New method of hepatic regeneration

Postoperative liver failure (PLF) is the most feared and serious complication after extensive liver resections. We present an innovative surgical technique for the treatment of a patient with colorectal cancer and initially unresectable liver metastases. After completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it was decided to perform simultaneous surgery. A left hemicolectomy and cleaning of the metastases in the left liver was performed. As the future liver remnant (FLR) was insufficient, it was decided to perform an in situ liver split and a right portal vein ligation. On the 6^th day after the surgery a volumetric CT showed an increase greater than 40% of the FLR. The right hepatectomy was completed and the patient was discharged on the 11^th day after surgery. The technique induced a rapid growth of the FLR, exceeding that reported using portal occlusion. If these findings are corroborated in future studies, this revolutionary technique could enable surgery to be performed in two stages on patients with initially unresectable liver disease during the same hospital admission and without PLF.     

Liver Resection for Noncolorectal,Nonneuroendocrine Metastases

In noncolorectal, nonendocrine liver metastases, the role of surgery is less define than in colorectal or neuroendocrine cancer. This role is marginal as liver is not the primary site of metastases of these cancers. Less than 2 to 5% of the patients with these malignancies might be one day considered as potential candidates for liver resection, as most patients suffer from extra hepatic tumour spread at the time they develop liver involvement. However, in these few cases with liver metastases only, as no other therapeutic option may provide mid-or long-term tumour-free survival, liver resection is indicated in resectable liver metastases. Some prognostic factors have been established in the literature from the few published series: unique versus multiple hepatic metastases, unilobar vs bilobar, metachronous vs synchronous, R0 vs R1 or R2 liver resections. The type of primary tumour is also of great importance, as cutaneous melanoma, pancreatic and gastric adenocarcinoma have a very bad prognosis for liver resection of metastases, even after R0 resection. In these cases, percutaneous or laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation may find its place. In sarcoma, breast carcinoma, uveal melanoma, and genitourinary cancers, liver resection may provide satisfactory long-term results in selected cases, and is the standard of care for isolated, resectable metastasis. However, due to the scarcity of indication of liver resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases, the decision should be multidisciplinary, and the patients should be informed of the advantages and pitfalls of the surgical procedure.     

Liver resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases

In noncolorectal, nonendocrine liver metastases, the role of surgery is less define than in colorectal or neuroendocrine cancer. This role is marginal as liver is not the primary site of metastases of these cancers. Less than 2 to 5% of the patients with these malignancies might be one day considered as potential candidates for liver resection, as most patients suffer from extra hepatic tumour spread at the time they develop liver involvement. However, in these few cases with liver metastases only, as no other therapeutic option may provide mid- or long-term tumour-free survival, liver resection is indicated in resectable liver metastases. Some prognostic factors have been established in the literature from the few published series: unique versus multiple hepatic metastases, unilobar vs bilobar, metachronous vs synchronous, R0 vs R1 or R2 liver resections. The type of primary tumour is also of great importance, as cutaneous melanoma, pancreatic and gastric adenocarcinoma have a very bad prognosis for liver resection of metastases, even after R0 resection. In these cases, percutaneous or laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation may find its place. In sarcoma, breast carcinoma, uveal melanoma, and genitourinary cancers, liver resection may provide satisfactory long-term results in selected cases, and is the standard of care for isolated, resectable metastasis. However, due to the scarcity of indication of liver resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases, the decision should be multidisciplinary, and the patients should be informed of the advantages and pitfalls of the surgical procedure.     

Strategies to increase the resectability of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Liver resection can provide long-term survival and cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases but is feasible in only 15-25% of patients. In the last few years several major developments have contributed to increase this resectability rate. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can provide response rates as high as 50%, allowing surgery in about 10-15% of patients initially deemed unresectable. Patients requiring extensive liver resections with an anticipated small residual liver volume can undergo portal vein embolization to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure by inducing hypertrophy of the remnant liver. Extensive bilobar disease can be treated by two-stage hepatectomy, with an interval to allow liver regeneration. Ablation techniques can be combined with hepatic resection to reduce local recurrence from incomplete surgical resection margins or to destroy contralateral tumor deposits. Finally, for patients with tumors involving the inferior vena cava or the hepatic veins, in which conventional resection is not feasible, in situ hypothermia or bench resection with reimplantation are suitable for very selected patients. Downstaging strategies may increase the resectability rate of colorectal liver metastases by over 20%.     

Liver resection and transplantation — Therapeutic concepts in surgical treatment of hepatic metastases

Summary Background: Surgical procedures such as liver resection or liver transplantation are the only treatment modalities that provide a chance of cure for patients with liver metastases. Methods: This report reviews results of liver resection and liver transplantation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumors as compared to the natural course. Results: Overall 5 year survival after curative liver resection for colorectal metastases ranges between 25 and 48%. The operative mortality is between 0 and 5%. Risk factors for tumor recurrence are more or less defined. Reresections of metastases can be performed with comparable mortality rates and results. Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal metastases offers a median survival of 28 months, but the chance of cure only for individual patients. Exclusion of patients with positive lymph nodes of the primary tumor improves median survival. As there are alternative treatment options for neuroendocrine metastases, indication for liver resection or transplantation is not clearly defined, but the chance of cure by means of surgical treatment should not be missed. Curative resections of neuroendocrine liver metastases can achieve 5-year survival rates of more than 80%. Conclusions: Radical surgical removal of liver metastases from colorectal and neuroendocrine cancer can improve the prognosis for selected patients. Further improval is expected from a multimodal approach.      

Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: After technical advances in hepatic surgery and laparoscopic surgery, some teams evaluated the possibilities of laparoscopic liver resections. The aim of our study was to assess the results of laparoscopic left lateral lobectomy (bisegmentectomy 2-3) and to perform a case-control comparison with the same operation performed by open surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From 1996 to 2002, 60 laparoscopic resections were performed in selected patients, including 18 left lateral lobectomies. The resected lesions were benign tumors, hepatocellular carcinomas with compensated cirrhosis, and metastases. Surgical procedures were performed with a harmonic scalpel, an ultrasonic dissector, linear staplers, and portal pedicule clamping when necessary. Results were compared with those of patients who underwent open left lateral lobectomies selected from our liver resection database in a case-control analysis. Both groups were similar for age, type and size of the tumor, and presence of underlying liver disease. RESULTS: Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic left lateral lobectomies were associated with a longer surgical time (202 versus 145 minutes, p < 0.01), a longer portal triad clamping (39 versus 23 minutes, p < 0.05), and a decreased blood loss (236 versus 429 mL, p < 0.05). There were no deaths in either group, and the morbidity rates were 11% in the laparoscopic group and 15% in the open group. There were no specific complications of hepatic resection after laparoscopy (no hemorrhage, subphrenic collection, or biliary leak), but some were observed in the open group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety of laparoscopic left lateral lobectomy. Despite longer operation and clamping time, without any clinical consequences, the laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased blood loss and absence of specific complications of the hepatic resection.     

The ALPPS technique for bilateral colorectal metastases: three “variations on a theme”

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility of technical variations of the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy technique (ALPPS) with regard to three different ways of liver splitting. The ALPPS technique was applied in the classic form consisting in ligation of the right portal vein, limited resections on the left lobe and splitting along the umbilical fissure; the right lobe was removed 1 week later. The first variation was “left ALPPS”: ligation of the left portal vein, multiple resections on the right hemiliver and splitting along the main portal fissure. The second variation was “rescue ALPPS”, consisting in simple splitting of the liver along the main portal fissure several months after a radiological portal vein embolization that did not allow satisfactory liver hypertrophy. The third variation was “right ALPPS”, consisting in ligation of the posterolateral branch of right portal vein, left lateral sectionectomy, multiple resections on the right anterior and left medial section and splitting along the right portal fissure. In all cases auxiliary deportalized liver was removed 1 week later. 4 patients with colorectal metastases were included. Morbidity was defined according to the Clavien–Dindo classification: grade I (2 events), grade IIIb (1 event). Postoperative mortality was nil. Median follow-up was 4 months and to date all patients are still alive. ALPPS technique, in its “classical” and modified forms, is a good option for selected patients with bilateral colorectal metastases and represents a feasible alternative to classical two-stage hepatectomy.     

A standardized technique for right segmental liver resections

HYPOTHESIS: The indications for segmental liver resections are increasing. This type of procedure can be performed by deep wedge transparenchymal transection or by the intrahepatic approach, reaching the portal pedicle through the hilar plate. We devised a systematized way to perform such an operation. DESIGN: Original surgical technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients (8 men and 6 women; mean age, 55 years) underwent right segmental liver resections between July 1, 2001, and July 31, 2002. Seven patients had liver metastasis, 3 had primary liver cancer, 3 had benign lesions, and 1 had gallbladder cancer. The surgery was performed by making 3 small incisions around the hilar plate. With a standardized method, the right posterior and anterior sheaths were reached by combining these incisions. RESULTS: Right segmental liver resection was feasible with the proposed technique in all patients. Intraoperative blood loss was minimal in all cases, and 11 patients did not require blood transfusion. There was no postoperative death. CONCLUSIONS: This operative procedure standardizes the intrahepatic approach to the right portal pedicle for right segmental resections. It may reduce bleeding at the site of hilar plate incisions and the need for main hepatic pedicle clamping and may facilitate the recognition of right posterior and anterior sheaths, with excellent immediate results.     

Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resections. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of the laparoscopic approach for liver resections has remained limited for technical reasons. Progress in laparoscopic procedures and the development of dedicated technology have made it possible to consider laparoscopic resection in selected patients. METHODS: A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken in patients with preoperative diagnoses including benign lesion, hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis, and metastasis of noncolorectal origin. Hepatic involvement had to be limited and located in the left or peripheral right segments (segments 2-6), and the tumor had to be 5 cm or smaller. Surgical technique included CO2 pneumoperitoneum and liver transection with a harmonic scalpel, with or without portal triad clamping or hepatic vein control. Portal pedicles and large hepatic veins were stapled. Resected specimens were placed in a bag and removed through a separate incision, without fragmentation. RESULTS: From May 1996 to December 1999, 30 of 159 (19%) liver resections were included. There were 18 benign lesions and 12 malignant tumors, including 8 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients. Mean tumor size was 4.25 cm. There were two conversions to laparotomy (6.6%). The resections included 1 left hepatectomy, 8 bisegmentectomies (2 and 3), 9 segmentectomies, and 11 atypical resections. Mean blood loss was 300 mL. Mean surgical time was 214 minutes. There were no deaths. Complications occurred in six patients (20%). Only one cirrhotic patient developed postoperative ascites. No port-site metastases were observed in patients with malignant disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resections are feasible and safe in selected patients with left-sided and right-peripheral lesions requiring limited resection. Young patients with benign disease clearly benefit from avoiding a major abdominal incision, and cirrhotic patients may have a reduced complication rate.     

Resection of liver metastases from breast cancer: towards a management guideline

In selected patients with colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases, the outcome of liver resection is well established with 5-year survival rates ranging from 25% to 60%. However, the role of liver resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine (NCRCE) liver metastases has not been fully established. Liver metastases in breast cancer are common and a small number of those patients may be suitable for surgical resection. There have been some case series with low mortality and morbidity and prolonged survival after liver resection. We performed this review to evaluate the overall and disease free survival after liver resections for breast metastases. Extensive search of Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane database was performed and data was analysed. Although mostly case series with smaller number of patients, outcome has been comparable to colorectal liver metastases in selected group of patients with 5 years survival rate at the range of 20%-60% with main prognostic factors of being the absence of extrahepatic disease (in exception of isolated pulmonary and bony metastasis) and to achieve an R0 resection.     

Multimodal treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas and the ampulla of Vater

Neuroendocrine tumors are not seen frequently. They are most commonly located in the small bowel including the vermiform appendix. Neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin are extremely rare. Symptoms caused by excessive hormone production by large liver metastases often lead to their diagnosis. Preoperative diagnostics include analysis of specific hormones in serum and urine, ultrasound, CT and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas are common at the time of diagnosis. Curative resection should be performed whenever possible, although patients often benefit from debulking procedures, too. Liver metastases can be subjected to surgical resection, embolization, regional chemotherapy or local procedures such as alcohol injection or cryoablation. As an exception, liver transplantation can be considered in selected cases where radical surgery for the primary tumor could be performed and extrahepatic metastases are not present. Supplementary or alternative options include octreotide and/or interferon-alpha administration. In this article, we report on 6 patients suffering from primary neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas or the ampulla of Vater who were treated at our department over the past 5 years. In addition, we discuss our own experience with this rare condition in the light of the recent literature.     

Hepatic Colorectal Metastases Involving Infra-Hepatic Inferior Vena Cava in High Risk Patients for Extended Resection: An Alternative Method for Achieving Radical Resection in Patient with Borderline Liver Remnant

Resection is the only chance of cure for isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer. In the case of extended parenchymal resections, one crucial point is the ischemic damage to the remnant liver. We report an alternative technique for extremely extended liver resections without total hilar clamping for borderline liver remnants. Two patients presented with invasion of the infrahepatic vena cava, both with an estimated live remnant ≤20 %. The crucial point of the technique is the absence of a portal triad clamping in under beating heart-extracorporeal circulation. In both patients resection margins were free of disease. No signs of liver insufficiency were noted. Survival was more than 2 years in both cases. We believe that aggressive treatment of liver colorectal metastases should be given to all suitable patients. This operation may be added to the techniques that can be offered to these patients.     

Chirurgische Therapie von Lebermetastasen

The treatment of liver metastases has become more and more complex in recent years. More individualized therapeutic concepts have become feasible by the increase in different treatment options (surgical, interventional and oncological). In the field of surgery the definition of resectability could be broadened. More extensive liver resections are being performed, which are partly carried out as staged resections after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with portal vein embolization (PVE), radio frequency ablation (RFA) or other procedures in order to increase complete resection rates and patient survival. Consequently the overall 5 year survival rate of patients with resected colorectal liver metastases has doubled from 30% to nearly 60% in the past decade. Due to the complexity of the different treatment approaches an interdisciplinary assessment of the individual patient in experienced centers is necessary.     

Hepatic resections for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine metastases. Results of 32 hepatectomies in 27 patients

STUDY AIM: Liver resections for metastases are commonly performed in colorectal primary tumors and poorly documented in non colorectal tumors. The aim of this study was to report a series of 32 liver resections in 27 patients for different types of non colorectal, non neuroendocrine liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1986 to 1997, 27 patients (20 women and 7 men, mean age: 56.8 years) were operated on in the same center for liver metastases. Initial cancer was female genital tract (ovarian and fallopian tube) adenocarcinomas (n = 5), gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas (n = 8), sarcomas (n = 8), and miscellaneous cancers (n = 6). Liver resections included atypical resections (n = 9), right hepatectomies (n = 11), extended right hepatectomies (n = 2), left hepatectomies (n = 4) and resections of 2 or 3 segments (n = 6). RESULTS: There was no perioperative death. Postoperative morbidity included 8 complications in seven patients, requiring reintervention in three patients. Follow-up was complete for all patients. Survival rate at one, two and five years was 59, 44 and 29% respectively. The longest median survival time was observed in genital tract adenocarcinomas (27 months), whereas the other types of malignancies had a 13- to 17-month mean survival rate. CONCLUSION: These results are almost similar to those observed in liver resections for colorectal metastases. Some carefully selected patients may benefit from liver resection for non colorectal, non neuro-endocrine metastases.     

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Influence on survival of preoperative factors and surgery for recurrences in 80 patients.

This report analyses an experience with 80 liver resections for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Primary colorectal cancers had all been resected. Liver metastases were solitary in 44 patients, multiple in 36 patients, unilobar in 76 patients, and bilobar in 4 patients. Tumor size was less than 5 cm in 33 patients, 5-10 cm in 30 patients, and larger than 10 cm in 17 patients. There were 43 synchronous and 37 metachronous liver metastases with a delay of 2-70 months. The surgical procedures included more major liver resections (55 patients) than wedge resections (25 patients). Portal triad occlusion was used in most cases, and complete vascular exclusion of the liver was performed for resection of the larger tumors. In-hospital mortality rate was 5%. Three- and 5-year survival rates were 40.5% and 24.9%, respectively. None of the analysed criteria: size and number of liver metastases, delay after diagnosis of the primary cancer, Duke's stage, could differentiate long survivors from patients who did not benefit much from liver surgery due to early recurrence. Recurrences were observed in 51 patients during the study, two thirds occurring during the first year after liver surgery. Eight patients had resection of "secondary" metastases after a first liver resection: two patients for extrahepatic recurrences and six patients for liver recurrences. Encouraging results raise the question of how far agressive surgery for liver metastases should go.     

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS): A two staged procedure,in Bogotá Colombia. Case report and literature review

IntroductionFor liver tumors (primary or metastases), surgery combined with neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy is the treatment of choice, offering long term survival time and disease-free time period (Alvarez et al., 2012) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation, or ALPPS, it's a surgical technique that increases the future liver remnant in a short period of time, trying to avoid postoperative liver failure (PLF), and achieving R0 resections in liver malignant tumors (Alvarez et al., 2012).Presentation of the caseA 43 years old woman with colorectal liver metastases in both lobes. Colorectal surgical procedure was performed 1 year previous the liver intervention, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Decision of a tri-segmental hepatectomy was made to resolve the metastases. Into the surgical procedure, we evaluated the liver parenchyma, and the future liver remnant tissue was insufficient, for that reason we decided to perform ALPPS procedure.DiscussionColorectal liver metastases (CLRM) are considered the most common indication for ALPPS procedure according to the international registry. Compared with the portal vein ligation, resection rate varies from 50 to 80%, and the non-resectability disease was explained by tumor progression. Postoperative mortality rate was 5.1% in young patients (<60 years old), and 8% in general for CRLM. Oncologic outcomes represent an increased disease-free survival period and overall survival time compared with non-surgical approach.ConclusionThe ALPPS procedure it's an interesting approach to patients with not enough liver remnant tissue, with good oncologic results in terms of disease-free survival time, and overall survival. Appropriate selection of the patient, careful postoperative management, and a multidisciplinary approach are related with good postoperative outcomes.     

Morbidity and mortality of aggressive resection in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy about the treatment of patients with malignant advanced neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas and duodenum. Aggressive surgery remains a potentially efficacious antitumor therapy but is rarely performed because of its possible morbidity and mortality. HYPOTHESIS: Aggressive resection of advanced neuroendocrine tumors can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and may lead to extended survival. DESIGN: The medical records of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2002 by a single surgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, were reviewed in an institutional review board-approved protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical procedure, pathologic characteristics, complications, mortality rates, and disease-free and overall survival rates were recorded. Disease-free survival was defined as no tumor identified on radiological imaging studies and no detectable abnormal hormone levels. Proportions were compared statistically using the Fisher exact test. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival rates. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified (11 men and 9 women). Of these, 10 (50%) had gastrinoma, 1 had insulinoma, and the remainder had nonfunctional tumors; 2 had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, and 1 had von Hippel-Lindau disease. The mean age was 55 years (range, 34-72 years). In 10 patients (50%), tumors were thought to be unresectable according to radiological imaging studies because of multiple bilobar liver metastases (n = 6), superior mesenteric vein invasion (n = 3), and extensive nodal metastases (n = 1). Tumors were completely removed in 15 patients (75%). Surgical procedures included 8 proximal pancreatectomies (pancreatoduodenectomy or whipple procedure), 3 total pancreatectomies, 9 distal pancreatectomies, and 3 tumor enucleations from the pancreatic head. Superior mesenteric vein reconstruction was done in 3 patients. Liver resections were done in 6 patients, and an extended periaortic node dissection was performed in 1. The spleen was removed in 11 patients, and the left kidney was removed as a result of tumor metastases in 2. Eighteen patients had primary pancreatic tumors, and 2 had duodenal tumors; 2 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 had both pancreatic and duodenal tumors. The mean tumor size was 8 cm (range, 0.5-23 cm). Of the patients, 14 (70%) had lymph node metastases and 8 (40%) had liver metastases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.5 days (range, 6-26 days). Six patients (30%) had postoperative complications. There was a significantly greater incidence of pancreatic fistulas with enucleations compared with resections (P =.04). There were no operative deaths. The mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 1-96 months); 18 patients (90%) are alive, 2 died of progressive tumor, and 12 (60%) are disease-free. The actuarial overall survival rate is 80% at 5 years, and disease-free survival rates indicate that all tumors will recur by the 7-year follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgery including pancreatectomy, splenectomy, superior mesenteric vein reconstruction, and liver resection can be done with acceptable morbidity and low mortality rates for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Although survival rates following surgery are excellent, most patients will develop a recurrent tumor. These findings suggest that conventional contraindications to surgical resection, such as superior mesenteric vein invasion and nodal or distant metastases, should be reconsidered in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.     

Innovative application of radiofrequency in hepatic surgery. Preliminary experience

Intraoperative blood loss has long been identified as one of the major morbidity and mortality predictors in liver surgery. A new approach towards achieving bloodless resection is the use of heat coagulative necrosis in healthy liver tissue, creating a zone of necrosis in which resection can be performed with a scalpel. We have used it for a variety of liver resections ranging from wedge resection to trisegmentectomy to establish the best indications. From March 2005 to June 2006 we performed 31 liver resections on 22 consecutive patients using this method. The most common indication was metastatic colorectal cancer (77.2%). We treated a heterogeneous patient series in terms of tumour location and extent of resection. Resectability was enhanced by means of downsizing chemotherapy (2 cases) and induction of portal hypertrophy (1 case). Twelve patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy after the primary operation according to histological staging. Metastatic liver disease was synchronous in 7 cases and metachronous in 8 (mean time to metastasis 25.3 months). The operative spectrum ranged from parenchyma-saving atypical resections to extended right hepatectomy. With two exceptions, intraoperative blood loss was lower than 100 ml. Four patients (18.2%) developed surgery-related complications consisting in abscess formation at the resection site. Liver resection using the sealer device would appear to be a safe, time-efficient method, though it requires extensive knowledge of the anatomy of the intrahepatic vessels. Resections in the proximity of hilar structures or large vessels are not indicated for fear of thermal damage. Extended resections are possible if performed with a hybrid technique with conventional hilar preparation. In our experience this new application of radiofrequency-assisted liver resection seems to be effective and safe and may afford a number of advantages (no blood loss, short resection time. etc.) in selected cases.     

Preoperative imaging of liver metastases. Comparison of angiography, CT scan, and ultrasonography.

Thirty-one patients with mostly colorectal cancer metastases to the liver had preoperative selective/superselective angiograms (24 cases), computed tomography (CT) [26 cases, mostly enhanced by contrast administered by a peripheral vein (9), the common hepatic artery (9), or the portal vein (5)], and ultrasonography (26 cases). Intraoperative ultrasonography and palpation and examination of the resected specimens revealed 113 tumors. CT detected almost half of the masses smaller than 1 cm, and ultrasonography and angiography about one-third of lesions 1-2 cm in size. Ultrasonography was less powerful for examination of the posterior segment of the liver. CT and ultrasonography placed the tumors into subsegments more accurately than did angiography. Almost 40% of the preoperative plans had to be changed: in two-thirds by extended resections and in one-third by a change from curative to palliative intent. Most changes were due to extrahepatic tumor growth, often within areas screened before surgery. The use of all three imaging modalities for liver metastases is recommended for preoperative planning.     

转移性肝癌的腹腔镜肝切除术

目的探讨转移性肝癌的腹腔镜肝切除术经验。方法对1997年至2004年度布里斯班医院所进行的所有肝切除术患者进行回顾性研究。结果有84例患者进行了腹腔镜肝切除，其中33例（39％）为恶性肿瘤。33例中28例为转移性，其中22例为结直肠癌转移。13例患者进行左肝外侧叶切除，9例患者进行了右半肝切除，其余6例行肝段或不规则切除。67％失去随访，追踪随访12例患者2年存活率和无瘤生存率为75％和67％。结论在高度选择过的恶性肿瘤患者中行腹腔镜肝切除术是可行的。但要求术者有丰富的开腹肝切除术经验和腹腔镜操作技能。