A clinical report on the 18-month cumulative survival rates of implants and implant prostheses with an internal connection implant system

Titanium implants have been successful in both dentulous and edentulous patients. The original Br?nemark titanium implants were introduced with external hex connections between implants and abutments. Successes and failures/complications with both the biology and mechanics of this connection system have been reported. In an attempt to improve the predictability and success of implant/abutment connections, internal connections between implants and abutments were developed significantly differently from external implant/abutment connections in terms of size, surface area, and geometry. Forty-five consecutive partially edentulous patients were treated with 83 implants (Osseotite Certaina). The implants were allowed to heal for at least 8 weeks without occlusal loading. All were restored with single, nonsplinted restorations. The implants were loaded with fully functional occlusions for at least 1 year. Recall appointments were scheduled at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after implant placement. Eighty-two of the 83 implants were clinically stable and considered to be osseointegrated 18 months after occlusal loading for a cumulative survival rate (CSR) (implants) of 100%. All of the abutment screws and restorations were non-mobile 18 months after occlusal loading for a CSR (prostheses) of 100%. This internal implant/abutment connection was clinically successful and should benefit restorative dentists involved in implant dentistry by decreasing the number of maintenance visits and problems associated with dental implant treatment.     

48-month clinical evaluation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomised clinical trial

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of copper nanoparticles (CuNp) on the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system used as an etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategy.MethodsA total of 216 class V (non-carious lesions) restorations were randomly placed in 36 subjects according to the following groups: ERcu, adhesive in etch-and-rinse with 0.1% CuNp; ERct, adhesive in etch-and-rinse without CuNp; SEcu, adhesive in self-etch with 0.1% CuNp; and Sect, adhesive in self-etch without CuNp. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 36, and 48 months, using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed (α = 0.05).ResultsAfter 48 months, 14 restorations were lost (two for ERcu, five for SEcu, and seven for SEct) and the retention rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 74.1% for ERcu (95% CI 61.1–83.8); 81.5% for ERct (95% CI 69.2–89.6); 64.8% (95% CI 51.5–76.2) for SEcu; and 64.8% (95% CI 51.5–76.2) for SEct, with statistical differences between SEct vs. ERct and SEcu vs. ERct (p < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed when the secondary parameters were evaluated (p > 0.05). Nineteen restorations (two for ERcu, two for ERct, six for SEcu, and nine for SEct) showed minor marginal staining, and 44 restorations (7 for ERcu, 8 for ERct, 14 for SEcu, and 15 for SEct) presented minimal marginal adaptation defects.SignificanceThis is the first long-term clinical trial to show that the addition of CuNp to a universal adhesive system does not affect clinical performance.     

Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The subject of immediate loading of dental implants has received substantial attention, although it appears to conflict with the basic principles of dental implant therapies developed and established over the past 20 years. Clinicians would welcome the use of a reliable, immediate-loading implant system. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an expandable implant design for immediate and delayed loading and for freestanding and multiunit situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-six immediate-load Sargon implants were placed in 75 patients during a 40-month period. Of the 273 implants that survived, 81 were placed into fresh extraction sockets and immediately loaded, 162 were placed into healed sites and immediately loaded, and 30 were delay loaded. Some implants that had failed to remain stable after immediate loading became stable and osseointegrated after the load was removed and their expansion mechanisms were reactivated. RESULTS: The overall survival rate during the 40-month period was 96.0% in the maxilla and 94.8% in the mandible. Implants placed in fresh extraction sockets showed a 98.9% survival rate. Healed sites showed a 93.9% survival rate. Immediate loading of 52 fresh extraction socket implants in the maxilla showed a 100% survival rate during the evaluation period. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it was shown that the feature of mechanical expandability may provide operators some control over implant stability during the vulnerable period after immediate loading of single, freestanding implants.     

Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation

Compomers are defined as polyacid-modified resin composites. They are supposed to combine the advantages of traditional glass-ionomer cements with resin composites. This study clinically evaluated a compomer in cervical cavities. Sixty cervical cavities in premolars and molars (24 with cervical caries and 36 with abrasions) randomly divided into two groups of 30 teeth (Group 1 and Group 2) were restored with Dyract (DeTrey-Dentsply, York, PA 17405-0872). The cavities of Group 2 were etched for 30 seconds with orthophosphoric acid before compomer application, while the Group 1 cavities received no treatment. All the restorations were evaluated every six months, up to 48 months: characteristics assessed according to USPHS-modified standards were retention, secondary caries, post-operative sensitivity, marginal adaptation and discoloration, color and wear. The Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis was performed. In both groups, retention was high without any statistically significant difference. No difference was found between the two groups for caries, post-operative sensitivity and wear--that all had a low incidence. Color was not perfectly matched, however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Marginal discoloration and marginal adaptation loss were significantly higher in non-etched group (p < 0.05). Clinically relevant failure required 17.2% of restorations in the non-etched group and 10% in the etched group to be replaced: this difference was not statistically significant. Dyract has an acceptable clinical behavior when used in cervical cavities. Its marginal adaptation is enhanced by etching.     

Comparison between flapless-guided and conventional surgery for implant placement: a 12-month randomized clinical trial

Objectives

The study was aimed at comparing implants installed with guided and conventional surgery.

Material and methods

Twenty-nine total edentulous patients were selected, and maxillary contralateral quadrants were randomly assigned to static computer-aided implant surgery (S-CAIS): flapless computer-guided surgery, and conventional surgery (CS): flap surgery with conventional planning. Tomography scans were performed at baseline and 10 days after the surgery for deviation measurement, and radiography was done at baseline and after 6 and 12 months, for peri-implant bone level (PIBL) analysis. Peri-implant fluid and subgingival biofilm were collected to evaluate bone markers and periodontal pathogens.

Results

S-CAIS showed less linear deviation at the apical point and the midpoint and less angular deviation (p < 0.05), with greater depth discrepancy in the positioning of the platform (p < 0.05). Higher values of vertical PIBL were observed for the S-CAIS group at baseline (p < 0.05), while lower values of horizontal PIBL were observed for CS (p < 0.05). Bone markers and Tf presented higher levels in CS (p < 0.05). Flapless S-CAIS allowed smaller linear and angular deviations than the conventional technique.

Conclusion

However, PIBL was higher in S-CAIS; the conventional technique led to a greater angiogenic and bone remodeling activity by elevating the angiogenic levels and bone markers.

Clinical relevance

Evaluating the different implant insertion techniques can guide clinical and surgical regarding the accuracy, the release pattern of bone markers, and the peri-implant bone level.

Trial registration

ReBEC-RBR-8556fzp.

     

Survival and success rates of immediately and early loaded implants: 12-month results from a multicentric randomized clinical study

Our objective was to compare survival and peri-implant bone levels of immediately nonocclusally vs early loaded implants in partially edentulous patients up to 12 months after implant placement. Eighty patients (inclusion criteria: general good health, good oral hygiene, 30-65 years old; exclusion criteria: head and neck irradiation/cancer, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes, substance abuse, bruxism, lack of opposing occluding dentition, smokers >10 cigarettes/day, need for bone augmentation procedures) were selected in 5 Italian study centers and randomized into 2 groups: 40 patients in the immediately loaded group (minimal insertion torque 30 Ncm) and 40 patients in the early loaded group. Immediately loaded implants were provided with nonoccluding temporary restorations. Final restorations were provided 2 months later. Early loaded implants were provided with a definitive restoration after 2 months. Peri-implant bone resorption was evaluated radiographically with software (ImageJ 1.42). No dropout occurred. Both groups gradually lost peri-implant bone. After 12 months, patients of both groups lost an average of 0.4 mm of peri-implant bone. There were no statistically significant differences (evaluated with t test) between the 2 loading strategies for peri-implant bone level changes at 2 (P = .6730), 6 (P = .6613) and 12 (P = .5957) months or for survival rates (100% in both groups). If adequate primary stability is achieved, immediate loading of dental implants can provide similar success rates, survival rates, and peri-implant bone resorption as compared with early loading, as evaluated in the present study.     

当代牙种植体设计进步与临床意义

牙种植体本身的研发设计进展深刻的影响了临床技术的进步,也深刻的影响了临床治疗效果,甚至给临床治疗理念或流程带来里程碑式的变革。当代牙种植体的设计与临床进步主要表现为：1）种植体根方设计影响了即刻种植的初期稳定性,即刻种植时植入超出牙槽窝上方约3~5 mm的种植体部分的外形结构决定了该种植体的初期稳定性,其外形结构主要体现在种植体根方轮廓设计、螺纹设计及自攻性方面。2）种植体的外形结构设计影响了即刻修复的可能性,即刻修复的基础在尚无骨结合时种植体通过其机械设计可以获得大于35 Ncm的初期稳定性。 微锥度种植体外形,密集型深螺纹,含有良好的自攻刃设计均有利于机械锚定,即初期稳定性,这是即刻修复的物理学基础与机械可能性。3）种植体颈部设计影响美学效果,为了避免拔牙窝唇颊侧骨板吸收显露种植体颈部的金属暗影,均应避免使用颈部膨大设计的种植体,而应采用小直径种植体以利于美学修复美学区域进行种植修复,最好具有平台转移的设计,以获得良好的美学效果。4）种植体与基台的连接设计是骨内种植体设计的关键环节,功能上除了连接种植体与修复体,抗旋转外还需要抵抗或传导各个方向的咀嚼力,连接方式的稳定性会直接影响种植体颈部骨组织的长期稳定性,锥度连接和管套管连接方式都是有良好记录的种植体连接方式。5）平台转移设计影响到种植体颈部骨组织的稳定性,国际上大量临床研究结果及笔者所在科室应用均认为,具有平台转移设计的种植体有利于保存种植体颈部骨组织,无论是在单牙修复还是在多牙或无牙颌种植修复中都表现出良好的种植体颈部骨组织稳定性。6）数字化技术为种植临床技术提供了更为精确,更为高效的高科技方式。应用数字化印模技术结合计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制作软件及专用设备进行修复体的设计、制作将成为未来种植修复的发展趋势。种植体及其配件的持续研发为临床数字化技术提供了可能性,新一代椅旁数字化系统口内扫描前无需喷粉,免除了即刻种植后伤口由喷粉致感染的潜在风险,解决了即刻种植术后即刻扫描的技术难题。7）种植体基台的特殊设计以满足临床新技术创新发展的需求,推进了临床流程的显著变革。All-on-four即刻修复技术和Weldone口内焊接即刻修复技术的问世都是新型特殊修复基台研发突破进而推动了临床新技术的创新。     

A prospective multicenter clinical investigation of a bone quality-based dental implant system

This article reports the 5-year interim results of an independently monitored, prospective, multicenter clinical trial of a bone quality-based implant design. At six study centers, 495 implants were placed in 151 cases with an average follow-up period of 1.6 years (range: 1.0-3.6 years) after prosthesis delivery. The majority of the implants were placed in D2 or D3 bone to support fixed partial dentures or implant-supported overdentures. Using strict success criteria, there were three implant failures, resulting in a cumulative 99.5% success rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Radiographic analysis revealed a mean bone loss of 0.06 mm at 1 year and a bone gain of 0.04 mm at 2 years after prosthesis loading. There were no statistical differences in the results by center, implant type, bone density, area of the mouth, or prosthesis type. The results of this 5-year study revealed a high success rate and limited crestal bone loss in all bone densities by the use of an implant specifically designed for the varying biomechanical conditions and bone quality associated with the human maxilla and mandible.     

Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up

PURPOSE: This article provides preliminary clinical results on the Osseotite NT implant, which was developed to simplify surgical procedure and cover an extended range of indications. Placement characteristics of NT and standard Osseotite implants were also compared in an in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The in vitro placement characteristics of NT and standard Osseotite implants of 4.0 mm diameter and 8.5 to 15 mm in length were compared. In addition, a total of 182 NT implants (96 maxillary and 86 mandibular) were placed in 92 patients; of these, 87.9% were placed using a 1-stage technique. The implants were placed in healed sites (43.9%), fresh extraction sockets (37.4%), or recent extraction sites (2 months postextraction) (18.7%). Before restoration, healing times of 3 to 4 months in the mandible and 5 to 6 months in the maxilla were allowed. The entered implant length in the osteotomy site before contacting the bony walls (EILOS) was compared, as well as the number of turns and the time required to seat the implants. Cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were calculated for up to 18 months of follow-up after surgery. RESULTS: The EILOS was between 47.3% and 57.6% of implant length for the NT implants; for the standard implants, it was between 12.0% and 21.2%. With the NT implants, the number of turns and the placement time were reduced by 61% to 64% and 61% to 65%, respectively. In the clinical study, 4 implants failed during the healing period; none failed after prosthesis placement. The CSR was 97.79% for implants placed into fresh or recent extraction sites; in healed sites, the CSR was 98.75%. The cumulative prosthetic success rate was 100%. DISCUSSION: This new implant design is seated with special drills; the drilling sequence requires less time and less torque than that used for standard implants. The low failure rate after prosthetic loading was consistent with that observed for standard Osseotite implants. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that the NT implant can be predictable in healed sites and fresh or relatively recent extraction sockets.     

Incidence of endodontic treatment: a 48-month prospective study

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of endodontic services provided to participants in a longitudinal cohort study. The "Florida Dental Care Study" was a prospective cohort study using a representative baseline sample of 873 dentate adults. An in-person interview and clinical dental exam were conducted at baseline, 24, and 48 months after baseline, with telephone interviews every 6 months between those times. Dental record information was abstracted afterward. Thirteen percent of participants received at least one endodontic procedure after baseline. Endodontic services constituted approximately 2% of all dental procedures performed. Conventional root canal therapy comprised 94% of the endodontic services and was approximately evenly distributed among anterior teeth, premolars, and molars. Retreatment and apicoectomy each accounted for 3% of the endodontic procedures. The most common self-reported reasons for the dental visit in which a root canal occurred were "toothache," "abscess," and "dental sensitivity." A significant percentage of persons received some type of endodontic treatment in this diverse adult sample. Dental abscesses or toothaches were the main reason(s) for endodontic treatment, but not all persons with these conditions during follow-up sought dental treatment of any variety.     

Tooth preservation or implant placement: A systematic review of long-term tooth and implant survival rates

BackgroundFor the past few decades, dental implants have served as reliable replacements for missing teeth. However, there is an increasing trend toward replacing diseased teeth with dental implants.Types of Studies ReviewedThe authors conducted a systematic review of long-term survival rates of teeth and implants. They searched the MEDLINE database for relevant publications up to March 2013. They considered studies in which investigators assessed the long-term effectiveness of dental implants or that of tooth preservation. They included only studies that had follow-up periods of 15 years or longer.ResultsThe authors selected 19 articles for inclusion. Investigators in nine studies assessed the tooth survival rate, whereas investigators in 10 studies assessed the implant survival rate. When comparing the overall long-term (that is, 15 years or more) tooth loss rate with that of implants, the authors observed rates ranging between 3.6 and 13.4 percent and 0 and 33 percent for teeth and implants, respectively. They could not perform a meta-analysis because of the substantial differences between the studies.Practical ImplicationsThe results of this systematic review show that implant survival rates do not exceed those of compromised but adequately treated and maintained teeth, supporting the notion that the decision to extract a tooth and place a dental implant should be made cautiously. Even when a tooth seems to be compromised and requires treatment to be maintained, implant treatment also might require additional surgical procedures that might pose some risks as well. Furthermore, a tooth can be extracted and replaced at any time; however, extraction is a definitive and irreversible treatment.     

Retrofitting implant overdenture attachments: A clinical report

The remake of implant-overdenture prostheses on preexisting implants can present the clinician with a challenge, especially when the prosthetic components used initially cannot be replaced. The difficulty of remaking the prosthesis may be further increased by implant attachments designed to be cemented to the implant itself--a feature that complicates future replacement. This clinical report describes the restoration of worn implant attachments using retrofit components.     

A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report

PURPOSE: This study compares implant survival and patterns of implant failure in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a private periodontal practice, over a 13-year period, implants were placed in both periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients. Implants were classified in 5 different groups according to surface texture. Survival rates in each group were compared according to implant location, diameter, length, and phase of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1,511 implants were placed in 334 patients. One hundred fifty-one of these patients, classified as periodontally compromised patients (PCP), received 923 implants. The remaining 183 patients, classified as periodontally healthy patients (PHP), received 588 implants. The overall survival rate for implants placed in the PHP group was 93.7%, compared to 90.6% in the PCP group. The survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated implants was 92.6% in the PHP group and 81% in the PCP group. The survival rate of the turned-surface implants was similar in both groups. DISCUSSION: Two types of implant failure were identified. The first was failure of the implant to osseointegrate. This type of failure occurred early in treatment and appeared to be related to smooth-surface implants placed in bone of low density. Failures of this type were distributed equally between the PHP and PCP groups. The second type of failure was related to peri-implantitis. It was observed most often with implants with hydroxyapatite surfaces, occurred as the result of a progressive condition, and was most prevalent in the PCP group. CONCLUSION: Further long-term controlled investigations are needed to determine the influences of implant suface and host susceptibility on implant failure in both PHP and PCP.     

Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: A clinical report

Harmony among the teeth, lips, and facial components is the goal of prosthodontic treatment, whether performed by conventional or digital workflow methods. This clinical report describes a facial approach to planning computer-guided surgery and immediate computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) interim complete-arch fixed dental prostheses on immediately placed dental implants with a digital workflow. A single clinical appointment for data collection included dentofacial documentation with photographs and videos. On these photographs, facial reference lines were drawn to create a smile frame. This digital smile design and sagittal cephalometric analysis were merged with 3-dimensional scanned casts and a cone beam computed tomographic file in virtual planning software, thus guiding virtual waxing and implant positioning. Computer-guided implant surgery and CAD-CAM interim dental prostheses allowed esthetic and functional rehabilitation in a predictable manner and integrated with the patient’s face.     

A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study

PURPOSE

To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations.

RESULTS

For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect).