Reliability of Minute Ventilation as a Parameter for Rate Responsive Pacing

A minute ventilation sensing rate responsive pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients with bradycardias. Their mean age was 59 +/- 4 years (mean +/- SEM). The pacemaker measures minute ventilation by sensing intravascular impedance using a standard bipolar electrode. The rate responsive programming was simple: apart from ascribing an upper and lower rate, the only programmable parameter was the slope of rate response. This could be derived approximately by assessing the suggested slope value during an exercise test in the 'adaptive VVI' mode. Compared with exercise in the VVI mode, symptom limited treadmill tests in the rate responsive mode showed a 33% improvement of exercise capacity and a 44% improvement of cardiac output as determined noninvasively by continuous wave Doppler measurements of the ascending aortic blood flow. The pacing rate was appropriately increased during a variety of daily activities such as walking at different speeds and gradients, and ascending and descending stairs. Voluntary interference of the respiratory pattern such as during coughing and hyperventilation increased the pacing rate from a resting rate of 70 bpm to 111 +/- 10 and 86 +/- 4 bpm respectively. Continuous talking during exercise attenuated the expected rate response. The pacemaker can sense activity induced by arm swinging. In conclusion, the Meta pacemaker improved cardiac output and exercise capacity in patients with bradycardias. Its rate response was related to workload. Although voluntary interference affected the pacing rate, excessive rate acceleration was not encountered.     

Rate Responsive Cardiac Pacing Using a Minute Ventilation Sensor

A minute ventilation sensing rate responsive pacemaker was implanted in 15 patients (8 males and 7 females)with bradycardia. The mean age was 72.8 ± 8.7 years. The single chamber system measures transthoracic impedance between the tip electrode of a standard bipolar lead and the pulse generator case. In the adaptive mode the pulse generator calculates a rate responsive factor or slope during maximal exercise but /unctions as in the VVI mode. The patients exercised maximally on an upright cycle ergometer with the pacemaker programmed to VVI mode, adaptive mode, and rate responsive mode. Exercise and gas exchange data were collected continuously and analyzed using an automated breath-by-breath system. The slope, heort rate, and ventilation were measured every 20 seconds. Heart rate in pacemaker dependent patients correlated well to minute ventilation (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.72–0.95, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrates that minute ventilation is a good metabolic sensor in rate responsive pacing.     

Dual Sensor VVIR Mode Pacing: Is It Worth It?

Dual sensor ventricular demand rate responsive (VVIR mode) pacing was compared with single sensor rate responsive pacing to assess whether this new development should be more widely incorporated in modern pacemaker devices. A within patient randomized, double-blind crossover study involving ten patients, mean age 67.4 years (70% male), had Medtronic Legend Plus dual sensor VVIR pacemakers implanted for high grade A V block and chronic or persistent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Performance values were compared to 20 healthy control subjects of a similar age and gender. Patients were both subjectively and objectively assessed after 2 weeks of out-of-hospital activity in VVIR mode (minute ventilation sensing), VVIR mode (activity sensing), VVIR mode (dual sensor), and VVI mode (no rate response). All patients were assessed for subjective preference for, and objective improvement in, any pacing modality as assessed by standardized daily activity protocols and graded exercise treadmill testing. Subjective perception of exercise capacity and functional status was significantly lower in VVI mode (P < 0.05) compared to any of the VVIR modes, which did not differ. After completion of the study 70% of patients chose VVIR as their preferred mode, with 30% expressing no preference. Forty percent preferred activity sensor WIR mode pacing, 30% preferred dual sensor VVIR mode pacing, and 70% found either dual sensor WIR mode, minute ventilation sensor WIR mode, or both modalities least acceptable. No patient found activity sensing WIR mode least acceptable. Graded treadmill testing revealed significantly lower exercise tolerance during WI mode pacing (P < 0.01) compared to the VVIR modalities, which did not differ. Overall, chronotropic response was best with dual sensor pacing during standardized daily activity protocols and during the standard car journey. The data from this study suggest that there is no marked clinical advantage obtained from the use of dual sensor devices over current activity sensing ventricular demand rate responsive pacemakers, but with the probable added disadvantages of increased size, complexity, cost, and decreased longevity.     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

Initial Clinical Experience with a Single Pass VDDR Pacing System

Although ventricular rate adaptive pacing (VVIR) improves exercise capacity and cardiac output compared to constant rate ventricular pacing (WI), this pacing mode does not provide benefit of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. We evaluated the use of a custom-built VDDR pacing system using a single pass, ventricular lead, which detects end cavity P wave using a pair of diagonally arranged atrial bipolar (DAB) electrodes. In the VDDR mode, AV synchrony is enabled and the P wave rate is used in conjunction with an accelerometer based activity sensor for rate adaptive pacing. A VDDR pacemaker was implanted in three patients with complete AV block (mean age 63 ± 1 year) and the mean implantation time was 29 minutes. Mean P wave amplitude was 2.4 mV (1.2–4.2 mV) at implantation and telemeter P wave amplitude was stable over a follow-up of 6 months. At a sensitivity of 0.2 mV, stable P wave sensing was observed during breathing maneuvers, arm swinging, my potential induction, and Holter recording. Paired exercise tests performed in the VDDR and VVIR modes showed higher cardiac output at rest, during exercise, and in the recovery period in the VDDR pacing mode. Thus VDDR pacing using a single pass lead is superior to VVIR pacing by enabling P synchronous ventricular pacing without adding to the complexity of implantation.     

Atrial Arrhythmia Management with Sensor Controlled Atrial Refractory Period and Automatic Mode Switching in Patients with Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacemakers

Although a long postventricular atrial refractory period fPVARP) may prevent the occurrence of pacemaker mediated tachycardias and inadvertent tracking of atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber (DDD) pacing, the maximum upper rate will necessarily be compromised. We tested the feasibility of using minute ventilation sensing in a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (DDDR) to shorten the PVARP during exercise in 13 patients with bradycardias (resting PVARP = 463 ± 29 msec) to avoid premature upper rate behavior. Graded treadmill exercise tests in the DDD and DDDR modes at this PVARP resulted in maximum ventricular rates of 98 ± 8 and 142 ± 3 beats/min, respectively (P < 0.0001), due to chronotropic incompetence and upper rate limitation in the DDD mode, both circumvened with the use of sensor. In order to simulate atrial arrhythmias, chest wall stimulation was applied for 30 seconds at a rate of 250 beats/min at a mean unipolar atrial sensitivity of 0.82 mV. Irregular ventricular responses occurred in the DDD mode fthe rates at a PVARP of 280 and 463 ± 29 msec were, respectively 92 ± 5 and 66 ± 3 msec; P < 0.0001). In the DDDR mode at a PVARP of 463 ± 29 msec, regular ventricular pacing at 53 ± 2 beats/min occurred due to mode switching to VVIR mode in the presence of repetitive sensed atrial events within the PVARP. One patient developed spontaneous atrial fibrillation on follow-up, which was correctly identified by the pacemaker algorithm, resulting in mode switch from DDDR to regular VVIR pacing and preservation of rate response. In conclusion, sensor controlled PVARP allows a long PVARP to be used at rest without limiting the maximum rate during exercise. In addition, to offer protection against retrograde conduction, a long PVARP and mode switching also limit the rate during atrial arrhythmias and allow regular ventricular rate responses according to the physiological demands.     

An Integrated Dual Sensor System Automatically Optimized by Target Rate Histogram

The use of combined sensors and advanced algorithms using different principles can improve rate performance over a single sensor system. Combinations of sensors and more sophisticated algorithms, however, invariably increase the complexity of pacemaker programming. An automatically optimized combined minute ventilation and activity DDDR pacemaker was developed to minimize repeated sensor adjustment. The device used subthreshold (below cardiac stimulation threshold) lead impedance to detect lead configuration at implantation automatically, followed by "implant management," including setting of lead polarity and initiation of DDDR pacing. Automatic sensor adaptation was achieved by programming a "target rate histogram" based on the patient's activity level and frequency of exertion, and the rate profile optimization process matched the recorded integrated sensor response to the target rate histogram profile. In nine patients implanted with the DX2 pacemakers, the implant management gave 100% accuracy in the detection of lead polarity. Rate profile optinuzation automatically increased the pacing rate during exercise between discharge and 3-month follow-up (hall walk: 78 ± 3 vs 98 ± 3 beats/min, and maximal treadmill exercise: 89 ± 6 vs 115 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.001) with a significant increase in exercise duration during maximal exercise (7.18 ± 1 min vs 9.56 ± 2 min, P = 0.05). The accuracy of rate profile optimization versus manual programming was assessed at 1 month, and there was no significant difference between pacing rate kinetics and maximal pacing rate between the two methods of programming. In conclusion, pacemaker automaticity can be initiated at implantation and the self-optimized rate adaptive response appeared to be comparable to that derived from a manual programming procedure, which may reduce the need to perform time consuming sensor programming.     

Evaluation of a New Rate Adaptive Ventricular Pacemaker Controlled by Double Sensors

The LEGEND-PLUS, a new rate adaptive pacemaker that combines activity and minute ventilation sensing for automatic rate adaptation was implanted in the right ventricle (VVIR) in 11 patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years). Initial programming was performed using the Programmer Exercise Protocol (a 3-minute walk). This programming was evaluated by treadmill tests, up-stairs and down-stairs walking, and Holier recordings. Results: Following the final programming of LEGEND-PLUS, the mean upper activity rate was 102 ± 7 beats/rain (range 90–120 beats/min), while the mean upper minute ventilation rate was 125 ± 16 beats/min (range 100–150 beats/min). The mean rate responses during the exercise protocol and the final programming in minute ventilation and activity sensing modes were 5.4 ± 2.3 (range 1–9), versus 4 ± 2.4 (range 1–8; P < 0.01) and 7.6 ±1.1 (range 5–9), versus 7.5 ± 0.8 (range 6–9; P = 0.8), respectively. In the combined sensing mode, the acceleration rate was identical to the activity rate response and the deceleration rate mimicked the minute ventilation. Conclusion: Dual sensor VVIR pacemakers have the potential to improve rate adaptation to exercise. The rate response to exercise in patients fitted with activity and minute ventilation sensors, VVIR pacemakers closely mimics the physiological rate response.     

Atrial Synchronized Ventricular Pacing: Contribution of the Chronotropic Response to Improved Exercise Performance

In contrast to asynchronous ventricular pacing (VOO, VVI), alrial synchronized ventricular pacing (VAT, VDD, DDD) maintains the normal sequence of cardiac chamber activation and permits a chronotropic response to exercise. thereby improving exercise performance. To assess the separate contributions of these two factors to improved work capacity. 14 patients with implanted programmable VAT pacemakers were exercised according to the Bruce protocol, in three different pacing modes, selected in a random orderand on a double blind basis: (a) VAT: (b) chest wall stimulation triggered ventricular (V-CWS-T) pacing, during which the pacemaker was programmed to VAT mode but driven externally using chest wall stimulation at rates fractionally above the patients'atrial rate, thereby providing a chronotropic response to exercise without atrioventricular synchronization; and (c) VOO mode at 70 beats per minute. There was a significant improvement in exercise performance in all patients during both VAT and V-CWS-T pacing as compared to VOO mode; the average increase in work capacity being similar: VAT: 44 ± 31, (range, 12 to 140) percent and V-CWS-T; 40 ± 24 (range, 5 to 85) percent. It is concluded that in patients with adaptive pacing systems, the chronotropic response is the major determinant of any improvement in exercise performance.     

Initial Experience with a New Single Chamber, Dual Sensor Rate Responsive Pacemaker

In August 1991, a new single chamber pacemaker became available that utilizes information from two sensors, activity and stimulus-to-T wave (QT) interval. We are reporting on the first 90 implants in 21 centers. T wave sensing was adequate at implantation in 88/90 patients, with a safety margin of > 100% in 86/90, Activity sensing was adequate in all patients. The contribution of each sensor fsensor blending) is programmable for each patient. Of 75 patients assessed at 1 month after implant, three have been programmed to "Activity-Only" mode, and 72 to dual sensor mode. Of these, 18 have been programmed to "QT < Activity," 48 to "QT = Activity," and 6 to "QT > Activity." Forty-five patients underwent exercise testing in dual sensor mode and a subgroup of 15 also underwent exercise testing in Activity-Only mode. The dual sensor mode produced a more gradual increase in pacing rate. Sensor Cross Checking^tmsatisfactorily prevented a sustained high pacing rate in tests of false-positive activity sensing (tapping, vibrating pacemaker, or static pressure). The maximum pacing rate on walking downstairs (94.2 ± 7.2 ppm) was similar to that produced by walking upstairs (91.6 ± 5.9 ppm). We conclude that initial assessment of this dual sensor, single chamber, rate responsive pacemaker confirms that the algorithm for combining data from two sensors functions satisfactorily. Dual sensor rate responsive pacing may offer significant advantages over single sensor devices, and further studies of this novel device are indicated.     

Respiratory-Dependent Pacing: A Dual Response From A Single Sensor

Five patients with respiratory dependent rate responsive pacemakers (Biorate HDP3, Biotec) were studied using ambulatory telemetry to evaluate the sensitivity of this pacing system to nonrespiratory signals. In each case the pacemaker was implanted in the left infraclavicular position with an impedance sensing electrode inserted into the subcutaneous tissues of the anterior chest wall. The pacing rate was 73 ± 2 beats per minute at rest and rose by 42 ± 5 beats per minute when the patients were walking with both arms swinging (mean ± SEMJ. Three of the five patients had sensing electrodes that extended across the midline. In this subgoup, pacing rate rose by 26 ±4 beats per minute when walking with arms held immobile and by 36 ± 2 beats per minute during sustained voluntary hyperventilation. These same activities did not elicit any appreciable changes in pacing rate in the remaining two patients whose sensing electrodes were confined to the left hemithorax. Recordings taken from all jive patients while they were standing upright and regularly swinging one upper limb showed an increase in pacing rate of 15 + 6 beats per minute with movement of the right arm and 46 + 8 with movement of the left. These observations establish that the Biorate RDP3 pacemaker is capable of responding both to changes in respiratory rate and to movement of the upper limbs. The sensitivity to limb movement is greatest when the chest wall impedance sensor does not extend across the midline and is most evident when the arm ipsilateral to the pacemaker is swung. This anomalous response may have a profound effect on pacing rate during certain forms of exercise and must be taken into account when programming the pacemaker to meet the heart rate requirements of individual patients.     

Rate-Responsive Ventricular Pacing: Clinical Experience With the RS4-SRT Pacing System

Eighteen patients (11 men and 7 women) with symptomatic second or third degree atrioventricular block underwent implantation of the rate-responsive RS4-SRT pacing system. Exercise tolerance in RS4 mode was compared to that in VVI mode by randomized double-blind treadmill stress testing. Following hospital discharge, HS4 function was assessed by repeat exercise testing and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Difficulty in obtaining satisfactory P-wave amplitudes at implonfation (mean 3.1 ±1.5 mV) resulted in prolonged implantation times (mean 79.4 ± 26.4 minutes). Following implantation, 10 patients (58%) showed a significant ventricular rate response to exercise, seven did not, and one remained in sinus rhythm. For responders, peak ventricular paced rate and double product were significantly greater in RS4 than in VVI mode, being 101.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.3 ± 0.4 beats per minute and 20.1 ± 2.9 vs. 15.5 ± 3.7 beats per minute ± mmHg ± 10⁻³, respectively (p < 0.001). However, treadmill times (10.5 ± 2.6 vs. 9.7 ± 3.3 minutes) and work done (5.51 ± 2.01 vs. 4.97 ± 2.33 joules ± 10⁻⁵) were not significantly different (p = 0.22). Following hospital discharge, repeat exercise testing and 24-hour Holter monitoring demonstrated RS4 junction in 11 of 16 and 15 of 18 patients, respectively. We conclude that, due to unreliable atrial sensing, the RS4-SRT pacing system does not provide the reliable rate-responsiveness required to improve exercise tolerance.     

A Randomized, Single-Blind Crossover Comparison of the Effects of Chronic DDD and Dual Sensor VVIR Pacing Mode on Quality-of- Life and Cardiopulmonary Performance in Complete Heart Block

The aim of this study was to compare DDD and dual sensor VVIR (activity and QT) pacing modes in complete AV block (CAVB). Eighteen patients (14 men and 4 women, aged 70 ± 6.5 years) implanted with a dual chamber, dual sensor pacemaker for CAVB with normal sinus node chronotropic function were studied. A quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptom questionnaire, and a treadmill exercise test were completed after a period of VVIR and a period of DDD pacing, each lasting 1 month. Overall quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptoms did not significantly differ, though three patients felt discomfort during VVIR mode. There was no significant statistical difference in Cardiopulmonary parameters. DDD and VVIR modes yielded the following respective data: maximum heart rate = 105.7 ± 21.8 beats/minute versus 107.6 ± 21.6 beats/minute (NS); maximum workload = 60 ± 33.4 W versus 59.3 ± 37.8 W (NS); treadmill duration = 10.1 ± 3.8 minute versus 10.1 ± 3.6 minute (NS); oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold = 14.6 ± 4.1 ml/kg per minute versus 14.9 ± 4.6 mL/kg per minute (NS); maximum minute ventilation = 49.6 ± 9 L/min versus 46 ± 12 L/min (NS); and respiratory quotient = 1.08 ± 0.15 versus 1.08 ± 0.13 (NS). We conclude that, during a 1-month follow-up period, no difference was found between DDD and dual sensor VVIR (QT and activity) pacing modes in CAVB patients with regard to quality-of-life and Cardiopulmonary performance, though a trend toward an increased sense of well being was noted with the DDD mode.     

Reliability of the Evoked Response in Determining the Paced Ventricular Rate and Performance of the QT or Rate Responsive (TX) Pacemaker

The TX pacemaker uses a conventional transvenous electrode to sense T-waves of paced ventricular complexes and it adapts the pacing rate to varying physiological demands by responding to changes in the QT or, more correctly, the stimulus artifact-to-T-wave (stimulus-T) interval. This pacing system was assessed in 13 patients. The relation between heart rate and stimulus-T interval and the effect of programming on the performance of this pacemaker were studied on several occasions in each patient. Treadmill exercise performance during TX pacing mode was compared with atrial synchronized ventricular (VAT) and asynchronous ventricular demand (VOO and VVI--70 beats per minute) pacing modes. T-wave sensing problems arose in three patients. In one, this was overcome by reducing the pulse amplitude from 5.0 to 2.5 V. In another patient, spontaneous recovery of T-wave sensing occurred 5 months after pacemaker implantation. T-wave sensing deteriorated with the passage of time in most patients. Satisfactory rate response as assessed by treadmill exercise testing and Holter monitoring was achieved in 12 patients through adjustments of two programmable parameters: the slope that defines the alteration in heart rate in response to a millisecond change in stimulus-T interval and the "sensing window" that is the interval during which T-waves can be sensed and a rate response is possible. Exercise performance was significantly better during rate responsive pacing (TX) mode as compared with VVI pacing but was comparable to that during VAT pacing. The resting heart rate/stimulus-T interval can be described by the following linear regression equation: stimulus-T interval = 466 - 1.68 X paced-rate, r2 = -0.62. This relation, however, was subject to wide inter- and intra-patient variation. Consequently, given identical programmed parameters and exercise protocol, the chronotropic response differed significantly from patient to patient and in the same patient from one occasion to another. Our results show that a physiologically beneficial chronotropic response can be achieved in most patients. However, reprogramming, based on results of exercise tests and Holter monitoring, may be necessary to adjust for changes in T-wave sensing and the heart rate/stimulus-T interval relation and, thus to ensure that the pacemaker continues to function optimally.     

New Integrated Sensor Pacemaker: Comparison of Rate Responses Between an Integrated Minute Ventilation and Activity Sensor and Single Sensor Modes During Exercise and Daily Activities and Nonphysiological Interference

A dual sensor DDDR pacemaker (DX2 Model 7970, Medtronic Inc.) has integrated the rate response of minute ventilation (MV) and activity (ACT) sensors. False rate acceleration by the ACT (constrained upper rate) and MV (cross-checked by ACT) is reduced. We examined the rate response profile and rate kinetics of the automatically optimized integrated sensor by comparing with the projected rate response of ACT and MV sensors alone in nine patients. After 1 month of sensor optimization using rate profile optimization (RPO), patients underwent maximal and submaximal treadmill exercises and performed activities of daily living (ADL). The integrated sensor mode gave a faster speed of rate response with a shorter delay time, time to 50% rate response and time to 90% of rate response compared to the MV sensor during hall walk (0.37 ± 0.08, 0.7 ± 0.09, 1.43 ± 0.19 vs 1.11 ± 0.1, 1.75 ± 0.14, 2.91 ± 0.17 min; P < 0.05), The average maximal sensor rates were significantly more proportional for the integrated sensor mode compared with either the ACT or MV mode. There was no significant difference in both the maximal pacing rate among the three sensor modes during maximal exercise and the rate decay during recovery. During interference studies by arm swinging (30–40 swings/min) and external tapping of the pacemakers (2 taps/s), there was only a moderate increase in pacing rate by 13 ± 9, 16 ± 5 beats/min. Hence, the new integrated sensor with the automatic rate profile optimization algorithm resulted in improved rate response profiles during submaximal exercise and ADL compared to the individual sensor response, and the sensor blending and cross-checking algorithm made the pacemaker relatively immune to false triggering of both the ACT and MV sensors.     

Respiratory-Dependent Atrial Pacing, Management of Sinus Node Disease

The effectiveness of respiratory-dependent atrial pacing (AAI-RD) was assessed in 23 patients (11 male, 12 female; 68 ± 10 years) with symptomatic isolated sinus node disease (SND). Follow-up was performed at 3 month intervals and included history taking, physical examination, ECG recording and 24-hour Holter monitoring. An incremental treadmill exercise test was performed in 21/23 patients before pacemaker implantation, in 23/23 patients after implantation (at least two tests with different programmed settings of respiratory rate/paced rate ratio); 21/23 patients underwent treadmill tests during both fixed rate 70 bpm and AAI-RD pacing. Physiological sensitivity of AAI-RD pacing was found excellent in 34 tests (85%) and fair in six (15%). Spontaneous heart rate was significantly higher after pacemaker implantation fbpm 115 ± 20 vs 98 ± 24, P < 0.001). In 10/21 patients paced rate was significantly higher during AAI-RD vs AAI pacing (131 ±9 vs 106 ± 16, P < 0.001) with better total work time (min 9.9 ± 4 AAI-RD vs 6.8 ± 2.6 AAI, P < 0.002), higher oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (ml/min 1137 ± 406 AAI-RD vs 882 ± 268 AAI-RD vs 5.5 ± 2.6 AAI, P - 0.001). No significant difference was found in 7/21 patients (overlap between spontaneous and paced rate during both AAI-RD and AAI programming); 4/21 patients did not reach anaerobic threshold owing to osteomuscular limitations. AV block was detected in 1/23 patients, Biorate circuital failure in 1/23, sporadic undersensing in 5/23, short and symptom-free myopotential inhibitions in 10/23. We concluded that AAI-RD pacing is a reliable, safe and useful modality in pacemaker management of isolated SNA, especially in patients with abnormal rate response to exercise.     

Behavior of a Respiratory Driven Pacemaker and Direct Respiratory Measurements

In 10 patients with a mean age of 76 +/- 8 years, a rate responsive pacemaker (Meta-MV, Telectronics) was implanted in the left pectoral site. An exercise test was performed in SSI ("adaptive") mode, allowing the device to measure the changes in thoracic impedance. The "slope number" at maximal exercise was chosen to program the pacemaker for a second exercise test in rate responsive mode. Direct measurements of respiratory rate and minute volume were correlated with the pacing rate. After 1 minute of exercise, pacing rate increased by 6% and it decreased smoothly after maximal exercise. The programmed maximal rate was reached at the maximum exercise level in six patients. During 24-hour Holter recording, the mean maximal pacing rate was 103 +/- 18 beats/min. For individual patients, a good correlation of pacing rate with respiratory rate (r = 0.757), oxygen consumption (r = 0.731), and minute volume (r = 0.800) was observed. The data from the entire group showed a highly significant correlation of changes in pacing rate and in respiratory parameters for different levels of exercise and recovery. In a subgroup of five patients, the slope numbers at maximal exercise were reproducible after 10 months. It was concluded that minute volume and its changes were recognized in a reliable way by the Meta-MV pacemaker.     

Benefits and Limitations of Rate Adaptive Pacing Under Laboratory and Daily Life Conditions in Patients with Minute Ventilation Single Chamber Pacemakers

Rate adaptive pacing has been shown to improve hemodynamic performance and exercise tolerance during acute testing. However, there remain concerns about its benefit in daily life and possible complications incurred by unnecessary pacing. This double-blind crossover study compared the benefit of rate adaptive (SSIR) versus fixed rate (SSI) pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in 20 rate incompetent patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers (META II). The heart rate (HR) response during three different exercise tests (treadmill, bicycle ergomctry, walking test) was correlated with the Holler findings during daily life in either pacing mode. The maximal HR was significantly higher in the SSIR-mode compared to the SSI-mode, both during laboratory testing (treadmill: 123 ± 15 vs 93 ± 29 beats/min: ergometry: 118 ± 15 vs 89 ± 27 beats/min; walking test: 127 ± 9 vs 95 ± 26 beats/min, all P values < 0.01) as well as during daily life (Holter: 126 ± 13 vs 103 ± 24 beats/min, P < 0.01). On Holter, the average HR (71 ± 14 vs 71 ± 8 beats/min) and the percentage of paced rhythm (54 % vs 62%, SSI- vs SSIR-mode, P = NS) were not different in either mode. However, despite a 30% rate gain in the SSIR-mode, the exercise capacity remained unchanged, and only 38% of patients preferred the SSIR-mode. Minute ventilation pacemakers provide a physiological rate response to exercise. Irrespective of the protocol used, the findings of laboratory testing are comparable to those during daily life. However, patient selection for rate adaptive single chamber pacing should be made with caution, since the objective benefit of restoring normal chronotropy may subjectively be negligible for most patients.     

Effects of Chronotropic Responsive Cardiac Pacing on Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Patients with Complete AV Block

To identify the effect of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on the ventilatory response to exercise, ten selected patients with complete atrioventricular block underwent paired cardiopulmonary exercise tests in fixed rate ventricular (WI) and dual chamber (DDD) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes. Compared to VVI pacing, DDD or VVIR pacing increased peak oxygen uptake (P < 0.005) and augmented anaerobic threshold (P < 0.001), In eight patients, dyspnea was the major symptom limiting exercise with VAT pacing and this was markedly attenuated with DDD or VVIR pacing. In all patients, ventilation (VE) and the ratio of ventilation to CO₂ production (VE/VCO₂) were consistently higher with VVI pacing during exercise. To compare the response of the two pacing modes at the same workloads in an aerobic condition, we measured ventilatory variables 1 minute prior to the anaerobic threshold obtained with VVI pacing. When DDD or VVIR pacing was compared with VVI pacing, VE and VE/VCO₂ significantly decreased from 20.5 ± 5.3 L/min to 18.3 ± 5.0 L/min (P < 0.005) and from 35.9 ± 5.8 to 31.9 ± 5.0 (P < 0.003), respectively. Respiratory frequency rose significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.001) despite an unchanged tidal vohame. Although peak VE did not differ between the two pacing modes, VE/VCO₂ at the peak exercise increased significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005). Respiratory frequency also rose more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005) and tidal volume did not change. This study suggests that chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing attenuates the exertional dyspnea by improving the ventilatory response to exercise as well as increasing the cardiac output in patients with complete atrioventricular block.     

Rate-Adaptive Cardiac Pacing in Children Using a Minute Ventilation Biosensor

YABEK, S.M., ET AL.: Rate-Adaptive Cardiac Pacing in Children Using a Minute Ventilation Biosensor. Chronotropic integrity is required for a normal cardiac output response to exercise. We evaluated a rate-adaptive ventricular demand pacemaker (Telectronics, META-MV) which uses minute ventilation as the sensed physiological variable for adjusting pacing rate, in seven young patients with a mean age of 11.4 years. All patients had clinically significant bradycardia related to complete heart block (n = 4) or sinus node dysfunction (n = 3). For the entire group, paced heart rates increased from 70 ± 10 beats/min to 151 ± 19 beats/min with exercise testing. The onset of rate adaptation took < 30 seconds. Changes in paced rate were linearly related to workload, VO₂ (5.9 to 20.7 mL/min/kg) and minute ventilation (8–65 L/min). The decline in pacing rate after exercise was related directly to the gradual decrease in minute ventilation and VO₂. Our data show that minute ventilation closely and accurately reflects the metabolic demands of varying workloads in children and can be used to achieve physiological, rate-adaptive pacing.