Antiplatelet drugs in cardiovascular prevention: take adverse effects and costs into account

(1) Several antiplatelet drugs have proven preventive efficacy, including aspirin, aspirin + dipyridamole, clopidogrel, ticlopidine and flurbiprofen. They differ mainly in their adverse effects and costs. (2) Aspirin has essentially gastrointestinal adverse effects, whose incidence can be limited by prescribing a daily dose below 350 mg. (3) The addition of dipyridamole to aspirin can cause headache and diarrhoea. (4) Ticlopidine should be avoided because of the risk of agranulocytosis. (5) Adverse effects are less frequent and less severe with clopidogrel than with ticlopidine. (6) Like other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, flurbiprofen has mainly gastrointestinal adverse effects. (7) Treatment is least costly with low-dose aspirin and most costly with clopidogrel.     

Secondary stroke prevention: inside the vessels and beyond

Cerebral ischaemic stroke is frequently a relapsing, if not chronic, disease. Its incidence is age-dependent, and with the ageing of society the need for effective therapies increases.This review considers current and alternative hypotheses underlying secondary prevention of stroke. Currently, secondary stroke prevention is widely practiced with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), a drug that has been in use for more than 100 years. Newer drugs such as ticlopidine and clopidogrel have subsequently been developed, but their efficacy barely surpasses that of aspirin. Other drugs used in secondary stroke prevention include HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and antihypertensive agents.The endovascular paradigm has shaped the thinking of secondary stroke prevention, and aspirin, ticlopidine and clopidogrel are known as 'platelet inhibitors'; however, their pharmacological and clinical effects are not fully explained within the platelet paradigm. Moreover, in recent years, reduction of stroke incidence has also been observed with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, regardless of their lipid-lowering effects. Hence, current understanding needs to be supplemented by considering mechanisms beyond platelet inhibition. Evidence has shown that aspirin, ticlopidine and clopidogrel share neuroprotective properties not explained by the platelet paradigm and that are reminiscent of a preconditioning effect. This neuroprotective mechanism is also shared with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.     

Ticlopidine. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in platelet-dependent disorders

Ticlopidine inhibits platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and most other platelet agonists in ex vivo studies of human platelets. The drug also improves other abnormalities of platelet function seen in patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, ischaemic heart disease or other conditions involving platelet hyperaggregation. Abnormal platelet activity has been implicated in a variety of clinical conditions in which patients are at high risk of thromboembolic events, and thus the effectiveness of ticlopidine has been investigated in such patients. Since the initial review of the drug appeared in the Journal, data from several large multicentre studies have shown that ticlopidine has a substantial benefit to offer patients who have experienced transient ischaemic attacks or stroke, and in those with peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease. Ticlopidine reduces the incidence of further stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death, and is superior to placebo and aspirin in this regard in studies of patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attacks, or intermittent claudication. Ticlopidine is equally effective in both men and women and also improves symptoms of claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease, and appears to reduce anginal pain. Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and sickle cell disease have shown some improvement with ticlopidine administration. The drug reduces thromboembolic events and re-stenosis in patients undergoing haemodialysis and cardiac surgery, and appears to prevent the progression of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ticlopidine in large clinical trials is associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo and an overall incidence similar to aspirin. Most adverse effects do not require withdrawal of treatment. Gastrointestinal symptoms (particularly diarrhoea) are most common, occurring almost twice as frequently with ticlopidine as with aspirin. Other adverse effects associated with ticlopidine include skin rash, haemorrhagic disorders, and haematological effects; these latter effects require careful monitoring of patients during the initial weeks of therapy. In conclusion, ticlopidine is a valuable addition to the prophylactic treatments available for the management of patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease, who present a high risk of thromboembolic events. Although tolerability may be a problem for some patients, the overall benefit conferred by the drug would appear to outweigh this potential disadvantage. Because of its antiplatelet activity, ticlopidine has a promising role in other disorders mediated by platelet dysfunction. However, the precise role of the drug in these additional therapeutic indications awaits clarification with wider clinical experience.     

Clopidogrel: new preparation. An alternative to aspirin

(1) Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug chemically similar to ticlopidine, is marketed in France for secondary prevention of thrombotic complications in patients with a history of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or peripheral arterial disease. (2) Marketing authorisation was based mainly on the CAPRIE trial, a study that involved 19,815 patients. In this trial of secondary cardiovascular prevention, clopidogrel was slightly more effective than aspirin (325 mg/day) according to a statistical analysis of a combined end point (ischaemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, or death of vascular causes). The difference was more marked in the subgroup of patients with obstructive arterial disease of the lower limbs. (3) Clopidogrel was well tolerated in this trial. The only adverse effects more frequent on clopidogrel than on aspirin were rash and diarrhoea. (4) Clopidogrel showed no haematological toxicity, an adverse effect that restricts the use of ticlopidine. (5) The lack of long-term follow-up in real clinical settings prevents any meaningful estimation of the safety profile or of the risk of drug interactions.     

Editorial Commentary

Thrombotic events of the arterial circulation continue to be the major cause of cardiovascular death in spite of great efforts to prevent and treat thrombosis. Current antithrombotic strategies in clinical use are primarily based on aspirin (antiplatelet), heparin (anticoagulant) and coumadins (chronic anticoagulants). Recently, ReoPro®, an antibody blocking the platelet fibrinogen receptor, GpIIb/IIIa, has been introduced for limited acute use for prevention of ischaemic complications of coronary balloon angioplasty. Clopidogrel is a novel antiplatelet agent that has demonstrated antithrombotic efficacy beyond aspirin in preclinical studies and is now in clinical (Phase II) development for secondary prevention of broad ischaemic cardiovascular events including death. Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist with additional properties that produce effective and long-lasting antithrombotic actions. Clopidogrel seems to be free of the adverse side-effects that flawed ticlopidine, a closely related thieno-derivative, and is at least six-fold more potent. It is expected that clopidogrel will add significantly to the antichrombotic arsenal and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality above and beyond currently available therapy.     

Review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and safety of proton pump inhibitors and aspirin

The efficacy of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases has been convincingly demonstrated. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects with aspirin may lead to poor adherence and/or discontinuation of treatment. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been used for more than 20 years as the first choice for treating peptic ulcers and their bleeding complications, gastroesophageal reflux disease, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced GI lesions and dyspepsia. Adherence becomes a major concern when aspirin is co-prescribed with PPIs to prevent GI adverse effects. Combining aspirin and PPIs into one tablet is an effective approach to address aspirin-related GI adverse effects and increase adherence to aspirin therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.     

RACTS: a prospective randomized antiplatelet trial of cilostazol versus ticlopidine in patients undergoing coronary stenting: long-term clinical and angiographic outcome

We compared the efficacy of cilostazol for the prevention of late restenosis and acute or subacute stent thrombosis with that of ticlopidine. Cilostazol has been used for antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation, but the results are controversial. Patients scheduled for stent implantation were randomly assigned to receive either cilostazol (100 mg twice daily for 6 months, n=201) or ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily for 1 month, n=196). All patients also received oral aspirin (100 mg once daily for 6 months). Coronary angiography was performed at baseline and immediately and 6 months after coronary stenting. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 9 months postprocedure. There was no significant difference in the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis between the 2 groups [cilostazol (1.5%) versus ticlopidine (3.6%), P=0.216], but the target lesion revascularization rate per patient was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group (22.9% vs 32.7%, P=0.030) 9 months post-coronary stenting. Medication withdrawn because of drug-related side effects tended to be higher in the ticlopidine group than that in the cilostazol group (3.5% vs 8.2%, P=0.054). At follow-up angiography, the minimal luminal diameters (2.31+/-1.06 vs 2.10+/-1.16, P=0.057) tended to be larger and the restenosis rates lower (23.3% vs 30.9%, P=0.086) in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group. Aspirin plus cilostazol is a comparable antithrombotic regimen to aspirin plus ticlopidine after elective coronary stenting, but the rate of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group.     

Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of atherothrombosis

Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist that is indicated for the reduction of atherosclerotic events including myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and vascular death in patients with atherosclerosis manifested by recent stroke, myocardial infarction or established peripheral vascular disease. In the 19 185 patients enrolled in the multicentre, randomised double-blind CAPRIE study, the annual risk of the combined end-point of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death from vascular disease (vascular death) was significantly lower during treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg/day than aspirin 325 mg/day [5.3 vs 5.8%/year, respectively; relative risk reduction (RRR) 8.7%, p = 0.043] after a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. Clopidogrel provided even greater reductions in the risk of recurrent ischaemic events than aspirin in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, diabetes mellitus and in those receiving concomitant lipid-lowering therapy. Moreover there was a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalisation in patients treated with clopidogrel. In a patient population (Saskatchewan, Canada) with a greater risk of ischaemic events than the CAPRIE study population, the number of patients needed to be treated with clopidogrel to prevent 1 ischaemic event was estimated to be 70 (vs 200 in the CAPRIE study). In randomised trials and registry surveys, clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus aspirin had similar efficacy (as measured by adverse cardiac outcomes) to ticlopidine 250mg twice daily plus aspirin during the 30 days after placement of intracoronary stents. Tolerability of clopidogrel was significantly better than ticlopidine in the randomised, double-blind CLASSICS study. Among patients treated with clopidogrel or aspirin in the CAPRIE study, the overall gastrointestinal tolerability of clopidogrel was generally better than that of aspirin; the frequency of gastrointestinal haemorrhage was significantly lower among patients treated with clopidogrel than aspirin. Diarrhoea, rash and pruritis were significantly more common with clopidogrel than aspirin. CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel was significantly more effective than aspirin in the prevention of vascular events (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death) [corrected] in patients with atherothrombotic disease manifested by recent myocardial infarction, recent ischaemic stroke or symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease [corrected] in the CAPRIE study. The overall tolerability profile of the drug was similar to that of aspirin, although gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred significantly less often in clopidogrel recipients. The drug is widely used in combination with aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis after placement of intravascular stents, and available data suggest that this combination is as effective as ticlopidine plus aspirin for this indication.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sibrafiban alone or in combination with ticlopidine and aspirin

AIMS: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effects of a ticlopidine/aspirin combination on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sibrafiban and the tolerability of the combination therapy METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive one of the following treatments for 7 days: sibrafiban (n = 12), ticlopidine/aspirin (n = 12), or the combination treatment sibrafiban/ticlopidine/aspirin (n = 14). Concentrations of the active metabolite of sibrafiban, Ro 44-3888, in plasma and urine were determined by column-switching liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacodynamics of sibrafiban and ticlopidine/aspirin were examined by measuring the inhibition of ADP- or collagen-induced platelet aggregation. RESULTS: The addition of ticlopidine/aspirin to sibrafiban did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of Ro 44-3888. the geometric mean ratio for AUC(0,12h) was 110 (95% CI 0.82, 1.22). Separately, sibrafiban and ticlopidine/aspirin inhibited ADP-and collagen-induced platelet aggregation and the effects of the two treatments were additive. For example, the average inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation over 12 h was 42% in the sibrafiban treated group, 55% in the ticlopidine/aspirin group and 69% in the sibrafiban/ticlopidine group. The bleeding time was prolonged in the treatments with ticlopidine/aspirin (8.1 min) and sibrafiban/ticlopidine/aspirin (8. 6 min) compared with sibrafiban alone (3.5 min). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant pharmacodynamic interaction between sibrafiban and ticlopidine/aspirin. Consequently, the simultaneous administration of sibrafiban and ticlopidine/aspirin should be carefully monitored to ensure the patient's coverage with an antiplatelet drug without exposure to an excessive bleeding risk.     

Clopidogrel and [symbol: see text] ticlopidine--improvements on aspirin?

Clopidogrel (Plavix-Sanofi Winthrop/Bristol-Myers Squibb) and [symbol: see text] ticlopidine (Ticlid-Sanofi Winthrop) are inhibitors of platelet function and are promoted as potential alternatives to aspirin. Clopidogrel is licensed for the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease. The manufacturer claims that clopidogrel is "significantly more effective at reducing myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular death" compared to aspirin. Ticlopidine is licensed as an alternative to aspirin for secondary prevention of stroke and coronary complications in patients with intermittent claudication. However, in the UK, ticlopidine is more commonly used with aspirin to prevent complications following insertion of coronary stents during angioplasty. We consider whether the claims for clopidogrel and the current use of ticlopidine are justified.     

Analgesic efficacy of amfenac, aspirin and placebo after extraction of impacted teeth

Amfenac, an arylacetic acid derivative, is a new investigational, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent that has exhibited analgesic properties superior to those of phenylbutazone in animals. This double-blind, randomized, parallel study was an early clinical trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of one oral dose of amfenac 100 mg compared to aspirin 600 mg and placebo in 120 subjects with moderate to severe pain after extraction of impacted molar teeth. Self-evaluated subjective pain intensity and relief reports for 4 hours were used as indexes of response. Analgesic effects of amfenac were significantly superior to those of placebo (p less than 0.001) and aspirin (p less than 0.05) by most measurements. Aspirin 600 mg was superior to placebo based on total pain relief and global scores (p less than 0.05). Compared with aspirin 600 mg, amfenac 100 mg provided greater and faster analgesia, lasting at least for 4 hours. Ordinal pain intensity scores correlated well with the visual pain analog scale. Seven (17.5%) patients taking amfenac compared to 5 (12.5%) taking placebo reported minor adverse effects).     

Economic assessment of the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke with dipyridamole plus aspirin (Aggrenox/Asasantin) in France

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of aspirin 25 mg plus dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke, according to the French social security perspective, using efficacy data from the second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS-2). The ESPS-2 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial which assessed the efficacy of four secondary prevention strategies: (i) placebo; (ii) aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 25 mg twice daily; (iii) dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily; and (iv) aspirin 25 mg plus dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily. METHOD: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis with Monte Carlo simulations to compute confidence intervals. We combined data from various sources including the Dijon Stroke Registry, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, Etude du Co?t de l'Infarctus Cérébral (Study of the Cost of Cerebral Infarction [ECIC]) study and the ESPS-2 trial. RESULTS: According to our findings, a preventive strategy with aspirin 25 mg plus dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily is associated with net benefits per avoided stroke recurrence amounting to USD 23,932 (95% CI -USD 32,609, USD 35,772) compared with aspirin 25 mg twice daily alone, and USD 31,555 (95% CI USD 4921, USD 74,515) compared with dipyridamole alone (1997 values). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that dipyridamole plus aspirin was still cost effective when the average cost of adverse effects per episode (ignored in the original estimation of the cost-effectiveness ratios due to a lack of data) was assumed to be USD 8600 (50,000 French francs); this cost is unlikely as most of the adverse effects associated with aspirin plus dipyridamole are only slight to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: In the secondary prevention of stroke in France, this study suggests, given its underlying assumptions and data, that aspirin 25 mg plus dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily is likely to be a cost-effective strategy from the social security perspective, when compared with other relevant strategies that were evaluated in the ESPS-2 trial.     

Flurbiprofen in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea.

1 In a double-blind crossover study, flurbiprofen produced marked relief of pain which was significantly more than with aspirin and placebo in patients suffering from primary dysmenorrhoea. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the relief of pain obtained with aspirin and placebo. 2 The clinician's overall assessment of efficacy also indicated that flurbiprofen produced better response as compared to aspirin and placebo in these patients with dysmenorrhoea. 3 Both flurbiprofen and aspirin did not produce any apparent adverse effects on blood loss during the menstrual period. 4 In conclusion, the analgesic effect of flurbiprofen seen in this trial establishes the therapeutic usefulness of the drug in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea.     

Indobufen: an updated review of its use in the management of atherothrombosis

Indobufen inhibits platelet aggregation by reversibly inhibiting the platelet cyclooxygenase enzyme thereby suppressing thromboxane synthesis. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of oral indobufen in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with or without atrial fibrillation, in the prevention of graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and in the treatment of intermittent claudication. In the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events indobufen 200 mg once or twice daily was significantly more effective than no treatment although not as effective as ticlopidine 250 mg once or twice daily, during 1-year nonblind clinical trials. Compared with placebo, indobufen 100 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk of stroke in a small 28-month trial of patients at increased risk of systemic embolism (50% had atrial fibrillation). Furthermore, in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a recent cerebrovascular event enrolled in the 1-year Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale (SIFA) trial, indobufen 100 or 200 mg twice daily was as effective as warfarin (titrated to produce an international normalised ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events; the incidences of the composite end-point of major vascular events (10.6 vs 9.0%) and recurrent stroke (5 vs 4%) were similar between treatments. In 2 large 12-month trials, the Studio Indobufene nel Bypass Aortocoronarico (SINBA) and the UK study, indobufen 200 mg twice daily was as effective as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 300 or 325 mg plus dipyridamole 75 mg 3 times daily in the prevention of early and late occlusion of saphenous grafts in patients after CABG surgery. Indobufen 200 mg twice daily for 6 months significantly improved walking capacity compared with placebo, and caused a more pronounced improvement in both pain-free and total walking distance than either pentoxifylline 300 mg or aspirin 500 mg twice daily in separate 6- and 12-month studies of patients with intermittent claudication. Oral indobufen up to 200 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated in >5000 patients with atherosclerotic disease. Adverse events (predominantly gastrointestinal), reported by 3.9% of patients, rarely required withdrawal from treatment. In the SINBA and UK studies, fewer adverse events and less gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with indobufen than with aspirin plus dipyridamole treatment, while in the SIFA trial, noncerebral bleeding events occurred significantly less frequently in indobufen than warfarin recipients (0.6 vs 5.1%) and major bleeding events occurred only in the warfarin group. Conclusion: Indobufen is as effective as warfarin in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, as aspirin plus dipyridamole in the prevention of CABG occlusion and may be more effective than aspirin or pentoxifylline in improving walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. The improved tolerability profile of indobufen (favourable gastric tolerance and reduced haemorrhagic complications) compared with aspirin 300 to 325 mg 3 times daily or warfarin, in addition to a similar antiplatelet effect, suggests indobufen can be considered a drug with a definite role in the management of atherothrombotic events. In particular, indobufen may be an effective alternative for at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or who are at higher risk of bleeding.     

Oral antiplatelet therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention

The benefit of oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intracoronary stent implantation is well established. Combined aspirin with clopidogrel or ticlopidine therapy is superior to aspirin alone in reducing thrombotic events after stent placement. Clopidogrel is the drug of choice, given that its efficacy is comparable to ticlopidine and it has a superior safety profile. Despite dual antiplatelet therapy, patients remain at risk of recurrent vascular events. Optimal timing, duration and dosage of antiplatelet therapy remain controversial. Recent evidence suggests additional benefit with clopidogrel pretreatment, high clopidogrel loading dose and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy post-PCI in high-risk patients.     

Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiplatelet agents used in the secondary prevention of stroke

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and debilitation. Several million stroke survivors are alive throughout the world today. Prevention of recurrent stroke is of major importance to stroke survivors. Several pharmacological agents are currently available for use in secondary stroke prevention.Clopidogrel, the combination of immediate-release aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole and aspirin alone are the most widely recommended agents for use in the secondary prevention of strokes. Clopidogrel has shown superiority over aspirin in the combined endpoints of stroke, death and myocardial infarction. The immediate-release aspirin/extended-release dipyridamole combination has shown superiority to aspirin alone in the secondary prevention of stroke.Dipyridamole has been studied as an antiplatelet agent for several decades. Early trials to prove its efficacy compared with aspirin were not favourable, and patients often experienced many adverse effects. Researchers began developing an extended-release formulation in an effort to maintain therapeutic blood concentrations with less frequent daily administration and better adverse effect profile. Pharmacokinetic analysis of this new product showed it to have a more consistent and reproducible absorption compared with immediate-release dipyridamole. The rate of absorption of extended-release dipyridamole is considerably slower than that of immediate-release dipyridamole, while similar plasma concentrations are maintained to optimise antiplatelet efficacy. This allows extended-release dipyridamole to be administered twice daily rather than four times daily.A large-scale randomised trial was conducted with extended-release dipyridamole 200mg in combination with immediate-release aspirin 25mg given twice daily. The combination product showed a greater efficacy at preventing a recurring stroke then either agent administered alone. Indirect comparisons with clopidogrel show that the combination of immediate-release aspirin/extended-release dipyridamole may be more effective than clopidogrel at preventing a recurring stroke.     

Effects of a new anti-inflammatory imidazole derivative, fenflumizole, on platelet aggregation in the rabbit

The antiplatelet effect of fenflumizole, compared with aspirin or ticlopidine, was examined in in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo situations of the rabbit. Unlike ticlopidine, fenflumizole and aspirin effectively inhibited in vitro the platelet aggregation elicited by arachidonate and collagen. The activity of fenflumizole was 350 times more potent than that of aspirin. Fenflumizole (0.3-3 mg/kg) given p.o. was 4.2 and 8.1 times more potent than aspirin in inhibiting arachidonate- and collagen-induced platelet aggregations, respectively. Ticlopidine (300 mg/kg, p.o.) resulted in only weak effects on the aggregations. Fenflumizole (3 mg/kg) as well as aspirin (10 mg/kg) given p.o., unlike ticlopidine (300 mg/kg), effectively prevented the arachidonate-induced sudden death.     

Analgesic effect of graded doses of flurbiprofen in post-episiotomy pain

Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of flurbiprofen 25, 50 and 100 mg, aspirin 600 mg, and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe post-episiotomy pain. One hundred and fifty-two evaluable patients completed a randomized, double-blind, stratified, parallel groups study. They were observed over a six hour period by one nurse-observer. Based upon each of the summary efficacy measures SPID, TOTAL and PEAK % and most of the hourly direct measures of pain intensity and pain relief, each of the four active treatments were statistically superior to placebo. Flurbiprofen 25 mg appeared to be slightly less effective than aspirin 600 mg, but the differences were not statistically significant. Flurbiprofen 50 and 100 mg were quite similar and were significantly more effective than aspirin 600 mg and flurbiprofen 25 mg. There were no observed or reported adverse effects.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.