双气囊内镜和胶囊内镜诊断小肠出血的临床评价

目的评价双气囊内镜和胶囊内镜对小肠出血的临床诊断价值。方法比较双气囊内镜、胶囊内镜及全消化道造影对小肠出血病灶的总体检出率;通过自身对照,比较双气囊内镜和胶囊内镜对小肠出血诊断率;分析胶囊内镜对1次双气囊内镜检查明确诊断率的影响。结果105例小肠出血患者中,双气囊内镜检出克罗恩病24例,腺癌15例,慢性非特异性炎症12例,不明原因小肠溃疡10例,小肠间质肿瘤8例,小肠息肉8例,小肠血管畸形出血6例,钩虫病5例,麦克尔憩室及多发憩室5例,小肠淋巴瘤3例,无明显异常9例,阳性率91．4％（96／105）。其中40例进行胶囊内镜检查,病变检出率75．0％（30／40）;75例患者全消化道造影检查,病变检出率33．3％（25／75）。根据胶囊内镜结果1次双气囊内镜检查明确诊断率90．0％（36／40）,而根据临床特征及消化道造影结果1次双气囊内镜检查明确诊断率69．2％（45／65）。结论小肠疾病的主要病因是小肠良性溃疡（包括克罗恩病）、肿瘤、慢性炎症,其次是息肉、血管畸形、寄生虫感染、麦克尔憩室及淋巴瘤等。双气囊内镜对小肠出血诊断率高于胶囊内镜,胶囊内镜能提高1次双气囊内镜明确诊断率。     

单气囊内镜的临床应用价值初步探讨

目的初步评价单气囊内镜在小肠疾病诊治中的应用价值。方法回顾分析2009年2月-8月使用Olympus单气囊内镜检查23例临床怀疑小肠疾病患者的临床资料。接受检查患者包括消化道隐源性出血9例,腹痛7例,胶囊内镜检查发现可疑肿物4例,高度怀疑克罗恩病3例。结果23名患者共进行了34次单气囊内镜检查。内镜准备平均时间少于5min。经口途径的平均检查时间为（61±25）min,经肛途径的平均检查时间为（67±28）min。6名患者完成了全小肠检查。小肠病变的检出率为60．9％。无穿孔等严重并发症发生。结论单气囊内镜的准备及操作过程简单,而且能够安全的检查小肠。单气囊内镜可用于可疑小肠疾病的诊治。     

胶囊内镜与双气囊内镜诊断小肠疾病的比较

目的比较胶囊内镜和双气囊内镜对小肠疾病的检出率和诊断准确性，探讨其联合应用的临床意义。方法对116例不明原因消化道出血和102例不明原因腹痛或腹泻患者，共218例进行内镜检查。其中165例首选胶囊内镜，53例首选双气囊内镜。对胶囊内镜检查阴性或可疑病变者建议双气囊内镜检查，反之亦然。比较两种检查方法对小肠疾病的检出率、诊断率以及患者依从性、不良反应发生率等。结果1例胶囊内镜和2例双气囊内镜操作失败。51例患者行64次双气囊内镜检查，其中34例经口、4例经肛检查，13例分别接受经口和经肛检查。胶囊内镜对小肠病变的总检出率及对不明原因消化道出血的小肠疾病检出率（72．0％和88．0％），均明显高于双气囊内镜（41．2％和60．0％），诊断率也高于后者（51．8％和39．2％）。5例胶囊内镜检查阴性再经双气囊内镜检查者中，1例发现病灶；15例胶囊内镜检查怀疑小肠病变者中，12例经双气囊内镜结合活检病理确诊。而3例双气囊内镜未发现异常者再经胶囊内镜检查发现小肠病变。所有患者均未发生严重不良反应。结论胶囊内镜对小肠疾病检出率高，可作为怀疑小肠疾病，尤其是不明原因消化道出血的首选检查方法；双气囊内镜在胶囊内镜检查阴性者中仍可发现部分病灶，并能明确多数胶囊内镜下可疑病变，可作为胶囊内镜检查后的补充检测手段。     

胶囊内镜在消化道疾病诊断中的应用

目的了解胶囊内镜在消化道疾病，特别是对小肠疾病中的临床诊断应用价值。方法2004年2月至2006年2月间，应用GIVEN公司产M2A胶囊内镜检查74例，其中53例患者（分为不明原因消化道出血30例，反复发作腹痛、腹泻患者23例）经过胃镜和结肠镜检查，41例未发现可解释疾病的阳性结果，12例有胃黏膜的慢性炎症、息肉或结肠息肉；21例为健康体检者。结果0例不明原因出血的患者中，小肠病变诊断的阳性率为76．7％（23／30），其中小肠克罗恩病5例，小肠血管畸型6例，小肠黏膜糜烂11例和小肠息肉样隆起5例，其中3例经过手术证实为小肠肿瘤，1例为罕见的Cronkhite-Canada综合征，另有小肠憩室1例；持续腹痛、腹泻组的23例患者中，小肠病变诊断的阳性率为65．2％（15／23），其中小肠黏膜糜烂8例、回肠末端多发小溃疡7例，小肠多发息肉5例；21例健康查体者中有1例可见小肠多发细小的息肉样隆起，2例为小肠黏膜的炎症，8例为胃黏膜炎症，其余10例未见任何异常。疑诊小肠疾病的53例患者小肠病变的诊断阳性率为71．7％（38／53），胶囊内镜对出血组患者小肠黏膜病变诊断阳性率高于腹痛组，但差异无统计学意义；出血组患者胶囊在胃排空时间、小肠通过时间和排出体外时间均明显少于查体组。结论胶囊内镜对小肠疾病的诊断阳性率高，而且安全无痛苦，具有较好的临床应用价值，尤其适用于不明原因的消化道出血患者。     

OMOM胶囊内镜检查在消化道疾病中的应用价值

目的探讨OMOM胶囊内镜在消化道疾病中的应用价值。方法对79例临床表现为不明原因消化道系统症状患者行OMOM胶囊内镜检查。结果完成小肠检查75例,检出病变46例（检出率58．2％）,其中肠道血管畸形15例,小肠黏膜糜烂、黏膜下占位性病变各4例,小肠憩室、结核、过敏性紫癜、钩虫症、蛔虫症各1例,小肠多发息肉5例;食管炎1例,胃内黏膜糜烂8例,十二指肠炎症2例,十二指肠溃疡及结肠溃疡各1例;阴性33例。患者均无不适感。结论胶囊内镜对小肠疾病（尤其是不明原因消化道出血）具有较高诊断价值,对胃和结肠疾病也有一定诊断价值。     

胶囊内镜在老年患者小肠疾病诊断中的应用

目的探讨胶囊内镜在老年患者小肠疾病诊断中的应用及安全性。方法回顾性分析2007年7月至2012年6月在南京医科大学第一附属医院消化科行胶囊内镜检查的119例老年患者的临床资料,并与同期接受检查的206例中青年患者进行比较。结果接受胶囊内镜检查的老年患者的主要临床表现为不明原因消化道出血(55.5%)。老年患者与中青年患者相比,小肠转运时间、胶囊记录时间及全小肠检查完成率无明显差异(P>0.05);老年患者病变检出率为66.4%,中青年患者病变检出率为57.8%,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。老年患者检出的小肠疾病以血管病变为主(53.2%),中青年患者则以小肠溃疡为主(28.6%),并进一步确诊为克罗恩病。老年患者胶囊滞留率2.5%(3/119),中青年患者为6.3%(13/206),无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论胶囊内镜对老年患者小肠疾病的诊断同样具有重要价值且安全、有效。     

胶囊内镜在小肠疾病诊断中的作用

目的:小肠疾病很难诊断,现有的诊断技术又不尽如人意,而胶囊内镜能发现整个小肠内的微小病变。为此,我们对胶囊内镜在小肠疾病诊断中的价值进行评估。方法:自2002年5月至2003年9月,我们对经结肠镜、胃镜、X线钡餐造影、小肠钡灌造影、血管造影或核素扫描等检查未发现异常的79例疑患小肠疾病、尤其是不明原因消化道出血的患者,进行胶囊内镜检查,其中不明原因的消化道出血患者56例。结果:75例完成最终研究。75例患者中经胶囊内镜检查共发现异常63例,检出率为84％;其中能明确解释临床病因者50例,诊断率为66.6％,包括消化道血管病变21例、小肠炎症性肠病16例、小肠息肉5例、小肠恶性间质肿瘤2例、小肠类癌1例(该患者同时伴升结肠脂肪瘤)、淋巴瘤1例、粘膜下肿瘤3例及憩室1例。所获取的图像质量良好。结论:胶囊内镜对小肠疾病尤其是不明原因消化道出血具有良好的诊断价值。     

胶囊内镜在小肠疾病诊断中的作用

目的：小肠疾病很难诊断，现有的诊断技术又不尽如人意，而胶囊内镜能发现整个小肠内的微小病变。为此，我们对胶囊内镜在小肠疾病诊断中的价值进行评估。方法：自2002年5月至2003年9月，我们对经结肠镜、胃镜、X线钡餐造影、小肠钡灌造影、血管造影或核素扫描等检查未发现异常的79例疑患小肠疾病、尤其是不明原因消化道出血的患，进行胶囊内镜检查，其中不明原因的消化道出血患56例。结果：75例完成最终研究。75例患中经胶囊内镜检查共发现异常63例，检出率为84％；其中能明确解释临床病因50例，诊断率为66．6％，包括消化道血管病变21例、小肠炎症性肠病16例、小肠息肉5例、小肠恶性间质肿瘤2例、小肠类癌1例(该患同时伴升结肠脂肪瘤)、淋巴瘤1例、粘膜下肿瘤3例及憩室1例。所获取的图像质量良好。结论：胶囊内镜对小肠疾病尤其是不明原因消化道出血具有良好的诊断价值。     

112例胶囊内镜检查的临床运用

目的探讨胶囊内镜对消化道疾病的诊断价值,观察胶囊内镜检查的临床应用价值和安全性。方法采用国产OMOM胶囊内镜对112例受检者行消化道检查,分析其临床效果。结果 112例受检者中发现病变96例有病变,检出率85.7%。上消化道疾病37例,小肠疾病54例,结肠疾病5例,其中小肠非特异性炎症28例,多发性和单发性息肉3例,克罗恩病4例,血管发育不良6例,伴出血3例,小肠肿瘤2例,回肠末端淋巴滤泡增殖症10例。受检者顺应性好,未发生梗阻及崁顿并发症。结论胶囊内镜对小肠疾病有较高的检出率,安全性高、顺应性好,可以作为小肠疾病诊断的首选,而且对胃及大肠疾病也有一定的诊断价值。     

胶囊内镜检查胃肠疾病116例的临床分析

目的评价胶囊内镜对不同消化道症状并疑似小肠疾病患者的应用价值。方法对我院2010年8月至2012年6月期间进行胶囊内镜检查的116例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 116例患者完成胶囊内镜检查116例,共行116次检查,阳性检出率53.5%(62/116)。共发现小肠病变49例,小肠病变阳性率为42.2%(49/116),其中82例腹痛患者发现小肠病变33例(40.2%),12例腹泻患者发现小肠病变4例(33.3%),17例消化道出血患者发现小肠病变12例(70.6%)。其中炎性病变、隆起性病变最为常见。9例患者胶囊内镜胃内通过迟缓,1例患者胶囊内镜完全停滞于胃内,未至小肠,直至电池耗竭;3例胶囊内镜通过小肠迟缓;胶囊内镜在小肠内运行平均时间为369min。检查过程中患者无任何不适。结论胶囊内镜对不同消化道症状并疑似小肠疾病的就诊患者均有较好的诊断价值,简单、安全,并发症及风险小,依从性好。检查前充分肠道准备可提高检查质量。     

Capsule endoscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel diseases: Competing or complementary?

AIM To evaluate diagnostic yields of capsule endoscopy(CE) and/or single-balloon enteroscopy(SBE) in patients with suspected small bowel diseases.METHODS Were trospectively analyzed 700 patients with suspected small bowel diseases from September 2010 to March 2016. CE, SBE, or SBE with prior CE was performed in 401, 353, and 47 patients, respectively. Data from clinical and endoscopy records were collected for analysis. Indications, procedure times, diagnostic yields, and complications were summarized and evaluated.RESULTS The overall diagnostic yield for the CE group was 57.6%. The diagnostic yield of CE in patients with obscure gastroin testinal bleeding(OGIB) was significantly greater than that in patients with no bleeding(70.5% vs 43.8%, P 0.01). The overall diagnostic yield of SBE was 69.7%. There was no difference in the diagnostic yield of SBE between patients with OGIB and those with no bleeding(72.5% vs 68.9%, P = 0.534). Forty-seven patients underwent CE prior to SBE. Among them, the diagnostic yield of SBE with positive findings on prior CE was 93.3%. In addition, SBE detected two cases with superficial ulcer and erosive lesions in the small bowel, which were missed by CE. However, one case with lymphoma and two with Crohn's disease were not confirmed by SBE. The rate of capsule retention was 2.0%. There were no significant complications during or after SBE examinations.CONCLUSION SBE is a safe and effective technique for diagnosing small bowel diseases. SBE with prior CE seemed to improve the diagnostic yield of small bowel diseases.     

胶囊内镜结合双气囊内镜检查在小肠疾病诊断中的作用

目的 探讨胶囊内镜结合双气囊内镜检查在小肠疾病诊断中的作用.方法 连续调查299例因不明原因消化道出血或腹痛、腹泻等原因而行胶囊内镜检查者,对胶囊内镜阴性或诊断不确定者建议双气囊内镜检查.分析胶囊内镜后双气囊内镜检查者诊断和随访资料.结果 296例完成胶囊内镜检查,发现阳性138例(46.6%),可疑阳性68例(23.0%),阴性90例(30.4%).45例胶囊内镜可疑阳性者和7例阴性者接受双气囊内镜检查,分别检出31例和1例小肠病变.双气囊内镜可能存在假阴性结果8例,未发现假阳性者;胶囊内镜可能存在假阴性结果2例,并有8例假阳性.在胶囊内镜结果提示下,90.3%(28/31)患者经单侧双气囊内镜检查即发现病灶.平均随访期为17个月,93.5%的双气囊内镜明确诊断者得到有效治疗.二种检查方法耐受性好,无严重不良反应发生.结论 胶囊内镜对小肠病变检出率高,但其诊断不确定性也较高.双气囊内镜能明确大部分胶囊内镜可疑阳性者.胶囊内镜结合双气囊内镜检查的诊断策略能提高小肠疾病诊断率、指导治疗并改善患者预后.     

Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy (CE) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in small bowel Crohn's disease is not well established. We prospectively investigated CE, MRI, and double contrast fluoroscopy in patients with suspected small bowel Crohn's disease. METHODS: Fifty two consecutive patients (39 females, 13 males) were investigated by MRI, fluoroscopy and--if bowel obstruction could be excluded--by CE. In 25, Crohn's disease was newly suspected while the diagnosis of Crohn's disease (non-small bowel) had been previously established in 27. RESULTS: Small bowel Crohn's disease was diagnosed in 41 of 52 patients (79%). CE was not accomplished in 14 patients due to bowel strictures. Of the remaining 27 patients, CE, MRI, and fluoroscopy detected small bowel Crohn's disease in 25 (93%), 21 (78%), and 7 (of 21; 33%) cases, respectively. CE was the only diagnostic tool in four patients. CE was slightly more sensitive than MRI (12 v 10 of 13 in suspected Crohn's disease and 13 v 11 of 14 in established Crohn's disease). MRI detected inflammatory conglomerates and enteric fistulae in three and two cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: CE and MRI are complementary methods for diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease. CE is capable of detecting limited mucosal lesions that may be missed by MRI, but awareness of bowel obstruction is mandatory. In contrast, MRI is helpful in identifying transmural Crohn's disease and extraluminal lesions, and may exclude strictures.     

Effectiveness and safety of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel diseases

GOALS: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and clinical use of capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel diseases. STUDY: Systematic review carried out in the main electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE. Papers were selected independently by the 2 researchers and the quality was determined using a purpose-designed scale. RESULTS: A total of 9 systematic reviews and 28 original papers were included [11 assessed obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, 9 Crohn's disease (CD), and 4 hereditary polyposis syndromes]. The diagnostic yield of CE for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding ranged from 39% to 77%. The diagnostic yield of push enteroscopy was lower than 40% in all but 1 study. CE detected suggestive findings in 19% to 71% of patients with suspected CD, whereas radiologic techniques did so in only 0% to 37% of the cases. In patients with suspected recurrence, detection with these techniques was 58% to 81% and 19% to 67%, respectively. Endoscopic capsule detected a greater number of polyps in patients with polyposis syndromes but other techniques allowed for better localization. CONCLUSIONS: Although CE occupies a preferential place in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding and CD; there is insufficient evidence to establish whether it could be used as a first line diagnostic test. The evidence is insufficient to ascertain this technique's usefulness in small bowel disorders other than obscure bleeding or CD.     

胶囊内镜与单气囊小肠镜对可疑小肠疾病的诊断价值

目的比较胶囊内镜与单气囊小肠镜对小肠疾病的诊断价值。方法 2009年6月-2011年12月共有37例疑诊为小肠疾病的患者接受了胶囊内镜(CE)和单气囊小肠镜(SBE)检查。比较两种检查方法对小肠疾病的检出情况。结果在37例患者中,CE检查发现阳性病变28例,总体诊断率为75.68%(28/37),SBE检查发现阳性病变33例,总体诊断率为89.19%(33/37),两者之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.221)。CE和SBE检查结果不一致,CE检查阳性而SBE检查阴性3例,CE检查阴性而SBE检查阳性8例,CE和SBE检查均阴性1例。CE全小肠检查完成率为94.59%(35/37);SBE全小肠检查完成率为57.14%(4/7)。两种检查方法均未发生严重并发症。结论胶囊内镜和单气囊小肠镜对小肠疾病的诊断价值相当。     

How much helpful is the capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of small bowel lesions？

AIM: To assess the practically usefulness and diagnostic yield of this new method in a group of patients with suspected small bowel lesions. METHODS: Capsule endoscopic (CE) examination by using M2A capsule endoscope TM (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) was performed in thirty nine patients (26 males, 13 females) with suspected small intestinal lesions. The composing of the patients was as follows: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in twenty three patients, known Crohn's disease in 6 patients, in whom CE was used to evaluate the severity and extension of the diseases, chronic diarrhea in 8 patients, abdominal pain in one patient and malignancy in one patient with unknown origin. RESULTS: In two patients CE failed. Different abnormalities were revealed in 26 patients overall. Detection rate of abnormalities was highest among patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and the source of bleeding was demonstrated in 17 of 23 patients with obscure bleeding (73.9%). Entero-Behcet was diagnosed in two patients by CE as a source of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. In 6 patients with known Crohn's disease, CE revealed better evaluation of the disease extension. In 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with chronic diarrhea; CE revealed some mucosal abnormalities as the cause of chronic diarrhea. In a patient with unexplained abdominal pain and in a cancer patient with unknown origin, CE examination was normal. CONCLUSION: In our relatively small series, we found that capsule endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool particularly in diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic diarrhea and in estimating the extension of Crohn's disease.     

胶囊内镜与推进式小肠镜诊断不明原因消化道出血的评价

目的 比较胶囊内镜与推进式小肠镜对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值。方法 总结32例消化道出血患者的胶囊内镜检查结果及36例消化道出血患者推进式小肠镜检查结果，上述患者均经结肠镜、胃镜、X线钡餐、小肠钡剂灌肠、血管造影或核素扫描等检查未发现异常。结果 胶囊内镜检查的32例中共发现异常26例，检出率为8l％。其中能明确解释出血原因者2l例，包括消化道血管病变8例，小肠炎症性肠病5例，小肠息肉4例，小肠恶性间质肿瘤2例，小肠类癌l例(该患者同时伴升结肠脂肪瘤)及出血性胃炎l例；疑诊5例。推进式小肠镜检查的36例明确出血原因9例，即诊断率为25％，包括空肠上段血管畸形2例，平滑肌肉瘤2例，平滑肌瘤、腺瘤性息肉、克罗恩病、壶腹部腺癌及淋巴瘤各l例；疑诊2例。结论 胶囊内镜对不明原因消化道出血具有较高的检出率和诊断率，检查效果及方法明显优于推进式小肠镜。胶囊内镜可明显简化不明原因消化道出血患者的检查步骤．应成为经胃镜、结肠镜检查阴性患者的首选检查方法。     

Capsule endoscopy:Current practice and future directions

Capsule endoscopy(CE)has transformed investigation of the small bowel providing a non-invasive,well tolerated means of accurately visualising the distal duodenum,jejunum and ileum.Since the introduction of small bowel CE thirteen years ago a high volume of literature on indications,diagnostic yields and safety profile has been presented.Inclusion in national and international guidelines has placed small bowel capsule endoscopy at the forefront of investigation into suspected diseases of the small bowel.Most commonly,small bowel CE is used in patients with suspected bleeding or to identify evidence of active Crohn’s disease(CD)(in patients with or without a prior history of CD).Typically,CE is undertaken after upper and lower gastrointestinal flexible endoscopy has failed to identify a diagnosis.Small bowel radiology or a patency capsule test should be considered prior to CE in those at high risk of strictures(such as patients known to have CD or presenting with obstructive symptoms)to reduce the risk of capsule retention.CE also has a role in patients with coeliac disease,suspected small bowel tumours and other small bowel disorders.Since the advent of small bowel CE,dedicated oesophageal and colon capsule endoscopes have expanded the fields of application to include the investigation of upper and lower gastrointestinal disorders.Oesophageal CE may be used to diagnose oesophagitis,Barrett’s oesophagus and varices but reliability in identifying gastroduodenal pathology is unknown and it does not have biopsy capability.Colon CE provides an alternative to conventional colonoscopy for symptomatic patients,while a possible role in colorectal cancer screening is a fascinating prospect.Current research is already addressing the possibility of controlling capsule movement and developing capsules which allow tissue sampling and the administration of therapy.     

Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease with wireless capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND: The small bowel is the most commonly affected site of Crohn's disease (CD) although it may involve any part of the gastrointestinal tract. The current methodologies for examining the small bowel are x ray and endoscopy. AIMS: To evaluate, for the first time, the effectiveness of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected CD of the small bowel undetected by conventional modalities, and to determine the diagnostic yield of the M2A Given Capsule. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients (eight males, mean age 40 (15) years) with suspected CD fulfilled study entry criteria: nine had iron deficiency anaemia (mean haemoglobin 10.5 (SD 1.8) g%), eight had abdominal pain, seven had diarrhoea, and three had weight loss. Small bowel x ray and upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic findings were normal. Mean duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 6.3 (SD 2.2) years. METHODS: Each subject swallowed an M2A Given Capsule containing a miniature video camera, batteries, a transmitter, and an antenna. Recording time was approximately eight hours. The capsule was excreted naturally in the patient's bowel movement, and the data it contained were retrieved and interpreted the next day. RESULTS: Of the 17 study participants, 12 (70.6%, six males, mean age 34.5 (12) years) were diagnosed as having CD of the small bowel according to the findings of the M2A Given Capsule. CONCLUSIONS: Wireless capsule endoscopy diagnosed CD of the small bowel (diagnostic yield of 71%). It was demonstrated as being an effective modality for diagnosing patients with suspected CD undetected by conventional diagnostic methodologies.