Does combined multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance and manometry predict postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, some patients develop dysphagia postoperatively. Manometry is used to evaluate disorders of peristalsis, but has not been proven useful to identify which patients may be at risk for postoperative dysphagia. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) evaluates the effective clearance of a swallowed bolus through the esophagus. We hypothesized that MII combined with manometry may detect those patients most at risk of developing dysphagia after LNF. Between March 2003 and January 2007, 74 patients who agreed to participate in this study were prospectively enrolled. All patients completed a preoperative symptom questionnaire, MII/manometry, and 24‐h pH monitoring. All patients underwent LNF. Symptom questionnaires were administered postoperatively at a median of 18 months (range: 6–46 months), and we defined dysphagia (both preoperatively and postoperatively) as occurring more than once a month with a severity ≥4 (0–10 Symptom Severity Index). Thirty‐two patients (43%) reported preoperative dysphagia, but there was no significant difference in pH monitoring, lower esophageal sphincter pressure/relaxation, peristalsis, liquid or viscous bolus transit (MII), or bolus transit time (MII) between patients with and without preoperative dysphagia. In those patients reporting preoperative dysphagia, the severity of dysphagia improved significantly from 6.8 ± 2 to 2.6 ± 3.4 (P < 0.001) after LNF. Thirteen (17%) patients reported dysphagia postoperatively, 10 of whom (75%) reported some degree of preoperative dysphagia. The presence of postoperative dysphagia was significantly more common in patients with preoperative dysphagia (P= 0.01). Patients with postoperative dysphagia had similar lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation, peristalsis, and esophageal clearance to those without dysphagia. Neither MII nor manometry predicts dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or its occurrence after LNF. The presence of dysphagia preoperatively is the only predictor of dysphagia after LNF.     

Cycling,a manometric phenomenon due to repetitive episodes of gastroesophageal reflux and clearance

We studied intraesophageal pressure changes in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and an abnormal 24-hr pH monitoring record (N=52). Our method was simultaneous esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. We observed a three-component esophageal manometric sequence (EMS). When this sequence recurred over and over, we termed this phenomenon cycling. We found cycling in 35% of the patients (18/52). Those with cycling had lower basal LES pressures, more acid exposure, and an increased incidence of endoscopic esophagitis. That cycling resulted from repeated reflux events and their esophageal clearance was documented by scintigraphy during simultaneous manometry and pH monitoring (N=7 patients). Cycling was found on the routine esophageal manometry record of 25% of symptomatic patients (N=112) with an abnormal 24-hr pH score. In conclusion, cycling represents an esophageal manometric phenomenon due to repetitive reflux events. Its recognition during esophageal manometry may denote a severe reflux diathesis.The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official policy or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.     

Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure in gastroesophageal reflux disease: An ignored metric in high-resolution esophageal manometry

Manometry and 24-h pH interpretation have seldom been studied. Our aim was to study these parameters as gold standard in reflux disease and to identify predictors of pathological acid reflux. Retrospective case record review of all patients with reflux disease evaluated using endoscopy, manometry, and 24-h pH testing from 2010 to 2016. Patients were categorized using Johnson-DeMeester score into two groups—group I (score > 14.7, normal study) and group II (< 14.7, normal study). These groups were compared for the above-mentioned parameters. Appropriate statistical tests were applied. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The study group includes 94 patients (median age 44 years, 63.8% males). Sixty (63.8%) and 34 patients belonged to groups I and II, respectively, 76.6% patients had normal endoscopy while the remaining had mild esophagitis. Peristalsis was normal in 66%, followed by ineffective esophageal motility (19.1%) and fragmented peristalsis (14.9%). Demography, symptoms, endoscopy findings, and peristalsis characteristics were similar between the two groups. Group II patients had significantly lower basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (11.9 vs. 16.6; p < 0.02), lower integrated relaxation pressure (5.7 vs. 7.4; p < 0.01), and larger separation between LES and crural diaphragm (1.7 vs. 1.4 cm; p < 0.003). Basal LES pressure < 10 mmHg had the highest likelihood ratio (2.2) to predict an abnormal pH study. Basal LES pressure, integrated relaxation pressure, and hiatus size correlated with pathological acid reflux. Hypotensive basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure was the best predictor of an abnormal pH study but with negative linear correlation.     

Effect of hiatal hernia on esophageal manometry and pH-metry in gastroesophageal reflux disease

An increased frequency of reflux events and a prolonged acid clearance have been shown in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) patients with a hiatal hernia as compared to those without. The objective of the present study was to further investigate esophageal motility and patterns of reflux in GER patients, in relation to the presence or absence of hiatal hernia. Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH-metry were used in 42 patients with GER and 18 controls. Eighteen of the patients were considered to have a nonreducing hiatal hernia on endoscopy. Hiatal hernia patients showed a higher extent of reflux (total composite score,P=0.016; total reflux time,P=0.008, reflux time in supine position,P=0.024; reflux time in upright position,P=0.008), a lower frequency of reflux events (P=0.005), a more severe esophagitis on endoscopy (P<0.01) and a lower amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES (P=0.0009) as compared to patients without hiatal hernia. The amplitude of peristalsis at the distal esophagus was inversely related to the extent of reflux (P=0.024). Acid clearance was also significantly prolonged in the hernia subgroup (P=0.011). Although LES resting pressure did not differ significantly between the two subgroups of patients, it was inversely related to the extent of reflux in the patients with hiatal hernia (P=0.0005). It is concluded, that GER patients with hiatal hernia present with an increased amount of reflux and more severe esophagitis, which results in more severely impaired esophageal peristalsis as compared to patients without hernia. Prolonged acid clearance and impaired esophageal emptying observed in patients with hiatal hernia could be the result of both the presence of the hernia itself and the reduced peristaltic activity of the esophagus.     

Prolonged clearance is the primary abnormal reflux parameter in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis and esophagitis

The purpose of this study is to determine if frequent reflux events from an incompetent LES or poor clearance from decreased peristalsis is the predominant abnormality in PSS patients with severe reflux esophagitis. Seven patients with both classic manometric findings of PSS and endoscopic findings of esophageal ulcerations and/or Barrett's esophagus were compared to nine patients with similar endoscopic findings but with no evidence of a connective tissue disorder. All patients underwent simultaneous intraesophageal pH monitoring and scintigraphy for a total of 40 min after a radiolabeled meal. Four of the PSS patients and all the non-PSS patients had simultaneous manometry. We found that PSS patients had significantly fewer reflux events (P<0.01), but the reflux events had significantly longer duration (P<0.01) compared to patients with similar severity of esophagitis and no connective tissue disease. We conclude that decreased smooth muscle peristalsis appears to be the primary contributor to acid exposure and esophageal injury in PSS.The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.     

Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature

It is unclear whether prolonged motility monitoring improves the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal tests in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of ambulatory 24-hr pH and pressure monitoring in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Stationary manometry, edrophonium testing, and ambulatory pH and motility studies were performed in 90 consecutive patients with recurrent chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Normality limits of ambulatory 24-hr motility were established in 30 healthy controls. The diagnoses of specific esophageal motility disorders (nutcracker esophagus and diffuse esophageal spasm) by stationary and ambulatory manometry were discordant in 48% of the patients. Edrophonium testing was positive in 9 patients, but correlated poorly with esophageal diagnoses. During ambulatory studies, 144 chest pain events occurred in 42 patients, and 72 (50%) were related to esophageal dysfunction. Strict temporal associations of events with esophageal dysfunction in relation to ambulatory 24-hr pH'motility scores permitted four patient categorizations: true positives (event-related and abnormal tests), N = 15; true negatives (event-unrelated and abnormal tests), N = 10; reduced esophageal pain threshold (event-related and normal tests), N = 4; and indeterminate origin (event-unrelated and normal tests), N = 13. Overall, 19 patients (21%) had a probable esophageal cause for chest pain (14 esophageal motility disorder, 4 acid reflux, 1 both). In conclusion, ambulatory manometry increases the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal testing in noncardiac chest pain, but the gain is small. Causes of chest pain other than high esophageal pressures and acid reflux must still be sought in most patients with chest pain of unknown origin after a negative cardiac work-up.     

Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis

SUMMARY. This study was intended to assess the utility of combined multiple intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII‐EM) in evaluating reflux patients and in identifying those with esophageal dysmotility. Thirteen controls and 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) underwent combined MII‐EM with a catheter containing four impedance‐measuring segments and four solid‐state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 liquid and 10 viscous boluses to be swallowed. Distal esophageal contraction amplitude was significantly lower in GERD patients than in controls for viscous swallows (58.3 ± 7.3 mmHg versus 82.4 ± 4.1 mmHg, P = 0.005). Total bolus transit time was significantly slower in GERD patients than in controls for liquid swallows (P = 0.035). The percentages of complete bolus transit were significantly lower in GERD patients compared with controls (all P = 0.005). Half of GERD patients with normal EM still had abnormal bolus transit while three‐quarters of those with abnormal EM had abnormal bolus transit. MII helps identify bolus transit abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Combined MII‐EM is clinically useful for detecting esophageal dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis.     

Original article: The effect of argon plasma coagulation ablation on esophageal motility and chemoreceptor sensitivity in Barrett's esophagus patients

Patients with Barrett's esophagus usually demonstrate impaired esophageal motility, which affects acid clearance, together with reduced chemo‐receptor sensitivity and symptom severity. Ablative endoscopic techniques are now used to eliminate Barrett's cells. The hypothesis for this study was that ablation with argon plasma coagulation (APC) may affect esophageal sensitivity and motility in patients with Barrett's esophagus, and the aim of this study was to assess differences in these parameters before and after APC treatment. Twenty patients with Barrett's esophagus were investigated before and after APC therapy. After standard pull through manometry, water bolus aliquots were given to assess primary peristalsis and rapid water and air bolus injections to assess secondary peristalsis. Sensitivity studies were carried out using weak solutions of either hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide, together with saline washouts. Onset time for typical symptoms (t), sensory intensity rating (I), and a sensory score (SS) = (t) × (I)/100 was observed. There were no significant differences in the lower esophageal sphincter pressures (13.6 mm Hg versus 12.6 mm Hg, P= 0.8) and successful test swallows (3 mm Hg versus 5 mm Hg, P= 0.5) before and after treatment, but there was a trend for secondary peristalsis to improve (air bolus 0 versus 2, P= 0.05, water bolus 0 versus 1, P= 0.07). Sensitivity studies showed a smaller sensitivity intensity rating to both acid (61 versus 31, P= 0.02) and alkaline (91 versus 64, P= 0.03) after treatment. In conclusion, we have shown no substantive changes in esophageal motility after ablation of Barrett's esophagus cells, but have demonstrated reduced sensitivity to reflux type solutions.     

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in Chinese--role of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and esophageal motor dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is the major mechanism for gastroesophageal reflux in the Western population. The major reflux mechanism in Chinese patients with GERD has not been studied before. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with GERD and 28 controls underwent stationary baseline manometry and the 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. TLESRs were measured before and after an 850 kcal meal in the supine position. Primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis, and esophageal acid clearance were measured by esophageal manometry. RESULTS: Total time esophageal pH 相似文献   

Quantitative Differences Between Primary and Secondary Peristaltic Contractions of the Esophagus

Background and Aims

Differences in contraction characteristics between primary and secondary peristalsis have only been scarcely studied. Recently new measures of contractile activity in the human esophagus were developed. The study aims were to use combined manometry and impedance planimetry [pressure-cross-sectional area (P-CSA)] recordings from healthy volunteers to examine esophageal peristalsis, and, furthermore, to investigate the effect of the motility enhancing drug erythromycin to study differential effects on the two types of contractions.

Methods

Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study [mean age 23 (range, 19–34) years, 6 females]. An esophageal probe with a bag for CSA measurement was positioned 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Bag volume was increased stepwise from 5 to 25 ml before and after intravenous infusion of 250 mg erythromycin. Swallow-evoked primary and distension-evoked secondary esophageal peristalsis were compared with regard to (1) pressure amplitude, (2) CSA amplitude, (3) preload tension (wall tension before an evoked contraction), (4) contractile tension, and (5) work outputs.

Results

Primary peristalsis induced more efficient contractions as the contraction amplitudes, work output and contractile tension were higher compared to secondary peristalsis (P < 0.001). Erythromycin induced change in CSA during distension-evoked secondary peristalsis (CSA before 212.9 ± 26.8 vs. after 180.5 ± 23.3, P < 0.05). The sensitivity to esophageal distension increased with the distending volume both before and during erythromycin. The sensitivity was not changed by erythromycin (P = 0.6).

Conclusions

Esophageal primary peristaltic contractions were more forceful with longer duration, and higher work output compared to secondary peristalsis contractions. Erythromycin affected peristalsis only to a minor degree.     

Role of Esophageal Function Tests in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinicians typically make the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from the clinical findings and then prescribe acid-suppressing drugs. Endoscopy is usually done for persistent or severe symptoms. Esophageal function tests (EFTs: esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring) are generally reserved for patients who have the most severe disease, including those being considered for surgery. We hypothesized that EFTs are more accurate than symptoms and endoscopy in the diagnosis of GERD. This was a retrospective study undertaken in a university tertiary care center. Between October 1989 and November 1998, 822 patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD (based on symptoms and endoscopic findings) were referred for EFTs. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the 24-hr pH monitoring score showed GERD (group A, GERD^–; group B, GERD⁺). The groups were compared with respect to the incidence and severity of symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia on barium x-rays, presence and severity of esophagitis on endoscopy, and esophageal motility. In all, 247 patients (30%) had normal reflux scores (group A, GERD^–), and 575 patients (70%) had abnormal scores (Group B, GERD⁺). Eighty percent of group A and 88% of group B had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar in the two groups. Grade I–II esophagitis was diagnosed by endoscopy in 25% of group A and 35% of group B, and grade III esophagitis in 4% of group A and 11% of group B. Esophageal manometry showed that group B more often had esophageal dysmotility, consisting of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis. These data show that: (1) symptoms were unreliable for diagnosing GERD; (2) endoscopic evidence of grade I–II esophagitis was diagnostically nonspecific, and grade III was much less certain than claimed in other reports; and (3) pH monitoring identified patients with GERD and stratified them according to the severity of the disease. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are important in diagnosing GERD accurately. More liberal use of these tests early in patient management would avoid much improper and costly medical therapy and would help single out for special attention the patients with GERD who have the most severe disease.     

Relationship between multiple water swallows and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with normal esophageal motility

Multiple water swallows (MWS) stimulates neural inhibition, resulting in abolition of contractions in the esophageal body and complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, which is followed by peristalsis and the lower esophageal sphincter contraction. We assessed the relationship between MWS and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophageal symptoms and with normal findings by high‐resolution manometry (HRM). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who underwent HRM and a 24‐hour ambulatory impedance‐pH study. Correlation between the findings of the impedance‐pH study and abnormal MWS responses without motility disorders was evaluated. Independent t‐tests were used for statistical analysis. Of 28 patients, 20 (71%) had abnormal MWS responses: four (20%) had abnormal responses during MWS, six (30%) had abnormal responses after MWS, and 10 (50%) had abnormal responses both during and after MWS. Total acid exposure times were significantly longer in patients with abnormal MWS responses than in patients with normal MWS responses. In particular, upright acid exposure time and all reflux percent times were significantly longer in patients with abnormal MWS responses. However, bolus clearance time and longest reflux episode were not different between the two groups. Abnormal MWS responses predicted increased acid exposure times in patients with normal findings of HRM by the Chicago classification.     

Helicobacter pylori infection correlates with severity of reflux esophagitis: with manometry findings

The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in the development and exacerbation of reflux esophagitis was investigated. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, the severity of atrophic gastritis, and esophageal motility (determined by esophageal manometry by an infusion catheter method) were assessed in patients with mild (n = 46) and severe (n = 27) reflux esophagitis and subjects without reflux (n = 28). Compared with the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the non-reflux group, the prevalence in the mild and severe reflux groups (60.7%, 47.8%, and 14.8%, respectively) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower. Atrophic gastritis was milder in both reflux groups than in the non-reflux group. The degree of gastritis was also milder in the severe reflux group than in the mild reflux group. The esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the reflux groups than in the non-reflux group, and the amplitude of primary peristalsis was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the severe reflux group than in the non-reflux group. There were no significant differences between reflux patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection in the parameters of esophageal manometry. These data imply that a low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection may result in a milder grade of atrophic gastritis, and consequently, exacerbate reflux esophagitis. Received: July 21, 1998 / Accepted: April 28, 1999     

A comprehensive analysis of partial peristalsis recovery after peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia

Objective

To determine whether peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) improves esophageal peristalsis and to investigate the association between recovery of esophageal peristalsis after POEM and clinical features of the patients.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, data were collected from medical records of the patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between January 2014 and May 2016. Demographics data, high-resolution esophageal manometry parameters, Eckardt score, and gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) score were collected. Weak and fragmented contraction was defined as partial recovery of esophageal peristalsis based on the Chicago classification version 3.0. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with the partial recovery of peristalsis after POEM.

Results

A total of 103 patients were enrolled. Esophageal contractile activity was observed in the distal two-thirds of the esophagus in 24 patients. The Eckardt score, integrated relaxation pressure, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were significantly decreased after POEM. Multivariate analysis revealed that preprocedural LES resting pressure (P = 0.013) and preprocedural Eckardt score (P = 0.002) were related to the partial recovery of peristalsis after POEM. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and reflux esophagitis after POEM were less frequent in those with partial recovery of peristalsis (both P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Normalization of esophagogastric junction relaxation pressure achieved by POEM is associated with the partial recovery of esophageal peristalsis in patients with achalasia. Preprocedural LES resting pressure and the Eckardt score are predictive of the recovery of esophageal peristalsis.     

胃食管反流病食管外症状-咽喉炎的临床研究

目的 探讨胃食管反流病表现为咽喉炎患者24 h食管pH变化,并评价质子泵抑制剂（PPI）及选择性5-HT4受体部分激动剂的治疗效果.方法 对76例经内镜检查无食管糜烂等表现的顽固性慢性咽喉炎患者行食管测压及双通道24 h食管pH检测后,随机予PPI（奥美拉唑）或选择性5-HT4受体部分激动剂（替加色罗）治疗2周,比较治疗前后食管pH改变及临床症状评分改变.结果 76例患者中,38例食管pH异常（占50%）,其中18例经奥美拉唑治疗后,食管pH改变差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,临床症状亦有显著改善（P＜0.01）.19例经替加色罗治疗后,临床症状有显著改善（P＜0.01）,但食管pH无显著改变.38例食管pH正常,其中18例予奥美拉唑治疗,17例予替加色罗治疗,经2周治疗后,临床症状改善差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.食管pH异常或正常患者食管测压结果差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 部分胃食管反流病可表现为难治性慢性咽喉炎,予PPI（奥美拉唑）或选择性5-HT4受体部分激动剂（替加色罗）治疗后,可显著改善症状.     

Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Prolonged esophageal pH monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, some investigators have found that short-duration postprandial pH monitoring in the upright position is also useful, while others have failed to find such results. Therefore, we have compared a 6-hr period of pH monitoring (3-hr postprandial period after daytime meal and 3-hr supine period) with a total 24-hr period in detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. Sixty-five patients (44 men, mean age 41.3 years) with GERD and 16 healthy volunteers (11 men, mean age 34.3 years) underwent 24-hr pH monitoring according to a standard protocol. Various reflux parameters during 24-hr pH monitoring were compared with reflux parameters during the 6-hr period. Abnormal GER was detected in 56 patients presenting with typical symptoms of GERD (sensitivity 86.2%). These patients could be further divided into upright (N=18), supine (N=15), and combined (N=23) refluxers, depending on the posture in which abnormal reflux occurred. Esophageal pH monitoring during the 3-hr postprandial upright period showed abnormal reflux in only 35 patients (sensitivity 53.8%;P<0.00005, compared with the 24-hr pH monitoring period). Abnormal GER was identified in 13 of 18 upright, 19 of 23 combined, and only one of 15 supine refluxers, as well as in two of nine patients with normal 24-hr pH-metry. However, inclusion of the 3-hr supine monitoring period in the 3-hr postprandial upright period improved detection of abnormal GER to 78.5% (51 patients;P=NS compared with 24-hr pH monitoring period). This was related mainly to improved detection of abnormal GER in supine refluxers (11 of 15; 73.3%). Esophageal acid exposure time correlated significantly with severity of esophagitis only during the total and supine periods of both the 24- and 6-hr periods and not during the upright period. Esophageal acid clearance correlated significantly with increasing grades of esophagitis for the supine and total periods only. We conclude that 3-hr postprandial pH monitoring, as has been conventionally practiced, is not appropriate in the detection of abnormal GER; inclusion of a supine period in the short-duration pH monitoring schedule increases the detection of pathological reflux. We therefore recommend that a supine period should be included in short-duration pH monitoring schedules. We also found that supine reflux was the most important factor in the development of esophagitis.     

胃食管反流病患者酸反流与食管运动功能障碍的关系

背景：异常酸反流和食管运动功能障碍与胃食管反流病（GERD）密切相关。目的：研究GERD患者的食管运动和酸反流与食管黏膜损害的关系，以及两者之间的相关性。方法：选取有反酸、烧心、胸痛等典型胃食管反流症状的患者72例行上消化道内镜检查、食管测压和24hpH监测。根据pH〈4总时间百分比〈4．5％且DeMeester计分〈14．7的标准。将食管炎患者分为生理性酸反流组（pH^-组）和病理性酸反流组（pH^＋组）。结果：内镜下食管炎组24hpH监测各项指标较无食管炎组显著增高（P〈0．05），病理性酸反流的发生率显著高于无食管炎组（P〈0．01）。两组食管测压各项指标无显著差异，食管炎组pH^＋者的食管下括约肌压力（LESP）较pH^-者显著降低，食管体部蠕动波传导速度减慢，湿咽成功率减少（P〈0．05）。结论：GERD患者食管炎的发生与酸反流密切相关，有病理性酸反流的GERD患者易见食管运动功能障碍。     

Influence of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery at the Gastroesophageal Junction (the Stretta Procedure) on Symptoms,Acid Exposure,and Esophageal Sensitivity to Acid Perfusion in Gastroesophagal Reflux Disease

Several studies have demonstrated that radiofrequency energy delivery at the gastroesophageal junction (the Stretta procedure) induces symptom relief in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), although improvement of acid exposure on pH monitoring was usually limited. A role for decreased esophageal sensitivity has been suggested. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of Stretta on symptoms, acid exposure, and sensitivity to esophageal acid perfusion in GERD. Thirteen patients with established proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent GERD (three males; mean age, 51±10 years) participated in the study. Before and 6 months after the procedure symptom score, pH monitoring and Bernstein acid perfusion test were performed. The latter was done by infusing HCl (pH 0.1) at a rate of 6 ml/min 15 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction for a maximum of 30 min or until the patients experienced heartburn. Results were compared by Student’s t-test. Stretta procedure time was 51±4 min and no complications occurred. After 6 months, the symptom score was significantly improved (12.5±2.0 to 7.5±2.1; P<0.05), seven patients no longer needed daily PPI, and acid exposure was significantly decreased (11.6%±1.6% to 8.5%±1.8% of time pH<4; P<0.05). The time needed to induce heartburn during acid perfusion decreased from 9.5±2.3 to 18.1±3.4 min (P=0.01), and five patients became insensitive to 30-min acid perfusion, versus none at baseline (P=0.04). In conclusion, the Stretta procedure induces subjective improvement of GERD symptoms and decreases esophageal acid exposure. In addition, esophageal acid sensitivity is decreased 6 months after the Stretta procedure. The mechanism underlying this finding and its relevance to symptom control require further studies.     

Selection of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease for Antireflux Surgery Based on Esophageal Manometry

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and may be worsened by impaired esophageal peristalsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatment depending on the function of the LES and esophageal peristalsis. We studied 128 GERD patients with mild esophagitis. Group 1 (N = 26) consisted of patients with a normal LES and normal esophageal peristalsis. Group 2 (N = 63) comprised patients with a defective LES but normal peristalsis. Patients of group 3 (N = 39) had a defective LES as well as impaired esophageal peristalsis. The patients were continuously treated with omeprazole. Clinical evaluation and endoscopy were repeated after 3, 6, and 12 months. Recurrence of GERD was diagnosed if there was relapse of heartburn and/or esophagitis. The recurrence rate was 7.7% in group 1, 38.1% in group 2 (P < 0.05) and 79.5% in group 3 (P < 0.05). In conclusion, in GERD patients with a mechanically defective LES, especially in those with deteriorated esophageal peristalsis, antireflux surgery should be considered since medical therapy reveals a high recurrence rate.     

Esophageal motility in patients with sliding hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis

OBJECTIVE: To study the radiographic and esophageal motility changes that are characteristic of patients with both sliding hiatus hernia (HH) and reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Thirty patients were diagnosed with HH by using gastroscopy. These patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of their esophagitis: group HH1 (grades A and B, n= 18); group HH2 (grades C and D, n= 12). Sliding HH was confirmed by barium meal examination. Radiographic techniques were used to test for spasms and strictures, the coarseness of the mucosa, and to study the types of reflux and clearance. Esophageal pH (24‐h), lower esophageal sphincter pressure and the frequency and amplitude of esophageal peristalsis during reflux were also studied. RESULTS: Radiography revealed that the mucosa was coarse in all cases. Eighty percent of patients had sucking reflux and 36.7% had passive clearance. The percentages of total, supine and upright acid exposure times were greater in patients with HH than those in the controls (P < 0.01), but the difference between the HH1 and HH2 groups was not significant. Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure was less in the HH group than that in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in the length of the sphincter among groups. During episodes of acid reflux, the frequency and amplitude of peristalsis, and the percentage of normal primary esophageal peristalsis were all lower in HH patients than in the controls, and the duration of peristalsis was increased relative to that of the controls (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sucking reflux and passive clearance are very important in HH. Esophageal acid exposure time does not correlate with the severity of esophagitis. Lowered lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, decreased frequency and amplitude, and increased duration of esophageal peristalsis during the episode of reflux may play an important role in the pathogenesis of sliding HH.