Genotypic study documents divergence in the pathogenesis of bloodstream infection related central venous catheters in neonates

ObjectiveTo investigate the pathogenesis of bloodstream infection by Staphylococcus epidermidis, using the molecular epidemiology, in high-risk neonates.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of a cohort of neonates with bloodstream infection using central venous catheters for more than 24 h. “National Healthcare Safety Network” surveillance was conducted. Genotyping was performed by DNA fingerprinting and mecA genes and icaAD were detected by multiplex-PCR.ResultsFrom April 2006 to April 2008, the incidence of bloodstream infection and central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection was 15.1 and 13.0/1000 catheter days, respectively, with S. epidermidis accounting for 42.9% of episodes. Molecular analysis was used to document the similarity among six isolates of bloodstream infection by S. epidermidis from cases with positive blood and central venous catheter tip cultures. Fifty percent of neonates had bloodstream infection not identified as definite or probable central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection. Only one case was considered as definite central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and was extraluminally acquired; the remaining were considered probable central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections, with one probable extraluminally and another probable intraluminally acquired bloodstream infection. Additionally, among mecA+ and icaAD+ samples, one clone (A) was predominant (80%). A polyclonal profile was found among sensitive samples that were not carriers of the icaAD gene.ConclusionsThe majority of infections caused by S. epidermidis in neonates had an unknown origin, although 33.3% appeared to have been acquired intraluminally and extraluminally. We observed a polyclonal profile between sensitive samples and a prevalent clone (A) between resistant samples.     

Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

PURPOSE: To review the literature on prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles. Primary authors were contacted directly if data were incomplete. STUDY SELECTION: Studies met the following criteria unless otherwise stated: Trials were prospective and randomized; catheters were inserted into new sites, not into old sites over guidewires; catheter cultures were done by using semi-quantitative or quantitative methods; and, for prospective studies, catheter-related bloodstream infection was confirmed by microbial growth from percutaneously drawn blood cultures that matched catheter cultures. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on population, methods, preventive strategy, and outcome (measured as catheter-related bloodstream infections) were gathered. The quality of the data was graded by using preestablished criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are full barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; subcutaneous tunneling short-term catheters inserted in the internal jugular or femoral veins when catheters are not used for drawing blood; contamination shields for pulmonary artery catheters; povidone-iodine ointment applied to insertion sites of hemodialysis catheters; specialized nursing teams caring for patients with short-term peripheral venous catheters, especially at institutions with a high incidence of catheter-related infection; no routine replacement of central venous catheters; antiseptic chamberfilled hub or hub-protective antiseptic sponge for central venous catheters; and use of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated or minocycline-rifampin-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies that do not incorporate antimicrobial agents (for example, maximal barrier precautions). CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed.     

Risk of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis

Background and objectives

Elderly patients require tunneled central vein dialysis catheters more often than younger patients. Little is known about the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in this population.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This study identified 464 patients on hemodialysis with tunneled central vein dialysis catheters between 2005 and 2007 and excluded patients who accrued <21 catheter-days during this period. Outpatient and inpatient catheter-related bloodstream infection data were collected. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for sex, ancestry, comorbidites, dialysis vintage, dialysis unit, immunosuppression, initial catheter site, and first antimicrobial catheter lock solution was performed for risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection between nonelderly (18–74 years) and elderly (≥75 years) patients.

Results

In total, 374 nonelderly and 90 elderly patients with mean (SD) ages of 54.8 (12.3) and 81.3 (4.9) years and dialysis vintages of 1.8 (3.3) and 1.5 (2.9) years (P=0.47), respectively, were identified. Mean at-risk catheter-days were 272 (243) in nonelderly and 318 (240) in elderly patients. Between age groups, there were no significant differences in initial catheter site, type of catheter lock solution, or microbiology results. A total of 208 catheter-related bloodstream infection events occurred (190 events in nonelderly and 18 events in elderly patients), with a catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence per 1000 catheter-days of 1.97 (4.6) in nonelderly and 0.55 (1.6) in elderly patients (P<0.001). Relative to nonelderly patients, the hazard ratio for catheter-related bloodstream infection in the elderly was 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.55; P<0.001) after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Elderly patients on hemodialysis using tunneled central vein dialysis catheters are at lower risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection than their younger counterparts. For some elderly patients, tunneled central vein dialysis catheters may represent a suitable dialysis access option in the setting of nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae or poorly functioning synthetic grafts.     

Preventing catheter-associated infections in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: impact of an educational program surveying policies for insertion and care of central venous catheters in a Brazilian teaching hospital

ObjectivesTo determine the impact of an educational program on the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections in a Brazilian Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Patients and MethodsAll patients admitted to the unit between February 2004 and May 2005 were included in the cohort study in a longitudinal assessment. An educational program was developed based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for prevention of catheter-associated infections and was adapted to local conditions and resources after an initial observational phase. Incidence of catheter-associated infections was measured by means of on-site surveillance.ResultsOne hundred eighteen nosocomial infections occurred in 253 patients (46.6 infections per 100 admissions) and in 2,954 patient-days (39.9 infections per 1,000 patient-days). The incidence-density of catheter infections was 31.1 episodes per 1.000 venous central catheter-days before interventions, and 16.5 episodes per 1,000 venous central catheter-days afterwards (relative risk 0.53 [95% CI 0.28–1.01]). Corresponding rates for exit-site catheter infections were 8.0 and 2.5 episodes per 1,000 venous central catheter-days [0.32 (0.07–1.49)], and the rates for bloodstream infections were 23.1 and 13.9 episodes per 1,000 venous central catheter-days, before and after interventions [0.61 (0.32–1.14)].ConclusionA prevention strategy targeted at the insertion and maintenance of vascular access can decrease rates of vascular-access infections in pediatric intensive care unit.     

重症监护室老年患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素

目的探讨重症监护室（ICU）老年患者导管相关血流感染（CRBSI）的危险因素。方法ICU90例老年住院患者接受中心静脉置管,分为导管相关性血流感染（CRBSI）组和无感染（对照）组。CRBSI组患者为ICU住院的行深静脉置管伴CRBSI的病例（n=45）,而对照组为同期ICU住院的行深静脉置管但无CRBSI的病例（17=45）,采用回顾性和病例对照的研究方法,对两组患者进行风险困素分析。结果两组患者基础疾病构成、年龄、性别、感染前导管留鼍时间、机械通气、完全肠外营养、尿管留置等的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。与对照组比较,CRBSI组使用碳青霉烯类抗生素、操作熟练程度、置管部位、低白蛋白血症、贫血、APACHEII评分差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01、P〈0．05）。使用碳青霉烯类抗生素、操作者、低A蛋白血症、APACHEII评分是CRBSI独立危险因素。结论碳青霉烯类抗生素使用、操作者人员熟练程度、低白蛋A血症及APACHEII评分是ICU老年患者CRBSI的独立危险因素。     

Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients using a disinfectable, needle-free connector: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a disinfectable, needle-free connector in the prophylaxis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed in a polyvalent intensive care unit. Patients who needed multilumen central venous catheters were randomly assigned to a study or a control group. All catheters were inserted and manipulated according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Study group patients were equipped with catheters with disinfectable, needle-free connectors whereas control group patients were equipped with catheters with 3-way stopcocks. Two peripheral blood cultures and a semiquantitative culture of the catheter tip were performed on removal of the catheter. RESULTS: The study included 243 patients, with a total of 278 central venous catheters. The catheters' mean insertion duration was 9.9 days. Both groups were comparable regarding patient and catheter characteristics. Incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.7 per 1000 days of catheter use in the study group, compared with 5.0 per 1000 days of catheter use in the control group (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: To add a disinfectable, needle-free connector to the CDC recommendations reduces the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients with central venous catheters.     

Chlorhexidine bathing to reduce central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection: impact and sustainability

BackgroundChlorhexidine bathing has been associated with reductions in healthcare-associated bloodstream infection. To determine the impact and sustainability of the effect of chlorhexidine bathing on central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection, we performed a prospective, 3-phase, multiple-hospital study.MethodsIn the medical intensive care unit and the respiratory care unit of a tertiary care hospital and the medical-surgical intensive care units of 4 community hospitals, rates of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection were collected prospectively for each period. Pre-intervention (phase 1) patients were bathed with soap and water or nonmedicated bathing cloths; active intervention (phase 2) patients were bathed with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cloths with the number of baths administered and skin tolerability assessed; post-intervention (phase 3) chlorhexidine bathing was continued but without oversight by research personnel. Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates were compared over study periods using Poisson regression.ResultsCompared with pre-intervention, during active intervention there were significantly fewer central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (6.4/1000 central venous catheter days vs 2.6/1000 central venous catheter days, relative risk, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.68; P < .001), and this reduction was sustained during post-intervention (2.9/1000 central venous catheter days; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.70; P < .001). During the active intervention period, compliance with chlorhexidine bathing was 82%. Few adverse events were observed.ConclusionIn this multiple-hospital study, chlorhexidine bathing was associated with significant reductions in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection, and these reductions were sustained post-intervention when chlorhexidine bathing was unmonitored. Chlorhexidine bathing was well tolerated and is a useful adjunct to reduce central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection.     

Incidence and outcome of healthcare-associated Acinetobacter baumannii in chronically ventilated patients in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan

IntroductionMost studies related to healthcare-associated infection with Acinetobacter baumannii (HAIA) are on acutely ventilated patients. Little is known regarding the incidence and outcomes of HAIA in chronically ventilated patients.MethodsA retrospective study of chronically ventilated patients covering the period May 2002 to May 2008 was conducted to determine the incidence of patients with HAIA. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate differences in the 30-day mortality between those with and those without HAIA by case-control study after controlling for confounders.ResultsOf 240 patients who were chronically ventilated for 49,207 days, 78 (32.5%) acquired HAIA at a rate of 1.59/1,000 patient day. The central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections rate was 8.78 per 1,000 catheter days; the ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was 1.26 per 1,000 ventilator days; and the catheter-associated urinary tract infections rate was 0.17 per 1,000 catheter days. Fifty (64.1%) HAIA and 58 (64.4%) non-HAIA patients were treated well and survived without ICU admission. After univariate and multivariate analyses, prolonged ventilation days (odds ratio: 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-6.1; P = 0.01] and inappropriate empiric antibiotics within 48 hours (odds ratio: 7.9; 95% confidence interval: 3.9-9.8; P = 0.02) were independent factors that predicted the 30-day mortality of HAIA among chronically ventilated patients.ConclusionsAlthough chronically ventilated patients with HAIA have longer ventilator days, higher antibiotics resistance, and high rate per 100 patients of ventilator-associated pneumonia, most patients are treated well. Compared with patients without HAIA, prolonged ventilation days and inappropriate empiric antibiotics within 48 hours are independent factors of the 30-day mortality.     

Catheter-related infections in continuous hemodiafiltration in intensive care patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Infection control is of key importance especially in the application of long-term continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) involving invasive vascular catheterization to critically ill patients. We investigated hemodialysis catheter-related infections in long-term CHDF. METHODS: We examined catheter infections in 54 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and underwent CHDF for 2 weeks or longer. RESULTS: With a total of 155 catheters (1,071 catheter days) studied, catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection were noted with an incidence rate of 4.8 and 2.7 per 1,000 catheter days, respectively. No difference in catheter colonization rate was observed depending on the catheterization sites or duration of catheterization. Infections were identified in 39 patients (72%) and blood culture positivity was noted in 25 patients (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Since the majority of cases requiring long-term CHDF are complicated with a variety of infections, it is difficult to control infections associated with hemodialysis catheters separately from infections of other types. Systemic infection control should serve as a strategy finally leading to successful control of catheter-related infection.     

Peripherally inserted central catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: A retrospective 7-years single-center study

ObjectivesWe sought to investigate the nature and incidence of bloodstream infection complications and to identify the risk factors of central catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI).MethodsDuring the study period, 291 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies who underwent PICC placement were retrospectively enrolled. We analyzed the covariates that were specified a priori for their association with CRBSI through multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The association between each predictor and the related outcome was expressed using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsOf 391 peripherally inserted central catheter (PICCs) were inserted in 291 patients for a total of 63,714 catheter days during 7 years, with an infection rate of 0.71/1,000 catheter days. Among the patients with hematological malignancies, those with acute leukemia were prone to CRBSI. Having previous bloodstream infection (BSI) (HR 18.139; 95% CI, 8.19-40.174; P < .0001), the number of PICCs insertions (HR 4.695; 95% CI, 1.842-11.967; P = .001) (twice), (HR 6.794; 95% CI, 1.909-24.181; P = .003) (≥3 times) were significantly associated with CRBSI. Not accompanied by chronic comorbidities (HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.131-0.887; P = .028) and longer duration of PICC use (days) (HR 0.997; 95% CI, 0.994-0.999; P = .008) might be protective factors preventing CRBSI.ConclusionsOur finding suggests that previous BSI and a higher number of PICC insertions are associated with an increased risk of CRBSI. A lack of chronic comorbidities may help prevent CRBSI.     

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND: Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented. OBJECTIVE: To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs.Data Sources: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.Studies Included: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiological investigations.Outcome Measures: Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection. SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e. education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.     

Difference in time to positivity is useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Catheter-related bloodstream infections are associated with recognized morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of such infections results in proper management of patients and in reducing unnecessary removal of catheters. We carried out a prospective study in a bone marrow transplant unit to assess the validity of a test based on the earlier positivity of central venous blood cultures in comparison with peripheral blood cultures for predicting catheter-related bacteremia. Between May 2002 and June 2004, 38 bloodstream infections with positive simultaneous central venous catheter and peripheral vein blood cultures were included. A total of 22 patients had catheter-related bacteremias and 16 had noncatheter-related bacteremias, using the catheter-tip culture/clinical criteria as the criterion standard to define catheter-related bacteremia. Differential time to positivity of 120 min or more was associated with 86% sensitivity and 87% specificity. In conclusion, differential time to positivity of 120 min or more is sensitive and specific for catheter-related bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients who have nontunnelled short-term catheters.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Catheter Locking Solutions to Reduce Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis Patients

Background and objectives

Infection is the second leading cause of death in hemodialysis patients. Catheter-related bloodstream infection and infection-related mortality have not improved in this population over the past two decades. This study evaluated the impact of a prophylactic antibiotic lock solution on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and mortality.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study compared the effectiveness of two catheter locking solutions (gentamicin/citrate versus heparin) in 555 hemodialysis patients dialyzing with a tunneled cuffed catheter between 2008 and 2011. The groups were not mutually exclusive. Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection and mortality hazards were compared between groups.

Results

The study population (n=555 and 1350 catheters) had a median age of 62 years (interquartile range=41–83 years), with 50% men and 71% black. There were 427 patients evaluable in the heparin period (84,326 days) and 322 patients evaluable in the antibiotic lock period (71,192 days). Catheter-related bloodstream infection in the antibiotic lock period (0.45/1000 catheter days) was 73% lower than the heparin period (1.68/1000 catheter days; P=0.001). Antibiotic lock use was associated with a decreased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection compared with heparin (risk ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.38 after multivariate adjustment). Cox proportional hazards modeling found that antibiotic lock was associated with a reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.58 in unadjusted analyses; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.75 after multivariate adjustment). The rate of gentamicin-resistant organisms decreased (0.40/1000 person-years to 0.22/1000 person-years) in the antibiotic lock period (P=0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study show that the use of a prophylactic, gentamicin/citrate lock was associated with a substantial reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infection and is the first to report a survival advantage of antibiotic lock in a population at high risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality.     

Catheter‐associated bloodstream infection incidence and outcomes in congenital cardiac surgery

Objective: Catheter‐associated bloodstream infections complicate and prolong hos‐ pitalizations. The incidence of catheter‐associated bloodstream infections in children undergoing congenital cardiac surgery has not been reported. This study sought to define the incidence of catheter‐associated bloodstream infections after congenital cardiac surgery in neonates and infants ≤12 months old and compare hospital out‐ comes and costs to those who underwent surgery and did not have a catheter‐associ‐ ated bloodstream infections.
Design: Retrospective review of hospital admissions between October 2013 and November 2015 for neonates and infants ≤12 months old at admission with ICD‐9 codes for congenital cardiac surgery from discharge data from Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager (formerly University HealthSystem Consortium), an ana‐ lytic platform for performance improvement. Hospitals were included if they had >100 congenital cardiac surgery admissions during the study period. Admissions were stratified by age at admission: Neonates (<1 month) and Infants (1‐12 months). Established database flags for catheter‐associated bloodstream infections were uti‐ lized. Length of stay, mortality, and direct costs were compared between admissions with and without catheter‐associated bloodstream infections using t test or χ², as appropriate.
Results: Catheter‐associated bloodstream infections incidence after congenital car‐ diac surgery was higher in Neonates than Infants (1.5 vs 0.8%, P = .024). Length of stay and direct costs were significantly higher for patients with catheter‐associated bloodstream infections in both groups. Mortality was higher in the Infant group with catheter‐associated bloodstream infections compared to those without catheter‐as‐ sociated bloodstream infections.
Conclusion: Neonates develop catheter‐associated bloodstream infections at nearly twice the rate of older infants. For those who develop infection, mortality is 2‐8‐fold greater and hospital costs are 4‐6‐fold higher, which further highlight the importance of catheter‐associated bloodstream infections prevention in this population.     

Clinical Infections and Bloodstream Isolates Associated with Fever in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Summary Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk for infections. The aim of this study was to identify the sources of fever and the type of pathogens that cause bloodstream infection in patients with AML undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy and antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients and Methods: The source of fever and the type of pathogens causing bloodstream infection were identified for 129 febrile episodes experienced by 42 patients with AML receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: A source of fever was identified in 81% of all febrile episodes. Mucositis (21.7%), pneumonia (13.2%), central venous catheter infection (12.4%), neutrophenic enterocolitis (9.3%) and invasive fungal disease (9.3%) were the most common sources of fever. Of 16 central venous catheter infections, seven (43.8%) were not associated with local signs. 49 febrile episodes (37.9%) were associated with bloodstream infections, of which 14 (28.6%) were polymicrobic and seven (14.3%) had an undefined source of infection. Bloodstream infection was commonly associated with cellulitis (60%), mucositis (57.1%), central venous catheter infection (55.6%), neutropenic enterocolitis (41.7%) and invasive fungal disease (41.7%). Gram-positive microorganisms were the most common blood isolates (75.8%). Gram-negative bacteremic infections occurred in eight episodes (12.1%) experienced by patients who were nor receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxes at the time of bacteremia. Noninfectious sources of fever accounted for 23 (17.8%) of the 129 febrile episodes. Conclusion: Although the spectrum of pathogens that cause infection in this group of patients has shifted from gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria, the most common sources of infection remain the same as previously described and they mainly involve integumental surfaces. Received: December 5, 1999 · Revision accepted: August 8, 2000     

临时中心静脉插管所致的血液透析并发症

目的 探讨临时中心静脉插管血液透析患者发生的导管相关并发症及其与插管时间、部位的关系.方法 将本院收入的临时插管血液透析患者753例为研究对象,分析血液透析导管相关并发症的危险因素,观察各种并发症与插管时间、部位的关系.结果 透析导管相关感染、导管功能不全、上腔静脉梗阻综合征与中心静脉插管部位、留置时间存在相关性.通过右颈内静脉置管可明显降低患者出现透析导管相关感染、上腔静脉梗阻综合征的机会,同时证明导管功能不全与置管位置无关而与置管时间有关.结论 导管留置部位、留置时间、年龄是透析导管相关感染、导管功能不全、上腔静脉梗阻综合征发生的重要危险因素.     

Antibiotic-coated hemodialysis catheters for the prevention of vascular catheter-related infections: a prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of minocycline-rifampin-coated hemodialysis catheters in reducing catheter-related infections in patients requiring hemodialysis for acute renal failure. METHODS: Between May 2000 and March 2002, 66 patients were randomly assigned to receive a minocycline-rifampin-impregnated central venous catheter and 64 were randomly assigned to receive an unimpregnated catheter. Patients were followed prospectively until the catheter was removed. Catheter-related infection was determined through quantitative catheter cultures, quantitative blood cultures, or both. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were similar in age, sex, underlying disease, type of dialysis (continuous vs. intermittent), neutropenia during catheterization and its duration, catheter insertion difficulties, and administration of blood products or medication. The mean (+/- SD) catheter dwell time was the same in both groups (8 +/- 6 days, P = 0.7). There were seven catheter-related infections (11%), all associated with the use of unimpregnated catheters. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the risk of catheter-related infection showed that coated catheters were less likely to be associated with infection (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The use of polyurethane hemodialysis catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin decreases the risk of catheter-related infection in patients with acute renal failure.     

Defining bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters in patients with cancer: a systematic review

The objective of this review was to determine whether consistent definitions were used in published studies of bloodstream infections due to central venous catheters in patients with cancer (ie, catheter-related or catheter-associated bloodstream infections). Review of 191 studies reporting catheter-related or catheter-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer revealed a lack of uniformity in these definitions. We grouped definitions by type, with 39 articles failing to cite or report a definition. Definitions included those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 39) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (n = 18). The criteria included in the definitions in studies were also tabulated. Clinical manifestations were frequently included. Definitions used have been highly variable; comparability of risk factors, incidence, management, and outcomes of such infections is difficult to achieve across studies. Future research should focus on development of a common definition of catheter-related and catheter-associated bloodstream infections for both adults and children with cancer.     

Bloodstream infections can develop late (after day 100) and/or in the absence of neutropenia in children receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence and time from transplantation of bloodstream infections occurring in children receiving bone marrow transplant (BMT) at G Gaslini Children's Hospital between September 1984 and December 1997. During this period the incidence was 35% after allogeneic and 26% after autologous BMT (P=0.08). Among these episodes, 38% after allogeneic BMT and 90% after autologous BMT were detected in the presence of neutropenia within the first 30 days from reinfusion (P < 0.001). Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections was 40% after allogeneic and 8% after autologous BMT (P < 0.001). Bloodstream infections in the absence of neutropenia were 55% after allogeneic BMT vs 10% after autologous BMT (P < 0.001) and occurred later after reinfusion (mean 199 vs 41 days, P <0.001). Among the episodes occurring after allogeneic BMT and in the absence of neutropenia, 61% were related to the presence of a central venous catheter, 15% were related to the presence of GVHD, but 23% were not associated with any of major risk factors for infection. Finally, 38% of episodes following allogeneic BMT were detected after day 100 vs 1% after autologous BMT. We concluded that patients receiving allogeneic BMT experience a high incidence of bloodstream infections in the absence of neutropenia and that a significant proportion of these episodes is not clearly associated with well known risk factors such as GVHD or central venous catheters. Moreover, many episodes develop a long time after the transplantation procedure. Therefore, any febrile episode following allogeneic BMT even late and/or in the absence of neutropenia should be intensively managed.     

Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The risk for catheter-related infection seems higher with femoral catheters than with catheters inserted at other sites. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter tunneling on femoral catheter-related infection in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Three intensive care units at academic hospitals in Paris, France. PATIENTS: 345 adult patients requiring a femoral venous catheter for more than 48 hours. INTERVENTION: Tunneled or nontunneled femoral catheters. MEASUREMENTS: Time to occurrence of systemic catheter-related sepsis, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and quantitative catheter tip culture with a cutoff of 10(3) colony-forming units/mL. RESULTS: Of 345 randomly assigned patients, 336 were evaluable. Probable systemic catheter-related sepsis occurred in 15 of 168 patients who received a nontunneled femoral catheter (controls) and in 5 of 168 patients who received a tunneled femoral catheter (estimated absolute risk reduction, 6% [95% CI, 0.9% to 11%]). Time to occurrence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was not significantly modified (relative risk, 0.28 [CI, 0.03 to 1.92]; P = 0.18); 3 events occurred in the control group and 1 event occurred in the tunneled-catheter group. After stratification by treatment center and adjustment for variables that were prognostic (use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents at catheter insertion) or imbalanced between both groups (mechanical ventilation at insertion), tunnelized catheterization reduced the proportion of patients who developed systemic catheter-related sepsis (relative risk, 0.25 [CI, 0.09 to 0.72]; P = 0.005) and positive quantitative culture of the catheter tip (relative risk, 0.48 [CI, 0.23 to 0.99]; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The incidence of femoral catheter-related infections in critically ill patients can be reduced by using subcutaneous tunneling.