Anemia in the period immediately following renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Anemia remains frequent in the first month following renal transplantation and is a risk factor for cardiovascular accidents. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence of anemia during this period notably among different immunosuppressive treatment groups. METHODS: In this study, we entered the patients who had received a renal allograft in our transplant unit from 1993 to 2003, including patients who had received azathioprine (AZA) from 1993 to 1996 and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from 1996 to 2003. No patient received rHu-erythropoietin after transplantation during that period. A mathematical model normalized the hemoglobin (Hb) threshold level at which blood transfusion was decided and Hb on admission. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight patients on AZA and 223 on MMF were included in the analysis. The mean age +/- SD was 41 +/- 12 years in the AZA group, and 45 +/- 12 years in the MMF group (P < .006). Before the transplantation, Hb was higher in the MMF group (11.4 +/- 1.9 vs 10.2 +/- 2 g/dL, P < .0001). After normalization at a threshold level of transfusion of 7 g/dL, transfusions were more frequent among the MMF group (72% vs 48%, P < .0001). Double therapy with MMF (1500 mg/d) + steroids or therapy with MMF (750 mg/d) + tacrolimus + steroids increased the risk of transfusion compared to the AZA group. MMF (750 mg/d) + cyclosporine conferred a similar risk of transfusion compared with the AZA group. CONCLUSION: MMF alone or in association with tacrolimus is associated with an increased risk of anemia and transfusion in the immediate posttransplantation period.     

Prospective, Pilot, Open-Label, Short-Term Study of Conversion to Leflunomide Reverses Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction

Leflunomide (LEF) is a synthetic isoxazole derivative with anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties, which has been reported to prevent acute rejection and delay progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in animal models. We performed a pilot, crossover trial in 22 renal transplant recipients who were converted from azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to LEF in an effort to slow progression of renal dysfunction [deteriorating renal function (n = 5), cyclosporine (CyA) nephrotoxicity (n = 4) or biopsy-proven CAN (n = 13)]. Baseline maintenance immunosuppression consisted of CyA, AZA or MMF and prednisone. Six-month postconversion patient and graft survival was 100% and 91%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine 6months preconversion was 2.2 +/- 0.6mg/dL, at initiation was 3.0 +/- 1.1 mg/dL, and 6 months postconversion was 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/dL. The rate of change in serum creatinine was 35 +/- 39%/6 months preconversion and -5 +/- 21%/6 months postconversion to LEF (p = 0.003). Two patients discontinued LEF for diarrhea and myalgia. No readmissions, increase in liver function tests, infections or acute rejection episodes occurred. Mean CyA levels did not change, 146 +/- 72 ng/ mL pre-LEF vs. 132 +/- 51 ng/mL post-LEF, p = NS. Conversion to LEF reversed progression of chronic renal allograft dysfunction with minimal toxicity.     

Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera. METHODS: All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred). RESULTS: Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups. CONCLUSION: RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.     

Preliminary experience with mycophenolate mofetil for preservation of renal function in cardiac transplant patients with documented cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CyA) has positively impacted on the outcome of cardiac transplantation; however, the nephrotoxicity associated with CyA has been a major drawback. METHODS: In an effort to reduce exposure to CyA and possibly alleviate its nephrotoxic effects, we undertook a therapeutic strategy to switch cardiac transplant patients with biopsy-proven CyA nephrotoxicity from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with subsequent CyA dose reduction or elimination. RESULTS: MMF was substituted for AZA in five cardiac transplant patients (four males; mean age, 60 +/- 6 years old; average time from transplant was 7 +/- 3 years) who had biopsy proven evidence of CyA nephrotoxicity, and in whom CyA dose was reduced (3/5) or discontinued (2/5). At the time of the therapeutic intervention, four patients had an average serum creatinine of 230 +/- 62 micromol/L and one patient had just been started on haemodialysis (HD). During an average follow-up period of 42 months, the slope of the inverse serum creatinine significantly improved in three patients and continued to deteriorate in one patient. The patient on HD could be transiently taken off HD. However, he developed a severe episode of cardiac rejection requiring antirejection therapy and increase in the dose of CyA. The patient was subsequently returned back on HD. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary report, we show that AZA to MMF switch with subsequent CyA dose reduction or discontinuation may slow down the progression of kidney disease in some patients. However, the patients should be followed closely for evidence of cardiac rejection.     

Effect of sirolimus on the metabolism of apoB100- containing lipoproteins in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, RAPA) is a potent immunosuppressive drug that has reduced the rate of acute rejection episodes by more than 40% in phase III trials when added to an immunosuppression regimen of cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone. However, RAPA treatment tends to increase lipid levels, particularly among patients with pre-existing hyperlipidemia. METHODS: To identify the metabolic pathway(s) leading to RAPA-mediated hyperlipidemia, five patients with renal transplants maintained on CsA+/-prednisone+/- azathioprine (AZA) were studied before and after 6 weeks of treatment with RAPA (off RAPA and on RAPA, respectively). Each study patient was infused with a single bolus of [2H4]-lysine to derive metabolic parameters for apoB100-containing lipoproteins by using kinetic analysis based upon quantitation of isotopic enrichment by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Serial lipid measurements revealed that four patients displayed increased plasma triglyceride levels after RAPA treatment, which coincided with significantly higher plasma VLDL-apoB100 concentrations (21.7+/-12.1 mg/dl off RAPA vs. 38.7+/-14.8 mg/dl on RAPA, mean+/-SD, P<0.05). Kinetic analysis showed that the RAPA-induced increase in VLDL-apoB100 concentrations was due to a significant reduction in the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apoB100 (0.83+/-0.65 off RAPA vs. 0.24+/-0.10 on RAPA, mean+/-SD, P<0.05), rather than an enhanced VLDL-apoB100 synthesis. In one patient, RAPA treatment induced hypercholesterolemia but not hypertriglyceridemia. This hypercholesterolemia was due to elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, which coincided with a decreased FCR of LDL-apoB100. Heparin-induced lipoprotein lipase activity was significantly lower in the immunosuppressed hyperlipidemic patients than in normolipidemic controls. However, RAPA treatment did not significantly alter basal lipoprotein lipase activity in renal transplant patients in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that for renal transplant patients in whom RAPA treatment induces hyperlipidemia, this effect is the result of reduced catabolism of apoB100-containing lipoproteins.     

Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: preliminary report in Chile

The association of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant patients has diminished the incidence of acute rejection. We evaluated the use of generic TAC and MMF as primary immunosuppression in 6 living related (LR) and 11 cadaveric (C) donor renal transplant recipients (9 men, 8 women) of mean age 37 +/- 12 years (range, 17-56 years) between May 2006 and June 2007. From day 0 all patients received TAC, MMF, and prednisone without antibody induction. They were followed for the development of acute rejection, graft loss, side effects, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 2-15 months). No biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, graft loss, or recipient deaths were observed. Creatinine levels at the end of the study were 1.90 +/- 1.0 mg/dL (range, 0.62-4.25 mg/dL for C recipients and 1.19 +/- 0.15 mg/dL (range, 0.91-1.35 mg/dL) for LR recipients. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 130/73 mm Hg with 12 patients (70.5%) on antihypertensive therapy with calcium antagonists and beta-blockers. Mean (range) of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were 172 (110-244) mg/dL, 139 (69-277) mg/dL, and 89 (63-129) mg/dL, respectively. MMF was suspended in 1 patient due to diarrhea and 1 other because of leukopenia. We observed that generic TAC and MMF yielded effective and safe immunosuppression in terms of mortality, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and graft loss with a low incidence of adverse effects during the study period.     

A single center's clinical experience with quadruple immunosuppression including ATG or IL2 antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil in simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplants

Acute rejection remains a major problem in simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplant and occurs in 60–100% of the cases.
With the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) replacing azathioprine (AZA) as a basis immunosuppressant, reduced rates of rejection have been reported. This study investigates the frequency and clinical relevance of allograft rejection in SPK patients receiving anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or Basiliximab® induction therapy and cyclosporine Neoral® (CyA), MMF, steroid basis immunosuppression.
Between December 1996 and October 1999, 21 consecutive patients (15 males, 6 females) received a SPK transplant at our institution with a mean±standard deviation (SD) age of 42±6 yr. Of these, 14 patients were treated with anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) Fresenius® (rabbit) 3–5 mg/kg for 6±2 d, cyclosporine Neoral (CyA) (trough levels 350–400 ng/mL), MMF 3 g/d and low dose steroid therapy. Seven SPK patients were treated with Basiliximab (Simulect®, Novartis 20 mg on d 0 and d 4 post‐transplant) instead of ATG. The patients had an average human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch of 3.9/6 and a negative cross match. All patients remained on triple drug therapy. Three patients were switched to tacrolimus instead of Neoral for CyA intolerance. The mean±SD cold ischemia time (CIT) of the organs was 10.1±2.4 h for the pancreas and 10.5±2.6 h for the kidney.
Results: Biopsy‐proven rejection occurred in the kidney of 1 ATG patient (8%), which responded to steroid bolus therapy. One of the patients (14%) with Basiliximab induction developed renal allograft rejection, which was resolved after a 6‐d course of anti‐CD3 mAb (OKT3) treatment. All patients (100%) were free from rejection in the pancreas, as measured by urine amylase levels and glycemic control without the need for exogenous insulin with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA₁C) of 5.1±0.7% and serum creatinine with a mean of 1.24±0.24 mg/dL in a mean follow‐up period of 17±15 months (median 12, range 2–37).
Conclusion: Triple drug immunosuppression including cyclosporine, MMF and low dose steroids with ATG or interleukin 2 (IL2) receptor antibodies induction therapy appears to be a very suitable immunosuppressive regimen for combined pancreas–kidney transplant (PKT) with a marked reduction in the incidence of rejection.     

Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (ECMPS) has been developed as an alternative agent to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with the aim to provide reduction in gastrointestinal side effects. This open-label, single-arm, two-center prospective study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of ECMPS used in combination with steroid and cyclosporine (CyA) in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients with 12 months' follow-up. Twenty-one patients were recruited (mean age, 39 +/- 8 years) into the de novo group. Of these patients, 66% were male and 76.2% underwent living related kidney donation. The induction immunosuppression was ATG in 10 and basiliximab in 6 patients. At 12 months' posttransplantation, there was no graft or patient loss and two (10%) acute rejection episodes. None of the patients in this group discontinued the study medication due to drug-induced adverse events. One patient was excluded from the study because of recurrent oxalosis. Serum creatinine (SCr) levels at 3, 6, and 12 months after renal transplant were 1.30 +/- 0.3, 1.40 +/- 0.3, and 1.40 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, respectively. The maintenance group included 20 patients. Time posttransplantation (mean +/- SD) was 27 +/- 25 months. All patients in this group had been on maintenance azathioprine or MMF in combination with steroid and CyA. These patients were switched to ECMPS. They mean age was 36 +/- 8 years. Sixty-six percent of the patients were male and 57% received living donor kidneys. Acute rejection was nil, whereas two patients lost their grafts owing to chronic rejection in this group. Three patients were excluded from the study, one to discontinuation of the drug because of intractable diarrhea, the second to loss to follow-up, and the last case due to withdrawal of informed consent. Leukopenia was not observed in this group. The SCr levels prior to and at 3, 6, and 12 months after conversion to ECMPS were 1.80 +/- 1.0, 1.95 +/- 1.5, 1.50 +/- 0.8, and 1.60 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, respectively. This is the first phase IV study with ECMPS in the Turkish population. Renal function was preserved in both groups. Only 2.5% of patients were excluded because of side effects. Use of ECMPS in combination with prednisolone and CyA is an effective and safe therapeutic choice for both de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation without induction therapy: results after 12 months of treatment. German Pediatric Renal Transplantation Study Group

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) of kidney transplants are considered as risk factor in the development of chronic rejection. In adult renal transplantation (RTx), ARE have been significantly reduced by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) and steroids (Pred). Reports of pediatric RTx on a maintenance immunosuppression with MMF are restricted to patients (P) after antibody induction therapy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of MMF combined with CyA and Pred in pediatric RTx without induction therapy were evaluated in an open-labeled multicenter study. RESULTS: From 10/1996 to 6/1999, 65 pediatric P (MMF group) were followed for at least 6 months, 58 of 65 for 12 months. These P were compared with 54 retrospectively analyzed pediatric P who were transplanted between 1990 and 1996 and had received CyA, Pred, and azathioprine for immunosuppression (historic AZA group). Within the first 6 months after RTx, 18 of 65 (MMF group) and 32 of 54 (historic AZA group) P showed clinical signs of acute rejection (P<0.01). Thereafter only one further P in the MMF group developed a first ARE. Graft loss due to rejection occurred in one MMF- and seven AZA-treated P (P<0.05). The creatinine-clearance 3 and 6 months after RTx was higher in the MMF group. Major adverse events (MMF group) included infections of the urinary and the upper respiratory tract, diarrhea, and leukopenia. Cytomegalovirus-infection occurred in 13 P and 2 P developed cytomegalovirus disease. One P developed PTLD 10 months after RTx and recovered after the reduction of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MMF, CyA, and Pred reduced ARE in pediatric RTx without incurring major side effects.     

New immunosuppressive treatment in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been successfully introduced into clinical practice with evident benefits for renal transplant recipients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To evaluate some clinical results of MMF introduction, two groups of subjects underwent cadaveric renal transplants over the last 3 years and were retrospectively investigated. The first group (AZA group) contained 40 subjects (26 males and 14 females) on triple-drug therapy with steroids, cyclosporine and azathioprine (AZA). The second group (MMF group) contained 25 patients ( 19 males and 6 females) on the same regime with steroids and cyclosporine but MMF was administered as a third drug instead of AZA. The AZA group received renal transplant after a mean dialytic time of 32 +/- 19 months and the AZA group's dialytic time was 39.9 +/- 17 months. Clinical data, collected after a minimum 12 months observational period included a crude mortality rate and survival analysis recognized by Kaplan-Meyer curve, creatinine, creatinine clearance, rejection episodes and major clinical events such as infections and acute tubular necrosis. RESULTS: One subject died in each group. For kidney graft survival, Kaplan Meyer survival analysis showed a mean survival time of 1170.04 days in the AZA group vs 845 in the MMF group without statistical significance. Graft survival demonstrated 5:40 (12.5%) graft losses in the AZA group vs no kidney transplant loss in the MMF group (the only deceased patient had a well functioning kidney). The curve of graft cumulative proportion survival analysis demonstrated a more improved survival in the MMF group, but this difference did not reach a statistical significance (p = 0.07). Acute rejection episodes in the AZA group were 37.5% vs. 20% in the MMF group. In both groups, CMV infection was successfully treated with specific antiviral agents. CONCLUSIONS: MMF represents an important step towards induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. Our experience in a relatively small cohort investigated in a single center, demonstrates encouraging results regarding graft survival in comparison to those detected in conventional triple drug therapy. Surprisingly, in spite of stronger immunosuppressive treatment, the prevalence of CMV infections was not statistically different in the MMF versus the AZA group.     

Conversion of liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine with renal impairment to mycophenolate mofetil.

The management of liver transplant recipients with renal function impairment remains controversial because cyclosporine withdrawal from triple immunosuppression regimens may be followed by graft rejection. A nonnephrotoxic and powerful immunosuppressant such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could allow a reduction of cyclosporine dosage or its withdrawal and an improvement in renal function in these patients. Eleven patients with serum creatinine levels greater than 1.5 mg/dL, normal graft function, and a rejection-free period of at least 1 year started MMF at a dose of 2000 mg/d (reduced in case of adverse events) while cyclosporine dosage was slowly reduced. At last follow-up (63 +/- 5 weeks), 7 patients remained free of cyclosporine (6 of those patients are also free of steroids), 2 patients reduced their cyclosporine dose, and 2 patients developed mild acute rejection that responded to a switch to tacrolimus therapy. Serum creatinine and urea levels in the 7 patients free of cyclosporine decreased from 2.22 +/- 0.13 to 1.90 +/- 0.19 mg/dL (P =.05) and 0.95 +/- 0.10 to 0.60 +/- 0.10 g/L (P <.001), respectively. Creatinine clearance increased from 38.16 +/- 5.60 to 47.01 +/- 6. 76 mL/min (P =.005). Control of arterial hypertension also improved. Tolerance to MMF was good, but 6 patients required dose reductions, mainly because of asymptomatic anemia. In conclusion, in liver transplant recipients with stable graft function, MMF may allow cyclosporine dose reduction or discontinuation, thus improving renal function and the control of arterial hypertension. This change of treatment must be carefully monitored because of the frequent need for MMF dose reduction and the risk for rejection.     

The influence of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine and mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics on the incidence of acute rejection and infectious complications after renal transplantation

PURPOSE: The present retrospective study investigated the influence of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) instead of azathioprine (AZA) as part of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were used for associations with the incidence of acute rejection (AR) episodes and infectious complications after renal transplantation. METHODS: The 66 consecutive renal transplant recipients reported herein excluded ABO-incompatible transplants or cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of tacrolimus, steroids, and AZA 1-2 mg/kg/d in 22 patients (between February 1998 and December 2000) or MMF 2 g/d in 44 patients (since January 2001). CMV infection was defined as positive CMV-antigenemia. MPA PK was studied on day 28 after transplantation in 21 recipients. RESULTS: AR occurred in 13.6% of patients in the MMF group compared with 18.2% in the AZA group. The viral infection (CMV, varicella zoster virus, adenovirus hemorrhagic cystitis, and malignancy related to Epstein-Barr [EB] virus) rate was 22.7% in the MMF group and 0% in the AZA group (P = .015). There were no bacterial or fungal infections observed in the 2 groups. MMF dose per body weight was significantly lower among patients with AR than those without AR (25.1 vs 35.6 mg/kg; P = .026). There were no differences in MPA PK parameters between patients with and without viral infections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with MMF required less treatment for AR, however, there were no significant differences. MMF dose per body weight may play an important role in the occurrence of AR. Although virus infections occurred in recipients treated with MMF, MPA PK did not influence the infectious complications after renal transplantation.     

Randomized, prospective trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: In simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation, manifestations of renal allograft rejection typically become evident before those of pancreatic rejection. This study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in prevention of renal rejection after primary SPK transplantation. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, multicenter study, patients received MMF 1.5 g twice daily (n=74) or AZA 1-3 mg/kg daily (n=76) for 1 year after transplantation. The incidence of rejection was assessed at 6 months. Adverse events were tracked through 1 year. Survival data are reported through 2 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: rejection (27% vs. 39%); rejection or death (34% vs. 42%); rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal (i.e., treatment failure; 41% vs. 55%). Six-month efficacy trends favored MMF, and time to rejection or treatment failure was significantly longer when compared with AZA (P=0.049). One-year efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: treatment of renal rejection (35% vs. 47%); renal allograft loss or death (9% vs. 12%); pancreas allograft loss or death (15% vs. 14%). Five MMF patients (7%) and four (5%) in the AZA group died. More MMF than AZA patients developed opportunistic infections (54% vs. 38%), but the pathogens did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Trends for most efficacy parameters favored MMF over AZA, and time to renal allograft rejection or treatment failure was statistically significantly longer for MMF. The use of MMF in the treatment of SPK recipients is a useful advance.     

Short-term combination of mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine as a therapeutic option for renal transplant recipients: A prospective,multicenter, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), compared to azathioprine (AZA), reduces acute rejection and treatment failure in cyclosporine (CsA) and steroid regimens, but its effect on graft survival is unproven from prospective studies and prolonged use is costly. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of replacing MMF by AZA after 3 months. METHODS: This 28 center, prospective, 12-month, parallel group, open-label study, randomized patients to three groups with microemulsion formulation of CsA (ME-CsA) and steroids as baseline therapy. Group 1 (n=158) received MMF for 3 months, replaced by AZA for 9 months; group 2 (n=162) received MMF for 12 months; and group 3 (n=157) received AZA for 12 months. RESULTS: Treatment failure and the cumulative rate of acute rejection were significantly lower in the MMF groups compared with the AZA group (P=0.007 and P=0.03, respectively). Graft loss, death, and safety profiles of all three treatments were similar over 12 months, as were mean serum creatinine levels. Switching from MMF to AZA did not affect treatment failure. No patient in group 1 experienced a recurrent rejection after month 3, one patient died, and nine patients experienced first rejection episodes. Most rejections (6/9) were steroid-sensitive and histologically mild. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of MMF by AZA after 3 months of therapy with ME-CsA and steroids provides comparable efficacy and safety profiles to continuous MMF over 12 months. Although apparently a cost-effective option, long-term studies are required to assess the benefit/risk ratio of this therapy switch in different patient subpopulations.     

Analysis of a single-center experience with mycophenolate mofetil based immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Purpose. Acute rejection continues to be a major clinical issue in renal transplantation. Three large multicenter trials have demonstrated a 50% decline in biopsy‐proven rejection when mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given to renal transplant recipients with corticosteroids and cyclosporine. The purpose of this study was to compare the 6‐month outcome of renal transplant recipients using MMF and non‐MMF based immunosuppression protocols over a 4‐year period at a single center.
Methods. This retrospective study analyzed three patient groups defined by their immunosuppression protocol. The first group included patients who received a quadruple immunosuppression regimen of antilymphocyte induction (ATG), cyclosporine (CYA), azathioprine (AZA), and corticosteroids (CCS), and were transplanted between October 1993 and May 1995 (AZA group). The second group included patients who received a triple immunosuppression regimen of CYA, MMF, and CCS, and were transplanted between June 1995 and May 1996 (MMF group). The third group included patients who were transplanted between January 1997 and December 1997, and received an immunosuppression regimen of CYA and MMF with a reduced CCS dosing schema (reduced steroid group (RST)). Data were collected from a retrospective review of inpatient and outpatient clinical records.
Results. A total of 325 patients were included in the study (106 AZA, 106 MMF, 113 RST). The demographic characteristics of the three groups were similar; however, the mean donor age for the AZA group was 40±15.1 years versus 33±14.1 years and 34±13.1 years for the MMF and RST groups, respectively (p<0.043). The incidence of acute, biopsy‐proven rejection at 6 months was significantly less in the MMF group when compared with the AZA group [16 (15.1%) versus 35 (33%) patients, p=0.002]. However, the incidence of acute, biopsy‐proven rejection in the RST group (35 patients, 31%) was similar to that of the AZA group. Kaplan–Meier estimates for the cumulative incidence of acute rejection demonstrated a significant difference between the MMF group and the other two groups (p=0.0059). The AZA group had more severe rejection as demonstrated by the more frequent use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection treatment (68.4% episodes) compared with the MMF (38.9%) and RST (47.6%) groups. After 6 months of follow‐up, 11 patients had lost their grafts (8, AZA; 1, MMF; 2, RST). One patient died in each of the AZA and RST groups due to hemorrhage and a pulmonary embolus, respectively. Four AZA patients were diagnosed with a malignancy (three post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, one squamous skin cell carcinoma) compared with 2 MMF patients (prostate cancer, basal skin cell carcinoma) and no RST patients. Herpes zoster was the only infection that occurred more frequently in the MMF group (p=0.03). No other differences in infection rates were noted among the three groups. The initial length of hospital stay declined significantly over the 4‐year study period [11±4.3 d (AZA), 7.0±4.0 d (MMF), 6.2±3.3 d (RST), p<0.001]. Total number of hospital days for the first 6 months also followed a similar declining pattern. Despite using intravenous cyclosporine immediately post‐transplant in the MMF and RST groups, the incidence of delayed graft function was similar among the three groups. Average serum creatinine at 1 month was significantly lower in the MMF group (p=0.008), but no difference was noted at 3 and 6 months when compared with the AZA and RST groups.
Conclusion. This retrospective analysis indicates that MMF is an effective immunosuppressant. Decreased length of stay and less steroid resistant rejections with MMF is favorable for decreased hospital costs. However, the rebound in rejection rate with the RST group suggests that further study is needed to define the optimal use of this agent in combination with others to maximize effectiveness and minimize negative side effects.     

Reversal of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after heart transplantation-potential role of mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CCN) after heart transplantation is a progressive condition that may lead to end-stage renal failure. The extent to which CCN is reversible with reduction or withdrawal of cyclosporine therapy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the reversibility of CCN and to assess the safety and efficacy of a strategy of cyclosporine dosage reduction, combined with conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil (AZA/MMF switch) to maintain immunosuppression. METHODS: An AZA/MMF switch followed by cyclosporine dose reduction was undertaken in 30 heart transplant recipients (23 men, 7 women; mean age, 54 +/- 2 years) with established CCN at a mean of 90 +/- 9 months after transplantation (range, 17-182 months). The mean maintenance MMF dosage was 2.3 +/- 0.1 g/day (n = 28). Mean cyclosporine dosage was decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day before AZA/MMF switch to 1.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Three patients (10%) were withdrawn from MMF, 2 because of diarrhea and the third because of severe pneumonia that developed within 2 weeks of AZA/MMF switch. All 3 were restabilized with AZA. One patient (4%) experienced acute rejection 7 months after AZA/MMF switch. This resolved after an oral pulse of prednisolone. Systemic infections occurred in 6 patients within 12 months of AZA/MMF switch. Actuarial survival 1 year after AZA/MMF switch was 86% +/- 6%. One patient died of infection and 3 of other causes. Serum creatinine concentration decreased from 248 +/- 15 micromol/liter before cyclosporine dosage reduction to 193 +/- 11 micromol/liter and 206 +/- 19 micromol/liter at 3 and 12 months after dosage reduction (both p < 0.01 versus baseline, n = 23). Of the 23 patients who remained on MMF at 12 months, a decrease in serum creatinine was documented in 19 (83%). Four patients showed no improvement or showed deterioration in renal function, and three of these progressed to end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has a significant reversible component in most patients. A strategy of AZA/MMF switch combined with cyclosporine dosage reduction is generally well tolerated and results in short-term improvement in renal function in most patients. Close vigilance is required during the first 12 months after AZA/MMF switch because both acute rejection and infection may occur.     

Elective withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and prednisone

In a retrospective study we investigated the risk of acute rejection after the withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 39 adult patients treated with cyclosporine (CyA), prednisone, and MMF for at least 6 months following renal transplantation. After reaching a stable renal graft function, MMF was withdrawn and CyA and prednisone were continued. Preceding the withdrawal of MMF, four patients experienced an acute rejection. During a median follow-up of 38 months after discontinuing MMF, no acute rejection occurred. The mean serum creatinine level did not change during the first 6 months after withdrawal of MMF. We conclude that elective withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients at 6 months after transplantation bears no important risk of an occurrence of acute rejection. Received: 24 November 1999 Revised: 11 May 2000 Accepted: 18 December 2000     

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with chronic renal failure: a word of caution

Abstract: Background: Chronic renal failure (CRF) is a common complication of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression following cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of an immunosuppressive conversion from CNIs to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with CRF on renal and cardiac graft function. Methods: Since 1999, 12 HTx recipients (10 men; 58 ± 3.6 yr of age; 8.7 ± 4.2 yr after HTx) with CNI‐based immunosuppression and a calculated creatinine clearance (CreaCl) <50 mL/min were included. Most patients (10/12) were on cyclosporine and two patients were on tacrolimus prior inclusion. MMF was started with 0.5 g/d and adjusted according to the target trough levels (2–4 ng/mL). Prednisone dosage was 0.4 mg/kg. Subsequently, CNIs were completely withdrawn. Acute rejection episodes were excluded one and three months after conversion by endomyocardial biopsy and by echocardiography every three months thereafter. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 20 ± 16 months, CreaCl improved significantly: pre‐conversion vs. post‐conversion: 32.8 ± 12.2 mg/dL vs. 42.8 ± 21.14 mg/dL, p = 0.03. However, four acute rejection episodes occurred and patients were reconverted to CNIs. Additionally, six patients had a new onset of graft vessel disease (GVD) one yr after conversion. As a result of these adverse events, the study was stopped after inclusion of only 12 of the scheduled 30 patients. Conclusions: Conversion to MMF and steroids after HTx improves renal function, but increases the risk for recurrent rejection and GVD. Therefore, MMF and steroids should only be considered in patients with a markedly low risk for rejection.     

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of chronic renal rejection

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of chronic renal rejection in rats. Studies on the efficacy of MMF in chronic renal rejection in man are scarce and controversial. AIM: The aim of this study was to verify in a prospective non-randomized study the efficacy of MMF given at the dose of 2 g/day in substitution of azathioprine (AZA) in the chronic rejection of cadaveric kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with histologically proven chronic renal rejection were enrolled. The patients were 5 males and 7 females. Mean age 38.3 +/- 13.8 years, with a mean duration of transplant of 39 +/- 19 months. Mean serum creatinine values at -6, -3, 0, +3, +6, +12 months were respectively 1.72 +/- 0.33, 1.84 +/- 0.36, 2.15 +/- 0.50, 1.88 +/- 0.54, 1.81 +/- 0.71, 1.73 +/- 0.58 mg/dl. Mean creatinine clearance values were 58.85 +/- 10.06,48.8 +/- 13.3,45.8 +/- 10.2, 54.7 +/- 13.3, 51 +/- 12.7, 57.7 +/- 18.5 ml/min. Mean deltaGFR before MMF was -2.15 ml/month. RESULTS: After MMF introduction, the overall GFR decrease attenuated. In particular in seven patients after MMF administration, we obtained a significant reduction of mean serum creatinine value (1.84 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.41mg/dl; p = 0.004). In three patients, we obtained a stabilization in GFR. Two patients were slowly progressing even after MMF introduction. After a switch to MMF in almost all patients, we obtained an improvement of renal function. In three patients, we obtained a stabilization of renal function without regression. In particular, seven patients showed a remarkable improvement of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion our data even if concerning a small number of patients, confirm the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of renal allograft chronic dysfunction.     

Complete replacement of methylprednisolone by azathioprine in cyclosporine-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients

In cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients complete corticosteroid withdrawal followed by CsA monotherapy has been associated with severe rejection episodes in a significant proportion of patients. We report the results of replacement of steroids by azathioprine (AZA) in 25 primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients initially treated with CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). MP taper was started 8.8 +/- 5.6 months posttransplant when the MP dose was either 10 mg/day or 20 mg every other day. MP was tapered off over a 5-month period. At the initiation of MP taper, AZA was added at 1 mg/kg/day and increased to 1.5 mg/kg/day after two months. The CsA dose was adjusted to maintain trough serum levels as measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) of 50-75 ng/ml, during and after MP withdrawal. Seventeen patients have remained continuously off MP for 14.6 +/- 5.0 months with stable renal function. Reinstitution of MP at 10 mg/day was required in 8 patients, 6 for rejection (1.8 +/- 0.7 months after MP withdrawal), 1 for AZA-induced leukopenia, and 1 for de novo glomerulopathy. Renal function returned to baseline in all 6 patients with rejection after reinstitution of MP. Two of these patients have again been successfully retapered off MP. In the patients withdrawn from MP, body weight and mean arterial blood pressure had decreased by 2.1 +/- 1.3 kg (P less than .05) and 11 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than .05), respectively, at the time of the most recent follow-up compared with values at the initiation of steroid withdrawal. The number of blood pressure medications per patient decreased by 38% (P less than .05) and 6 patients were able to discontinue all antihypertensive drugs after cessation of steroids. Discontinuation of MP also resulted in a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration from 248 +/- 50 to 217 +/- 55 mg/dl (P less than .05). We conclude that steroids can be replaced by AZA in the majority of CsA-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients by the end of the first posttransplant year without an adverse effect on graft survival. This protocol resulted in significant reductions in serum cholesterol, mean arterial blood pressure, and body weight, and may avoid the long-term side effects of steroid therapy.