Galanin decreases circulating growth hormone levels in acromegaly.

Galanin is able to elicit GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly, circulating GH levels are elevated, and GH secretory dynamics are usually abnormal. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of galanin on GH secretion in acromegalic subjects. Six acromegalic patients (four males and two females) and seven healthy adult subjects (five males and two females) underwent in randomized order: 1) iv infusion of 100 mL saline from 0-45 min, and 2) iv infusion of synthetic porcine galanin (0.5 mg in 100 mL saline) from 0-45 min. In normal subjects, peak GH levels after porcine galanin administration (8.2 +/- 1.9 micrograms/L) were significantly higher than after saline infusion (1.3 +/- 0.1 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). In acromegalic patients, GH values fell from baseline (32.5 +/- 12 micrograms/L) to a mean nadir of 24.5 +/- 12.7 micrograms/L after galanin infusion. The mean change in GH values from baseline after galanin treatment in these subjects significantly differed from that observed after saline infusion from 15-90 min. Serum PRL levels were not significantly affected by galanin in either normal or acromegalic patients. Our results give the first evidence that the same dose of galanin, acting as a GH secretagogue in normal man, is, on the contrary, able to significantly inhibit GH in acromegalic patients. The cause of this paradoxical GH fall after galanin treatment in acromegaly remains to be explained. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by GH-secreting adenomatous cells.     

Effect of galanin on growth hormone-releasing hormone-stimulated growth hormone secretion in adult patients with nonendocrine diseases on long-term daily glucocorticoid treatment.

Glucocorticoids are thought to inhibit growth hormone (GH) secretion through an enhancement of endogenous somatostatin tone. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of galanin, a neuropeptide that stimulates GH secretion, on GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion in adult patients with nonendocrine diseases who were under daily immunosuppressive glucocorticoid therapy. Six normal subjects (four men, two women) and seven steroid-treated subjects (three men, four women) were studied. GHRH-induced GH secretion was evaluated during a 40-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion of saline or porcine galanin (12.5 micrograms/min). During saline infusion, steroid-treated patients showed a blunted GH response to GHRH (GH peak, 8.1 +/- 2.8 micrograms/L), as compared with normal subjects (GH peak, 23.8 +/- 3.9 micrograms/L). During galanin infusion, the GH response to GHRH was significantly enhanced (GH peak, 46.6 +/- 9.4 micrograms/L, P less than .05), as compared with saline infusion in normal subjects. In contrast, galanin infusion did not enhance the GH response to GHRH (GH peak, 16.6 +/- 6.5 micrograms/L), as compared with saline infusion in steroid-treated patients. The area under the GH-response curves was also significantly (P less than .05) lower in steroid-treated subjects, as compared with normal subjects. Thus, galanin failed to normalize or enhance the GH response to GHRH in patients treated long-term with glucocorticoids. It can be hypothesized that galanin does not elicit GH secretion by decreasing hypothalamic somatostatin tone.     

Galanin does not affect the growth hormone-releasing hormone-stimulated growth hormone secretion in patients with hyperthyroidism.

Patients with hyperthyroidism have reduced spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of galanin, a novel neuropeptide which stimulates GH secretion in man, on the GH response to GHRH in patients with hyperthyroidism. Eight untreated hyperthyroid patients with Graves' disease (6F, 2M, aged 25-50 years) and six healthy volunteers (3F, 3M, aged 27-76 years) underwent from -10 to 30 min in random order: (i) porcine galanin, iv, 500 micrograms in 100 ml saline; or (ii) saline, iv, 100 ml. A bolus of human GHRH(1-29)NH2, 100 micrograms, was injected iv at 0 min. Hyperthyroid patients showed blunted GH peaks after GHRH+saline (10.2 +/- 2.5 micrograms/l) compared to normal subjects (20.7 +/- 4.8 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). GH peaks after GHRH+galanin were also significantly lower in hyperthyroid subjects (12.5 +/- 3 micrograms/l) compared to normal subjects (43.8 +/- 6 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). That galanin is not able to reverse the blunted GH response to GHRH in hyperthyroidism suggests that hyperthyroxinemia may either increase the somatostatin release by the hypothalamus or directly affect the pituitary GH secretory capacity.     

Galanin reinstates the growth hormone response to repeated growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in man

OBJECTIVE--To clarify the mechanism by which galanin, a 29-amino-acid peptide, increases GH secretion in man. DESIGN--We studied the GH-releasing effect of this neurohormone (galanin, 15 micrograms/kg) infused over 60 minutes after 120 minutes of saline, following a previous GHRH bolus (GHRH 1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes) and coadministered with the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses (GHRH every 120 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes). PATIENTS--Fourteen healthy male subjects, aged 20-34 years, in two groups (group A, 20-31 years (n = 8); group B, 25-34 years (n = 6)) were studied. MEASUREMENT--Blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes of 255 minutes. Serum GH was measured in duplicate by IRMA. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out by non-parametric ANOVA test. RESULTS--The GH response to galanin infused 120 minutes after saline overlapped with that induced by the neuropeptide infused following previous GHRH bolus (AUC, mean +/- SEM: 317.3 +/- 73.2 vs 326.8 +/- 54.2 micrograms/l/h). The GH-releasing effect of the second GHRH bolus (126.9 +/- 32.3 micrograms/l/h) was lower than that of the first one (503.4 +/- 41.3 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002). Galanin markedly enhanced the GH responses to the second GHRH bolus (1118.0 +/- 212.7 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002 vs second GHRH bolus alone) so that it did not significantly differ from the first one (710.9 +/- 107.8 micrograms/l/h). CONCLUSIONS--Our results show that the GH-releasing effect of galanin is not modified by GHRH pretreatment and that the neuropeptide reinstates the GH response to the repeated GHRH stimulation in man. They suggest that these effects are due to the inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release.     

Pulsatile growth hormone secretion in patients with acromegaly and normal men: the effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone infusion

Twenty-four GH secretory patterns were studied before and during continuous infusions of GHRH in six patients with active acromegaly and in six normal adult men. GH release was episodic in both groups. Control subjects showed a normal diurnal variation in GH release, with the majority of GH released at night (2200-0800 h); mean levels were 1.5 +/- 0.4 (SE) ng/mL (day) and 4.2 +/- 0.8 ng/mL (night). Acromegalics had no diurnal variation in GH; levels were 45.3 +/- 13.7 ng/mL (day) and 39.8 +/- 12.2 ng/mL (night). Acromegalics demonstrated an increased frequency of GH pulses compared to normals (11.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.3/24 h). During continuous 24-h infusions of GHRH, the normal subjects continued to show a diurnal variation in GH release, but GH pulse frequency increased to a rate (11.7 +/- 1.4 pulses/24 h) very similar to that of the patients with acromegaly. In contrast, GHRH infusion did not alter the GH pulse frequency in the acromegalics. GHRH increased the mean levels of GH in both groups (patients 80.2 +/- 20.3 vs. 41.0 +/- 12.1 ng/mL, x +/- SE. P less than 0.05; controls 10.2 +/- 2.0 vs. 3.33 +/- 0.5 ng/mL, P less than 0.01). Some of the patients with acromegaly showed a progressive decline in GH levels during the infusion period, suggesting desensitization or exhaustion of releaseable stores; however, GH levels remained above basal values in all patients. After the 24-h GHRH infusions, the GH response to a bolus of GHRH was diminished in the normal subjects (2.1 +/- 0.9 vs. 16.8 +/- 5 ng/mL, x +/- SE; P less than 0.01) but not in the acromegalic patients (30.2 +/- 8.9 vs. 35.5 +/- 12.5 ng/mL; NS). These results indicate that GH release is episodic under basal conditions and during continuous GHRH infusion in both acromegalic and normal subjects, indicating the importance of other modulators of GH release, such as somatostatin, which may remain pulsatile even in acromegaly.     

Growth hormone-releasing hormone infusion in patients with active acromegaly

To determine GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in patients with active acromegaly, nine patients received a 50-microgram GHRH-(1-44) bolus dose followed by a 2-h infusion with 100 micrograms GHRH/h, after which a second 50-microgram GHRH bolus dose was given. Serum GH, PRL, and immunoreactive GHRH levels were measured from 2 h before to 1 h after the end of the infusion and compared with hormone levels in six normal subjects subjected to the same protocol. In addition, seven of the nine acromegalic patients received 100 micrograms GHRH as an iv bolus dose, followed by a 2-h saline infusion on a different day. After the 100-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, the mean GH level increased from 55.9 +/- 18.0 (+/- SE) to 148.5 +/- 40.0 ng/ml within 15 min. Thereafter, GH levels decreased and were significantly lower at 90 and 120 min compared to the peak level 15 min after GHRH injection. After the 50-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, all acromegalic patients except two also had a clear-cut rise of GH levels, with the mean GH level increasing from 37.5 +/- 13.2 to 108.4 +/- 55.0 ng/ml at 60 min. Thereafter, elevated GH levels were sustained in the acromegalic patients throughout the GHRH infusion. In contrast, normal subjects had a significant decrease in the initially elevated GH levels, despite continuous GHRH infusion. There were no significant differences between PRL secretion and immunoreactive GHRH levels in either group. These findings suggest that patients with active acromegaly not only have elevated basal GH levels, but also have a greater ready releasable GH pool and/or accelerated GH turnover compared to those of normal subjects, which cannot be exhausted by a 2-h GHRH infusion.     

Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin responses to repetitive administration of GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly

We investigated the pattern of GH secretion in response to repetitive GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) administration in patients with active acromegaly and in normal subjects. Twelve acromegalic patients (nine women and 3 men; aged 21-76 yr) were studied. Eight had never been treated, whereas four had undergone neurosurgery but still had active disease. All patients and eight normal subjects received three doses of 50 micrograms GHRH, iv, at 2-h intervals. Seven patients were retested 6-8 weeks after transsphenoidal removal of a pituitary adenoma. There was a marked serum GH rise in acromegalic patients and normal subjects after the first GHRH dose [area under the curve, 2070 +/- 532 (+/- SE) vs. 1558 +/- 612 ng/min X ml, respectively; P = NS]. Successive GHRH doses stimulated GH release only in acromegalic patients (second dose, 1123 +/- 421 ng/min X ml; third dose, 2293 +/- 1049 ng/min X ml). In normal subjects, the GH response to the second and third GHRH doses was blunted (second dose, 86 +/- 32 ng/min X ml; third dose, 210 +/- 63 ng/min X ml; P less than 0.01). PRL secretion did not change in normal subjects, whereas 6 of 12 acromegalic patients had PRL release after each GHRH dose (PRL responders to GHRH). Transsphenoidal surgery led to normalization (less than 5 ng/ml) of the preoperatively elevated GH levels in all but 2 patients, who, however, had reduction of somatomedin-C levels. The amount of GH released in the postoperative test was significantly lower than that released preoperatively (first dose, 722 +/- 209 vs. 2945 +/- 743 ng/min X ml; second dose, 358 +/- 117 vs. 1737 +/- 633 ng/min X ml; third dose, 320 +/- 144 vs. 1776 +/- 676 ng/min X ml, respectively; P less than 0.05 in all instances). Thus, patients with active acromegaly, but not normal subjects, respond to repetitive GHRH administration at 2-h intervals with an increase in GH levels. This increase may be due to a larger releasable GH pool and/or faster GH turnover in the adenomatous cell.     

Comparison of the sensitivity of growth hormone secretion to somatostatin in vivo and in vitro in acromegaly

Somatostatin (SRIH) sensitivity in acromegaly was evaluated in vivo by comparing the inhibition of GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv)-stimulated GH secretion in eight acromegalic and six normal subjects. A SRIH infusion (50 micrograms/h) that inhibited the mean plasma GH response to GHRH by 74 +/- 5% (+/- SE) in normal subjects had no significant effect in the acromegalic patients. However, when two acromegalic patients in whom SRIH had no suppressive effect were excluded from the analysis, the effect of SRIH in the other six (82 +/- 7%) was comparable to that in the normal subjects. Within the acromegalic group, the percent suppression of basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion was inversely correlated with both basal plasma GH (r = -0.751; P = 0.03 and r = -0.727; P = 0.04, respectively) and insulin-like growth factor I (r = -0.800; P = 0.02 and r = -0.727; P = 0.04, respectively) concentrations. The in vitro sensitivity to SRIH was studied in pituitary adenomas from five of the acromegalic patients in 3- to 4-day monolayer cultures of dispersed cells. The SRIH IC50 values were lowest in the tumors (8.6-44 pmol/L) from the three patients who had in vivo SRIH sensitivity (suppression of GHRH-stimulated GH secretion) comparable to that in the normal subjects. The IC50 values were higher in the tumors (150 and 21,000 pmol/L) from the two patients that were least responsive to SRIH in vivo. These results indicate that there is considerable variability of SRIH sensitivity in patients with acromegaly. Although the role of this defect in the pathogenesis of acromegaly is uncertain, it may be an important determinant in the degree of elevation of plasma GH levels.     

Increased growth hormone pulse frequency in acromegaly

To investigate whether GH secretion in acromegaly is subject to regulatory control by the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) we studied GH secretion in 22 patients with acromegaly. Parameters of pulsatile GH secretion were assessed using frequent blood sampling (every 20 or 10 min for 24 h). Acute GH responses to GHRH-44 (0.1, 0.33, and 1.0 micrograms/kg BW, iv) were measured, and GH secretion during therapy with the long-acting somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 (Sandoz) was assessed. The results were compared to those in normal volunteers. Spontaneous GH pulse frequency was greater in patients with acromegaly than in 6 control subjects (8.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.1 pulses/24 h), as estimated by the 20-min sampling frequency. The 10-min sampling frequency revealed 12.9 +/- 0.7 pulses/24 h in acromegalics. Spontaneous GH pulse amplitude and acute GH rises in response to GHRH did not differ between control and acromegalic subjects. A similar degree of nocturnal augmentation of GH secretion was observed in both groups, and it persisted during SMS 201-995 therapy in patients with acromegaly. These observations suggest that GH secretion in acromegaly remains under stimulatory control by GHRH, which may be released at an abnormally high rate.     

Effects of theophylline infusion on the growth hormone (GH) and prolactin response to GH-releasing hormone administration in acromegaly

Since theophylline has been shown to blunt the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in normal subjects, we investigated whether the same effect of theophylline administration could be reproduced in patients with active acromegaly. Ten acromegalic patients received on two different days 100 micrograms GHRH iv alone and the same GHRH dose during a constant infusion of theophylline (3.56 mg/min), beginning 2 h before GHRH administration. In the whole group theophylline did not affect basal GH secretion significantly (from a mean of 44.6 +/- 14.4 at 0 min to 41.8 +/- 13.5 ng/ml at 120 min). However, the amount of GH released after GHRH stimulation was lower when theophylline was concomitantly infused (7525 +/- 3709 ng min/ml vs. 12038 +/- 6337 ng min/ml; p less than 0.05). The inhibitory effect of theophylline was not homogeneous, since either marked or minimal reductions of the GHRH-stimulated GH secretion occurred. Serum PRL levels increased after GHRH administration in 6 patients and theophylline infusion had no influence upon this response. Peak GHRH levels were not different in both studies (14.9 +/- 1.7 and 17.1 +/- 4.0 ng/ml, respectively). Free fatty acid levels rose progressively during theophylline administration (from 0.66 +/- 0.10 at 0 min to 1.04 +/- 0.10 mEq/l at 240 min) and were significantly higher than after GHRH stimulation alone from 180 min up to the end of the test. Our results demonstrate that in active acromegaly theophylline blunts the GH response to GHRH, though this effect is not uniformly seen in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in acromegaly before and after adenomectomy

The GHRH test may represent a new tool in the study of GH dynamics in acromegaly. GH responsiveness to GHRH 1-40 (50 micrograms iv) has been studied in 21 acromegalic patients. Nineteen out of 21 had active disease. Five patients were also studied 1-12 months after neurosurgery. Two apparently cured acromegalics were studied 1-2 yr after surgery. GH secretion has been evaluated in all patients by means of TRH, bromocriptine and insulin hypoglycemia tests, too. GH response to GHRH has also been performed in 14 normal subjects. In acromegaly, GH responses after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo) were variable. The GH peak ranged from 8 to 445 ng/ml in patients with active disease. Maximum GH increase after GHRH (calculated as peak/basal value ratio) was significantly reduced in acromegaly (2.9 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) in comparison to controls (34.1 +/- 10.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.01). No significant differences in GH pattern after GHRH were found between untreated and previously treated patients with active disease. A significant correlation was found between GH basal levels and GH incremental area (p less than 0.05) and between GH basal and peak levels (p less than 0.01) after GHRH. A significant increase in PRL secretion was observed in acromegalic patients after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo). No discernable variation was found in the other pituitary hormones pattern after the peptide administration. A positive correlation was observed between GH increase after GHRH and insulin hypoglycemia (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The growth hormone clamp technique: inhibition of growth hormone release by growth hormone occurs independently of free fatty acids

It has been suggested that growth hormone (GH) can inhibit its own release: in fact it has repeatedly been shown that an acute methionyl-GH (met-GH) infusion blocks the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). However, met-GH infusions are accompanied by a significant increase of free fatty acids (FFA), which can block GH release. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inhibition of GH response to GHRH also occurs when lipolysis is pharmacologically blocked. Therefore, six normal subjects received GHRH, 50 micrograms intravenously (IV), after a 4-hour saline infusion and a 4-hour met-GH infusion (80 ng/kg/min, yielding a constant GH level of 33.6 +/- 4.63 micrograms/L), and GH release was evaluated during the following 2 hours. To prevent lipolysis, all subjects received on both occasions acipimox, an antilipolytic agent, 500 mg during the 6 hours before IV GHRH. GHRH induced a clear GH release during saline infusion (46.6 +/- 2.70 micrograms/L) and a scanty GH release during met-GH infusion (9.3 +/- 1.52 micrograms/L; P less than .01). Plasma levels of FFA, somatostatin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and glucagon and serum insulin levels were unaffected, while blood glucose levels slightly decreased during saline infusion, but not during GH infusion. These data confirm that met-GH inhibits GHRH-induced GH release, and demonstrate that this inhibition is not mediated by FFA levels.     

Arginine normalizes the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in adult patients receiving chronic daily immunosuppressive glucocorticoid therapy.

Glucocorticoids are thought to inhibit GH secretion through an enhancement of endogenous somatostatin tone. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of arginine, a secretagogue that increases GH secretion acting at the hypothalamic level, probably by decreasing somatostatin tone, on GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion in three male and five female adult patients with nonendocrine disease who were receiving daily immunosuppressive glucocorticoid therapy. Six normal subjects (four males and two females) served as controls. GHRH-induced GH secretion was evaluated after 30-min iv infusion of saline (100 mL) or arginine (30 g) in 100 mL saline. After saline administration, steroid-treated patients showed a blunted GH response to GHRH (GH peak, 8.7 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L) compared to that of normal subjects (GH peak, 23.8 +/- 3.9 micrograms/L). The GH responses to GHRH increased (P less than 0.05) after pretreatment with arginine compared to saline pretreatment in both normal subjects (GH peak, 36.6 +/- 4.0 micrograms/L) and steroid-treated patients (GH peak, 28.4 +/- 5.5 micrograms/L). The GH responses to GHRH plus arginine were not significantly different in steroid-treated and normal subjects. Thus, arginine is able to normalize the GH response to GHRH in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid treatment. Our data are evidence that the stimulatory action of arginine and the inhibitory action of glucocorticoids on GH secretion are mediated by opposite effects on hypothalamic somatostatin tone.     

Medical management of acromegaly due to ectopic production of growth hormone-releasing hormone by a carcinoid tumor

A 59-yr-old woman with a disseminated carcinoid tumor was evaluated for acromegaly. She had previously undergone a hypophysectomy for acromegaly and an enlarged pituitary, with a reduction in her serum GH levels from 100 to 4 micrograms/L. Recurrence of acromegalic symptoms 2 yr later was accompanied by elevated serum GH (16 micrograms/L) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I; 528 micrograms/L) and plasma GHRH levels (12 micrograms/L; normal, less than 30 ng/L). Computed tomographic scan did not reveal pituitary enlargement. Metastatic carcinoid tissue in bone removed at biopsy contained GHRH (100 pg/mg tissue). High performance liquid chromatography of plasma GHRH revealed predominantly GHRH-(3-40)-OH, a biologically inactive GHRH metabolite, along with mature GHRH forms, while carcinoid tissue contained both GHRH-(1-40)-OH and GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Treatment with pergolide initially resulted in reduction in serum GH and IGF-I levels and amelioration of symptoms of acromegaly. However, after 14 months of pergolide therapy, serum GH levels increased despite administration of up to 1000 micrograms pergolide/day. Plasma GHRH levels remained elevated throughout the treatment period. Subsequent treatment with SMS 201-995, a long-acting somatostatin analog, for over 1 yr resulted in sustained reductions of ectopic GHRH secretion, GH hypersecretion, and IGF-I levels. Plasma GHRH levels correlated with simultaneously measured serum GH levels in response to acute SMS 201-995 administration. SMS 201-995 was an effective medical treatment for acromegaly caused by ectopic GHRH production in this patient.     

Characterization of growth hormone-releasing hormone receptors in pituitary adenomas from patients with acromegaly

GHRH receptors in pituitary adenoma cell membranes from five patients with acromegaly were characterized using [125I] [His1,Nle27]GHRH-(1-32)NH2 ([125I]GHRHa) as a ligand. Specific binding of [125I]GHRHa to adenoma cell membranes was maximal within 20 min at 24 C, remained stable for 60 min, and was reversible in the presence of 500 nmol/L human GHRH-(1-44)NH2 (hGHRH). The specific binding increased linearly with 10-160 micrograms cell membrane protein. This binding was inhibited by 10(-11)-10(-6) mol/L hGHRH in a dose-dependent manner, with an ID50 of 0.20 nmol/L, but not by 10(-7) mol/L vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucagon, somatostatin-14, somatostatin-28, TRH, LHRH, and CRH. The specific binding of [125I]GHRHa to the membranes was saturable, and Scatchard analysis of the data revealed an apparent single class of high affinity GHRH receptors in five adenomas from acromegalic patients; the mean dissociation constant was 0.30 +/- 0.07 (+/- SE) nmol/L, and the mean maximal binding capacity was 26.7 +/- 7.0 (+/- SE) fmol/mg protein. In three nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, GHRH receptors were not detected. The plasma GH response to hGHRH (100 micrograms) injection was studied in four acromegalic patients before surgery. Plasma GH levels increased variably in response to hGHRH injection in all four patients. However, there was no correlation between the characteristics of the tumor GHRH receptors and plasma GH responsiveness in these patients. We conclude that pituitary GH-secreting adenomas have specific GHRH receptors. Exogenously administered GHRH presumably acts via these receptors, but the variations in plasma GH responsiveness to hGHRH in these patients cannot be directly related to the variations in binding characteristics of the GHRH receptors on the GH-secreting adenoma cells.     

Effects of galanin on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa

Galanin (GAL) elicits growth hormone (GH) release in normal subjects through interaction with hypothalamic somatostatin. GAL also stimulates GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in vitro. In rats, GAL is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, but this effect is not clear in humans. We have thus investigated GAL effects on GH and PRL release in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), known to have altered regulation of the GH-insulin-like growth factor axis and PRL dynamics, and compared the effects of GHRH and GAL on GH and PRL secretion in AN and normal healthy subjects. Eight women with AN (15 to 27 years; body mass index [BMI], 17 to 19.5 kg/m2) were treated with (1) GHRH 50 microg intravenous (IV) injection, (2) porcine GAL 500 microg infusion from -10 to +30 minutes, and (3) 135-minutes saline infusion as a control, respectively. Both peptides induced a significant increase in plasma GH in AN patients (peak level, 27.41 +/- 5.50 microg/L after GAL and 18.97 +/- 2.67 microg/L after GHRH). When data for AN patients and the control group were compared, GH peak levels after GAL were significantly higher in AN patients (27.41 +/- 5.50 v 13.64 +/- 2.32 microg/L), while GH peak levels after GHRH were not different between the 2 groups (18.97 +/- 2.67 v 15.98 +/- 3.88 microg/L). PRL levels significantly increased after both GHRH (peak, 11.70 +/- 2.80 microg/L) and GAL (peak, 18.02 +/- 5.10 microg/L) treatment in AN patients, but not in normal subjects. We conclude that GAL stimulates exaggerated GH release in AN patients as compared with normal controls, suggesting a dual hypothalamic interaction via both an increase in endogenous GHRH and a decrease in somatostatin secretion. Finally, GAL may act as a PRL secretagogue in AN patients.     

Studies on the response of growth hormone (GH) secretion to GH-releasing hormone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and somatostatin in acromegaly

The plasma GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), TRH, or GnRH administration was examined in 25 acromegalic patients. Plasma GH levels increased in 21 patients after GHRH, in 19 after TRH, and in 4 after GnRH. The four GHRH nonresponders had had acromegaly longer than had the GHRH responders. No specific combination of GH responsiveness to these 3 releasing hormones was found among the patients. Infusion of 1 mg GHRH for 150 min gradually increased plasma GH levels, with some fluctuations, from the beginning to the end of infusion in normal subjects and in 7 patients who were GHRH responders, but a bolus injection of 100 micrograms GHRH at the end of the infusion did not further elevate plasma GH levels. These results suggest that desensitization to GHRH occurred in the normal subjects and acromegalic patients. However, in 5 acromegalic patients who responded to both GHRH and TRH, a bolus injection of 500 micrograms TRH given at the end of the 150-min infusion of 1 mg GHRH evoked a further plasma GH rise. In 5 normal subjects and 2 patients who were responders to GHRH but not TRH, a bolus injection of 500 micrograms TRH did not cause plasma GH elevation at the end of 150-min infusion of 1 mg GHRH. These results imply that TRH and GnRH stimulate GH secretion from the adenoma cells in vivo through receptors different from those for GHRH. In vitro studies using cultured pituitary adenoma cells from 2 patients revealed that the responses of GH secretion to GHRH were similar to those in vivo. These data, therefore, suggest that the responsiveness of GH secretion to stimuli is determined by the specificity of the receptors on adenoma cells. The action of somatostatin-28 was more potent than that of somatostatin-14 in the suppression of GH secretion from adenoma cells.     

The control on growth hormone release by free fatty acids is maintained in acromegaly

Free fatty acids (FFA) physiologically regulate GH release via a negative feedback. The aim of this study was to examine whether such feedback is preserved in acromegaly, a condition in which alterations in other regulatory mechanisms of GH release occur. Eight acromegalic patients (group 1: five women and three men, 43.0 +/- 4.2 yr old, mean +/- SE) received per os on two different days, at a 3 day-interval, in a random order, placebo or 250 mg of acipimox, an inhibitor of lipolysis analogous to nicotinic acid, at 0700 and 1100 h. In both tests GHRH (1-29 NH2), 50 microg, was administered i.v. at 1300 h. Blood samples for GH, FFA, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and glucose were taken from 0900 to 1500 h, and the time period considered for statistical analysis was 1200-1500 h, representative of steady-state condition for FFA, IRI, and glucose. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly lower after acipimox than after placebo (0.05 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.01). In contrast, both mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) and the mean GH response to GHRH (GH delta area, 1300-1500 h) were significantly higher after acipimox than after placebo (12.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 1.2 microg/L, P < 0.01; 2937 +/- 959 vs. 1154 +/- 432 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). The increase in both basal GH levels and GH delta area occurred in all eight patients. Acipimox also reduced mean serum IRI (83 +/- 12 vs. 112 +/- 14 pmol/L) and blood glucose (5.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) levels, as compared with placebo (P < 0.03 or less). Eight acromegalic patients (group 2: six women and two men, 46.6 +/- 5.7 yr old) underwent a constant i.v. 10% lipid infusion (150 mL/h), started at 0900 h and continued until 1500 h. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly higher during lipid infusion than after placebo (0.27 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.02); in contrast, mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) were reduced by lipid infusion, as compared with placebo (9.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.6 +/- 4.4 microg/L, P < 0.01), and the same occurred for the GH delta area after GHRH (2498 +/- 1643 vs. 4512 +/- 1988 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). Serum IRI and blood glucose levels were similar after placebo and during lipid infusion. These data indicate that, in acromegaly, the acute reduction of circulating FFA levels results in increased GH release, whereas the increase in circulating FFA levels is accompanied by a reduced GH release. Taken together, these findings suggest that, in acromegaly, the control of FFA on GH release is preserved.     

Plasma growth hormone (GH) responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone in patients with acromegaly--the effect of dexamethasone pretreatment and the comparison with GH responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone and GH-releasing hormone.

It has been reported that paradoxical GH responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) occur in only few patients with acromegaly. However, we have observed such responses in 7 of 14 active acromegalic patients. Therefore, we have studied the GH responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) (500 micrograms, iv), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (LHRH) (100 micrograms, iv) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (100 micrograms, iv) in these patients to examine the relationships between the GH responses to CRH and the responses to these hypothalamic hormones. Further, these patients received human CRH (1-41) NH2 (100 micrograms, iv) with or without dexamethasone (Dex) pretreatment (1 mg/100 ml saline, iv, from -30 to +30 min) to study the mechanism of CRH-induced GH secretion, and a perifusion experiment was performed using adenoma tissue obtained at surgery from one patient (10(-7) M CRH and TRH were added) to elucidate whether CRH acts directly at the pituitary level. Aberrant GH responses induced by CRH were found in 7 of 14 (50%) acromegalic patients (TRH responders: 10/13, 77%; LHRH responders: 2/9, 22%; GHRH responders: 10/12, 83%). In these patients, percent GH increment induced by CRH ranged from 81 to 144% (Mean +/- SE, 118 +/- 8%), and the GH peak (19 +/- 3 min) appeared as early as after TRH (23 +/- 4 min, N = 10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly

The plasma levels of immunoreactive-GHRH in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly were studied in the basal state and during various tests by a sensitive and specific RIA. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 22 patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism was 6.3 +/- 2.3 ng/l (mean +/- SD), which was significantly lower than that in normal children (9.8 +/- 2.8 ng/l, N = 21), and eight of them had undetectable concentrations (less than 4.0 ng/l). Little or no response of plasma GHRH to oral administration of L-dopa was observed in 7 of 10 pituitary dwarfs, and 3 of the 7 patients showed a response of plasma GH to iv administration of GHRH (1 microgram/kg). These findings suggest that one of the causes of idiopathic pituitary dwarfism is insufficient GHRH release from the hypothalamus. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 14 patients with acromegaly and one patient with gigantism was 8.0 +/- 3.9 ng/l, which was slightly lower than that in normal adults (10.4 +/- 4.1 ng/l, N = 72). One acromegalic patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I had a high level of plasma GHRH (270 ng/l) with no change in response to L-dopa and TRH test. In 3 untreated patients with acromegaly L-dopa did not induce any response of plasma GHRH in spite of inconsistent GH release, and in 4 patients with acromegaly, TRH evoked no response of plasma GHRH in spite of a marked GH release, suggesting that the GH responses are not mediated by hypothalamic GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)