18F-FET PET compared with 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Recent studies suggest a somewhat selective uptake of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in cerebral gliomas and in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and a good distinction between tumor and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 18F-FET PET in patients with SCC of the head and neck region by comparing that tracer with 18F-FDG PET and CT. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with suspected head and neck tumors underwent 18F-FET PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT within 1 wk before operation. After coregistration, the images were evaluated by 3 independent observers and an ROC analysis was performed, with the histopathologic result used as a reference. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in the lesions were determined. RESULTS: In 18 of 21 patients, histologic examination revealed SCC, and in 2 of these patients, a second SCC tumor was found at a different anatomic site. In 3 of 21 patients, inflammatory tissue and no tumor were identified. Eighteen of 20 SCC tumors were positive for both 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FET uptake, one 0.3-cm SCC tumor was detected neither with 18F-FDG PET nor with 18F-FET PET, and one 0.7-cm SCC tumor in a 4.3-cm ulcer was overestimated as a 4-cm tumor on 18F-FDG PET and missed on 18F-FET PET. Inflammatory tissue was positive for 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 3.7-4.7) but negative for 18F-FET uptake (SUV, 1.3-1.6). The SUVs of 18F-FDG in SCC were significantly higher (13.0 +/- 9.3) than those of 18F-FET (4.4 +/- 2.2). The ROC analysis showed significantly superior detection of SCC with (18)F-FET PET or 18F-FDG PET than with CT. No significant difference (P = 0.71) was found between 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET was 93%, specificity was 79%, and accuracy was 83%. 18F-FET PET yielded a lower sensitivity of 75% but a substantially higher specificity of 95% (accuracy, 90%). CONCLUSION: 18F-FET may not replace 18F-FDG in the PET diagnostics of head and neck cancer but may be a helpful additional tool in selected patients, because 18F-FET PET might better differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue. The sensitivity of 18F-FET PET in SCC, however, was inferior to that of 18F-FDG PET because of lower SUVs.     

Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of simultaneous ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT as well as their single components in head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

In a prospective study 17 patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging or follow-up and an additional ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI scan with whole-body imaging and dedicated examination of the neck. MRI, CT and PET images as well as PET/MRI and PET/CT examinations were evaluated independently and in a blinded fashion by two reader groups. Results were compared with the reference standard (final diagnosis determined in consensus using all available data including histology and follow-up). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

A total of 23 malignant tumours were found with the reference standard. PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 82.7 %, a specificity of 87.3 %, a PPV of 73.2 % and a NPV of 92.4 %. Corresponding values for PET/MRI were 80.5, 88.2, 75.6 and 92.5 %. No statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability could be found between PET/CT and PET/MRI. Evaluation of the PET part from PET/CT revealed highest sensitivity of 95.7 %, and MRI showed best specificity of 96.4 %. There was a high inter-rater agreement in all modalities (Cohen’s kappa 0.61–0.82).

Conclusion

PET/MRI of patients with head and neck cancer yielded good diagnostic capability, similar to PET/CT. Further studies on larger cohorts to prove these first results seem justified.     

Predictive value of pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT for the outcome of 18F-FDG PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of pre-therapy fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake parameters of primary tumour in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on FDG-positive volume—positron emission tomography (PET) gross tumour volume (PET-GTV).

Methods

This retrospective study included 19 patients (15 men and 4 women, mean age 59.2 years, range 23–81 years) diagnosed with HNC between 2005 and 2011. Of 19 patients, 15 (79 %) had stage III–IV. All patients underwent FDG PET/CT before treatment. Metabolic indexes of primary tumour, including metabolic tumour volume (MTV), maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV_max, SUV_mean) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were considered. Partial volume effect correction (PVC) was performed for SUV_mean and TLG estimation. Correlations between PET/CT parameters and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed. Median patient follow-up was 19.2 months (range 4–24 months).

Results

MTV, TLG and PVC-TLG predicting patients’ outcome with respect to all the considered local and distant disease control endpoints (LRFS, DMFS and DFS) were 32.4 cc, 469.8 g and 547.3 g, respectively. SUV_mean and PVC-SUV_mean cut-off values predictive of LRFS and DFS were 10.8 and 13.3, respectively. PVC was able to compensate errors up to 25 % in the primary HNC tumour uptake. Moreover, PVC enhanced the statistical significance of the results.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT uptake parameters are predictors of patients’ outcome and can potentially identify patients with higher risk of treatment failure that could benefit from more aggressive approaches. Application of PVC is recommended for accurate measurement of PET parameters.     

RGD-K5 PET/CT in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: Results from a pilot study

Background/Aim

We prospectively investigated the potential usefulness of PET using a new tracer targeting integrin αvβ3 (termed RGD-K5) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Patients and Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced HNC scheduled for definitive CCRT were eligible. RDG-K5 PET and FDG PET scans were performed at three different time points (baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-treatment).

Results

Nine patients completed all of the three scans, whereas two patients withdrew after two scans only. Uptake of both RGD-K5 and FDG generally decreased following CCRT. However, the observed decrease did not differ significantly between complete responders and non-responders. At 3 months post-treatment, the uptake of both RGD-K5 and FDG at the main tumors was significantly lower in those who achieved complete responses than in those with residual tumors.

Conclusion

RGD-K5 PET has the potential to identify patients with incomplete responses to CCRT.

     

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing the response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an accepted treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) that improves surgical outcomes. If a pathological complete response is achieved, conservative surgery can be considered. The objective of our study was to assess the reliability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for evaluating the response to neoadjuvant RCT in LARC.

Methods

We prospectively studied 41 patients diagnosed with LARC and candidates for neoadjuvant RCT. PET/CT was performed before RCT and again 7?weeks later. A visual and semiquantitative analysis was carried out. The pathological response was classified according to the Mandard tumour regression grade (TRG). We analysed: (a) the relationship between TRG and the result of the posttreatment PET/CT scan, and (b) the correlation between the percentage of pathological response and the percentage decrease in SUVmax according to the response index (RI).

Results

The mean SUVmax of the rectal lesions at diagnosis was 13.6 and after RCT 3.96. The mean RI was 65.32?%. Sensitivity was 88.88?%, specificity 92.86?%, positive predictive value 96?%, negative predictive value 81?%. Of the 41 patients, 8 had TRG I (all negative PET/CT); 6 had TRG II (5 negative, 1 positive PET/CT); 16 had TRG III (13 positive, 3 negative PET/CT); 9 had TRG IV (all positive PET/CT); 2 had TRG V (all positive PET/CT). Of the 14 patients classified as responders (TRG I, II), 13 (92.86?%) had negative PET/CT. Of the 27 patients classified as nonresponders (TRG III?CV), 24 (88.88?%) had positive PET/CT. Differences were statistically significant (p?<?0.0001). The RI in responders was 79.9?% and in nonresponders was 60.3?%. Differences were statistically significant (p?<?0.037).

Conclusion

PET/CT is a reliable technique for assessing response to neoadjuvant RCT in LARC, with a view to considering more conservative surgical treatment. The combination of the visual and semiquantitative analysis increases the diagnostic validity of PET/CT.     

18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.

The value of PET or PET/CT with (18)F-FDG for the staging of penile cancer has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to investigate the pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake in the primary malignancy and its metastases and to determine the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and restaging of penile cancer. METHODS: Thirteen patients (mean +/- SD age, 64 +/- 14.0 y) with suspected penile cancer or suspected recurrent disease were examined with a Gemini PET/CT system (200 MBq of (18)F-FDG). The reference standard was based on histopathologic findings obtained at biopsy or during surgery. RESULTS: Both the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases exhibited a pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake typical for malignancy. Sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions was 75% (6/8), and specificity was 75% (3/4). On a per-patient basis, sensitivity in the detection of lymph node metastases was 80% (4/5), and specificity was 100% (8/8). On a nodal-group basis, PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 89% (8/9) in the detection of metastases in the superficial inguinal lymph node basins and a sensitivity of 100% (7/7) in the deep inguinal and obturator lymph node basins. The mean +/- SD maximum standardized uptake value for the 8 primary lesions was 5.3 +/- 3.7, and that for the 16 lymph node metastases was 4.6 +/- 2.0. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the main indication for (18)F-FDG PET in the primary staging or follow-up of penile cancer patients may be the prognostically crucial search for lymph node metastases. With the use of a PET/CT unit, the additional information provided by CT may be especially useful for planning surgery. Implementing (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in future staging algorithms may lead to a more precise and stage-appropriate therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, invasive procedures with a high morbidity rate, such as general bilateral lymphadenectomy, may be avoided.     

18F-FDG versus 11C-choline PET/CT for the imaging of advanced head and neck cancer after combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy: the time period during which PET/CT can reliably detect non-recurrence

Purpose  

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for detecting recurrences of advanced head and neck cancer after combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Additionally, we surveyed the time period during which an effective negative predictive value could be maintained after the first follow-up PET/CT examination and estimated the optimal timing of a second PET/CT examination for detecting late recurrences.     

Evaluation of liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation: utility of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the CT appearance of liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation and to describe the imaging findings of and utility of (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in assessing tumor recurrence after ablation. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT can provide added diagnostic information compared with conventional imaging in patients after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases and can be useful in guiding repeat ablation procedures.     

Assessment of clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck cancer: a probability analysis

The purpose of this study was to calculate disease probabilities based on data of patients with head and neck cancer in the register of our institution and to perform a systematic review of the available data on the accuracy of PET in the primary assessment and follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer. The pre-test probability of head and neck cancer among patients in our institutional data registry was assessed. Then the published literature was selected and appraised according to a standard protocol of systematic reviews. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data on study characteristics, quality and accuracy. Accuracy data were used to form 2 x 2 contingency tables and were pooled to produce summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and summary likelihood ratios for positive and negative testing. Finally post-test probabilities were calculated on the basis of the pre-test probabilities of this patient group. All patients had cytologically or histologically proven cancer. The prevalence of additional lymph node metastases on PET in staging examinations was 19.6% (11/56), and that of locoregional recurrence on restaging PET was 28.6% (12/42). In the primary assessment of patients, PET had positive and negative likelihood ratios of 3.9 (2.56-5.93) and 0.24 (0.14-0.41), respectively. Disease probabilities were therefore 49.4% for a positive test result and 5.7% for a negative test result. In the assessment of recurrence these values were 3.96 (2.8-5.6) and 0.16 (0.1-0.25), resulting in probabilities of 49.7% and 3.8%. PET evaluation for involvement of lymph nodes had positive and negative likelihood ratios of 17.26 (10.9-27.3) and 0.19 (0.13-0.27) for primary assessment and 11.0 (2.93-41.24) and 0.14 (0.01-1.88) for detection of recurrence. The probabilities were 81.2% and 4.5% for primary assessment and 73.3% and 3.4% for assessment of recurrence. It is concluded that in this clinical setting the main advantage of PET is the ability to reliably rule out the presence of disease in both staging and restaging. Further research is required to derive probabilities for individual patients from sequential testing as applied in the diagnostic work-up of patients with head and neck cancer.     

18F-FDG PET/CT delayed images after diuretic for restaging invasive bladder cancer.

PET with (18)F-FDG has been considered of limited value for detection of bladder cancer because of the urinary excretion of the tracer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of PET/CT in the detection and restaging of bladder cancer using furosemide and oral hydration to remove the excreted (18)F-FDG from the bladder. METHODS: Seventeen patients with bladder cancer (11 without cystectomy, 6 with total cystectomy and urinary diversion) underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT from head to the upper thighs 60 min after the intravenous injection of 370 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Additional pelvic images were acquired 1 h after the intravenous injection of furosemide and oral hydration. PET/CT findings were confirmed by MRI, cystoscopy, or biopsy. RESULTS: PET/CT was able to detect bladder lesions in 6 of 11 patients who had not undergone cystectomy. These images changed the PET/CT final reading in 7 patients: Recurrent bladder lesions were detected in 6 patients, pelvic lymph node metastases in 2 patients, and prostate metastasis in 1. This technique overcame the difficulties posed by the urinary excretion of (18)F-FDG. Hypermetabolic lesions could be easily detected by PET and precisely localized in the bladder wall, pelvic lymph nodes, or prostate by CT. Seven of 17 patients (41%) were upstaged only after delayed pelvic images. CONCLUSION: Detection of locally recurrent or residual bladder tumors can be dramatically improved using (18)F-FDG PET/CT with delayed images after a diuretic and oral hydration.     

Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: 18F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT

Purpose

Our objectives were to assess the quality of PET images and coregistered anatomic images obtained with PET/MR, to evaluate the detection of focal uptake and SUV, and to compare these findings with those of PET/CT in patients with head and neck tumours.

Methods

The study group comprised 32 consecutive patients with malignant head and neck tumours who underwent whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT. PET images were reconstructed using the attenuation correction sequence for PET/MR and CT for PET/CT. Two experienced observers evaluated the anonymized data. They evaluated image and fusion quality, lesion conspicuity, anatomic location, number and size of categorized (benign versus assumed malignant) lesions with focal uptake. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed to determine SUVs of lesions and organs for both modalities. Statistical analysis considered data clustering due to multiple lesions per patient.

Results

PET/MR coregistration and image fusion was feasible in all patients. The analysis included 66 malignant lesions (tumours, metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases), 136 benign lesions and 470 organ ROIs. There was no statistically significant difference between PET/MR and PET/CT regarding rating scores for image quality, fusion quality, lesion conspicuity or anatomic location, number of detected lesions and number of patients with and without malignant lesions. A high correlation was observed for SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR and PET/CT for malignant lesions, benign lesions and organs (ρ?=?0.787 to 0.877, p?<?0.001). SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR were significantly lower than on PET/CT for malignant tumours, metastatic neck nodes, benign lesions, bone marrow, and liver (p?<?0.05). The main factor affecting the difference between SUVs in malignant lesions was tumour size (p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with head and neck tumours, PET/MR showed equivalent performance to PET/CT in terms of qualitative results. Comparison of SUVs revealed an excellent correlation for measurements on both modalities, but underestimation of SUVs measured on PET/MR as compared to PET/CT.     

18F-FDG PET/CT在不明原发灶肿瘤中的临床应用价值

目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT全身显像在不明原发灶肿瘤（CUP）诊断中的临床应用价值。方法回顾分析46例于2015年2月至2016年6月在我院行常规检查未能发现肿瘤原发灶而进一步行18F-FDG PET/CT全身显像查找肿瘤原发灶的转移性肿瘤患者的资料。PET/CT图像分析采用视觉及半定量分析方法。通过病理活检和（或）临床综合诊断、临床随访对结果进行评价。结果46例患者中,18F-FDG PET/CT显像找到原发肿瘤33例,均经过病理活检及临床随访证实;13例未发现原发病灶。18F-FDG PET/CT对不明肿瘤原发灶的检出率为71.7%（33/46）,其中阳性患者中淋巴瘤3例、胃癌2例、食管癌4例、卵巢癌3例、肺癌14例、肝癌2例、尿路上皮癌1例、鼻咽癌2例、多发性骨髓瘤1例、降结肠癌1例。转移方式主要有淋巴结转移32例、骨转移20例、肝转移13例、肺转移9例、胸膜腹膜转移5例、肾上腺转移3例、脑转移4例、皮下转移3例、心包膜转移1例。结论18F-FDG PET/CT全身显像对CUP的检出率显著优于一般常规检查,对临床指导治疗有着重要意义。     

Complementary roles of 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in medullary thyroid cancer

Serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are markers of recurrent or persistent disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). However, conventional imaging often fails to localize metastatic disease. Our aim was to compare fluorine-labeled dihydroxyphenylalanine ((18)F-DOPA) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT with multidetector CT (MDCT) and MRI in recurrent or persistent MTC. METHODS: Nineteen MTC patients with increased calcitonin or CEA on follow-up (mean ± SD, 93 ± 91 mo; range, 4-300 mo) after primary therapy were prospectively imaged with 4 techniques: (18)F-DOPA PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MDCT, and MRI. Images were analyzed for pathologic lesions, which were surgically removed when possible. The correlation between the detection rate for each method and the calcitonin and CEA concentrations and histopathologic findings was investigated. Results: On the basis of histology and follow-up, one or more imaging methods accurately localized metastatic disease in 12 (63%) of 19 patients. The corresponding figures for (18)F-DOPA PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MDCT, and MRI were 11 (58%) of 19, 10 (53%) of 19, 9 (47%) of 19, and 10 (59%) of 17, respectively. Calcitonin and CEA correlated with (18)F-DOPA PET/CT (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.0263, respectively) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings (both P < 0.0001). In patients with an unstable calcitonin doubling time (n = 8), (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG PET/CT were equally sensitive. In contrast, for patients with an unstable CEA doubling time (n = 4), (18)F-FDG PET/CT was more accurate. CONCLUSION: For most MTC patients with occult disease, (18)F-DOPA PET/CT accurately detects metastases. In patients with an unstable calcitonin level, (18)F-DOPA PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT are complementary. For patients with an unstable CEA doubling time, (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be more feasible. MRI is sensitive but has the highest rate of false-positive results.     

Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR

Objective:

To investigate reproducibility of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR scans in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods:

30 patients with HNSCC were included in this prospective study. The patients were scanned twice before radiotherapy treatment with both PET/CT and PET/MR. Patients were scanned on the same scanners, 3 days apart and according to the same protocol. Metabolic tumour activity was measured by the maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV_max and SUV_peak, respectively), and total lesion glycolysis from the metabolic tumour volume defined from ≥50% SUV_max. Bland–Altman analysis with limits of agreement, coefficient of variation (CV) from the two modalities were performed in order to test the reproducibility. Furthermore, CVs from SUV_max and SUV_peak were compared. The area under the curve from cumulative SUV–volume histograms were measured and tested for reproducibility of the distribution of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake.

Results:

24 patients had two pre-treatment PET/CT scans and 21 patients had two pre-treatment PET/MR scans available for further analyses. Mean difference for SUV_max, peak and mean was approximately 4% for PET/CT and 3% for PET/MR, with 95% limits of agreement less than ±20%. CV was small (5–7%) for both modalities. There was no significant difference in CVs between PET/CT and PET/MR (p = 0.31). SUV_max was not more reproducible than SUV_peak (p = 0.09).

Conclusion:

¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PET/CT and PET/MR is highly reproducible and we found no difference in reproducibility between PET/CT and PET/MR.

Advances in knowledge:

This is the first report to test reproducibility of PET/CT and PET/MR.Functional imaging with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has been shown to be useful for prognostication of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC),^1–3 and the use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has also been shown to reduce interobserver variability in target delineation for radiotherapy.^4,5 Furthermore, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can identify regions of the tumour with a high risk of relapse, leading to the idea that ¹⁸F-FDG uptake might be a target for dose painting.^6,7 Finally, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may be used in response evaluation.^8,9 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) has for many years been the main uptake measurement in prognostic studies for various malignancies. More recent studies have focused on demonstrating prognostic value of PET/CT-based volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV is the sum of the volume of voxels with standard uptake value (SUV) exceeding a certain threshold value in a tumour, and TLG is calculated by multiplying MTV and the mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean) of the MTV. These volume-based PET parameters have increasingly gained interest and have been reported to be significant prognostic factors for various malignancies including HNSCC.^{10–13 18}F-FDG PET/CT is currently not routinely recommended as a diagnostic tool in HNSCC except in very specific situations,¹⁴ but reproducibility of the ¹⁸F-FDG signal is a prerequisite for a more widespread use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for the above-mentioned indications. Yet, only a few studies of the reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT exist^8,15–21 and none of these studies includes patients with HNSCC.MRI is gaining acceptance as an imaging modality for oncology as it offers superior soft-tissue contrast compared with CT alone, and it has been suggested that information from PET/CT and MR is complementary in head and neck cancer.²² The introduction of the integrated PET/MR scanner offers a unique opportunity to combine the high soft-tissue contrast of MR with the functional imaging from PET within a single imaging session. PET/MR is still in its infancy, but the combined modality imaging is potentially useful in the management of patients with HNSCC.^22–28 However, the same criteria of reproducibility as with PET/CT should be upheld by this new modality. The purpose of this prospective test–retest study is to assess the reproducibility of both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR in a homogenous cohort of patients with HNSCC.     

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pre and post treatment evaluation in head and neck carcinoma

Head and neck cancer (HNC) ranks as the 6^th most common cancer worldwide, with the vast majority being head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The majority of patients present with complicated locally advanced disease (typically stage III and IV) requiring multidisciplinary treatment plans with combinations of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Tumor staging is critical to decide therapeutic planning. Multiple challenges include accurate tumor localization with precise delineation of tumor volume, cervical lymph node staging, detection of distant metastasis as well as ruling out synchronous second primary tumors. Some patients present with cervical lymph node metastasis without obvious primary tumors on clinical examination or conventional cross sectional imaging. Treatment planning includes surgery, radiation, chemotherapy or combinations that could significantly alter the anatomy and physiology of this complex head and neck region, making assessment of treatment response and detection of residual/ recurrent tumor very difficult by clinical evaluation and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/CT (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has been widely used to assess HNC for more than a decade with high diagnostic accuracy especially in detection of initial distant metastasis and evaluation of treatment response. There are some limitations that are unique to PET/CT including artifacts, lower soft tissue contrast and resolution as compared to MRI, false positivity in post-treatment phase due to inflammation and granulation tissues, etc. The aim of this article is to review the roles of PET/CT in both pre and post treatment management of HNSCC including its limitations that radiologists must know. Accurate PET/CT interpretation is the crucial initial step that leads to appropriate tumor staging and treatment planning.     

^18F-FDG PET/CT对可疑复发性宫颈癌的临床价值

目的 探讨^18F-FDG PET/CT在可疑复发性宫颈癌临床诊疗中的价值.方法 回顾性分析51例宫颈癌根治后随访期间临床可疑复发的患者,记录患者的治疗资料、可疑复发表现、18F-FDG PET/CT显像结果、同期常规影像检查结果、病理及临床随访结果、PET/CT结果对临床诊疗的影响.结果 PET/CT诊断宫颈癌复发43例,最终经病理检查及临床随访证实复发性宫颈癌40例,盆腔脓肿2例,放射性肠炎1例;PET/CT未见恶性征象8例,病理检查及临床随访均未见异常.PET/CT诊断复发性宫颈癌灵敏度为100.00%（40/40）,特异性为72.73%（8/11）,准确性为94.12%（48/51）.PET/CT指导制订临床诊疗及随访计划34例,改变治疗计划7例.与其他影像检查相比,PET/CT可发现更多的病灶.结论^18F-FDG PET/CT能有效诊断复发性宫颈癌,指导临床诊疗.     

18F-FDG PET/CT对可疑复发性宫颈癌的临床价值

目的 探讨18F-FDG PET/CT在可疑复发性宫颈癌临床诊疗中的价值.方法 回顾性分析51例宫颈癌根治后随访期间临床可疑复发的患者,记录患者的治疗资料、可疑复发表现、18F-FDG PET/CT显像结果、同期常规影像检查结果、病理及临床随访结果、PET/CT结果对临床诊疗的影响.结果 PET/CT诊断宫颈癌复发43例,最终经病理检查及临床随访证实复发性宫颈癌40例,盆腔脓肿2例,放射性肠炎1例;PET/CT未见恶性征象8例,病理检查及临床随访均未见异常.PET/CT诊断复发性宫颈癌灵敏度为100.00%(40/40),特异性为72.73%(8/11),准确性为94.12%(48/51).PET/CT指导制订临床诊疗及随访计划34例,改变治疗计划7例.与其他影像检查相比,PET/CT可发现更多的病灶.结论 18F-FDG PET/CT能有效诊断复发性宫颈癌,指导临床诊疗.