Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of sonographically guided core biopsies performed with the 14-gauge automated gun with the outcome of those performed with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Outcome was defined in terms of missed tumors, the need (both immediate and delayed) for a second biopsy, histologic underestimation, and complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all sonographically guided core biopsies performed between January 1997 and August 2001. Before February 2000, biopsies were performed using the 14-gauge automated gun and after that time, with either the 14-gauge automated gun or the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. During the study period, 181 biopsies were performed with the 14-gauge automated gun and 100 with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. RESULTS: The histologic results of the core biopsies were similar for the group who underwent biopsy with the 14-gauge automated gun and the group who underwent biopsy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: malignant, 19% versus 19%; benign, 78% versus 79%; and high-risk lesion or other, 3% versus 2%, respectively (p > 0.7). Complications were rare and similar for both methods: 2% for the 14-gauge automated gun and 3% for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.46). A second biopsy was recommended immediately after the first in 14% of the patients who underwent biopsy with the 14-gauge automated gun versus 17% of those who underwent biopsy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.47). Recommendation for delayed rebiopsy due to interval change occurred in 2.5% of the patients who underwent biopsy with the 14-gauge automated gun method and 3% of those who underwent biopsy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.94). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the outcomes of sonographically guided core biopsies performed with the automated gun compared with those performed with the vacuum-assisted device in terms of missed cancers, underestimation, complications, or the need (immediate or delayed) for a second biopsy.     

Sonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast

Objective

We wanted to assess the need for surgical excising papillary lesions of the breast that were diagnosed upon sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-nine women (age range: 25-74 years, mean age: 51.7 years) with 69 papillary lesions (4.9%) were diagnosed and followed after performing sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsies. Surgical excision was performed for 44 (64%) of 69 papillary lesions, and 25 lesions were followed with imaging studies (range: 6-46 months, mean: 17.9 months). The histologic findings upon core biopsy were compared with the surgical, imaging and follow-up findings.

Results

Core needle biopsies of 69 lesions yielded tissue that was classified as benign for 43 lesions, atypical for 18 lesions and malignant for eight lesions. Of the 43 lesions that yielded benign papilloma upon core needle biopsy, one had intraductal papillary carcinoma found upon surgery. An immediate surgical biopsy was recommended for this lesion because of the imaging-histologic discordance. No additional carcinoma was found during the imaging follow-up. Surgical excision was performed for 17 atypical papillary lesions, and this revealed intraductal (n = 6) or invasive (n = 2) papillary carcinoma in 8 (47%) lesions. Of the seven intraductal papillary carcinomas, surgery revealed invasive papillary carcinoma in one (14%).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that papillary lesions of the breast that are diagnosed as benign upon sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy can be followed when the results are concordant with the imaging findings.     

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision

OBJECTIVE: This investigation compares the frequency of histologic underestimation of breast carcinoma that occurs when a large-core needle biopsy reveals atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ with the automated 14-gauge needle, the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, and the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Evaluation of 428 large-core needle biopsies yielding atypical ductal hyperplasia (139 lesions) or ductal carcinoma in situ (289 lesions) was performed. The results of subsequent surgical excision were retrospectively compared with the needle biopsy results. RESULTS: For lesions initially diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ, underestimation of invasive ductal carcinoma was significantly less frequent using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device when compared with the automated 14-gauge needle (10% versus 21%, p < 0.05) but was not significantly less frequent when compared with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device (10% versus 17%, p > 0.1). For lesions diagnosed initially as atypical ductal hyperplasia, underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma was significantly less frequent using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device compared with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device (19% versus 39%, p = 0. 025) and with the automated 14-gauge needle (19% versus 44%, p = 0. 01). CONCLUSION: The frequency of histologic underestimation of breast carcinoma in lesions initially diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ using large-core needle biopsy is substantially lower with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device than with the automated 14-gauge needle and with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device.     

Core needle breast biopsy in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: We compared complication rates of core needle breast biopsy in patients with and without concurrent anticoagulation therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Experience with 501 14-gauge and 179 11-gauge core needle breast biopsies was recorded prospectively. We performed 18 (3%) of 680 procedures on patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy. Eleven biopsies were performed in eight women treated with warfarin, one in a patient treated with heparin, and six in six women treated with aspirin. Ten biopsies were performed with sonographic guidance and a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun. Eight biopsies were performed with an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted probe and stereotactic guidance. RESULTS: Hematomas occurred in three (38%) of eight anticoagulated patients undergoing 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy, measuring 13 mm, 17 mm, and 40 mm. In patients not known to be anticoagulated, small hematomas were mammographically evident in 77 (45%) of 171 biopsies performed with an 11-gauge probe, averaging 8 mm (range, 2-17 mm); only 13 (8%) of 171 had hematomas larger than 10 mm. Small hematomas, averaging 6 mm (range, 2-12 mm) were evident mammographically in 45 (45%) of 100 stereotactic biopsies using a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun; three (3%) experienced hematomas larger than 10 mm. A 10-mm hematoma was evident during one (10%) of the 10 biopsies performed in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy under sonographic guidance using a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun; small hematomas (mean, 10 mm) were noted during seven (2%) of 391 corresponding sonographically guided biopsies in patients not undergoing anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSION: No patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy experienced clinically important complications; preliminary results suggest rates of hematoma formation similar to those in the control group. As such, discontinuing anticoagulation medication before core needle breast biopsy may be unnecessary when the need for biopsy is urgent.     

Stereotactic biopsy of noncalcified breast lesions: utility of vacuum-assisted technique compared to multipass automated gun technique

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stereotactic 14-gauge, vacuum-assisted biopsy technique in diagnosing noncalcified breast lesions. Stereotactic biopsy of 116 noncalcified breast lesions was performed with either 14-gauge, vacuum-assisted technique or multipass, automated large-core technique. The number of core samples and time required for each biopsy were compared. Outcome for each technique was compared based on recommendations after the mammographic-histologic review process. Results from surgical excision and mammographic follow-up were reviewed. The vacuum-assisted technique obtained more tissue cores per lesion than the automated gun technique, showed marginal decrease in number of repeat biopsies for discordant results, and required fewer short-term follow-up mammograms, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The vacuum-assisted technique can be used successfully to sample noncalcified breast masses, with marginal improvement over the automated gun technique.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy of noncalcified lesions: a cost-minimization analysis comparing 14-gauge multipass automated core biopsy to 14- and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy

A decision model was used to compare the relative costs of the 14-gauge automated gun technique to the 14-gauge and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted techniques for stereotactic biopsy of noncalcified breast lesions. Probability and cost variables were estimated from clinical experience with 76 automated gun biopsies, seventy-eight 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies and thirty-nine 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies. The 14-gauge automated gun was the preferred strategy from a cost standpoint: the 14-gauge vacuum technique was 1.19 times more expensive, and the 11-gauge was 1.22 times more expensive.     

Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p = .13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION: The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.     

Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the underestimation rate of invasive carcinoma in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at percutaneous ultrasound-guided core biopsies of breast lesions between 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy (ACNB) and 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), and to determine the relationship between the lesion type (mass or microcalcification on radiological findings) and the DCIS underestimation rate.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed imaging-guided biopsies of breast lesions performed from February 2003 to August 2008. 194 lesions were diagnosed as DCIS at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 138 lesions in 132 patients by 14-gauge ACNB, and 56 lesions in 56 patients by 8- or 11-gauge VAB. The histological results of the core biopsy samples were correlated with surgical specimens. The clinical and radiological findings were also reviewed. The histological DCIS underestimation rates were compared between the two groups and were analysed for differences according to the clinical and radiological characteristics of the lesions.

Results

The DCIS underestimation rate was 47.8% (66/138) for 14-gauge ACNB and 16.1% (9/56) for VAB (p<0.001). According to the lesion type on sonography, DCIS underestimation was 43.4% (63/145) in masses (47.6% using ACNB and 15.8% using VAB; p=0.012) and 24.5% (12/49) in microcalcifications (50.0% using ACNB and 16.2% using VAB; p=0.047).

Conclusion

The underestimation rate of invasive carcinoma in cases with DCIS at ultrasound-guided core biopsies was significantly higher for ACNB than for VAB. Furthermore, this difference does not change according to the lesion type on ultrasound. Therefore, ultrasound-guided VAB can be a useful method for the diagnosis of DCIS lesions presented as either mass or microcalcification.Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is mostly presented as microcalcification on radiography. Therefore, previous reports regarding the accuracy of core biopsy in DCIS have mainly focused on stereotactic (ST) guidance [1-4]. With the development and introduction of high-resolution ultrasound, several reports have studied various applications of ultrasound on the core biopsy for breast lesions, including ultrasound-guided core biopsy for microcalcification [5-9] and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted removal [10]. Ultrasound guidance has several advantages over ST guidance: a lack of ionising radiation, use of non-dedicated equipment, real-time needle visualisation, multidirectional sampling, lower cost [8,11] and less patient discomfort [8,11-13]. For these reasons, ultrasound-guided core biopsy may be preferable in lesions that are amenable to core biopsy with both ST and ultrasound guidance.One critical issue in percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis of DCIS may be DCIS underestimation, which means the underestimation of invasive cancer in cases where the core biopsy shows DCIS [1]. As underestimated DCIS at the core biopsy is upgraded to invasive carcinoma at surgery, axillary node dissection at a later date and thus a two-stage therapeutic surgical procedure can be resulted in [1]. The DCIS underestimation rate in ST-guided core biopsy is generally 10–36% with a large number of cases. Among them, 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is well known to show a significantly lower DCIS underestimation rate than 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy (ACNB) under ST-guidance [1,14-16]. However, studies with ultrasound-guided core biopsy have not found significant differences in DCIS underestimation between ACNB and VAB [17-18]. Moreover, previous studies using ultrasound guidance included only a small number of cases, and it is not well established whether the biopsy device (ACNB or VAB) and lesion type (microcalcification or mass) would affect the underestimation rate under ultrasound guidance.The purpose of this study was to compare the underestimation rate of invasive carcinoma in cases with DCIS at ultrasound-guided core biopsies between 14-gauge ACNB and VAB, and to determine the relationship between lesion types (mass or microcalcification on radiological findings) and the DCIS underestimation rate.     

US-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Microcalcifications in Breast Lesions and Long-Term Follow-Up Results

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the use of an ultrasonography (US)-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for microcalcifications of breast lesions and to evaluate the efficacy of the use of US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy with long-term follow-up results.

Materials and Methods

US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy cases of breast lesions that were performed between 2002 and 2006 for microcalcifications were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 62 breast lesions were identified where further pathological confirmation was obtained or where at least two years of mammography follow-up was obtained. These lesions were divided into the benign and malignant lesions (benign and malignant group) and were divided into underestimated group and not-underestimated lesions (underestimated and not-underestimated group) according to the diagnosis after a vacuum-assisted biopsy. The total number of specimens that contained microcalcifications was analyzed and the total number of microcalcification flecks as depicted on specimen mammography was analyzed to determine if there was any statistical difference between the groups.

Results

There were no false negative cases after more than two years of follow-up. Twenty-nine lesions were diagnosed as malignant (two invasive carcinomas and 27 carcinoma in situ lesions). Two of the 27 carcinoma in situ lesions were upgraded to invasive cancers after surgery. Among three patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia, the diagnosis was upgraded to a ductal carcinoma in situ after surgery in one patient. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of specimens with microcalcifications and the total number of microcalcification flecks between the benign group and malignant group of patients and between the underestimated group and not-underestimated group of patients.

Conclusion

US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy can be an effective alternative to stereotactic-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in cases where microcalcifications are visible with the use of high-resolution US.     

Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of carcinoma at percutaneous directional vacuum-assisted removal (DVAR) in women with imaging-histologic discordance during ultrasound (US)-guided automated core needle biopsy, and to determine the role of DVAR in breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance. A US-guided 14-gauge automated core needle biopsy was performed on 837 consecutive lesions. Imaging-histologic discordance was prospectively considered in 33 of 634 benign biopsies. DVAR was recommended in those lesions. Among the 33 lesions, 26 lesions that underwent subsequent DVAR or surgical excision made up our study population. Medical records, imaging studies, and histologic findings were reviewed. Among the 26 lesions, 18 lesions underwent subsequent US–guided DVAR, with 8-gauge probes for 15 of the lesions, and 11-gauge for three of the lesions. Two lesions were diagnosed as having carcinoma (2/18, 11.1% of upgrade rate; 3.1–32.8% CI). The remaining eight lesions underwent subsequent surgical excision, and carcinoma was diagnosed in one case (12.5% of upgrade rate; 2.2–47.1% CI). A US-guided DVAR of the breast mass with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14-gauge automated core needle biopsy is a valuable alternative to surgery as a means of obtaining a definitive histological diagnosis. An erratum to this article can be found at     

Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to show that one can safely remove all sonographic evidence of masses in the breast less than or equal to 1.5 cm in greatest dimension using the 11-gauge handheld Mammotome, thereby reducing the possibility of a false-negative diagnosis and other shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over a 12-week period (May 3--July 31, 2000), 124 sonographically guided breast biopsies were performed in 113 patients, using a new handheld directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. All lesions that were less than or equal to 1.5 cm were biopsied using a handheld Mammotome; an attempt was made to continue the biopsy until no sonographic evidence of the lesion remained. RESULTS: Of these 124 lesions, 14 had infiltrating ductal carcinomas, four had infiltrating ductal carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ, one had infiltrating lobular carcinoma, one had ductal carcinoma in situ, three had atypical ductal hyperplasias, one had atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one had phyllodes tumor. Only one infiltrating ductal carcinoma was entirely removed histologically at Mammotome biopsy. There were no underestimates of disease. No cases of epithelial displacement were observed in any of the surgical excisions of malignancies. The remaining 99 lesions were benign. CONCLUSION: The handheld Mammotome diminishes the shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. It reduces the possibility of false-negatives and underestimation of disease. It eliminates the need for multiple insertions and reduces the likelihood of epithelial displacement. As a result, we now use this device for all sonographically guided biopsies of breast masses smaller than 1.5 cm and recommend that others consider it for such use.     

Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB), US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (US-VAB), and stereotactic-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (S-VAB) for diagnosing suspicious breast microcalcification.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 336 cases of suspicious breast microcalcification in patients who subsequently underwent image-guided biopsy. US-CNB was performed for US-visible microcalcifications associated with a mass (n = 28), US-VAB for US-visible microcalcifications without an associated mass (n = 59), and S-VAB for mammogram-only visible lesions (n = 249). Mammographic findings, biopsy failure rate, false-negative rate, and underestimation rate were analyzed. Histological diagnoses and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories were reported.

Results

Biopsy failure rates for US-CNB, US-VAB, and S-VAB were 7.1% (2/28), 0% (0/59), and 2.8% (7/249), respectively. Three false-negative cases were detected for US-CNB and two for S-VAB. The rates of biopsy-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ that were upgraded to invasive cancer at surgery were 41.7% (5/12), 12.9% (4/31), and 8.6% (3/35) for US-CNB, US-VAB, and S-VAB, respectively. Sonographically visible lesions were more likely to be malignant (66.2% [51/77] vs. 23.2% [46/198]; p < 0.001) or of higher BI-RADS category (61.0% [47/77] vs. 22.2% [44/198]; p < 0.001) than sonographically invisible lesions.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is more accurate than US-CNB when suspicious microcalcifications are detected on US. Calcifications with malignant pathology are significantly more visible on US than benign lesions.     

Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy

OBJECTIVE: This review was undertaken to determine the reliability of the histologic diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) made from tissue obtained by 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of impalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-two 11-gauge stereotactically guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies were performed at our institution between November 5, 1996, and June 30, 1998. Biopsies were performed with the patient prone on a dedicated stereotactic biopsy table. A directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device was used. Eight to 24 cores (mean, 13.4) were harvested from each lesion. Radiography of core specimens was performed in cases in which the target lesion contained microcalcifications. Twenty (4.7%) of the 422 biopsies yielded a histopathologic diagnosis of ADH. Surgical excision of 16 of the 20 lesions was subsequently performed. We compared the histopathologic results of the core extracted and the corresponding surgically excised tissue. RESULTS: Of the 16 surgically excised lesions, four (25.0%) retained the diagnosis of ADH. Four (25%) were upgraded to carcinoma: Two (12.5%) were ductal carcinoma in situ without comedonecrosis, one (6.3%) was invasive carcinoma, and one (6.3%) was tubular carcinoma. Of the remaining eight surgically excised lesions, six (37.5%) were interpreted as benign fibrocystic changes with ductal hyperplasia without atypia, and two (12.5%) were interpreted as lobular carcinoma in situ. CONCLUSION: Because ADH was underdiagnosed in 25% of the lesions, we recommend that surgical excision be performed whenever ADH is found in tissue obtained from 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.     

Ultraschallgezielte Stanzbiopsie der Mamma: Technik,Ergebnisse, Indikationen

Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of sonographically guided core needle biopsy in palpable breast masses, mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions, and sonographically detected clinically and mammographically occult lesions. Patients and methods. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy was performed in 590 lesions in 572 patients, by using an automated biopsy gun with a 14-gauge large core needle and a coaxial system. Core needle biopsy results were compared with surgical biopsy in 265 cases. 325 lesions with benign histologic diagnoses were followed up for at least 18 months. Results. 234 carcinomas and 356 benign abnormalities were found in the 572 patients. Core needle biopsy reached a sensitivity of 98.7% at a specificity of 99.7%. Understimation rates for lesions initially diagnosed as DCIS and for lesions initially diagnosed as ADH were 3/10 and 6/14, respectively. Of three false-negative results, two were immediately recognized, and one was identfied at follow-up. Serious bleeding occured in one patient (0.2% complication rate). Conclusions. This report confirms that sonographically guided large core needle biopsy is a safe, reliable and cost-effective method for the assessment of both palpable and nonpalpable, mammographically and sonographically detected breast abnormalities.     

Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions

Across several series, the sensitivity of sonographically guided 14-gauge core biopsy is 95%, and the repeat biopsy rate averages 11%. Success of stereotactic biopsy requires obtaining larger volumes of tissue when sampling calcifications; use of vacuum-assisted devices results in comparable sensitivities. For MR imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy,success rates of 95% to 99% have been achieved. Independent of guidance method or the amounts of tissue acquired, the following diagnoses on percutaneous biopsy should generally prompt excision: atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, radial sclerosing lesions, benign and atypical papillary lesions, and possible phyllodes tumor. Mucocele-like lesions may merit excision. Columnar alteration without atypia probably does not require excision, although further study is needed.     

Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: how many cases are enough?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 923 consecutive lesions that underwent stereotactic breast biopsy performed by one of six radiologists. Four hundred fourteen lesions had 14-gauge automated core biopsy, and 509 subsequent lesions had vacuum-assisted biopsy (14-gauge in 163 and 11-gauge in 346). Medical records were reviewed to determine the technical success rate and false-negative rate as a function of operator experience. RESULTS: For 14-gauge automated core biopsy, a significantly lower technical success rate was seen for the first five cases of each radiologist than for subsequent cases (25/30 = 83.3% versus 366/384 = 95.3%, p < 0.02) and for the first 20 cases than for subsequent cases (90/100 = 90% versus 284/296 = 95.9%, p < 0.05). For 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, a significantly lower technical success rate was seen for the first five cases than for subsequent cases (17/20 = 85.0% versus 310/322 = 96.3%, p < 0.05) and for the first 15 cases than for subsequent cases (54/60 = 90.0% versus 273/283 = 96.5%, p = 0.03). The false-negative rate was higher for the first 15 cases compared with subsequent cases both for stereotactic 14-gauge automated core biopsy (4/31 = 12.9% versus 3/115 = 2.6%, p < 0.04) and for stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy (2/27 = 7.4% versus 0/85 = 0%, p < 0.06). CONCLUSION: A learning curve exists for stereotactic breast biopsy. Significantly higher technical success rates and lower false-negative rates were observed after the first five to 20 cases for 14-gauge automated core biopsy and after the first five to 15 cases for 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Even after a radiologist has experience with stereotactic biopsy, changes in equipment may result in a new learning curve.     

Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency with which stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy obviated a surgical procedure and to calculate cost savings attributable to that biopsy method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 200 consecutive solitary nonpalpable lesions on which stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was performed. Cost savings were calculated using Medicare reimbursements. Mammograms, histologic findings, and medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy obviated a surgical procedure in 151 (76%) of 200 lesions, including 112 (73%) of 154 calcific lesions and 39 (85%) of 46 masses. Reasons for not obviating a surgical procedure in 49 lesions (25%) included recommendation for surgical biopsy in 35 lesions (18%), small carcinomas treated by excision in 10 lesions (5%), and histologic underestimation in four lesions (2%). Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy decreased the cost of diagnosis by S264 per case, a 20% ($264/$1289) decrease in the cost of diagnosis compared with surgical biopsy. Of 200 lesions that had stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy, 106 (53%) would not have been amenable to 14-gauge automated core biopsy because of their small size, their superficial location, or inadequate breast thickness. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy obviated a surgical procedure in 76% of lesions, yielding a 20% decrease in cost of diagnosis compared with surgical biopsy. Although savings per case are modest, 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy expands the spectrum of lesions amenable to stereotactic biopsy, increasing cost savings in the population.     

Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of, and cost of diagnosing with, different breast biopsy methods for women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy underwent diagnostic biopsy. Of these, 89 women had stereotactic biopsy with a 14-gauge automated needle (n = 25), 14-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 17), or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 47); and 50 women had diagnostic surgical biopsy. Medical records were reviewed. Cost savings for stereotactic biopsy were calculated using Medicare data. RESULTS: The median number of operations was one for women who had stereotactic biopsy versus two for women who had diagnostic surgical biopsy. The likelihood of undergoing a single operation was significantly greater for women who had stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy, among all women (61/89 [68.5%] vs. 19/50 [38.0%], p < 0.001) and among women treated for breast cancer (55/77 [71.4%] vs. 6/37 [16.2%], p = 0.0000001). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, was significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure (36/47 [76.6%] vs. 16/42 [38.1%], p = 0.0005). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy resulted in the greatest cost reduction, yielding savings of $315 per case compared with diagnostic surgical biopsy; for women with solitary lesions, stereotactic 11-gauge biopsy decreased the cost of diagnosis by 22.2% ($334/$1502). CONCLUSION: For women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy, the use of stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy decreases the number of operations. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, is significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure and has the highest cost savings.     

Management of non malignant papillary lesions diagnosed on percutaneous biopsy

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of percutaneous breast biopsies in diagnosing and managing non malignant papillary lesions and determine if subsequent excision must be systematic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review of 2233 breast biopsies over a 43 months period (September 2001 to March 2005): sonographically guided core biopsies (n = 836), ultrasound (n = 346) or stereotactic (n:1051) guided vacuum biopsies. 86 non malignant papillary tumors were diagnosed (core biopsy:28, US:38 and stereotactic guided vacuum biopsy:20). A larger sample was systematic after core biopsy: lumpectomy (n = 19) or vacuum biopsy (n = 9). Surgical excision followed vacuum biopsy (n = 18) in case of atypia or sampling excision. Alternatively, yearly follow-up was advised (n = 40). Correlation with surgical findings (n = 37) or mammographic follow-up (n = 49) is presented. The influence of various factors on the risk of underestimation was analysed. RESULTS: Surgical resection revealed an underestimation of 5/37 (13.5%): 4/19 with core- and 1/18 with vacuum-assisted biopsy corresponding to 4 low grade ductal carcinoma in situ and a microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ. It was higher for core biopsies and related to age and size: higher when women<50 years and when radiological image>1 cm. The influence of the other factors was not significant. Of the 9 non operated papillomas after core biopsy, vacuum biopsy revealed an additional underestimation (low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 49 papillary lesions that were not surgically biopsied, 40 were monitored at 2-42 months (average: 19 months). No carcinoma was detected during this follow-up. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous biopsy is an accurate technique in managing papillary tumors. A larger histologic specimen is necessary after core biopsy. Vacuum biopsy is an attractive alternative to surgery for smaller papillomas (<1 cm), but in spite of nonsignificant results we advise subsequent excision in case of multiple papillomas, atypia or residual tumor.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates

PURPOSE: To measure the effect of biopsy device, probe size, mammographic lesion type, lesion size, and number of samples obtained per lesion on the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonpalpable breast lesions at 16 institutions received a histologic diagnosis of DCIS after 14-gauge automated large-core biopsy in 373 lesions and after 14- or 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy in 953 lesions. The presence of histopathologic invasive carcinoma was noted at subsequent surgical biopsy. RESULTS: By performing the chi(2) test, independent significant DCIS underestimation rates by biopsy device were 20.4% (76 of 373) of lesions diagnosed at large-core biopsy and 11.2% (107 of 953) of lesions diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy (P <.001); by lesion type, 24.3% (35 of 144) of masses and 12.5% (148 of 1,182) of microcalcifications (P <.001); and by number of specimens per lesion, 17.5% (88 of 502) with 10 or fewer specimens and 11.5% (92 of 799) with greater than 10 (P <.02). DCIS underestimations increased with lesion size. CONCLUSION: DCIS underestimations were 1.9 times more frequent with masses than with calcifications, 1.8 times more frequent with large-core biopsy than with vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 1.5 times more frequent with 10 or fewer specimens per lesion than with more than 10 specimens per lesion.