Profiles of "manic" symptoms in bipolar I, bipolar II and major depressive disorders

BACKGROUND: Classical authors such as Kraepelin, as well as the emerging literature during the past decade, indicate that manic-like signs and symptoms are present to a variable degree in all mood disorders. Current nosography does not differentiate between them and only the number of symptoms or severity is used for classification. This is particularly true for mania and hypomania. This paper will analyze the patterns of manic symptoms in bipolar I (BP-I), bipolar II (BP-II) and major depressive disorders (MDD), to test the hypothesis that mania and hypomania have different profiles, and ascertain which excitatory manic phenomena do occur in unipolar MDD. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-two inpatients (158 BP-I, 122 BP-II and 372 MDD) were assessed using the operational criteria for psychotic illness checklist (OPCRIT) [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 48 (1991) 764] with a lifetime perspective. Manic or hypomanic symptoms were investigated and compared between BP-I, BP-II and MDD. RESULTS: When compared with BP-II, BP-I disorder had a higher prevalence of reckless activity, distractibility, psychomotor agitation, irritable mood and increased self-esteem. These five symptoms correctly classified 82.8% of BP-I and 80.1% of BP-II patients. One or two manic symptoms were observed in more than 30% of major depressive patients; psychomotor agitation was the most frequent manifestations present in 18% of the MDD group. LIMITATIONS: We did not control for severity of symptoms, nor for neuroleptic use that could produce akathisia. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that mania and hypomania can be differentiated in their symptom profiles, and highlights the presence of few manic symptoms, particularly psychomotor agitation, in MDD. From the standpoint of number of manic signs and symptoms, controlling for psychomotor agitation did not substantially change the predictive power of the remaining manic symptoms. Given that excitatory manic signs and symptoms are present to a decreasing degree in BP-I, BP-II and MDD, these disorders can be proposed to lie along a dimensional model. Overall, these data are compatible with the concept of a bipolar spectrum, whereby each of the affective subtypes requires specific genetic factors.     

Serum neurotrophin-3 is increased during manic and depressive episodes in bipolar disorder

Accumulating evidence suggest that neural changes and cognitive impairment may accompany the course of bipolar disorder. Such detrimental effects of cumulative mood episodes may be related to changes in neurotrophins that take place during mood episodes but not during euthymic phases. The present study investigated serum neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) levels in patients with bipolar disorder during manic, depressed, and euthymic states, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich-ELISA). Serum NT-3 levels were increased in manic (p<0.001) and depressed (p<0.001) BD patients, as compared with euthymic patients and normal controls. These findings suggest that the NT-3 signaling system may play a role in the pathophysiology of BD.     

Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor is decreased in bipolar disorder during depressive and manic episodes

Genetic and pharmacological studies have suggested that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be associated with the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). The present study investigated serum BDNF levels in manic, depressed, euthymic BD patients and in matched healthy controls, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich-ELISA). Serum BDNF levels were decreased in manic (p = 0.019) and depressed (p = 0.027) BD patients, as compared with euthymic patients and controls. Serum BDNF levels were negatively correlated with the severity of manic (r = −0.37, p = 0.005) and depressive (r = −0.30, p = 0.033) symptoms. These findings further support the hypothesis that the BDNF signaling system may play a role in the pathophysiology of BD.     

Prevalence and clinical correlates of residual depressive symptoms in bipolar II disorder

BACKGROUND: Most patients with unipolar and bipolar I disorder have residual symptoms, despite successful treatment. The appraisal of subsyndromal symptomatology has important implications for pathophysiological models of disease and relapse prevention. Residual symptoms in bipolar II disorder were studied insufficiently. The study of residual symptoms in bipolar II disorder is important, because many depressed outpatients may suffer from it and because bipolar II disorder may be distinct from type I. The study aims were to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of persistent residual depressive symptoms in bipolar II disorder. METHODS: 138 consecutive patients with bipolar II disorder and 83 unipolar disorder outpatients, presenting for major depressive episode treatment in private practice, were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Clinician's Version. Study variables were persistent (more than 2 years) residual depressive symptoms, age, gender, age at onset, illness duration, recurrences, axis I comorbidity, severity, psychotic, melancholic and atypical features. RESULTS: The prevalence of residual depressive symptoms was 44.9% in bipolar II disorder and 43.3% in unipolar disorder. Residual depressive symptoms in bipolar II and unipolar disorders were significantly and positively associated with illness duration and recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent residual depressive symptoms were common in bipolar II disorder. Residual unipolar and bipolar II depressive symptoms were related to duration of illness and number of recurrences. Reducing these variables could reduce and prevent residual symptoms. A mechanism of kindling (more mood episodes leading to worse outcome) could be that of leaving a larger and larger amount of residual symptoms after the acute episode has subsided.     

Increased serum glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor immunocontent during manic and depressive episodes in individuals with bipolar disorder

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a neurotrophic factor from the transforming growth factor β family, which plays a role in the development and function of hippocampal cells. Preclinical studies suggest that changes in neurotrophic growth factor systems might be involved in the pathophysiology of mood disorders including bipolar disorder (BD) [E.J. Nestler, M. Barrot, R.J. DiLeone, A.J. Eisch, S.J. Gold, L.M. Monteggia, Neurobiology of depression, Neuron 34 (2002) 13–25]. This is the first study to analyze GDNF immunocontent in BD subjects across different mood states, including mania, depression, and remission (euthymia). Fourty-four bipolar patients (14 depressed, 15 manic, and 15 euthymic) and 14 healthy controls, diagnosed according to the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV were studied. Serum GDNF immunocontent was measured using Western blotting. Serum GDNF immunocontent was increased in manic (F = 42.31; p = 0.001; one-way ANOVA) and depressed (F = 42.31; p = 0.004; one-way ANOVA) bipolar patients, but not in euthymic patients as compared with controls. Our results indicate that changes in GDNF immunocontent occur during acute major affective episodes in bipolar subjects. These results further support the role of neurotrophins in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Whether the observed increase in GDNF immunocontent correspond to a pathological or an adaptive response remains to be determined.     

Increased serum glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor immunocontent during manic and depressive episodes in individuals with bipolar disorder

Activation of the cardiac "sympathetic afferent" reflex (CSAR) has been reported to depress the arterial baroreflex and enhance the arterial chemoreflex via a central mechanism. In the present study, we used single-unit extracellular recording techniques to examine the effects of stimulation of cardiac sympathetic afferents on baro- or chemosensitive neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) in anesthetized rats. Of 54 barosensitive NTS neurons tested for their response to epicardial application of capsaicin (0.4 microg), 38 were significantly (P<0.01) inhibited by 38% while 16 did not respond. Of 42 NTS chemosensitive neurons tested for their response to capsaicin, 33 were significantly (P<0.01) excited by 47% while 9 did not respond. In addition, of 12 both barosensitive and chemosensitive NTS neurons tested for capsaicin, 2 were excited, 7 were inhibited, and 3 did not respond. In conclusion, this study indicates that CSAR activation inhibited NTS barosensitive neurons and excited NTS chemosensitive neurons, suggesting that the NTS plays an important role in processing the interactions between these cardiovascular reflexes.     

The prevalence and clinical correlates of anger attacks during depressive episodes in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Anger attacks, characterized by sudden episodes of intense anger with autonomic arousal, have been described in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study compared the prevalence and clinical significance of anger attacks in unipolar versus bipolar depression. METHODS: Using the questionnaire of Fava et al. [Psychopharmacol. Bull. 27(3) (1991) 275-279], we assessed rates of anger attacks among outpatients with MDD (n=50) or bipolar disorder (BPD) (n=29) who were currently in a pure depressive episode. RESULTS: Anger attacks were significantly more common among bipolar (62%) than unipolar (26%) depressed individuals. In a multiple logistic regression, the presence of anger attacks emerged as a significant predictor of bipolarity. LIMITATIONS: This preliminary finding should be confirmed in a larger sample. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that anger attacks may be a common feature of bipolar depression.     

Prediction of clinical course of bipolar manic depressive illness treated with lithium

A group of bipolar manic depressive patients attending a routine lithium clinic were investigated. The results suggest that, when on treatment with lithium, manic depressive patients with a good prognosis tend to have a higher erythrocyte Na-K ATPase and higher plasma and erythrocyte lithium concentrations than those with a poor prognosis. There was no evidence to suggest that the erythrocyte: plasma lithium ratio was useful in predicting clinical response to lithium therapy. There was also a positive correlation between plasma lithium concentration and Na-K ATPase activity, confirming that in manic depressive subjects lithium produces a rise in erythrocyte Na-K ATPase activity.     

Subsyndromal depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder during clinical remission

BACKGROUND: Subsyndromal depressive symptoms seem to be quite prevalent in mood disorders although very few studies have assessed them in patients considered to be in remission by clinical and psychometric criteria. This study sought to evaluate the presence of subsyndromal depressive symptoms in bipolar and unipolar patients in clinical remission. METHODS: One-hundred seventy-six patients with DSM-IV bipolar (62 bipolar I, 58 bipolar II) or unipolar mayor depression (n=58) in clinical remission and 60 healthy subjects were assessed using several psychometric instruments including the 17 items Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). To be considered in clinical remission patients assessed with the Clinical Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Modified (CGI-BP-M) had to be stable for 6 months and scoring 6 or less in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and 8 or less in the HDRS. RESULTS: Both Unipolar Disorder (UD) and Bipolar Disorder (BD) patients in clinical remission presented statistically significant higher HRSD scores, than healthy subjects. The HRSD scores were statistically higher in UD patients under remission than in BD patients. The subsyndromal symptoms more strongly associated with a clinical diagnosis of either UD or BD were Depressed Mood, Somatic Anxiety, Impact on Work and Activities, Psychic Anxiety, Gastrointestinal and Somatic Symptoms, Retardation during the Interview and Genital Symptoms. CONCLUSION: Subsyndromal depressive symptoms are present in affective disorder patients, both UD and BD, who apparently are in clinical remission. Remitted unipolar patients may have more residual symptoms than bipolar patients, particularly in items related to anxiety and somatic complaints.     

Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety

This study examined whether humiliating marital events (HMEs; husbands' infidelity, threats of marital dissolution) precipitated Major Depressive Episodes (MDEs) when controlling for marital discord. Participants were 25 women who recently experienced an HME and 25 control women who did not experience an HME. Both groups reported similar levels of marital discord. Results indicated that HME participants were 6 times more likely to be diagnosed with an MDE than control participants. These results remained even after controlling for family and lifetime histories of depression. HME participants also reported significantly more symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety than control participants. However, HME and control participants did not report significantly different numbers of anhedonic depression and anxious arousal symptoms. The research and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.     

Delineating bipolar II mixed states in the Ravenna-San Diego collaborative study: the relative prevalence and diagnostic significance of hypomanic features during major depressive episodes

BACKGROUND: Depressive mixed state (DMX), defined by hypomanic features during a major depressive episode (MDE) is under-researched. Accordingly, study aims were to find DMX prevalence in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar II depressive phase, to delineate the most common hypomanic signs and symptoms during DMX, and to assess their sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DMX and bipolar II. METHODS: 161 unipolar and bipolar II MDE psychotropic drug- and substance-free consecutive outpatients were interviewed during an MDE with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. DMX was defined at two threshold levels as an MDE with two or more (DMX2), and with three or more (DMX3) simultaneous intra-episode hypomanic signs and symptoms. RESULTS: DMX2 was present in 73.1% of bipolar II, and in 42.1% of unipolar MDD (P<0.000); DMX3 was present in 46.3% of bipolar II, and in 7.8% of unipolar MDD (P<0.000). The most common hypomanic manifestations during MDE were irritability, distractibility, and racing thoughts. Irritability had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DMX2 and DMX3. Various combinations of irritability, distractibility, and racing thoughts correctly classified the highest number of DMX2 and DMX3, and had the strongest predictive power. DMX2 had high sensitivity and low specificity for bipolar II, whereas DMX3 had low sensitivity (46.3%) and high specificity (92.1%). LIMITATIONS: Single interviewer, cross-sectional assessment, and interviewing clinician not blind to patients' unipolar vs. bipolar status. CONCLUSIONS: When conservatively defined (>or = 3 intra-episode hypomanic signs and symptoms during MDE), DMX is prevalent in the natural history of bipolar II but uncommon in unipolar MDD. These findings have treatment implications, because of growing concerns that antidepressants may worsen DMX, which in turn may respond better to mood stabilizers. These data also have methodological implications for diagnostic practice: rather than solely depending on the vagaries of the patient's memory for past hypomanic episodes, the search for hypomanic features--ostensibly elation would not be one of those--during an index depressive episode could enhance the detection of bipolar II in otherwise pseudo-unipolar patients. Strict adherence to current clinical diagnostic interview instruments (e.g. the SCID) would make such detection difficult, if not impossible.     

Multivariate analysis of bipolar mania: Retrospectively assessed structure of bipolar I manic and mixed episodes in randomized clinical trial participants

BackgroundManic episodes are heterogeneous. Mixed states may differ in important clinical characteristics from other manic episodes. However, it has not been established whether mixed states are a distinct type of episodes, or a common basic structure exists across manic episodes.MethodsUsing 2179 well-characterized subjects in the pretreatment phase of six randomized, clinical trials, we conducted rotated factor analysis followed by cluster analysis, using all items from the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Scale. Analyses were conducted for all subjects (n=2179) and for those in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) mixed (n=644) and non-mixed (n=1535) episodes separately.ResultsThere were five factors characterized (in order of variance accounted for) as depression, mania, sleep disturbance, judgment/impulsivity and irritability/hostility. Cluster analysis identified five clusters. Three were predominately manic, with depression scores below average for the overall group. Two had high average depression scores; these clusters differed in irritability/hostility. Judgment/impulsivity scores were similar across factors. Essentially identical factors and clusters existed whether analyses were done in all subjects or only in subjects classified by DSM-IV as mixed or non-mixed.LimitationsExclusion criteria of studies may limit generalizability of findings.DiscussionAll manic episodes, whether mixed or non-mixed, shared a similar structure according to factor/cluster analysis. Patients with high depression factor scores were heterogeneous with respect to irritability. These data suggest that depressive symptoms should be considered a dimensional property across manic episodes, rather than as defining a specific type of episode.     

Temperament in the clinical differentiation of depressed bipolar and unipolar major depressive patients

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in temperament profiles between patients with recurrent unipolar and bipolar depression. METHOD: Depressed individuals with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 94) and those with bipolar (n = 59) disorders (about equally divided between types I and II) were recruited by newspaper advertisement, radio and television announcements, flyers and newsletters, and word of mouth. All patients were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III-R (SCID) and had the severity of their depressive episode assessed by means of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. All patients filled out the TEMPS-A, a validated instrument. RESULTS: Temperament differences between bipolar and MDD patients were examined using MANCOVA. Overall significant effect of the fixed factor (bipolar vs. unipolar) was noted for the temperament scores [Hotelling's F((5,142)) = 2.47, p < 0.05]. Overall effects were found for age [F((5,142)) = 2.40, p < 0.05], but not for gender and severity of depression [F((5,142)) = 1.65, p = 0.15 and F((5,142)) = 0.66, p = 0.66, respectively]. Dependent variables included the five subscales of the TEMPS-A, but only the cyclothymic temperament scores showed significant between-group differences. LIMITATION: Small bipolar subsample cell sizes did not permit to test the specificity of the findings for bipolar II vs. bipolar I patients. CONCLUSION: The finding that the clyclothymic subscale is significantly elevated in the bipolar vs. the unipolar depressive group supports the theoretical assumptions upon which the scale is based, and suggests that it might become a useful tool for clinical and research purposes.     

Familial clustering of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder

PurposeTo investigate familial clustering of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.MethodsCombining data from a psychiatric case registry and Statistics Netherlands provided information on 4,673 affected probands and 18,692 matched population controls.ResultsProbands with schizophrenia had relative risks (RRs) for having a sibling with schizophrenia of 3.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60–5.46) and with bipolar disorder of 1.79 (95% CI: 0.64–4.96) as compared with a reference proband. Probands affected with bipolar disorder have an RR of 6.51 (95% CI: 2.60–16.29) for having a sibling with bipolar disorder and of 1.71 (95% CI: 0.71–4.14) for having a sibling with schizophrenia as compared with a reference proband. Probands affected with major depressive disorder also have increased risk for having a sibling with schizophrenia (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.54–2.72) as compared with a reference proband, which was similar to the risk for having a sibling with major depressive disorder (RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.63–2.24) or bipolar disorder (RR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.18–3.60).ConclusionOur findings suggest, as previous studies have, that risk across schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is considerably lower (twofold) than within diagnostic entities, whereas for major depressive disorder risk is similar within and across diagnostic entities.Genet Med 2012:14(3):338–341     

The development of major depressive episodes during the course of dysthymic and episodic major depressive disorders: a retrospective examination of life events

BACKGROUND: The present study examined whether stressful life events are associated with the development of major depressive episodes (MDEs) in a longitudinal, retrospective study of dysthymic and episodic major depressive disorders. METHODS: Sixty-seven outpatients with DSM-III-R dysthymia and 38 outpatients with non-chronic major depression were followed up 30-60 months after entry into the study. Follow-up assessments included a modified version of Paykel's (1997) Interview for Recent Life Events (IRLE) and Keller et al.'s (1987) Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. Life events were assessed retrospectively in the 6 months before the most recent MDE or in the 6 months before follow-up for patients without a MDE. RESULTS: In dysthymic patients, MDEs were significantly associated with a new life event in the context of an ongoing chronic stressor. In episodic major depressive patients, relapses were associated with new life events regardless of an ongoing chronic stressor. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. It was also a conservative test of the association between life events and MDEs as the follow-up period over which life events were assessed was long, increasing the possibility of forgetting; events occurring less than 1 month before relapse were excluded to avoid confounding the event with the MDE; life events were assessed for a more distant time period for patients who experienced MDEs than those who did not; and an abbreviated version of the IRLE was used which may have failed to identify less severe events. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that life events may play a role in the onset of MDEs in persons with dysthymic disorder and those with major depressive disorder. Thus, clinicians should monitor dysthymic patients after a stressful life event, particularly if it occurs in the context of a chronic, ongoing stressor.     

Psychological predictors of single and recurrent major depressive episodes.

AIM: To examine for differential psychological risk factors in a nonclinical sample having single or recurrent episodes of major depression. METHODS: A cohort of 164 subjects was assessed initially in 1978 in their last year of teacher training, and at five-yearly intervals in 1983, 1988 and 1993. Experience of episodes of DSM major depression and anxiety disorders from each wave were summed and three groups (nil, one, and two or more episodes of major depression) were derived. The cohort also completed a series of self-report measures including neuroticism, state and trait depression, self-esteem, dependency, childhood parental environment and social support. RESULTS: The group with two or more episodes were distinctly more likely to have met lifetime criteria for an anxiety disorder and to have had multiple anxiety disorder diagnoses over their lifetime. Groups with one or more episodes reported higher mean scores for trait depression, neuroticism and maternal overprotection and lower mean scores for paternal care and self esteem at baseline in 1978, but these variables did not predict differences between groups with single and recurrent episodes. At 1993, those with two or more episodes differed from those with none and single episodes in reporting lower trait depression scores and decreased perception of satisfactory social support over time, suggesting a psychological scarring effect for those with repeated episodes.