经鼻持续气道正压通气对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的综合疗效

经鼻持续气道正压通气（CPAP）是目前治疗阻塞性呼吸暂停综合征（OSAS）最有效的内科治疗方法,通过向气道内增加一定程度的正压,保持上气道通畅,消除患者夜间缺氧,改善患者夜间打鼾,白天嗜睡等临床症状,恢复睡眠结构,并治疗与此相关的各系统疾病,提高患者长期的生活质量。     

Arbitrary-pressure continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Current resources are inadequate to meet the demand for polysomnography, resulting in long waiting lists. This study aimed to evaluate the role of arbitrary-pressure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a method to reduce delays in commencing treatment. The study was of an open, randomized, parallel design. Ninety-one subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were randomized to either arbitrary-pressure CPAP based on body mass index before treatment polysomnography or to CPAP at settings determined by polysomnography. Both interventions resulted in similar improvements in clinical outcomes as determined by Epworth Sleepiness Score, Short Form-36 Quality of Life questionnaire, objective compliance, and subjective attitudes to treatment. There was higher sleep efficiency at treatment polysomnography in the group commenced at arbitrary pressure (81.8 +/- 10.1% [mean +/- SD] compared with 72.2 +/- 18.0%, p = 0.01). Subjects unable to tolerate CPAP were identified by the use of arbitrary pressure, leading to a reduction in the proportion of "wasted" treatment polysomnograms (studies performed in subjects not persisting with treatment) relative to commencing therapy after treatment polysomnography (3 of 39 compared with 12 of 35, p = 0.01). This approach to initiating treatment with CPAP appears feasible when there are long waiting lists for polysomnography.     

持续气道正压通气对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠结构的影响

目的探讨患者白天嗜睡等症状的原因,评估经鼻持续气道内正压通气(nCRAP)治疗对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠结构的影响。方法选择2001-2004年广东省佛山市第一人民医院呼吸科34例OSAS病人在睡眠多导生理记录仪监测下,进行nCPAP治疗,观察治疗前后呼吸紊乱指数、血氧饱和度和睡眠结构的变化。结果治疗后呼吸紊乱指数下降,最低血氧饱和度上升,睡眠结构明显改善。结论nCRAP能有效地改善OSAS病人的睡眠结构和呼吸紊乱。     

A randomized controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure in mild obstructive sleep apnea

A common clinical dilemma faced by sleep physicians is in deciding the level of severity at which patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) should be treated. There is particular uncertainty about the need for, and the effectiveness of, treatment in mild cases. To help define the role of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in mild OSA we undertook a randomized controlled cross-over trial of CPAP in patients with an apnea- hypopnea index (AHI) of 5 - 30 (mean, 12.9 +/- 6.3 SD). Twenty-four-hour blood pressure and neurobehavioral function were measured at baseline, after 8 wk of treatment with CPAP, and after 8 wk of treatment with an oral placebo tablet. Twenty-eight of 42 patients enrolled in the study completed both treatment arms. Baseline characteristics were not different between those who completed the study and those who did not complete the study. Patients used CPAP for a mean (SD) of 3.53 (2.13) h per night and the mean AHI on the night of CPAP implementation was 4.24 (2.9). Nasal CPAP improved self-reported symptoms of OSA, including snoring, restless sleep, daytime sleepiness, and irritability (in-house questionnaire), more than did placebo, but did not improve objective (Multiple Sleep Latency Test) or subjective (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) measures of daytime sleepiness. We found no benefit of CPAP over placebo in any tests of neurobehavioral function, generic SF-36 (36-item Short Form Medical Outcomes Survey) or sleep-specific (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire) quality of life questionnaires, mood score (Profile of Moods States and Beck Depression Index), or 24-h blood pressure. However, the placebo tablet resulted in a significant improvement in a wide range of functional variables compared with baseline. This placebo effect may account for some of the treatment responses to CPAP observed previously in patients with mild OSA.     

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome]

Sixteen patients (male: 14, female: 2, 41-72 yrs, mean 57.5 yrs) with OSAS were treated by nCPAP in our hospital since 1987. Respiratory disturbance index ranged from 16.5 to 83.1. The longest apnea duration was 35.0-120.5 seconds before the treatment. Two patients were treated with Sleep Easy III (Respironics Inc.) and others with a home made instruments. nCPAP was set at a pressure of 5 to 10 cm H2O. 12 patients (75%) tolerated the device but 4(25%) did not. Polysomnographic parameters before and after nCPAP therapy were compared. The longest apnea duration was 63.1 +/- 23.5 to 40.9 +/- 27.4 seconds (P less than 0.001) and the lowest saturation oxygen was 55.1 +/- 20.4% to 71.4 +/- 18.6% (P less than 0.05). The sleep structure improved but not significant statistically. One of them used nCPAP at home for more than two. years and showed a good long term effect. We concluded that nCPAP is an effective and safe treatment for OSAS. However, patients may be uncomfortable because of the wearing of the nasal mask during sleep.     

Prediction of continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) prediction formulas can potentially simplify the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, they can be difficult to derive and validate. We tested a statistical method to derive and validate a CPAP prediction formula using the same sample population. Seventy-six OSA patients underwent polysomnography and CPAP titration. Anthropometric measures, sleep parameters, and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) were evaluated as predictors. All subsets regression was used to determine the optimum number of variables in the model. The Bayes information criterion was used to find the best-fit model. The model was then evaluated by a tenfold cross-validation procedure. Subjects were obese (BMI 31.3 ± 5.4) and had significant daytime somnolence (ESS 11.9 ± 5). Mean respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was 53.5 ± 31.3. The ESS was not predictive of titrated CPAP. The best-fit model included three variables (CPAP_pred = 30.8 + RDI × 0.03 − nadir saturation × 0.05 − mean saturation × 0.2). This model explained 67% of the variance. Our data and the literature suggest that a combination of two to three factors is predictive of titrated CPAP: RDI, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and obesity. Except for RDI, the specific factors vary in each population. A CPAP prediction formula that explains a high proportion of the titrated CPAP variance can be easily derived from parameters measured during the diagnostic work-up of OSA patients using a unique statistical model that allows derivation and validation of the formula in the same test population.     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure vs placebo continuous positive airway pressure on sleep quality in obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy has become the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the efficacy of CPAP therapy has not been evaluated against a suitable control. We investigated the effectiveness of CPAP therapy in improving sleep quality in patients with OSA. We hypothesized that CPAP improves sleep quality. PATIENTS: Forty-eight CPAP-naive OSA patients were evaluated. None were receiving antihypertensive medications, and none had major medical illnesses. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to receive either CPAP or placebo CPAP (CPAP at an ineffective pressure) for 7 days in a double-blind fashion. Forty-one patients completed the protocol. Sleep quality variables, arousals, sleep arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), and respiratory disturbance index (RDI) were assessed at baseline, after 1 day of treatment, and after 7 days of treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of treatment, time, and the interaction of the two. RESULTS: As expected, CPAP lowered RDI and number of arousals, and increased SaO(2) over time (p = 0.001). Contrary to expectations, both CPAP and placebo CPAP had comparable effects on sleep quality as assessed by sleep architecture, sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and wake after sleep onset time. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of CPAP in lowering the number of arousals and the RDI, and in raising SaO(2). However, our data suggest that short-term CPAP is no different than placebo in improving sleep architecture. Further evaluation of the effectiveness of CPAP using a suitable placebo CPAP in prospective randomized studies is needed     

Controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and may contribute to progression of cardiac dysfunction via hypoxia, elevated sympathetic nervous system activity, and systemic hypertension. Our aim was to assess the long-term effect of OSA treatment with nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on systolic heart function, sympathetic activity, blood pressure, and quality of life in patients with CHF. Fifty-five patients with CHF and OSA were randomized to 3 months of CPAP or control groups. End points were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, overnight urinary norepinephrine excretion, blood pressure, and quality of life. Nineteen patients in the CPAP group and 21 control subjects completed the study. Compared with the control group, CPAP treatment was associated with significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (delta 1.5 +/- 1.4% vs. 5.0 +/- 1.0%, respectively, p = 0.04), reductions in overnight urinary norepinephrine excretion (delta 1.6 +/- 3.7 vs. -9.9 +/- 3.6 nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.036), and improvements in quality of life. There were no significant changes in systemic blood pressure. In conclusion, treatment of OSA among patients with CHF leads to improvement in cardiac function, sympathetic activity, and quality of life.     

Long-term acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea

We studied the long-term acceptability of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in 168 consecutive patients, 147 with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 21 with snoring. Follow-up was between 1.5 and 78 months. At latest follow-up 107 of 168 (64%) were still using CPAP. Acceptance of CPAP was least for patients with snoring alone (6 of 21 persisted) and best for patients with both excessive daytime somnolence and severe hypoxemia (minimum SaO2 less than 75%), of whom 40 of 45 (89%) persisted with treatment. Patients with excessive daytime somnolence but without severe hypoxemia were less tolerant of CPAP (39 of 71, 55%, persisted) than patients with no symptoms of excessive somnolence but with severe hypoxemia (21 of 30, 70%, persisted). The most common reasons for discontinuing CPAP were intolerance of the mask (26 of 61), the inconvenience of treatment (16 of 61), and the lack of symptomatic benefit from treatment (10 of 61). We concluded that long-term acceptance of CPAP was difficult to predict in advance but that it was most likely in patients with the most severe sleep apnea. Because intolerance of the mask and inconvenience were the most common reasons for ceasing treatment, improvements in the design of CPAP systems and careful patient training may improve the acceptability of CPAP substantially.     

Cerebral hemodynamic changes in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome after continuous positive airway pressure treatment

Background

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) are at increased risk for cerebrovascular diseases. The underlying mechanisms remain obscure. It may occur through a reduction in cerebral vascular reactivity. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective in reducing the occurrence of apneas. We hypothesized that treatment with CPAP improves cerebral vascular reactivity.

Methods

This is a prospective study with OSAS patients. The apnea test (ApT) was calculated as an increase of mean artery velocity during apnea: [Artery velocity in apnea minus Resting artery velocity]/Resting artery velocity expressed as percentage. After 2 years of CPAP treatment, the test was repeated.

Results

Seventy-six patients represented the study pool. After 2 years of treatment with CPAP, we were able to conduct a reassessment in 65 patients. Of the 65 patients who finished the clinical study, 56 were men, and 9 were women, with an average age of 48.1?±?10.4 years. There was an improvement in the ApT after CPAP treatment (30.8?±?12.1 vs 39.8?±?15.1; p:0.000). The values of cerebral blood flow velocities, diastolic blood pressure in apnea, and basal heart rate decreased.

Conclusions

Cerebral vascular reactivity in OSAS patients measured by ApT improved after 2 years of CPAP.     

Compliance to continuous positive airway pressure therapy in a group of Portuguese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Introduction  

Obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is an emerging public health concern. Although different treatments for OSAHS had been proposed, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment in moderate to serious OSAHS in which success can be achieved by increasing compliance to CPAP.     

经鼻无创正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征血栓前状态效果评价

目的评价经鼻无创正压通气(nCPAP)对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)血栓前状态(PTS)的治疗效果。方法收集北京世纪坛医院2003年9月至2005年9月确诊的OSAS患者30例及同期健康对照者30名,血样采取均在经过前一夜睡眠监测及睡眠监测并nCPAP治疗后(OSAS组)仰卧位时立即进行。结果OSAS组与健康对照组比较,OSAS患者血液中血小板α颗粒膜蛋白-140(GMP-140)升高;部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、抗凝血酶Ⅲ复合物(AT-Ⅲ)以及血浆组织型纤溶酶原激活物(t-PA)降低,血浆组织型纤溶酶原抑制物(PAI)升高,与健康对照组比较各个指标在两组之间的差异均有统计学意义。nCPAP治疗后OSAS组呼吸紊乱指数由(63.21±23.23)/h降至(0.56±0.84)/h,夜间最低血氧饱和度由0.68±0.07上升至0.90±0.02,GMP-140和PAI分别降至(17.07±7.97)%、(95.83±5.91)%,AT-Ⅲ和t-PA分别升高至(95.20±6.67)%、(5.45±1.61)μg/L。结论OSAS患者存在PTS,nCPAP治疗可部分或全部逆转PTS,减少与OSAS相关的心脑血管栓塞性疾病的发生。     

Positional treatment vs continuous positive airway pressure in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positional treatment in the management of positional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), using objective outcome measures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single blind crossover comparison of CPAP and positional treatment for 2 weeks each. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with positional OSA, aged (mean+/-SD) 51+/-9 years, with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 17+/-8. MEASUREMENTS: (1) Daily Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores; (2) overnight polysomnography, an objective assessment of sleep quality and AHI; (3) maintenance of wakefulness testing; (4) psychometric test battery; (5) mood scales; (6) quality-of-life questionnaires; and (7) individual patient's treatment preference. RESULTS: Positional treatment was highly effective in reducing time spent supine (median, 0; range, 0 to 32 min). The AHI was lower (mean difference, 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 10.2; p = 0.007), and the minimum oxygen saturation was higher (4%; 95% CI, 1% to 8%; p = 0.02) on CPAP as compared with positional treatment. There was no significant difference, however, in sleep architecture, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, maintenance of wakefulness testing sleep latency, psychometric test performance, mood scales, or quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSION: Positional treatment and CPAP have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with positional OSA.