Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with pulmonary embolism and disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with low-molecular-weight heparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe adverse effect of heparin therapy. Although most cases occur in patients receiving unfractionated heparin, HIT can arise in venous thrombosis prophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). We report an uncommon case of HIT in a postoperative orthopedic patient associated with LMWH (nadroparin), complicated by deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation, treated successfully with recombinant hirudin and immunoglobulin therapy.     

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin: a prospective cohort study

Although heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a known complication of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), its incidence in medical patients treated with subcutaneous UFH is less well defined. To determine the incidence of HIT in this category of patients, the platelet count was performed at baseline and then every 3 +/- 1 days in 598 consecutive patients admitted to 2 medical wards and treated with subcutaneous UFH for prophylactic (n = 360) or therapeutic (n = 238) indications. The diagnosis of HIT was accepted in the case of a platelet drop of 50% or more and either the demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies or (when this search could not be performed) the combination of the following features: (1) the absence of any other obvious clinical explanation for thrombocytopenia, (2) the occurrence of thrombocytopenia at least 5 days after heparin start, and (3) either the normalization of the platelet count within 10 days after heparin discontinuation or the earlier patient's death due to an unexpected thromboembolic complication. HIT developed in 5 patients (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.6%); all of them belonged to the subgroup of patients who received heparin for prophylactic indications. The prevalence of thromboembolic complications in patients with HIT (60%) was remarkably higher than that observed in the remaining 593 patients (3.5%), leading to an odds ratio of 40.8 (95% CI, 5.2-162.8). Although the frequency of HIT in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous heparin is lower than that observed in other clinical settings, this complication is associated with a similarly high rate of thromboembolic events.     

A case of heparin induced thrombocytopenia treated with lepirudin infusion: case report

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication that can be seen in the course of heparin treatment. The syndrome is much likely to be seen during treatment with standard heparin but it can also be seen due to low molecular weight heparins. In this article, we presented a case of HIT who was given low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis that developed massive pulmonary thromboembolism. The patient was successfully treated with lepirudin infusion and no complications due to treatment was seen.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a frequent complication after cardiac surgery

Thrombocytopenia is a common problem in cardiovascular patients, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is therefore frequently suspected. Unfractionated heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass is particularly immunogenic as 25% to 50% post-cardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1 to 3% will develop HIT. These antibodies recognize a 'self protein', platelet factor 4 (PF4), bound to heparin. Antibodies associated with a high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1 which strongly activate platelets and coagulation, thereby causing thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. A biphasic evolution of platelet count with a secondary decrease after a previous increase following CPB or non-recovery of thrombocytopenia within 6 days post-operatively always requires screening for HIT antibodies. Both functional (platelet activation tests) and immunologic assays (antigen assays) are necessary in every patient to establish the diagnosis of HIT. When the clinical probability of HIT is high, the first requirement is to discontinue heparin, without waiting for results of laboratory investigations. An alternative anticoagulant such as danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) or lepirudin (Refludan) must then be administered since heparin withdrawal alone is insufficient to control the prothrombotic state associated with HIT. The risk of HIT will probably soon decrease due to the wider use of fondaparinux, which does not interact in vitro with PF4, but it could remain significant in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in relation to initial use or reexposure to heparin

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with a decrease of platelet counts that usually begins after at least 5 days of heparin treatment. Uncertainty exists about the risk of early onset of HIT (ie, < 5 days) in relation to previous heparin exposure. We therefore analyzed the temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in patients with laboratory-confirmed HIT to assess whether patients with previous heparin exposure have an increased risk of early onset of HIT. DESIGN: Platelet count patterns in patients with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of HIT were examined in a retrospective chart review of a clinical study database. The onset of thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L associated with the current heparin treatment (mainly unfractionated heparin) was analyzed using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients with 125 treatment episodes were assessed: HIT developed in 79 patients during initial exposure to heparin, and in 46 patients during reexposure. Early onset (< 5 days) of thrombocytopenia was associated with very recent heparin exposure. Patients reexposed to heparin within 3 months had an earlier onset of thrombocytopenia as compared to patients reexposed to heparin after 3 months (4.9 +/- 4.4 days vs 11.5 +/- 5.5 days [mean +/- SD], p = 0.001). There was no difference between onset on thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L in patients reexposed to heparin within 3 to 12 months and after 1 year (9.7 +/- 6.4 days vs 12.3 +/- 5.2 days, p = 0.41). Whether platelet counts were obtained daily or less regularly did not affect the analysis. CONCLUSION: Early onset of thrombocytopenia in HIT is associated with recent heparin treatment (< 3 months). In contrast, for patients who did not receive heparin within the previous 3 months, HIT is an unlikely explanation for thrombocytopenia that occurs within the first 5 days.     

Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome without any proximate heparin exposure,infection, or inflammatory condition: Atypical clinical features with heparin-dependent platelet activating antibodies

Recent studies suggest that a thromboembolic disorder resembling heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), so-called spontaneous HIT syndrome, can occur in patients without any history of heparin exposure. It is likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion antibodies induced by other polyanions, such as bacterial surfaces and nucleic acids. We describe an atypical case of spontaneous HIT syndrome. A 70-year-old man suddenly presented with acute cerebral sinus thrombosis (CST). Soon after the initiation of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of CST, his platelet count fell precipitously and he developed deep vein thrombosis, a clinical picture consistent with rapid-onset HIT but without any proximate episodes of heparin exposure, infection, trauma, surgery, or other acute illness. Antigen assays and a washed platelet activation assay indicated that the patient already possessed anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies with heparin-dependent platelet activation properties on admission. Cessation of UFH and initiation of argatroban resulted in prompt recovery of his platelet count without further thromboembolic events. We identified two similar cases in the literature. However, these patients do not meet the recently proposed criteria for spontaneous HIT syndrome. Even in atypical cases, however, inappropriate or delayed diagnosis of HIT appears to be associated with worse outcomes. We propose that these atypical cases should be included in the category of spontaneous HIT syndrome.     

ET gets HIT--thrombocytotic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a patient with essential thrombocythemia (ET).

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively common complication in patients receiving heparin, and represents a strong risk factor for thromboembolic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. The condition is commonly defined as a platelet count fall of greater than 30-50% to values below 150 x 10(9)/l. Despite this, several cases with platelet count nadirs in the normal range have been reported. This report describes a patient with status post-carotid thrombendarterectomy presenting with neurological symptoms and thrombocytosis (1235 x 10(9)/l), which in due course was diagnosed to be caused by essential thrombocythemia (ET). Heparin therapy was established and symptoms resolved markedly. After 5 days of standard heparin therapy, serologically confirmed HIT with new neurological symptoms occurred. The platelet count nadir attributed to HIT was far above normal (633 x 10(9)/l), which nevertheless represented a substantial relative platelet count fall (49%). This is the first reported case of serologically confirmed HIT in a patient with ET. Furthermore, it represents the first published case of HIT being present in thrombocytosis. Clinicians should be aware that atypical HIT can even be present in thrombocytosis and, because of nomenclature, HIT with normal and elevated platelet count nadirs is likely to be largely underdiagnosed.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: analysis of risk factors in medical inpatients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an unpredictable reaction to heparin characterized by thrombocytopenia and increased risk of life-threatening venous and/or arterial thrombosis. Data are lacking regarding additional risk factors that may be associated with the development of HIT. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that may be associated with HIT in medical inpatients receiving heparin. Twenty five thousand six hundred and fifty-three patients admitted to the medicine service who received heparin product were reviewed retrospectively. The diagnosis of HIT was confirmed if the platelet count dropped >50% from baseline and there was a positive laboratory HIT assay. Fifty-five cases of in-hospital HIT were observed. Multivariate analysis identified the administration of full anticoagulation dose with unfractionated heparin or exposure to heparin products for more than 5 d with an increased risk of HIT. Moreover, patients who were on haemodialysis, carried a diagnosis of autoimmune disease, gout or heart failure were also at increased risk. The results suggest that when using heparin products in these patient cohorts, increased surveillance for HIT is necessary.     

High prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis among patients with essential thrombocytemia carrying V617F mutation

Arterial and venous complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). MPNs patients, frequently receive heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication resulting in a severe acquired thrombophilic condition. We carried out a retrospective analysis to evaluate occurrence of new thrombotic events during heparin therapy in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. We studied 108 ET patients on heparin for treatment of previous thrombotic events or in thromboprophilaxis. Fifty-eight of them carried JAK 2 V617F mutation while 50 patients were without V617F mutation. Ten patients, among those with JAK 2 V617F mutation after a median of 10 days from heparin treatment presented a platelet drop, new thrombotic events and in 10/10 cases heparin-related antibodies were found. In the other group, two patients (4%) presented a platelet drop, thrombotic manifestations and heparin related antibodies. Our data show that HIT is more frequent, during heparin treatment, in patients with ET carrying V617F mutation, as compared with patients without mutations (P?=?0.029). ET with V617F mutation seems to be associated with higher risk of thrombotic complications during heparin treatment. Monitoring platelet counts very closely during the course of heparin is essential especially in ET patients in which platelet drop may be hidden by constitutional thrombocytosis.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a uremic patient requiring hemodialysis: an alternative treatment and reexposure to heparin.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but potentially serious complication of hemodialysis, and subsequent reexposure to heparin after the disappearance of antiheparin-PF4 complex antibodies (HIT antibody) has been controversial. We report a 60-year-old woman who was sensitized to unfractionated heparin (heparin) as anticoagulant during hemodialysis (HD) and heparin flush on a nonsession day. The patient suddenly developed acute systemic reactions with acute pulmonary embolism a few minutes after manipulation with heparin flush on day 9, a nonsession day. Although there was no evidence of pulmonary embolism on a pulmonary scintigram on the next day, the fifth HD session was discontinued owing to recurrence of acute systemic reactions and massive clots in the dialyzer 30 min into the session. After confirmation of the presence of HIT antibody and maturation of vascular access fistula, a sixth HD session was carried out with argatroban, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, with a bolus of 10 mg and continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/hr as an alternative to heparin. Optimal dose adjustment of argatroban through activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) monitoring led to a bolus of 5 mg and continuous infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/hr. The patient's HD treatment at the same doses 3 times a week followed an uneventful course over 6 months. HIT antibody was seronegative about 40 days after the cessation of heparin treatment. Reexposure to heparin was attempted with the monitoring of HIT antibody and platelet counts before and after the sessions on day 210. The titers of HIT antibody compared with before the level of reexposure showed a transient insignificantly small peak, and dialysis with heparin has been maintained to date with no recurrence of HIT. The measurement of HIT antibody titer could be useful in assessing not only the effect of argatroban to replace heparin but also in predicting the recurrence of HIT due to reexposure.     

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia resulting from preceding exposure to heparin catheter flushes

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse effect of heparin. It can result from any type of heparin exposure and by any route of administration; however only a few cases are reported after exposures to small quantities of heparin from catheter flushes. The major clinical problem associated with HIT is thrombosis. Early detection and institution of alternative, non-heparin anticoagulation are important. We report a patient with HIT associated with use of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin in whom immune sensitization to heparin was triggered by two 500-unit exposure to UFH associated with intravascular catheter flushing for antineoplastic chemotherapy in a patient with colon adenocarcinoma.     

La thrombopénie induite par héparine : mise au point

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin therapy. It is due to the synthesis of antibodies most often directed against platelet factor 4 (FP4) modified by heparin (H). HIT is manifested by a platelet count fall, associated with a high risk of venous or arterial thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is based on the assessment of clinical probability (4Ts score or change in platelet count after cardiac surgery) and the demonstration of heparin-modified anti-FP4 antibodies (FP4/H). If the immunological tests are positive, functional tests should be performed. In case of suspicion of HIT, it is necessary to urgently stop heparin therapy, to perform a doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs, and to prescribe an alternative anticoagulation agent at a curative dose. Currently, danaparoid sodium and argatroban are authorized. The diagnosis and management of HIT remain complex and requires multidisciplinary collaboration.     

Acute adrenal insufficiency associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Although the thrombotic risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) is well recognized and may affect any vascular bed, the involvement of adrenal veins has been less commonly described. We report the case of a 86-year-old woman who developed bilateral massive adrenal haematoma associated with HIT, resulting in acute adrenal insufficiency. After immediate discontinuation of heparin and starting therapy with danaparoid and hydrocortisone, the clinical evolution was favourable, although adrenal failure was irreversible. When abdominal pain, hypotension and fever occur during heparin therapy, associated with a drop in platelet count, acute adrenal insufficiency secondary to HIT should be considered, as early diagnosis is essential for the treatment of this life-threatening complication.     

HITlights: a career perspective on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Two decades of research into heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) permit a personal historical perspective on this fascinating syndrome. Previously, the frequency of HIT was unknown, although complicating thrombosis was believed to be rare and primarily arterial. The opportunity to apply a remarkable test for "HIT antibodies"--the (14) C-serotonin-release assay (SRA)--to serial plasma samples obtained during a clinical trial of heparin thromboprophylaxis, provided insights into the peculiar nature of HIT, such as, its prothrombotic nature--including its strong association with venous thrombosis (RR = 11.6 [95%CI, 6.4-20.8; P < 0.0001); its more frequent occurrence with unfractionated versus low-molecular-weight heparin; the "iceberg" model, which states that among the many patients who form anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during heparin therapy, only a minority whose antibodies evince strong platelet-activating properties develop HIT; and the characteristic HIT timeline, whereby serum/plasma antibodies are readily detectable at or prior to the HIT-associated platelet count fall. Applying the SRA also to patients encountered in clinical practice led to recognition of warfarin-induced venous limb gangrene (for which HIT is a major risk factor via its extreme hypercoagulability) and delayed-onset HIT (whereby thrombocytopenia begins or worsens following heparin discontinuation, due to the ability of HIT antibodies strongly to activate platelets even in the absence of heparin--so-called heparin-"independent" platelet activation). Recent concepts include the increasing recognition of HIT "overdiagnosis" (due to the low diagnostic specificity of the widely-applied PF4-dependent immunoassays), and the observation that HIT-associated consumptive coagulopathy is a risk factor for treatment failure with PTT-adjusted direct thrombin inhibitor therapy ("PTT confounding" secondary to HIT-associated coagulopathy).     

Decreased prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin and related drugs

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) Type II represents a disease spectrum associated with a high risk of thrombosis leading to limb loss and death. The pathophysiology of HIT is based on the development of antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is heterogeneous in molecular chain length and degree of sulfation accounting in part, for, the heterogeneity of HIT antibodies. Because of its smaller size, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) does not interact with PF4 and platelets as efficiently as does UFH. This translates into a lower risk of immune sensitization with LMWH than with UFH treatment. LMWH is less likely than UFH to cause antibody generation and thus patients do not develop clinical HIT at the same frequency with LMWH as with UFH treatment. The antibodies generated by LMWH treatment are more often immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgM as opposed to IgG antibodies, which are associated with symptomatic clinical HIT generated by exposure to UFH. However, platelet activation/aggregation can occur from LMWHs in the presence of most pre-existing HIT antibodies that had been generated from UFH exposure, although the response is less than that caused by UFH plus HIT antibody. With the expanded use of LMWH, the frequency of clinical HIT may naturally decline, given that LMWHs are less likely to generate HIT antibody.     

Immunoglobulin G from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia binds to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an important complication of heparin therapy. Although there is general agreement that platelet activation in vitro by the HIT IgG is mediated by the platelet Fc receptor, the interaction among the antibody, heparin, and platelet membrane components is uncertain and debated. In this report, we describe studies designed to address these interactions. We found, as others have noted, that a variety of other sulfated polysaccharides could substitute for heparin in the reaction. Using polysaccharides selected for both size and charge, we found that reactivity depended on two independent factors: a certain minimum degree of sulfation per saccharide unit and a certain minimum size. Hence, highly sulfated but small (< 1,000 daltons) polysaccharides were not reactive nor were large but poorly sulfated polysaccharides. The ability of HIT IgG to recognize heparin by itself was tested by Ouchterlony gel diffusion, ammonium sulfate and polyethylene glycol precipitation, and equilibrium dialysis. No technique demonstrated reactivity. However, when platelet releasate was added to heparin and HIT IgG, a 50-fold increase in binding of radio-labeled heparin to HIT IgG was observed. The releasate was then depleted of proteins capable of binding to heparin by immunoaffinity chromatography. Only platelet factor 4-immunodepleted releasate lost its reactivity with HIT IgG and heparin. Finally, to determine whether the reaction occurred on the surface of platelets or in the fluid phase, washed platelets were incubated with HIT IgG or heparin and after a wash step, heparin or HIT IgG was added, respectively. Reactivity was only noted when platelets were preincubated with heparin. Consistent with these observations was the demonstration of the presence of PF4 on platelets using flow cytometry. These studies indicate that heparin and other large, highly sulfated polysaccharides bind to PF4 to form a reactive antigen on the platelet surface. HIT IgG then binds to this complex with activation of platelets through the platelet Fc receptors.     

Glucosamine sulfate does not crossreact with the antibodies of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the crossreactivity of glucosamine sulfate, used for treatment of degenerative joint disease with antibodies induced in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). BACKGROUND: HIT is a severe adverse effect of heparin therapy induced by an immunological mechanism. The antibodies in HIT are induced by a complex of heparin and, in most cases, platelet factor 4. Hereby generation of the antigen is not strictly dependent on heparin. Heparin can be substituted by a variety of polysulfated carbohydrates. In vitro and in vivo crossreactivity of HIT antibodies has been demonstrated for a chemically polysulfated chondroitin-like substance (Arteparon, Luitpoldwerke, Munich, Germany), formerly used for chondroprotection. Another drug widely used in the treatment of degenerative joint disease is glucosamine sulfate. Glucosamine is a building block of glycosaminoglycans, of which heparin is the clinically most important. Many patients with degenerative joint disease use glucosamine sulfate. This group is also at the highest risk to develop HIT following joint replacement surgery. METHODS: We examined the interactions of glucosamine sulfate (DONA 200-S, Opfermann, Wiehl, Germany) with platelets and antibodies of patients with HIT in and without the presence of heparin. Sera of 5 HIT patients and platelets of 4 healthy donors were used. The binding of HIT antibodies to PF4/glucosamine sulfate complexes was assessed by an ELISA. RESULTS: HIT antibodies did not activate platelets in the presence of glucosamine sulfate in a serotonin-release assay. Preincubation with glucosamine sulfate did not inhibit platelet activation by HIT antibodies in the presence of heparin (0.2 IU/ml). Antibodies bonded to PF4/heparin but not to PF4/glucosamine sulfate complexes. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to sulfated glycosaminoglycans, there is no evidence for an immunological crossreactivity of HIT antibodies between heparin and glucosamine sulfate.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recent experience in a large teaching hospital

Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious adverse reaction caused by platelet‐activating antibodies. Aim: To describe experience with HIT. Methods: Twenty‐two patients identified by laboratory records of heparin‐associated antibodies with a 50% or greater decrease in platelet count were reviewed in our 600‐bed metropolitan teaching hospital from 1999 to April 2005. Results: There was an increase in the frequency of HIT diagnosed during the review period, which was associated with a rise in the number of requests for HIT antibodies. Thrombotic complications were identified in 14 of 22 patients with HIT. Mean age was 65 years, and 11 patients were men. Seven patients died and HIT was considered contributory in four. One patient required mid‐forearm amputation. Unfractionated heparin was used in all cases and five patients also received enoxaparin. Mean time to HIT screen, reflecting when the diagnosis was first suspected, was 14 days. Platelet nadir ranged from 6 × 10⁹/L to 88 × 10⁹/L, with a percentage drop in platelet count of 67–96%. Alternative anticoagulation (danaparoid) was not used in three patients, two of whom died. Conclusions: HIT is a potentially life‐threatening complication of heparin therapy, associated with a fall in platelet count and a high incidence of thromboembolic complications. It is most frequently seen using unfractionated heparin therapy. The increase in frequency of HIT diagnosed in our hospital appears to be associated with a greater awareness of the entity, although detection is often delayed. Platelet count should be monitored in patients on heparin and the presence of antiplatelet antibodies determined if HIT is suspected. Treatment involves both discontinuation of heparin and the use of an alternative anticoagulant such as danaparoid because of the persisting risk of thrombosis.     

Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis: A Registry of Prolonged Heparin Use and Thrombocytopenia among Hospitalized Patients with and without Cardiovascular Disease

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is estimated to occur in 1–5% of all patients receiving heparin, and 25–50% of such cases develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) A conservative estimate based only on cardiovascular patients suggests that in the United States approximately 100,000 patients develop thrombocytopenia, and 25–50,000 develop HITT annually. Both HIT and HITT are associated with high morbidity and mortality and represent substantial worldwide public health concerns.Registry Design: The objective of the Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry is to identify the incidence of HIT and/or HITT in patients treated with systemic heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) in contemporary practice. Additional objectives include to: (1) provide a comprehensive database of patients with suspected HIT or HITT, (2) monitor and define clinical events, including thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, and mortality among patients treated with prolonged (> 96 hours) heparin, (3) describe the incidence and outcomes of HIT and HITT in patients who are treated with heparin and who develop thrombocytopenia in the Coronary Care Unit setting, and (4) document and characterize current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of suspected HIT. The unblinded registry will record approximately 5,000 patients at 60–80 US hospitals with either prolonged systemic heparin administration or thrombocytopenia and those with suspected HIT or HITT. Enrollment began in the first quarter 2003 and was completed at the end of 2004.Implications: The registry will provide valuable insights to the incidence and consequences of HIT and HITT that will enable improvements in diagnosis and treatment.The CATCH Registry is supported by a grant from Berlex Laboratories, Inc.     

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Acknowledging Its Presence in Low-Molecular Weight Heparin Therapy

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a lower incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) than is unfractionated heparin. We describe a 75-year-old woman who developed HIT with thrombotic manifestations following the use of nadroparin calcium. Subsequent anticoagulation was achieved with warfarin. This case serves to highlight an important complication that cannot be ignored despite its low incidence. The majority of HIT cases are likely to occur in LMWH-treated patients because LMWH replaces unfractionated heparin for most indications. The lack of suitable alternative anticoagulant treatments for patients with HIT in Singapore is also emphasized.