Transvertebral Transsacral strut grafting for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 with fibular allograft

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical retrospective study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 25 consecutive patients with symptomatic high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 treated by decompression and transvertebral, transsacral strut grafting with fibular allograft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Symptomatic high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis serves as a challenging clinical problem. Traditional treatment by in situ posterolateral arthrodesis has been associated with pseudarthrosis rates up to 50%. Even with successful posterolateral fusion, the graft is in an unfavorable biomechanical environment, owing to it being under tension, which can allow for progression of lumbosacral kyphosis (slip angle) and sagittal translation (slip). Open reduction of spondylolisthesis improves the biomechanical situation by allowing a trapezoidal interbody graft at L5-S1, but is associated with neurologic deficits in up to 30% of patients. The technique used in this particular study achieves the biomechanical goal of a structural interbody construct without the necessity of anatomically reducing the translational slip. The fibular strut grafts were placed through an anterior approach as part of an anterior/posterior procedure, or via a posterior approach as part of a posterior-only procedure. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 symptomatic patients with high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 had an average age of 29.8 years. Six patients were 16 years or younger. Eight patients underwent a posterior-only approach with posterior transosseous fibular strut grafting across S1 into the L5 vertebral body combined with posterolateral arthrodesis L4-S1 using a pedicle screw-rod construct. Seventeen patients underwent a combined anterior/posterior approach with transosseous fibular allograft strut grafting at L5-S1 and L4-L5 interbody arthrodesis using a femoral ring allograft supplemented with L4-S1 posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation. No reduction attempts were performed, other than those occurring spontaneously by patient positioning and decompression. Patients were evaluated for clinical improvement and radiographically. Clinical outcomes were measured with the scoliosis research society outcome instrument. Radiographs were followed for arthrodesis, translation, and slip angle. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range, 30 to 71 mo). All patients preoperatively had a grade III to V slip using the Meyerding classification (mean 3.7). The slip angle averaged 37 degrees. RESULTS: The postoperative mean slip grade was 3.5 compared with 3.7 preoperatively (no significant difference). The mean slip angle improved to 27 degrees (8 to 40 degrees) postoperatively from 37 degrees (13 to 51 degrees) preoperatively (P<0.05). All patients went on to a stable arthrodesis, with no progression in slip or slip angle. There were no permanent neurologic deficits among any of the subjects, and all patients demonstrated improvement in their preoperative gait disturbance. Scoliosis research society functional outcome score showed 24/25 extremely satisfied or somewhat satisfied at latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment by this method showed improvement in lumbosacral kyphosis while avoiding the neurologic injury risk associated with open slip-reduction maneuvers. Despite no reduction in translational deformity, this technique offers excellent fusion results, good clinical outcomes, and prevents further sagittal translation and lumbosacral kyphosis progression.     

Biomechanical comparison of translaminar screw versus pedicle screw supplementation of anterior femoral ring allografts in one-level lumbar spine fusion

Pedicle screws (PS) can provide initial stabilization of anterior interbody femoral ring allograft (FRA) lumbar constructs. Translaminar screws (TLS) have also been advocated for this procedure. The objective of this study was to use an in vitro human cadaveric model to compare the stability of one-level anterior interbody lumbar constructs stabilized with PS and those stabilized with TLS. Five human cadaveric spinal motion segments (L4-S2) were biomechanically evaluated in the intact condition and using the follow- ing methods of stabilization: anterior interbody fusion with FRA, anterior FRA supplemented with PS, and anterior FRA supplemented with TLS. Stability was determined for each construct by measuring construct displacement as a function of applied load under the following conditions: compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending to each side, and axial torsion. There were no statistically significant differences in construct stability between FRA supplemented with PS and FRA supplemented with TLS under any of the loading conditions. In selected cases, supplementation of anterior femoral ring allograft with translaminar screws is a viable alternative to supplementation with pedicle screws.     

Arthrodesis of the ankle with cancellous-bone screws and fibular strut graft. Biomechanical analysis

The stability of an arthrodesis with two cancellous-bone screws across the ankle joint was evaluated in eighteen ankles from fresh-frozen cadavera. Tibiotalar motion was recorded in response to the following loading modes: medial-lateral moment, plantar flexion-dorsiflexion moment, and internal-external tibial torque. The series of loading tests was performed with two cancellous-bone screws through the tibia into the talus and a lateral fibular strut graft fixed with a proximal and a distal screw. The tests were repeated after the strut graft was removed, and again after it had been reapplied. The amount of motion at the site of the arthrodesis was greatest with tibial torque and was least with medial-lateral bending; this was true for specimens with or without a fibular strut graft. Removal of the strut graft allowed increased tibiotalar motion for all modes of loading; increases in motion were far greater for specimens of poor bone quality.     

The biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of anterior lumbar fusions: a canine model

An in vivo model was developed to compare the biomechanical stability, incidence of radiographic union, bone formation rate, and bone graft remodeling parameters of anterior interbody fusions. Eighteen 1-year-old beagles underwent anterior and posterior spinal destabilization procedures at L5-L6 to produce a reproducible amount of spinal instability--resection of the anterior longitudinal ligament, L5-L6 intervertebral disk, L5 and L6 lamina, spinous processes, zygoopophyseal joints, and ligamentum flavum. Group I (N = 6) were surgically destabilized controls; Group II (N = 6) underwent anterior L5-L6 interbody fusion with iliac crest bone graft; and Group III (N = 6) underwent anterior stabilization with a longitudinal fibular strut graft in addition to the same operative procedure as Group II. Six months postoperatively the group with the highest incidence of successful radiographic L5-L6 arthrodesis was Group III, anterior interbody fusion and fibular stabilization (p less than .10). The rank order of biomechanical stability was the same for the three groups for both torsional and axial compressive stiffness, with Group I (destabilized controls) being the least rigid, then Group II (anterior fusion with iliac crest grafting only), and the most rigid to both torsion and axial compressive loading was Group III (anterior fusion with fibular stabilization and iliac crest bone graft). The bone formation rate [mm3/(mm3 x year) x 10(3)], which was derived from the distance between fluorochrome markers, revealed that the more stable the individual spinal construct, the lower the bone formation rate. In summary, the beagle provided a successful model for studying in vivo the response of anterior bone grafts over a 6-month interval and provided comparative biomechanical and histomorphometric data on spinal interbody fusion techniques.     

Sacral insufficiency fracture surgically treated by fibular allograft

Sacral insufficiency fractures have been known to occur distally after long instrumentation to the sacrum. Most such fractures are treated nonoperatively, but surgery is indicated for patients who have nonunions, persistent pain, neurologic deficits, or gross displacement. The current report elucidates the potential complication of sacral fracture after long lumbar arthrodesis, reviews the pertinent literature, presents three patients with sacral fractures after long instrumented lumbar spinal arthrodesis to the sacrum, and describes a new surgical technique for stabilizing such fractures. One patient was treated nonoperatively, and two patients were treated with arthrodesis from a posterior approach and augmentation with a strut fibular allograft. All three patients were followed to radiographic and clinical union. The authors conclude that sacral fracture is a potential complication after a long lumbar arthrodesis. Nonoperative techniques are often successful, but when they are not, a new technique using fibular allografts can be successful.     

复合骨环与自体髂骨块行犬前路腰椎椎间融合术的生物力学研究

目的：比较复合骨环与自体髂骨块行犬腰椎椎间融合的生物力学刚度。方法：8只杂种犬随机分成4组，分别以复合骨环和自体髂骨块行腰椎椎间融合，CSS万能生物力学测试机测定脊柱功能单位的5种抗载荷刚度。结果：复合骨环组在抗屈曲、抗伸展、抗侧弯和抗纵向位移方面与自体髂骨块组间存在显著性差异。结论：复合骨环行腰椎椎间融合明显优于自体髂骨块，可以成为理想的脊柱融合材料。     

Pseudarthrosis repair. Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft

Pseudarthrosis repair in the lumbar spine is one of the most challenging problems faced by spine surgeons. Historically high failure rates with posterior repair have led to the use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with tricortical iliac crest autograft in these difficult cases. More recently, femoral ring allografts packed with autograft bone have been advocated as another method that would decrease donor site morbidity. Two series of patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior instrumentation to repair pseudarthrosis (Group I, 33 patients with tricortical autogenous iliac crest and Group II, 20 patients with femoral ring allografts). At minimum 2-year followup, there was no difference in fusion rates (Group I, 32 of 33 versus Group II, 20 of 20). Patients in Group I had radiographic fusion develop more rapidly than patients in Group II (12 months versus 18 months), but a significant proportion of patients in Group I (35%) had an average of 2 mm of graft subsidence. Despite excellent fusion rates in both groups, functional outcomes were not as good with only 28% of patients in Group I and 36% of patients in Group II returning to work. Using anterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent method to repair pseudarthrosis using femoral ring allografts or autogenous iliac crest. However, femoral ring allografts offer the potential to decrease donor site morbidity, allowing the surgeon to treat multiple spine levels.     

The axial cage. a pilot study for interbody fusion in higher-grade spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis is challenging. Posterolateral fusion alone has a high rate of pseudarthrosis. Surgical stabilization of higher-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with a fibula strut graft is an effective technique but is associated with harvest site morbidity and graft fractures.PURPOSE: We hypothesized that a lumbar interbody fusion with a long, threaded titanium cage, packed with cancellous bone, inserted across the center of the spondylolisthesis, would provide the rigid immobilization necessary for successful arthrodesis. This would, therefore, eliminate the need for fibula harvest and possibly reduce the need for posterior instrumentation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective, study cohort of 11 consecutive patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with higher-grade spondylolisthesis (grade II-IV) were considered eligible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain was measured with a 10-point Numerical Rating Score (NRS). The Oswestry Disability Index (OSI) was used to assess patient function. Patients also responded to a satisfaction scale to evaluate satisfaction with their outcome. Radiographs were reviewed 1, 3, 6, 12, and, when available, 24 months after surgery. METHODS: We reviewed our clinical results and technical outcomes in 11 consecutive patients who underwent this unique form of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a custom axial cage. RESULTS: There were no surgical or postoperative complications. Serial x-rays revealed no implant subsidence or loosening. There have been no implant fractures or reoperation. Clinical results have been excellent with significant pain reduction and improved function. At 1 year after surgery the mean NRS was 3.5 (range, 0-7), a significant average reduction of 5.0 points. (p<.001) All patients have been satisfied with their results. CONCLUSIONS: The axial cage technique appears to be a significant improvement over the fibular strut graft for the treatment of higher-grade spondylolisthesis. It provides significant reduction in pain, significant improvement in function, high patient satisfaction, and avoids the morbidity and fracture risks associated with fibular strut grafting.     

Failed arthrodesis of the spine for severe spondylolisthesis. Salvage by interbody arthrodesis

Four patients who had had grade-III or grade-IV symptomatic spondylolisthesis and a failed posterior or posterolateral arthrodesis were treated with transperitoneal anterior lumbosacral interbody arthrodesis and fixation with a fibular graft; the procedure was sometimes followed by posterolateral arthrodesis of the spine. The patients were examined ten to twenty-two years after the salvage operation. At follow-up, all had a solid fusion of the fifth lumbar to the first sacral vertebra. No neurological deficits had worsened and no iatrogenic neurological deficits had developed. The slip angle had improved by an average of 23.2 degrees (range, 12 to 35 degrees).     

Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is an osteoinductive protein approved for use in the anterior lumbar interspace. High fusion rates with rhBMP-2 have been reported with threaded interbody allograft dowels. There may be a clinical benefit for the patient by adding rhBMP-2 to the allograft. PURPOSE: To compare the fusion rates and clinical outcomes of patients treated with allograft interbody fusions with and without the addition of rhBMP-2. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive patient enrollment with minimum 24-month follow-up. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventy-five patients with lumbar interbody fusions at 1-3 spinal segments. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic: X-ray and computed tomographic scan analysis using the Molinari-Bridwell fusion scale. METHODS: Seventy-five patients scheduled for lumbar fusion were enrolled sequentially. Group 1: 30 patients had anterior interbody allografts alone. Group 2: 45 patients had anterior interbody allograft filled with rhBMP-2. All cases had posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 165 surgical levels (62 allograft alone/103 allograft+BMP) were included. Fusion data and clinical outcomes were collected for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Statistically higher fusion rates were observed in the patients with BMP at all time points compared with allograft alone. Group 2 (+ BMP) fusion rates were 94%, 100%, and 100% at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Group 1 (-BMP) fusion rates were 66%, 84%, and 89% at the same time intervals. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved in Group 2 compared with Group 1 at 6 months. There were no revisions (0%) in the BMP group and 4 revision fusion surgeries (13%) in the allograft group. No untoward effects were attributable to the rhBMP-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the efficacy of an innovative lumbar fusion technique: an interbody femoral ring allograft, combined with an osteoinductive stimulant (rhBMP-2), protected by pedicle screws. This combination of a structural interbody allograft with rhBMP-2 eliminates the insult of iliac crest harvest, allows for reliable radiographic analysis, and results in successful fusion formation in 100% of the cases in this study.     

Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants

STUDY DESIGN: Human cadaveric study on initial segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants. OBJECTIVES: To compare the initial segmental stability and compressive strength of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion construct using a new cortical bone spacer machined from allograft to that of titanium threaded and nonthreaded posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages, tested as stand-alone and with supplemental pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cages were introduced to overcome the limitations of conventional allografts. Radiodense cage materials impede radiographic assessment of the fusion, however, and may cause stress shielding of the graft. METHODS: Multisegmental specimens were tested intact, with posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants inserted into the L4/L5 interbody space and with supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Three posterior lumbar interbody fusion implant constructs (Ray Threaded Fusion Cage, Contact Fusion Cage, and PLIF Allograft Spacer) were tested nondestructively in axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending. The implant-specimen constructs then were isolated and compressed to failure. Changes in the neutral zone, range of motion, yield strength, and ultimate compressive strength were analyzed. RESULTS: None of the stand-alone implant constructs reduced the neutral zone. Supplemental pedicle screw fixation decreased the neutral zone in flexion-extension and lateral bending. Stand-alone implant constructs decreased the range of motion in flexion and lateral bending. Differences in the range of motion between stand-alone cage constructs were found in flexion and extension (marginally significant). Supplemental posterior fixation further decreased the range of motion in all loading directions with no differences between implant constructs. The Contact Fusion Cage and PLIF Allograft Spacer constructs had a higher ultimate compressive strength than the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical data did not suggest any implant construct to behave superiorly either as a stand-alone or with supplemental posterior fixation. The PLIF Allograph Spacer is biomechanically equivalent to titanium cages but is devoid of the deficiencies associated with other cage technologies. Therefore, the PLIF Allograft Spacer is a valid alternative to conventional cages.     

Anterior and posterior allografts in symptomatic thoracolumbar deformity

The radiographic and clinical results of 105 patients with symptomatic spinal deformities were categorized retrospectively based on surgical approach and type of bone autograft or allograft used for each patient's fusion surgery into seven different groups and compared with one another. The three bone autograft control groups were posterior autograft only (n = 20), anterior autograft only (n = 6), and combined anterior and posterior autograft (n = 12). The allograft groups were posterior morcellized allograft (n = 7), posterior morcellized allograft and anterior autograft (n = 11), anterior structural interbody allografts and posterior mixture of allograft and autograft (n = 37), and anterior strut allograft with posterior mixture of allograft and autograft (n = 12). Radiographs revealed high pseudoarthrosis rates for adults with a posterior-only allograft and with anterior strut allografts spanning four or more levels. Results of the self-assessment outcomes questionnaire, at a mean follow-up period of 52 months, revealed less pain and improved cosmesis for all groups, and improved function in patients who had undergone combined anteroposterior fusion. The authors conclude that posterior cancellous allograft is a poor substitute for autograft bone and that strut allografts spanning more than four levels require technique modifications to enhance their effectiveness. In general, anterior structural allografts are effective in maintaining correction, result in fusion rates comparable to those of autografts, and correlate to improved outcomes.     

Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: Multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction

This retrospective study evaluated a single surgeon's series of patients treated by multilevel cervical disc excision (two or three levels), allograft tricortical iliac crest arthrodesis, and anterior instrumentation. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare fusion success and clinical outcome between multilevel Smith-Robinson interbody grafting and tricortical iliac strut graft reconstruction, both supplemented with anterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. The incidence of nonunion for cervical discectomy and fusion varies widely depending on the number of disc levels involved, type of bone graft used, and whether the anterior grafting is supplemented with instrumentation. An alternative to multilevel interbody fusion is corpectomy and strut grafting, in which the incidence of nonunion has been reported to be 27% with autograft and 41% with allograft. Sixty-four consecutive patients who underwent allograft tricortical iliac crest reconstruction and anterior cervical plating were studied. The average follow-up was 39 months. There were 38 patients in the discectomy and interbody grafting group and 26 patients in the corpectomy and strut graft reconstruction group. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in 42% of the anterior cervical interbody fusion patients and 31% of the corpectomy patients. Nonunion in two-level interbody fusions occurred in 36% of the patients as compared to 10% for patients with one-level corpectomies; while 54% of patients with three-level interbody fusions and 44% of patients with two-level corpectomies were noted to have pseudoarthrosis. Higher percentages of nonunion were noted in multilevel interbody grafting than in corpectomy with strut grafting and when more vertebral levels were involved. These radiographic and clinical findings underscore the shortcomings of multilevel anterior cervical allograft reconstruction with plating. Corpectomy may be the preferred method when multiple disc levels are fused. In addition, anterior corpectomy affords decompression of significant osteophytes in a safer and quicker manner. In retrospective studies, there is a need for long-term follow-up before accurate statements can be made about the study population.     

Long structural allografts in the treatment of anterior spinal column defects.

A retrospective study of 41 patients who had anterior spinal column reconstruction using long-segment allografts between 1983 and 1998 is reported. A long-segment allograft was defined as an allograft strut that replaces a vertebral body or approximates the height of the adjacent vertebral body for the thoracolumbar or lumbar spine, or more than two vertebral bodies for the cervical or cervicothoracic spine. Forty of the 41 patients had successful anterior strut grafting with radiographic evidence of allograft incorporation at the last followup with the majority of patients having radiographic evidence of incorporation by 6 months. There where three early complications related to the allograft (two end plate fractures and one repeated cervical spine allograft dislodgment) and one late complication associated with the posterior adjunct instrumentation unrelated to the allograft (degenerative lumbar stenosis). The only procedural complication was a deep venous thrombosis and a resultant nonfatal pulmonary embolus. No allografts fractured or collapsed. These data suggest that long-segment anterior allografts work exceptionally well in maintaining vertebral height and structural integrity in numerous pathologic deformities including traumatic and infectious etiologies.     

Direct current stimulation of titanium interbody fusion devices in primates.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The fusion rate for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) varies widely with the use of different interbody devices and bone graft options. Adjunctive techniques such as electrical stimulation may improve the rate of bony fusion. PURPOSE: To determine if direct current (DC) electrical stimulation of a metallic interbody fusion device enhanced the incidence or extent of anterior bony fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: ALIF was performed using titanium alloy interbody fusion devices with and without adjunctive DC electrical stimulation in nonhuman primates. METHODS: ALIF was performed through an anterolateral approach in 35 macaques with autogenous bone graft and either a titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) fusion device or femoral allograft ring. The fusion devices of 19 animals received high (current density 19.6 microA/cm2) or low (current density 5.4 microA/cm2) DC electrical stimulation using an implanted generator for a 12- or 26-week evaluation period. Fusion sites were studied using serial radiographs, computed tomography imaging, nondestructive mechanical testing and qualitative and semiquantitative histology. RESULTS: Fusion was achieved with the titanium fusion device and autogenous bone graft. At 12 weeks, the graft was consolidating and early to moderate bridging callus was observed in and around the device. By 26 weeks, the anterior callus formation was more advanced with increased evidence of bridging trabeculations and early bone remodeling. The callus formation was not as advanced or abundant for the allograft ring group. Histology revealed the spinal fusion device had an 86% incidence of bony fusion at 26 weeks compared with a 50% fusion rate for the allograft rings. DC electrical stimulation of the fusion device had a positive effect on anterior interbody fusion by increasing both the presence and extent of bony fusion in a current density-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive DC electrical stimulation of the fusion device improved the rate and extent of bony fusion compared with a nonstimulated device. The fusion device was equivalent to or better than the femoral allograft ring in all evaluations. The use of adjunctive direct current electrical stimulation may provide a means of improving anterior interbody fusion.     

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a hybrid graft

This prospective study evaluates the clinical and radiological results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a femoral cortical ring allograft (FCA) packed with cancellous autologous bone (hybrid graft), combined with posterior pedicular fixation but without posterior fusion, for symptomatic degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Twenty-eight out of 30 consecutive adult patients were followed up for a minimum period of 2 years. Intra- and postoperative complications were seen in 2 out of 28 patients (7%); no complications resulted from the allografts. Clinically, 24 out of 28 patients (85%) had a good to excellent result, one patient (4%) a fair result, and 3 patients (11%) a poor result. Radiologically, the overall fusion rate by the level was 98% in 28 patients.     

Revision of total hip arthroplasty using an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an impaction graft: follow-up study

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of revised total hip arthroplasty procedures involving an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an Exeter impaction graft. METHOD: Eight patients (9 hips) with a mean age of 58 years underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Exeter hip impaction graft system and strut allografts between 1995 and 1998. An extensile anterior approach was used, and an anterior cortical window was created in the femur, to remove the old implant. External strut allografts were attached by wires to provide cortical support. The mean follow-up duration was 74 months. Indications for surgery were aseptic loosening of previous implants in 8 hips and infection of one hip that had previously undergone total arthroplasty. RESULTS: 19 Dall Miles cables, 4 ordinary cerclage wires, and 8 cerclage wires tightened with the clincher knot technique were used to secure the allograft to the host bone. The strut grafts were found to be incorporated in all cases. No wires became loose. One patient developed 20 degrees of angulation at the allograft-host bone junction. Using the method of Fowler and Gie, we found that one femoral implant had subsided 2 mm within the cement mantle. Two other implants had 1 mm of subsidence at the cement bone interface, and one patient had a major subsidence of 15 mm that required revision. CONCLUSION: Using an anterior cortical window in the femur to remove the old implant does not predispose to failure of the allograft to incorporate into the host bone.     

Circumferential arthrodesis using PEEK cages at the lumbar spine

Usual interbody cages at the lumbar spine are made of titanium or carbon fiber-polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Pure PEEK cages have more recently been proposed for its lower elasticity modulus. The goal of our study was to investigate a series of patients with circumferential fixation using anterior PEEK cages for degenerative lumbar spine disorders with a specific interest in the local lordosis. Fifty-seven consecutive patients aged 54.6 years (29 to 75) were reviewed. The level of arthrodesis varied from L2L3 to L5S1. The clinical status and the radiologic variations in local lordosis at the level of arthrodesis were measured. Decrease in lordosis at follow-up was tested in a multivariate analysis regarding age, obesity, spinal level, bone graft amount, type of posterior instrumentation, postoperative lordosis increase, and cage height. The average follow-up was 5.7 years (4 to 8). Clinical outcomes were excellent or good in 49 cases. Fusion was definite in 56 cases. Although 47 patients had no change in lordosis after surgery, 10 cases showed lordosis increase (8.2 degrees; 5 to 12). At follow-up, local lordosis decreased in 13 cases (5.6 degrees; 4 to 8). The linear model was significant (P<0.001; R=0.590) showing that loss in lordosis was related with postoperative lordosis increase (P=0.01), cage height (P<0.001), posterior instrumentation rigidity (P=0.026), age (P=0.047), and low level (P=0.013). Lumbar circumferential arthrodesis using PEEK cages provided good clinical results and fusion rate. However, lordosis correction was not maintained at follow-up, especially at lower levels, using high cages, in older patients, and when associated with a rigid primary posterior instrumentation. Regarding the last point, this is likely that the order of the instrumentation (posterior first, then anterior) played a role in the loss of lordosis in case of rigid posterior fixation.     

In vitro stability study of an improved implant system for minimally invasive transforaminal approach

Calf specimens from the L3-4 and L5-6 levels were used for in vitro stability testing of a new transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) implant. Results were compared with those of the conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique using two cuboid spacers. The specimens were loaded with pure moments of 10 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation without any axial preload. They were allowed to move freely and unconstrained in all directions. In extension the PLIF implants showed slightly higher degrees of stiffness than the TLIF implant. While the conventional PLIF technique results in an increased range of motion by a factor of 2.5 after implant insertion, the TLIF approach prevents segmental destabilization in axial rotation. The facet joint arthrodesis using resorbable pins reveals biomechanically interesting results and will therefore be investigated in further studies.     

Lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion: threaded devices alone versus vertical cages plus posterior instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN: An observational radiographic study examining lumbar sagittal contour of patients undergoing posterior interbody arthrodesis. OBJECTIVES: To compare operative alterations of lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion using threaded interbody devices alone versus vertical cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Technique-related alterations of lumbar sagittal contour during interbody arthrodesis have received little attention in the spinal literature. METHODS: Standing lumbar radiographs were measured for preoperative and postoperative segmental lordosis at levels undergoing posterior interbody arthrodesis using either stand-alone side-by-side threaded devices or vertical cages combined with posterior transpedicular compression instrumentation. Sagittal plane segmental correction (or loss of correction) was calculated and statistically compared. RESULTS: The radiographs of 30 patients (34 spinal segments) undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral arthrodesis were compared. Seventeen patients (18 segments) had undergone interbody fusion using threaded cages,whereas 13 patients (16 segments) underwent fusion using vertically oriented mesh cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation. Preoperative segmental lordosis averaged 8 degrees for both groups. For patients undergoing fusion with threaded cages, there was a mean lordotic loss of 3 degrees/segment. For patients undergoing fusion with vertically oriented mesh cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation,there was a mean lordotic gain of 5 degrees/segment. This difference in segmental sagittal plane contour was highly significant (P = 0.00). CONCLUSION: Threaded fusion devices placed under interbody distraction with the endplates parallel fail to preserve or reestablish segmental lordosis. Vertical cages, however, when combined with posterior compression instrumentation, not only maintain segmental lordosis, but also can correct sagittal plane deformity.