腹腔镜与开放式巨大腹壁切口疝补片修补术的对比分析

目的:比较开放手术及腹腔镜补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术效果。方法:回顾分析我院2003年1月至2007年6月收治的43例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(16例)和开放组(27例),对两组手术时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间等进行对比分析。结果:两组手术时间、术后并发症发生率无明显差异。开放手术组2例发生切口感染,1例经冲洗引流2个月治愈,另1例再次手术取出补片。腹腔镜手术组术后住院时间和手术出血量明显少于开放手术组。术后随访4~48个月,平均21个月,两组均无复发病例。结论:腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝同样安全、合理,且具有患者创伤小、康复快和术后住院时间短等优点。     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜下腹腔内网片植入法和开放式肌后筋膜前补片修补法治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效比较

【摘要】 目的〓比较腹腔镜下腹腔内网片植入法(IPOM)和开放式肌后筋膜前补片修补法(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法〓回顾性分析30例腹腔镜应用IPOM法和28例开放式应用Sublay法治疗腹壁切口疝的病例,比较其手术疗效及术后患者生活质量。结果〓两组手术时间、平均住院时间、术中出血量及术后并发症比较,腹腔镜组均明显优于开放手术组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论〓应用腹腔镜行IPOM治疗腹壁巨大切口疝安全可行,具有有创伤小,住院时间短,恢复快,术后并发症少的优点。     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

3D腹腔镜联合杂交技术在腹壁巨大切口疝中的应用体会

目的:探讨3D腹腔镜联合杂交技术治疗腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果。方法:回顾分析2012年5月至2016年4月为25例腹壁巨大切口疝患者行3D腹腔镜联合杂交技术腹壁切口疝无张力修补术的临床资料,记录围手术期情况,总结其治疗效果。结果:25例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间平均(111.7±11.3)min,切口长度平均(7.1±3.5)cm,术中出血量平均(55.1±7.7)ml,术后平均住院(6.7±1.6)d;4例患者术后使用止痛剂。术中肠道浆膜损伤1例,未影响补片修补;术后切口轻度感染1例,积极治疗后痊愈,未取出补片,无血清肿、肠瘘等其他并发症发生。术后随访24个月,随访率100%,无一例复发。结论:3D腹腔镜联合杂交技术治疗腹壁巨大切口疝是安全、有效、可行、实用的,治疗效果较好,结合了腹腔镜与开放手术的优点,术后患者康复快,美容效果好,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术18例体会

目的探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的临床应用价值及安全性。方法回顾分析2007年9月至2009年3月18例大或巨大腹壁切口疝患者采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料。结果18例手术均在腹腔镜下完成,其中1例术中因广泛致密黏连,做小切口直视下分离黏连回纳疝内容物后缝合切口腹腔镜下完成后续操作,手术时间45—90min,平均60min;术后4—48h患者下床活动,1—2天排气,术后疼痛轻,3—6天后大部分患者疼痛明显缓解,术后住院3～14天,平均5天,术后随访2～20个月,1例诉慢性疼痛,1例术后1个月出现补片感染,后经开腹取出补片膨体聚四氟乙烯面,随访5个月未见疝复发。结论腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝相对于开放修补方法具有微创、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是一种安全可靠的手术方法。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例分析

目的 分析应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果，讨论应用复合补片的手术方法和经验体会。方法 1999年5月～2005年5月应用复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例，其中皮下置片法12例，腹腔内法18例。平均随访期36个月。结果 术后复发2例，占6．7％。切口并发症33．3％，切口感染5例，均为皮下法；皮下积液5例，其中皮下法3例，腹腔内法2例。结论 腹壁巨大切口疝，特别是传统法难以修补的，可应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合补片修补。应用腹腔内法及正确的术中、术后处理可减少术后并发症的发生。     

老年巨大腹壁切口疝的外科治疗

目的 探讨老年巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法并总结围手术期处理经验.方法 我院普外科2002 年1月至2011年1月采用单丝聚丙烯补片行开放式腹壁巨大切口疝修补术共21例,其中行肌前补片修补法(Onlay)3例,肌肉间补片修补法(Inlay)1例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法(Sublay)15例,腹腔内补片修补法(IPOM)2例.结果 手术时间(140.5±22.7)min;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症.无围手术期死亡,无切口感染及复发病例.结论 应用单丝聚丙烯补片无张力修补术治疗老年巨大腹壁切口疝安全可靠,加强围手术期合并症的处理可以减少术后并发症的发生.     

补片修补腹壁切口疝的临床应用

目的探讨腹壁切口疝的治疗。方法回顾性分析150例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。（1）肌腱膜上补片置入手术（ONLAY）126例；（2）筋膜前（腹膜前）、肌下补片置入手术（SUBLAY）4例；（3）缺损处直接补片置入途径（INLAY）13例；（4）腹膜腔内补片置入术（Introperitonealsite）7例。结果平均年龄58．5岁，女性占52．5％。上腹部切口36％，下腹部切口占64％。全部采用合成材料修补。聚丙烯材料130例，聚四氟乙烯-聚丙烯双面材料16例，强生Proceed补片4例，开腹手术143例，腹腔镜手术7例。复发3例，手术复发率为2％。结论ONLAY手术安全可靠，复发率低，是可以接受的切口疝修补方法，避免伤口感染，防治腹内压升高，促进伤口愈合，保证缝合质量是预防切口疝关键。     

Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair

BACKGROUND: An improved understanding of load-bearing soft tissue repair suggests that the mechanism for the improved outcomes after alloplastic incisional herniorrhaphy involves more than simple tissue replacement or material strength. We test the hypothesis that postrepair abdominal wall elastic properties are most predictive of successful abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: A rodent model of chronic incisional hernia formation was used. Midline incisional hernias were repaired primarily with suture (n = 24) or polypropylene mesh (n = 24). Rodents were sacrificed at serial postoperative time points over 60 days. Intact abdominal wall strips were cut perpendicular to the wound for tensiometric analysis. Biopsies of wound provisional matrix were obtained for biochemical analysis. RESULTS: Recurrent incisional hernia formation was significantly decreased in the mesh-repair group, compared with the suture-repair group (5/24 vs 14/24, P = .02). Mesh-repaired abdominal walls demonstrated significantly more elongation (P < .01) and less stiffness (P < .01). Toughness was equal between wounds, although the suture-repaired wounds had increased recovery of tensile strength (P < .01). There were no significant differences in collagen deposition after postoperative day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties as measured by increased elongation and reduced stiffness. Increased abdominal wall elasticity after incisional hernia repair in turn results in lower recurrence rates.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal wall or parastomal hernias following major genitourinary or abdominal surgery are a significant surgical problem. Open surgical repair is difficult because of adhesion formation and poor definition of the hernia fascial edges. Laparoscopic intervention has allowed effective correction of these abdominal wall hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to June 2000, 14 male and 3 female patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at our institution. Of these, 13 patients received incisional and 4 parastomal hernia repair. All hernia defects were repaired using a measured piece of Gore-Tex DualMesh. A retrospective review of each patient's history and operative characteristics was undertaken. RESULTS: All repairs were successful. No patient required conversion to an open procedure, and there were no intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 4 (range 2.5-6.5) and 4.3 (range 3.75-5.5) hours in the incisional and parastomal group, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.9 days (range 2-12) for the incisional group and 3.8 (range 3-4) days for the parastomal group. To date, two patients experienced a recurrence of incisional hernias, at 5 and 8 months postoperatively. No recurrences have developed in the parastomal hernia repairs at 2 to 33 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall incisional or parastomal hernias provides an excellent anatomic correction of such defects. Adhesions are lysed under magnified laparoscopic vision, and the true limits of the fascial defects are clearly identified. The DualMesh is easy to work with and has yielded excellent results. A comparison with open repair with respect to perioperative factors and long-term success is currently under way.     

应用脱细胞真皮基质材料修补复杂腹壁切口疝

目的 探讨脱细胞真皮基质材料对复杂的腹壁切口疝的修复治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析2008年1月至2010年6月间使用脱细胞真皮基质(acellular dermal matrix,ADM)材料修补的7例复杂的腹壁切口疝的治疗方法.其中男4例,女3例,年龄43～83岁,中位年龄53岁;7例中有2例伴有腹股沟斜疝,给予同时修补;5例同时进行了胃肠道手术,其中有2例伴有小肠瘘;疝环直径为9.2 ～16.5 cm,平均(11.6±2.8)cm;5例使用腹腔内修补(intraperitoneal onlay mesh,IPOM),2例为腹膜外修补(total extraperitoneal prothesis,TEP).结果 本组患者均手术顺利,放置ADM补片至关腹结束的平均手术时间(33±12) min;术中平均出血量(16±4) ml;住院时间7～12d.所有使用ADM的患者均痊愈出院,术后未发现有慢性疼痛、感觉异常、肺炎、尿路感染等并发症,手术切口无红肿、溃破、无血清肿.7例均获随访,随访时间5 ～26个月,中位随访时间为14个月,随访期间未发现浅部感染或深部感染,无疝复发.结论 脱细胞真皮基质材料作为一种新的生物补片,适用于复杂腹壁切口疝,尤其是伴有污染的腹壁切口疝的修补.     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝九例体会

目的　总结应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝。方法　回顾分析应用涤纶布 ,聚丙烯和膨体聚四氟乙烯补片修补 9例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的术前准备 ,手术方法和引流放置。结果　 9例均治愈 ,随访 4个月～ 1 2年无复发。结论　应用补片无张力修补巨大腹壁切口疝是一种简单、易行和有效的方法。     

人脱细胞真皮在腹壁缺损修复中的应用

目的:探讨人脱细胞真皮(human acellular dermal marx,HADM)在腹壁缺损修复中的应用.方法:回顾我院外科自2007年5月至2008年9月14例使用HADM修复腹壁缺损病人的临床资料,分析手术效果及并发症的发生率.结果:14例均顺利重建腹壁,无感染及肠梗阻、肠瘘等并发症发生;随访1～16月,无疝复发和其他类型腹壁疝出现.结论:HADM在腹壁缺损的修复上具有一定优势,尤其是在处理感染或污染创面时,是一种值得在临床上推广应用的理想补片材料.     

Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: A review of Eisenhower Army Medical Center's experience using Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Covington, Georgia) for the repair of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol. RESULTS: From July 30, 2003 to February 12, 2005, 9 patients underwent repair of complicated fascial defects with Permacol. Indications for surgery included reoperative incisional hernia repair after removal of a infected mesh (3 patients), reconstruction of a fascial defect after resection of an abdominal wall tumor (2 patients), incisional hernia repair in a patient with a previous abdominal wall infection after a primary incisional hernia repair (1 patient), incisional hernia repair in a patient with an ostomy and an open midline wound (1 patient), emergent repair of incisional hernia with strangulated bowel and multiple intra-abdominal abscesses (1 patient), and excision of infected mesh and drainage of intra-abdominal abscess with synchronous repair of the abdominal wall defect (1 patient). At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, 1 recurrent hernia existed after intentional removal of the Permacol. This patient developed an abdominal wall abscess 7 months after hernia repair secondary to erosion from a suture. Overall, 1 patient developed exposure of the Permacol after a skin dehiscence. The wound was treated with local wound care, and the Permacol was salvaged. Despite the presence of contamination (wound classification II, III, or IV) in 5 of 9 patients (56%), no infectious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Complex reconstruction of the abdominal wall can be associated with a high complication rate. Placement of a permanent prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field is associated with a high rate of wound infections and subsequent mesh removal. Permacol becomes incorporated by tissue ingrowth and neovascularization. Permacol is a safe and acceptable alternative to prosthetic mesh in the repair of complicated abdominal wall defects.     

腹壁切口疝64例治疗体会

目的探讨腹壁切口疝的治疗及其围手术期处理。方法回顾性分析我院2000年1月~2004年10月64例腹壁切口疝的治疗经过。结果行单纯性疝修补术20例,无张力补片修补术44例。随访8~45月,无一例复发。结论应用聚丙烯补片、术前腹带加压包扎2周、术前预防性应用抗生素及常规肠道准备对于防治腹壁切口疝是安全、经济、可靠的方法。     

Progressive fascial wound failure impairs subsequent abdominal wall repairs: a new animal model of incisional hernia formation

BACKGROUND: Fascial wound failure alters the phenotype of the abdominal wall. This study introduces a novel animal model of progressive failure of the ventral abdominal wall fascia, which generates large incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mechanistic model of incisional hernia was compared with a model of acute myofascial defect hernia repair. Using biological tissue repair markers, tensiometric measurements and recurrent hernia rate, we measured the mechanism by which incisional hernias regenerate abdominal wall structure and function after mesh and suture herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Recurrent incisional hernia formation was significantly increased after repairs of the hernia model, compared with the myofascial defect model (6/16 vs 0/16, P < .05). In the hernia model, there were significant decreases in the recovery of wound strength, energy, and extensibility before mechanical disruption, compared with the myofascial defect model. Unexpectedly, excision of fascial hernia wound edges did not significantly improve tissue repair outcomes in the hernia model group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically accurate animal modeling can recreate the wound pathology expressed in mature incisional hernias. Progressive fascial wound failure decreases the fidelity of subsequent incisional hernia repair, compared with identically sized acute abdominal wall defect repairs. The mechanism appears to include decreased fascial wound strength and decreased tissue compliance after herniorrhaphy.     

54例腹部切口疝病因分析

目的探讨腹壁切口疝的发病原因。方法从切口类型、切口感染、腹内压增高、年龄、营养状况、发生时间等方面对54例切1：3疝进行回顾性分析。结果腹壁纵行切口、切口感染、腹内压增高及高龄、肥胖、代谢性疾病等因素的存在易诱发切口疝。54例切口疝患者中,6例小切口疝及5例中切口疝采用传统方法直接缝合修补,余病例均采用材料修补,随访0．5～3年,1例复发,经材料修补后痊愈。结论（1）围手术期应积极预防感染;（2）在不影响手术操作及安全的前提下,采用横向切口;（3）术后半年内注意防护,尽量避免一切诱发因素;（4）围手术期加强营养,控制血糖,治疗可引起腹内压增高的合并症。