVT morphologies, respectively; P < 0.0001) and a higher shock burden (4.2%, 19.3%, and 24.7% in the patients with 1, 2, and 3 or more mVT morphologies, respectively; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: A high mVT burden was demonstrated with marked variability of the arrhythmias as concerns both CL and morphology in patients with an ICD implanted for mVT. Multiple mVT morphologies during the follow‐up were predictive of lower ATP efficacy and a higher shock burden. (PACE 2011; 34:1185–1191)     

Characteristics and relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in defibrillator recipients

INTRODUCTION: Studies of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) have been limited to "electrical storms," where recurrent arrhythmias necessitate repeated external cardioversions or defibrillations. Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may also suffer frequently recurrent arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal pattern and the clinical relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in ICD recipients. METHODS: The incidence and the type of arrhythmias were determined by reviewing stored electrograms. VT/VF clusters were defined as the occurrence of three or more adequate and successful ICD interventions within 2 weeks. Two hundred and fourteen consecutive ICD recipients were followed during an average of 3.3 +/- 2.2 years (698 patient-years). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (24%) suffered 98 VT/VF clusters 21 +/- 22 months after ICD implantation, 93% of these clusters consisting of recurrent regular VT. Monomorphic VT as index event leading to ICD implantation was the only factor predicting VT/VF clusters. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the combined end-point of death or heart transplantation showed a 5-year event-free survival of 67% versus 87% in patients with and without clusters, respectively (P = 0.026). Adjusted hazard ratios for death or heart transplantation in the group with arrhythmia clusters was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.9 P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: VT/VF clusters are frequent late after ICD implantation particularly in patients who had VT as index-event. As arrhythmias and recurrent ICD interventions are responsible for an important morbidity, there is a possible role for a prophylactic intervention. Furthermore, VT/VF clusters are an independent marker of increased risk of death or need for heart transplantation.     

Incidence and rate characteristics of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with a dual chamber defibrillator

Atrial tachyarrhythmias play an important role in the treatment of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias not only with respect to inappropriate discharges but also to left ventricular function and stroke risk. A combined dual chamber defibrillator provides separate therapies for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. To assess the incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with this dual chamber implantable defibrillator, 40 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and concomitant atrial tachyarrhythmias and/or AV conduction disturbances were included in a prospective study. During a mean follow-up of 25 +/- 11 months, 26 of 40 patients had a total of 1,430 recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias. The vast majority of the atrial tachyarrhythmias with regular atrial cycles had a mean median atrial cycle length of 235 +/- 37 ms and a mean duration of 34 +/- 144 minutes. Atrial tachyarrhythmias with irregular atrial cycles exhibited a median atrial cycle length of 198 +/- 31 ms and had a mean duration of 246 +/- 1,264 minutes. In addition, 67% of 375 tachyarrhythmias, in which the median ventricular cycle length during the ongoing episode could be documented, had a ventricular rate <100 beats/min. Continuous atrial arrhythmia detection with a dual chamber ICD reveals a high incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with a predominantly short duration of paroxysmal recurrences <1 hour in the vast majority of episodes.     

Termination of pacemaker endless loop tachycardia by an atrial extrasystole

This article documents the termination of a pacemaker endless loop tachycardia by a critically timed atrial extrasystole. Although predictable electrophysiologically, this mode of termination has not been previously reported. The observation is conceptually important because it provides the final link in establishing the similarity of endless loop tachycardia and spontaneous reentrant AV nodal or junctional tachycardias in terms of initiation and termination by single atrial or ventricular extrasystoles.