Comparison of caudal block using bupivacaine and ketamine with ilioinguinal nerve block for orchidopexy in children

Forty boys weighing less than 25 kg undergoing unilateral orchidopexy were randomly allocated to receive one of two analgesic regimens. Group C received a caudal epidural block with 0.25% bupivacaine 1 mlkg⁻¹ and preservative-free ketamine 0.5 mgkg⁻¹; Group L received an ilioinguinal nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 mlkg⁻¹ and infiltration of the wound with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 mlkg⁻¹. All subjects received diclofenac sodium 1–2 mgkg⁻¹ as a rectal suppository. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a modified Objective Pain Score and analgesia was administered if this exceeded a value of 4. The median duration of analgesia was 10 h (range 2.6 to > 24 h) in Group C and 2.9 h (range 0.7 to > 24 h) in Group L (p < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the incidence of motor block, urinary retention, postoperative vomiting or postoperative sedation. Subjects in Group L required significantly more doses of postoperative analgesia than those in Group C (p < 0.05).     

Caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children

A clinical trial was performed to compare the effects of intramuscular dihydrocodeine with caudal bupivacaine on postoperative pain and recovery in 181 children who had undergone either circumcision, inguinal herniotomy or orchidopexy performed under general anaesthesia. Linear analogues were used in assess level of consciousness and apparent pain. Recovery of consciousness was slower after caudal analgesia. For 90 minutes following circumcision there was significantly less pain and caudal analgesia, but better pain relief could not be demonstrated following inguinal herniotomy and orchidopexy.     

Paediatric postoperative analgesia A comparison of rectal diclofenac with caudal bupivacaine after inguinal herniotomy

Forty-three children for day case inguinal herniotomy under general anaesthesia were assigned randomly to receive either 1 ml/kg caudal bupivacaine 0.25% or rectal diclofenac 0.25 mg/kg intra-operatively to provide postoperative analgesia. Pain and demeanour were assessed by an observer in the early postoperative period after operation and by questionnaire for the parents over the first 24 hours. Caudal bupivacaine provided more pain-free patients at first but later the incidence of pain was similar in the two treatment groups. Rectal diclofenac is a useful alternative to caudal blockade in this group of patients.     

The optimal dose of ketamine for caudal epidural blockade in children

Sixty boys aged up to 9 years undergoing orchidopexy were randomly allocated to receive one of three solutions for caudal epidural injection: group A received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with 0.25 mg. kg⁻¹of preservative-free ketamine, group B received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with ketamine 0.5mg. kg⁻¹ and group C received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg. kg⁻¹ of ketamine. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a modified Objective Pain Score and analgesia was administered if this score exceeded four. The median duration of caudal analgesia was 7.9h in group A, 11 h in group B and 16.5 h in group C. There were no differences between the groups in the incidence of motor block, urinary retention, postoperative vomiting or postoperative sedation. Group C had a significantly higher incidence of behavioural side effects, including slightly odd behaviour, vacant stares and abnormal effect than groups A and B.     

Plasma bupivacaine concentrations during caudal analgesia and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in children

Plasma bupivacaine concentrations were measured in 27 children aged 3-7 years who received one of two analgesic regimens for herniotomy or orchidopexy. Analgesia was provided either by caudal epidural bupivacaine 0.2% 2 mg/kg (n = 14) or by ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% 1.25 mg/kg (n = 13). Mean (SD) peak venous bupivacaine concentrations were 0.57 (0.17) microgram/ml and 0.79 (0.38) microgram/ml respectively. Time to peak plasma concentrations were 29.6 (7.9) and 22.3 (10.9) minutes respectively. These concentrations are well below the potentially toxic level of 4.0 micrograms/ml, but suggest that uptake of bupivacaine is more rapid after ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block than during caudal analgesia.     

Paediatric post orchidopexy analgesia—effect of diclofenac combined with ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block

Summary
When ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blockade is used to provide postoperative analgesia after paediatric orchidopexy, supplemental analgesia may be required postoperatively. Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal analgesic which produces effective analgesia after tonsillectomy. We examined the effect of combining diclofenac with inguinal field block for post orchidopexy analgesia. Following induction of anaesthesia, group 1 ( n = 25) received ilioinguinal block and rectal diclofenac (2 mg·kg⁻¹) and group 2 ( n = 25) received ilioinguinal block alone. Objective pain scores were assessed for the first three h postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative rescue analgesia, noted. Pain scores were significantly less in group 1 at 45, 60, 90 and 120 min postop ( P < 0.05). The postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly lower in the diclofenac group compared to control ( P < 0.05). A single administration of rectal diclofenac is a simple and effective method of significantly improving analgesia associated with inguinal field block, after paediatric orchidopexy.     

Paediatric postoperative analgesia

Fifty children who underwent day case herniotomy received either a caudal injection of 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% or infiltration of the wound edges at the end of surgery with 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25%, allocated at random. Postoperative pain and demeanour were assessed initially by an observer and later by use of a parental questionnaire. Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic solution provided analgesia which was comparable to that associated with caudal block, and the incidence of side effects was similar in the two groups. Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic offers a simple, safe alternative to caudal block for provision of postoperative analgesia in this group of patients.     

Caudal bupivacaine-tramadol combination for postoperative analgesia in pediatric herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND: Administration of bupivacaine caudally has been used for postoperative analgesia after urogenital, rectal and lower abdominal surgery in children. Caudal opioids may offer analgesic advantages over bupivacaine alone but have been associated with side effects such as respiratory depression. Tramadol is an analgesic assumed to lack a respiratory depressant effect and has been shown to provide effective, long-lasting analgesia after epidural administration in adults and children. The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of tramadol to bupivacaine caudally prolongs the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone, with respect to side effects, and whether caudal tramadol alone provides satisfactory analgesia. METHODS: Sixty boys, aged 12-84 months, undergoing unilateral herniorrhaphy, were allocated randomly to three groups. Children in group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine 1 ml kg(-1), group BT received an identical local anesthetic dose mixed with tramadol 1.5 mg kg(-1) and group T received caudal tramadol 1.5 mg kg(-1) in 0.9% sodium chloride in the same total volume (1 ml kg(-1)). Pain and demeanour assessments were made 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after recovery from anesthesia with reference to a three-point scale. RESULTS: Analgesia time (time between caudal injection and first administration of analgesic) in group BT (13.5+/-2.2 h) was significantly longer than in the other two groups (P<0.05). In group T, more patients required additional analgesia after surgery than in the other two groups (P<0.05). Pain scores in the three groups were similar up to 4 h after operation but the mean score in group T was higher than groups B and BT 4 and 6 h after operation (P<0.05). Significantly more patients who had received caudal bupivacaine alone or with tramadol had lower pain and demeanour scores during the first 24 h after operation compared with those in the tramadol group. CONCLUSION: Caudal administration of bupivacaine with the addition of tramadol resulted in superior analgesia with a longer period without demand for additional analgesics compared with caudal bupivacaine and tramadol alone without an increase of side effects.     

Caudal 0.2% ropivacaine is less effective during surgery than 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that without the analgesic effects of volatile anesthetics, caudal 0.20% ropivacaine would be less effective during surgical stimulation than 0.20% bupivacaine or 0.20% levobupivacaine. This trial was designed to examine whether the combination of a caudal block with 0.20% ropivacaine and i.v. anesthesia resulted in reduced analgesic efficacy during surgery compared with caudal 0.20% levobupivacaine or 0.20% bupivacaine in children. METHODS: Ninety ASA I-II children between 1 and 7 years old, scheduled for inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy under propofol anesthesia were randomized to receive a caudal block with 1 ml x kg(-1) of 0.2% bupivacaine, 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome measure of the study was the clinical efficacy of the caudal block during surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain relief and residual motor blockade. RESULTS: Four children were excluded and 86 were analyzed. The proportion of children with effective caudal block during surgery was significantly higher in children receiving levobupivacaine (26/28) or bupivacaine (27/29) compared with patients receiving ropivacaine (21/29) (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences among groups in the analgesic onset time (P = 0.1), incidence of residual motor blockade (P = 0.4), number of patients requiring analgesia after operation or in the time from caudal injection to the first administration of analgesic medication (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with propofol anesthesia, 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine are more effective than 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal use in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy.     

The effects of wound infiltration with bupivacaine versus saline on postoperative pain and opioid requirements after herniorrhaphy

In a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, twenty-eight healthy, male patients, aged 20–69 years, scheduled for unilateral elective inguinal herniorrhaphy ad modum Bassini were randomized to receive postoperative infiltration of the surgical wound with either bupivacaine 0.25%, or isotonic saline. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 3–5 mg·kg^-1 and alfentanyl 10 μg·kg^-1, and maintained with alfentanyl 5 μg·kg^-1 15 min and N₂O/O₂. After herniorrhaphy, the internal fascia was infiltrated with bupivacaine 0.25% or saline, 10 ml. After closure of the external fascia, the subcutaneous tissue was infiltrated with bupivacaine 0.25% or saline, 15 ml on both sides of the surgical wound. Pain at rest, during mobilisation and during cough was significantly decreased in patients receiving bupivacaine compared to placebo. Median time to first request for morphine was increased from 25 min to 135 min, and the consumption of supplementary morphine during the 24 h study period reduced from four to two doses of 0.1 mg·kg^-1 iv or 0.125 mg·kg^-1 im, in patients who received bupivacaine compared to placebo.     

Rectal versus intramuscular morphine-scopolamine as premedication in children

Intramuscular morphine-scopolamine for premedication was compared with a hydrogel of the same drugs for rectal administration in 205 healthy children scheduled for minor ENT surgery. The intramuscular dose was 0.15±0.006 mg × kg^-1 compared to 0.25±0.015 mg×kg^-1 rectally. Reaction at administration and anaesthetic induction, incidence of intraoperative airway difficulties, Spo₂, ECG changes, postoperative pain and incidence of nausea were recorded. The administration for the rectal hycrogel group worked better and resulted in less postoperative nausea and slightly more postoperative pain. The children's behaviour at anaesthesia induction and the frequency of perioperative complications were similar in both groups. We conclude that for minor ENT surgery on children, premedication with rectal hydrogel of morphine-scopolamine is a good alternative to intramuscular morphine-scopolamine.     

Caudal neostigmine,bupivacaine, and their combination for postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery in children

In a randomized, double-blinded study, we examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 60 children. After the induction of general anesthesia, children were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 20) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg, with or without neostigmine 2 micro g/kg, or neostigmine 2 micro g/kg in normal saline 1 mL/kg. Intraoperatively, children receiving caudal bupivacaine or a bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture maintained hemodynamic stability, required less inhaled anesthetics, and had a shorter recovery time compared with the caudal neostigmine alone. Postoperatively, the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture resulted in superior analgesia compared with the other two groups. Recovery to first rescue analgesic times were (mean +/- SD) 22.8 +/- 2.9 h, 8.1 +/- 5.9 h, and 5.2 +/- 2.1 h in the bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, the bupivacaine and neostigmine groups received more doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine/neostigmine group to maintain adequate analgesia in the first 24 postoperative h. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 25%, 10%, and 30% in the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.01). We conclude that caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. Co-administration of the two drugs is associated with extended postoperative analgesia and reduced need for supplementary analgesics.     

Effect of dexmedetomidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine in a caudal block in pediatrics

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α₂‐adrenoceptor agonist that has been used increasingly in children. However, the effect of caudal DEX has not been evaluated before in children. This prospective randomized double‐blinded study was designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of caudal DEX with bupivacaine in providing pain relief over a 24‐h period. Methods: Sixty children (ASA status I) aged 1–6 years undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair/orchidopexy were allocated randomly to two groups (n=30 each). Group B received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml/kg; Group BD received the same dose of bupivacaine mixed with DEX 1 μg/kg during sevoflurane anesthesia. Processed electroencephalogram (bispectral index score), heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry and end‐tidal sevoflurane were recorded every 5 min. The characteristics of emergence, objective pain score, sedation score and quality of sleep were recorded post‐operatively. Duration of analgesia and requirement for additional analgesics were noted. Results: The end‐tidal sevoflurane concentration and the incidence of agitation were significantly lower in the BD group (P<0.05). The duration of analgesia was significantly longer (P<0.001) and the total consumption of rescue analgesic was significantly lower in Group BD compared with Group B (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in hemodynamics between both groups. However, group BD had better quality of sleep and a prolonged duration of sedation (P<0.05). Conclusion: Caudal DEX seems to be a promising adjunct to provide excellent analgesia without side effects over a 24‐h period. It has the advantage of keeping the patients calm for a prolonged time. Implications statement: Caudally administered DEX (1 μg/kg), combined with bupivacaine, was associated with an extended duration of post‐operative pain relief.     

Comparison of clonidine 1 microgram kg-1 with morphine 30 micrograms kg-1 for post-operative caudal analgesia in children

In a prospective randomized study in children, we compared caudal bupivacaine-clonidine with bupivacaine-morphine to evaluate whether clonidine can be used as an alternative to morphine in caudal anaesthesia. Caudal anaesthesia was administered in 36 children undergoing orchidopexy, hernia repair or circumcision, using 1.5 mL kg-1 bupivacaine 0.18% with either 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine (group 1) or 30 micrograms kg-1 morphine (group 2). Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, anaesthetic requirements, recovery time and pain score were monitored for 24 h. Eleven children in group 1 and nine children in group 2 did not need any supplementary systemic analgesics throughout the 24-h observation period. Mean (+/- SD) duration of analgesia in the remaining patients was 6.3 h (+/- 3.3 h) in group 1 and 7.1 h (+/- 3.4 h) in group 2 (P = 0.43). Recovery time after anaesthesia was significantly longer in group 1 (16.6 +/- 8.8 min) than in group 2 (11.5 +/- 4.7 min) (P < 0.05). We conclude that analgesia provided by 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine added to caudal bupivacaine is comparable with that provided by 30 micrograms kg-1 caudal morphine with bupivacaine. Clonidine at this low dose did not cause respiratory depression.     

Caudal morphine for postoperative analgesia in children: a comparison with caudal bupivacaine and intravenous morphine

We compared the efficacy, duration, and side effects of preservative-free morphine injected into the caudal space in children, with caudal bupivacaine and with intravenous morphine administration for relief of postoperative pain. Forty-six children, ages 1-16 yr, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous morphine (control group), caudal bupivacaine (0.25%, 1 ml/kg), or caudal morphine (0.5 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/kg). In half the patients given caudal morphine, the morphine was mixed with a dose of lidocaine adequate to produce sacral analgesia, to confirm correct caudal injection of the morphine. Caudal injections were performed at the end of surgery. Time until the first required postoperative intravenous morphine dose was recorded for each patient. The duration of analgesia was significantly greater with caudal morphine (median 12 hr, P less than 0.02) than with caudal bupivacaine (median 5 hr), and both were greater than with intravenous morphine in control patients (median 45 min). Urinary retention, pruritis, and nausea appeared with slightly greater frequency in the caudal morphine group, but no delayed respiratory depression occurred. Caudal morphine (0.5 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/kg) provided 8-24 hr of analgesia in children without a significantly greater incidence of side effects than caudal bupivacaine or intravenous morphine.     

Preoperative infiltration of the surgical area enhances postoperative analgesia of a combined low–dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery

In a randomized, blinded trial we assessed the value of adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine to a low dose epidural regimen for postoperative pain treatment. Forty–nine patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery during combined thoracic epidural (bupivacaine + morphine) and general anaesthesia were studied. Postoperative analgesia was epidural bupivacaine 10 mg hr^-1 + morphine 0.2 mg hr^-1 for 72 h. The patients randomly received preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine 0.25%, 40 ml (group I); or no infiltration (group II). Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough and during mobilization six and eight h after start of surgery, and at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the following days until 72 h after start of surgery. The sensory level of analgesia was evaluated by pin prick. We found no difference between the two groups during rest and cough. However, during mobilization group I had lower pain scores compared to group II ( P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the need for supplemental intramuscular morphine in the treatment group compared to the control group ( P <0.05). Thus an enhanced analgesic effect was demonstrated by adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with local anaesthetic to a low dose epidural bupivacaine/morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery.     

Pre-operative analgesia with rectal diclofenac and/or paracetamol in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Both rectal diclofenac and paracetamol are commonly used to treat acute postoperative pain in children but combining them to improve the quality of analgesia is controversial. This study aimed to detect whether the pre-operative combined administration of rectal diclofenac and paracetamol is superior to either drug alone. One hundred and eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either rectal diclofenac 1 mg.kg⁻¹ or paracetamol 40 mg.kg⁻¹ or their combination 1 h prior to surgery. In the first 24 h postoperatively, pain was assessed using the Wong and Baker Pain Scale. If the patients experienced a pain score of 2 or more, morphine was given. The total dose of morphine and number of doses required were recorded. Children who received the rectal diclofenac-paracetamol combination experienced a lower pain scale and a decreased need for morphine compared with children receiving each drug alone.     

Does tramadol wound infiltration offer an advantage over bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children following herniotomy?

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that tramadol is an effective analgesic. We aimed to compare postoperative analgesic effects of wound infiltration with tramadol (T) or bupivacaine (B) and intramuscular tramadol (I) after herniotomy in children. METHODS: In this study, 75 children were randomly assigned to group T, group B and group I. Wound infiltration was performed to the patients in group T (2 mg.kg-1 tramadol in 0.2 ml.kg-1 saline) and group B (0.2 ml.kg-1 0.25% bupivacaine) into the surgical incision. Twenty minutes before the end of the surgery 2 mg.kg-1 tramadol was injected i.m. in group I. Faces pain scale was used for assessing pain severity. Patients with pain score>2 were treated with paracetamol. The frequency of side effects and analgesic use were recorded. Patients were discharged on the next day. RESULTS: No side effects were recorded in any group. The pain scores of the patients at the first, fourth and eighth hours were significantly higher in group B and group I than group T (P<0.05). The pain scores of the patients at the first hour were significantly higher in group I compared with group B (P<0.05). Average time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group T (6.72+/-4.09 h after herniotomy than both group I (4.49+/-3.9 h) and group B (6.04+/-3.7 h) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Wound infiltration with tramadol may be a good choice for postoperative analgesia in children having inguinal herniotomy.     

Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine

In a randomized, double-blind study we have examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal administration of midazolam, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 45 children, undergoing inguinal herniotomy. They were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 15 in each) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml · kg^?1 with or without midazolam 50 μg · kg^?1 or midazolam 50 μg · kg^?1 with normal saline 1 ml · kg^?1. There were no differences in quality of pain relief, postoperative behaviour or analgesic requirements between the midazolam group and the other two groups. Times to first analgesic administration (paracetamol suppositories) were longer (P < 0.001) in the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other two groups. Further, the bupivacaine-midazolam group received fewer (P < 0.05) doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine group. Side effects such as motor weakness, respiratory depression or prolonged sedation were not observed in patients who received caudal epidural midazolam only. We conclude that caudal midazolam in a dose of 50 μg · kg^?1 provides equivalent analgesia to bupivacaine 0.25%, when administered postoperatively in a volume of 1 ml · kg^?1 for children following unilateral inguinal hemiotomy.

     

Peritonsillar infiltration with bupivacaine and pethidine for relief of post-tonsillectomy pain: a randomised double-blind study

Previous studies of infiltration of local anaesthetics in children undergoing tonsillectomy resulted in conflicting results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the peritonsillar injection of bupivacaine and pethidine on postoperative pain in children undergoing snare-dissection tonsillectomy. In a double-blind study, 80 children (aged 7–15 years) were randomly divided into two groups receiving peritonsillar injection of either bupivacaine (1 mg.kg⁻¹) and pethidine (1 mg.kg⁻¹) in adrenaline 1 : 200 000 (treatment group) or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo group) pre-operatively. The time needed for first demand of analgesia and analgesic consumption to reduce the visual analogue scale (VAS) for resting throat pain to≤30, the VAS for pain on swallowing, drinking liquid and eating a soft diet, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and the need for rescue anti-emetics in the first 24 h after operation were compared in both groups. The combination of bupivacaine and pethidine could significantly decrease the consumption of analgesics for resting pain at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after operation but did not reduce pain on swallowing, drinking liquid and eating a soft diet. The times to demand of first dose of analgesic and to first oral intake were not significantly different. The overall satisfaction of patients in relation to relief of postoperative pain was not significantly different between the two groups. Although peritonsillar injection of pethidine and bupivacaine in children reduces the analgesic consumption, it does not affect the dynamic pain state in the first 24 h after snare-dissection tonsillectomy.