Long‐term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: An open,observational, extension study of a three‐month,randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Objective

Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with infliximab, an anti–tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, was shown to be efficacious in patients with active disease during a 3‐month treatment period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab treatment of AS for a 1‐year period.

Methods

This study was an open, observational, extension study of a 3‐month, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. All patients who had tolerated infliximab (infliximab/infliximab group) or placebo (placebo/infliximab 12‐week crossover group) therapy for 3 months entered the open extension trial (n = 65). Infliximab was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks after the induction phase (weeks 0, 2, and 6). The primary end point was a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).

Results

At week 54, a total of 54 of the 69 patients (78%) continued to take infliximab. The intent‐to‐treat primary efficacy analysis at week 54 showed that 47% of patients in the infliximab/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 31–63) and 51% of the patients in the placebo/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 36–67) achieved 50% improvement in BASDAI scores. In the analysis of those who completed the study, the mean BASDAI scores improved between weeks 0 and 54 in both treatment groups: from 6.6 to 2.4 in the infliximab/infliximab group and from 6.3 to 2.6 in the placebo/infliximab group. The dosage of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs was reduced in ∼70% of the patients. There were significant improvements in measures of functioning, metrologic parameters, and quality of life. Between weeks 12 and 54, a total of 4 patients had serious adverse events that were possibly related to infliximab and resulted in their discontinuing the study.

Conclusion

Infliximab therapy in AS patients resulted in a rapid and significant improvement in BASDAI scores (>50% improvement) and a durable response for 1 year. The safety profile of infliximab in AS was comparable to that observed in the postmarketing experience for the approved indications.

     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT)

OBJECTIVE: The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C-reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24. RESULTS: Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24-week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF-36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24-week study period.     

A 2-year comparative open label randomized study of efficacy and safety of etanercept and infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated to be of value in reducing AS disease activity in clinical trials. The efficacy and safety of both etanercept and infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis were compared in a 2-year open label randomised study. Our results are consistent with a significant more rapid clinical improvement in the infliximab treated group. Treatment with both etanercept and infliximab at the end of the study was effective, safe, and well tolerated.     

抗肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体治疗强直性脊柱炎的短期临床观察

目的评价负荷剂量的抗肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体infliximab治疗强直性脊柱炎（AS）的临床疗效和安全性。方法本研究为2个中心的开放性Ⅱ期临床试验,患者为确诊的AS患者,并且疾病处于活动期。患者分别在试验的第0、2、6周接受静脉输注infliximab5mg／kg,并随访至10周,主要疗效指标为达到AS疗效评价标准20（ASAS20）的患者比例,次要疗效指标包括达到临床显效的患者比例,与基线值相比BathAS疾病活动指数（BASDAI）、BathAS功能指数、BathAS测量指数、脊柱痛、夜间痛、脊柱炎症、病人总体评估指数、肌腱端炎指数、整体关节肿胀指数、生活质量健康问卷SF-36改善的状况。结果63例患者（男性占79％,平均年龄32岁,平均病程10年,HLA-B27阳性占90％）纳入研究,第10周试验结束时,84％的患者达到ASAS20的改善程度;有30％的患者达到临床显效标准;70％的患者达到BASDAI评分改善大于50％,54％的患者达到BASDAI评分改善大于70％。其他各项疗效指标也反映出相似的改善程度及趋势。最常见的不良反应为上呼吸道感染和皮肤及其附属器官的损害,其次是肝功能异常,2例患者发生严重的皮炎伴有脱发,1例患者在第3次输注药物过程中因出现输注反应而停药。近期随访结果显示,疗效可持续2～8个月,停止治疗后无新的不良反应发生。结论负荷剂量infliximab的安全性和耐受性好,能迅速减轻AS的症状和体征,并可改善AS患者的功能、活动范围和生活质量。     

Infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: an observational study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy, toxicity, and drug discontinuation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with infliximab. METHODS: 35 patients with AS with mean (SD) age 42.5 (12.6) years and mean (SD) disease duration 14.5 (8.0) years were studied for 2 years. Patients entering the study had a negative tuberculin skin test, were fully informed about the treatment, and were followed up regularly. Infliximab, 5 mg/kg weight, was given intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Data concerning infliximab tolerability, adverse events, interval, and drug discontinuation were all recorded. Clinical improvement according to the BASDAI and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study group (ASAS) 20%, 40%, and ASAS 5/6 response criteria were recorded. RESULTS: After 1 year, 20 (57%) patients achieved the BASDAI 50% response criteria, 25 (71%) achieved ASAS 20%, 23 (66%) reached ASAS 40%, and 18 (51%) attained ASAS 5/6. After 2 years' treatment, 11 (31%) patients achieved BASDAI 50% response criteria, 14 (40%) ASAS 20%, 11 (31%) ASAS 40%, and 9 (26%) ASAS 5/6. Clinical improvement was associated with an improved BASFI and reduction of CRP. After 2 years' treatment, "infliximab survival" was 89%. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were mild; 3 patients discontinued the study. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with AS.     

Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To obtain results of the second year extension of an original 3 month randomised, placebo controlled trial (and the 1 year extension study) assessing the use of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha, for the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Of the 54 patients with AS who completed the first year of the study, 52 continued to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks up to week 102. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at week 102. Other assessments included patient and physician global assessments, quality of life as assessed by Short Form-36, Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Metrology Index, and C reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: Improvement in signs and symptoms of AS seen during the first year of the study was sustained during the second year. Forty nine patients (71% of 69 enrolled patients and 49/52 (94%) patients who started year 2) completed the study up to week 102. Thirty (58%) patients achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in the BASDAI score at week 102. Scores for other efficacy assessments were similar at weeks 54 and 102. Median CRP levels remained low at weeks 54 and 102 (3.9 and 4.3 mg/l, respectively). Side effects during the second year of the study were similar to those of the first year of treatment with infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS treated for 2 years with infliximab 5 mg/kg exhibited a good and durable clinical response.     

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, a fully human recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets human tumor necrosis factor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized (2:1 ratio), double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate a subcutaneous injection of adalimumab, 40 mg every other week, compared with placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a 20% response according to the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group criteria for improvement (ASAS20) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the ASAS20 at week 24 and multiple measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, and function, as well as ASAS partial remission. RESULTS: At week 12, 58.2% of adalimumab-treated patients (121 of 208) achieved an ASAS20 response, compared with 20.6% of placebo-treated patients (22 of 107) (P < 0.001). More patients in the adalimumab group (45.2% [94 of 208]) than in the placebo group (15.9% [17 of 107]) had at least a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at week 12 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in the ASAS40 response and the response according to the ASAS5/6 criteria at weeks 12 and 24 were also demonstrated (P < 0.001). Partial remission was achieved by more adalimumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (22.1% versus 5.6%; P < 0.001). Adalimumab-treated patients reported more adverse events (75.0% versus 59.8% of placebo-treated patients; P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infections. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab was well-tolerated during the 24-week study period and was associated with a significant and sustained reduction in the signs and symptoms of active AS.     

Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective observational inception cohort analysis of efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab, a neutralizing antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, appears to be effective therapy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), although treatment is costly and serious infections are an increasing concern. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of infliximab in a prospective observational inception cohort of patients with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-refractory AS seen in both university and community based practice. We also used a lower dose, 3 mg/kg, than has been evaluated to date in AS. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients with AS starting infliximab therapy 3 mg/kg i.v. at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and q 2 months between April 2000 and October 2001. Data were systematically collected at baseline, 14 weeks, and 1 year, or at withdrawal, and included demographic characteristics, Bath AS indexes (BASDAI, BASFI, BASGI, BASMI), adverse events, and reasons for withdrawal. Laboratory measures included erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), serum matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1 and 3, and serum human cartilage glycoprotein-39 (YLK-40). The first 6 consecutive patients were also studied by several magnetic resonance sequences, including dynamic MRI with gadolinium augmentation of affected joints. Maximal rate of augmentation was determined at baseline and 84 days. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (m:f = 17:4), mean age 42.5 years (range 24-66), mean disease duration 13.8 years (range 3-26), were studied: 13 had active peripheral synovitis at baseline. Mean followup was 47.5 weeks (range 10-77). Four patients withdrew, 2 for serious adverse events (septic osteomyelitis and severe hypersensitivity after 3 and 2 infusions, respectively), one for lack of efficacy, and one lost to followup. Three patients required an increased dose to 5 mg/kg after 14 weeks. Efficacy data were available on 17 patients at 14 weeks; mean BASDAI improved significantly from baseline (6.2) to 14 weeks (2.8) (p < 0.001), with 10 patients (58.8%) showing at least 50% improvement (range 0-99.6%). Significant reduction in mean BASFI (43.4%; p < 0.001), BASGI (44%; p = 0.001), ESR (55%; p < 0.001), and CRP (63.5%; p = 0.01) was evident. Complete remission of peripheral joint disease was seen in 5 of 11 (45.4%) patients evaluated at 14 weeks and maximal rate of MRI defined gadolinium augmentation was significantly decreased (p = 0.04). Reductions in serum YKL-40 and MMP-1 and 3 were nonsignificant, but significant correlations were observed between changes in BASDAI, ESR, CRP, and changes in serum levels of MMP-3 and YKL-40 (p < 0.005 to p < 0.05). Followup data on 8 patients completing 1 year of therapy revealed continued efficacy at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Infliximab appears to be effective and well tolerated for both axial and peripheral joint disease in AS even at lower doses than those examined to date. Suppression of markers of cartilage degradation/turnover commensurate with reductions in clinical and laboratory measures of disease activity suggests that these markers should be further validated as surrogates for structural damage in AS. Controlled trials are warranted to further assess the potential of this agent in ameliorating structural damage.     

Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a one-year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on-demand treatment

OBJECTIVE: Continuous treatment with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) antibody infliximab is efficacious in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whereas treatment discontinuation results in disease relapse, with variable delay. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of continuous treatment with infliximab with that of a treatment regimen adapted to symptom recurrence. Methotrexate (MTX) in combination with infliximab was also tested. METHODS: Patients with active AS were randomly assigned at week 0 to receive infliximab every 6 weeks (continuous treatment) or upon symptom recurrence (on-demand treatment), following infusions at weeks 4, 6, and 10. Patients in the on-demand group were randomly assigned to receive either MTX in combination with infliximab or infliximab alone. Patients were monitored for 1 year. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who met the ASsessment in AS International Working Group criteria for 20% improvement (ASAS20) at week 58. RESULTS: Of 247 patients, 124 were assigned to receive infliximab every 6 weeks and 123 to receive on-demand treatment. Among the latter, 62 received MTX, and 61 received infliximab alone. A greater proportion of patients receiving infliximab every 6 weeks fulfilled ASAS20 response criteria at week 58 than did patients receiving on-demand treatment (75% versus 46%; P<0.0001). Patients in the continuous treatment group received more infliximab infusions after week 10 than did those in the on-demand group (mean+/-SD 5.8+/-2.2 versus 3.5+/-2; P<0.0001). Addition of MTX did not significantly affect the proportion of patients with an ASAS20 response at week 58, nor the number of infliximab infusions administered. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that continuous treatment of AS with infliximab is more efficacious than on-demand treatment, and that the addition of MTX to infliximab provides no significant benefit.     

The efficacy and safety of Yijinjing exercise in the adjuvant treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A protocol of randomized controlled trial

Background:Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease with high disability rate. Conventional treatment regimens have long medication cycles and are associated with adverse reactions. Therapeutic exercise is also considered to be an effective treatment for AS. Evidence suggests that Yijinjing as a low-energy exercise has advantages in adjuncting AS, but there is a lack of standard clinical studies to evaluate its efficacy and safety.Methods:This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of Yijinjing in the adjuvant treatment of AS. Approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Association of our hospital, patients were randomly divided into treatment or control groups in a ratio of 1:1. The treatment group received 4-month Yijinjing training on the basis of conventional treatment, while the control group received conventional treatment and maintained their current lifestyle. The outcome indicators included: activity index, functional ability, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, adverse reaction, etc. Finally, SPASS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data.Discussion:This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of Yijinjing exercise in the adjuvant treatment of AS, and the results of our study will provide a reference for the clinical use of Yijinjing exercise as an effective complementary alternative for the treatment of AS.     

Continuation of treatment with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-yr open follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the continuation and safety of treatment with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over a 2-yr period. METHODS: This study was an open, observational, 2-yr extension study of an open-label study of three induction infusions of infliximab in refractory AS. The fourth infusion was performed only in case of relapse. Thereafter, infliximab was to be administered as needed according to the rheumatologist's opinion; however, for some patients, infusions were performed systematically. RESULTS: None of the 50 recruited patients was lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients (26%) interrupted their treatment by infliximab: four for inefficacy, seven for adverse events, of which four were for allergic reactions to the infusion, and two for other reasons. For all of the 46 patients who had had three infusions judged efficacious and well tolerated, a fourth infusion was performed because of a flare of the disease, after a mean interval of 20.3+/-9.9 weeks (range 7.3-57.9). Over the 24 months, the mean interval between infusions was 11.6+/-9.0 weeks. This interval was longer when patients were treated only as needed (mean 14.3+/-12.1 weeks) than systematically (mean 9.8+/-5.7 weeks). Side-effects were similar to those noted in shorter-term studies; seven patients suffered serious adverse events. There were no deaths, no malignancies and no tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the long-term treatment continuation of infliximab in AS, and shows an acceptable safety profile. It appears that for some patients the disease can be controlled with long intervals between infusions; these findings warrant further studies.     

Circulating concentration of infliximab and response to treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: Results from a randomized control study

Objective

A minority of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) fail to respond to infliximab treatment. This study compared the circulating infliximab concentration and the presence of clinical symptoms in patients continuously treated with infliximab or after treatment interruption.

Methods

Patients with active AS were randomly assigned at week 0 to receive infliximab either at weeks 4, 6, 10, and then every 6 weeks (continuous treatment), or at weeks 4, 6, and 10 and then upon symptom recurrence (on‐demand treatment). The circulating concentration of infliximab was determined early during treatment and at weeks 46 and 52 for the continuous treatment group or upon relapse for the on‐demand group. Response in the continuous treatment group was defined at week 58 using the ASsessment in AS International Working Group Criteria for 20% improvement.

Results

Among the 93 patients in the continuous treatment group, treatment failure was not associated with a low circulating concentration of infliximab, either during early treatment or at 1 year. Eleven (39.2%) of the 28 nonresponders had an infliximab concentration of >10 μg/ml at week 52, whereas 9 (13.8%) of the 65 responders had an infliximab concentration of <1 μg/ml. In the on‐demand group, the infliximab concentration at relapse closely correlated with the time to relapse. However, 24 (36.9%) of 65 patients had a resurgence of clinical symptoms at an infliximab concentration of >10 μg/ml, whereas 25 patients (38.4%) had a relapse at an infliximab concentration of <0.5 μg/ml.

Conclusion

Responsiveness to infliximab treatment is highly heterogeneous among individuals with AS, and this parameter overcomes the circulating infliximab concentration to explain treatment success or failure.     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized,placebo‐controlled trial (ASSERT)

Objective

The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C‐reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24.

Results

Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24‐week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF‐36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity.

Conclusion

Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24‐week study period.

     

Effectiveness of ultrasound treatment applied with exercise therapy on patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The aim of our study was to evaluate effectiveness of ultrasound treatment applied with exercise therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Fifty-two patients, who were diagnosed according to modified New York criteria, were aged 25–60, and have spine pain, were randomly assigned to two groups. Ultrasound (US) and exercise therapy were applied to treatment group (27); placebo US treatment and exercise therapy were applied to control group (25). Patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 4 weeks after the treatment. Daily and night pain, morning stiffness, patient global assessment (PGA), doctor global assessment (DGA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and ASDAS C-reactive protein (CRP) were used as clinical parameters. In US group, all parameters showed significant improvements at 2 and 6 weeks, in comparison with the baseline. In placebo US group, significant improvement was obtained for all parameters (except tragus-to-wall distance and modified Schober test at 2 weeks and lumbar side flexion and modified Schober test at 6 weeks). Comparison of the groups showed significantly superior results of US group for parameters of BASMI (p < 0.05), tragus–wall distance (p < 0.05), PGA (p < 0.01), and DGA (p < 0.05) at 2 weeks as well as for the parameters of daily pain (p < 0.01), PGA (p < 0.05), DGA (p < 0.01), BASDAI (p < 0.05), ASDAS-CRP (p < 0.05), ASDAS-ESR (p < 0.01), lumbar side flexion (p < 0.01), the modified Schober test (p < 0.01), and ASQoL (p < 0.05) at 6 weeks. Our study showed that ultrasound treatment increases the effect of exercise in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.     

Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) in reducing the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) coincide with a reduction in spinal inflammation as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Pre- and postgadolinium T1 and STIR MR images of the spine were acquired at baseline and at week 24 in patients with AS who participated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned at an 8:3 ratio to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 6 weeks thereafter. MR images were obtained and evaluated independently by 2 readers who were blinded to the treatment allocation and time sequence of the images. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients in the infliximab group and 72 patients in the placebo group had evaluable images at baseline and week 24. About 80% of the patients had at least 1 active spinal lesion at baseline, as assessed by MRI. The improvement in the MRI Activity Score after 6 months was significantly greater in the patients who received infliximab (mean 5.02, median 2.72) than in those who received placebo (mean 0.60, median 0.0) (P < 0.001). Almost complete resolution of spinal inflammation was seen in most patients who received infliximab, irrespective of baseline activity. CONCLUSION: Patients with AS who received infliximab therapy showed a decrease in spinal inflammation as detected by MRI, whereas those who received placebo showed persistent inflammatory spondylitis.     

Sulfasalazine in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. A twenty-six-week, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Eighty-five patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were randomized to receive either sulfasalazine (less than or equal to 3 gm/day, mean 2.5) or placebo for 26 weeks. There was a statistically significant improvement, compared with baseline, in most of the clinical variables in patients receiving the active drug. Laboratory parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, IgG, IgM, and IgA) also improved during the active treatment, suggesting a beneficial effect of sulfasalazine on AS. At the end of the treatment, significant differences between the sulfasalazine and placebo groups were observed in morning stiffness, chest expansion, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and in all immunoglobulin classes. Two patients in each treatment group discontinued the trial because of side effects. Enteric-coated sulfasalazine seemed to be effective and well tolerated in patients with active AS.