Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using the tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type)

Background: Although the strip biopsy method and aspiration method are popular endoscopic mucosal resection techniques for its convenience and reliability, they have limitations in resectable tumor size and location. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques using the diathermic needle knife or the insulated‐tip diathermic knife have been introduced to overcome this disadvantage, but they have high risks for bleeding and perforation. Therefore, we have developed a new endoscopic submucosal dissection technique using the tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type) and assessed its efficacy. Methods: Fifty‐nine lesions with differentiated‐type gastric cancer without ulceration were treated with our technique at the University Hospital. The tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type) was used for mucosal incision and submucosal dissection as a flexible diathermic knife. Results: The size of tumor was 5–85 mm in diameter (mean size: 29 mm) and the location varied from cardia to antrum. Among 59 lesions, 56 lesions (56/59, 95%) were resected completely in an en‐bloc fashion with much less perforation (2/59, 3.4%) and bleeding (1/59, 1.7%) regardless of their size and location. Conclusion: New endoscopic submucosal dissection technique using the tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type) is safe and reliable. We were able to resect early gastric cancer with a much higher en‐bloc resection rate and fewer complications using this technique.     

Management of bleeding and artificial gastric ulcers associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), an endoscopic procedure for the treatment of gastric epithelial neoplasia without lymph node metastases, spread rapidly, primarily in Japan, starting in the late 1990s. ESD enables en bloc resection of lesions that are difficult to resect using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, in comparison to EMR, ESD requires a high level of endoscopic competence and a longer resection time. Thus, ESD is associated with a higher risk of adverse events, including intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and gastrointestinal perforation. In particular, because of a higher incidence of intraoperative bleeding with mucosal incision and submucosal dissection, which are distinctive endoscopic procedures in ESD, a strategy for endoscopic hemostasis, mainly by thermo-coagulation hemostasis using hemostatic forceps, is important. In addition, because of iatrogenic artificial ulcers that always form after ESD, endoscopic hemostasis and appropriate pharma-cotherapy during the healing process are essential.     

Key factors for successful en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of early stage gastric cancer using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife

BACKGROUND/AIMS: En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is presently considered to be the treatment of choice for endoscopically resectable early stage gastric cancer (EGC). Although a new EMR technique using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife (endoscopic submucosal dissection using an IT knife: IT knife-ESD) is reportedly suitable for en bloc resection, a failure in en bloc resection (piecemeal resection) can occur. We retrospectively analyzed factors affecting the success rate of en bloc resection by IT knife-ESD. METHODOLOGY: A total of 71 gastric lesions were treated by IT knife-ESD. En bloc/piecemeal resection rates were investigated. Twelve potential factors associated with clinicopathological characteristics or procedures were analyzed univariately and multivariately. RESULTS: IT knife-ESD was successfully performed in all 71 lesions. En bloc resection was achieved in 63 lesions (91%), while eight lesions (9%) were removed as two or more fragments (piecemeal resection). The multivariate analysis identified only one independent factor affecting the success rate of en bloc resection: the second-half period of procedure application. The en bloc resection rate was not associated with the tumor location/site, tumor size, specimen size, and ulceration within the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Much experience with IT knife-ESD may resolve the tumor-related technical difficulties. It is true for this advanced procedure that endoscopist experience is highly likely to be a critical factor for treatment success. We consider that IT knife-ESD for EGC is feasible and safe when performed by experienced endoscopists.     

A new breakthrough: ESD using a newly developed grasping type scissor forceps for early gastrointestinal tract neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has allowed the achievement of histologically curative en bloc resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms regardless of size, permitting the resection of previously non-resectable tumors. The ESD technique for treatment of early gastric cancer has spread rapidly in Japan and a few other Asian countries due to its excellent eradication rate compared to endoscopic mucosal resection. Although numerous electrosurgical knives have been developed for ESD, technical difficulties and high complication rates (bleeding and perforation) have limited their use worldwide. We developed the grasping type scissor forceps (GSF) to resolve such ESD-related problems. Our animal and preliminary clinical studies showed that ESD using GSF is a safe (no intraoperative complication) and technically efficient (curative en bloc resection rate 92%) method for dissection of early gastrointestinal tumors. The use of GSF is a promising option for performing ESD on early stage GI tract tumors both safely and effectively.     

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating early gastric cancer: Comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting (EMR-P)

BackgroundTo achieve en bloc resection for large lesions, endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting and endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques have been developed.AimTo compare endoscopic submucosal dissection with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting in terms of the clinical efficacy and safety.Patients and methods346 consecutive patients underwent their first endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting (103 patients) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (243 patients) for early gastric cancer and their clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsFor early gastric cancer ≥20 mm endoscopic submucosal dissection group demonstrated significantly higher en bloc resection and en bloc plus R0 resection rate compared with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting group. For early gastric cancer with size of 10–19 mm, endoscopic submucosal dissection group also showed significantly higher en bloc resection rate. For early gastric cancer <20 mm, however, en bloc plus R0 resection rate for endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting group was comparable to that for endoscopic submucosal dissection group. In case of R0 resection of intramucosal differentiated cancer, neither group showed local recurrence during the median 29 and 17 months of follow-up. Two groups did not show significant difference in the bleeding or perforation rates.ConclusionFor early gastric cancer <20 mm endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting may be considered as an alternative choice to endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, for early gastric cancer ≥20 mm endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered as the first choice for treating early gastric cancer.     

Efficacy of scissor-type knives for endoscopic mucosal dissection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms has become widespread. However, certain aspects of the procedure remain difficult to manage, such as intraoperative bleeding and perforation. There are two kinds of scissor-type knife: the Clutch Cutter (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan) and the SB knife (Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Tokyo, Japan). These knives have different features from other types of ESD knives and enable the performance of all ESD procedures, including mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and hemostasis. The standard approach with scissor-type knives involves first grabbing the tissue and then incising or dissecting it. Theoretically, perforation as a result of unintentional movement should never happen with scissor-type knives compared to needle- or blade-type knives, which may induce perforation through unintentional movement. Moreover, the rates of severe bleeding and self-completion of ESD with scissor-type knives by non-experts were reported to be significantly better than for other knives. Thus, scissor-type knives can resolve these problems and help to further standardize ESD globally. In this review, we summarize reports on the efficacy of such scissor-type knives for ESD of gastrointestinal tumors. We also present the pocket-creation method and the application of traction devices, such as dental floss and S-O clips (Zeon Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) for improving the performance of ESD with a Clutch Cutter.     

Clinical outcome of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy for early stage gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established treatment option for early stage gastric cancer. However, several problems with endoscopic mucosal resection remain to be solved, such as appropriate treatment for recurrence and incomplete tumor resection. The outcome for patients undergoing endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (endoscopic mucosal resection) by a modification of the cap-fitted technique was evaluated retrospectively to determine factors associated with complete resection and tumor recurrence. METHODS: Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 106 patients with early stage gastric cancers up to 20 mm in diameter that were well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. All were superficial lesions without ulceration, distinct signs of submucosal invasion, or a poorly demarcated border. En bloc (tumors <10 mm in diameter) or piecemeal (tumors 10-20 mm in diameter) resection was performed. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and thereafter once per year. Outcome and factors associated with complete resection and tumor recurrence were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (64%) underwent en bloc resection and 38 (36%) piecemeal resection. The mean longest dimension (SD) of the resected lesions was significantly greater after piecemeal resection (12.3 [4.0] mm) than after en bloc resection (7.6 [4.0] mm; p < 0.01). In patients with tumors completely resected, there was no recurrence after either en bloc or piecemeal resection. Six of 8 patients found to have submucosal invasion after endoscopic mucosal resection underwent surgery. Patients with incompletely resected intramucosal lesions underwent additional endoscopic treatment. Cancer recurred in 3 patients (2.8%), all of whom had lesions measuring more than 15 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection is safe and useful for the management of early stage gastric cancer. Further improvement in outcome requires more accurate preoperative diagnosis and postoperative histopathologic evaluation. Patients with incompletely resected lesions should undergo aggressive additional treatment.     

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer

Opinion statement Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoscopic treatment that enables a clinician to resect an early-stage gastric cancer in en bloc fashion. ESD is indicated for those cancers in which there is a high probability of en bloc resection and low probability of lymph node metastasis. The latter may be the limiting factor at institutions skilled at ESD. Several ESD techniques are available with similar outcomes. Thus, selection depends on operator preference and expertise. Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy should be applied initially to those early gastric cancers with high probability of positive lymph nodes or as an additional treatment after ESD. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) should be reserved for small, nonulcerated, intramucosal, differentiated cancers. Disadvantages of ESD in comparison with EMR are longer operation times and higher incidences of intraoperative bleeding and perforation, but the indication for ESD includes larger and ulcerative lesions not amenable to EMR.     

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms using a snare tip

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the complete removal of gastric lesions regardless of tumor size. ESD is typically performed using one of several available electrocautery knives and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is performed using a diathermic snare. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and complications in patients in whom a snare tip was used for ESD.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 30 patients who underwent removal of a gastric lesion using a snare tip by ESD or hybrid ESD (ESD with snaring). For hybrid ESD, snaring was performed after an adequate submucosal dissection. The clinical outcomes according to the endoscopic procedure performed were evaluated.

Results: ESD was performed in 12 patients and hybrid ESD was performed in 26 patients. Overall en-bloc and complete resection rates were both 97.4%. There was one case where piece-meal resection was performed in the hybrid ESD group. There were no procedure related complications such as perforation or bleeding. The mean specimen size was 2.8?±?0.6?cm in the ESD group and 2.3?±?0.5?cm in the hybrid ESD group (p?=?.031). The mean procedure time did not differ between the two methods (12.8?min in ESD and 9.7?min in hybrid ESD, p?=?.060).

Conclusions: The snare tip can be used as an electrocautery knife to incise the mucosa and dissect the submucosa during removal of a gastric lesion.     

Management of complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer

Endoscopic treatment should be considered for early gastric cancer(EGC)and gastric precancerous lesions.Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)was developed for en bloc removal of a large gastric neoplasm and has been developed following improvements in electrical equipment for hemostasis and dissection and with advances in various knives,hemostatic forceps and endoscopic equipment.ESD is currently the treatment of choice for precancerous lesions or EGC showing mucosal invasion.Hemorrhage and perforation are major complications of ESD for EGC.We describe the complication of ESD procedures in gastric lesions for endoscopists who are relatively inexperienced in ESD and who may lack optimal access to ESD education and facilities.     

NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION USING AN EXTERNAL GRASPING FORCEPS FOR SUPERFICIAL GASTRIC NEOPLASIA

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early stage gastric cancer (EGC) has improved the success rate of en bloc resection but results in perforation more often than does endoscopic mucosal resection. We report a novel technique of ESD using an external grasping forceps. A total of 265 lesions with EGC or gastric adenoma were enrolled in this study. Sixteen lesions were located in the upper third portion of the stomach, 114 in the middle third portion, and 135 in the lower third portion. After submucosal injection followed by circumcision of the lesions with a flex knife, the external grasping forceps was introduced with the help of a second grasping forceps and anchored at the margin of the lesion. Oral traction applied with this forceps could elevate the lesion and make the submucosal layer wider and more visible, thereby facilitating dissection of the submucosal layer under direct vision. The mean lesion size was 15.0 mm (range: 5–50 mm). All but 11 lesions (95.8%) could be resected en bloc with free margins. Mean procedure time was 45 min (range: 20–180 min). It was difficult to carry out this procedure when the lesions were located in the cardia, lesser curvature, or posterior wall of the upper third of the gastric body. Bleeding after ESD occurred in 10 patients (3.8%) and perforation occurred in one patient (0.4%). The endoscopic submucosal dissection using an external grasping forceps for superficial gastric neoplasia is efficacious and safe.     

High en bloc resection rate achieved by endoscopic mucosal resection with IT knife for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) around lesions performed by an insulation-tipped diathermic knife (IT knife) increases en bloc resection rates, suggesting the possibility of expanding indications for EMR. METHODOLOGY: Clinical outcome of EMR performed by IT knife under general anesthesia was evaluated for 26 patients with 29 early gastric cancer. RESULTS: Successful en bloc resection rates obtained by the IT knife were 100, 87.5, 90.0 and 100% for lesions < or =10 mm in size, 11-20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > or =31 mm, respectively. They were significantly higher with the IT knife than those obtained by the conventional method (IT knife method: 93.1% vs. conventional method: 28.5%, p<0.0001). Two lesions were lateral margin positive, and in three cases invasion of lesions was observed as deep as the submucosa. Distal, total, and proximal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, respectively, was provided in 3 cases; however, no lymph node involvement was found in any of the resected specimens. Bleeding and perforation were observed in 3 cases, respectively, however, no additional surgical treatment was required for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: EMR by means of the IT knife under general anesthesia can be performed safely and adequately. It is a useful treatment modality for early gastric cancer.     

Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions: Advancement in the application of endoscopic submucosal dissection

Curative endoscopic resection is now a viable option for a range of neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) with low invasive potential. Risk of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in selecting appropriate lesions for endoscopic therapy, and assessment of invasion depth is vital in this respect. To determine appropriate treatment, detailed endoscopic diagnosis and estimation of depth using magnifying chromoendoscopy is the gold standard in Japan. En bloc resection is the most desirable endoscopic therapy as risk of local recurrence is low and accurate histological diagnosis of invasion depth is possible. Endoscopic mucosal resection is established worldwide for the ablation of early neoplasms, but en bloc removal using this technique is limited to small lesions. Evidence suggests that a piecemeal resection technique has a higher local recurrence risk, therefore necessitating repeated surveillance endoscopy and further therapy. More advanced endoscopic techniques developed in Japan allow effective en bloc removal of early GIT neoplasms, regardless of size. This review discusses assessment of GIT lesions and options for endoscopic therapy with special reference to the introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection into Western countries.     

Rectal laterally spreading tumors successfully treated in two steps by endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection

Background  

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced technique of therapeutic endoscopy alternative to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms >2 cm. ESD allows for the direct dissection of the submucosa and large lesions can be resected en bloc. ESD is not limited by resection size, increases histologically complete resection rates and may reduce the local recurrence.     

Usefulness and safety of 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution as a submucosal fluid "cushion" in endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Sodium hyaluronate (SH) solution has been used for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection to create a long-lasting submucosal fluid "cushion." OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to assess the usefulness and safety of 0.4% SH solution in endoscopic resection. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Six referral hospitals in Japan. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients with 5- to 20-mm gastric intramucosal neoplastic lesions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into 0.4% SH and control groups. Endoscopic resection was performed with 0.4% SH or normal saline solution for submucosal injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measure: The usefulness of 0.4% SH solution was assessed by en bloc complete resection and the formation and maintenance of mucosal lesion-lifting during endoscopic resection. Secondary outcome measures: (1) steepness of mucosal lesion lifting, (2) complications, (3) time required for mucosal resection, (4) volume of submucosal injection solution, and (5) ease of mucosal resection. Safety was assessed by analyzing adverse events during the study period. RESULTS: The usefulness rate was significantly higher for the 0.4% SH group (88.4%, 61/69) than for the control group (58.6%, 41/70). As secondary outcome measures, significant intergroup differences (P < .001) were noted for (1) steepness of mucosal lesion lifting, (2) volume of submucosal injection solution, and (3) ease of mucosal resection. No serious adverse events were encountered in either group. LIMITATIONS: Lack of blinding. Safety was not a powered outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Using 0.4% SH as a submucosal injection solution in endoscopic resection enabled the formation and maintenance of sufficient mucosal lesion lifting for gastric intramucosal lesions, reducing the need for additional injections and simplifying mucosal resection. Use of 0.4% SH thus simplifies the complicated procedures involved in endoscopic resection.     

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of stomach neoplasms after unsuccessful endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a novel endoluminal endoscopic surgery that enables resection of pre-malignant and early-stage malignant gastrointestinal neoplasms in an en bloc fashion. AIM: To assess the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection of stomach neoplasms with submucosal fibrosis caused by unsuccessful endoscopic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stomach endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed in ten consecutive patients who had unsuccessful endoscopic tumour resection at another hospital between 2003 and 2006. Seven patients had recurrent tumours after complete endoscopic resection, and three patients had incomplete resections due to complications or technical difficulties. Technical feasibility and follow-up data were collected from the patients' reports. RESULTS: All tumours were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection in one piece without complications. R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumour-free margins) was achieved in nine patients (90%). One patient received additional surgery (gastrectomy) because of submucosal deep invasion with vascular infiltration of the cancer. All patients, including the patient with gastrectomy, have survived without recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 21.4 months (range 3-36 months). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe method for resection of stomach neoplasms after unsuccessful endoscopic resection.     

Current opinions for endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors from our experiences: indications, technical aspects and complications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was first applied in the resection of large colorectal tumors 10 years ago. Frequent complications and technical difficulties were serious problems at first, but were gradually improved with experience. Here, we describe the indications, technical aspects and management of complications of ESD for colorectal tumors. In 2009, we introduce the use of small tip insulation-tipped diathermic (IT) knife. Features separating it from the IT knife and IT Knife2 are a smaller ceramic tip and small round disk at the root of the tip. During submucosal dissection, the small tip IT knife could dissect large pieces of tissue intact. This allows us to shorten the procedure time, particularly the submucosal dissection component. A total of 146 ESD for 140 patients were performed between January 2009 and July 2011. En bloc, and en bloc and R0 resection rates were 92.5% and 83.6%, respectively. Median procedural time was 48.5 min for 40.5 mm specimens. Perforation and delayed bleeding occurred in 2.1% and 1.4%, respectively. We successfully performed ESD for colorectal tumors with a shortened procedure time while preserving quality and safety.     

Management of local recurrence after endoscopic resection of neoplastic colonic polyps

A proportion of neoplastic polyps are incompletely resected, resulting in local recurrence, especially after resection of large polyps or piecemeal resection. Local recurrences that develop after endoscopic resection of intramucosal neoplasms that lacked risk factors for lymph node metastasis or positive vertical margins are usually treated endoscopically. Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is indicated for local residual or recurrent early carcinomas after endoscopic resection. However, ESD for such recurrent lesions is technically difficult and is typically a lengthy procedure. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR), which was developed in 2012, is suitable for recurrent or residual lesions and reportedly achieves superior en bloc resection rates and endoscopic complete resection rates than conventional EMR. However, a large recurrent lesion is a negative independent predictor of successful en bloc resection and of complete endoscopic removal. We therefore perform UEMR for relatively small(≤ 10-15 mm) recurrent lesions and ESD for larger lesions.     

Early gastric cancer: diagnosis, pathology, treatment techniques and treatment outcomes

Recent improvements in endoscopic techniques and technologies and an increased understanding and recognition of the importance of early gastric cancer (EGC) will result in increases in the detection and diagnosis of precancerous or early cancerous lesions. The incidences of nodal metastasis of intramucosal and submucosal EGC are 3 and 20%, respectively. Therefore, major surgery may be inappropriate in many of these patients, and many cases of EGC may be treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). EMR was first introduced in Japan 20 years ago. Most EMR have been performed by the so-called 'strip biopsy' or EMR-C methods. However, we have sometimes experienced local recurrence in cases that had been resected in multiple fragments by these methods. To obtain 'complete resection', we developed the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique using a special endoscopic knife, the insulation-tipped diathermic knife (IT knife). The rate of complete resection, i.e. cut margin free from cancer and one-piece resection, was remarkably higher for the IT knife technique than conventional EMR. ESD cases are increasing rapidly in Japan. EMR including ESD is a good method for patients with gastric cancer to preserve the stomach. For EMR, it is necessary to find EGC. Both diagnosis and treatment are important, and scientific data regarding lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features are required.