Postoperative outcomes of lung transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies

OBJECTIVESFew studies have evaluated the outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) in recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). This study investigated the postoperative changes in preformed DSAs based on prospectively collected data of DSAs, and the influences of preformed DSAs on postoperative outcomes among LTx recipients. Open in a separate windowMETHODSBetween July 2010 and December 2019, 216 recipients underwent LTx (81 living-donor lobar lung transplants and 135 deceased-donor lung transplants). We reviewed 8 cases with preformed DSAs to determine postoperative changes in DSAs and compared postoperative outcomes between recipients with and without DSAs.RESULTSThe preoperative mean fluorescence intensity of preformed DSAs ranged from 1141 to 14 695. Two recipients experienced antibody-mediated rejection within 2 weeks after LTx. DSAs disappeared in 7 recipients; however, 1 recipient experienced the relapse of DSAs and died from chronic lung allograft syndrome (CLAD), whereas 1 recipient had persisting DSAs within the study period and died from CLAD. Neither overall survival (OS) nor CLAD-free survival was significantly different between recipients with and without DSAs (P = 0.26 and P = 0.17, respectively). However, both OS and CLAD-free survival were significantly lower in recipients with DSAs against HLA class II than in those without these antibodies {5-year OS: 25.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9–66.5%] vs 72.1% (95% CI: 63.8–78.9%), P = 0.030 and 5-year CLAD-free survival: 26.7% (95% CI: 1.0–68.6%) vs 73.7% (95% CI: 66.5–79.5%), P = 0.002}.CONCLUSIONSPrognosis in recipients experiencing the relapse of preformed DSAs and those with persisting DSAs may be poor. The recipients with anti-HLA class II preformed DSAs had a significantly worse prognosis.     

Retrospective analysis on incidence and risk factors of early onset acute kidney injury after lung transplantation and its association with mortality

ObjectivesAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after lung transplantation (LTx) which is closely related to the poor prognosis of patients. We aimed to explore potential risk factors and outcomes associated with early post-operative AKI after LTx.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 136 patients who underwent LTx at our institution from 2017 to 2019. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors related to AKI. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI after LTx. Secondary outcomes were associations between AKI and short-term clinical outcomes and mortality.ResultsOf the 136 patients analyzed, 110 developed AKI (80.9%). AKI was associated with higher baseline eGFR (odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.03)) and median tacrolimus (TAC) concentration (OR 1.15 (95% CI: 1.02–1.30)). Patients with AKI suffered longer mechanical ventilation days (p = .015) and ICU stay days (p = .011). AKI stage 2–3 patients had higher risk of 1-year mortality (HR 16.98 (95% CI: 2.25–128.45)) compared with no-AKI and stage 1 patients.ConclusionsOur results suggested early post-operative AKI may be associated with higher baseline eGFR and TAC concentrations. AKI stage 1 may have no influence on survival rate, whereas AKI stage 2–3 may be associated with increased mortality at 1-year.     

HLA Matching at the Eplet Level Protects Against Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Donor selection in lung transplantation (LTx) is historically based upon clinical urgency, ABO compatibility, and donor size. HLA matching is not routinely considered; however, the presence or later development of anti‐HLA antibodies is associated with poorer outcomes, particularly chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Using eplet mismatches, we aimed to determine whether donor/recipient HLA incompatibility was a significant predictor of CLAD. One hundred seventy‐five LTx undertaken at the Alfred Hospital between 2008 and 2012 met criteria. Post‐LTx monitoring was continued for at least 12 months, or until patient death. HLA typing was performed by sequence‐based typing and Luminex sequence‐specific oligonucleotide. Using HLAMatchmaker, eplet mismatches between each donor/recipient pairing were analyzed and correlated against incidences of CLAD. HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5+DQA/B eplet mismatch was a significant predictor of CLAD (hazard ratio [HR] 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–8.29 p < 0.001). When bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) were analyzed independently, HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5 + DQA/B eplet mismatch was shown to significantly predict RAS (HR 8.3, 95% CI: 2.46–27.97 p < 0.001) but not BOS (HR 1.92, 95% CI: 0.64–5.72, p = 0.237). HLA‐A/B eplet mismatch was shown not to be a significant predictor when analyzed independently but did provide additional stratification of results. This study illustrates the importance of epitope immunogenicity in defining donor–recipient immune compatibility in LTx.     

Kidney Transplantation in Previous Heart or Lung Recipients

Outcomes after heart and lung transplants have improved, and many recipients survive long enough to develop secondary renal failure, yet remain healthy enough to undergo kidney transplantation. We used national data reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to evaluate outcomes of 568 kidney after heart (KAH) and 210 kidney after lung (KAL) transplants performed between 1995 and 2008. Median time to kidney transplant was 100.3 months after heart, and 90.2 months after lung transplant. Renal failure was attributed to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in most patients. Outcomes were compared with primary kidney recipients using matched controls (MC) to account for donor, recipient and graft characteristics. Although 5-year renal graft survival was lower than primary kidney recipients (61% KAH vs. 73.8% MC, p < 0.001; 62.6% KAL vs. 82.9% MC, p < 0.001), death-censored graft survival was comparable (84.9% KAH vs. 88.2% MC, p = 0.1; 87.6% KAL vs. 91.8% MC, p = 0.6). Furthermore, renal transplantation reduced the risk of death compared with dialysis by 43% for KAH and 54% for KAL recipients. Our findings that renal grafts function well and provide survival benefit in KAH and KAL recipients, but are limited in longevity by the general life expectancy of these recipients, might help inform clinical decision-making and allocation in this population.     

National Healthcare Delivery Systems Influence Lung Transplant Outcomes for Cystic Fibrosis

Successful lung transplantation (LTx) depends on multiple components of healthcare delivery and performance. Therefore, we conducted an international registry analysis to compare post‐LTx outcomes for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients using the UNOS registry in the United States and the National Health Service (NHS) Transplant Registry in the United Kingdom. Patients with CF who underwent lung or heart–lung transplantation in the United States or United Kingdom between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2011 were included. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of healthcare system and insurance on mortality after LTx. 2,307 US LTx recipients and 451 individuals in the United Kingdom were included. 894 (38.8%) US LTx recipients had publically funded Medicare/Medicaid insurance. US private insurance and UK patients had improved median predicted survival compared with US Medicare/Medicaid recipients (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, US Medicare/Medicaid insurance was associated with worse survival after LTx (US private: HR0.78,0.68–0.90,p = 0.001 and UK: HR0.63,0.41–0.97, p = 0.03). This study in CF patients is the largest comparison of LTx in two unique health systems. Both the United States and United Kingdom have similar early survival outcomes, suggesting important dissemination of best practices internationally. However, the performance of US public insurance is significantly worse and may put patients at risk.     

Impact of donor and recipient factors on allograft survival in lung transplantation: A single-center analysis

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear which donor and recipient factors influence long-term allograft function in lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: From October 1988 to February 2005, a total of 280 recipients underwent LTx at our center. Donor data and cause of death (CoD) were analyzed. The CoD was categorized according to rate of increase in intracranial pressure at the time of death. Each donor and recipient factor was correlated with long-term graft function. Recipient details, type of transplant, indication for transplant, and time on waiting list were analyzed. Recipients were stratified based on allograft ischemia time (AIT): 0 to 6, 6 to 8, 8 to 10, and >10 hours. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 30.9 years (36.7% male); 49.8% were cytomegalovirus (CMV) positive. Donor CoD was characterized by a slow rise in intracranial pressure (ICP) in 34.4%, rapid ICP in 18.7%, an intermediate ICP in 44.3%, and with no rise in 2.6%. A graft survival benefit was seen with female donors (P = .048); 34.4% of recipients ultimately developed graft failure at long term follow-up. Mean recipient age was 48 years; 63% were male and mean body-mass index (BMI) was 23.6; 60.2% had single lung transplantation, and mean wait list time was 323 days. Mean AIT totaled 421 minutes. Graft survival was longer with AIT of 8 to 10 hours compared to 6 to 8 hours (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Donor factor analysis implied only female donor status conferred a long-term graft survival advantage. Intracranial pressure rise differences appear clinically unimportant. Prolonged cold ischemic time (>10 hours) or low recipient BMI did not adversely affect allograft function in our review.     

Donor history of asthma is not a contraindication to lung transplantation: 12-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Donor asthma has been regarded as a contraindication to lung transplantation (LTx) because of concerns that pre-existing airway inflammation will predispose to early and late graft dysfunction. The aim of this study was to describe LTx outcomes in which lungs had been transplanted from donors with a history of asthma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken of 743 consecutive donor lung referrals to the Alfred Hospital between 1990 and September 2002. Seventy-four were noted to have a history of asthma, including 18 in whom asthma was the cause of death. Twenty-seven patients became lung donors, of whom 16 were on asthma treatment (on-treatment group) and 11 were not (no-treatment group). RESULTS: From 27 lung donors, 35 LTx procedures were performed (16 double LTx [DLTx], 19 single LTx [SLTx]). Five recipients died at <30 days (including 3 of early graft failure in the no-treatment group), and 7 died at >30 days (only 1 due to BOS). The 30-day, 1-year and 5-year survival rates in the on- and no-treatment donor groups were 90% vs 76%, 74% vs 69% and 74% vs 60%, respectively, and were not significantly different from our overall LTx survival rates. There were no significant differences in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, ICU stay or hospital stay overall, or when analyzed according to on treatment vs no treatment and SLTx vs DLTx. Only 2 procedures LTx were performed from fatal asthma donors, both of whom had subsequent graft dysfunction and died on Days 73 and 484, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lungs from carefully selected lung donors with a history of asthma may increase the donor pool with acceptable long-term outcomes. The use of fatal asthma donors remains problematic.     

Same-teams versus different-teams for long distance lung procurement: A cost analysis

ObjectiveIn an era of broader lung sharing, different-team transplantation (DT, procuring team from nonrecipient center) may streamline procurement logistics; however, safety and cost implications of DT remain unclear. To understand whether DT represents a safe means to reduce lung transplant (LTx) costs, we compared posttransplant outcomes and lung procurement and index hospitalization costs among matched DT and same-team transplantation (ST, procuring team from recipient center) cohorts at a single, high-volume institution. We hypothesized that DT reduces costs without compromising outcomes after LTx.MethodsPatients who underwent DT between January 2016 to May 2020 were included. A cohort of patients who underwent ST was matched 1:3 (nearest neighbor) based on recipient age, disease group, lung allocation score, history of previous LTx, and bilateral versus single LTx. Posttransplant outcomes and costs were compared between groups.ResultsIn total, 23 DT and 69 matched ST recipients were included. Perioperative outcomes and posttransplant survival were similar between groups. Compared with ST, DT was associated with similar lung procurement and index hospitalization costs (DT vs ST, procurement: median $65,991 vs $58,847, P = .16; index hospitalization: median $294,346 vs $322,189, P = .7). On average, procurement costs increased $3263 less per 100 nautical miles for DT versus ST; DT offered cost-savings when travel distances exceeded approximately 363 nautical miles.ConclusionsAt our institution, DT and ST were associated with similar post-LTx outcomes; DT offered cost-savings with increasing procurement travel distance. These findings suggest that DT may mitigate logistical and financial burdens of lung procurement; however, further investigation in a multi-institutional cohort is warranted.     

Lung Transplantation in Patients With Prior Cardiothoracic Surgical Procedures

The full spectrum of prior cardiothoracic procedures in lung transplant candidates and the impact of prior procedures on outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx) remain unknown, though the impact is considered to be large. Patients transplanted at our institution from 2004 to 2009 were identified (n = 554) and divided into two groups: patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgical (CTS) procedures prior to LTx (n = 238) and patients who had not (non‐CTS: n = 316). Our primary endpoint was survival. Secondary endpoints included allograft function and the incidence of major complications including reexploration due to bleeding, prolonged ventilation, renal insufficiency and primary graft dysfunction. Long‐term survival was not significantly different between the groups whereas postoperative bleeding, nerve injury, respiratory and renal complications were higher in the CTS group. Posttransplant peak FEV1 was lower in the CTS group (73.4% vs. 86.9%, p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, performance of a chemical pleurodesis procedure and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly associated with mortality (OR, 1.7; CI, 1.5–2.0; p < 0.005). Our results suggest that patients with LTx and prior CTS remain technically challenging and experience worse outcomes than patients without prior CTS. A surgical strategy to minimize cardiopulmonary bypass time is critical for these challenging LTx patients.     

Acute kidney injury influences mortality in lung transplantation

Objective: To evaluate the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term survival in lung transplant patients. Methods: Clinical data of 88 patients who underwent lung transplantation (LTx) were retrospectively analyzed at our institution from September 2002 to December 2011. Postoperative AKI was defined and divided into three groups based on creatinine criteria from the Acute Kidney Injury Net (AKIN) classification. A multivariable logistic regression model evaluated risk factors for AKI. Primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Risk adjusted multivariable COX proportional hazards regression examined the association of AKI with mortality. Results: A total of 47 (53.40%) patients developed AKI (27 with AKIN1, 20 with AKIN2-3) in the first week after LTx. Multivariate analysis showed pre-LT (pre-lung transplant) hypertension (OR 1.37 [0.06–2.68], p?=?0.041) and mechanical ventilation (OR 0.05 [0.01–0.09], p?=?0.022) were risk factors for postoperative AKI. Five-year survival rates in the non-AKI, AKIN1, and AKIN2-3 groups were 48.8%, 37.0%, 30.0%, respectively (p?=?0.041). Adjusted for age, sex, type and cause of LT, hypertension and diabetes, the hazard ratio for death was 1.481 ([1.040–2.107]) for AKI. Conclusions: The occurrence of AKI after LTx is common. Severe AKI would increase long-term mortality risk. Several variables, including pre-LT hypertension and mechanical ventilation, are associated with AKI after LTx.     

Determinants of survival in lung transplantation patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study

Survival after lung transplantation (LTx) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is worse compared to other indications for LTx. We investigated the effect of several pretransplant variables including the use of pretransplant corticosteroids (CS) on post‐transplant graft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)‐free survival and functional testing (maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, six‐minute walk test, quadriceps and hand pinch force) in a small cohort of IPF patients. We retrospectively compared two groups of IPF patients (n = 36 on CS vs. n = 18 not on CS) who underwent LTx between 2000 and 2016. Analysis of 54 IPF‐LTx patients showed no significant effect on graft survival or functional tests except for maximum inspiratory pressure (P = 0.033) between these two groups (all LTx patients, CS vs. no CS). Regression analysis showed significant impact of procedure with a hazard ratio of 0.423 (CI 95% 0.194, 0.924) favoring sequential single LTx (SSLTx) compared to single lung transplantation (SLTx). When analyzing only the 40 SSLTx patients, corticosteroid‐free patients showed significantly better graft survival compared to patients on CS (P = 0.045) and CLAD‐free survival (P = 0.019). The possible detrimental effect of corticosteroid therapy before LTx was demonstrated in this cohort of SSLTx patients, which questions the use of corticosteroids in a pretransplantation setting.     

Long‐Term Persistence of Donor Alveolar Macrophages in Human Lung Transplant Recipients That Influences Donor‐Specific Immune Responses

Steady‐state alveolar macrophages (AMs) are long‐lived lung‐resident macrophages with sentinel function. Evidence suggests that AM precursors originate during embryogenesis and populate lungs without replenishment by circulating leukocytes. However, their presence and persistence are unclear following human lung transplantation (LTx). Our goal was to examine donor AM longevity and evaluate whether AMs of recipient origin seed the transplanted lungs. Origin of AMs was accessed using donor–recipient HLA mismatches. We demonstrate that 94–100% of AMs present in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were donor derived and, importantly, AMs of recipient origin were not detected. Further, analysis of BAL cells up to 3.5 years post‐LTx revealed that the majority of AMs (>87%) was donor derived. Elicitation of de novo donor‐specific antibody (DSA) is a major post‐LTx complication and a risk factor for development of chronic rejection. The donor AMs responded to anti‐HLA framework antibody (Ab) with secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Further, in an experimental murine model, we demonstrate that adoptive transfer of allogeneic AMs stimulated humoral and cellular immune responses to alloantigen and lung‐associated self‐antigens and led to bronchiolar obstruction. Therefore, donor‐derived AMs play an essential role in the DSA‐induced inflammatory cascade leading to obliterative airway disease of the transplanted lungs.     

Deceased-donor lobar lung transplant: A successful strategy for small-sized recipients

ObjectivesLobar lung transplantation (LLTx) from deceased donors is a potential solution for donor–recipient size mismatch for small sized recipients. We reviewed our institutional experience to compare outcomes after LLTx to standard lung transplantation (LTx).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed transplants in our institution from January 2000 to December 2017. LLTx early- and long-term outcomes were compared with LTx. Additional analysis of outcomes was performed after dividing the cohort into 2 eras (era 1, 2000-2012; era 2, 2013-2017).ResultsAmong the entire cohort (1665), 75 were LLTx (4.5%). Compared with LTx, LLTx were more frequently bridged to transplant with extracorporeal life support or mechanical ventilation and were transplanted in a rapidly deteriorating status (respectively, 20% vs 4.4%, P = .001; 22.7% vs 7.9, P < .001; and 41.3% vs 26.5%, P = .013). LLTx had longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (respectively, median 17 vs 4 days, and 45 vs 23, both P < .001), and greater 30-day mortality (13.3% vs 4.3%, P = .001) and 90-day mortality (17.3% vs 7.2%, P = .003). In era 2, despite a significantly greater 30-day mortality (10.8% vs 2.8%, P = .026), there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between LLTx and LTx (13.5% vs 5.1%, P = .070). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was not significantly different between LLTx and LTx (73.2% vs 84.4%, 56.9% vs 68.4% and 50.4% vs 55.8, P = .088).ConclusionsAlthough LLTx is a high-risk procedure, both mid- and long-term survival are comparable with LTx in all cohorts in the modern era. LLTx therefore represents a valuable surgical option for small-sized recipients.     

Risk factors for airway complications within the first year after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation (LTx) has enjoyed increasing success with better survival in recent years. Nevertheless, airway anastomotic complications (AC) are still a potential cause of early morbidity and mortality. In this retrospective cohort study we looked at possible predictors of AC within the first year after LTx. METHODS: Between July 1991 and December 2004, 232 consecutive single (n=102) and bilateral (n=130) LTx were performed (142 males and 90 females; mean age: 48 years [range 15-66 years]). Indications for LTx were emphysema (n=113), pulmonary fibrosis (n=45), cystic fibrosis (n=35), pulmonary hypertension (n=10), sarcoidosis (n=7) and miscellaneous (n=22). Donor variables (age, gender, PaO(2)/FiO(2), mechanical ventilation, ischemic time and preservation solution) and recipient variables (age, diagnosis, length, gender, pre-operative steroids, smoking, cytomegalovirus matching, LTx type, anastomotic type, wrapping and bypass) were evaluated in an univariate and multivariate model. RESULTS: Fifty-seven complications occurred in 362 airway anastomoses (15.7%) of which 55 (15.2%) within the first year after transplantation. Six patients died as a result of AC (mortality 2.6%) during the first year after LTx. In a univariate analysis (321 airway anastomoses at risk), anastomotic type (7/17 [Telescoping] vs 48/304 [End-to-end]; p=0.011), recipient length (p=0.0012), donor ventilation (>50-70h<; p=0.0015) and recipient male gender (43/191 [M] vs 12/130 [F]; p=0.0092) were significant predictors of AC. Three factors remained significant predictors in the multivariate analysis: telescoping technique (p=0.0495), recipient length (p=0.0029) and donor ventilation (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Tall recipients and those receiving lungs from donors with prolonged ventilation have an increased risk to develop bronchial anastomotic problems. An end-to-end anastomosis should be preferred. Airway complications remain a matter of concern after lung transplantation.     

Early Lung Transplantation Success Utilizing Controlled Donation After Cardiac Death Donors

Donation-after cardiac death (DCD) donor organs have potential to significantly alleviate the shortage of transplantable lungs. However, only limited data so far describes DCD lung transplantation (LTx) techniques and results. This study aims to describe the Alfred Hospital's early and intermediate outcomes following DCD donor LTx. Following careful experimentation and consultation DCD guidelines were created to utilize Maastricht category III lung donors from either the ICU or operating room(OR), with a warm ischemic time(WIT) of <60 min. Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 referred DCD donors led to 11 attempted retrievals after withdrawal, resulting in 8 actual bilateral LTx (2 donors did not arrest in prescribed period and 1 donor had nonacceptable lungs). ICU WIT = 38.4 min (range 20–54, OR WIT = 12.7 min (11–15), p < 0.05. Post-LTx, 1 pulmonary hypertensive patient required ECMO for PGD3. The mean group pO2/FiO2 ratio at 24 hours was 307.7 (240–507) with an ICU stay of 9.5 days (2–21) and ward stay of 21.5 days (11–76). All 8 survive at a mean of 311 days (10–573) with good performance status and lung function. In conclusion, the use of Maastricht category III lungs for human LTx is associated with acceptable early clinical outcomes.     

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for lung transplant recipients with primary severe donor lung dysfunction

Primary severe donor lung dysfunction (DLD) is a significant complication after lung transplantation (LTx), and a high mortality is reported with conventional therapy. The purpose of this report is to review the experience of the University of Pittsburgh with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for primary severe DLD after LTx. From September 1991 to May 1995, 220 LTx were performed at our center. Eight patients (8/220=3.6%) with severe DLD after LTx required ECMO support. The age of LTx recipients was 44±5 years (mean±SD); seven patients were female and one was male. Indications for LTx were: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in four patients, bronchiectasis in two, and pulmonary hypertension in two. There were three single LTx and five bilateral LTx. The interval from LTx to institution of ECMO was 5.6±3.2 h (range 0–10 h). Three patients were supported with veno-venous (v-v) ECMO and five had veno-arterial (v-a) ECMO. The duration of ECMO support was 7.3±4.8 days (range 3–15 days). activated glotting time (ACT) was maintained between 110 and 180 s with intermittent use of heparin. Seven patients (7/8=87%) were successfully weaned from ECMO and six patients (6/8=75%) were discharged home; they are currently alive after a follow-up of 17±10.1 months. One patient died on ECMO support for refractory DLD and another died 2 months after ECMO wean from multisystem organ failure. At 6 months follow-up, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is 2.35±0.91 (75%±17.4% predicted) and mean forced vital capacity (FVC) is 2.53±0.81 (64%±14% predicted). We conclude that ECMO can be lifesaving when instituted early after primary severe DLD. The v-v ECMO support is preferred when the patient is hemodynamically stable and adequate long-term function of the allograft is anticipated.     

Lung transplantation from donors outside standard acceptability criteria – are they really marginal?

Lung transplantation (LTx) from “extended donor criteria” donors may reduce significantly organ shortage. However, its influence on results remains unclear. In this study, we evaluate retrospectively the results of LTx from donors outside standard criteria: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg, age over 55 years, and history of smoking > 20 pack‐years. Two hundred and forty‐eight patients underwent first time LTx in our institution between January 2007 and January 2013. Seventy‐nine patients (Group I) received organs from “extended donor criteria” and 169 patients (Group II) from “standard donor criteria.” Recipients' and donors' demographics, perioperative variables, and outcome were compared. Donors from Group I were significantly older [median (interquartile range)]: 52.5 (44;58) vs. 42 (28.5;48.5) years (P < 0.001) with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 366 ± 116.1 455 ± 80.5 mmHg (P < 0.001), higher incidence of smoking history: 57.7% vs. 41.8% (P = 0.013), and more extensive smoking history: 24(15;30) vs. 10(3.75;14) pack‐years (P < 0.001). Other parameters were comparable. Recipients' gender, diagnosis, percentage of patients operated on pump and receiving double LTx were also comparable. Recipients from Group I were significantly older: 50 (42;57) vs. 44 (29.5;53.5) years (P = 001). There were no differences observed in recipients' prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 over first three postoperative days, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, prevalence of rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). 90‐day, 1‐year, and 5‐year survival (Group I vs. II) were also similar: 88.6% vs. 91.7%, 83.2% vs. 84.6%, and 59% vs. 68.2% (log rank P = 0.367). Carefully selected donor lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand existing donor pool with no detrimental effect on LTx outcome.     

Expanding the horizons: Uncontrolled donors after circulatory death for lung transplantation—First comparison with brain death donors

Uncontrolled donation after cardiac death is an appealing source of organs for lung transplantation. We compare early and long‐term outcomes of lung transplantation with these donors with a cohort of transplants from brain death donors at our institution. Retrospective analysis of all lung transplantations was performed from 2002 to 2012. We collected variables regarding recipients, donors, recover and transplant procedures, early and late complications, and survival. We included 292 lung transplants from brain death donors and 38 from uncontrolled donors after cardiac death. Both groups were comparable except for sex mismatch (male recipient‐female donor was more frequent in the brain death cohort, 17.8% vs 0%, P 0.002), total ischemic time (longer for donors after cardiac death, 657 minutes for the first lung and 822 minutes for the second vs 309 and 425 minutes, P < 0.001), and ex vivo evaluation (more frequent in cardiac death donors, 21.1% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001). Early and late outcomes were not different (ICU stay [9 vs 10.5 days], hospital stay [33.5 vs 35 days], primary graft dysfunction G3 [24 vs 34.2%], and chronic graft dysfunction HR 1.19 [0.61‐2.32]), but overall survival was significantly lower for patients transplanted from cardiac death donors [HR 1.67 (1.06‐2.64)]. Lung transplantation after uncontrolled cardiac death offers poorer results in terms of survival compared to brain death donation. Refinement of current strategies for graft preservation and evaluation is essential to improve outcomes with this source of grafts.     

Heterotopic lung transplant: a feasible approach to compensate for organ shortages

Lung transplants are still limited by the shortage of suitable donor lungs, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. A heterotopic lung transplant (HLTx), as a flexible surgical procedure, can maximize the potential of donor lungs in an emergency, but its widespread use is hindered by difficulties in anastomosis and paucity of outcome data. We performed a retrospective review of 4 patients, each of whom received an HLTxs over 1 year, including 1 left-to-right single HLTx, 2 right-to-left single HLTxs and 1 lobar HLTx (right upper lobe-to-left). The median recipient age was 58.5 years (46–68); 3 patients were male. The postoperative hospital stay was 33 days (30–42). One recipient lived for 10 years and died of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; the others were alive with no major morbidity at 12 to 31 months after the operation with a 1-year survival of 100%. The follow-up chest images showed that transplanted lungs could be inflated well and adapted morphologically to fill the thoracic cavity in the short and long term. This study demonstrates that an HLTx is a feasible alternative to a conventional lung transplant in emergency cases and could be considered in selected patients at advanced medical centres.     

Dual kidney transplantation after liver transplantation: a good option to rescue a patient from dialysis

Abstract:  Chronic renal failure (CRF) due to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is one of the most serious side effects influencing mortality and morbidity after liver transplantation (LTx). One way to offer a longer survival and better quality of life to LTx recipients who develop CRF is kidney transplantation, though this is not feasible for all candidates due to the shortage of organs. With changes in the characteristics of the global donor pool, which includes increasing number of elderly donors, both kidneys from one older donor are transplanted into the same adult recipient (dual kidney transplantation, DKT) to offset the lower nephron mass. DKT might be an option after LTx to rescue a patient from dialysis, with consequent survival benefits. We report on two cases of DKT after LTx in patients with CRF who were on dialysis due to CNI nephrotoxicity.