CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were assessable for toxicity, and 26 were assessable for response. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 30 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV on day 1) given every 4 weeks. The dose of CPT-11 was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxic effects were observed. RESULTS: Significant toxicity was infrequent up to 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11. The maximum-tolerated toxicity was reached at a dose of 70 mg/m2. Three of six patients either had leukocyte count nadirs of less than 2,000/microL or experienced grade 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of therapy at 70 mg/m2. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and diarrhea. There were 14 partial responses (54%) among the 26 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin seems to be effective against NSCLC with acceptable toxicities. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks.     

A phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group

Based upon the results of phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a combination phase II study on NSCLC was carried out from Feb., 1992 to Sep., 1992. CPT-11 (60 mg/m2) and CDDP (80 mg/m2) were administered by i.v. drip infusion, with administration schedules of Days 1, 8, 15 and only Day 1, respectively. This therapy course was repeated every 4 weeks. Subjects were NSCLC patients of stage III B or IV disease. Those without prior chemotherapy (Group A) and those with prior therapy (Group B) were enrolled separately. Seventy patients were entered into Group A and 32 patients into Group B. One of the patients of Group A was ineligible. The characteristics of the eligible cases of Group A were: male/female, 51/18; median age, 61 years old; PS 0/1/2, 18/39/12; stage IIIB/IV, 26/43; and adeno/squamous/large, 51/15/3. Those of group B were: male/female, 20/12; median age, 62 years old; PS 0/1/2, 5/18/9; stage I/IIIB/IV, 1/7/24, adeno/squamous/large/ad-sq, 28/2/1/1. Thirty-three patients (47.8%) responded in Group A and B patients (25.0%) responded in Group B. Major adverse reactions (grade 3 or higher) of Group A/Group B were neutropenia (80.3%/73.3%), anemia (35.3%/34.4%), diarrhea (18.8%/28.1%) and nausea/vomiting (34.8%/34.4%). Median survival times for Group A and Group B were 308 and 295 days, respectively. CPT-11 in combination with CDDP is effective against NSCLC, suggesting that further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of this therapy.     

A phase II study of cisplatin, vindesine and continuously infused 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Osaka Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group.

Fifty-two previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated on a 14 day cycle with cisplatin (60 mg m-2 i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg m-2 i.v.) on day 1, followed by a 3 day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (800 mg m-2 day-1) starting on day 8. An overall response rate of 40.4% was observed in 47 evaluable patients, which included one complete response and 18 partial responses. Responses were achieved in 61.1% of stage 3 patients and 27.6% of stage 4 patients. The median progression-free interval was 19.3 weeks, and median survival time was 41.6 weeks (47.1 weeks for patients with stage 3 disease and 38.7 weeks for those with stage 4 disease). Toxicity was well tolerated. Gastrointestinal and renal toxicities did not exceed WHO grade 2. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia and anaemia occurred in nine (19%) and four (9%) patients respectively, but only grade 2 thrombocytopenia was observed. Phlebitis at the infusion site was observed in 24 patients (53%). This treatment programme achieved a response rate similar to other active combination regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, and was less toxic.     

Intensive etoposide and carboplatin chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase II trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

From April 2 to July 9, 1989, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a Phase II study of etoposide and carboplatin in advanced (AJC Stage IIIb-IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whose performance status (PS) was 0-2. The combination was given at the maximum tolerated dose as defined in a prior CALGB study. Of 76 eligible patients with follow-up data, complete responses were achieved in three patients (4%) and partial responses, in five patients (7%). One patient (1%) with evaluable disease showed improvement. There was only one partial response in the PS 2 patients. Performance status was a predictive factor for response or improvement (p = 0.0368). A high incidence (74%) of severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity and fatal sepsis in four patients was a reflection of the intensity of the chemotherapeutic regime. The median survival from study entry was 7.4 months. Thirty-seven percent of the patients survived beyond 1 year; the median survival for the PS 0-1 patients was 11.7 months for the PS 2 patients, 4.1 months. Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months, but treatment had not failed in 9% of the patients after 1 year, all of whom were PS 0-1 at time of study entry. Although the response rate with this dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen was disappointing, the median survival of PS 0-1 patients was equivalent to that of Stage III NSCLC patients in prior CALGB studies. In patients with NSCLC who are treated with chemotherapy, PS may be as important a prognostic factor as stage, when median survival is used as an endpoint.     

Fractionated administration of irinotecan and cisplatin for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group.

A phase II study of fractionated administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Between January 1996 and January 1998, 44 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. CDDP at a dose of 60 mg x m(-2) was given first and followed by CPT-11 at a dose of 50 mg x m(-2). Both drugs were given by 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8, and repeated every 4 weeks up to 4 cycles. 42 patients were evaluated for response and 44 for survival and toxicity. 20 patients (48%: 95% confidence interval 32-63%) achieved an objective response. The median duration of responses was 8 months, and the median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 12.5 months and 56.8%, respectively. Major toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 70.5% of the patients and one patient died of sepsis. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was experienced in 25.0%, but manageable by conventional therapy. In conclusion, fractionated administration of CPT-11 and CDDP was highly effective for advanced NSCLC with manageable toxicities.     

Treatment with paclitaxel 1-h infusion and carboplatin of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II multicentre trial. Joint Lung Cancer Study Group.

The primary aim of this phase II study was to determine the response rate of a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a multicentre setting. The secondary aim was to determine time to progression (TTP), 1-year survival rate and toxicity. 65 patients were treated and all of them were included in the follow up for survival and toxicity. 60 patients were followed for response rate and time to progression. 55% were stage IV patients and 45% stage IIIB patients. The treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 given as a 1-h i.v. infusion and carboplatin given as a 30 min i.v. infusion and the latter was dosed by using the Calvert formula at an area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined by iohexol clearance and was not calculated from the serum creatinine level. The chemotherapy courses were given every third week with a maximum number of six or eight courses for patients who responded late. As premedication we used 8 mg betamethasone 40 min prior to infusion and then 10 min later clemastin and cimetidine. One complete response and 18 partial responses were seen giving a response rate of 29%. 40% of the patients progressed during the treatment and 28% had stable disease. The median TTP was 22 weeks. At a minimum follow up of 1 year, the 1-year survival rate was 38% and the median survival rate was 41 weeks. Haematological toxicity was mild with no grade 4 leucopenia and only seven patients (11%) had grade 3 leucopenia. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicity was seen as myalgia 5%, allergic reaction 3% and peripheral neuropathy 6%. 15% of the patients had a dose reduction due to neurotoxicity. The haematological toxicity was much milder than we expected, probably because of more exact determination of the GFR. This trial confirms the results of earlier reported trials of the efficacy and the ease of the regimen as an out-patient treatment option in advanced NSCLC. The main problem with this treatment is peripheral neuropathy.     

Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine as a single agent in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after recurrence or failure of previous treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1995 to October 1997, 83 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) once a week for 3 weeks every 28 days. Responses were assessed every two treatment courses. The median age of the patients was 63 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 62 patients and 2 in 21 patients. The predominant histology was squamous (39 patients); 49 patients had stage IV disease and 34 patients had stage III disease (33 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA). RESULTS: Sixteen patients (19%) achieved a partial response to treatment; the median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 6 to 50 weeks). Treatment was well tolerated: grade 2 to 3 (World Health Organization standardized response criteria) leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 20% of patients, respectively. Mild asthenia was observed in 16% of patients, and peripheral edema in 5% of patients. Nausea and vomiting were present in 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: In this experience, gemcitabine showed significant activity without relevant toxicity, mainly in patients who were previously responsive to chemotherapy. This suggests a possible role for gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in patients who had a previous response or achieved stable disease with a platinum-containing regimen.     

Vinorelbine-gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an AASLC phase II trial. Austrian Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

Purpose:The purpose of the present phase II trial was todetermine the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine–gemcitabine inpatients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods:From December 1997 to February 1999, 78chemotherapy-naive patients (median age 60 years, Karnofsky performance statusof 100, 90, 80 and 70 present in 5%, 41%, 36% and18% of the patients, respectively) with stage IIIB (17%) or IV(83%) NSCLC (65% adenocarcinomas, 22% squamous-cellcarcinomas, 10% large-cell carcinomas, 3% mixed-cell carcinomas)received 25 mg/m² vinorelbine and 1200 mg/m² gemcitabineon days 1, 8 and 15 of a four-week cycle. Results:In an intent-to-treat analysis, partial responses wereseen in 19% of the patients. The median duration of response was 4.4months. The median survival time was seven months and the one-year survivalrate was 32%. Myelosuppression was the main side effect with WHO grade3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 35% and 11% of thepatients, respectively. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. Conclusions:Vinorelbine–gemcitabine is active, welltolerated and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC.Thus a randomized comparison of this combination with platinum-based protocolsis warranted in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study

Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule.Patients and methods: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by one week of rest.Results: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%–57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4–23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1–24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3–4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity.Conclusions: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.     

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy was conducted in patients with chemonaive inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess response and toxicity. From October 1997 to August 1998, 19 patients were treated. The treatment schema included tamoxifen 60 mg twice daily by mouth on days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 intravenous infusion (IV) 60 minutes with mesna on day 2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV 60 minutes on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The major toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 3 or 4 leukopenia or neutropenia occurred in 14 of 19 (73.7%) patients during treatment, and 6 patients (31.6%) experienced fever in association with the neutropenia; no toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3 anemia occurred in six patients (31.6%) during the treatment. Grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting occurred in only one patient. Toxicities other than neutropenia and anemia were minimal. After two cycles of treatment, 9 of 19 patients attained a partial response (47.4%, 95% confidence interval 24.9%-69.9%) in this study. The median time to disease progression was 6 months and median survival time was 12 months. We conclude that TIEP is an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with inoperable NSCLC.     

Randomised phase III trial of irinotecan combined with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine a standard combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to test the hypotheses that CPT-11+cisplatin is superior to cisplatin+vindesine and that CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to cisplatin+vindesine. A total of 398 patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomised to receive cisplatin+CPT-11 (CPT-P), cisplatin+vindesine (VDS-P) or CPT-11 alone (CPT). In the CPT-P arm, CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1. In the VDS-P arm, cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1, and vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. In the CPT arm, CPT-11 100 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. The median survival time was 50.0 weeks for patients on CPT-P, 45.6 weeks for those on VDS-P and 46.0 weeks for those on CPT (P=0.115, CPT-P vs VDS-P; P=0.089, CPT vs VDS-P), and the hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.11) for CPT-P vs VDS-P and 0.83 (0.64-1.09) for CPT vs VDS-P. The response rate was 43.7% for patients on CPT-P, 31.7% for those on VDS-P and 20.5% for those on CPT. Major adverse reactions were grade 4 neutropenia observed in 37, 54 and 8% of the patients on CPT-P, VDS-P and CPT, respectively; and grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea observed in 12, 3 and 15% of the patients, respectively. CPT-P therapy produces comparable survival to VDS-P in patients with advanced NSCLC. CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to VDS-P in terms of survival. The CPT-11-containing regimen is one of the most efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of the docetaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: In the present phase II study we evaluated the docetaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (DICb) combination in the outpatient setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages IIIB/IV), WHO performance status (PS) <2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy drug doses were: docetaxel: 80 mg/m2, ifosfamide: 3.5 g/m2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (based on Calvert's formula), all on day 1, followed by prophylactic G-CSF. RESULTS: Fourty patients were entered and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 64 (48-72); PS: 1 (0-1); gender: 29 males/11 females; stages: IIIB: 13 (33%), IV: 27 (67%). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included: lymph nodes: 25; bone: 7; liver: 4; brain: 5; lung nodules: 13; adrenals: 6. Responses were as follows: 22/40 [55%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54-81%] evaluable patients responded: 4 complete responses, 18 partial responses, 11 had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-14 months), median time to progression 9 months (range 2-18 months) and median overall survival 11 months (range 3-46+ months). 1-year survival was 47.5%. Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia 28/40, with 12 developing grade 4 and 12% febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia grade 3: 3/40 and grade 4: 1/40, no grade 3 neuropathy, grade 1 CNS toxicity in 3, no renal toxicity, 8 grade 2 diarrhea and 4 grade 3 vomiting. CONCLUSION: In the present phase II study the DICb combination yielded important activity and good tolerability in advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a preliminary report from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group

A recent meta-analysis and randomized studies have demonstrated that combined chemoradiotherapy is associated with a survival advantage for selected patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase II study of combined chemoradiotherapy to find a more effective combination of drugs and radiation than those previously reported for such patients. Between January 1994 and November 1996, 50 previously untreated patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC (stage IIIA with N2 or IIIB disease) were entered in this study. Patients were required to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2, age < or = 75 years and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg m(-2), days 1-5) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500 mg m(-2), days 1-5) every 4 weeks, and concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation (1.25 Gy twice daily, with a 6-h interfraction interval; total radiation dose, 62.5-70 Gy). Of the 50 patients entered, 37 (74%) responded to this chemoradiotherapy, including two (4%) with complete response. By a median follow-up time of 41.0 months, 35 patients had died and 15 were still alive. The median time to progression for responding patients was 14.1 months (range, 2.6-51.3+ months). The median survival time was 18.7 months, with a survival rate of 66.0% at 1 year, 46.0% at 2 years and 27.6% at 3 years. Survival outcome was strongly affected by the extent of nodal involvement (median survival time, 27.4 months for N0-2 disease (n = 37) vs 10.7 months for N3 disease (n = 13); P = 0.007). The major toxicities of treatment were leukopenia and neutropenia (> or = Grade 3, 58% and 60% respectively). Other toxicities of > or = Grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (26%), anaemia (26%), nausea/vomiting (16%) and radiation oesophagitis (6%). Treatment-related death occurred for one patient. Our findings suggest that cisplatin and 5-FU in combination with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation is effective and feasible for the treatment of locally advanced unresectable NSCLC. The short-term survival in this study appeared to be more encouraging than those of similar chemoradiation trials. A randomized trial will be needed to compare the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU with other platinum-based regimens together with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation. In addition, in future studies, inclusion criteria for N3 disease with or without supraclavicular involvement should be reconsidered to correctly evaluate the effect of combined chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.     

A phase II study of CPT-11, a camptothecin derivative, in patients with primary lung cancer. CPT-11 Cooperative Study Group

A Phase II study of CPT-11, a new camptothecin, was performed in patients with primary lung cancer. Patients with previously untreated non-small cell carcinomas (group A), or previously treated non-small cell carcinomas (group B), and with small cell carcinomas (group C), were enrolled in this study. CPT-11 was given at a dose of 100 mg/m2 i.v. infusion once a week for three weeks or more. Out of 153 patients enrolled, 128 (A: 67; B: 26; C: 35) were assessed to be evaluable for response by an extramural review committee. Response rates were 34.3% (23/67) for A, 0% (0/26) for B and 37.1% (13/35) for C. The response rate was 50% for previously untreated patients (4/8), and 33.3% for previously treated patients (9/27) including 2 complete responses in the group C. Major toxicities were leukopenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia and alopecia. Leukopenia and diarrhea were considered to be dose limiting toxicities, but they were reversible. It was, however, suggested that some patients should be monitored carefully for severe reactions and delay in recovery. The results showed that CPT-11 was highly effective against non-small cell and small cell carcinomas of the lung.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japanese patients

We performed a clinical phase II trial of the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel followed by a 1 to 2-h infusion of cisplatin, with a short premedication regimen. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for at least two cycles. The patients received paclitaxel 180 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Enrolled in the trial were 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB (15%) or stage IV (85%) NSCLC. Their median age was 61 years (range 43-71 years). Of the 33 patients, 10 (30%) were women and 23 (70%) were men, and 82% had adenocarcinoma. With 78 courses of chemotherapy administered, 32 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Hematologic toxicities were moderate: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of the cycles (53% of patients). Other toxicities consisted mainly of grade 1 or 2 alopecia and nausea/vomiting, but also included grade 1 or 2 neuropathy (47%), hypotension (grade 1 in 6%, grade 3 in 3%) and allergic reactions (grade 1 or 2 in 16%, grade 3 in 3%). Of 32 patients evaluable for response, a partial response was achieved in 10 (31%; 95% confidence interval 16% to 50%), stable disease was seen in 16 (50%), and disease progression was seen in 2 (6%). The median survival time was 14.8 months and the 1-year survival rate was 56%. These results suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is a well-tolerated and active regimen in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. In view of the promising survival outcomes, further evaluation in prospective randomized trials with other regimens is warranted.     

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with weekly administration of cisplatin (CDDP) for non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: CPT-11 (60 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15) in combination with CDDP (80 mg/m² on day 1) has shown promising antitumor activity for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are leukopenia and diarrhea, with a wide variation among patients. To estimate weekly CDDP administration in combination with CPT-11, a phase I study for patients with advanced NSCLC was conducted. Methods: Patients were treated with CPT-11 at a fixed dose of 60 mg/m² together with CDDP at 27 mg/m² (level 1, 6 patients), 33 mg/m² (level 2, 12 patients), and 40 mg/m² (level 3, 6 patients) with 1600 ml hydration on days 1, 8 and 15 over 4 weeks. During the treatment course, drug was not administered on the day it was due in the presence of leukopenia (<3000/ml) and/or diarrhea. Results: The planned administration was completed in 5 of 6 patients at level 1, 6 of 12 patients at level 2, and 2 of 6 patients at level 3. The most common toxicity observed was leukopenia (five patients with grade 3 and one patient with grade 4). Leukopenia was considered to be a DLT, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was level 2. Although there were patients who suffered from diarrhea (four patients with higher than grade 2), diarrhea was judged not to be a DLT with this weekly regimen. Nausea and vomiting were mild. Pharmacokinetic analysis of free platinum from CDDP demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) from 33 mg/m² CDDP was 0.92 ± 0.29 g/ml h. In 13 patients evaluated for response, the response rate was 54%. Conclusion: The value of weekly administration of CDDP in combination with CPT-11 was shown by (1) diarrhea not being dose-limiting, (2) mild nausea, (3) well-maintained AUC of free platinum, and (4) promising activity. Received: 4 April 1997 / Accepted: 8 October 1997     

Mitomycin C, vindesine, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase II study.

Between August 1985 and June 1986, 49 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with the combination of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, and mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating after an interval of 4 weeks, and thereafter every 6 weeks. The median age for all patients was 62 years, with a range of 21 to 77 years. All patients had a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (ECOG scale) and measurable disease. Histologic types included squamous cell carcinoma (22 patients), adenocarcinoma (22 patients), and large-cell carcinoma (6 patients). Forty-eight patients were evaluable for response. Out of 48 patients, one (2%) achieved a complete response and 24 patients (50%) achieved a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 52% (95% confidence interval, 38-68%). The response rates were 52% for squamous cell carcinoma, 45% for adenocarcinoma, and 80% for large-cell carcinoma, respectively. The median duration of response was 4.2 months and the median duration of survival for all patients was 10.6 months. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 85% and 33%, respectively. One patient died of sepsis associated with leukopenia. Other toxicities were manageable and reversible. In conclusion, the MVP regimen was active and tolerable in patients with advanced NSCLC. Prospective randomized study comparing the MVP regimen with the two-drug combination of vindesine and cisplatin is warranted.     

Ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide combination in locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

From March 1993 to February 1997, 43 eligible patients with inoperable stage IIIA (ten patients) and stage IIIB (33 patients), histologically confirmed NSCLC received 3 courses of the ICE combination (ifosfamide 1.5 g m(-2) and mesna 750 mg m(-2) two times a day, cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) and etoposide 100 mg m(-2), all administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3 every 3 weeks) with G-CSF support. After three cycles, patients were submitted to radical surgery or received two additional courses of the ICE regimen and/or curative radiotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21% of 114 evaluable courses, but was of short duration, leading to neutropenic fever in 5% of the courses. Severe thrombocytopenia and anaemia were observed in 13% and 3% of the courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild with only two episodes of reversible renal impairment. The overall response rate after three chemotherapy courses was 69% (28 partial responses, one complete response). Ten patients (8/10 patients in stage IIIA, 2/33 patients in stage IIIB) underwent radical surgery. Median TTP for patients not undergoing surgery (n = 33) was 8 months (range 3-34+); median DFS for patients rendered NED by surgery (n = 10) was 26 months (range 1-54+). Median OS for the entire group was 12.5 months (range 2-57+). The ICE regimen is active in locally advanced NSCLC with acceptable toxicity and warrants further exploration as induction chemotherapy in larger series.     

Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of oral bexarotene in combination with cisplatin and vinorelbine in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is a retinoid-X-receptor (RXR)-selective retinoid with preclinical antitumor activity in squamous cell cancers. In this phase I/II trial, we combined bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients who had stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC and had received no prior therapy received bexarotene in combination with cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (alternating doses of 30 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2). In the phase I portion, the daily dose of bexarotene was escalated in cohorts of three patients from 150 mg/m2 to 600 mg/m2, beginning 1 week before the start of the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of bexarotene was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. Response rate was the primary end point; median survival time and 1-year survival rate were secondary end points. RESULTS: In the phase I portion, the daily MTD of bexarotene was determined to be 400 mg/m2. Eight of 43 patients exhibited major responses. Seven (25%) of the 28 patients in the phase II portion responded to treatment. The median survival time in the phase II portion was 14 months; nine (32%) of the 28 patients were still alive at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. One-year and projected 3-year survival rates were 61% and 30%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hyperlipemia, leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, dyspnea, anemia, and asthenia. Grade 3 and 4 laboratory abnormalities with incidences greater than 5% were decreased hemoglobin levels and WBC, absolute neutrophil, and absolute lymphocyte counts and increased prothrombin time and creatinine and amylase levels. Of the two cases of pancreatitis, one required hospitalization and both were associated with increased triglyceride levels. There was one death secondary to renal insufficiency unrelated to bexarotene treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced NSCLC, bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine yielded acceptable phase II response rates (25%) and was associated with better-than-expected survival (14-month median survival time; 61% 1-year, 32% 2-year, and 30% projected 3-year survival rates). The regimen should be studied in larger clinical trials.     

A phase I study of irinotecan and infusional cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

 A phase I study was performed to establish the optimum dose for combination therapy with infusional cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The subjects were 20 patients with a performance score of 0–2 with untreated advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin was administered by 5-day continuous intravenous infusion at 20–25 mg/m² per day. CPT-11 was administered by bolus infusion at a starting dose of 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 or 60 mg/m² per day on day 1 alone, followed by serial increments of 20 mg/m². Since grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two of the five patients receiving 20 mg/m² per day cisplatin (days 1–5) and 100 mg/m² CPT-11 (day 1), and since one of them developed severe pneumonia and sepsis associated with the granulocytopenia, the regimen was considered to be intolerable. In the same patient, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea were observed. Therefore, the optimum dose appeared to be 20 mg/m² per day (days 1–5) for cisplatin and 80 mg/m² (day 1) for CPT-11. The side effects were grade 2 diarrhea in one of three patients, and grade 2 vomiting in three patients, but grade ≥2 hemotoxicity was not observed. This combined regimen resulted in a partial response in 9 out of 19 assessable patients. The dose-limiting factor in this combination therapy was granulocytopenia, and a high efficacy rate was obtained. Received: 14 August 1995 / Accepted: 3 June 1996