Do pre-hospital trauma alert criteria predict the severity of injury and a need for an emergent surgical intervention?

ObjectiveEfficient triage may have a major influence on mortality and morbidity as well as financial consequences. A continuous effort to improve this decision making process and update the trauma alert criteria is being made. However, criteria for determining the evacuation priority are not well developed. We performed a prospective study to evaluate which pre-hospital parameters identify major trauma victims with an emphasis on a need for emergent surgical procedures.MethodsA prospective cohort included 601 patients admitted to a level one trauma centre over a three months period. The pre-hospital trauma alert criteria were recorded and set as independent variables. All major surgical procedures were graded in real time as: emergent, urgent, or not urgent. The ISS was calculated after completion of all the diagnostic workup. Patients were classified as major trauma victims if their calculated ISS was 16 or greater, and those needed an urgent intervention or intensive care. The relative risks (RR) for major trauma and a need for an emergent operation were calculated.Results243 (40%) patients were classified as having a major trauma. 39 (6.5%) patients required an emergent operative intervention: 24 for an active bleeding, 5 for a pericardial tamponade and 10 for an imminent cerebral herniation. Paramedic judgement and a penetrating injury to the trunk were the most common causes for over triage. However, a penetrating injury to the trunk had been the only clue that the victim needed an emergent operation in five cases. 128 patients had a pre-hospital Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤12. Altered mental status was the most common and a significant predictor of both major trauma (RR of 3.00 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.98–4.53) and a need for an emergent operation (RR, 95% CI: 4.43, 2.28–8.58). Also, a systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg was highly associated with an emergent operation (RR, 95% CI: 11.69, 5.85–23.36).ConclusionFor determining the evacuation priority, we suggest a triage system based on three major criteria: mental status, hypotension and a penetrating injury to the trunk. Overall, the set of trauma alert criteria system can be further simplified and enable better utilisation of resources.     

Is there a need for a clinical decision rule in blunt wrist trauma?

Background

Blunt wrist trauma is a very common injury in emergency medicine. However, in contrast to other extremity trauma, there is no clinical decision rule for radiography in patients with blunt wrist trauma.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to describe current practice and to assess the need and feasibility for a clinical decision rule for radiography in patients with blunt wrist trauma.

Methods

All patients with blunt wrist trauma who presented to our Emergency Department (ED) during a 6-month period were included in this study. Basic demographics were analysed and the radiography ratio was determined. The radiography results were compared for different demographic groups. Current practice and the need and feasibility for a decision rule were evaluated using Stiell's checklist for clinical decision rules.

Results

A total of 1019 patients with 1032 blunt wrist injuries presented at our ED in a period of 6 months. In 91.4% of patients, radiographs were taken. In 41.6% of those radiographed, a fracture was visible on plain radiography. Fractures were most common in the paediatric and senior age groups. However, even in the lower-risk groups we observed a fracture incidence of about 20%.

Conclusion

There is no need for a clinical decision rule for radiography in patients with blunt wrist trauma because the fracture ratio is high. Neither does it seem feasible to develop a highly sensitive and efficient decision rule. Therefore, the authors recommend radiography in all patients with blunt wrist trauma presenting to the ED.     

Opioid prescribing practices in a pediatric burn tertiary care facility: Is it time to change?

Opioids are the mainstay therapy in burned adults. Little data in the pediatric burn population exists that elucidates opioid prescribing practices. The primary purpose of this report is to quantify opioid and non-opioid analgesic use in pediatric burn patients admitted to a tertiary referral burn center. A retrospective audit of hospital charts and discharge records for patients <18 years old from March 2016 to March 2017 was performed. Opioid amounts were converted to either oral morphine miligram equivalents (MME) or oral MME per day and subsequently adjusted for age in kilograms (kg). Of the 226 patients, 223 (98.7%) were administered an opioid during admission. The median total opioid amount administered during admission was 0.4 (IQR: 0.3–0.6) mg oral MME per kilogram per day. Anecdotally, doses above 1 mg/kg/day are considered high risk for opioid tolerance. The median total opioid amount prescribed upon discharge was high at 3.9 (IQR: 2.3, 5.6) mg of oral MME per kilogram. Hydrocodone (96.0%) was the most common opioid administered, followed by morphine (88.1%). The most commonly prescribed discharge opioid was hydrocodone (95.4%). Non-opoioid analgesia during admission was used in 112 patients (49.6%). This study provides novel insight into the opioid practices at a tertiary burn center for pediatric patients, with our analysis showcasing high usage of opioids during admission and discharge for burn analgesia. It emphasizes the need to expand beyond opioids for burn analgesia and the importance of promoting non-opioid, multimodal analgesia in the pediatric burn population.     

Is computed tomography necessary to determine liver injury in pediatric trauma patients with negative ultrasonography?

Purpose

Abdominal trauma is the third most common cause of all trauma-related deaths in children. Liver injury is the second most common, but the most fatal injury associated with abdomen trauma. Because the liver enzymes have high sensitivity and specificity, the use of tomography has been discussed for accurate diagnosis of liver injury.

Methods

Our study was based on retrospective analyses of hemodynamically stabil patients under the age of 18 who were admitted to the emergency department with blunt abdominal trauma.

Results

Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were significantly higher as a result of liver injury. In the patients whose AST and ALT levels were lower than 40 IU/L, no liver injury was observed in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). No liver injury was detected in the patients with AST levels lower than 100 IU/L. Liver injury was detected with contrast-enhanced CT in only one patient whose ALT level was lower than 100 IU/L, but ultrasonography initially detected liver injury in this patient.

Conclusions

According to our findings, abdominal CT may not be necessary to detect liver injury if the patient has ALT and AST levels below 100 IU/L with a negative abdominal USG at admission and during follow-up.     

Is expertise in pediatric surgery necessary to perform laparoscopic splenectomy in children? An experience from a department of general surgery

Splenectomy is frequently required in children for various hematologic pathologic findings. Because of progress in minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become feasible. The objective of this report is to present a monocentric experience and to evaluate the efficacy of and complications observed after laparoscopic splenic procedures in a department of general surgery. 57 consecutive LSs have been performed in a pediatric population between January 2000 and October 2010. There were 33 females and 24 males with a median age of 12?years (range 4-17). Indications were: hereditary spherocytosis 38 cases, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura 10, sickle cell disease (SCD) 6, thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura 2 and non-hodgkin lymphoma 1 case. Patients were operated on using right semilateral position, employing Atlas Ligasure vessel sealing system in 49 cases (86%) and Harmonic Scalpel?+?EndoGIA in 8. In 24 patients (42.1%), a cholecystectomy was associated. Two patients required conversion to open splenectomy (3.5%). In three cases, a minilaparotomy was performed for spleen removal (5.2%). Accessory spleens were identified in three patients (5.2%). Complications (8.8%) included bleeding (two), abdominal collection (one) and pleural effusion (two). There was no mortality. Average operative time was 128?min (range 80-220). Average length of stay was 3?days (range 2-7). Mean blood loss was 80?ml (range 30-500) with a transfusion rate of 1.7% (one patient). Laparoscopic spleen surgery is safe, reliable and effective in the pediatric population with hematologic disorders and is associated with minimal morbidity, zero mortality, and a short length of stay. Ligasure vessel sealing system shortened operative time and blood loss. On the basis of the results, we consider laparoscopic approach the gold standard for the treatment of these patients even in a department of general surgery.     

Volumetrics and fit assessments for donor to recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: Is it time for a new paradigm?

Pediatric heart transplant patients face the highest waitlist mortality in solid organ transplantation. Given the relatively fixed number of donor organs becoming available each year, improving donor organ utilization could potentially have significant impact on reducing waitlist mortality. Donor to recipient weight ratio has historically been used to identify suitable donors; however, this method does not take into account the potential for significant variance in heart size due to complex congenital heart disease or underlying cardiomyopathy. We believe, based on our experience to date, that donor matching based upon weight ratios should be augmented by improved methodologies that provide a more accurate assessment of heart volumes. Herein we describe the rationale for these methodologies and our single-center experience using volumetrics as an alternative for donor fit assessments.     

Is it time for a new TNM classification in esophageal carcinoma?

PURPOSE: To investigate the importance of lymph node yield (LNY) and the ratio of afflicted lymph nodes in esophageal carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2004, 368 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent surgery. Esophagectomy with curative intent was performed in 255 patients. Subtotal esophagectomy was performed either by thoracoabdominal (104 patients, 40.8%) or by transhiatal approach (151 patients, 59.2%). RESULTS: According to the LNY, patients were grouped into 3 groups. Twenty-six patients had < or =5, 96 had 6 to 18, and 113 had > or =19 dissected lymph nodes. In patients with nodal involvement (pN1), no significant overall survival differences were identified when stratifying subgroups according to the LNY. However, LNY had striking prognostic relevance in pN0 patients. The median overall survival was 23 (< or =5 LN), 36 (6-18 LN), and 88 months (> or =19). Even for patients with tripled LNY than the proposed minimum by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (18 LN), the rate of patients with detected lymph node metastases was only 46%, compared with 61% for patients with a LNY of > or =19 (P = 0.002). In pN1 patients classified according to the ratio of afflicted lymph nodes, median overall survival was 27 months in patients with a ratio <11%, compared with 15 and 13 months in patients with a ratio of 11% to 33% and >33%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression modeling identified ratio as the strongest independent prognostic factor for overall survival in pN1 and the LNY in pN0 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal regional LNY of 6 lymph nodes as recommended by the UICC for esophageal carcinoma is far too low to appropriately stage the disease. The LNY and the ratio should be reflected in the next version of the UICC classification.     

Is arterial proximity a valid indication for arteriography in penetrating extremity trauma? A prospective analysis

Three hundred seventy-three patients with a penetrating extremity injury were studied to assess the yield of arteriography. Patients underwent arteriography if any of the following was present: bruit, history of hemorrhage or hypotension, fracture, hematoma, decreased capillary refill, major soft-tissue injury, or nerve or pulse deficit. In the absence of these findings, arteriography was performed if the injury was in "proximity" to a major neurovascular bundle. In 216 patients, arteriography was performed when an abnormal finding was noted. Sixty-five injuries were identified, 19 requiring intervention. Proximity was the indication for arteriography in 157 patients. Seventeen injuries were identified, of which one required repair. In penetrating extremity trauma, the need for arteriography is based on clinical findings. The use of arteriography to screen for an arterial injury when proximity alone is the indication rarely identifies a significant injury and should be abandoned.