Catheter ablation of focal triggers and drivers of atrial fibrillation

It has been demonstrated that most paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is triggered by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins (PVs). It has been recently reported that some AF episodes are maintained by focal drivers and AF substrates in the PVs and atrium. Left atrial ablation combined with PV isolation targeting AF triggers and drivers may be effective for eliminating atrial arrhythmias. However, multiple AF drivers in the PVs and atrium and acute conduction recovery after the PV isolation may sometimes render that technique less reliable. In this article, we describe the current status of the catheter ablation of focal triggers and drivers of AF in the PVs and atrium, illustrating with case presentations.     

在心房颤动持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性

探讨在心房颤动 (简称房颤 )持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性。 9例在导管消融术中房颤持续发作的房颤患者 ,根据肺静脉环状标测电极导管记录的肺静脉激动特征采用 2种方法进行肺静脉开口部的消融 :①肺静脉激动有序且有一种或多种固定的激动顺序 ,采用射频导管消融环状电极记录的最早的激动部位 ;②肺静脉激动无序或无明确的激动顺序 ,首先使用超声球囊导管消融 ,如未达终点再加用射频导管消融。 2种方法的消融终点均为肺静脉电学隔离。总计对 31根肺静脉进行了消融 ,其中 2 8根在房颤心律下消融。房颤心律下电隔离肺静脉的成功率为 92 .9% (2 6根 )。总操作时间和X线透视时间分别为 1 38± 2 1min和 38± 9min。本组无肺静脉狭窄及其他并发症。随访 6 .3± 2 .9(3～ 1 1 )个月后 ,4例 (44.4% )患者无房颤发作 (无需药物 )。结论 :在房颤持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术方法可行 ,且较为安全 ;联用超声球囊消融和射频消融对于房颤发作过程中无序或无明确激动顺序的肺静脉具有较好的电学隔离效果。     

Prospective study of atrial fibrillation termination during ablation guided by automated detection of fractionated electrograms

Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. One-year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long-term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.     

心房颤动导管消融复发患者二次消融研究

目的心房颤动（房颤）导管消融治疗仍然存在一定的复发率,而其复发的特点目前仍然不清,本文对房颤消融复发患者二次消融的特点进行分析。方法共442例房颤消融治疗患者中,29例消融后复发的患者[男性19例,年龄（56±11）岁],本文患者复发时间〉6个月。对这些复发患者进行二次导管消融治疗。分析和对比初次与二次消融的电生理特点。结果29例房颤患者（20例为阵发性房颤,9例为持续性房颤）复发时间6—33（11．3±5．3）个月,所有患者初次消融后均服用3个月抗心律失常药。在复发的29例患者中,（1）3例初次消融术采用单纯靶肺静脉电隔离,二次消融发现1例出现非消融肺静脉触发灶,予以补充消融;另2例发现原靶肺静脉均有传导恢复,予以所有肺静脉经验性电隔离。（2）12例初次消融策略为所有肺静脉（48根）经验性电隔离,二次消融时发现所有患者存在不同程度的肺静脉传导恢复（36根）,8例再次所有肺静脉节段电隔离（其中1例发现上腔静脉起源予以针对性电隔离）;4例患者采用三维标测系统指导下同侧肺静脉环形电隔离。（3）12例患者初次消融策略为三维标测系统指导下同侧肺静脉环形电隔离,二次消融时重复进行环肺静脉电隔离。1例患者术中发现左心房局灶性房性心动过速（房速）并成功消融,2例患者术中出现左心房不典型心房扑动（房扑）成功消融。二次消融术后随访（15±10）个月,5例患者出现房颤复发（阵发性房颤1例,持续性房颤4例;成功率82．8％）,1例患者出现严重左肺静脉狭窄。结论对于房颤进行肺静脉消融电隔离治疗,其复发患者以肺静脉传导恢复为复发的主要原因。单纯进行靶肺静脉消融的部分患者,其他肺静脉的触发灶对于复发起着重要的作用。部分复发患者与非肺静脉起源的触发灶相关。复发的房颤患者,再次导管消融治疗可以达到较高的治疗成功率。     

Is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation?

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a frequently used therapy after failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The cornerstone of AF ablation has been durable pulmonary vein isolation. However, understanding the positive and negative outcomes of catheter ablation of AF is severely limited by diverse ablation methodologies that do not seem to result in durable pulmonary vein isolation. Without durable pulmonary isolation ablation, it is unclear if ablation strategies need to be modified to include extrapulmonary vein ablation targets in combination with pulmonary vein isolation or alone to improve long-term procedural success rates. The marked discrepancy between AF ablation procedure success rates and actual long-term pulmonary vein isolation rates does suggest that targeting other mechanisms can be considered to achieve similar or better results when compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone.     

The stepwise ablation approach for chronic atrial fibrillation—Evidence for a cumulative effect

Treatment options for atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from simple, fluoroscopy-guided pulmonary vein isolation for those patients with paroxysmal AF to complex, multi-modality procedures targeting not only anatomic structures but also electrophysiologic phenomena including complex fractionated electrograms, sites of dominant frequency and local non-venous drivers in patients with persistent and permanent AF. The stepwise ablation approach is a novel technique whereby structures contributing to initiation and maintenance of AF are sequentially targeted by radiofrequency ablation. Broadly divided into pulmonary veins, left atrial (LA) roof, left atrium (incorporating all anatomic regions of the chamber), mitral isthmus and non-LA structures, each region is targeted in sequence and the impact of ablation upon the global fibrillatory process assessed by measurement of AF cycle length (AFCL) at a site remote from the ablation target. In addition to pulmonary vein electrical disconnection and demonstrable complete conduction block across the roof and mitral isthmus lines (when performed), ablation is performed at those sites displaying continuous electrical and complex fractionated activity, with the endpoint of local organization, as well as at sites displaying electrograms consistent with focal sources driving AF. Ablation is accompanied by a cumulative increase in the AFCL prior to termination of AF by conversion either directly to sinus rhythm or to an atrial tachycardia which is then mapped conventionally and ablated. There is a ceiling of ablation within the LA beyond which further ablation is unlikely to result in a clinical benefit and should prompt evaluation of the contribution of the right atrium to maintenance of AF. The stepwise approach benefits from the integration of anatomic and electrophysiologic information to achieve a high level of success in termination of chronic AF by catheter ablation.     

Preliminary results of a limited thoracotomy: new approach to treat atrial fibrillation

Objective: To determine efficacy of a new procedure combining epicardial bipolar radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation and ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Background: PV antrum electrical isolation and GP ablation have each been associated with elimination of AF. Both of these can be performed epicardially in a single combined surgical procedure, which may have advantages over endocardial ablation.
Methods and Results: Twenty-one subjects entered a prospective evaluation of limited thoracotomy epicardial bipolar PV antrum isolation, verified by PV recordings, with GP ablation, guided by GP mapping. Procedural success was defined as freedom from AF and antiarrhythmic agents during 1 year of follow-up, including evaluation by prolonged continuous monitoring capable of detecting asymptomatic arrhythmias. All subjects had recordable PV potentials and GP activity prior to ablation. Circumferential epicardial bipolar RF eliminated PV potentials in 18 of 20 right and 14 of 20 left PV antra. This concurrently eliminated 79% of GP activity (125 of 159 active sites); nearly all remaining GP activity could then be eliminated using epicardial bipolar RF forceps. Fifteen of 20 (75%) subjects overall, and 14 of 16 (87.5%) subjects with paroxysmal or persistent AF had a successful procedure.
Conclusion: Limited thoracotomy epicardial bipolar RF antrum isolation, verified by PV recordings, with GP ablation, guided by GP mapping, is effective treatment for AF and should be considered in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF.     

Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on the left-to-right atrial dominant frequency gradient in human atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated the existence of a left-to-right atrial dominant frequency gradient during paroxysmal but not persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in humans. One possible mechanism of the left-to-right dominant frequency gradient involves the role of the pulmonary veins (PVs) in AF maintenance. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of PV isolation on the dominant frequency gradient and outcome after PV isolation. METHODS: Patients with either paroxysmal or persistent AF were studied. Recordings were made from catheters in the coronary sinus (CS), posterior right atrium (RA), and posterior left atrium (LA) during AF before and after PV isolation. Mean left-to-right dominant frequency gradient was measured before and after segmental PV isolation. Patients were followed for AF recurrence after PV isolation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with paroxysmal (n = 15) or persistent (n = 12) AF were studied. In the paroxysmal group, baseline dominant frequency was greatest in the posterior LA with a significant left-to-right atrial dominant frequency gradient (posterior LA = 6.2 +/- 0.9 Hz, CS = 5.8 +/- 0.8 Hz, posterior RA = 5.4 +/- 0.9 Hz; P <.001). After PV isolation, there was no regional difference in dominant frequency (5.9 +/- 0.7 Hz vs 5.7 +/- 0.6 Hz vs 5.7 +/- 0.7 Hz, respectively; P = NS). In the persistent AF group, there was no overall difference in dominant frequency among sites before or after PV isolation (P = NS); however, patients with long-term freedom from AF after PV isolation had a higher left-to-right dominant frequency gradient compared with patients with recurrent AF (0.4 vs 0.1 Hz; P <.05). CONCLUSION: PV isolation results in a loss in the left-to-right dominant frequency gradient in patients with paroxysmal AF. This finding supports the critical role of PVs in the maintenance of ongoing paroxysmal AF. Patients with persistent AF and a baseline left-to-right dominant frequency gradient have a better success rate with PV isolation alone compared with patients without a dominant frequency gradient.     

Long-term evaluation of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by noninducibility

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and linear lesions are effective in eliminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but linear lesions probably are not required in all patients. Noninducibility of AF has been shown to be associated with freedom from arrhythmia in 87% of patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of noninducibility in guiding a stepwise approach tailored to the patient. METHODS: In 74 patients (age 53 +/- 8 years) with paroxysmal AF, PV isolation was performed during induced or spontaneous AF. If AF was inducible after PV isolation, one to two additional linear lesions were placed at the mitral isthmus and/or left atrial roof, with the endpoint of noninducibility of AF or atrial flutter. Inducibility (AF/atrial flutter, lasting > or = 10 minutes) was assessed using burst pacing at an output of 20 mA down to refractoriness from the coronary sinus and both atrial appendages. RESULTS: In 42 patients (57%), PV isolation restored sinus rhythm and rendered AF noninducible. In the 32 patients with persistent or inducible AF after PV isolation, a single linear lesion achieved noninducibility in 20, whereas two linear lesions were required in 12 and resulted in conversion to sinus rhythm and noninducibility in 10. Using this stepwise approach, a total of 69 patients (93%) were rendered noninducible. During follow-up of 18 +/- 4 months, 67 patients (91%) were free from arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs. Repeat procedures were performed in 23 patients: repeat ablation was required to consolidate prior targets in 15 patients (20%), and "new" linear lesions, which were not predicted by inducibility during the index procedure, were required in 8 (11%). CONCLUSION: Noninducibility can be used as an endpoint for determining the subset of patients with paroxysmal AF who require additional linear lesions after PV isolation. This tailored approach is effective in 91% of patients while preventing delivery of unnecessary linear lesions.     

Impact of pre-existent areas of complex fractionated atrial electrograms on outcome after pulmonary vein isolation

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers outside pulmonary veins (PV) may account for failure after PV isolation. The aim of this study was to characterize pre-existent areas of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) recorded in right atrium (RA) and in coronary sinus (CS) during catheter-based PV isolation and to assess their relation to outcome. Methods and results With a tricuspid annulus and CS mapping, CFAEs were retrospectively identified in consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation. Of 224 patients, 161 were found to have CFAEs (81%). No clinical variable was found to be predictive of CFAEs presence. By Kaplan–Meier analysis, following a median follow-up of 23.7 months after a single ablation procedure, 62.8% of patients in the CFAEs(+) group and 85.4% of those in the CFAEs(−) group were free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (p = 0.013). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that CFAEs evidence was an independent predictor of recurrence (p = 0.007). Conclusions Pre-existent CFAEs, that can be easily identified in RA and CS during PV isolation, are a powerful independent predictor for AF recurrence. This finding may be helpful for refining AF ablation strategies.     

Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Have We Achieved Cure with Pulmonary Vein Isolation?

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of current ablation techniques to eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF), with the greatest efficacy as a stand-alone procedure in patients with paroxysmal AF. Over the years, techniques for PVI have undergone a profound evolution, and current guidelines recommend PVI with confirmation of electrical isolation. Despite significant efforts, PV reconnection is still the rule in patients experiencing post-ablation arrhythmia recurrence. In recent years, use of general anesthesia with or without jet ventilation, open-irrigated ablation catheters, and steerable sheaths have been demonstrated to increase the safety and efficacy of PVI, reducing the rate of PV reconnection over follow-up. The widespread clinical availability of ablation catheters with real-time contact force information will likely further improve the effectiveness and safety of PVI. In a small but definite subset of patients, post-ablation recurrent arrhythmia is due to non-PV triggers, which should be eliminated in order to improve success. Typically, non-PV triggers cluster in specific regions such as the coronary sinus, the inferior mitral annulus, the interatrial septum, the left atrial appendage, the Eustachian ridge, the crista terminalis region, the superior vena cava, and the ligament of Marshall. Focal ablation targeting the origin of the trigger is recommended in most cases. Empirical non-PV ablation targeting the putative substrate responsible for AF maintenance with ablation lines and/or elimination of complex fractionated electrograms has not been shown to improve success compared to PVI alone. Similarly, the role of novel substrate-based ablation approaches targeting putative localized sources of AF (e.g., rotors) identified by computational mapping techniques is unclear, as they have never been compared to PVI and non-PV trigger ablation in an adequately designed randomized trial. This review highlights PVI techniques and outcomes in treating recurrent drug-refractory AF and discusses the potential role of additional non-PV ablation.     

Conducting Randomized Trials in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: Lessons from a Randomized Comparison of Recording Methods During Pulmonary Vein Isolation by Segmental Ostial Ablation

Accurate identification of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials during segmental ostial ablation for PV isolation is very important to completely isolate the PVs and also to avoid unnecessary applications of radiofrequency energy. A prior post hoc analysis of unipolar and bipolar electrograms recorded from successful and unsuccessful ablation sites demonstrated that unipolar electrograms recorded at successful sites were more likely to have a rapid intrinsic deflection, larger amplitude, and earlier activation than electrograms recorded at unsuccessful sites. Moreover, unipolar electrograms recorded from the ablation and circular ostial mapping catheters were almost identical at successful sites. Based on these observations, a prospective, randomized study was conducted to test whether unipolar and bipolar electrograms would facilitate the ablation procedure when compared to bipolar electrograms alone during PV isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In 44 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF, 114 PVs were randomized to segmental ostial ablation guided by unipolar and bipolar electrograms (61) or by bipolar electrograms only (53). Segmental ostial ablation guided by unipolar and bipolar electrograms was associated with a approximately 20-30% decrease in the procedure and fluoroscopy times necessary for isolation of a PV and also in the duration of radiofrequency energy application required for complete isolation of a PV. Although the sample size was not sufficient to detect a 5% change, the success rate for complete electrical isolation and the risk of symptomatic PV stenosis were similar between the 2 groups. Online analysis of unipolar electrograms facilitated the PV isolation procedure and was incremental to the analysis of bipolar electrograms alone. However, because segmental ostial ablation has only modest efficacy in achieving long-term freedom from recurrent AF, alternative ablation strategies that may or may not target PVs will eventually evolve. The role of unipolar electrograms in these new methods remains to be determined.     

A single pulmonary vein as electrophysiological substrate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Introduction: It has been demonstrated that pulmonary veins (PVs) play an important role in initiation and maintenance of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not clearly known whether a single PV acts as electrophysiological substrate for paroxysmal AF.
Methods and Results: This study included five patients with paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent complete PV isolation with continuous circular lesions (CCLs) around the ipsilateral PVs guided by a three-dimensional mapping system. Irrigated radiofrequency (RF) delivery was performed during AF on the right-sided CCLs in two patients and on the left-sided CCLs in three patients. The incomplete CCLs resulted in a change from AF to atrial tachycardia (AT), which presented with an identical atrial activation sequence and P wave morphology. Complete CCLs resulted in AF termination with persistent PV tachyarrhythmias within the isolated PV in all five patients. PV tachyarrhythmia within the isolated PV was PV fibrillation from the left common PV (LCPV) in two patients, PV tachycardia from the right superior PV (RSPV) in two patients, and from the left superior PV in one patient. All sustained PV tachyarrhythmias persisted for more than 30 minutes, needed external cardioversion for termination in four patients and a focal ablation in one patient. After the initial procedure, an AT from the RSPV occurred in a patient with PV fibrillation within the LCPV, and was successfully ablated.
Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, sustained PV tachyarrhythmias from a single PV can perpetuate AF. Complete isolation of all PV may provide good clinical outcome during long-term follow-up.     

Atrial fibrillation: Catheter ablation

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved dramatically over the last several years. The initial efforts in the catheter-based management of AF targeted the atrial substrate in an effort to mimic the maze procedure. After the pulmonary veins (PV) were shown to be critical in the initiation and perpetuation of AF, the focus then shifted to a trigger approach in which the PVs and other foci were targeted for ablation. The pendulum then appeared to swing back toward the substrate approach after it was shown that left atrial circumferential ablation afforded improved outcomes in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. It has become clear that there are several possible approaches in the catheter ablation of AF, each with its strengths and limitations. It is also becoming evident that not all patients will respond to a single ablation technique and that the ablation protocol is best tailored to suit the individual patient. This article strives to present an evidence-based review of the many techniques, and then offer a practical guide to the catheter ablation of AF.     

Pulmonary vein isolation using segmental versus electroanatomical circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that electroanatomic pulmonary vein (PV) antra encircling for the PV isolation will improve the outcome in treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), compared with segmental PV isolation. METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent segmental PV isolation (group 1) and 56 patients circumferential PV isolation (group 2) for symptomatic PAF in a randomized study. RESULTS: Following single ablation procedure, at the 48 +/- 8 month follow-up, 30 (56%) and 32 (57%) patients in groups 1 and 2 remained free of arrhythmia (P = 0.41). After repeat ablation, 43 (80%) and 45 (80%) patients in groups 1 and 2 were free of arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs); 48 (89%) and 51 (91%) patients in groups 1 and 2 did not have arrhythmia recurrences without or with AADs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates no advantage in long-term arrhythmia-free clinical outcome after circumferential PV isolation in patients with frequent PAF.     

Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging in patients with long-standing persistent AF. The clinical outcome and subsequent arrhythmia recurrence after using an ablation method targeting multiple left atrial sites with the aim of achieving acute AF termination has not been characterized. METHODS: Sixty patients (mean age: 53 +/- 9 years) with persistent AF (mean duration: 17 +/- 27 months) were prospectively followed after catheter ablation. Catheter ablation targeting the following sites was performed in a random sequence: (i) electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV); (ii) disconnection of other thoracic veins; (iii) atrial ablation at sites possessing complex electrical activity, activation gradients, or short cycle lengths. Finally, linear ablation of the LA roof and mitral isthmus was performed if sinus rhythm was not restored following energy delivery to the above sites. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation, patients underwent clinical review and 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring to identify asymptomatic arrhythmia. Repeat mapping and catheter ablation was performed in any patient experiencing recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT). Clinical success was defined as the absence of any sustained atrial arrhythmia. RESULTS: AF terminated during ablation in 52 patients (87%). The fluoroscopy and procedural durations were 84 +/- 30 minutes and 264 +/- 77 minutes, respectively. Three months after ablation, sustained ATs were documented in 24 patients (associated with AF in 2). Mapping in 23 patients showed a single AT in 7 while multiple ATs were observed in 16. Macroreentry was confirmed to be due to gaps in the ablation lines, while focal ATs originated from discrete sites or isthmuses near the left atrial appendage, coronary sinus, pulmonary veins, or fossa ovalis; these sites were similar to those at which the greatest impact was observed on the fibrillatory process during the initial ablation procedure. After repeat ablation, at 11 +/- 6 months of follow-up, 57 patients (95%) were in sinus rhythm and 3 developed recurrent AF or AT. All patients in sinus rhythm demonstrated improved exercise capacity and all but 2 had evidence of atrial transport as assessed by Doppler echocardiography (mitral A wave velocity 34 +/- 17 cm/sec) by 6 months. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent AF associated with acute AF termination achieves medium to long-term restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in 95% of patients. Arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients is AT.     

心房颤动射频消融术后继发房性心律失常的机制和对策

目的 研究心房颤动(AF)患者环肺静脉射频消融术后继发房性快速性心律失常(ATA)的机制和对策.方法 继发ATA 15例.左房各肺静脉逐一标测,对恢复心房-肺静脉传导的静脉补点消融,达到心房-肺静脉电隔离.成功后仍然存在或诱发ATA的则进行CARTO激动标测和拖带标测,并行辅线消融或局灶消融,直到不能诱发.结果 经电生理标测发现14例恢复了心房-肺静脉传导.相应补点消融后电隔离,9例不能再诱发,3例诱发了左房大折返心动过速,左房顶部/峡部消融后终止,1例诱发左房局灶心动过速,局灶消融后成功.2例诱发右房大折返心动过速,右房峡部消融后消失.术后随访1～16(5.5±4.4)个月,13例无复发,2例发作明显减少.结论 左房-肺静脉传导恢复是继发ATA的重要机制;其他机制还包括左房顶部、峡部、右房峡部依赖的大折返心动过速以及局灶房性心动过速等.对继发ATA,先检查肺静脉并补点消融很重要,但不能完全解决问题,尚需根据CARTO激动标测和拖带标测进行个体化的消融.     

Advanced mapping techniques in atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation has emerged as an excellent treatment option for atrial fibrillation especially in patients with paroxysmal AF. Several obstacles however remain regarding ablation strategies for persistent and chronic AF. In this setting, adequate success rates can only be achieved with left atrial ablation in addition to complete PV isolation. Important techniques in this regard are mapping of complex fractionated atrial electrograms as well as identification of atrial sites serving as sources of persistent AF. Other mapping techniques reviewed in this article are rapid geometry acquisition with spiral catheters and the Ensite/NAVX system, the 64-pole Constellation basket catheter as well as the MESH Mapper catheter.     

Reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedure duration during ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel anatomical navigation system.

AIMS: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is centred on pulmonary vein (PV) ablation with or without additional atrial substrate modification. These procedures may be prolonged with significant fluoroscopy exposure. This study evaluates a new non-fluoroscopic navigation system during ablation of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-two patients undergoing catheter ablation of symptomatic drug refractory AF were prospectively randomized to ablation with (n=35; study group) or without (n=37; control group) non-fluoroscopic navigation. PV isolation was performed in all patients. In patients with persistent or inducible sustained AF after PV isolation linear ablation was performed by joining the superior PVs. PV isolation was achieved in all patients; fluoroscopy (15.4+/-3.4 vs. 21.3+/-6.4 min; P<0.001) and procedural (52+/-12 vs. 61+/-17 min; P=0.02) durations were significantly reduced in the study group. Linear block was achieved in 37 of the 39 patients; with a significant reduction in fluoroscopy (5.6+/-2.2 vs. 9.9+/-4.8 min; P=0.003) and procedural (14.7+/-5.5 vs. 26.6+/-16.9 min; P=0.007) durations in the study group. After a follow-up of 6.9+/-2.9 months (range 3-10), 26 (74%) patients in the non-fluoroscopic navigation group and 29 (78%) patients in the control group were arrhythmia-free after the first procedure. CONCLUSION: This prospectively randomized study demonstrates significant reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedural duration using supplementary non-fluoroscopic imaging system for AF ablation.     

Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms responsible for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PV) by segmental ostial ablation. BACKGROUND: Recovery of conduction into a previously isolated PV is a common observation when there is recurrent AF soon after segmental ostial ablation. However, the mechanisms of recurrent AF have been unclear. METHODS: A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 50 patients who had recurrent paroxysmal AF at a mean of 7 +/- 6 months after segmental ostial ablation to isolate the PVs. During the repeat procedure, a ring catheter was inserted into each PV during sinus rhythm and AF to determine whether the veins were still isolated and, if not, whether there were PV tachycardias with a cycle length shorter than in the adjacent left atrium during AF. RESULTS: There was recovery of conduction over a previously ablated muscle fascicle in >/=1 PV in 49 patients (98%). There were 10 +/- 2 episodes of PV tachycardia per minute in 36 (72%) of the 50 patients during AF. Repeat ablation was performed by segmental ostial ablation (23 patients) or by left atrial catheter ablation to encircle the left- and right-sided PVs 1 to 2 cm from the ostia, with additional ablation lines in the posterior left atrium and mitral isthmus (27 patients). At 6-month follow-up, among 23 patients who underwent repeat ablation by segmental ostial ablation, AF recurred in 4 (21%) of the 19 patients who had PV tachycardias and in 3 (75%) of the 4 patients who did not (P = .03). Among the 27 patients who underwent left atrial ablation, AF recurred in 2 (12%) of the 17 patients who had PV tachycardias and in 1 (10%) of the 10 patients who did not (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of conduction in previously ablated muscle fascicles is a common finding in patients with recurrent AF after segmental ostial ablation. The efficacy of repeat segmental ostial ablation depends on the presence of PV tachycardias, whereas left atrial ablation is effective regardless of whether PV tachycardias are present or not during AF.